Articles | Volume 11, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1181-2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1181-2018
Methods for assessment of models
 | 
29 Mar 2018
Methods for assessment of models |  | 29 Mar 2018

Error assessment of biogeochemical models by lower bound methods (NOMMA-1.0)

Volkmar Sauerland, Ulrike Löptien, Claudine Leonhard, Andreas Oschlies, and Anand Srivastav

Related authors

Calibrating a global three-dimensional biogeochemical ocean model (MOPS-1.0)
Iris Kriest, Volkmar Sauerland, Samar Khatiwala, Anand Srivastav, and Andreas Oschlies
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 127–154, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-127-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-127-2017, 2017
Short summary

Related subject area

Biogeosciences
Dynamic ecosystem assembly and escaping the “fire trap” in the tropics: insights from FATES_15.0.0
Jacquelyn K. Shuman, Rosie A. Fisher, Charles Koven, Ryan Knox, Lara Kueppers, and Chonggang Xu
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4643–4671, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4643-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4643-2024, 2024
Short summary
In silico calculation of soil pH by SCEPTER v1.0
Yoshiki Kanzaki, Isabella Chiaravalloti, Shuang Zhang, Noah J. Planavsky, and Christopher T. Reinhard
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4515–4532, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4515-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4515-2024, 2024
Short summary
Simple process-led algorithms for simulating habitats (SPLASH v.2.0): robust calculations of water and energy fluxes
David Sandoval, Iain Colin Prentice, and Rodolfo L. B. Nóbrega
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4229–4309, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4229-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4229-2024, 2024
Short summary
A global behavioural model of human fire use and management: WHAM! v1.0
Oliver Perkins, Matthew Kasoar, Apostolos Voulgarakis, Cathy Smith, Jay Mistry, and James D. A. Millington
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3993–4016, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3993-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3993-2024, 2024
Short summary
Terrestrial Ecosystem Model in R (TEMIR) version 1.0: simulating ecophysiological responses of vegetation to atmospheric chemical and meteorological changes
Amos P. K. Tai, David H. Y. Yung, and Timothy Lam
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3733–3764, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3733-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3733-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Anderson, T.: Plankton functional type modelling: running before we can walk?, J. Plankton Res., 27, 1073–1081, https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fbi076, 2005.
Aumont, O., Ethé, C., Tagliabue, A., Bopp, L., and Gehlen, M.: PISCES-v2: an ocean biogeochemical model for carbon and ecosystem studies, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 2465–2513, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2465-2015, 2015.
Barlow, R. E., Bartholomew, D. J., Bremner, J. M., and Brunk, H. D.: Statistical Inference under Order Restrictions, Theory and Application of Isotonic Regression, Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics, John Wiley & Sons, London, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9574.1973.tb00228.x, 1972.
Boyd, S. and Vandenberghe, L.: Convex optimization, Cambridge University Press, 2004.
Brovkin, V., Petoukhov, V., Claussen, M., Bauer, E., Archer, D., and Jaeger, C.: Geoengineering climate by stratospheric sulfur injections: Earth system vulnerability to technological failure, Climatic Change, 92, 243–259, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-008-9490-1, 2009.
Download
Short summary
We present a concept to prove that a parametric model is well calibrated, i.e., that changes of its free parameters cannot lead to a much better model–data misfit anymore. The intention is motivated by the fact that calibrating global biogeochemical ocean models is important for assessment and inter-model comparison but computationally expensive.