<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?><?xmltex \bartext{Model evaluation paper}?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">GMD</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Geoscientific Model Development</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">GMD</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Geosci. Model Dev.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1991-9603</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/gmd-16-7143-2023</article-id><title-group><article-title>An evaluation of the LLC4320 global-ocean simulation based on the submesoscale structure of modeled sea surface temperature fields</article-title><alt-title>An evaluation of the LLC4320 global-ocean simulation</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{An evaluation of the LLC4320 global-ocean simulation}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{K. Gallmeier et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Gallmeier</surname><given-names>Katharina</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5237-3077</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes" corresp="yes" rid="aff2 aff3 aff4 aff5">
          <name><surname>Prochaska</surname><given-names>J. Xavier</given-names></name>
          <email>jxp@ucsc.edu</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes" corresp="no" rid="aff6 aff9">
          <name><surname>Cornillon</surname><given-names>Peter</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7296-3282</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff7">
          <name><surname>Menemenlis</surname><given-names>Dimitris</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9940-8409</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff8">
          <name><surname>Kelm</surname><given-names>Madolyn</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0009-0002-7227-6156</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Institute for Defense Analyses, Alexandria, VA 22305, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Department of Ocean Sciences, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe (Kavli IPMU), <?xmltex \hack{\break}?> 5-1-5 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, 277-8583, Japan</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Simons Pivot Fellow, New York, NY, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>Graduate School of Oceanography, University of Rhode Island, Narragansett, RI 02882, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff7"><label>7</label><institution>Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff8"><label>8</label><institution>Department of Earth System Science, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff9"><label>☆</label><institution>retired</institution>
        </aff><author-comment content-type="econtrib"><p>These authors contributed equally to this work.</p></author-comment>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">J. Xavier Prochaska (jxp@ucsc.edu)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>8</day><month>December</month><year>2023</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>16</volume>
      <issue>23</issue>
      <fpage>7143</fpage><lpage>7170</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>2</day><month>March</month><year>2023</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>15</day><month>March</month><year>2023</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>1</day><month>September</month><year>2023</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>5</day><month>September</month><year>2023</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2023 </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d1e177">We have assembled 2 851 702 nearly cloud-free cutout images (sized 144 km <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 144 km) of sea surface temperature (SST) data from the entire 2012–2020 Level-2 Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) dataset to perform a quantitative comparison to the ocean model output from the MIT General Circulation Model (MITgcm). Specifically, we evaluate outputs from the LLC4320  (LLC, latitude–longitude–polar cap) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">48</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> global-ocean simulation for a 1-year period starting on 17 November 2011 but otherwise matched in geography and the day of the year to the VIIRS observations. In lieu of simple (e.g., mean, standard deviation) or complex (e.g., power spectrum) statistics, we analyze the cutouts of SST anomalies with an unsupervised probabilistic autoencoder (PAE) trained to learn the distribution of structures in SST anomaly (SSTa) on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">80</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> km scales (i.e., submesoscale to mesoscale). A principal finding is that the LLC4320 simulation reproduces, over a large fraction of the ocean, the observed distribution of SSTa patterns well, both globally and regionally. Globally, the medians of the structure distributions match to within <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">65</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> % of the ocean, despite a modest, latitude-dependent offset. Regionally, the model outputs reproduce mesoscale variations in SSTa patterns revealed by the PAE in the VIIRS data, including subtle features imprinted by variations in bathymetry. We also identify significant differences in the distribution of SSTa patterns in several regions: (1) in an equatorial band equatorward of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; (2) in the Antarctic Circumpolar Current (ACC), especially in the eastern half of the Indian Ocean; and (3) in the vicinity of the point at which western boundary currents separate from the continental margin. It is clear that region 3 is a result of premature separation in the simulated western boundary currents. The model output in region 2, the southern Indian Ocean, tends to predict more structure than observed, perhaps arising from a misrepresentation of the mixed layer or of energy dissipation and stirring in the simulation. The differences in region 1, the equatorial band, are also likely due to model errors, perhaps arising from the shortness of the simulation or from the lack of high-frequency and/or wavenumber atmospheric forcing. Although we do not yet know the exact causes for these model–data SSTa differences, we expect that this type of comparison will help guide future developments of high-resolution global-ocean simulations.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>Office of Naval Research</funding-source>
<award-id>N00014-17-1-2963</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs2">
<funding-source>National Aeronautics and Space Administration</funding-source>
<award-id>80NSSC18K0837</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs3">
<funding-source>National Aeronautics and Space Administration</funding-source>
<award-id>80NSSC20K1728</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs4">
<funding-source>National Science Foundation</funding-source>
<award-id>OCE-1950586</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs5">
<funding-source>National Science Foundation</funding-source>
<award-id>CNS-1456638</award-id>
<award-id>CNS-1730158</award-id>
<award-id>CNS-2100237</award-id>
<award-id>CNS-2120019</award-id>
<award-id>ACI-1540112</award-id>
<award-id>ACI-1541349</award-id>
<award-id>OAC-1826967</award-id>
<award-id>OAC-2112167</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<?pagebreak page7144?><sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e256">Ocean general circulation models (OGCMs) are an attempt to reproduce the physics and thermodynamics associated with large-scale oceanic processes. The first global implementation of an OGCM with “realistic” coastlines and bathymetry was undertaken in the early 1970s on a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> grid with 12 vertical levels <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="paren.1"/>. A subjective evaluation of this model's performance compared the dynamic topography “patterns” of large-scale (basin-wide) gyres determined from ship surveys with those obtained from the model. A more quantitative evaluation was also performed by comparing the transport through the Drake Passage determined from hydrographic sections with those obtained from the model – an excellent overview of the early work on OGCMs is provided in Kirk Bryan's tribute to Michael Cox's work <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="paren.2"/>. These spatially coarse comparisons made clear that the model reproduced some general features of the large-scale circulation but missed others; often those it had missed were off by significant fractions when quantitative comparisons were made. Given the coarse resolution – grid spacing often twice that of the width of major ocean currents such as the Gulf Stream – and the representation for subgrid-scale processes, which attempt to incorporate the physical contribution of processes on scales smaller than the grid spacing, it is not surprising that this model missed some features of large-scale circulation.</p>
      <p id="d1e285">In the 50 years since Cox's work, the processing capacity of computers has increased dramatically from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 megaflop, for the UNIVAC 1108 used by Cox, to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> megaflops. Likewise, storage capacities have seen similar increases, more efficient codes have been introduced, and the observational data needed to constrain and force the models have seen staggering increases in volume as well as accuracy. Today, OGCMs are run on grids ranging from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">48</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with 100 or more vertical levels (see, e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1 bib1.bibx32" id="altparen.3"/>). As a result, these models resolve many mesoscale processes that earlier models had missed. They reproduce most of the large-scale patterns in the global ocean and  the currents associated with these patterns quite well, offering confidence in studies that use them to predict the evolution of the ocean and atmosphere on a warming planet.</p>
      <p id="d1e342">The evaluation methodology described in this paper is meant to be applied to unconstrained OGCMs of sufficient resolution to develop vigorous mesoscale and, to some extent, submesoscale variability. At the moment, we lack the observations and estimation tools that are needed to constrain the amplitude and phase of individual mesoscale (and submesoscale) eddies globally and in a dynamically consistent manner. Due to the chaotic nature of the ocean, it is not expected that the simulated mesoscale and submesoscale features of free-running models will precisely match the observations, even if better observational tools were available than those existing today <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="paren.4"/>. While comparing the predicted and modeled fields at an instant in time works for constrained models, the evaluation of free-running models must be performed statistically, since the mesoscale and submesoscale details inevitably differ within the observed field and the one modeled for the same timestamp. Furthermore, to the best of our knowledge, evaluations of the highest-resolution global, free-running OGCMs have, to date, focused on scales substantially larger (1.5–2 orders of magnitude larger) than the horizontal grid spacing of the model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="paren.5"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. As such, these evaluations do not assess the capability of such models to reproduce statistically valid measures of the submesoscale structure of their output. We introduce this approach to model evaluation in the context of one of the highest-resolution, global, free-running OGCMs available, specifically, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">48</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 90-level simulation known as LLC4320 (LLC, latitude–longitude–polar cap). This simulation was developed as part of the Estimating the Circulation and Climate of the Ocean (ECCO) project in a collaborative effort between the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), and the NASA Ames Research Center (ARC). Because the primary objective of this paper is to introduce a new approach to model evaluation, we present only a few examples of regions of agreement and regions in which the model may be failing.</p>
      <p id="d1e369">Performing the desired evaluation requires a dataset with global coverage spanning at least the LLC4320 time period and spatial sampling comparable to LLC4320 horizontal grid spacing, which ranges from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 km at the Equator to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 km at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">70</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> latitude. Sea surface temperature (SST) fields obtained from several different satellite-borne sensors meet these requirements. The selected SST dataset and the LLC4320 simulation are described in more detail in the next section. As discussed in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3"/>, we use an unsupervised machine learning algorithm applied to approximately 150 km <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 150 km regions, which we refer to as <italic>cutouts</italic>, to capture a measure of the submesoscale structure of the SST fields. By adopting this algorithm, we are intentionally agnostic to specific structures or patterns.  The algorithm “learns” the structures that are dominant in the data and, equally as important, their distribution. Furthermore, it can be applied in the same fashion to observational data and model output. This measure of field structure for the satellite-derived SST fields is then compared statistically with that obtained from similar-sized squares of the model output. The results of these comparisons are discussed in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Data</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Satellite-derived SST data</title>
      <p id="d1e428">The Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) instrument carried on the National Polar-orbiting Partnership (NPP) satellite provided the highest-spatial-resolution global SST products, which are 750 m at nadir (degrading to 1700 m at the swath edge), with at least daily coverage for the period covered by the LLC4320 simulation. VIIRS is a multi-detector instrument for which variations in the gain from the detector-to-detector metric introduces striping in the resulting fields. In addition, geometric distortions in pixel location arise as the distance from nadir increases, referred to as the bow-tie effect, and render regions more than approximately 500 km from nadir useless for our analysis unless they are corrected. These two issues, striping and inconstant pixel size, significantly impact the structure of the retrieved SST fields. For this reason, we elected to use the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Level-2P (L2P) second full-mission reanalysis (RAN2) of the VIIRS data <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="paren.6"/>, the only product we are aware of that addresses both of these issues.<fn id="Ch1.Footn1"><p id="d1e434">The Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) is not a multi-detector instrument, so it does not suffer from the striping and geometric distortion issues associated with data from VIIRS, but the coarser spatial resolution, 1.1 km at nadir, introduces greater degradation in resolution with distance from nadir and the noisier instrument results in a product with at least twice the noise of VIIRS <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="paren.7"/>. The Sea and Land Surface Temperature Radiometer (SLSTR) instrument carried on the European Sentinel satellites provides an interesting alternative dataset, but, given our lack of detailed familiarity with these data, we elected to continue using VIIRS.</p></fn></p>
      <p id="d1e440">We downloaded all of the L2P RAN2 files for the years 2012–2020 (inclusive) from the JPL Physical Oceanography Distributed Active Archive Center (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="altparen.8"/>, PO.DAAC; <uri>https://podaac.jpl.nasa.gov</uri>, last access: 1 November 2023). Each file contains the retrievals from 10 min of satellite data, approximately 5400 scans with 3200 pixels per scan. There are approximately 500 000 files for the period studied.  These <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 500 000 files total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 90 TB and form the basis of our observational analysis.</p>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page7145?><sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>SST output from the LLC4320 simulation</title>
      <p id="d1e471">The LLC4320 simulation was completed in 2015 by Dimitris Menemenlis, a coauthor of the present study, with help from collaborators at MIT and NASA ARC (see, e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27 bib1.bibx28 bib1.bibx1" id="altparen.9"/>). The LLC4320 simulation is a global-ocean and sea-ice simulation that represents full-depth ocean processes. The simulation is based on a latitude–longitude–polar cap (LLC) configuration of the MIT General Circulation Model (MITgcm; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20 bib1.bibx13" id="altparen.10"/>). The LLC4320 grid has 13 square tiles with 4320 grid points on each side and 90 vertical levels for a total grid-cell count of 2.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="paren.11"/>. Nominal horizontal grid spacing is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">48</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, ranging from 0.75 km near Antarctica to 2.2 km at the Equator, and vertical levels have <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 m thickness near the surface in order to better resolve the diurnal cycle. The simulation is initialized from an ECCO, data-constrained, global-ocean and sea-ice solution with nominal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> horizontal grid spacing <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="paren.12"/>. From there, model resolution is gradually increased to LLC1080 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> grid), LLC2160 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> grid), and finally LLC4320 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">48</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> grid). Configuration details are similar to those of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ECCO solution except that the LLC4320 simulation includes atmospheric pressure and tidal forcing. The inclusion of tides allows for successful shelf-slope dynamics and water mass modification and their contribution to the global-ocean circulation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="paren.13"/>. Surface boundary conditions are from the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.14</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) atmospheric operational model analysis, starting in 2011. Another unique feature of this simulation is that hourly output of full 3-dimensional model prognostic variables were saved, making it a remarkable tool for the study of ocean and air–sea exchange processes and for the simulation of satellite observations. The 00:00 and 12:00 GMT global SST fields for the uppermost 1 m level of the LLC4320 output were downloaded using the <monospace>xmitgcm</monospace> package for the 365 d period starting on 17 November 2011, yielding 730 files totaling <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 TB. Hereinbelow, we will use LLC and LLC4320 interchangeably to refer to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">48</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> MITgcm simulation. Although the entire model domain was downloaded, only the region from the southern extreme to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">57</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> N was considered in the geographic analysis to avoid the change in grid geometry occurring at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">57</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> N.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Creation of comparable SST anomaly (SSTa) cutouts</title>
      <p id="d1e689">Following our previous study on SST patterns <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="paren.14"/>, we chose to analyze cutouts, approximately <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 150 km <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 150 km regions extracted from the parent observational and modeled SST fields. The size of these samples was chosen in part to focus on features at scales of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 km or smaller (i.e., submesoscale). Using these modest-sized cutouts also yields a massive number of cutouts – O(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) – with array dimensions that are easily tractable to machine learning techniques (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 pixels <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 pixels). In the following subsections, we detail the procedures to generate such cutouts from the VIIRS data and LLC4320 outputs that have a nearly equal dimension and geographical coverage.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS1">
  <label>3.1.1</label><title>VIIRS cutouts </title>
      <p id="d1e754">In each VIIRS parent field (<italic>image</italic> hereinafter), we identified every 192 pixel <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 192 pixel subarray that has fewer than 2 % of its pixels masked (quality_level <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) because of land, corrupted pixels usually associated with cloud cover, or missing data. This <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> % threshold was established after sampling at a wider range of thresholds (as high as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> %) and assessing the outputs. For thresholds greater than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> %, we found that clouds significantly bias estimates of the degree of<?pagebreak page7146?> structure obtained by the machine learning algorithm (discussed in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS1"/>) applied to the datasets of cutouts.</p>
      <p id="d1e801">We then divided each image into a grid with a cell size of 96 pixels <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 96 pixels and selected the closest cutout to the center of each grid cell that satisfies the 2 % threshold (or 0 if none satisfy). This approach randomized the sampling, thus avoiding possible biases that may have emerged from cutouts sampled on a regular grid. In a well-sampled image, this implies each cutout has a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 % overlap with its four nearest neighbors and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 25 % with the next four nearest neighbors. Unlike our analysis of Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) data, we did not place a restriction on the distance from nadir because the physical size of the VIIRS pixels varies by approximately a factor of 2 from nadir to the swath edge <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="paren.15"/> compared with a variation of approximately a factor of 5 for MODIS.</p>
      <p id="d1e828">From the full parent dataset, we extracted 2 851 702 cutouts (limiting to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">57</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N; see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS2"/>). The geographical distribution of these is shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>, which highlights the regions of the ocean that are preferentially cloud free (e.g., the equatorial Pacific Ocean and coastal regions). For this and all subsequent geographic plots, we used Hierarchical Equal Area isoLatitude Pixelation (HEALPix, <uri>https://healpix.sourceforge.io</uri>, last access: 1 November 2023) schema <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="paren.16"/>, which tessellates the surface into equal-area curvilinear quadrilaterals and was introduced for all-sky analysis of astronomical data. Throughout the paper, we opted for nside, the HEALPix resolution parameter, to be 64, which yields a HEALPix cell with an area of approximately 100 km <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 km. Values presented are numbers associated with each HEALPix cell, in this case the number of cutouts in the cell.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e870">Geographic distribution of cutouts in our 98 % clear VIIRS dataset, shown using a log<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-based scale of color intensity. Each equally sized (HEALPix) spatial cell, plotted as dots here, covers approximately 10 000 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. HEALPix cells with fewer than five VIIRS cutouts or fewer than five LLC4320 cutouts are shown in white. Land is shown as light gray. Meridional white line at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 35<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W is due to an LLC4320 sampling artifact. </p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/16/7143/2023/gmd-16-7143-2023-f01.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e913">For cutouts with one or more masked pixels, we “inpainted” them using the biharmonic algorithm provided in the <monospace>scikit-image</monospace> software package <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="paren.17"/>; the algorithm, we found, performs well even for data with steep gradients <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="paren.18"/>. We then downscaled the arrays with a local mean to 64 pixels <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 64 pixels or approximately 144 km <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 144 km at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.1 km sampling, which approximately matches the coarsest sampling of the LLC4320 outputs. Note that the actual size of cutouts is a function of distance from nadir; we did not resample the observed data to account for these changes. Last, we demeaned each cutout to produce  SST anomaly (SSTa) fields. This defines the final, preprocessed dataset that we use for all VIIRS analyses to follow.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS2">
  <label>3.1.2</label><title>LLC4320 cutouts </title>
