Articles | Volume 14, issue 12
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7605-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7605-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Development and technical paper
| 
16 Dec 2021
Development and technical paper |
| 16 Dec 2021
| 16 Dec 2021
Application of CCM SOCOL-AERv2-BE to cosmogenic beryllium isotopes: description and validation for polar regions
Kseniia Golubenko
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Space Physics and Astronomy Research Unit, University of Oulu, 90570, Finland
Eugene Rozanov
Physikalisch-Meteorologisches Observatorium Davos and World Radiation Center, Davos Dorf, 7260, Switzerland
Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH Zurich, Zurich, 8092, Switzerland
St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, 198504, Russia
Gennady Kovaltsov
Ioffe Physical–Technical Institute, St. Petersburg, 194021, Russia
Ari-Pekka Leppänen
Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority – STUK, Rovaniemi, 96400, Finland
Timofei Sukhodolov
Physikalisch-Meteorologisches Observatorium Davos and World Radiation Center, Davos Dorf, 7260, Switzerland
St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, 198504, Russia
Institute of Meteorology and Climatology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, 1180, Austria
Ilya Usoskin
Space Physics and Astronomy Research Unit, University of Oulu, 90570, Finland
Sodankylä Geophysical Observatory, University of Oulu, Sodankylä, 99600, Finland
Related authors
No articles found.
Yunqian Zhu, Hideharu Akiyoshi, Valentina Aquila, Elizabeth Asher, Ewa M. Bednarz, Slimane Bekki, Christoph Brühl, Amy H. Butler, Parker Case, Simon Chabrillat, Gabriel Chiodo, Margot Clyne, Peter R. Colarco, Sandip Dhomse, Lola Falletti, Eric Fleming, Ben Johnson, Andrin Jörimann, Mahesh Kovilakam, Gerbrand Koren, Ales Kuchar, Nicolas Lebas, Qing Liang, Cheng-Cheng Liu, Graham Mann, Michael Manyin, Marion Marchand, Olaf Morgenstern, Paul Newman, Luke D. Oman, Freja F. Østerstrøm, Yifeng Peng, David Plummer, Ilaria Quaglia, William Randel, Samuel Rémy, Takashi Sekiya, Stephen Steenrod, Timofei Sukhodolov, Simone Tilmes, Kostas Tsigaridis, Rei Ueyama, Daniele Visioni, Xinyue Wang, Shingo Watanabe, Yousuke Yamashita, Pengfei Yu, Wandi Yu, Jun Zhang, and Zhihong Zhuo
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 5487–5512, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-5487-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-5487-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
To understand the climate impact of the 2022 Hunga volcanic eruption, we developed a climate model–observation comparison project. The paper describes the protocols and models that participate in the experiments. We designed several experiments to achieve our goals of this activity: (1) to evaluate the climate model performance and (2) to understand the Earth system responses to this eruption.
Ales Kuchar, Timofei Sukhodolov, Gabriel Chiodo, Andrin Jörimann, Jessica Kult-Herdin, Eugene Rozanov, and Harald H. Rieder
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 3623–3634, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-3623-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-3623-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
In January 2022, the Hunga Tonga–Hunga Ha'apai (HTHH) volcano erupted, sending massive amounts of water vapour into the atmosphere. This event had a significant impact on stratospheric and lower-mesospheric chemical composition. Two years later, stratospheric conditions were disturbed during so-called sudden stratospheric warmings. Here we simulate a novel pathway by which this water-rich eruption may have contributed to conditions during these events and consequently impacted the surface climate.
Andrin Jörimann, Timofei Sukhodolov, Beiping Luo, Gabriel Chiodo, Graham Mann, and Thomas Peter
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-145, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-145, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Aerosol particles in the stratosphere affect our climate. Climate models therefore need an accurate description of their properties and evolution. Satellites measure how strongly aerosol particles extinguish light passing through the stratosphere. We describe a method to use such aerosol extinction data to retrieve the number and sizes of the aerosol particles and calculate their optical effects. The resulting data sets for models are validated against ground-based and balloon observations.
