Articles | Volume 15, issue 12
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 4689–4708, 2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4689-2022

Special issue: The Loop 3D stochastic geological modelling platform – development...

Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 4689–4708, 2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4689-2022
Methods for assessment of models
20 Jun 2022
Methods for assessment of models | 20 Jun 2022

loopUI-0.1: indicators to support needs and practices in 3D geological modelling uncertainty quantification

Guillaume Pirot et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 1,928 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,550 345 33 1,928 16 11
  • HTML: 1,550
  • PDF: 345
  • XML: 33
  • Total: 1,928
  • BibTeX: 16
  • EndNote: 11
Views and downloads (calculated since 07 Jan 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 07 Jan 2022)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,928 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,763 with geography defined and 165 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 29 Jan 2023
Download
Short summary
Results of a survey launched among practitioners in the mineral industry show that despite recognising the importance of uncertainty quantification it is not very well performed due to lack of data, time requirements, poor tracking of interpretations and relative complexity of uncertainty quantification. To alleviate the latter, we provide an open-source set of local and global indicators to measure geological uncertainty among an ensemble of geological models.