      <p id="d1e955">Roughly 9 years (8 years, 11 months) of VIIRS data comprise the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 million (2 932 452) VIIRS cutouts, whereas the LLC4320 simulation output used for this study spans only 1 year. To further restrict the VIIRS cutouts to 1 year would leave too few data for a full-globe comparison between satellite observations and the model outputs. For this reason, we compare <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9 years of VIIRS data to the 1-year model simulation.</p>
      <p id="d1e972">Our approach to constructing cutouts from the LLC4320 outputs intentionally paralleled the methodology and outputs for VIIRS. We first identified all 64 pixel <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 64 pixel regions that have a valid SST value (i.e., avoiding land). The geographic location (lat, long) of each of these was recorded. Second, we considered the full year of LLC4320 outputs taken every 12 h from 17 November 2011 to 15 November 2012 (inclusive). For each cutout in the VIIRS sample, we matched the location to the closest valid 64 pixel <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 64 pixel region in the LLC4320 dataset.  We then identified the LLC4320 timestamp closest in time from the start of the given year (with the LLC4320 in 12 h intervals). This is akin to matching on the day of the year and then the time of the day to the nearest 12 h. This “climatological” matchup of cutouts was performed to avoid seasonal and regional biases in the sampling.</p>
      <p id="d1e989">Much of the analysis presented in subsequent sections of this paper compares the statistics of cutouts in a given HEALPix cell. Ideally, the cutouts associated with a VIIRS–LLC4320 matchup lie in the same HEALPix cell. This, however, is not always the case; the closest LLC4320 cutout to a VIIRS cutout may lie in an adjacent HEALPix cell when the VIIRS cutout lies outside of the LLC4320 grid, generally in coastal waters.</p>
      <p id="d1e992">We wished to maintain an approximately constant sampling size of 2.25 km matched to VIIRS or a 144 km <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 144 km total for a 64 pixel <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 64 pixel cutout. Therefore, we sized the array extracted from the LLC4320 outputs according to the local size of the grid, which varies as approximately <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">lat</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for latitudes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">57</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> N. At latitudes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">57</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> N, LLC4320 horizontal grid spacing asymptotes to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 km in the polar cap. To avoid the complications brought by different grid characteristics, we constrained our analysis to an area south of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">57</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> N.</p>
      <p id="d1e1072">Each extracted LLC4320 array is downscaled to a 64 pixel <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 64 pixel cutout using the local mean. We then injected random noise using a Gaussian deviate with a standard deviation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.04</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K based on an analysis of the noise properties of the VIIRS data <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="paren.19"/>. Lastly, we demeaned each cutout to generate SSTa arrays.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Characterization of the SSTa cutouts</title>
      <p id="d1e1106">Each cutout was assigned a log-likelihood (LL) metric by the machine learning algorithm, ULMO, used for this work. This metric describes the frequency of occurrence of the cutout within the full set. The LL metric tends to correlate with the SST structure, at least at the spatial scales of the fields under consideration here, with structure increasing with a decreasing LL <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="paren.20"/>. This simply follows from the fact that the parent sample is dominated by cutouts with little inherent structure. Comparing the distribution of LL values across the global ocean thus identifies geographic regions<?pagebreak page7147?> where the structure of the model output at submesoscale-to-mesoscale levels matches (or fails to match) the observations.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>3.2.1</label><title>Brief overview of ULMO</title>
      <p id="d1e1119">The ULMO machine learning algorithm is a probabilistic autoencoder <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="paren.21"><named-content content-type="pre">PAE;</named-content></xref> designed to assign a relative probability of occurrence to each cutout in a large dataset.  It is an unsupervised method which learns representations of the diversity of SSTa patterns without human assessment. The PAE combines two deep learning algorithms to perform its analysis. The first is an autoencoder that generates a reduced dimensionality representation (a.k.a., a latent vector) for each cutout in a complex latent space. The second step is a normalizing flow <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="paren.22"/> which transforms the autoencoder latent space into a Gaussian manifold with the same dimensionality. One can then calculate the relative probability of any cutout occurring within the Gaussian manifold with standard statistics. We refer to this relative probability as the log-likelihood (LL) metric.</p>
      <p id="d1e1130">In the following section, we compare distributions of the LL metric for the VIIRS and LLC4320 cutouts in discrete geographical regions across the global ocean. This provides a quantitative technique to compare the SSTa patterns predicted by the OGCM against those observed in the real ocean.  We note that because the LL metric is only a scalar description of a given pattern's frequency of occurrence, it is possible – in principle – to have similar LL distributions despite qualitative differences in the SSTa patterns.  This would, however, require a remarkable coincidence, and our visual inspection of regions with consistent LL distributions have not revealed any such examples. We also emphasize that the opposite is not true:  regions with significantly different LL distributions do have qualitatively differing distributions of SSTa patterns.</p>
      <p id="d1e1133">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/> presents galleries of VIIRS and LLC cutouts designed to show how the structure of the cutouts vary as a function of LL. For Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>a, the entire LL VIIRS population is divided into quintiles. For each quintile, one VIIRS cutout and one LLC cutout is randomly selected from the 50 LL values nearest to the median of the VIIRS LL distribution. The LL of the median values are shown above the VIIRS cutouts. These galleries show a well-defined progression from fields with a large temperature range and accompanying gradients to fields with a smaller temperature range, weaker gradients, and less complex patterns.</p>
      <?pagebreak page7148?><p id="d1e1140">The correlation between temperature range and LL seen in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>a was noted by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="text.23"/> in their discussion of the MODIS dataset. In the analysis to follow (Sect. 4.2), we compare LL values of VIIRS cutouts with those for LLC cutouts at the same geographic location, which suggests that the temperature range of the cutouts we compare will be similar. (Admittedly, there are a few regions where this is not the case, and we address this when it occurs.) Important from the perspective of the work presented herein is rather how the characteristics of cutouts vary with LL when the temperature range is bound to a small range. To further provide a sense for how cutout characteristics other than temperature range evolve with LL, we present a second gallery of VIIRS and LLC cutouts in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>b. These cutouts are restricted to have <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is defined as the difference in 90th and 10th percentiles of the SST distribution: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>≡</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">90</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>th percentile. These galleries were constructed in the same fashion as those for Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>a. In this case, the progression is from cutouts for which SST contours are relatively convoluted to cutouts with relatively straighter contours; in other words, the “structure” of the cutouts decreases as LL increases. As with the galleries in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>a, the characteristics of the LLC cutouts in this gallery track those of the cutouts in the VIIRS gallery.</p>
      <p id="d1e1226">As noted above, the galleries of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/> show how the structure of the cutouts varies with LL. However, they do not relate the LL to the underlying dynamics, which would be helpful in obtaining a better understanding of regions in which the LLC appears to fail. We are working on trying to establish such a relationship, if one exists, but to date, it eludes us. The lack of such a relationship, however, does not invalidate the results of this work in that whatever the relationship, it applies equally to VIIRS and LLC4320.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e1233"> Galleries of cutouts showing the progression of the structure of the associated SST fields as a function of LL. <bold>(a)</bold> Galleries for the entire set of cutouts. Upper row is for VIIRS cutouts; lower row is for LLC cutouts. Each cutout is randomly selected from the 50 cutouts with the LL nearest to the median VIIRS LL value for the associated LL quintile. The LL of the median is shown above the VIIRS cutout. <bold>(b)</bold> Similar galleries for all cutouts with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>≡</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">90</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denoting the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>th percentile. </p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/16/7143/2023/gmd-16-7143-2023-f02.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS2">
  <label>3.2.2</label><title>Training on VIIRS and evaluation</title>
      <p id="d1e1317">In <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="text.24"/> we introduced the ULMO algorithm and trained a model with Level-2 (L2) MODIS data sampled at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 km and using 64 pixel <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 64 pixel cutouts. While this model could have been applied here to the VIIRS and LLC4320 cutouts, we have generated a new ULMO model from the VIIRS dataset. The same hyperparameters derived for ULMO in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="text.25"/> were adopted here.</p>
      <p id="d1e1340">We trained the PAE on 150 000 random VIIRS cutouts from 2013 and used the remainder of the data from that year (181 184 cutouts) for evaluation. We trained the autoencoder for 10 epochs with a batch size of 256 and achieved good learning loss convergence. We then trained the normalizing flow for 10 epochs (batch size of 64) and also achieved good convergence. The VIIRS-trained ULMO model was then applied to all of the VIIRS and LLC4320 cutouts to calculate LL for each.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Results and discussion</title>
      <p id="d1e1353">We divide the comparison of the VIIRS SST dataset with the LLC4320 model output, in the context of the patterns learned by ULMO, into those related to the shapes of the two LL probability distributions and those related to their geographic distributions.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Overall statistical comparison of VIIRS and LLC4320 LL values</title>
      <p id="d1e1363">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/> compares the distribution of the LL metric for the 9 years of VIIRS observations against the LLC4320 results matched in space and according to the day of the year. The two distributions are quite similar, suggesting that, on average, the SST pattern distribution learned by ULMO from VIIRS is close to the same distribution derived from LLC4320. There are, however, differences, subtle for much of the range of LL values and not so subtle for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">800</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. <list list-type="bullet"><list-item>
      <p id="d1e1382">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">375</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> range corresponds to relatively energetic regions, generally associated with strong currents and large SST gradients <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="paren.26"/>. In these regions, the probability of finding a VIIRS cutout with a given LL value is lower than that of finding an LLC4320 cutout with the same LL value. This suggests that in dynamic regions, LLC4320 fields tend to have slightly more structure than VIIRS fields, i.e., that the fields are possibly more energetic. An example of cutouts in this LL range is discussed in the paragraphs following the bolded text of <italic>Gulf Stream</italic> in  Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSS2"/>.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e1408">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">375</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">375</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> range corresponds to mid-range fields, generally found at mid-latitudes (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>a), away from eastern and western boundary currents. The probability of finding a VIIRS cutout with a given structure (LL value) in this LL range is increasingly higher, as LL increases from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>375 to 375, than that of finding an LLC4320 cutout within this LL range. An example of cutouts in this LL range is discussed in  the paragraphs following the bolded text of <italic>Southern Ocean</italic> in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSS2"/>.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e1444">In the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">375</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">800</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> range, the probability for the LLC4320 of finding a given LL value is higher – less structure – than for VIIRS. SST fields with these LL<?pagebreak page7149?> values have relatively little structure with retrieval and instrument noise associated with the satellite-derived fields having a relatively larger impact on their observed structure. As noted in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS2"/>, white noise was added to the LLC4320 fields in an attempt to remove the importance of noise in determining the LL value, but, in retrospect, the level of noise may not have been sufficient to address this, hence the higher probability of finding LLC4320 cutouts in this range. Cutouts of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">375</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> tend to be found equatorward of approximately <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e1490">For the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">800</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> range, the probability distribution for LLC4320 LL values levels off at 800, falling rapidly to 0 for values larger than 1100 or so. By contrast, few VIIRS cutouts have LL values greater than 800. This is likely due to noise in the satellite-derived SST cutouts as well as unresolved clouds, discussed in  the paragraphs following the bolded text of <italic>Equatorial band</italic> in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSS2"/>.</p></list-item></list></p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e1512">Histograms of the LL metric for the full sample of VIIRS and LLC4320 cutouts.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/16/7143/2023/gmd-16-7143-2023-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Geographic comparison of {$\widetilde{\mathrm{LL}}_{\mathrm{VIIRS}}$} and {$\widetilde{\mathrm{LL}}_{{\mathrm{LLC}}}$} values}?><title>Geographic comparison of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VIIRS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LLC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values</title>
      <p id="d1e1558">As mentioned in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS1"/>, we compare the geographic distribution of VIIRS LLs with that of LLC4320, based on the HEALPix-tesselated surface covering the entire Earth: 41 952 equal-area spatial cells, each of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 km <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 km size. Within each cell, we consider the distribution of LL values from the VIIRS data and LLC4320 output. To minimize the effects of outliers within the distributions, we utilize the median LL value (designated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> hereinafter) as a characteristic metric of the structure in SST at a given location. Furthermore, we only consider HEALPix cells containing at least five VIIRS cutouts and five LLC4320 cutouts. The distributions for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VIIRS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LLC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/> and their difference, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VIIRS</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LLC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, in  Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>. Recall that LL tends to increase with decreasing structure in the SSTa field; hence positive values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> suggest less structure in the satellite-derived cutouts than in the cutouts of the model output, and negative values suggest the contrary.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e1672">HEALPix median LL for <bold>(a)</bold> VIIRS cutouts (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VIIRS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), <bold>(b)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LLC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(c)</bold> the zonal average of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VIIRS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <bold>(d)</bold> the zonal average of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LLC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Each dot in <bold>(a)</bold> and <bold>(b)</bold> is associated with an equal-area HEALPix cell. White dots correspond to locations with fewer than five VIIRS cutouts and fewer than five LLC4320 cutouts in the HEALPix cell. Land is shown in gray.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=355.659449pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/16/7143/2023/gmd-16-7143-2023-f04.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e1759"><bold>(a)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VIIRS</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LLC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. <bold>(b)</bold> Zonal mean of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VIIRS</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LLC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. It is apparent that the LLC4320 model has SST patterns with less structure in equatorial regions. In contrast, the dynamic regions of the global ocean (e.g., western boundary currents) exhibit lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LLC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, indicating a higher degree of structure within these areas in the model output. </p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=355.659449pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/16/7143/2023/gmd-16-7143-2023-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1835">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/> suggests that there are significant differences between the submesoscale-to-mesoscale structure of the simulation and that of the satellite-derived dataset. However, closer examination of the two plots in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/> suggests that there is significant similarity in the larger scale (more than several hundred kilometers) of the two fields; our eyes are drawn to the differences, the large red equatorial regions and blue regions at higher latitudes, not the similarities. We therefore begin by examining the similarities of the fields and then consider their differences.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>4.2.1</label><title>Similarities</title>
      <p id="d1e1849">To highlight the similarities in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> fields on smaller scales (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), we remove the large regional differences from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LLC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> apparent between them (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>). This is done by averaging <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VIIRS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LLC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over 100 sequential values based on the HEALPix index. HEALPix cells are arranged longitudinally, so this correction removes zonal structures on the order of 10 000 km or longer, retaining structures on smaller spatial scales.  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VIIRS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (black) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LLC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (cyan) are shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>. A “corrected” <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LLC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, designated as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LLC</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, is then determined from
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M117" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LLC</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LLC</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:munder><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LLC</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VIIRS</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> all HEALPix cells with at least five cutouts in the VIIRS dataset and five cutouts in the LLC4320 dataset of
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M119" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mrow><mml:mo mathsize="1.5em">⌊</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo mathsize="1.5em">⌋</mml:mo><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mo mathsize="1.5em">⌊</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo mathsize="1.5em">⌋</mml:mo><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⌊</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>⌋</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes the largest integer less than or equal to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LLC</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values are shown in red in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e2179"> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> versus HEALPix cell index: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VIIRS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values are black dots, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LLC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values are cyan, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LLC</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values are red. </p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/16/7143/2023/gmd-16-7143-2023-f06.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e2242">The plots, in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>, bin each HEALPix cell by their associated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> values. The left histogram bins the cells according to their <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VIIRS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LLC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values, whereas the right histogram bins according to their <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VIIRS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LLC</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values. As noted in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>, cutouts in the LLC dataset skew to higher LL values than those found in the VIIRS dataset. The difference in the LL distributions can also be seen in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>a, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LLC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values, greater than approximately 200, tend to be higher than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VIIRS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values with the separation increasing with LL. It is important to note that here we have binned the HEALPix cells and their <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> values, not the cutouts and their LL values. Correcting the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LLC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values lowered the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LLC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values to be more in line with the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VIIRS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e2404"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VIIRS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LLC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values of each HEALPix cell are plotted in a 2-dimensional histogram on the left, whereas the right 2-dimensional histogram bins cells according to their <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VIIRS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LLC</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values. The same color bar is used for both histograms; colors range from blue (a lower cell count) to red (a higher cell count). </p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/16/7143/2023/gmd-16-7143-2023-f07.png"/>