Jingyu Wang, Gabriel Chiodo, Timofei Sukhodolov, Blanca Ayarzagüena, William T. Ball, Mohamadou Diallo, Birgit Hassler, James Keeble, Peer Nowack, Clara Orbe, and Sandro Vattioni
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-340, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-340, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We analyzed the ozone response under elevated CO2 using the data from CMIP6 DECK experiments. We then looked at the relations between ozone response and temperature and circulation changes to identify drivers of the ozone change. The climate feedback of ozone is investigated by doing offline calculations and comparing models with and without interactive chemistry. We find that ozone-climate interactions are important for Earth System Models, thus should be considered in future model development.
Sandro Vattioni, Rahel Weber, Aryeh Feinberg, Andrea Stenke, John A. Dykema, Beiping Luo, Georgios A. Kelesidis, Christian A. Bruun, Timofei Sukhodolov, Frank N. Keutsch, Thomas Peter, and Gabriel Chiodo
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7767–7793, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7767-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7767-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We quantified impacts and efficiency of stratospheric solar climate intervention via solid particle injection. Microphysical interactions of solid particles with the sulfur cycle were interactively coupled to the heterogeneous chemistry scheme and the radiative transfer code of an aerosol–chemistry–climate model. Compared to injection of SO2 we only find a stronger cooling efficiency for solid particles when normalizing to the aerosol load but not when normalizing to the injection rate.
Miriam Sinnhuber, Christina Arras, Stefan Bender, Bernd Funke, Hanli Liu, Daniel R. Marsh, Thomas Reddmann, Eugene Rozanov, Timofei Sukhodolov, Monika E. Szelag, and Jan Maik Wissing
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2256, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2256, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Formation of nitric oxide NO in the upper atmosphere varies with solar activity. Observations show that it starts a chain of processes in the entire atmosphere affecting the ozone layer and climate system. This is often underestimated in models. We compare five models which show large differences in simulated NO. Analysis of results point out problems related to the oxygen balance, and to the impact of atmospheric waves on dynamics. Both must be modeled well to reproduce the downward coupling.
Sandro Vattioni, Andrea Stenke, Beiping Luo, Gabriel Chiodo, Timofei Sukhodolov, Elia Wunderlin, and Thomas Peter
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4181–4197, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4181-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4181-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We investigate the sensitivity of aerosol size distributions in the presence of strong SO2 injections for climate interventions or after volcanic eruptions to the call sequence and frequency of the routines for nucleation and condensation in sectional aerosol models with operator splitting. Using the aerosol–chemistry–climate model SOCOL-AERv2, we show that the radiative and chemical outputs are sensitive to these settings at high H2SO4 supersaturations and how to obtain reliable results.
Christina V. Brodowsky, Timofei Sukhodolov, Gabriel Chiodo, Valentina Aquila, Slimane Bekki, Sandip S. Dhomse, Michael Höpfner, Anton Laakso, Graham W. Mann, Ulrike Niemeier, Giovanni Pitari, Ilaria Quaglia, Eugene Rozanov, Anja Schmidt, Takashi Sekiya, Simone Tilmes, Claudia Timmreck, Sandro Vattioni, Daniele Visioni, Pengfei Yu, Yunqian Zhu, and Thomas Peter
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 5513–5548, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-5513-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-5513-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The aerosol layer is an essential part of the climate system. We characterize the sulfur budget in a volcanically quiescent (background) setting, with a special focus on the sulfate aerosol layer using, for the first time, a multi-model approach. The aim is to identify weak points in the representation of the atmospheric sulfur budget in an intercomparison of nine state-of-the-art coupled global circulation models.
Bernd Funke, Thierry Dudok de Wit, Ilaria Ermolli, Margit Haberreiter, Doug Kinnison, Daniel Marsh, Hilde Nesse, Annika Seppälä, Miriam Sinnhuber, and Ilya Usoskin
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1217–1227, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1217-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1217-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We outline a road map for the preparation of a solar forcing dataset for the upcoming Phase 7 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP7), considering the latest scientific advances made in the reconstruction of solar forcing and in the understanding of climate response while also addressing the issues that were raised during CMIP6.
