Articles | Volume 9, issue 11
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-4273-2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-4273-2016
Model description paper
 | 
25 Nov 2016
Model description paper |  | 25 Nov 2016

Parameterizing microphysical effects on variances and covariances of moisture and heat content using a multivariate probability density function: a study with CLUBB (tag MVCS)

Brian M. Griffin and Vincent E. Larson

Related authors

A new subgrid-scale representation of hydrometeor fields using a multivariate PDF
Brian M. Griffin and Vincent E. Larson
Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 2031–2053, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-2031-2016,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-2031-2016, 2016
Short summary

Related subject area

Atmospheric sciences
Explaining neural networks for detection of tropical cyclones and atmospheric rivers in gridded atmospheric simulation data
Tim Radke, Susanne Fuchs, Christian Wilms, Iuliia Polkova, and Marc Rautenhaus
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1017–1039, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1017-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1017-2025, 2025
Short summary
Accurate space-based NOx emission estimates with the flux divergence approach require fine-scale model information on local oxidation chemistry and profile shapes
Felipe Cifuentes, Henk Eskes, Enrico Dammers, Charlotte Bryan, and Folkert Boersma
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 621–649, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-621-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-621-2025, 2025
Short summary
Exploring a high-level programming model for the NWP domain using ECMWF microphysics schemes
Stefano Ubbiali, Christian Kühnlein, Christoph Schär, Linda Schlemmer, Thomas C. Schulthess, Michael Staneker, and Heini Wernli
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 529–546, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-529-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-529-2025, 2025
Short summary
Quantifying uncertainties in satellite NO2 superobservations for data assimilation and model evaluation
Pieter Rijsdijk, Henk Eskes, Arlene Dingemans, K. Folkert Boersma, Takashi Sekiya, Kazuyuki Miyazaki, and Sander Houweling
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 483–509, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-483-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-483-2025, 2025
Short summary
ML-AMPSIT: Machine Learning-based Automated Multi-method Parameter Sensitivity and Importance analysis Tool
Dario Di Santo, Cenlin He, Fei Chen, and Lorenzo Giovannini
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 433–459, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-433-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-433-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

André, J. C., de Moor, G., Lacarrère, P., and du Vachat, R.: Modeling the 24-hour evolution of the mean and turbulent structures of the planetary boundary layer, J. Atmos. Sci., 35, 1861–1883, 1978.
Bechtold, P., Semane, N., Lopez, P., Chaboureau, J.-P., Beljaars, A., and Bormann, N.: Representing Equilibrium and Nonequilibrium Convection in Large-Scale Models, J. Atmos. Sci., 71, 734–753, 2014.
Böing, S. J., Jonker, H. J., Siebesma, A. P., and Grabowski, W. W.: Influence of the subcloud layer on the development of a deep convective ensemble, J. Atmos. Sci., 69, 2682–2698, 2012.
Boutle, I., Abel, S., Hill, P., and Morcrette, C.: Spatial variability of liquid cloud and rain: Observations and microphysical effects, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 140, 583–594, 2014.
Download
Short summary
Microphysical process rates, such as the formation, growth, and evaporation of precipitation, affect the variances, covariances, and fluxes of moisture and heat content. These effects appear as covariance terms within the Reynolds-averaged predictive equations for the scalar (co)variances and fluxes. Using a multivariate probability density function (PDF) and a simple warm-rain microphysics scheme, these microphysical covariance terms can be obtained by analytic integration over the PDF.
Share