Articles | Volume 19, issue 13
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-6167-2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-6167-2026
Development and technical paper
 | 
10 Jul 2026
Development and technical paper |  | 10 Jul 2026

ICON coupled to HAM-lite 1.0 in limited-area mode: an efficient framework for targeted kilometer-scale simulations with interactive aerosols

Bernd Heinold, Philipp Weiss, Sadhitro De, Anne Kubin, Jason Müller, Fabian Senf, Philip Stier, and Ina Tegen

Related authors

Sensitivity of convective cloud and rainfall responses to urban aerosol emission strengths
Friederike Keil, Markus Quante, Bernd Heinold, and Volker Matthias
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2934,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2934, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
Assessment of transparent exopolymer particles in the Arctic Ocean implemented into the coupled ocean–sea ice–biogeochemistry model FESOM2.1–REcoM3
Moritz Zeising, Laurent Oziel, Silke Thoms, Özgür Gürses, Judith Hauck, Bernd Heinold, Svetlana N. Losa, Manuela van Pinxteren, Christoph Völker, Sebastian Zeppenfeld, and Astrid Bracher
Geosci. Model Dev., 19, 2077–2109, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-2077-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-2077-2026, 2026
Short summary
Thirty years of arctic primary marine organic aerosols: patterns, seasonal dynamics, and trends (1990–2019)
Anisbel Leon-Marcos, Manuela van Pinxteren, Sebastian Zeppenfeld, Moritz Zeising, Astrid Bracher, Laurent Oziel, Ina Tegen, and Bernd Heinold
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 1109–1144, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-1109-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-1109-2026, 2026
Short summary
Refining simulated mineral dust composition through modified size distributions: dual validation with mineral-specific and elemental observations
Sofía Gómez Maqueo Anaya, Sudharaj Aryasree, Konrad Kandler, Eduardo José dos Santos Souza, Khanneh Wadinga Fomba, Dietrich Althausen, Maria Kezoudi, Matthias Faust, Bernd Heinold, Ina Tegen, Moritz Haarig, Holger Baars, and Kerstin Schepanski
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-23,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-23, 2026
Short summary
Tracking the Impact of Urban Air Masses on Convective Precipitation: A Multi-Member Modeling Study
Friederike Keil, Markus Quante, Bernd Heinold, and Volker Matthias
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4374,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4374, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Abdul-Razzak, H. and Ghan, S. J.: A parameterization of aerosol activation: 2. Multiple aerosol types, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 105, 6837–6844, https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD901161, 2000. a
Ansmann, A., Seifert, P., Tesche, M., and Wandinger, U.: Profiling of fine and coarse particle mass: case studies of Saharan dust and Eyjafjallajökull/Grimsvötn volcanic plumes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 9399–9415, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-9399-2012, 2012. a
Baldauf, M., Seifert, A., Förstner, J., Majewski, D., Raschendorfer, M., and Reinhardt, T.: Operational Convective-Scale Numerical Weather Prediction with the COSMO Model: Description and Sensitivities, Mon. Weather Rev., 139, 3887–3905, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-10-05013.1, 2011. a, b
Bellouin, N., Quaas, J., Gryspeerdt, E., Kinne, S., Stier, P., Watson-Parris, D., Boucher, O., Carslaw, K. S., Christensen, M., Daniau, A.-L., Dufresne, J.-L., Feingold, G., Fiedler, S., Forster, P., Gettelman, A., Haywood, J. M., Lohmann, U., Malavelle, F., Mauritsen, T., McCoy, D. T., Myhre, G., Mülmenstädt, J., Neubauer, D., Possner, A., Rugenstein, M., Sato, Y., Schulz, M., Schwartz, S. E., Sourdeval, O., Storelvmo, T., Toll, V., Winker, D., and Stevens, B.: Bounding global aerosol radiative forcing of climate change, Rev. Geophys., 58, e2019RG000660, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019RG000660, 2020. a
Boer, M. M., Resco de Dios, V., and Bradstock, R. A.: Unprecedented burn area of Australian mega forest fires, Nat. Clim. Change, 10, 171–172, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0716-1, 2020. a
Download
Short summary
Understanding climate effects of airborne particles requires computer models that can represent small-scale dynamics. We introduce a new regional configuration of a kilometre-scale aerosol–climate model and apply it to air pollution in Central Europe, sea spray in the Atlantic Arctic, and smoke and dust over Australia. The simulations reproduce key particle patterns and variability, but also reveal limitations due to simplified sources and chemistry. The results guide future model improvements.
Share