Franziska Zilker, Timofei Sukhodolov, Gabriel Chiodo, Marina Friedel, Tatiana Egorova, Eugene Rozanov, Jan Sedlacek, Svenja Seeber, and Thomas Peter
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 13387–13411, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-13387-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-13387-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The Montreal Protocol (MP) has successfully reduced the Antarctic ozone hole by banning chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) that destroy the ozone layer. Moreover, CFCs are strong greenhouse gases (GHGs) that would have strengthened global warming. In this study, we investigate the surface weather and climate in a world without the MP at the end of the 21st century, disentangling ozone-mediated and GHG impacts of CFCs. Overall, we avoided 1.7 K global surface warming and a poleward shift in storm tracks.
Monali Borthakur, Miriam Sinnhuber, Alexandra Laeng, Thomas Reddmann, Peter Braesicke, Gabriele Stiller, Thomas von Clarmann, Bernd Funke, Ilya Usoskin, Jan Maik Wissing, and Olesya Yakovchuk
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 12985–13013, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-12985-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-12985-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Reduced ozone levels resulting from ozone depletion mean more exposure to UV radiation, which has various effects on human health. We analysed solar events to see what influence it has on the chemistry of Earth's atmosphere and how this atmospheric chemistry change can affect the ozone. To do this, we used an atmospheric model considering only chemistry and compared it with satellite data. The focus was mainly on the contribution of chlorine, and we found about 10 %–20 % ozone loss due to that.
Gabriel Chiodo, Marina Friedel, Svenja Seeber, Daniela Domeisen, Andrea Stenke, Timofei Sukhodolov, and Franziska Zilker
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 10451–10472, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-10451-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-10451-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Stratospheric ozone protects the biosphere from harmful UV radiation. Anthropogenic activity has led to a reduction in the ozone layer in the recent past, but thanks to the implementation of the Montreal Protocol, the ozone layer is projected to recover. In this study, we show that projected future changes in Arctic ozone abundances during springtime will influence stratospheric climate and thereby actively modulate large-scale circulation changes in the Northern Hemisphere.
Marina Friedel, Gabriel Chiodo, Timofei Sukhodolov, James Keeble, Thomas Peter, Svenja Seeber, Andrea Stenke, Hideharu Akiyoshi, Eugene Rozanov, David Plummer, Patrick Jöckel, Guang Zeng, Olaf Morgenstern, and Béatrice Josse
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 10235–10254, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-10235-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-10235-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Previously, it has been suggested that springtime Arctic ozone depletion might worsen in the coming decades due to climate change, which might counteract the effect of reduced ozone-depleting substances. Here, we show with different chemistry–climate models that springtime Arctic ozone depletion will likely decrease in the future. Further, we explain why models show a large spread in the projected development of Arctic ozone depletion and use the model spread to constrain future projections.
Thomas Reddmann, Miriam Sinnhuber, Jan Maik Wissing, Olesya Yakovchuk, and Ilya Usoskin
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 6989–7000, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-6989-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-6989-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Recent analyses of isotopic records of ice cores and sediments have shown that very strong explosions may occur on the Sun, perhaps about one such explosion every 1000 years. Such explosions pose a real threat to humankind. It is therefore of great interest to study the impact of such explosions on Earth. We analyzed how the explosions would affect the chemistry of the middle atmosphere and show that the related ozone loss is not dramatic and that the atmosphere will recover within 1 year.
Tatiana Egorova, Jan Sedlacek, Timofei Sukhodolov, Arseniy Karagodin-Doyennel, Franziska Zilker, and Eugene Rozanov
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 5135–5147, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-5135-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-5135-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This paper describes the climate and atmosphere benefits of the Montreal Protocol, simulated with the state-of-the-art Earth system model SOCOLv4.0. We have added to and confirmed the previous studies by showing that without the Montreal Protocol by the end of the 21st century there would be a dramatic reduction in the ozone layer as well as substantial perturbation of the essential climate variables in the troposphere caused by the warming from increasing ozone-depleting substances.
