Articles | Volume 15, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2345-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2345-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Model evaluation paper
| 
18 Mar 2022
Model evaluation paper |
| 18 Mar 2022
| 18 Mar 2022
The effects of ocean surface waves on global intraseasonal prediction: case studies with a coupled CFSv2.0–WW3 system
Ruizi Shi
Department of Earth System Science, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Earth System Modeling, Institute for Global Change Studies, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China
Fanghua Xu
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Department of Earth System Science, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Earth System Modeling, Institute for Global Change Studies, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China
Li Liu
Department of Earth System Science, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Earth System Modeling, Institute for Global Change Studies, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China
Zheng Fan
Department of Earth System Science, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Earth System Modeling, Institute for Global Change Studies, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China
Department of Earth System Science, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Earth System Modeling, Institute for Global Change Studies, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China
Hong Li
Department of Earth System Science, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Earth System Modeling, Institute for Global Change Studies, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China
Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, Institute of
Atmospheric Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200433, China
Xiang Li
Key Laboratory of Marine Hazards Forecasting, National Marine
Environmental Forecasting Center, Ministry of Natural Resources, Beijing,
100081, China
Yunfei Zhang
Key Laboratory of Marine Hazards Forecasting, National Marine
Environmental Forecasting Center, Ministry of Natural Resources, Beijing,
100081, China
Related authors
Ruizi Shi and Fanghua Xu
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1839–1856, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1839-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1839-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Based on the Gaussian quadrature method, a fast algorithm of sea-spray-mediated heat flux is developed. Compared with the widely used single-radius algorithm, the new fast algorithm shows a better agreement with the full spectrum integral of spray flux. The new fast algorithm is evaluated in a coupled modeling system, and the simulations of sea surface temperature, wind speed and wave height are improved. Thereby, the new fast algorithm has great potential to be used in coupled modeling systems.
Xinzhu Yu, Li Liu, Chao Sun, Qingu Jiang, Biao Zhao, Zhiyuan Zhang, Hao Yu, and Bin Wang
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 6285–6308, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6285-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6285-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In this paper we propose a new common, flexible, and efficient parallel I/O framework for earth system modeling based on C-Coupler2.0. CIOFC1.0 can handle data I/O in parallel and provides a configuration file format that enables users to conveniently change the I/O configurations. It can automatically make grid and time interpolation, output data with an aperiodic time series, and accelerate data I/O when the field size is large.
Li Liu, Chao Sun, Xinzhu Yu, Hao Yu, Qingu Jiang, Xingliang Li, Ruizhe Li, Bin Wang, Xueshun Shen, and Guangwen Yang
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 2833–2850, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2833-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2833-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
C-Coupler3.0 is an integrated coupler infrastructure with new features, i.e. a series of parallel-optimization technologies, a common halo-exchange library, a common module-integration framework, a common framework for conveniently developing a weakly coupled ensemble data assimilation system, and a common framework for flexibly inputting and outputting fields in parallel. It is able to handle coupling under much finer resolutions (e.g. more than 100 million horizontal grid cells).
Ruizi Shi and Fanghua Xu
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1839–1856, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1839-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1839-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Based on the Gaussian quadrature method, a fast algorithm of sea-spray-mediated heat flux is developed. Compared with the widely used single-radius algorithm, the new fast algorithm shows a better agreement with the full spectrum integral of spray flux. The new fast algorithm is evaluated in a coupled modeling system, and the simulations of sea surface temperature, wind speed and wave height are improved. Thereby, the new fast algorithm has great potential to be used in coupled modeling systems.
Xueming Zhu, Ziqing Zu, Shihe Ren, Miaoyin Zhang, Yunfei Zhang, Hui Wang, and Ang Li
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 995–1015, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-995-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-995-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
SCSOFS has provided daily updated marine forecasting in the South China Sea for the next 5 d since 2013. Comprehensive updates have been conducted to the configurations of SCSOFS's physical model and data assimilation scheme in order to improve its forecasting skill. The three most sensitive updates are highlighted. Scientific comparison and accuracy assessment results indicate that remarkable improvements have been achieved in SCSOFSv2 with respect to the original version SCSOFSv1.
