Articles | Volume 11, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1181-2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1181-2018
Methods for assessment of models
 | 
29 Mar 2018
Methods for assessment of models |  | 29 Mar 2018

Error assessment of biogeochemical models by lower bound methods (NOMMA-1.0)

Volkmar Sauerland, Ulrike Löptien, Claudine Leonhard, Andreas Oschlies, and Anand Srivastav

Related authors

Calibrating a global three-dimensional biogeochemical ocean model (MOPS-1.0)
Iris Kriest, Volkmar Sauerland, Samar Khatiwala, Anand Srivastav, and Andreas Oschlies
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 127–154, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-127-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-127-2017, 2017
Short summary

Related subject area

Biogeosciences
Simulating the drought response of European tree species with the dynamic vegetation model LPJ-GUESS (v4.1, 97c552c5)
Benjamin F. Meyer, João P. Darela-Filho, Konstantin Gregor, Allan Buras, Qiao-Lin Gu, Andreas Krause, Daijun Liu, Phillip Papastefanou, Sijeh Asuk, Thorsten E. E. Grams, Christian S. Zang, and Anja Rammig
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4643–4666, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4643-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4643-2025, 2025
Short summary
pyVPRM: a next-generation vegetation photosynthesis and respiration model for the post-MODIS era
Theo Glauch, Julia Marshall, Christoph Gerbig, Santiago Botía, Michał Gałkowski, Sanam N. Vardag, and André Butz
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4713–4742, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4713-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4713-2025, 2025
Short summary
Emulating grid-based forest carbon dynamics using machine learning: an LPJ-GUESS v4.1.1 application
Carolina Natel, David Martín Belda, Peter Anthoni, Neele Haß, Sam Rabin, and Almut Arneth
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4317–4333, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4317-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4317-2025, 2025
Short summary
ELM2.1-XGBfire1.0: improving wildfire prediction by integrating a machine learning fire model in a land surface model
Ye Liu, Huilin Huang, Sing-Chun Wang, Tao Zhang, Donghui Xu, and Yang Chen
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4103–4117, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4103-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4103-2025, 2025
Short summary
Development and assessment of the physical–biogeochemical ocean regional model in the Northwest Pacific: NPRT v1.0 (ROMS v3.9–TOPAZ v2.0)
Daehyuk Kim, Hyun-Chae Jung, Jae-Hong Moon, and Na-Hyeon Lee
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 3941–3964, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3941-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3941-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Anderson, T.: Plankton functional type modelling: running before we can walk?, J. Plankton Res., 27, 1073–1081, https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fbi076, 2005.
Aumont, O., Ethé, C., Tagliabue, A., Bopp, L., and Gehlen, M.: PISCES-v2: an ocean biogeochemical model for carbon and ecosystem studies, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 2465–2513, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2465-2015, 2015.
Barlow, R. E., Bartholomew, D. J., Bremner, J. M., and Brunk, H. D.: Statistical Inference under Order Restrictions, Theory and Application of Isotonic Regression, Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics, John Wiley & Sons, London, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9574.1973.tb00228.x, 1972.
Boyd, S. and Vandenberghe, L.: Convex optimization, Cambridge University Press, 2004.
Brovkin, V., Petoukhov, V., Claussen, M., Bauer, E., Archer, D., and Jaeger, C.: Geoengineering climate by stratospheric sulfur injections: Earth system vulnerability to technological failure, Climatic Change, 92, 243–259, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-008-9490-1, 2009.
Download
Short summary
We present a concept to prove that a parametric model is well calibrated, i.e., that changes of its free parameters cannot lead to a much better model–data misfit anymore. The intention is motivated by the fact that calibrating global biogeochemical ocean models is important for assessment and inter-model comparison but computationally expensive.
Share