Arseniy Karagodin-Doyennel, Eugene Rozanov, Timofei Sukhodolov, Tatiana Egorova, Jan Sedlacek, and Thomas Peter
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 4801–4817, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-4801-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-4801-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The future ozone evolution in SOCOLv4 simulations under SSP2-4.5 and SSP5-8.5 scenarios has been assessed for the period 2015–2099 and subperiods using the DLM approach. The SOCOLv4 projects a decline in tropospheric ozone in the 2030s in SSP2-4.5 and in the 2060s in SSP5-8.5. The stratospheric ozone increase is ~3 times higher in SSP5-8.5, confirming the important role of GHGs in ozone evolution. We also showed that tropospheric ozone strongly impacts the total column in the tropics.
Andrey V. Koval, Olga N. Toptunova, Maxim A. Motsakov, Ksenia A. Didenko, Tatiana S. Ermakova, Nikolai M. Gavrilov, and Eugene V. Rozanov
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 4105–4114, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-4105-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-4105-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Periodic changes in all hydrodynamic parameters are constantly observed in the atmosphere. The amplitude of these fluctuations increases with height due to a decrease in the atmospheric density. In the upper layers of the atmosphere, waves are the dominant form of motion. We use a model of the general circulation of the atmosphere to study the contribution to the formation of the dynamic and temperature regimes of the middle and upper atmosphere made by different global-scale atmospheric waves.
Ilaria Quaglia, Claudia Timmreck, Ulrike Niemeier, Daniele Visioni, Giovanni Pitari, Christina Brodowsky, Christoph Brühl, Sandip S. Dhomse, Henning Franke, Anton Laakso, Graham W. Mann, Eugene Rozanov, and Timofei Sukhodolov
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 921–948, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-921-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-921-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The last very large explosive volcanic eruption we have measurements for is the eruption of Mt. Pinatubo in 1991. It is therefore often used as a benchmark for climate models' ability to reproduce these kinds of events. Here, we compare available measurements with the results from multiple experiments conducted with climate models interactively simulating the aerosol cloud formation.
Arseniy Karagodin-Doyennel, Eugene Rozanov, Timofei Sukhodolov, Tatiana Egorova, Jan Sedlacek, William Ball, and Thomas Peter
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 15333–15350, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-15333-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-15333-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Applying the dynamic linear model, we confirm near-global ozone recovery (55°N–55°S) in the mesosphere, upper and middle stratosphere, and a steady increase in the troposphere. We also show that modern chemistry–climate models (CCMs) like SOCOLv4 may reproduce the observed trend distribution of lower stratospheric ozone, despite exhibiting a lower magnitude and statistical significance. The obtained ozone trend pattern in SOCOLv4 is generally consistent with observations and reanalysis datasets.
Irina Mironova, Miriam Sinnhuber, Galina Bazilevskaya, Mark Clilverd, Bernd Funke, Vladimir Makhmutov, Eugene Rozanov, Michelle L. Santee, Timofei Sukhodolov, and Thomas Ulich
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 6703–6716, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-6703-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-6703-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
From balloon measurements, we detected unprecedented, extremely powerful, electron precipitation over the middle latitudes. The robustness of this event is confirmed by satellite observations of electron fluxes and chemical composition, as well as by ground-based observations of the radio signal propagation. The applied chemistry–climate model shows the almost complete destruction of ozone in the mesosphere over the region where high-energy electrons were observed.
Arseniy Karagodin-Doyennel, Eugene Rozanov, Timofei Sukhodolov, Tatiana Egorova, Alfonso Saiz-Lopez, Carlos A. Cuevas, Rafael P. Fernandez, Tomás Sherwen, Rainer Volkamer, Theodore K. Koenig, Tanguy Giroud, and Thomas Peter
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 6623–6645, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6623-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6623-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Here, we present the iodine chemistry module in the SOCOL-AERv2 model. The obtained iodine distribution demonstrated a good agreement when validated against other simulations and available observations. We also estimated the iodine influence on ozone in the case of present-day iodine emissions, the sensitivity of ozone to doubled iodine emissions, and when considering only organic or inorganic iodine sources. The new model can be used as a tool for further studies of iodine effects on ozone.