          </fig>

      <?pagebreak page7151?><p id="d1e2470">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VIIRS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> geographic distribution is shown  with that of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LLC</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>. The large-scale similarities in the general shape of the distributions is much more evident in this figure, but of more interest are the many smaller-scale features, which emerge in the corrected distribution. Consider, for example, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> fields at approximately <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">45</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> S in the black and red polygons of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>. For both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VIIRS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LLC</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> there is a local maximum in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> corresponding to a minimum in the structure of the SSTa cutouts in the black polygon. This feature is associated with a zonal bathymetric ridge at approximately <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">45</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> S crossed by two meridional ridges, one at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> W and the other at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">39</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> W (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>b, although the ridges are difficult to see in this figure). The peaks of these ridges are at depths of approximately 5000 m in a basin extending to depths of 6000 m.  Both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> fields show a band of negative <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> values to the west and south of the feature. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VIIRS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> field also shows a well-defined band to the north and east, while the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LLC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fields only shows a suggestion of such a band, but the local minimum is still well defined in both.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e2669">As in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/> except <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LLC</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is shown in <bold>(b)</bold>. </p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=355.659449pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/16/7143/2023/gmd-16-7143-2023-f08.jpg"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{9}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d1e2701">As in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/> but with a palette constrained to better show features in the two focus area: black polygon at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 35<inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W, 45<inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S and red polygon at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E, 50<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S. </p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=355.659449pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/16/7143/2023/gmd-16-7143-2023-f09.jpg"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{10}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d1e2766"><bold>(a)</bold> Uncorrected <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LLC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. <bold>(b)</bold> Bathymetry. Focus regions: black polygon at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 35<inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W, 45<inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S and red polygon at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E, 50<inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S. Dotted black and solid magenta lines in the focus area encircled with the red polygon were manually digitized from Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>a and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>a for VIIRS and LLC4320, respectively. </p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=355.659449pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/16/7143/2023/gmd-16-7143-2023-f10.jpg"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e2849">The second feature of interest is the thin, hooked band of low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VIIRS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values – corresponding to relatively more structure in the cutouts – in the red polygon south of South Africa (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>a). This band is reproduced well in the LLC4320 output (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>b). Again, referring to the bathymetric image (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>b), it is clear that the shape of this feature is a consequence of the underlying bathymetry. Specifically, it appears that a tendril of the retroflected Agulhas Current has flowed to the south before turning toward the east to pass through a gap in the southwest–northeast ridge, partially blocking the main part of the retroflected current. The top of the ridge is found at depths of approximately 2000 m, while the relatively wide gap, through which the tendril passes, is as deep as 3500 m. The manually digitized center of the feature is shown with the dotted black and solid magenta lines in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>b; the model appears to reproduce this subtle feature in the circulation quite accurately.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSS2">
  <label>4.2.2</label><title>Differences</title>
      <?pagebreak page7153?><p id="d1e2882">To highlight the regional distributions with significant differences between the structure of satellite-derived and LLC4320-produced SSTa cutouts, we replot the data of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/> in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/> but mask all values between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>197 and 197 in dark gray. These thresholds determine what <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>LL values we consider to be statistically significant; they are the differences in the LL distributions from the first 4 years, 2012–2015, to the last 4 years, 2017–2020, of VIIRS data. Any <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VIIRS</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LLC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> differences within those given thresholds can be attributed to statistical variability between the simulation of a free-running model and observational data. HEALPix cells with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>LL values beyond these thresholds correspond to regions either for which the retrieved VIIRS cutouts are not good measures of SST or for which the LLC4320 output is associated with deficiencies in the simulation (see Appendix A for more detail).</p>
      <p id="d1e2935"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VIIRS</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LLC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> differences evident in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/> fall into three general groupings: the wide band of negative values (more structure in the VIIRS cutouts than in the LLC4320 cutouts) centered on the Equator; the less continuous band of positive values in the Southern Ocean; and the very positive (much more LLC4320 structure than VIIRS structure) patches in the vicinity of the separation of western boundary currents from the continental margin, specifically, the Gulf Stream in the western North Atlantic, the Kuroshio in the western North Pacific, the Brazil Current in the South Atlantic, and the Agulhas Current where it retroflects south of South Africa. The equatorial and Southern Ocean bands are also evident in the zonal mean of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VIIRS</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LLC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the <italic>un</italic>masked field shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>b. The zonal mean is roughly flat at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>350 from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> S to the Equator; rises rapidly poleward of these two points for about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of latitude to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>150; and then continues to increase approximately linearly but, more slowly, from there (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> S and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> N) to a value of 0 at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> N and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> S.</p>
      <p id="d1e3080">In the text to follow, we address each of the three regions primarily in the context of SST galleries constructed from two small and geographically close regions (three colored rectangles shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>), which exemplify characteristics of the differences that we find to be of interest.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F11" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{11}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 11</label><caption><p id="d1e3088">As in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>a with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VIIRS</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LLC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">197</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> masked darker gray to highlight the significant differences between VIIRS observations and the LLC4320 model outputs. The yellow rectangle (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 110<inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W, 0<inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N) designates the focus area for galleries shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F14"/>, highlighting equatorial differences; the green rectangle (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 120<inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E, 55<inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S) designates the focus area for galleries shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F16"/>, highlighting Southern Ocean differences; and the cyan rectangle (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 70<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W, 35<inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N) designates the focus area for galleries shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F18"/>, highlighting western boundary current differences. </p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=355.659449pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/16/7143/2023/gmd-16-7143-2023-f11.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSSx1" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Equatorial band</title>
      <p id="d1e3220">In general, there are four possibilities for low values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VIIRS</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LLC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the equatorial region (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> S to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> N).</p>
      <p id="d1e3271"><list list-type="order">
              <list-item>

      <?pagebreak page7154?><p id="d1e3276"><italic>The year simulated, 2012, is atypical, differing from the 2012–2020 mean.</italic> This is very unlikely given the magnitude of the differences, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>350 at the Equator, as well as the fact that the zonal mean of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>2012–2015</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>2017–2020</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is essentially flat at 0 equatorward of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.S1.F21"/>), suggesting little interannual variability.</p>
              </list-item>
              <list-item>

      <p id="d1e3329"><italic>Unresolved clouds exist in the VIIRS cutouts.</italic> Unresolved clouds tend to add structure to the cutouts; the “quieter” the field is, the more significant the impact noise is on the structure and the greater the decrease will be in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>. To address this potential problem, the 194 cutouts of the HEALPix cell at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">36</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> N, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">112</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> W were examined for unresolved clouds. Thirty percent were found to be of high quality, 50 % were found to be significantly contaminated, and there was uncertainty as to how to classify the remaining 20 %. Calculating mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VIIRS</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LLC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the high-quality-only cutouts increased the mean value by 43, which is small compared to the difference of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">350</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for this HEALPix cell, so this is not likely the primary explanation for the differences. We further address this issue below in the context of galleries of SST fields.</p>
              </list-item>
              <list-item>

      <p id="d1e3410"><italic>Noise exists in the VIIRS SST fields.</italic> Cutouts in this part of the ocean tend to have relatively high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> values (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>a), corresponding to relatively less structure. This means that noise in the field, which is assumed to change slowly if at all with latitude, will become relatively more important, decreasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>. Noise has been added to the LLC4320 SST fields in an attempt to address this, but it is possibly not enough, resulting in more negative values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VIIRS</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LLC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
              </list-item>
              <list-item>

