Journal cover Journal topic
Geoscientific Model Development An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

IF value: 5.240
IF5.240
IF 5-year value: 5.768
IF 5-year
5.768
CiteScore value: 8.9
CiteScore
8.9
SNIP value: 1.713
SNIP1.713
IPP value: 5.53
IPP5.53
SJR value: 3.18
SJR3.18
Scimago H <br class='widget-line-break'>index value: 71
Scimago H
index
71
h5-index value: 51
h5-index51
Volume 11, issue 2
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 681–696, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-681-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Special issue: Nucleus for European Modelling of the Ocean - NEMO

Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 681–696, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-681-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Model description paper 22 Feb 2018

Model description paper | 22 Feb 2018

AMM15: a new high-resolution NEMO configuration for operational simulation of the European north-west shelf

Jennifer A. Graham et al.

Related authors

Storm-driven across-shelf oceanic flows into coastal waters
Sam Jones, Mark Inall, Marie Porter, Jennifer A. Graham, and Finlo Cottier
Ocean Sci., 16, 389–403, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-16-389-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/os-16-389-2020, 2020
Short summary
The impact of a new high-resolution ocean model on the Met Office North-West European Shelf forecasting system
Marina Tonani, Peter Sykes, Robert R. King, Niall McConnell, Anne-Christine Péquignet, Enda O'Dea, Jennifer A. Graham, Jeff Polton, and John Siddorn
Ocean Sci., 15, 1133–1158, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-15-1133-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/os-15-1133-2019, 2019
Short summary
The UKC3 regional coupled environmental prediction system
Huw W. Lewis, Juan Manuel Castillo Sanchez, Alex Arnold, Joachim Fallmann, Andrew Saulter, Jennifer Graham, Mike Bush, John Siddorn, Tamzin Palmer, Adrian Lock, John Edwards, Lucy Bricheno, Alberto Martínez-de la Torre, and James Clark
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 2357–2400, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2357-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2357-2019, 2019
Short summary
The UKC2 regional coupled environmental prediction system
Huw W. Lewis, Juan Manuel Castillo Sanchez, Jennifer Graham, Andrew Saulter, Jorge Bornemann, Alex Arnold, Joachim Fallmann, Chris Harris, David Pearson, Steven Ramsdale, Alberto Martínez-de la Torre, Lucy Bricheno, Eleanor Blyth, Victoria A. Bell, Helen Davies, Toby R. Marthews, Clare O'Neill, Heather Rumbold, Enda O'Dea, Ashley Brereton, Karen Guihou, Adrian Hines, Momme Butenschon, Simon J. Dadson, Tamzin Palmer, Jason Holt, Nick Reynard, Martin Best, John Edwards, and John Siddorn
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 1–42, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1-2018, 2018
Short summary

Related subject area

Oceanography
Numerical integrators for Lagrangian oceanography
Tor Nordam and Rodrigo Duran
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 5935–5957, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5935-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5935-2020, 2020
Short summary
Multi-grid algorithm for passive tracer transport in the NEMO ocean circulation model: a case study with the NEMO OGCM (version 3.6)
Clément Bricaud, Julien Le Sommer, Gurvan Madec, Christophe Calone, Julie Deshayes, Christian Ethe, Jérôme Chanut, and Marina Levy
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 5465–5483, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5465-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5465-2020, 2020
Short summary
Introducing LAB60: A 1∕60° NEMO 3.6 numerical simulation of the Labrador Sea
Clark Pennelly and Paul G. Myers
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 4959–4975, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4959-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4959-2020, 2020
Short summary
Impact of horizontal resolution on global ocean–sea ice model simulations based on the experimental protocols of the Ocean Model Intercomparison Project phase 2 (OMIP-2)
Eric P. Chassignet, Stephen G. Yeager, Baylor Fox-Kemper, Alexandra Bozec, Frederic Castruccio, Gokhan Danabasoglu, Christopher Horvat, Who M. Kim, Nikolay Koldunov, Yiwen Li, Pengfei Lin, Hailong Liu, Dmitry V. Sein, Dmitry Sidorenko, Qiang Wang, and Xiaobiao Xu
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 4595–4637, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4595-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4595-2020, 2020
Short summary
CSIRO Environmental Modelling Suite (EMS): scientific description of the optical and biogeochemical models (vB3p0)
Mark E. Baird, Karen A. Wild-Allen, John Parslow, Mathieu Mongin, Barbara Robson, Jennifer Skerratt, Farhan Rizwi, Monika Soja-Woźniak, Emlyn Jones, Mike Herzfeld, Nugzar Margvelashvili, John Andrewartha, Clothilde Langlais, Matthew P. Adams, Nagur Cherukuru, Malin Gustafsson, Scott Hadley, Peter J. Ralph, Uwe Rosebrock, Thomas Schroeder, Leonardo Laiolo, Daniel Harrison, and Andrew D. L. Steven
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 4503–4553, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4503-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4503-2020, 2020
Short summary

Cited articles

Aslam, T., Hall, R. A., and Dye, S. R.: Internal tides in a dendritic submarine canyon, Prog. Oceanogr., https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2017.10.005, in press, 2017.
Badin, G., Williams, R. G., Holt, J. T., and Fernand, L. J.: Are mesoscale eddies in shelf seas formed by baroclinic instability of tidal fronts?, J. Geophys. Res., 114, C10021, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JC005340, 2009.
Batstone, C., Lawless, M., Tawn, J., Horsburgh, K., Blackman, D., McMillan, A., Worth, D., Laeger, S., and Hunt, T.: A UK best-practice approach for extreme sea level analysis along complex topographic coastlines, Ocean Eng., 71, 28–39, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2013.02.003i, 2013.
Beckmann, A. C. and Döscher, R.: A Method for Improved Representation of Dense Water Spreading over Topography in Geopotential-Coordinate Models, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 27, 581–591, 1997.
Belcher, S., Grant, A., Hanley, K., Fox-Kemper, B., Van Roekel, L., Sullivan, P., Large, W., Brown, A., Hines, A., Calvert, D., Rutgersson, A., Pettersson, H., Bidlot, J.-R., Janssen, P., and Polton, J.: A global perspective on Langmuir turbulence in the ocean surface boundary layer, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L18605, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012gl052932, 2012.
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
This paper describes the next-generation ocean forecast model for the European NW shelf, AMM15 (Atlantic Margin Model, 1.5 km resolution). The current forecast system has a resolution of 7 km. While this is sufficient to represent large-scale circulation, many dynamical features (such as eddies, frontal jets, and internal tides) can only begin to be resolved at 0–1 km resolution. Here we introduce AMM15 and demonstrate its ability to represent the mean state and variability of the region.
This paper describes the next-generation ocean forecast model for the European NW shelf, AMM15...
Citation