Timofei Sukhodolov, Tatiana Egorova, Andrea Stenke, William T. Ball, Christina Brodowsky, Gabriel Chiodo, Aryeh Feinberg, Marina Friedel, Arseniy Karagodin-Doyennel, Thomas Peter, Jan Sedlacek, Sandro Vattioni, and Eugene Rozanov
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 5525–5560, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5525-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5525-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This paper features the new atmosphere–ocean–aerosol–chemistry–climate model SOCOLv4.0 and its validation. The model performance is evaluated against reanalysis products and observations of atmospheric circulation and trace gas distribution, with a focus on stratospheric processes. Although we identified some problems to be addressed in further model upgrades, we demonstrated that SOCOLv4.0 is already well suited for studies related to chemistry–climate–aerosol interactions.
Margot Clyne, Jean-Francois Lamarque, Michael J. Mills, Myriam Khodri, William Ball, Slimane Bekki, Sandip S. Dhomse, Nicolas Lebas, Graham Mann, Lauren Marshall, Ulrike Niemeier, Virginie Poulain, Alan Robock, Eugene Rozanov, Anja Schmidt, Andrea Stenke, Timofei Sukhodolov, Claudia Timmreck, Matthew Toohey, Fiona Tummon, Davide Zanchettin, Yunqian Zhu, and Owen B. Toon
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 3317–3343, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-3317-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-3317-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This study finds how and why five state-of-the-art global climate models with interactive stratospheric aerosols differ when simulating the aftermath of large volcanic injections as part of the Model Intercomparison Project on the climatic response to Volcanic forcing (VolMIP). We identify and explain the consequences of significant disparities in the underlying physics and chemistry currently in some of the models, which are problems likely not unique to the models participating in this study.
Arseniy Karagodin-Doyennel, Eugene Rozanov, Ales Kuchar, William Ball, Pavle Arsenovic, Ellis Remsberg, Patrick Jöckel, Markus Kunze, David A. Plummer, Andrea Stenke, Daniel Marsh, Doug Kinnison, and Thomas Peter
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 201–216, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-201-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-201-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The solar signal in the mesospheric H2O and CO was extracted from the CCMI-1 model simulations and satellite observations using multiple linear regression (MLR) analysis. MLR analysis shows a pronounced and statistically robust solar signal in both H2O and CO. The model results show a general agreement with observations reproducing a negative/positive solar signal in H2O/CO. The pattern of the solar signal varies among the considered models, reflecting some differences in the model setup.
Cited articles
Brattich, E., Liu, H., Tositti, L., Considine, D. B., and Crawford, J. H.: Processes controlling the seasonal variations in 210Pb and 7Be at the Mt. Cimone WMO-GAW global station, Italy: a model analysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 1061–1080, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1061-2017, 2017. a, b
Brattich, E., Orza, J. A. G., Cristofanelli, P., Bonasoni, P., Marinoni, A., and Tositti, L.: Advection pathways at the Mt. Cimone WMO-GAW station: Seasonality, trends, and influence on atmospheric composition, Atmos. Environ., 234, 117513, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117513, 2020. a
Brattich, E., Liu, H., Zhang, B., Hernández-Ceballos, M. Á., Paatero, J., Sarvan, D., Djurdjevic, V., Tositti, L., and Ajtić, J.: Observation and modeling of high-7Be events in Northern Europe associated with the instability of the Arctic polar vortex in early 2003, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss. [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2020-1121, in review, 2021. a
Brost, R. A., Feichter, J., and Heimann, M.: Three-dimensional simulation of 7Be in a global climate model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 96, 22423–22445, https://doi.org/10.1029/91JD02283, 1991. a