Cited articles
Andreas, E. L., Persson, P. O. G., and Hare, J. E.: A bulk turbulent air-sea
flux algorithm for high-wind, spray conditions, J. Phys.
Oceanogr., 38, 1581–1596, 2008.
Andreas, E. L., Mahrt, L., and Vickers, D.: An improved bulk air-sea surface
flux algorithm, including spray-mediated transfer, Q. J.
Roy. Meteor. Soc., 141, 642–654, 2015.
Ardhuin, F., Rogers, E., Babanin, A. V., Filipot, J., Magne, R., Roland, A.,
Der Westhuysen, A. V., Queffeulou, P., Lefevre, J. M., and Aouf, L.:
Semiempirical Dissipation Source Functions for Ocean Waves. Part I:
Definition, Calibration, and Validation, J. Phys. Oceanogr.,
40, 1917–1941, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JPO4324.1, 2010.
Atlas, R., Hoffman, R. N., Ardizzone, J., Leidner, S. M., Jusem, J. C.,
Smith, D. K., and Gombos, D.: A Cross-calibrated, Multiplatform Ocean
Surface Wind Velocity Product for Meteorological and Oceanographic
Applications, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 92, 157–174,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2010BAMS2946.1, 2011.
Bao, Y., Song, Z., and Qiao, F.: FIO-ESM version 2.0: Model description and
evaluation, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 125, e2019JC016036,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JC016036, 2019.
Belcher, S. E., Grant, A. L. M., Hanley, K., Foxkemper, B., Van Roekel, L.,
Sullivan, P. P., Large, W. G., Brown, A. R., Hines, A., and Calvert, D.: A
global perspective on Langmuir turbulence in the ocean surface boundary
layer, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L18605,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL052932, 2012.
Beljaars, A. C. M.: The parametrization of surface fluxes in large-scale
models under free convection. Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 121,
255–270, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712152203, 1994.
Belmonte Rivas, M. and Stoffelen, A.: Characterizing ERA-Interim and ERA5 surface wind biases using ASCAT, Ocean Sci., 15, 831–852, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-15-831-2019, 2019.
Bidlot, J.-R.: Present status of wave forecasting at ECMWF, Workshop on ocean waves, online, 25–27 June 2012, 14784, https://www.ecmwf.int/sites/default/files/elibrary/2012/8234-present-status-wave-forecasting-ecmwf.pdf (last access: 20 January 2022), 2012.
Bidlot, J.-R.: Model upgrade improves ocean wave forecasts, ECMWF newsletter, online, April 2019, 159, 10, https://www.ecmwf.int/en/newsletter/159/news/modelupgrade-improves-ocean-wave-forecasts (last access: 20 January 2022), 2019.
Bidlot, J.-R., Prates, F., Ribas, R., Mueller-Quintino, A., Crepulja, M., and Vitart, F.: Enhancing tropical cyclone wind forecasts, ECMWF newsletter, online, July 2020, 164, 33–37, https://www.ecmwf.int/en/newsletter/164/meteorology/enhancing-tropical-cyclone-wind-forecasts (last access: 20 January 2022), 2020.
Breivik, Ø., Janssen, P. A., and Bidlot, J.-R.: Approximate Stokes drift
profiles in deep water, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 44, 2433–2445,
2014.
Breivik, Ø., Mogensen, K., Bidlot, J., Balmaseda, M., and Janssen, P. A.
E. M.: Surface wave effects in the NEMO ocean model: Forced and coupled
experiments, J. Geophys. Res., 120, 2973–2992,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JC010565, 2015.
Breivik, Ø., Bidlot, J.-R., and Janssen, P. A.: A Stokes drift
approximation based on the Phillips spectrum, Ocean Model., 100, 49–56,
2016.
Charnock, H.: Wind stress on a water surface, Q. J. Roy.
Meteor. Soc., 81, 639–640,
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49708135027, 1955.
China Argo Real-time Data Center: Argo Observational Profiles of T&S, China Argo Real-time Data Center [data set], http://www.argo.org.cn/index.php?m=content&c=index&a=lists&catid=100, 2022.
