Journal cover Journal topic
Geoscientific Model Development An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

IF value: 5.240
IF5.240
IF 5-year value: 5.768
IF 5-year
5.768
CiteScore value: 8.9
CiteScore
8.9
SNIP value: 1.713
SNIP1.713
IPP value: 5.53
IPP5.53
SJR value: 3.18
SJR3.18
Scimago H <br class='widget-line-break'>index value: 71
Scimago H
index
71
h5-index value: 51
h5-index51
Volume 11, issue 3
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 1181–1198, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1181-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 1181–1198, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1181-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Methods for assessment of models 29 Mar 2018

Methods for assessment of models | 29 Mar 2018

Error assessment of biogeochemical models by lower bound methods (NOMMA-1.0)

Volkmar Sauerland et al.

Model code and software

NOMMA-1.0.1 V. Sauerland https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1162769

Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
We present a concept to prove that a parametric model is well calibrated, i.e., that changes of its free parameters cannot lead to a much better model–data misfit anymore. The intention is motivated by the fact that calibrating global biogeochemical ocean models is important for assessment and inter-model comparison but computationally expensive.
We present a concept to prove that a parametric model is well calibrated, i.e., that changes of...
Citation