Butchart, N.: The Brewer-Dobson circulation, Rev. Geophys., 52, 157–184, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013RG000448, 2014. a
Cohen, N., Gerber, E., and Bühler, O.: What Drives the Brewer-Dobson Circulation?, J. Atmos. Sci., 71, 3837–3855, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-14-0021.1, 2014. a
Comprehensive Nuclear Test-Ban-Treaty Organization: Beryllium-7 data, CTBTO [data set], available at: https://www.ctbto.org/specials/vdec/vdec-request-for-access, last access: 1 September 2021. a
Cooke, D., Humble, J., Shea, M., Smart, D., Lund, N., Rasmussen, I., Byrnak, B., Goret, P., and Petrou, N.: On cosmic-ray cut-off terminology, Nuovo Cimento C, 14, 213–234, 1991. a
Copernicus Climate Change Service: ERA5 data, Climate Data Store [data set], available at: https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/#!/search?text=ERA5&type=datase, last access: 1 September 2021. a
Delaygue, G., Bekki, S., and Bard, E.: Modelling the stratospheric budget of beryllium isotopes, Tellus B, 67, 28582, https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v67.28582, 2015. a, b
Desai, M. and Giacalone, J.: Large gradual solar energetic particle events, Living Rev. Sol. Phys., 13, 3, https://doi.org/10.1007/s41116-016-0002-5, 2016. a
Dorman, L.: Cosmic Rays in the Earth's Atmosphere and Underground, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 2004. a
Egorova, T., Rozanov, E., Zubov, V., and Karol, I.: Model for investigating ozone trends (MEZON), Izv. Atmos. Ocean Phy., 39, 277–292, 2003. a
Emery, W. and Camps, A.: Introduction to Satellite Remote Sensing, Elsevier,
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809254-5.00008-7, 2017. a
Feinberg, A., Sukhodolov, T., Luo, B.-P., Rozanov, E., Winkel, L. H. E., Peter, T., and Stenke, A.: Improved tropospheric and stratospheric sulfur cycle in the aerosol–chemistry–climate model SOCOL-AERv2, Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 3863–3887, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3863-2019, 2019. a, b, c, d
Field, C., Schmidt, G., Koch, D., and Salyk, C.: Modeling production and climate-related impacts on 10Be concentration in ice cores, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D15107, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006410, 2006. a, b, c
Finnish National Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority: Beryllium-7 data, STUK [data set], available at: https://www.stuk.fi/avoin-data/ohjeet, last access: 1 September 2021. a
Fraser-Smith, A. C.: Centered and eccentric geomagnetic dipoles and their poles, 1600–1985., Rev. Geophys., 25, 1–16, 1987. a
Geant4 collaboration: Physics reference manual (version Geant4 10.6.0),
available at: https://geant4.web.cern.ch/support (last access: 1 September 2021), 2020. a
Gleeson, L. and Axford, W.: Solar Modulation of Galactic Cosmic Rays, Astrophys. J., 154, 1011–1026, https://doi.org/10.1086/149822, 1968. a
Golubenko, K., Rozanov, E., Mironova, I., Karagodin, A., and Usoskin, I.: Natural Sources of Ionization and Their Impact on Atmospheric Electricity, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e88619, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL088619, 2020. a
Golubenko, K., Rozanov, E., Sukhodolov, T., and Usoskin, I.: CCM SOCOL-AERv2-BEv1, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5006356, 2021. a
Haltia, E., Leppänen, A.-P., Kallio, A., and Saarinen, T.: Sediment profile dating and reconstructing nuclear events from annually laminated lake sediments in northern Finland, J. Environ. Radioactiv., 233, 106611, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2021.106611, 2021. a
Hauglustaine, D. A., Granier, C., Brasseur, G. P., and MéGie, G.: The importance of atmospheric chemistry in the calculation of radiative forcing on the climate system, J. Geophys. Res., 99, 1173–1186, https://doi.org/10.1029/93JD02987, 1994. a
Heck, D., Knapp, J., Capdevielle, J., Schatz, G., and Thouw, T.: CORSIKA: A Monte Carlo Code to Simulate Extensive Air Showers, in: FZKA 6019, Forschungszentrum, Karlsruhe, 1998. a
