Articles | Volume 11, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1181-2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1181-2018
Methods for assessment of models
 | 
29 Mar 2018
Methods for assessment of models |  | 29 Mar 2018

Error assessment of biogeochemical models by lower bound methods (NOMMA-1.0)

Volkmar Sauerland, Ulrike Löptien, Claudine Leonhard, Andreas Oschlies, and Anand Srivastav

Related authors

Calibrating a global three-dimensional biogeochemical ocean model (MOPS-1.0)
Iris Kriest, Volkmar Sauerland, Samar Khatiwala, Anand Srivastav, and Andreas Oschlies
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 127–154, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-127-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-127-2017, 2017
Short summary

Related subject area

Biogeosciences
Sources of uncertainty in the SPITFIRE global fire model: development of LPJmL-SPITFIRE1.9 and directions for future improvements
Luke Oberhagemann, Maik Billing, Werner von Bloh, Markus Drüke, Matthew Forrest, Simon P. K. Bowring, Jessica Hetzer, Jaime Ribalaygua Batalla, and Kirsten Thonicke
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2021–2050, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2021-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2021-2025, 2025
Short summary
The unicellular NUM v.0.91: a trait-based plankton model evaluated in two contrasting biogeographic provinces
Trine Frisbæk Hansen, Donald Eugene Canfield, Ken Haste Andersen, and Christian Jannik Bjerrum
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1895–1916, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1895-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1895-2025, 2025
Short summary
FESOM2.1-REcoM3-MEDUSA2: an ocean–sea ice–biogeochemistry model coupled to a sediment model
Ying Ye, Guy Munhoven, Peter Köhler, Martin Butzin, Judith Hauck, Özgür Gürses, and Christoph Völker
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 977–1000, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-977-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-977-2025, 2025
Short summary
Satellite-based modeling of wetland methane emissions on a global scale (SatWetCH4 1.0)
Juliette Bernard, Elodie Salmon, Marielle Saunois, Shushi Peng, Penélope Serrano-Ortiz, Antoine Berchet, Palingamoorthy Gnanamoorthy, Joachim Jansen, and Philippe Ciais
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 863–883, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-863-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-863-2025, 2025
Short summary
Systematic underestimation of type-specific ecosystem process variability in the Community Land Model v5 over Europe
Christian Poppe Terán, Bibi S. Naz, Harry Vereecken, Roland Baatz, Rosie A. Fisher, and Harrie-Jan Hendricks Franssen
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 287–317, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-287-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-287-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Anderson, T.: Plankton functional type modelling: running before we can walk?, J. Plankton Res., 27, 1073–1081, https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fbi076, 2005.
Aumont, O., Ethé, C., Tagliabue, A., Bopp, L., and Gehlen, M.: PISCES-v2: an ocean biogeochemical model for carbon and ecosystem studies, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 2465–2513, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2465-2015, 2015.
Barlow, R. E., Bartholomew, D. J., Bremner, J. M., and Brunk, H. D.: Statistical Inference under Order Restrictions, Theory and Application of Isotonic Regression, Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics, John Wiley & Sons, London, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9574.1973.tb00228.x, 1972.
Boyd, S. and Vandenberghe, L.: Convex optimization, Cambridge University Press, 2004.
Brovkin, V., Petoukhov, V., Claussen, M., Bauer, E., Archer, D., and Jaeger, C.: Geoengineering climate by stratospheric sulfur injections: Earth system vulnerability to technological failure, Climatic Change, 92, 243–259, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-008-9490-1, 2009.
Download
Short summary
We present a concept to prove that a parametric model is well calibrated, i.e., that changes of its free parameters cannot lead to a much better model–data misfit anymore. The intention is motivated by the fact that calibrating global biogeochemical ocean models is important for assessment and inter-model comparison but computationally expensive.
Share