Articles | Volume 15, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-1735-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-1735-2022
Development and technical paper
 | 
02 Mar 2022
Development and technical paper |  | 02 Mar 2022

Calibrating the soil organic carbon model Yasso20 with multiple datasets

Toni Viskari, Janne Pusa, Istem Fer, Anna Repo, Julius Vira, and Jari Liski

Related authors

Implementation and initial calibration of carbon-13 soil organic matter decomposition in the Yasso model
Jarmo Mäkelä, Laura Arppe, Hannu Fritze, Jussi Heinonsalo, Kristiina Karhu, Jari Liski, Markku Oinonen, Petra Straková, and Toni Viskari
Biogeosciences, 19, 4305–4313, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-4305-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-4305-2022, 2022
Short summary
Implementation of mycorrhizal mechanisms into soil carbon model improves the prediction of long-term processes of plant litter decomposition
Weilin Huang, Peter M. van Bodegom, Toni Viskari, Jari Liski, and Nadejda A. Soudzilovskaia
Biogeosciences, 19, 1469–1490, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-1469-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-1469-2022, 2022
Short summary
Towards agricultural soil carbon monitoring, reporting, and verification through the Field Observatory Network (FiON)
Olli Nevalainen, Olli Niemitalo, Istem Fer, Antti Juntunen, Tuomas Mattila, Olli Koskela, Joni Kukkamäki, Layla Höckerstedt, Laura Mäkelä, Pieta Jarva, Laura Heimsch, Henriikka Vekuri, Liisa Kulmala, Åsa Stam, Otto Kuusela, Stephanie Gerin, Toni Viskari, Julius Vira, Jari Hyväluoma, Juha-Pekka Tuovinen, Annalea Lohila, Tuomas Laurila, Jussi Heinonsalo, Tuula Aalto, Iivari Kunttu, and Jari Liski
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 11, 93–109, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-11-93-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-11-93-2022, 2022
Short summary
Cutting out the middleman: calibrating and validating a dynamic vegetation model (ED2-PROSPECT5) using remotely sensed surface reflectance
Alexey N. Shiklomanov, Michael C. Dietze, Istem Fer, Toni Viskari, and Shawn P. Serbin
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 2603–2633, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-2603-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-2603-2021, 2021
Short summary
Improving Yasso15 soil carbon model estimates with ensemble adjustment Kalman filter state data assimilation
Toni Viskari, Maisa Laine, Liisa Kulmala, Jarmo Mäkelä, Istem Fer, and Jari Liski
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 5959–5971, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5959-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5959-2020, 2020
Short summary

Related subject area

Biogeosciences
Dynamic ecosystem assembly and escaping the “fire trap” in the tropics: insights from FATES_15.0.0
Jacquelyn K. Shuman, Rosie A. Fisher, Charles Koven, Ryan Knox, Lara Kueppers, and Chonggang Xu
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4643–4671, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4643-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4643-2024, 2024
Short summary
In silico calculation of soil pH by SCEPTER v1.0
Yoshiki Kanzaki, Isabella Chiaravalloti, Shuang Zhang, Noah J. Planavsky, and Christopher T. Reinhard
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4515–4532, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4515-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4515-2024, 2024
Short summary
Simple process-led algorithms for simulating habitats (SPLASH v.2.0): robust calculations of water and energy fluxes
David Sandoval, Iain Colin Prentice, and Rodolfo L. B. Nóbrega
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4229–4309, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4229-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4229-2024, 2024
Short summary
A global behavioural model of human fire use and management: WHAM! v1.0
Oliver Perkins, Matthew Kasoar, Apostolos Voulgarakis, Cathy Smith, Jay Mistry, and James D. A. Millington
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3993–4016, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3993-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3993-2024, 2024
Short summary
Terrestrial Ecosystem Model in R (TEMIR) version 1.0: simulating ecophysiological responses of vegetation to atmospheric chemical and meteorological changes
Amos P. K. Tai, David H. Y. Yung, and Timothy Lam
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3733–3764, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3733-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3733-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Abramoff, R., Xiaofeng, X., Hartmann, M., O'Brien, S., Feng, W., Davidson, E., Finzi, A., Moorhead, D., Schimel, J., Torn, M., and Mayes, M. A.: The Millennial model: in search of measurable pools and transformations for modeling soil carbon in the new century, Biogeochemistry, 137, 51–71, 2018. 
Berg, B., Hannus, K., Popoff, T., and Theander, P.: Changes in organic components of litter during decomposition. Long term decomposition in a Scots pine forest, I. Can. J. Bot., 60, 1310–1319, 1982. 
Berg, B., Booltink, H., Breymeyer, A., Ewertsson, A., Gallardo, A., Holm, B., Johansson, M. B., Koivuoja, S., Meentemeyer, V., Nyman, P., Olofsson, J., Pettersson, A. S., Reurslag, A., Staaf, H., Staaf, I., and Uba, L.: Data on Needle Litter Decomposition and Soil Climate as Well as Site Characteristics for Some Coniferous Forest Sites, Part II, Decomposition Data. Report 42, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Ecology and Environmental Research, Uppsala, 1991b. 
Download
Short summary
We wanted to examine how the chosen measurement data and calibration process affect soil organic carbon model calibration. In our results we found that there is a benefit in using data from multiple litter-bag decomposition experiments simultaneously, even with the required assumptions. Additionally, due to the amount of noise and uncertainties in the system, more advanced calibration methods should be used to parameterize the models.