Heikkilä, U., Beer, J., and Alfimov, V.: Beryllium-10 and beryllium-7 in precipitation in Dübendorf (440 m) and at Jungfraujoch (3580 m), Switzerland (1998–2005), J. Geophys. Res., 113, D11104, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009160, 2008a. a, b
Heikkilä, U., Beer, J., and Feichter, J.: Modeling cosmogenic radionuclides 10Be and 7Be during the Maunder Minimum using the ECHAM5-HAM General Circulation Model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 2797–2809, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-2797-2008, 2008b. a, b, c
Heikkilä, U., Beer, J., and Feichter, J.: Meridional transport and deposition of atmospheric 10Be, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 515–527, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-515-2009, 2009. a, b, c, d
Heikkilä, U., Beer, J., Abreu, J. A., and Steinhilber, F.: On the Atmospheric Transport and Deposition of the Cosmogenic Radionuclides (10Be): A Review, Space Sci. Rev., 176, 321–332, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-011-9838-0, 2013. a, b
Hommel, R., Timmreck, C., and Graf, H. F.: The global middle-atmosphere aerosol model MAECHAM5-SAM2: comparison with satellite and in-situ observations, Geosci. Model Dev., 4, 809–834, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-809-2011, 2011. a
Ioannidou, A. and Paatero, J.: Activity size distribution and residence time of 7Be aerosols in the Arctic atmosphere, Atmos. Environ., 88, 99–106, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.12.046, 2014. a
Jordan, C. E., Dibb, J. E., and Finkel, R. C.: 10Be
Kerkweg, A., Buchholz, J., Ganzeveld, L., Pozzer, A., Tost, H., and Jöckel, P.: Technical Note: An implementation of the dry removal processes DRY DEPosition and SEDImentation in the Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 4617–4632, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-4617-2006, 2006a. a
Kerkweg, A., Buchholz, J., Ganzeveld, L., Pozzer, A., Tost, H., and Jöckel, P.: Technical Note: An implementation of the dry removal processes DRY DEPosition and SEDImentation in the Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 4617–4632, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-4617-2006, 2006b. a
Koch, D., Schmidt, G. A., and Field, C. V.: Sulfur, sea salt and radionuclide aerosols in GISS ModelE, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D06206, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005550, 2006. a
Koldobskiy, S. A., Raukunen, O., Vainio, R., Kovaltsov, G., and Usoskin, I.: New reconstruction of event-integrated spectra (spectral fluences) for major solar energetic particle events, Astron. Astrophys., 647, A132, https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202040058, 2021. a
Land, C. and Feichter, J.: Stratosphere–troposphere exchange in a changing climate simulated with the general circulation model MAECHAM4, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 8523, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002543, 2003. a
Leppänen, A.: Deposition of naturally occurring 7Be and 210Pb in Northern Finland, J. Environ. Radioactiv., 208–209, 105995, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2019.105995, 2019. a
Leppänen, A.-P., Usoskin, I. G., Kovaltsov, G. A., and Paatero, J.: Cosmogenic 7Be and 22Na in Finland: Production, observed periodicities and the connection to climatic phenomena, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phy., 74, 164–180, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2011.10.017, 2012. a, b
Lin, S. and Rood, R.: Multidimensional flux-form semi-Lagrangian transport schemes, Mon. Weather Rev., 124, 2046–2070, 1996. a
McCracken, K.: Geomagnetic and atmospheric effects upon the cosmogenic 10Be observed in polar ice, J. Geophys. Res., 109, A04101, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JA010060, 2004. a
Medici, F.: Particulate sampling in the IMS radionuclide network of the Comprehensive-Nuclear Test Ban Treaty, Kerntechnik, 66, 121–125, 2001. a
Miley, H., Bowyer, S., Hubbard, C., McKinnon, A., Perkins, R., Thompson, R., and Warner, R.: A description of the DOE Radionuclide Aerosol Sampler/Analyzer for the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Ch., 235, 83–87, 1998. a