Couvelard, X., Lemarié, F., Samson, G., Redelsperger, J.-L., Ardhuin, F., Benshila, R., and Madec, G.: Development of a two-way-coupled ocean–wave model: assessment on a global NEMO(v3.6)–WW3(v6.02) coupled configuration, Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 3067–3090, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3067-2020, 2020.
de Boyer Montégut, C., Madec, G., Fischer, A. S., Lazar, A., and
Iudicone, D.: Mixed layer depth over the global ocean: An examination of
profile data and a profile-based climatology, J. Geophys.
Res., 109, C12003, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JC002378, 2004.
Donelan, M. A., Haus, B. K., Reul, N., Plant, W. J., Stiassnie, M., Graber,
H. C., Brown, O. B., and Saltzman, E. S.: On the limiting aerodynamic
roughness of the ocean in very strong winds, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
31, L18306, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004gl019460, 2004.
Drennan, W. M., Graber, H. C., Hauser, D., and Quentin, C.: On the wave age
dependence of wind stress over pure wind seas, J. Geophys. Res., 108,
8062, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JC000715, 2003.
Drennan, W. M., Taylor, P. K., and Yelland, M. J.: Parameterizing the sea
surface roughness, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 35, 835–848, 2005.
ECMWF: Official IFS Documentation CY47R1, In chap. PART VII: ECMWF wave
model, ECMWF, Reading, UK, https://doi.org/10.21957/31drbygag, 2020.
Fan, Y., Lin, S., Held, I. M., Yu, Z., and Tolman, H. L.: Global Ocean
Surface Wave Simulation Using a Coupled Atmosphere-Wave Model, J.
Climate, 25, 6233–6252, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00621.1, 2012.
Ghantous, M. and Babanin, A. V.: One-dimensional modelling of upper ocean mixing by turbulence due to wave orbital motion, Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 21, 325–338, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-21-325-2014, 2014.
Griffies, S. M., Harrison, M. J., Pacanowski, R. C., and Rosati, A.: A technical guide to MOM4, GFDL Ocean Group Tech. Rep, 5, 1–342, https://www.gfdl.noaa.gov/bibliography/related_files/smg0301.pdf (last access: 20 January 2022), 2004.
Hasselmann, K.: Wave-driven inertial oscillations, Geophys.
Astro. Fluid, 1, 463–502,
https://doi.org/10.1080/03091927009365783, 1970.
Hersbach H. and Bidlot, J.-R.: The relevance of ocean surface current in the ECMWF analysis and forecast system. Proceeding from the ECMWF Workshop on Atmosphere-Ocean Interaction, Shinfield Park, Reading, 10–12 November 2008, 61–73, https://www.ecmwf.int/sites/default/files/elibrary/2009/9866-relevance-ocean-surface-current-ecmwf-analysis-and-forecast-system.pdf (last access: 20 January 2022), 2008.
Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Biavati, G., Horányi, A., Muñoz Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Rozum, I., Schepers, D., Simmons, A., Soci, C., Dee, D., Thépaut, J.-N.: ERA5 hourly data on single levels from 1979 to present, Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) Climate Data Store (CDS) [data set], https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.adbb2d47, 2018.
Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Hirahara, S., Horányi, A., Muñoz-Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Schepers, D., Simmons, A., Soci, C., Abdalla, S., Abellan, X., Balsamo, G., Bechtold, P., Biavati, G., Bidlot, J., Bonavita, M., De Chiara, G., Dahlgren, P., Dee, D., Diamantakis, M., Dragani, R., Flemming, J., Forbes, R., Fuentes, M., Geer, A., Haimberger, L., Healy, S., Hogan, R. J., Hólm, E., Janisková, M., Keeley, S., Laloyaux, P., Lopez, P., Lupu, C., Radnoti, G., de Rosnay, P., Rozum, I., Vamborg, F., Villaume, S., and Thépaut, J.-N.: The ERA5 global reanalysis, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 146, 1999–2049, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803, 2020.
Hsu, S. A., Meindl, E. A., and Gilhousen, D. B.: Determining the
Power-Law Wind-Profile Exponent under Near-Neutral Stability Conditions at
Sea, Applied Meteorology, 33, 757–765,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1994)033<0757:DTPLWP>2.0.CO;2, 1994.
Janssen, P. A. E. M.: Wave-induced stress and the drag of air flow over sea
waves, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 19, 745–754, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1989)019<0745:WISATD>2.0.CO;2, 1989.