      <p id="d1e3464"><italic>LLC4320 does not reproduce the submesoscale-to-mesoscale structure well in the equatorial regions.</italic> There is a suggestion based on the examination of a small patch of this region, discussed below, that the model is missing structure in at least some parts of this region.</p>
              </list-item>
            </list></p>
      <?pagebreak page7155?><p id="d1e3471">The rectangular patch [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> S–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> N, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">105</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">95</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> W] west of the Galapagos Islands in the equatorial Pacific (the yellow rectangle in Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F12"/>) stands out because of the significant step of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VIIRS</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LLC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> along the Equator. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> distribution for the region in the rectangle above the Equator is provided in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F13"/>a, as well as below the Equator in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F13"/>c. Consistent with the geographic distributions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>, the median <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LLC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value increases from south to north across the Equator, while the median <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VIIRS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value decreases, both contributing to a larger structural difference between VIIRS cutouts and LLC4320 cutouts to the north of the Equator than that to the south. Histograms of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are provided because there is a correlation, although weak, between LL and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, while <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a more readily understood measure of similarity and differences between VIIRS and LLC4320 SST fields.  The distribution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LLC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is similar across the Equator, while that of VIIRS shows a much longer tail consistent with more variability and lower LL values.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F12" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{12}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 12</label><caption><p id="d1e3647"><bold>(a)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VIIRS</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LLC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the equatorial Pacific and Atlantic. <bold>(b)</bold> The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the number of cutouts per HEALPix cell. Thick horizontal black line is the Equator. Yellow rectangle is the focus area. </p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=355.659449pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/16/7143/2023/gmd-16-7143-2023-f12.jpg"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F13" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{13}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 13</label><caption><p id="d1e3699"><bold>(a)</bold> Histograms of LL for all VIIRS (yellow) and LLC4320 (green) cutouts above the Equator in the focus area. <bold>(b)</bold> Histograms of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the same region as <bold>(a)</bold>. <bold>(c)</bold> As for <bold>(a)</bold> except below the Equator. <bold>(d)</bold> As for <bold>(b)</bold> except below the Equator. The median values of the distributions are indicated for <bold>(a)</bold> and <bold>(c)</bold>, as are the number of cutouts contributing to each. The number of cutouts apply to the corresponding <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> frames.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/16/7143/2023/gmd-16-7143-2023-f13.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e3755">Visual examination of the SST fields supports the above conclusions. Consider SST fields of the VIIRS and LLC4320 cutouts in the yellow rectangle of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F12"/>, again separating them into those above the Equator and those below. Galleries of nine cutouts each are shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F14"/>. As previously noted each VIIRS cutout was matched in space and according to the day of the year with an LLC4320 cutout. To generate the galleries shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F14"/>, two sets of cutout pairs were formed. One set consisted of 40 % of all pairs in the region for which the VIIRS LL values were closest to the median VIIRS LL value for the region. The second set was similarly constructed, except being based on LLC4320 LL values. The intersection of the two sets defined the pool from which nine cutout pairs were randomly drawn. These pairs for the region above the Equator, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> N and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">105</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">95</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> W, are shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F14"/>a and b. For each VIIRS cutout in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F14"/>a, its LLC4320 partner is shown in the same location in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F14"/>b. Similarly, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F14"/>c and d show pairs for the region below the Equator. (Remember that because the LLC4320 simulation is free running, there is no reason to expect the features in the pairs to be identical or even similar; it is the structure of the fields that is of interest.) Visually, the SST fields of the LLC4320 cutouts are very similar in both regions, showing very little structure with correspondingly large LL values. The VIIRS fields below the Equator show a little more structure than the LLC4320 fields, consistent with the smaller LL values. By contrast, most of the VIIRS fields above the Equator have significantly more structure than any of those in the other three galleries, with correspondingly lower LL values. Also evident in the VIIRS galleries are blemishes in the fields, scattered regions of colder temperatures. We believe these to be unresolved clouds, i.e., clouds not detected by the retrieval algorithm. Because they add structure to the fields, we believe that they decrease the LL value of the cutout. This would reduce the magnitude of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VIIRS</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LLC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> both above and below the Equator but is not likely to significantly impact the observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VIIRS</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">above</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VIIRS</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">below</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Also, note that the distribution of the number of cutouts per HEALPix cell is symmetric about the Equator in the area of interest (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F12"/>b), suggesting that the contribution of clouds to corruption of the LL<?pagebreak page7156?> values is also symmetric about the Equator in the rectangle of interest.</p>
      <p id="d1e3876">Another possible explanation for the lack of SST structure in the equatorial region is the limited spatiotemporal resolution of the prescribed atmospheric forcing (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.14</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 6-hourly).  A recently completed coupled ocean–atmosphere simulation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31 bib1.bibx18 bib1.bibx8" id="paren.27"/> provides high-frequency/wavenumber interactive forcing (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0625</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 45 s) to the ocean. We intend to repeat the present analysis on this simulation to determine whether the equatorial SST structures of this coupled simulation are more similar to VIIRS.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F14" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{14}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 14</label><caption><p id="d1e3908"><bold>(a)</bold> Gallery for VIIRS cutouts above the Equator in the yellow rectangle of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F12"/>a. <bold>(b)</bold> As in <bold>(a)</bold> but for LLC4320 cutouts. <bold>(c)</bold> VIIRS cutouts below the Equator in the yellow rectangle of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F12"/>a. <bold>(d)</bold>  As in <bold>(c)</bold> but for LLC4320 cutouts. The mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for all cutouts in the given region (e.g., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> N, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">105</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">95</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> W for <bold>a</bold>) follow the dataset name and the numbers following in parentheses are the mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the cutouts in the gallery. The date (month/day/year) and time of each VIIRS cutout is shown above it, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for that cutout follow in parentheses. The date of the corresponding LLC4320 cutout (same position in the LLC4320 gallery) is the same as that of the VIIRS cutout. The time is the closest of 00:00 and 12:00 GMT to the VIIRS time. It is evident that the gallery from the VIIRS observations above the Equator shows greater structure than any of the other subsets. </p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=384.112205pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/16/7143/2023/gmd-16-7143-2023-f14.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSSx2" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Southern Ocean</title>
      <p id="d1e4048">We examine the same four possibilities for high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VIIRS</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LLC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values in the Southern Ocean as we did for low values in the equatorial region. <?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
<list list-type="order"><list-item>
      <p id="d1e4079"><italic>The year simulated, 2012, is atypical, differing from the 2012–2020 mean.</italic> This is possible but unlikely given the extent of the region covered by anomalously high differences and that there were few differences in this region for which <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>2012–2015</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>2017–2020</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exceeded the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> threshold.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e4119"><italic>Unresolved clouds exist in the VIIRS fields.</italic> This is very unlikely because clouds in the VIIRS fields would tend to increase the structure, which would decrease <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>. Hence <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VIIRS</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LLC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> would become more positive than if clouds are not present in the VIIRS fields, rendering the difference more anomalous, not less so.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e4159"><italic>Noise exists in the VIIRS SST fields.</italic> This is unlikely because the geophysical variability in SST in these regions tends to overwhelm noise in the VIIRS cutouts. Furthermore, noise in the VIIRS cutouts would tend to reduce the associated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>, rendering the differences between uncontaminated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> VIIRS values and those obtained from the LLC4320 simulation even larger.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e4185"><italic>LLC4320 does not reproduce the submesoscale-to-mesoscale structure well in the Southern Ocean.</italic> There is a suggestion based on the examination of small patches of this region, which we discuss in more detail below, that the model has more structure in this region than is recorded in actual observations. This indicates that the mixed layer or energy dissipation and stirring due to subgrid-scale physics are not represented with sufficient accuracy in these regions.</p></list-item></list></p>
      <p id="d1e4190">In Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F15"/>c, we replot the masked <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VIIRS</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LLC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> field of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/> for the Southern Ocean south of Australia with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VIIRS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LLC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the same region in the upper two panels. The band of low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VIIRS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LLC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values from 45  to 70<inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E at about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">41</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> S corresponds to the significant structure in the field associated with the Antarctic Circumpolar Current (ACC). (Note that this band originates south of South Africa where the Agulhas retroflection joins the ACC, the band of negative values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VIIRS</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LLC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>.) It appears that the ACC as modeled by LLC4320 for 2012 is slightly to the south of the VIIRS ACC for 2012–2020, with the positive values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VIIRS</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LLC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> south of the band and the corresponding negative values to the north of the band. Although a small shift, the fact that the width of the bands for both VIIRS and LLC4320 is virtually identical suggests that the modeled ACC is a bit to the south of the envelope of paths in this period; i.e., the slight shift may be significant in the context of the modeled processes. Apart from the slight shift to the south, the model appears to have reproduced the current quite well in this region. East of about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">70</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> E <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> for the modeled ACC is substantially more negative than that of the observed values, resulting in the anomalous <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VIIRS</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LLC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values in this region. Interestingly, east of about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">95</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> E, the VIIRS field shows a positive band north and south of the northern branch of the current, as does the LLC4320 field. In fact, the general pattern of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LLC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has the same general shape as that of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VIIRS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Therefore it appears that the model has the correct general structure for the flow in this region but, as we now emphasize, is too energetic.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F15" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{15}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 15</label><caption><p id="d1e4439">For the focus area of the Southern Ocean, <bold>(a)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VIIRS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(b)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LLC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <bold>(c)</bold> masked <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VIIRS</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LLC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The black rectangle (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 116<inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E, 50<inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S) indicates a region of agreement, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VIIRS</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LLC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">63</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The white rectangle (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 120<inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E, 54<inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S) is an anomalous region with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VIIRS</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LLC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">335</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/16/7143/2023/gmd-16-7143-2023-f15.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e4615">Galleries of SSTa cutouts in the black rectangles of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F15"/> (a region for which the model <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> values are in general agreement with the VIIRS values) are shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F16"/>a for VIIRS and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F16"/>b for LLC4320. Galleries for the anomalous region, the white rectangles in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F15"/>, are shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F16"/>c for VIIRS and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F16"/>d for LLC4320. Cutouts for these galleries were randomly selected as described for the generation of galleries for the equatorial region (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F14"/>). The anomalous behavior is clear in the lower two panels; the LLC4320 fields are much bolder with substantially lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> values and larger <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values than the VIIRS cutouts. The LLC4320 fields are clearly more energetic. By contrast, LLC4320 cutouts in the region<?pagebreak page7158?> for which there appears to be agreement are more similar to VIIRS cutouts.</p>
      <p id="d1e4664">One possible explanation for more energetic SST fields in LLC4320 relative to VIIRS is the fact that LLC4320 was inadvertently forced with tidal potential that is 10 % more energetic than the real ocean <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36 bib1.bibx2" id="paren.28"/>, resulting in, for example, more energetic internal tides than observed.  A second, in our opinion more likely, explanation is that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">48</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> horizontal grid spacing of the simulation, although sufficient to enable the gravest modes of mixed-layer instabilities to be captured, is insufficient to fully represent the smaller-scale instabilities that would damp the magnitude of the resolved instabilities.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F16" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{16}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 16</label><caption><p id="d1e4688"><bold>(a)</bold> Gallery of nine randomly selected VIIRS cutouts within the black rectangle of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F15"/>, the region of “agreement”. <bold>(b)</bold> Similarly for LLC4320 cutouts in the same region of agreement. <bold>(c)</bold> VIIRS cutouts in the anomalous region of the white rectangle in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F15"/>. <bold>(d)</bold> Same as <bold>(c)</bold> but for LLC4320 cutouts. Dates (month/day/year), times, LL, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F14"/>.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=384.112205pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/16/7143/2023/gmd-16-7143-2023-f16.jpg"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSSx3" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Gulf Stream</title>
      <p id="d1e4735">The conclusions for the four possibilities of high values in the Gulf Stream are similar to those for the Southern Ocean.</p>
      <p id="d1e4738"><list list-type="order">
              <list-item>

      <p id="d1e4743"><italic>The year simulated, 2012, is atypical, differing from the 2012–2020 mean.</italic> This is very unlikely given, as will be shown below, that the modeled Gulf Stream is south of the most extreme southern positions of paths of the Gulf Stream from a number of observational sources.</p>
              </list-item>
              <list-item>

      <?pagebreak page7159?><p id="d1e4751"><italic>Unresolved clouds exist in the VIIRS fields.</italic> This is very unlikely because clouds in the VIIRS fields would tend to increase the structure, i.e., decrease <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>. Hence cloud-free fields would tend to increase <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VIIRS</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LLC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, rendering it more anomalous. <?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?></p>
              </list-item>
              <list-item>

      <p id="d1e4794"><italic>Noise exists in the VIIRS SST fields.</italic> This is unlikely because the geophysical variability in SST in these regions overwhelms noise in the VIIRS fields, but, if it were to contribute, it would again increase <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VIIRS</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LLC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, rendering it more anomalous.</p>
              </list-item>
              <list-item>