Mironova, I. A., Aplin, K. L., Arnold, F., Bazilevskaya, G. A., Harrison, R. G., Krivolutsky, A. A., Nicoll, K. A., Rozanov, E. V., Turunen, E., and Usoskin, I. G.: Energetic Particle Influence on the Earth's Atmosphere, Space Sci Rev., 194, 1–96, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-015-0185-4, 2015. a
Miyake, F., Nagaya, K., Masuda, K., and Nakamura, T.: A signature of cosmic-ray increase in ad 774–775 from tree rings in Japan, Nature, 486, 240–242, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11123, 2012. a
Monge-Sanz, B. and Chipperfield, M.: Chemical transport modelling, in:
ECMWF/Geo Workshop on Atmospheric Reanalyis, 19–22 June 2006, ECMWF,
Shinfield Park, Reading, 39–44, available at: https://www.ecmwf.int/node/11221 (last access: 1 May 2021), 2006. a
Nordeng, T.-E.: Extended versions of the convective parametrization scheme at ECMWF and their impact on the mean and transient activity of the model in the tropics, p. 41, https://doi.org/10.21957/e34xwhysw, https://www.ecmwf.int/node/11393 (last access: 1 September 2021), 1994. a
Pacini, A. A., Usoskin, I. G., Evangelista, H., Echer, E., and de Paula, R.: Cosmogenic isotope 7Be: A case study of depositional processes in Rio de Janeiro in 2008–2009, Adv. Space Res., 48, 811–818, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2011.04.035, 2011. a
Pacini, A. A., Usoskin, I. G., Mursula, K., Echer, E., and Evangelista, H.: Signature of a sudden stratospheric warming in the near-ground 7Be flux, Atmos. Environ., 113, 27–31, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.04.065, 2015. a, b
Pierce, J. R., Weisenstein, D. K., Heckendorn, P., Peter, T., and Keith, D. W.: Efficient formation of stratospheric aerosol for climate engineering by emission of condensible vapor from aircraft, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L18805, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL043975, 2010. a
Poluianov, S., Kovaltsov, G. A., Mishev, A. L., and Usoskin, I. G.: Production of cosmogenic isotopes 7Be, 10Be, 14C, 22Na, and 36Cl in the atmosphere: Altitudinal profiles of yield functions, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 8125–8136, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025034, 2016. a
Radiation Protection Bureau of Health Canada: Beryllium-7 data, RPBHC [data set], available at: https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/corporate/contact-us/, last access: 1 September 2021. a
Raisbeck, G. M., Yiou, F., Fruneau, M., Loiseaux, J. M., Lieuvin, M., and Ravel, J. C.: Cosmogenic 10Be
Raukunen, O., Vainio, R., Tylka, A. J., Dietrich, W. F., Jiggens, P., Heynderickx, D., Dierckxsens, M., Crosby, N., Ganse, U., and Siipola, R.: Two solar proton fluence models based on ground level enhancement observations, J. Space Weather Spac., 8, A04, https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2017031, 2018. a
Roeckner, E., Bauml, G., Bonaventura, L., Brokopf, R., Esch, M., Giorgetta, M., Hagemann, S., Kirchner, I., Kornblueh, L., Manzini, E., Rhodin, A., Schlese, U., Schulzweida, U., and Tompkins, A.: The atmospheric general circulation model ECHAM5, PART I: Model description, Tech. rep., Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, MPI-Report 349, available at: http://www.mpimet.mpg.de/fileadmin/publikationen/Reports/max scirep 349.pdf (last access: 1 September 2021), 2003. a
Steinhilber, F., Abreu, J., Beer, J., Brunner, I., Christl, M., Fischer, H., Heikkilae, U., Kubik, P., Mann, M., McCracken, K., Miller, H., Miyahara, H., Oerter, H., and Wilhelms, F.: 9,400 years of cosmic radiation and solar activity from ice cores and tree rings, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 109, 5967–5971, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1118965109, 2012. a
Stenke, A., Schraner, M., Rozanov, E., Egorova, T., Luo, B., and Peter, T.: The SOCOL version 3.0 chemistry–climate model: description, evaluation, and implications from an advanced transport algorithm, Geosci. Model Dev., 6, 1407–1427, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-1407-2013, 2013. a
Sukhodolov, T., Usoskin, I., Rozanov, E., Asvestari, E., Ball, W., Curran, M., Fischer, H., Kovaltsov, G., Miyake, F., Peter, T., Plummer, C., