Articles | Volume 16, issue 12
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3611-2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3611-2023
Development and technical paper
 | 
30 Jun 2023
Development and technical paper |  | 30 Jun 2023

Convective-gust nowcasting based on radar reflectivity and a deep learning algorithm

Haixia Xiao, Yaqiang Wang, Yu Zheng, Yuanyuan Zheng, Xiaoran Zhuang, Hongyan Wang, and Mei Gao

Related authors

Compressing high-resolution data through latent representation encoding for downscaling large-scale AI weather forecast model
Qian Liu, Bing Gong, Xiaoran Zhuang, Xiaohui Zhong, Zhiming Kang, and Hao Li
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3183,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3183, 2024
Short summary
AI-NAOS: An AI-Based Nonspherical Aerosol Optical Scheme for Chemical Weather Model GRAPES_Meso5.1/CUACE
Xuan Wang, Lei Bi, Hong Wang, Yaqiang Wang, Wei Han, Xueshun Shen, and Xiaoye Zhang
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-51,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-51, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
Comprehensive evaluation of typical planetary boundary layer (PBL) parameterization schemes in China – Part 2: Influence of uncertainty factors
Wenxing Jia, Xiaoye Zhang, Hong Wang, Yaqiang Wang, Deying Wang, Junting Zhong, Wenjie Zhang, Lei Zhang, Lifeng Guo, Yadong Lei, Jizhi Wang, Yuanqin Yang, and Yi Lin
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 6833–6856, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6833-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6833-2023, 2023
Short summary
Comprehensive evaluation of typical planetary boundary layer (PBL) parameterization schemes in China – Part 1: Understanding expressiveness of schemes for different regions from the mechanism perspective
Wenxing Jia, Xiaoye Zhang, Hong Wang, Yaqiang Wang, Deying Wang, Junting Zhong, Wenjie Zhang, Lei Zhang, Lifeng Guo, Yadong Lei, Jizhi Wang, Yuanqin Yang, and Yi Lin
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 6635–6670, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6635-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6635-2023, 2023
Short summary
Implementation and application of ensemble optimal interpolation on an operational chemistry weather model for improving PM2.5 and visibility predictions
Siting Li, Ping Wang, Hong Wang, Yue Peng, Zhaodong Liu, Wenjie Zhang, Hongli Liu, Yaqiang Wang, Huizheng Che, and Xiaoye Zhang
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 4171–4191, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4171-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4171-2023, 2023
Short summary

Related subject area

Atmospheric sciences
Modeling of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from global to regional scales: model development (IAP-AACM_PAH v1.0) and investigation of health risks in 2013 and 2018 in China
Zichen Wu, Xueshun Chen, Zifa Wang, Huansheng Chen, Zhe Wang, Qing Mu, Lin Wu, Wending Wang, Xiao Tang, Jie Li, Ying Li, Qizhong Wu, Yang Wang, Zhiyin Zou, and Zijian Jiang
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8885–8907, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8885-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8885-2024, 2024
Short summary
LIMA (v2.0): A full two-moment cloud microphysical scheme for the mesoscale non-hydrostatic model Meso-NH v5-6
Marie Taufour, Jean-Pierre Pinty, Christelle Barthe, Benoît Vié, and Chien Wang
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8773–8798, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8773-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8773-2024, 2024
Short summary
SLUCM+BEM (v1.0): a simple parameterisation for dynamic anthropogenic heat and electricity consumption in WRF-Urban (v4.3.2)
Yuya Takane, Yukihiro Kikegawa, Ko Nakajima, and Hiroyuki Kusaka
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8639–8664, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8639-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8639-2024, 2024
Short summary
NAQPMS-PDAF v2.0: a novel hybrid nonlinear data assimilation system for improved simulation of PM2.5 chemical components
Hongyi Li, Ting Yang, Lars Nerger, Dawei Zhang, Di Zhang, Guigang Tang, Haibo Wang, Yele Sun, Pingqing Fu, Hang Su, and Zifa Wang
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8495–8519, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8495-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8495-2024, 2024
Short summary
Source-specific bias correction of US background and anthropogenic ozone modeled in CMAQ
T. Nash Skipper, Christian Hogrefe, Barron H. Henderson, Rohit Mathur, Kristen M. Foley, and Armistead G. Russell
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8373–8397, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8373-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8373-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Chaudhuri, S. and Middey, A.: Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system to forecast peak gust speed during thunderstorms, Meteorol. Atmos. Phys., 114, 139–149, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-011-0158-4, 2011. a
Danandeh Mehr, A., Rikhtehgar Ghiasi, A., Yaseen, Z. M., Sorman, A. U., and Abualigah, L.: A novel intelligent deep learning predictive model for meteorological drought forecasting, J. Amb. Intel. Hum. Comp., 1–15, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-022-03701-7, 2022. a
Doswell, C. A. (Ed.): Severe convective storms – An overview, in: Severe convective storms, American Meteorological Society, Boston, MA, 1–26, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-935704-06-5_1, 2001. a
Doswell, C. A., Brooks, H. E., and Maddox, R. A.: Flash Flood Forecasting: An Ingredients-Based Methodology, Weather Forecast., 11, 560–581, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(1996)01160;0560:fffaib62;2.0.co;2, 1996. a
Duan, M., Xia, J., Yan, Z., Han, L., Zhang, L., Xia, H., and Yu, S.: Reconstruction of the Radar Reflectivity of Convective Storms Based on Deep Learning and Himawari-8 Observations, Remote Sensing, 13, 3330, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13163330, 2021. a
Download
Short summary
Due to the small-scale and nonstationary nature of convective wind gusts (CGs), reliable CG nowcasting has remained unattainable. Here, we developed a deep learning model — namely CGsNet — for 0—2 h of quantitative CG nowcasting, first achieving minute—kilometer-level forecasts. Based on the CGsNet model, the average surface wind speed (ASWS) and peak wind gust speed (PWGS) predictions are obtained. Experiments indicate that CGsNet exhibits higher accuracy than the traditional method.