      <p id="d1e4826"><italic>LLC4320 does not reproduce the submesoscale-to-mesoscale structure well in the Gulf Stream region.</italic> As will be shown below, this is likely the cause of the differences, but, unlike the differences in the Southern Ocean, we believe that these differences are due to premature separation of the Gulf Stream from the continental margin; i.e., the Gulf Stream is in the wrong place as opposed to it being in the correct location but too energetic as appears to be the case in the ACC south of Australia.</p>
              </list-item>
            </list></p>
      <p id="d1e4833">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F17"/>a shows <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VIIRS</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LLC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the Gulf Stream region downstream of the point at which it separates from the continental margin. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F17"/>b shows the same data but masked, showing only the HEALPix cells with values exceeding the thresholds identified in Appendix A, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>197. Also shown in these plots is the mean path of the Gulf Stream (magenta line) and its northern and southern extent (black lines). These were determined from manual digitizations of the path of the stream – defined as the maximum cross-stream SST gradient in the vicinity of the stream – in warmest-pixel composites of all AVHRR 1 km  SST fields in contiguous 2 d intervals <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="paren.29"/>. The mean path of the stream was determined by averaging, over all 2 d composites between 1982 and 1999, the point at which these paths intersected integral degrees of longitude. The northern and southern extents are the latitudes for which 99 % of the paths lie to the south – the northern extent – and 99 % lie to the north – the southern extent – for 1982–1999. Large positive differences south of the southern extreme suggest that the LLC4320 output<?pagebreak page7160?> contains more structure in its cutouts than VIIRS, whereas VIIRS fields show more structure within the bounds of the northern and southern extremes.</p>
      <p id="d1e4874">The large patch of positive values west of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> W corresponds to the premature separation of the modeled Gulf Stream from the continental margin reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="text.30"/> based on the mean path and extreme envelope of paths shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F17"/> and on the  Ocean Surface Current Analyses Real-time (OSCAR) surface currents (<uri>https://podaac.jpl.nasa.gov/</uri>, last access: 1 November 2023, dataset list; search keywords: oceans, ocean circulation; projects: OSCAR) for 2012. Simply put, the modeled Gulf Stream is found some 250 km to the south of the mean observed stream at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">70</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> W and approximately 100 km to the south of the southern extreme observed between 1982 and 1986.</p>
      <p id="d1e4910">The cause of the positive and negative anomalous values of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F17"/>b become more clear from the individual plots of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VIIRS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LLC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F17"/>c and d, respectively. The most negative values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> are seen in the satellite-derived fields along the edge of the continental slope and, in particular, south of Georges Bank, south of the eastern side of the Gulf of Maine, and south and east of the Grand Banks. (Note that the relatively sharp gradient in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> values follows the 200 m isobath, shown as dotted red lines in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F17"/>.) Values remain low to the southern extreme of the Gulf Stream. Recall that these HEALPix values are medians obtained from all cutouts in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-year interval. During this period the Gulf Stream meanders in the envelope with regions of significant structure at some times and regions of less structure at others, resulting in less structure on average than is found near the shelf break in very active regions that are topographically constrained – south of Georges Bank and south and east of the Grand Banks. The LLC4320 output also shows the most negative values south of Georges Bank but less so south of the Grand Banks. This is likely associated with the premature separation of the stream from the continental margin, the negative values of LL between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">65</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">75</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> W and south of about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">36</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> N. Two aspects of interest associated with the model field after separating are (1) the relatively smaller<?pagebreak page7161?> width (meridional extent) of the region covered by the Gulf Stream immediately after separation when compared with the broader distribution associated with the VIIRS data and the rapid increase in LL values – decrease in structure – at approximately <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">62</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (the stream appears to die at that point) and (2) the positive LL values east of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> W and south of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> N, the cause of the statistically significant negative differences when compared with the VIIRS results. The former may be due to the fact that model simulation is only for 1 year, while the VIIRS data cover <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> years. The reasons for the rapid die-off of the stream and the relative quietness (larger values of LL) east of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">62</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are not obvious.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F17" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{17}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 17</label><caption><p id="d1e5075"><bold>(a)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VIIRS</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LLC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the Gulf Stream region after separation from the continental margin. <bold>(b)</bold> Masked <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VIIRS</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LLC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the same area. <bold>(c)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VIIRS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. <bold>(d)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LLC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Thick magenta line shows the mean Gulf Stream path digitized from 2 d AVHRR SST composites for 1982–1999. Thick black lines show the envelope containing 98 % of these paths for the same period, with 1 % of the digitized paths at any given longitude falling shoreward of the envelope and 1 % falling seaward of it. Dotted red line is the 200 m isobath. Red and white rectangles show the focus areas from which galleries of cutouts are selected for Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F18"/>.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/16/7143/2023/gmd-16-7143-2023-f17.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e5174">Next, we examine VIIRS and LLC4320 cutouts inside the Gulf Stream envelope (the white rectangles in Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F17"/>c and d at [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">42</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> N, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> W] and outside the observed Gulf Stream in the region of anomalously low LLC4320 values associated with the premature separation of the Gulf Stream (the red rectangles in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F17"/>c and d at [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">36</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> N, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">70</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> W]). Galleries of nine cutouts each for both VIIRS and LLC4320 for both regions are shown in  Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F18"/>. Cutouts for these galleries were randomly selected as described for the generation of galleries for the equatorial region (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F14"/>). The characteristics of the VIIRS cutouts outside of the Gulf Stream (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F18"/>c) differ substantially from those of the other three galleries, as does the mean LL. VIIRS cutouts within the stream (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F18"/>a) are similar to those in the LLC4320 gallery of cutouts south of the Gulf Stream (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F18"/>d), consistent with the suggestion that the modeled stream separates prematurely from the continental margin. The structure of LLC4320 cutouts in the Gulf Stream (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F18"/>b) lies between that of VIIRS cutouts in the stream (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F18"/>a) and LLC4320 cutouts south of the stream (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F18"/>d), as do the LL values. This is consistent with the modeled stream being to the south of the observed stream.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F18" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{18}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 18</label><caption><p id="d1e5278"><bold>(a)</bold> Gallery for VIIRS cutouts in the white rectangle of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F17"/>c. <bold>(b)</bold> Same for LLC4320 cutouts in the white rectangle of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F17"/>d. <bold>(c)</bold> VIIRS cutouts in the red rectangle of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F17"/>c. <bold>(d)</bold> LLC4320 cutouts in the red rectangle of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F17"/>d. Dates (month/day/year), times, LL, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F14"/>.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=384.112205pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/16/7143/2023/gmd-16-7143-2023-f18.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e5330">In this paper we set out to compare outputs from the well-adopted LLC4320 simulation with a large dataset of global observations. Specifically, we have focused on the submesoscale dynamics traced by SST, an observable metric with decades of global coverage provided by a series of sensors on remote sensing satellites. This paper used L2 data from VIIRS, restricted to nearly clear (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">98</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % cloud free) cutouts with dimensions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 150 km <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 150 km selected across the ocean.</p>
      <p id="d1e5357">Our approach for quantitative comparison between data and the model is unconventional.  We trained a deep learning probabilistic autoencoder (PAE) on the VIIRS data to learn the distribution of SSTa patterns observed in the ocean and then applied this PAE to geographically and seasonally matched SSTa cutouts from the LLC4320 model. An advantage of this approach is that it is intentionally unsupervised; the network learned from the data the features most characteristic of ocean dynamics traced by SST. On the flip side, the results – especially any differences between data and the model – are more difficult to interpret. The LL metric calculated from the PAE is known to correlate with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and other physical measures of SST yet with significant scatter <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="paren.31"/>. And uncertainties are not inherently calculated; instead we have estimated them by applying ULMO to two independent subsets of VIIRS data.</p>
      <p id="d1e5373">Proceeding in this manner, we found that, in general, the distribution of SSTa patterns present in the VIIRS observations are predicted well by the LLC4320 model (e.g., Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>). Globally, the medians of the LL distributions from VIIRS and LLC4320 agree within <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for 65 % of the ocean (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>). However, there is a modest but significant and latitude-dependent offset between data and the model, with the latter exhibiting less structure in the SSTa cutouts near the Equator and greater structure towards the poles. After correcting for this latitude-dependent offset, we find that the model frequently recovers mesoscale features imprinted in the LL distributions and seen in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VIIRS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> field. This includes the reproduction of detailed mesoscale dynamics often forced by deep bathymetric features. We emphasize here that the VIIRS–LLC4320 comparison is being performed on spatial scales of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km) and less and that it is changes in the structure at these scales that inform the large-scale patterns observed; i.e., the submesoscale structure of cutouts  appears to be tied to larger-scale processes. One may conclude that the LLC4320 model has captured salient mesoscale dynamics across the majority of the ocean.</p>
      <p id="d1e5416">There are, however, a few notable exceptions.  One of these is the location of the Gulf Stream, a previously known failure of the LLC4320 simulation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="paren.32"/>. Giving confidence to the approach taken in this paper to evaluate the performance of the LLC4320 simulation is the fact that a known region of concern is clearly identified as problematic.</p>
      <p id="d1e5423">A more subtle difference occurs at the Equator. We have shown from the VIIRS data that the structure in the SSTa cutouts just north of the Equator exceeds that of its southern counterpart (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F14"/>). This difference in SSTa in VIIRS, however,  is not reproduced by the LLC4320 simulation, and there is no reason to believe that cross-Equator differences in the VIIRS data are spurious.</p>
      <p id="d1e5428">Third, we highlighted inconsistencies between the LLC4320 model and VIIRS observations in the ACC, where the former frequently exhibits a higher degree of structure in SST and, presumably, more energetic surface currents. We attribute this increased structure to a misrepresentation of the mixed layer and of subgrid-scale processes that are responsible for energy dissipation and stirring.</p>
      <p id="d1e5431">We hope that our analysis will inspire similar investigations of both global and regional models. With the construction of large, well-curated datasets, as we have done with VIIRS, one may construct a series of tests. The construction of such a dataset requires intentional decisions on how to<?pagebreak page7162?> extract and preprocess cutouts for direct comparison to model outputs. Furthermore, the data volume of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="script">O</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(100 TB) is large enough to require best practices with storage, databases, and computing. The authors provide their code (including workflow) with the paper and encourage discussion with parties interested in building their own similar analyses.</p>
      <p id="d1e5441">We also wish to emphasize several of the weaknesses of our methodology and identify paths for improvement in future work. First, and perhaps foremost, we have not accounted for the mismatch in effective spatial resolution between the model and observations.  The pixelization of the L2 VIIRS product is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 750 m at nadir and hence can resolve features in the range of a few kilometers. The LLC4320 simulation, meanwhile, has the finest cell size of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 km, but the formulation is not expected to properly resolve features on scales less than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km (see, e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="altparen.33"/>). We considered smoothing (i.e., degrading) the VIIRS data to better match the model outputs but were not confident that we could do so with high accuracy. Furthermore, the PAE itself is effectively smoothing the data by passing each cutout through a 512-dimensional bottleneck (e.g., see Fig. 3 of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="altparen.34"/>).</p>
      <p id="d1e5478">Related to the above discussion, the initial analysis ignored latitude dependence in the SST structure, despite the predicted and observed dynamical differences driven by geophysical fluid dynamics.  Further work might, for example, vary the size of the cutouts proportional to the Rossby radius of deformation. Similarly, if we were to expand the cutout size to larger scales to better assess mesoscale features, it may become necessary to match the orientation of the data (here dictated by the satellite path) with the model (fixed with rows and columns parallel to longitude and latitude).</p>
      <?pagebreak page7163?><p id="d1e5481">Another weakness of our implementation is the lack of any error estimation from the PAE outputs (i.e., for individual LL values). This is a general weakness of deep learning algorithms (but see Bayesian neural networks; e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="altparen.35"/>). Therefore, we approached uncertainty estimation using an empirical estimate generated from subsets of the data (see Appendix A). While effective, it is approximate and relies on the central limit theorem to assume a Gaussian deviate. Relatedly, the LL metric of ULMO has no intrinsically physical, mathematical, or statistical (despite the name) meaning! Future work focused on comparisons of SSTa or other patterns may consider the scattering transform <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19 bib1.bibx5" id="paren.36"/>, which has a sound mathematical underpinning and may allow for proper statistical tests.</p>
      <p id="d1e5491">Last, but far from least, are the significant “blemishes” in the data that are absent in the model outputs. Foremost are clouds. The mitigation for clouds adopted here was to (1) limit to cutouts with fewer than 2 % of the pixels masked by the retrieval algorithm <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="paren.37"/> and (2) inpaint these masked pixels. The latter step was required for the PAE and is, in general, required for convolutional neural networks, which expect “complete” fields. In our exploration of the cutouts, however, we identified a high incidence of clouds that were not masked in the VIIRS data. These ranged from minor blemishes in otherwise uniform fields where the clouds generate non-negligible structure (especially evident in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F14"/>a and c) to, in a few cases, corruption of the entire field in the cutout. Another negative consequence, perhaps the most serious, is the terrific reduction in potential data and the resultant geographic biases of the dataset that follow from the 98 % clear criterion (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>). To the greatest extent possible, future work must continue to identify and mitigate clouds;  our own efforts are well underway.</p>
      <p id="d1e5501">As we conclude, we emphasize that perhaps the greatest value of this paper was the construction and now dissemination of the large dataset of cutouts for comparison with ocean models as well as with other satellite-derived SST datasets. This includes the software to generate and analyze them. All of these products are publicly available as described below.</p><?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>

<?pagebreak page7164?><app id="App1.Ch1.S1">
  <?xmltex \currentcnt{A}?><label>Appendix A</label><title>HEALPix uncertainty </title>
      <p id="d1e5516">A question which arises naturally in the context of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/> is what constitutes a statistically significant difference in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> between the model output and the VIIRS fields. To address this, the VIIRS dataset is divided into two 4-year segments, 1 February 2012 through 31 January 2016 (referred to as 2012–2015 hereafter) and 1 January 2017 through 31 December 2020 (2017–2020). Subsequently, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> is calculated for each HEALPix cell for each of the two periods. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.S1.F19"/> shows the distribution of cutouts for the first of the two periods. Because the periods for which these data are being calculated are substantially shorter than that of the dataset from which they are drawn (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>), the number of HEALPix cells with fewer than five cutouts (white in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.S1.F19"/>) is substantially larger.</p>
      <p id="d1e5548">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.S1.F20"/> shows a histogram of the differences in the two <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> fields <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>2012–2015</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>2017–2020</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Also shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.S1.F20"/> is the histogram of the differences in the VIIRS and LLC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> fields, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VIIRS</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LLC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The two vertical black lines denote <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>2012–2015</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>2017–2020</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> distribution. We use these in the body of the paper to identify significant outliers in the fields. There are three primary contributors to the variance of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>2012–2015</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>2017–2020</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> distribution. First, there is the uncertainty associated with the assignment of an LL value by the machine learning algorithm to each cutout within the cell; think of this as instrument noise. Second, cutouts in each cell are being sampled from a 3-dimensional space–time region, with the spatial extent defined by the cell boundaries (approximately 100 km on a side) and the temporal extent defined by the 4-year period from which each distribution is drawn; think of this as the uncertainty in estimated values based on the finite sample size. Third is the difference in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> value between the period covered by the two datasets, i.e., the true geophysical difference. For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>2012–2015</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2017</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2020</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the latter is the difference between 2012–2015 and 2017–2020. For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VIIRS</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LLC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> this would be the difference between the simulated period, 2012, and the period from which the VIIRS data are sampled, 2012–2020. This means that the variability in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>2012–2015</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>2017–2020</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> places an upper bound on uncertainty in the LL values, variability which is due to the position within the cell and the period from which cutouts contributing to the cell are drawn. As shown in the next paragraph, we believe that the geophysical contribution of uncertainty to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>2012–2015</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>2017–2020</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> differences is small; hence the variability in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>2012–2015</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>2017–2020</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a good measure of what constitutes a significant deviation between two datasets. In light of this, we will use 2 standard deviations of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>2012–2015</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>2017–2020</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> distribution to identify regions in which the model output agrees/disagrees with the satellite-derived fields.</p>
      <p id="d1e5844">Also of importance in understanding the significance of differences between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VIIRS</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LLC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the degree to which these differences are distributed geographically. Specifically, shifts in major ocean currents as well as changes in forcing from one period to another could result in different structures in the submesoscale-to-mesoscale range, which would display as geographic regions of positive or negative differences between two periods.  Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.S1.F21"/> suggests that, with a few exceptions, the distribution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>2012–2015</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>2017–2020</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is, in fact, quite random; i.e., at least for this pair of 4-year periods, the differences in submesoscale-to-mesoscale structure is relatively random. There are, however, some regions of more than a few HEALPix cells which stand out as significantly different between the two periods in either the positive or negative sense. A narrow negative band is evident along the northern edge of the ACC south of the Indian Ocean, suggesting that the ACC may have shifted south between 2012–2015 and 2017–2020 – more negative values of the difference correspond to less structure in the second period.</p>
      <p id="d1e5897">Significant differences are also evident in the vicinity of the Gulf Stream and Kuroshio (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.S1.F22"/>b masked to show only HEALPix cells with values more than 2 standard deviations from the mean, i.e., significant outliers). Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.S1.F22"/>a shows the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> distribution for 2012–2015 (the geographic distribution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> for 2017–2020 is virtually indistinguishable from that shown for 2012–2015 in this plot). The dark-blue areas on the western side of the North Atlantic and North Pacific north of approximately <inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">35</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> N correspond to a significant structure in the SST fields in and north of the associated western boundary currents – the Gulf Stream and Kuroshio – an observation documented in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="text.38"/>. The region of enhanced differences between the two periods appears to be on the northern edge and to the north of these currents. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.S1.F23"/> is a blown-up image of the region in the vicinity of the Gulf Stream: Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.S1.F23"/>a shows the unmasked <inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>2012–2015</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>2017–2020</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values, and Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.S1.F23"/>b shows the masked values. The more positive differences north of the Gulf Stream mean path (magenta line in the figure) suggest an increase in structure in 2017–2020 compared with that in 2012–2015. That much of the differences are north of the northernmost extent of the Gulf Stream (upper black line) argues not only that has the mean path of the stream likely moved to the north in this period but also that this displacement resulted in more submesoscale-to-mesoscale turbulence in the region north of the stream. Of particular interest, although not the focus of this paper, is the similarity in the patterns in the vicinity of the Kuroshio, suggesting that the phenomena is hemispheric as opposed to confined to one ocean basin. The point here is that, although there are some regions of significant differences, these tend to be relatively small and are, in general, associated with strong currents – the Gulf Stream, the Kuroshio, and the ACC.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.S1.F19"><?xmltex \currentcnt{A1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure A1</label><caption><p id="d1e5973">Number of VIIRS cutouts per HEALPix cell for the period 2012–2015. HEALPix cells with fewer than five cutouts for 2012–2015 or fewer than five cutouts for 2017–2020 are shown in white. </p></caption>
        <?xmltex \hack{\hsize\textwidth}?>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=355.659449pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/16/7143/2023/gmd-16-7143-2023-f19.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.S1.F20"><?xmltex \currentcnt{A2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure A2</label><caption><p id="d1e5986">Histograms of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VIIRS</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LLC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (blue) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>2012–2015</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>2017–2020</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (light brown). Vertical black lines are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>2012–2015</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>2017–2020</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. </p></caption>
        <?xmltex \hack{\hsize\textwidth}?>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=284.527559pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/16/7143/2023/gmd-16-7143-2023-f20.png"/>