Janssen, P. A. E. M.: The Quasi-linear theory of wind wave generation
applied to wave forecasting, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 21, 1631–1642,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1991)021<1631:QLTOWW>2.0.CO;2, 1991.
Janssen, P. A. E. M. (Ed.): The interaction of ocean waves and wind, Cambridge University Press, 1st edn., 312 pp., ISBN 0521465400, 2004.
Kalnay, E., Kanamitsu, M., Kistler, R., Collins, W. D., Deaven, D. G.,
Gandin, L. S., Iredell, M. D., Saha, S., White, G. H., and Woollen, J.: The
NCEP/NCAR 40-Year Reanalysis Project, B. Am.
Meteorol. Soc., 77, 437–471,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1996)077<0437:TNYRP>2.0.CO;2,
1996.
Kalverla, P. C., Holtslag, A. A. M., Ronda, R. J., and Steeneveld, G.-J.:
Quality of wind characteristics in recent wind atlases over the North Sea,
Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 146, 1498–1515,
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3748, 2020.
Kukulka, T., Plueddemann, A. J., Trowbridge, J. H., and Sullivan, P. P.:
Significance of Langmuir circulation in upper ocean mixing: comparison of
observations and simulations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L10603,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL037620, 2009.
Law-Chune, S. and Aouf, L.: Wave effects in global ocean modeling:
parametrizations vs. forcing from a wave model, Ocean Dynam., 68,
1739–1758, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-018-1220-2, 2018.
Lemarié, F.: Numerical modification of atmospheric models to include the
feedback of oceanic currents on air-sea fluxes in ocean-atmosphere coupled
models, INRIA Grenoble-Rhône-Alpes, Laboratoire Jean Kuntzmann,
https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01184711/document (last access: 20 January 2022), 2015.
Li, D., Staneva, J., Bidlot, J.-R., Grayek, S., Zhu, Y., and Yin, B.:
Improving Regional Model Skills During Typhoon Events: A Case Study for
Super Typhoon Lingling Over the Northwest Pacific Ocean, Frontiers in Marine
Science, 8, 613913, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.613913, 2021.
Li, M. and Garrett, C.: Mixed Layer Deepening Due to Langmuir Circulation,
J. Phys. Oceanogr., 27, 121–132,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1997)027<0121:MLDDTL>2.0.CO;2,
1997.
Li, Q., Webb, A., Foxkemper, B., Craig, A., Danabasoglu, G., Large, W. G.,
and Vertenstein, M.: Langmuir mixing effects on global climate: WAVEWATCH
III in CESM, Ocean Model., 103, 145–160,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2015.07.020, 2016.
Li, Q., Foxkemper, B., Breivik, O., and Webb, A.: Statistical models of
global Langmuir mixing, Ocean Model., 113, 95–114,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2017.03.016, 2017.
Li, Z., Liu, Z., and Xing, X.: User Manual for Global Argo Observational
data set (V3.0) (1997–2019), China Argo Real-time Data Center, Hangzhou,
37 pp., http://www.argo.org.cn/uploadfile/file/20191127/20191127111149_33345.pdf (last access: 20 January 2022), 2019.
Liu, L., Zhang, C., Li, R., Wang, B., and Yang, G.: C-Coupler2: a flexible and user-friendly community coupler for model coupling and nesting, Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 3557–3586, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3557-2018, 2018.
Luo, J. J., Masson, S., Roeckner, E., Madec, G., and Yamagata, T.: Reducing
climatology Bias in an ocean-atmosphere CGCM with improved coupling physics,
J. Climate, 18, 2344–2360, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3404.1,
2005.
McWilliams, J. C. and Sullivan, P. P.: Vertical Mixing by Langmuir
Circulations, Spill Sci. Technol. B., 6, 225–237,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1353-2561(01)00041-X, 2000.
Monin, A. S. and Obukhov, A. M.: Basic laws of turbulent mixing in the
surface layer of the atmosphere, Contrib. Geophys. Inst. Acad. Sci. USSR,
151, e187, https://moodle2.units.it/pluginfile.php/267453/mod_resource/content/1/ABL_lecture_13.pdf (last access: 20 January 2022), 1954.
