Articles | Volume 16, issue 23
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-7143-2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-7143-2023
Model evaluation paper
 | 
08 Dec 2023
Model evaluation paper |  | 08 Dec 2023

An evaluation of the LLC4320 global-ocean simulation based on the submesoscale structure of modeled sea surface temperature fields

Katharina Gallmeier, J. Xavier Prochaska, Peter Cornillon, Dimitris Menemenlis, and Madolyn Kelm

Related authors

RADIv2, an Adaptable and Versatile Diagenetic Model for Coastal and Open-Ocean Sediments
Hinne Florian van der Zant, Olivier Sulpis, Jack J. Middelburg, Matthew P. Humphreys, Raphaël Savelli, Dustin Carroll, Dimitris Menemenlis, Kay Sušelj, and Vincent Le Fouest
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2244,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2244, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Implementing Riverine Biogeochemical Inputs in ECCO-Darwin: a Critical Step Forward for a Pioneering Data-Assimilative Global-Ocean Biogeochemistry Model
Raphaël Savelli, Dustin Carroll, Dimitris Menemenlis, Jonathan Lauderdale, Clément Bertin, Stephanie Dutkiewicz, Manfredi Manizza, Anthony Bloom, Karel Castro-Morales, Charles E. Miller, Marc Simard, Kevin W. Bowman, and Hong Zhang
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1707,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1707, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
On the Challenges of Retrieving Phytoplankton Properties from Remote-Sensing Observations
J. Xavier Prochaska and Robert J. Frouin
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-927,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-927, 2025
Short summary
Terrestrial browning from Colored Dissolved Organic Matter (CDOM) changes the seasonal phenology of the coastal Arctic carbon cycle
Clement Bertin, Vincent Le Fouest, Dustin Carroll, Stephanie Dutkiewicz, Dimitris Menemenlis, Atsushi Matsuoka, Manfredi Manizza, and Charles E. Miller
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-973,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-973, 2025
Short summary
Northern Hemisphere Stratospheric Temperature Response to External Forcing in Decadal Climate Simulations
Abdullah A. Fahad, Andrea Molod, Krzysztof Wargan, Dimitris Menemenlis, Patrick Heimbach, Atanas Trayanov, Ehud Strobach, and Lawrence Coy
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1892797/v2,https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1892797/v2, 2025
Short summary

Related subject area

Climate and Earth system modeling
Correction of sea surface biases in the NEMO ocean general circulation model using neural networks
Andrea Storto, Sergey Frolov, Laura Slivinski, and Chunxue Yang
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4789–4804, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4789-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4789-2025, 2025
Short summary
Representing lateral groundwater flow from land to river in Earth system models
Chang Liao, L. Ruby Leung, Yilin Fang, Teklu Tesfa, and Robinson Negron-Juarez
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4601–4624, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4601-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4601-2025, 2025
Short summary
FINAM is not a model (v1.0): a new Python-based model coupling framework
Sebastian Müller, Martin Lange, Thomas Fischer, Sara König, Matthias Kelbling, Jeisson Javier Leal Rojas, and Stephan Thober
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4483–4498, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4483-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4483-2025, 2025
Short summary
The Detection and Attribution Model Intercomparison Project (DAMIP v2.0) contribution to CMIP7
Nathan P. Gillett, Isla R. Simpson, Gabi Hegerl, Reto Knutti, Dann Mitchell, Aurélien Ribes, Hideo Shiogama, Dáithí Stone, Claudia Tebaldi, Piotr Wolski, Wenxia Zhang, and Vivek K. Arora
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4399–4416, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4399-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4399-2025, 2025
Short summary
Enhancing winter climate simulations of the Great Lakes: insights from a new coupled lake–ice–atmosphere (CLIAv1) system on the importance of integrating 3D hydrodynamics with a regional climate model
Pengfei Xue, Chenfu Huang, Yafang Zhong, Michael Notaro, Miraj B. Kayastha, Xing Zhou, Chuyan Zhao, Christa Peters-Lidard, Carlos Cruz, and Eric Kemp
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4293–4316, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4293-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4293-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Arbic, B. K., Alford, M. H., Ansong, J. K., Buijsman, M. C., Ciotti, R. B., Farrar, J. T., Hallberg, R. W., Henze, C. E., Hill, C. N., Luecke, C. A., Menemenlis, D., Metzger, E. J., Müeller, M., Nelson, A. D., Nelson, B. C., Ngodock, H. E., Ponte, R. M., Richman, J. G., Savage, A. C., Scott, R. B., Shriver, J. F., Simmons, H. L., Souopgui, I., Timko, P. G., Wallcraft, A. J., Zamudio, L., and Zhao, Z.: A Primer on Global Internal Tide and Internal Gravity Wave Continuum Modeling in HYCOM and MITgcm, in: New Frontiers in Operational Oceanography, edited by: Chassignet, E. P., Pascual, A., Tintoré, J., and Verron, J., Chap. 13, GODAE OceanView, 307–392, https://doi.org/10.17125/gov2018.ch13, 2018. a, b
Arbic, B. K., Elipot, S., Brasch, J. M., Menemenlis, D., Ponte, A. L., Shriver, J. F., Yu, X., Zaron, E. D., Alford, M. H., Buijsman, M. C., Abernathey, R., Garcia, D., Guan, L., Martin, P. E., and Nelson, A. D.: Near‐Surface Oceanic Kinetic Energy Distributions From Drifter Observations and Numerical Models, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 127, 1–30, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JC018551, 2022. a
Bryan, K.: Michael Cox (1941–1989): His Pioneering Contributions to Ocean Circulation, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 21, 1259–1270, 1991. a
Böhm, V. and Seljak, U.: Probabilistic Auto-Encoder, ArXiv [preprint], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2006.05479, 2020. a
Cheng, S. and Ménard, B.: How to quantify fields or textures? A guide to the scattering transform, arXiv [preprint], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2112.01288, 2021. a
Download
Short summary
This paper introduces an approach to evaluate numerical models of ocean circulation. We compare the structure of satellite-derived sea surface temperature anomaly (SSTa) instances determined by a machine learning algorithm at 10–80 km scales to those output by a high-resolution MITgcm run. The simulation over much of the ocean reproduces the observed distribution of SSTa patterns well. This general agreement, alongside a few notable exceptions, highlights the potential of this approach.
Share