      </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?><?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.S1.F21"><?xmltex \currentcnt{A3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure A3</label><caption><p id="d1e6084"><bold>(a)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>2012–2015</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>2017–2020</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. White areas show fewer than five cutouts in the corresponding HEALPix cell in 2012–2015 and/or 2017–2020. The same color palette is used in this figure as in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/> to facilitate comparison as well as to emphasize the significant differences in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VIIRS</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LLC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. <bold>(b)</bold> Zonal mean of <bold>(a)</bold>. </p></caption>
        <?xmltex \hack{\hsize\textwidth}?>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=384.112205pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/16/7143/2023/gmd-16-7143-2023-f21.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.S1.F22"><?xmltex \currentcnt{A4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure A4</label><caption><p id="d1e6155"><bold>(a)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>2012–2015</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the Northern Hemisphere. <bold>(b)</bold> Masked <inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>2012–2015</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>2017–2020</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Dark gray: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>2012–2015</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LL</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>2017–2020</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">197</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Light gray: land. White: fewer than five cutouts per HEALPix cell for both 2012–2015 and 2017–2020. </p></caption>
        <?xmltex \hack{\hsize\textwidth}?>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=384.112205pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/16/7143/2023/gmd-16-7143-2023-f22.png"/>

      </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?><?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.S1.F23"><?xmltex \currentcnt{A5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure A5</label><caption><p id="d1e6260"><bold>(a)</bold> As in Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.S1.F21"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.S1.F22"/> but focused on the Gulf Stream region. <bold>(b)</bold> Masked version of <bold>(a)</bold>. Magenta line between approximately 75 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">45</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> W is the mean path of the Gulf Stream digitized from 2 d composites of 1 km AVHRR SST fields for 1982–1999. Black lines are for the northernmost and southernmost extents of Gulf Stream paths digitized from the same dataset as <bold>(a)</bold> but for 1982–1986. </p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=227.622047pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/16/7143/2023/gmd-16-7143-2023-f23.png"/>