Moon, I., Ginis, I., and Hara, T.: Effect of surface waves on Charnock
coefficient under tropical cyclones, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L20302,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL020988, 2004.
Moum, J. N. and Smyth, W. D.: Upper Ocean Mixing, in: Encyclopedia of Ocean
Sciences, 3rd edn., vol. 1, edited by: Cochran, J. K.,
Bokuniewicz, J. H., and Yager, L. P., Elsevier, 71–79, ISBN 978-0-12-813081-0,
2019.
National Centers for Environmental Information: Optimum Interpolation SST, National Centers for Environmental Information [data set], https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oisst, 2022.
NOAA: National Data Buoy Center, NOAA [data set], https://www.ndbc.noaa.gov, 2022a.
NOAA: CFSv2.0 Initial Fields, NOAA [data set], https://nomads.ncep.noaa.gov/pub/data/nccf/com/cfs/prod, 2022b.
O'Neill, L. W., Chelton, D. B., and Esbensen, S. K.: Observations of
SST-induced perturbations of the wind stress field over the Southern Ocean
on seasonal timescales, J. Climate, 16, 2340–2354, https://doi.org/10.1175/2780.1,
2003.
Pineau-Guillou, L., Ardhuin, F., Bouin, M. N., Redelsperger, J. L., Chapron, B.,
Bidlot, J. R., and Quilfen, Y.: Strong winds in a coupled wave-atmosphere
model during a North Atlantic storm event: evaluation against observations,
Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 144, 317–332,
2018.
Polonichko, V.: Generation of Langmuir circulation for nonaligned wind
stress and the Stokes drift, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 15773–15780,
https://doi.org/10.1029/97JC00460, 1997.
Powell, M. D., Vickery, P. J., and Reinhold, T. A.: Reduced drag coefficient
for high wind speeds in tropical cyclones, Nature, 422, 279–283,
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01481, 2003.
Qiao, F., Yuan, Y., Yang, Y., Zheng, Q., Xia, C., and Ma, J.: Wave-induced
mixing in the upper ocean: Distribution and application to a global ocean
circulation model, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L11303,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL019824, 2004.
Renault, L., Molemaker, M. J., McWilliams, J. C., Shchepetkin, A. F.,
Lemarie, F., Chelton, D., Illig, S., and Hall, A.: Modulation of Wind Work
by Oceanic Current Interaction with the Atmosphere, J. Phys.
Oceanogr., 46, 1685–1704, https://doi.org/10.1175/jpo-d-15-0232.1, 2016.
Renault, L., Arsouze, T., and Ballabrera-Poy, J.: On the Influence of the
Current Feedback to the Atmosphere on the Western Mediterranean Sea
Dynamics, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 126, e2020JC016664, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020jc016664,
2021.
Reynolds, R. W., Smith, T. M., Liu, C., Chelton, D. B., Casey, K. S., and
Schlax, M. G.: Daily High-Resolution-Blended Analyses for Sea Surface
Temperature, J. Climate, 20, 5473–5496,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JCLI1824.1, 2007.
Saha, S., Moorthi, S., Pan, H., Wu, X., Wang, J., Nadiga, S., Tripp, P.,
Kistler, R., Woollen, J., and Behringer, D.: The NCEP Climate Forecast
System Reanalysis, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 91,
1015–1057, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010BAMS3001.1, 2010.
Saha, S., Moorthi, S., Wu, X., Wang, J., Nadiga, S., Tripp, P., Behringer,
D., Hou, Y., Chuang, H., and Iredell, M. D.: The NCEP Climate Forecast
System Version 2, J. Climate, 27, 2185–2208,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00823.1, 2014.
Sauvage, C., Lebeaupin Brossier, C., Bouin, M.-N., and Ducrocq, V.: Characterization of the air–sea exchange mechanisms during a Mediterranean heavy precipitation event using realistic sea state modelling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 1675–1699, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-1675-2020, 2020.
Sharmar, V. and Markina, M.: Validation of global wind wave hindcasts using
ERA5, MERRA2, ERA-Interim and CFSRv2 reanalyzes, IOP C. Ser.
Earth Env., 606, 012056, https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/606/1/012056, 2020.