      </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</app>

<?pagebreak page7167?><app id="App1.Ch1.S2">
  <?xmltex \currentcnt{B}?><label>Appendix B</label><title>Acronyms</title>
      <?pagebreak page7168?><p id="d1e6307"><table-wrap id="Taba" position="anchor"><oasis:table><oasis:tgroup cols="2">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="justify" colwidth="6cm"/>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ACC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Antarctic Circumpolar Current</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">AVHRR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ECCO</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Estimating the Circulation and Climate of the Ocean</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ECMWF</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">GHRSST</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Group for High Resolution Sea Surface Temperature</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HEALPix</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Hierarchical Equal Area isoLatitude Pixelation</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">JPL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Jet Propulsion Laboratory</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">L2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Level-2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">L2P</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Level-2P</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">LL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Log likelihood</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">LLC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Latitude–longitude–polar cap</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">LLC4320</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Latitude–longitude–polar cap 4320</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">LLC2160</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Latitude–longitude–polar cap 2160</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">LLC1080</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Latitude–longitude–polar cap 1080</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MITgcm</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MIT General Circulation Model</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MIT</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Massachusetts Institute of Technology</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MODIS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NASA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">National Aeronautics and Space Administration</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NOAA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NPP</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">National Polar-orbiting Partnership</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NSF</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">National Science Foundation</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OGCM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Ocean general circulation model</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OSCAR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Ocean Surface Current Analyses Real-time</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PAE</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Probabilistic autoencoder</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PO.DAAC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Physical Oceanography Distributed Active Archive Center</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">RAN2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Second full-mission reanalysis</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SLSTR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Sea and Land Surface Temperature Radiometer</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SST</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Sea surface temperature</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SSTa</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Sea surface temperature anomaly</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SURFO</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Summer Undergraduate Research Fellowships in Oceanography</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">URI</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">University of Rhode Island</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">VIIRS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>
        <?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?></p>
</app>
  </app-group><notes notes-type="codedataavailability"><title>Code and data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e6619">All of the data generated and analyzed in this paper are publicly available as Parquet tables and HDF5 files at Dryad (<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.7291/D1DM5F" ext-link-type="DOI">10.7291/D1DM5F</ext-link>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="altparen.39"/>). The code developed throughout the project is provided at <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8325304" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.8325304</ext-link> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="paren.40"/> or at <uri>https://github.com/AI-for-Ocean-Science/ulmo</uri> (last access: 1 November 2023).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e6640">KG performed the initial studies on which this paper is based. KG, JXP, and PC contributed to the subsequent analyses of the data. All contributed to the writing of the paper, which was led by KG. Figures were generated by KG and PC. JXP provided input on the machine learning portion of the project. PC and DM provided input related to physical oceanography. PC provided the satellite data expertise. DM provided the modeling expertise. MK and JXP processed the satellite data.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e6646">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d1e6652">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e6658">J. Xavier Prochaska acknowledges future support from the Simons Foundation and the University of California, Santa Cruz. DM carried out research at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under a contract with NASA, with support from the Physical Oceanography (PO) and Modeling, Analysis, and Prediction (MAP) programs.  Katharina Gallmeier was supported during the summer of 2021 through the Summer Undergraduate Research Fellowships in Oceanography program of the University of Rhode Island (funded by the NSF). Support for Peter Cornillon was provided by the Office of Naval Research (ONR), NASA, and the state of Rhode Island.</p><p id="d1e6660">The VIIRS L2 SST data were provided by the Group for High Resolution Sea Surface Temperature and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and obtained from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Physical Oceanography Distributed Active Archive Center. The LLC4320 SST fields were obtained via the <monospace>xmitgcm</monospace> package obtained at <uri>https://xmitgcm.readthedocs.io/en/latest/</uri> (last access: 1 November 2023).</p><p id="d1e6668">Some of the results in this paper have been derived using HEALPix <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="paren.41"/>. The authors acknowledge use of the Nautilus cloud computing system, which is supported by the US National Science Foundation (NSF). High-end computing for the LLC4320 simulation was provided by the NASA Advanced Supercomputing (NAS) Division at the Ames Research Center.</p></ack><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e6677">This research has been supported by the Office of Naval Research (grant no. N00014-17-1-2963), the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (grant nos. 80NSSC18K0837 and 80NSSC20K1728), and the National Science Foundation (grant nos. OCE-1950586, CNS-1456638, CNS-1730158, CNS-2100237, CNS-2120019, ACI-1540112, ACI-1541349, OAC-1826967, and OAC-2112167).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e6683">This paper was edited by Riccardo Farneti and reviewed by Takaya Uchida and one anonymous referee.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Arbic et~al.(2018)Arbic, Alford, Ansong, Buijsman, Ciotti, Farrar,
Hallberg, Henze, Hill, Luecke, Menemenlis, Metzger, M{\"{u}}eller, Nelson,
Nelson, Ngodock, Ponte, Richman, Savage, Scott, Shriver, Simmons, Souopgui,
Timko, Wallcraft, Zamudio, and Zhao}}?><label>Arbic et al.(2018)Arbic, Alford, Ansong, Buijsman, Ciotti, Farrar, Hallberg, Henze, Hill, Luecke, Menemenlis, Metzger, Müeller, Nelson, Nelson, Ngodock, Ponte, Richman, Savage, Scott, Shriver, Simmons, Souopgui, Timko, Wallcraft, Zamudio, and Zhao</label><?label Arbic2018?><mixed-citation>Arbic, B. K., Alford, M. H., Ansong, J. K., Buijsman, M. C., Ciotti, R. B., Farrar, J. T., Hallberg, R. W., Henze, C. E., Hill, C. N., Luecke, C. A., Menemenlis, D., Metzger, E. J., Müeller, M., Nelson, A. D., Nelson, B. C., Ngodock, H. E., Ponte, R. M., Richman, J. G., Savage, A. C., Scott, R. B., Shriver, J. F., Simmons, H. L., Souopgui, I., Timko, P. G., Wallcraft, A. J., Zamudio, L., and Zhao, Z.: A Primer on Global Internal Tide and Internal Gravity Wave Continuum Modeling in HYCOM and MITgcm, in: New Frontiers in Operational Oceanography, edited by: Chassignet, E. P., Pascual, A., Tintoré, J., and Verron, J., Chap. 13,   GODAE OceanView, 307–392, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.17125/gov2018.ch13" ext-link-type="DOI">10.17125/gov2018.ch13</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Arbic et~al.(2022)Arbic, Elipot, Brasch, Menemenlis, Ponte, Shriver,
Yu, Zaron, Alford, Buijsman, Abernathey, Garcia, Guan, Martin, and
Nelson}}?><label>Arbic et al.(2022)Arbic, Elipot, Brasch, Menemenlis, Ponte, Shriver, Yu, Zaron, Alford, Buijsman, Abernathey, Garcia, Guan, Martin, and Nelson</label><?label Arbic2022?><mixed-citation>Arbic, B. K., Elipot, S., Brasch, J. M., Menemenlis, D., Ponte, A. L., Shriver, J. F., Yu, X., Zaron, E. D., Alford, M. H., Buijsman, M. C., Abernathey, R., Garcia, D., Guan, L., Martin, P. E., and Nelson, A. D.: Near‐Surface Oceanic Kinetic Energy Distributions From Drifter Observations and Numerical Models, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 127, 1–30, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JC018551" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2022JC018551</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Bryan(1991)}}?><label>Bryan(1991)</label><?label bryan1991?><mixed-citation> Bryan, K.: Michael Cox (1941–1989): His Pioneering Contributions to Ocean Circulation, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 21, 1259–1270, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Böhm and Seljak(2020)}}?><label>Böhm and Seljak(2020)</label><?label pae?><mixed-citation>Böhm, V. and Seljak, U.: Probabilistic Auto-Encoder, ArXiv [preprint], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2006.05479" ext-link-type="DOI">10.48550/arXiv.2006.05479</ext-link>,  2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{{Cheng} and {M{\'{e}}nard}(2021)}}?><label>Cheng and Ménard(2021)</label><?label cheng2021?><mixed-citation>Cheng, S. and Ménard, B.: How to quantify fields or textures? A guide to the scattering transform, arXiv [preprint], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2112.01288" ext-link-type="DOI">10.48550/arXiv.2112.01288</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Cornillon and Menemenlis(2018)}}?><label>Cornillon and Menemenlis(2018)</label><?label cornillon-2018?><mixed-citation>Cornillon, P. and Menemenlis, D.: The Gulf Stream: Yikes, What's It Doing Down There?, in: ECCO Project Meeting 2018, Austin, Texas, USA, <uri>https://www.ecco-group.org/meetings-documents.htm?id=ecco2018</uri> (last access: 1 November 2023), 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Cox(1975)}}?><label>Cox(1975)</label><?label Cox1975?><mixed-citation> Cox, M. D.: A Baroclinic Model of the World Ocean: Preliminary Results, in: Numerical Models of the Ocean Circulation, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C., 107–118, ISBN 10 0309022258, SBN 13 9780309022255, 1975.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Dushaw and Menemenlis(2023)}}?><label>Dushaw and Menemenlis(2023)</label><?label Dushaw2023?><mixed-citation>Dushaw, B. D. and Menemenlis, D.: Resonant Diurnal Internal Tides in the North Atlantic: 2. Modeling, Geophys. Res. Lett., 50, 2189–2192, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL101193" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2022GL101193</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{Flexas et al.(2015)}?><label>Flexas et al.(2015)</label><?label Flexas2015?><mixed-citation> Flexas, M. M., Schodlok, M. P.,  Padman, L.,  Menemenlis, D., and Orsi, A. H.: Role of tides on the formation of the Antarctic Slope Front at the Weddell-Scotia Confluence J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 120, 3658–3680, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page7169?><ref id="bib1.bibx10"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Forget et~al.(2015)Forget, Campin, Heimbach, Hill, Ponte, and
Wunsch}}?><label>Forget et al.(2015)Forget, Campin, Heimbach, Hill, Ponte, and Wunsch</label><?label gmd-8-3071-2015?><mixed-citation>Forget, G., Campin, J.-M., Heimbach, P., Hill, C. N., Ponte, R. M., and Wunsch, C.: ECCO version 4: an integrated framework for non-linear inverse modeling and global ocean state estimation, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 3071–3104, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-3071-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-8-3071-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Fox-Kemper et~al.(2019)}}?><label>Fox-Kemper et al.(2019)</label><?label Fox-Kemper2019?><mixed-citation>Fox-Kemper, B., Adcroft, A., Böning, C. W., Chassignet, E. P., Curchitser, E., Danabasoglu, G., Eden, C., England, M. H., Gerdes, R., Greatbatch, R. J., Griffies, S. M., Hallberg, R. W., Hanert, E., Heimbach, P., Hewitt, H. T., Hill, C. N., Komuro, Y., Legg, S., Le Sommer, J., Masina, S., Marsland, S. J., Penny, S. G., Qiao, F., Ringler, T. D., Treguier, A. M., Tsujino, H., Uotila, P., and Yeager, S. G.: Challenges and Prospects in Ocean Circulation Models, Front. Mar. Sci., 6, 65, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00065" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/fmars.2019.00065</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{{G{\'{o}}rski} et~al.(2005){G{\'{o}}rski}, {Hivon}, {Banday}, {Wandelt},
{Hansen}, {Reinecke}, and {Bartelmann}}}?><label>Górski et al.(2005)Górski, Hivon, Banday, Wandelt, Hansen, Reinecke, and Bartelmann</label><?label healpix?><mixed-citation>Górski, K. M., Hivon, E., Banday, A. J., Wandelt, B. D., Hansen, F. K., Reinecke, M., and Bartelmann, M.: HEALPix: A Framework for High-Resolution Discretization and Fast Analysis of Data Distributed on the Sphere,   Astrophys. J., 622, 759–771, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1086/427976" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1086/427976</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Hill et~al.(2007)Hill, Menemenlis, Ciotti, and
Henze}}?><label>Hill et al.(2007)Hill, Menemenlis, Ciotti, and Henze</label><?label hill2007investigating?><mixed-citation> Hill, C., Menemenlis, D., Ciotti, B., and Henze, C.: Investigating solution convergence in a global ocean model using a 2048-processor cluster of distributed shared memory machines, Sci. Programm., 15, 107–115, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Jonasson and Ignatov(2019)}}?><label>Jonasson and Ignatov(2019)</label><?label jonasson?><mixed-citation>Jonasson, O. and Ignatov, A.: Status of second VIIRS reanalysis (RAN2), in: Ocean Sensing and Monitoring XI, edited by: Hou, W. W. and Arnone, R. A., International Society for Optics and Photonics, SPIE, Vol. 11014, p. 110140O, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2518908" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1117/12.2518908</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Jonasson et~al.(2022)Jonasson, Ignatov, Pryamitsyn, Petrenko, and
Kihai}}?><label>Jonasson et al.(2022)Jonasson, Ignatov, Pryamitsyn, Petrenko, and Kihai</label><?label rs14143476?><mixed-citation>Jonasson, O., Ignatov, A., Pryamitsyn, V., Petrenko, B., and Kihai, Y.: JPSS VIIRS SST Reanalysis Version 3, Remote Sens., 14,   3476, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14143476" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/rs14143476</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Lee(1996)}}?><label>Lee(1996)</label><?label Lee1996a?><mixed-citation> Lee, T.: Propagation of Gulf Stream Meanders between 74 and 70 W, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 26, 205–224, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Leroux et~al.(2022)Leroux, Brankart1, Albert1, Brodeau, Molines,
Jamet, Le~Sommer, Penduff, and Brasseur}}?><label>Leroux et al.(2022)Leroux, Brankart1, Albert1, Brodeau, Molines, Jamet, Le Sommer, Penduff, and Brasseur</label><?label leroux2022?><mixed-citation>Leroux, S., Brankart, J.-M., Albert, A., Brodeau, L., Molines, J.-M., Jamet, Q., Le Sommer, J., Penduff, T., and Brasseur, P.: Ensemble quantification of short-term predictability of the ocean dynamics at a kilometric-scale resolution: a Western Mediterranean test case, Ocean Sci., 18, 1619–1644, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/os-18-1619-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/os-18-1619-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Light et~al.(2022)Light, Arbic, Martin, Brodeau, Farrar, Griffies,
Kirtman, Laurindo, Menemenlis, Molod, Nelson, Nyadjro, O'Rourke, Shriver,
Siqueira, Small, and Strobach}}?><label>Light et al.(2022)Light, Arbic, Martin, Brodeau, Farrar, Griffies, Kirtman, Laurindo, Menemenlis, Molod, Nelson, Nyadjro, O'Rourke, Shriver, Siqueira, Small, and Strobach</label><?label Light2022?><mixed-citation>Light, C. X., Arbic, B. K., Martin, P. E., Brodeau, L., Farrar, J. T., Griffies, S. M., Kirtman, B. P., Laurindo, L. C., Menemenlis, D., Molod, A., Nelson, A. D., Nyadjro, E., O'Rourke, A. K., Shriver, J. F., Siqueira, L., Small, R. J., and Strobach, E.: Effects of grid spacing on high-frequency precipitation variance in coupled high-resolution global ocean–atmosphere models, Clim. Dynam., 59, 2887–2913, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-022-06257-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00382-022-06257-6</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Mallat(2012)}}?><label>Mallat(2012)</label><?label mallat2012?><mixed-citation>Mallat, S.: Group Invariant Scattering, Commun. Pure Appl. Math., 65, 1331–1398, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/cpa.21413" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/cpa.21413</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Marshall et~al.(1997)Marshall, Adcroft, Hill, Perelman, and
Heisey}}?><label>Marshall et al.(1997)Marshall, Adcroft, Hill, Perelman, and Heisey</label><?label marshall?><mixed-citation>Marshall, J., Adcroft, A., Hill, C., Perelman, L., and Heisey, C.: A finite-volume, incompressible Navier Stokes model for studies of the ocean on parallel computers, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 102, 5753–5766, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/96JC02775" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/96JC02775</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Menemenlis et~al.(2008)Menemenlis, Campin, Heimbach, Hill, Lee,
Nguyen, Schodlok, and Zhang}}?><label>Menemenlis et al.(2008)Menemenlis, Campin, Heimbach, Hill, Lee, Nguyen, Schodlok, and Zhang</label><?label Menemenlis2008?><mixed-citation> Menemenlis, D., Campin, J.-M., Heimbach, P., Hill, C. N., Lee, T., Nguyen, A. T., Schodlok, M. P., and Zhang, H.: ECCO2: High resolution global ocean and sea ice data synthesis, Mercator Ocean Quarterly Newsletter, 31, 13–21, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{NOAA Satellite Applications and Research(2021)}?><label>NOAA Satellite Applications and Research(2021)</label><?label STAR?><mixed-citation>NOAA Satellite Applications and Research (STAR), GHRSST Level 2P NOAA STAR SST v2.80 from VIIRS on S-NPP Satellite, PO.DAAC [data set],  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5067/GHVRS-2PO28" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5067/GHVRS-2PO28</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Papamakarios et~al.(2019)Papamakarios, Nalisnick, Rezende, Mohamed,
and Lakshminarayanan}}?><label>Papamakarios et al.(2019)Papamakarios, Nalisnick, Rezende, Mohamed, and Lakshminarayanan</label><?label Papamakarios?><mixed-citation>Papamakarios, G., Nalisnick, E., Rezende, D. J., Mohamed, S., and Lakshminarayanan, B.: Normalizing Flows for Probabilistic Modeling and Inference, ArXiv [preprint], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.1912.02762" ext-link-type="DOI">10.48550/ARXIV.1912.02762</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Prochaska et~al.(2021)Prochaska, Cornillon, and
Reiman}}?><label>Prochaska et al.(2021)Prochaska, Cornillon, and Reiman</label><?label prochaska2021deep?><mixed-citation>Prochaska, J. X., Cornillon, P. C., and Reiman, D. M.: Deep Learning of Sea Surface Temperature Patterns to Identify Ocean Extremes, Remote Sens., 13, 744, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13040744" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/rs13040744</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{Prochaska et al.(2023a)}?><label>Prochaska et al.(2023a)</label><?label data?><mixed-citation>Prochaska, J. X., Gallmeier, K., Cornillon, P., Menemenlis, D., and Kelm, M.: VIIRS data and Ulmo model for comparison to the LLC4320 ECCO ocean general circulation model, Dryad  [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.7291/D1DM5F" ext-link-type="DOI">10.7291/D1DM5F</ext-link>, 2023a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Prochaska et~al.(2023b)Prochaska, Guo, aagabin, BenPritikin, mskelm,
Cornillon, Reiman, and vgotov2}}?><label>Prochaska et al.(2023b)Prochaska, Guo, aagabin, BenPritikin, mskelm, Cornillon, Reiman, and vgotov2</label><?label j_xavier_prochaska_2023_8325304?><mixed-citation>Prochaska, J. X., Guo, E., aagabin, BenPritikin, mskelm, Cornillon, P., Reiman, D., and vgotov2: AI-for-Ocean-Science/ulmo: Updates for Gallmeier in press, Zenodo [code], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8325304" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.8325304</ext-link>, 2023b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Rocha et~al.(2016{\natexlab{a}})Rocha, Chereskin, Gille, and
Menemenlis}}?><label>Rocha et al.(2016a)Rocha, Chereskin, Gille, and Menemenlis</label><?label Rocha2016a?><mixed-citation>Rocha, C. B., Chereskin, T. K., Gille, S. T., and Menemenlis, D.: Mesoscale to Submesoscale Wavenumber Spectra in Drake Passage, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 46, 601–620, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-15-0087.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JPO-D-15-0087.1</ext-link>, 2016a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Rocha et~al.(2016{\natexlab{b}})Rocha, Gille, Chereskin, and
Menemenlis}}?><label>Rocha et al.(2016b)Rocha, Gille, Chereskin, and Menemenlis</label><?label Rocha2016b?><mixed-citation>Rocha, C. B., Gille, S. T., Chereskin, T. K., and Menemenlis, D.: Seasonality of submesoscale dynamics in the Kuroshio Extension, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 11304–11311, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL071349" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016GL071349</ext-link>, 2016b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Shridhar et~al.(2019)Shridhar, Laumann, and Liwicki}}?><label>Shridhar et al.(2019)Shridhar, Laumann, and Liwicki</label><?label bayes_NN?><mixed-citation>Shridhar, K., Laumann, F., and Liwicki, M.: A Comprehensive guide to Bayesian Convolutional Neural Network with Variational Inference, ArXiv [preprint], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.1901.02731" ext-link-type="DOI">10.48550/ARXIV.1901.02731</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Su et~al.(2018)Su, Wang, Klein, Thompson, and Menemenlis}}?><label>Su et al.(2018)Su, Wang, Klein, Thompson, and Menemenlis</label><?label Su2018?><mixed-citation>Su, Z., Wang, J., Klein, P., Thompson, A. F., and Menemenlis, D.: Ocean submesoscales as a key component of the global heat budget, Nat. Commun., 9, 1–8, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-02983-w" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-018-02983-w</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Torres et~al.(2022)Torres, Klein, Wang, Wineteer, Qiu, Thompson,
Renault, Rodriguez, Menemenlis, Molod, Hill, Strobach, Zhang, Flexas, and
Perkovic-Martin}}?><label>Torres et al.(2022)Torres, Klein, Wang, Wineteer, Qiu, Thompson, Renault, Rodriguez, Menemenlis, Molod, Hill, Strobach, Zhang, Flexas, and Perkovic-Martin</label><?label Torres2022?><mixed-citation>Torres, H. S., Klein, P., Wang, J., Wineteer, A., Qiu, B., Thompson, A. F., Renault, L., Rodriguez, E., Menemenlis, D., Molod, A., Hill, C. N., Strobach, E., Zhang, H., Flexas, M., and Perkovic-Martin, D.: Wind work at the air-sea interface: a modeling study in anticipation of future space missions, Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 8041–8058, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8041-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-15-8041-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Uchida et~al.(2022)Uchida, {Le Sommer}, Stern, Abernathey, Holdgraf,
Albert, Brodeau, Chassignet, Xu, Gula, Roullet, Koldunov, Danilov, Wang,
Menemenlis, Bricaud, Arbic, Shriver, Qiao, Xiao, Biastoch, Schubert,
Fox-Kemper, Dewar, and Wallcraft}}?><label>Uchida et al.(2022)Uchida, Le Sommer, Stern, Abernathey, Holdgraf, Albert, Brodeau, Chassignet, Xu, Gula, Roullet, Koldunov, Danilov, Wang, Menemenlis, Bricaud, Arbic, Shriver, Qiao, Xiao, Biastoch, Schubert, Fox-Kemper, Dewar, and Wallcraft</label><?label Uchida2022?><mixed-citation>Uchida, T., Le Sommer, J., Stern, C., Abernathey, R. P., Holdgraf, C., Albert, A., Brodeau, L., Chassignet, E. P., Xu, X., Gula, J., Roullet, G., Koldunov, N., Danilov, S., Wang, Q., Menemenlis, D., Bricaud, C., Arbic, B. K., Shriver, J. F., Qiao, F., Xiao, B., Biastoch, A., Schubert, R., Fox-Kemper, B., Dewar, W. K., and Wallcraft, A.: Cloud-based framework for inter-comparing submesoscale-permitting realistic ocean models, Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 5829–5856, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5829-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-15-5829-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{van~der Walt et~al.(2014)van~der Walt, {S}ch\"{o}nberger,
{Nunez-Iglesias}, {B}oulogne, {W}arner, {Y}ager, {G}ouillart, {Y}u, and the
scikit-image contributors}}?><label>van der Walt et al.(2014)van der Walt, Schönberger, Nunez-Iglesias, Boulogne, Warner, Yager, Gouillart, Yu, and the scikit-image contributors</label><?label scikit-image?><mixed-citation>van der Walt, S., Schönberger, J. L., Nunez-Iglesias, J., Boulogne, F., Warner, J. D., Yager, N., Gouillart, E., Yu, T., and the scikit-image contributors: scikit-image: image processing in Python, PeerJ, 2, e453, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.453" ext-link-type="DOI">10.7717/peerj.453</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Wu et~al.(2017)Wu, Cornillon, Boussidi, and Guan}}?><label>Wu et al.(2017)Wu, Cornillon, Boussidi, and Guan</label><?label rs9090877?><mixed-citation>Wu, F., Cornillon, P., Boussidi, B., and Guan, L.: Determining the Pixel-to-Pixel Uncertainty in Satellite-Derived SST Fields, Remote Sens., 9,  877, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9090877" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/rs9090877</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Xu et~al.(2013)Xu, Rignot, Fenty, Menemenlis, and
Flexas}}?><label>Xu et al.(2013)Xu, Rignot, Fenty, Menemenlis, and Flexas</label><?label Xu2013?><mixed-citation>Xu, Y., Rignot, E., Fenty, I., Menemenlis, D., and Flexas, M. M.: Subaqueous melting of Store Glacier, west Greenland from three-dimensional, high-resolution numerical modeling and ocean observations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 4648–4653, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50825" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/grl.50825</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page7170?><ref id="bib1.bibx36"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Yu et~al.(2019)Yu, Ponte, Elipot, Menemenlis, Zaron, and
Abernathey}}?><label>Yu et al.(2019)Yu, Ponte, Elipot, Menemenlis, Zaron, and Abernathey</label><?label Yu2019?><mixed-citation>Yu, X., Ponte, A. L., Elipot, S., Menemenlis, D., Zaron, E. D., and Abernathey, R.: Surface Kinetic Energy Distributions in the Global Oceans From a High‐Resolution Numerical Model and Surface Drifter Observations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 9757–9766, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL083074" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019GL083074</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>An evaluation of the LLC4320 global-ocean simulation based on the submesoscale structure of modeled sea surface temperature fields</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Arbic et al.(2018)Arbic, Alford, Ansong, Buijsman, Ciotti, Farrar,
Hallberg, Henze, Hill, Luecke, Menemenlis, Metzger, Müeller, Nelson,
Nelson, Ngodock, Ponte, Richman, Savage, Scott, Shriver, Simmons, Souopgui,
Timko, Wallcraft, Zamudio, and Zhao</label><mixed-citation>
      