Shi, R., Xu, F., Liu, L., Fan, Z., and Yu, H.: The Effects of Ocean Surface Waves on Global Forecast in CFS Modeling System v2.0, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5811002, 2021.
Shimura, T., Mori, N., Takemi, T., and Mizuta, R.: Long term impacts of ocean wave-dependent roughness on global climate systems, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 122, 1995–2011, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JC012621, 2017.
Stopa, J. E., Ardhuin, F., Babanin, A. V., and Zieger, S.: Comparison and
validation of physical wave parameterizations in spectral wave models, Ocean
Model., 103, 2–17, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2015.09.003, 2016.
Sweet, W., Fett, R., Kerling, J., and Laviolette, P.: Air-sea interaction
effects in the lower troposphere across the north wall of the Gulf Stream,
Mon. Weather Rev., 109, 1042–1052, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1981)109<1042:Asieit>2.0.Co;2, 1981.
Takatama, K. and Schneider, N.: The Role of Back Pressure in the
Atmospheric Response to Surface Stress Induced by the Kuroshio, J.
Atmos. Sci., 74, 597–615, https://doi.org/10.1175/jas-d-16-0149.1, 2017.
Taylor, P. K. and Yelland, M. J.: The Dependence of Sea Surface Roughness
on the Height and Steepness of the Waves, J. Phys. Oceanogr.,
31, 572–590,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(2001)031<0572:TDOSSR>2.0.CO;2,
2001.
Terray, E. A., Donelan, M. A., Agrawal, Y. C., Drennan, W. M., Kahma, K. K.,
Williams, A. J., Hwang, P. A., and Kitaigorodskii, S. A.: Estimates of
Kinetic Energy Dissipation under Breaking Waves, J. Phys.
Oceanogr., 26, 792–807,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1996)026<0792:EOKEDU>2.0.CO;2,
1996.
Tolman, H. L. and Chalikov, D. V.: Source Terms in a Third-Generation Wind
Wave Model, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 26, 2497–2518,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1996)026<2497:STIATG>2.0.CO;2,
1996.
Van Roekel, L. P., Foxkemper, B., Sullivan, P. P., Hamlington, P. E., and
Haney, S.: The form and orientation of Langmuir cells for misaligned winds
and waves, J. Geophys. Res., 117, C05001,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JC007516, 2012.
Wang, L. and Xu, F.: Decadal variability and trends of oceanic barrier
layers in tropical Pacific, Ocean Dynam., 68, 1155–1168,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-018-1191-3, 2018.
WAVEWATCH III Development Group: User manual and system documentation of WAVEWATCH III version 5.16, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Camp Springs, US, NOAA/NWS/NCEP/MMAB Technical Note 329, 1–361, https://polar.ncep.noaa.gov/waves/wavewatch/manual.v5.16.pdf (last access: 20 January 2022), 2016.
Wu, L., Staneva, J., Breivik, Ø., Rutgersson, A., Nurser, A. G.,
Clementi, E., and Madec, G.: Wave effects on coastal upwelling and water
level, Ocean Model., 140, 101405, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2019.101405, 2019.
Wu, X., K. S. Moorthi, K. Okomoto, and H. L. Pan: Sea ice impacts on GFS
forecasts at high latitudes, Proceedings of the 85th AMS Annual Meeting, 8th
Conference on Polar Meteorology and Oceanography, San Diego, CA, 12 January 2005, 7.4, https://ams.confex.com/ams/Annual2005/techprogram/paper_84292.htm (last access: 20 January 2022), 2005.
Zieger, S., Babanin, A. V., Rogers, W. E., and Young, I. R.:
Observation-based source terms in the third-generation wave model WAVEWATCH,
Ocean Model., 96, 2–25, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2015.07.014,
2015.
Short summary
To better understand the effects of surface waves on global intraseasonal prediction, we incorporated the WW3 model into CFSv2.0. Processes of Langmuir mixing, Stokes–Coriolis force with entrainment, air–sea fluxes modified by Stokes drift, and momentum roughness length were considered. Results from two groups of 56 d experiments show that overestimated sea surface temperature, 2 m air temperature, 10 m wind, wave height, and underestimated mixed layer from the original CFSv2.0 are improved.
To better understand the effects of surface waves on global intraseasonal prediction, we...