Arbic, B. K., Alford, M. H., Ansong, J. K., Buijsman, M. C., Ciotti, R. B.,
Farrar, J. T., Hallberg, R. W., Henze, C. E., Hill, C. N., Luecke, C. A.,
Menemenlis, D., Metzger, E. J., Müeller, M., Nelson, A. D., Nelson,
B. C., Ngodock, H. E., Ponte, R. M., Richman, J. G., Savage, A. C., Scott,
R. B., Shriver, J. F., Simmons, H. L., Souopgui, I., Timko, P. G., Wallcraft,
A. J., Zamudio, L., and Zhao, Z.: A Primer on Global Internal Tide and
Internal Gravity Wave Continuum Modeling in HYCOM and MITgcm, in: New
Frontiers in Operational Oceanography, edited by: Chassignet, E. P., Pascual,
A., Tintoré, J., and Verron, J., Chap. 13,   GODAE
OceanView, 307–392, <a href="https://doi.org/10.17125/gov2018.ch13" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.17125/gov2018.ch13</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Arbic et al.(2022)Arbic, Elipot, Brasch, Menemenlis, Ponte, Shriver,
Yu, Zaron, Alford, Buijsman, Abernathey, Garcia, Guan, Martin, and
Nelson</label><mixed-citation>
      
Arbic, B. K., Elipot, S., Brasch, J. M., Menemenlis, D., Ponte, A. L., Shriver,
J. F., Yu, X., Zaron, E. D., Alford, M. H., Buijsman, M. C., Abernathey, R.,
Garcia, D., Guan, L., Martin, P. E., and Nelson, A. D.: Near‐Surface
Oceanic Kinetic Energy Distributions From Drifter Observations and Numerical
Models, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 127, 1–30,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JC018551" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JC018551</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Bryan(1991)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bryan, K.: Michael Cox (1941–1989): His Pioneering Contributions to Ocean
Circulation, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 21, 1259–1270, 1991.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Böhm and Seljak(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Böhm, V. and Seljak, U.: Probabilistic Auto-Encoder, ArXiv [preprint], <a href="https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2006.05479" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2006.05479</a>,  2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Cheng and Ménard(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cheng, S. and Ménard, B.: How to quantify fields or textures? A guide
to the scattering transform, arXiv [preprint],
<a href="https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2112.01288" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2112.01288</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Cornillon and Menemenlis(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cornillon, P. and Menemenlis, D.: The Gulf Stream: Yikes, What's It Doing Down
There?, in: ECCO Project Meeting 2018, Austin, Texas, USA,
<a href="https://www.ecco-group.org/meetings-documents.htm?id=ecco2018" target="_blank"/> (last access: 1 November 2023),
2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Cox(1975)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cox, M. D.: A Baroclinic Model of the World Ocean: Preliminary Results, in:
Numerical Models of the Ocean Circulation, National Academy of
Sciences, Washington, D.C., 107–118, ISBN 10 0309022258, SBN 13 9780309022255, 1975.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Dushaw and Menemenlis(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dushaw, B. D. and Menemenlis, D.: Resonant Diurnal Internal Tides in the North
Atlantic: 2. Modeling, Geophys. Res. Lett., 50, 2189–2192,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL101193" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL101193</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Flexas et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Flexas, M. M., Schodlok, M. P.,  Padman, L.,  Menemenlis, D., and Orsi, A. H.: Role of tides on the formation of the Antarctic Slope Front at the Weddell-Scotia Confluence
J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans,
120,
3658–3680,
2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Forget et al.(2015)Forget, Campin, Heimbach, Hill, Ponte, and
Wunsch</label><mixed-citation>
      
Forget, G., Campin, J.-M., Heimbach, P., Hill, C. N., Ponte, R. M., and Wunsch, C.: ECCO version 4: an integrated framework for non-linear inverse modeling and global ocean state estimation, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 3071–3104, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-3071-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-3071-2015</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Fox-Kemper et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fox-Kemper, B., Adcroft, A., Böning, C. W., Chassignet, E. P., Curchitser, E.,
Danabasoglu, G., Eden, C., England, M. H., Gerdes, R., Greatbatch, R. J.,
Griffies, S. M., Hallberg, R. W., Hanert, E., Heimbach, P., Hewitt, H. T.,
Hill, C. N., Komuro, Y., Legg, S., Le Sommer, J., Masina, S., Marsland,
S. J., Penny, S. G., Qiao, F., Ringler, T. D., Treguier, A. M., Tsujino, H.,
Uotila, P., and Yeager, S. G.: Challenges and Prospects in Ocean Circulation
Models, Front. Mar. Sci., 6, 65, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00065" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00065</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Górski et al.(2005)Górski, Hivon, Banday, Wandelt,
Hansen, Reinecke, and Bartelmann</label><mixed-citation>
      
Górski, K. M., Hivon, E., Banday, A. J., Wandelt, B. D., Hansen,
F. K., Reinecke, M., and Bartelmann, M.: HEALPix: A Framework for
High-Resolution Discretization and Fast Analysis of Data Distributed on the
Sphere,   Astrophys. J., 622, 759–771, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1086/427976" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1086/427976</a>,
2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Hill et al.(2007)Hill, Menemenlis, Ciotti, and
Henze</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hill, C., Menemenlis, D., Ciotti, B., and Henze, C.: Investigating solution
convergence in a global ocean model using a 2048-processor cluster of
distributed shared memory machines, Sci. Programm., 15, 107–115,
2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Jonasson and Ignatov(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jonasson, O. and Ignatov, A.: Status of second VIIRS reanalysis (RAN2), in:
Ocean Sensing and Monitoring XI, edited by: Hou, W. W. and Arnone, R. A., International Society for Optics and Photonics, SPIE, Vol.
11014, p. 110140O,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2518908" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2518908</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Jonasson et al.(2022)Jonasson, Ignatov, Pryamitsyn, Petrenko, and
Kihai</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jonasson, O., Ignatov, A., Pryamitsyn, V., Petrenko, B., and Kihai, Y.: JPSS
VIIRS SST Reanalysis Version 3, Remote Sens., 14,   3476, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14143476" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14143476</a>,
2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Lee(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lee, T.: Propagation of Gulf Stream Meanders between 74 and 70 W, J.
Phys. Oceanogr., 26, 205–224, 1996.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Leroux et al.(2022)Leroux, Brankart1, Albert1, Brodeau, Molines,
Jamet, Le Sommer, Penduff, and Brasseur</label><mixed-citation>
      
Leroux, S., Brankart, J.-M., Albert, A., Brodeau, L., Molines, J.-M., Jamet, Q., Le Sommer, J., Penduff, T., and Brasseur, P.: Ensemble quantification of short-term predictability of the ocean dynamics at a kilometric-scale resolution: a Western Mediterranean test case, Ocean Sci., 18, 1619–1644, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/os-18-1619-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/os-18-1619-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Light et al.(2022)Light, Arbic, Martin, Brodeau, Farrar, Griffies,
Kirtman, Laurindo, Menemenlis, Molod, Nelson, Nyadjro, O'Rourke, Shriver,
Siqueira, Small, and Strobach</label><mixed-citation>
      
Light, C. X., Arbic, B. K., Martin, P. E., Brodeau, L., Farrar, J. T.,
Griffies, S. M., Kirtman, B. P., Laurindo, L. C., Menemenlis, D., Molod, A.,
Nelson, A. D., Nyadjro, E., O'Rourke, A. K., Shriver, J. F., Siqueira, L.,
Small, R. J., and Strobach, E.: Effects of grid spacing on high-frequency
precipitation variance in coupled high-resolution global ocean–atmosphere
models, Clim. Dynam., 59, 2887–2913, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-022-06257-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-022-06257-6</a>,
2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Mallat(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mallat, S.: Group Invariant Scattering, Commun. Pure Appl.
Math., 65, 1331–1398, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/cpa.21413" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/cpa.21413</a>,
2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Marshall et al.(1997)Marshall, Adcroft, Hill, Perelman, and
Heisey</label><mixed-citation>
      
Marshall, J., Adcroft, A., Hill, C., Perelman, L., and Heisey, C.: A
finite-volume, incompressible Navier Stokes model for studies of the ocean on
parallel computers, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 102, 5753–5766,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/96JC02775" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/96JC02775</a>,
1997.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Menemenlis et al.(2008)Menemenlis, Campin, Heimbach, Hill, Lee,
Nguyen, Schodlok, and Zhang</label><mixed-citation>
      
Menemenlis, D., Campin, J.-M., Heimbach, P., Hill, C. N., Lee, T., Nguyen,
A. T., Schodlok, M. P., and Zhang, H.: ECCO2: High resolution global ocean
and sea ice data synthesis, Mercator Ocean Quarterly Newsletter, 31, 13–21,
2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>NOAA Satellite Applications and Research(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
      
NOAA Satellite Applications and Research (STAR), GHRSST Level 2P NOAA STAR SST v2.80 from VIIRS on S-NPP Satellite, PO.DAAC [data set],  <a href="https://doi.org/10.5067/GHVRS-2PO28" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5067/GHVRS-2PO28</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Papamakarios et al.(2019)Papamakarios, Nalisnick, Rezende, Mohamed,
and Lakshminarayanan</label><mixed-citation>
      
Papamakarios, G., Nalisnick, E., Rezende, D. J., Mohamed, S., and
Lakshminarayanan, B.: Normalizing Flows for Probabilistic Modeling and
Inference, ArXiv [preprint], <a href="https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.1912.02762" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.1912.02762</a>,
2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Prochaska et al.(2021)Prochaska, Cornillon, and
Reiman</label><mixed-citation>
      
Prochaska, J. X., Cornillon, P. C., and Reiman, D. M.: Deep Learning of Sea
Surface Temperature Patterns to Identify Ocean Extremes, Remote Sens., 13,
744, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13040744" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13040744</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Prochaska et al.(2023a)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Prochaska, J. X., Gallmeier, K., Cornillon, P., Menemenlis, D., and Kelm, M.: VIIRS data and Ulmo model for comparison to the LLC4320 ECCO ocean general circulation model, Dryad  [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.7291/D1DM5F" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.7291/D1DM5F</a>, 2023a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Prochaska et al.(2023b)Prochaska, Guo, aagabin, BenPritikin, mskelm,
Cornillon, Reiman, and vgotov2</label><mixed-citation>
      
Prochaska, J. X., Guo, E., aagabin, BenPritikin, mskelm, Cornillon, P., Reiman,
D., and vgotov2: AI-for-Ocean-Science/ulmo: Updates for Gallmeier in press, Zenodo [code],
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8325304" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8325304</a>,
2023b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Rocha et al.(2016a)Rocha, Chereskin, Gille, and
Menemenlis</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rocha, C. B., Chereskin, T. K., Gille, S. T., and Menemenlis, D.: Mesoscale to
Submesoscale Wavenumber Spectra in Drake Passage, J. Phys.
Oceanogr., 46, 601–620, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-15-0087.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-15-0087.1</a>,
2016a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Rocha et al.(2016b)Rocha, Gille, Chereskin, and
Menemenlis</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rocha, C. B., Gille, S. T., Chereskin, T. K., and Menemenlis, D.: Seasonality
of submesoscale dynamics in the Kuroshio Extension, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 43, 11304–11311, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL071349" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL071349</a>,
2016b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Shridhar et al.(2019)Shridhar, Laumann, and Liwicki</label><mixed-citation>
      
Shridhar, K., Laumann, F., and Liwicki, M.: A Comprehensive guide to Bayesian
Convolutional Neural Network with Variational Inference,
ArXiv [preprint], <a href="https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.1901.02731" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.1901.02731</a>,
2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Su et al.(2018)Su, Wang, Klein, Thompson, and Menemenlis</label><mixed-citation>
      
Su, Z., Wang, J., Klein, P., Thompson, A. F., and Menemenlis, D.: Ocean
submesoscales as a key component of the global heat budget, Nat.
Commun., 9, 1–8, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-02983-w" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-02983-w</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Torres et al.(2022)Torres, Klein, Wang, Wineteer, Qiu, Thompson,
Renault, Rodriguez, Menemenlis, Molod, Hill, Strobach, Zhang, Flexas, and
Perkovic-Martin</label><mixed-citation>
      
Torres, H. S., Klein, P., Wang, J., Wineteer, A., Qiu, B., Thompson, A. F., Renault, L., Rodriguez, E., Menemenlis, D., Molod, A., Hill, C. N., Strobach, E., Zhang, H., Flexas, M., and Perkovic-Martin, D.: Wind work at the air-sea interface: a modeling study in anticipation of future space missions, Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 8041–8058, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8041-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8041-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Uchida et al.(2022)Uchida, Le Sommer, Stern, Abernathey, Holdgraf,
Albert, Brodeau, Chassignet, Xu, Gula, Roullet, Koldunov, Danilov, Wang,
Menemenlis, Bricaud, Arbic, Shriver, Qiao, Xiao, Biastoch, Schubert,
Fox-Kemper, Dewar, and Wallcraft</label><mixed-citation>
      
Uchida, T., Le Sommer, J., Stern, C., Abernathey, R. P., Holdgraf, C., Albert, A., Brodeau, L., Chassignet, E. P., Xu, X., Gula, J., Roullet, G., Koldunov, N., Danilov, S., Wang, Q., Menemenlis, D., Bricaud, C., Arbic, B. K., Shriver, J. F., Qiao, F., Xiao, B., Biastoch, A., Schubert, R., Fox-Kemper, B., Dewar, W. K., and Wallcraft, A.: Cloud-based framework for inter-comparing submesoscale-permitting realistic ocean models, Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 5829–5856, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5829-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5829-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>van der Walt et al.(2014)van der Walt, Schönberger,
Nunez-Iglesias, Boulogne, Warner, Yager, Gouillart, Yu, and the
scikit-image contributors</label><mixed-citation>
      
van der Walt, S., Schönberger, J. L., Nunez-Iglesias, J., Boulogne, F.,
Warner, J. D., Yager, N., Gouillart, E., Yu, T., and the scikit-image
contributors: scikit-image: image processing in Python, PeerJ, 2, e453,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.453" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.453</a>,
2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Wu et al.(2017)Wu, Cornillon, Boussidi, and Guan</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wu, F., Cornillon, P., Boussidi, B., and Guan, L.: Determining the
Pixel-to-Pixel Uncertainty in Satellite-Derived SST Fields, Remote Sens.,
9,  877, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9090877" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9090877</a>,
2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Xu et al.(2013)Xu, Rignot, Fenty, Menemenlis, and
Flexas</label><mixed-citation>
      
Xu, Y., Rignot, E., Fenty, I., Menemenlis, D., and Flexas, M. M.: Subaqueous
melting of Store Glacier, west Greenland from three-dimensional,
high-resolution numerical modeling and ocean observations, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 40, 4648–4653, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50825" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50825</a>,
2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Yu et al.(2019)Yu, Ponte, Elipot, Menemenlis, Zaron, and
Abernathey</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yu, X., Ponte, A. L., Elipot, S., Menemenlis, D., Zaron, E. D., and Abernathey,
R.: Surface Kinetic Energy Distributions in the Global Oceans From a
High‐Resolution Numerical Model and Surface Drifter Observations,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 9757–9766, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL083074" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL083074</a>,
2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
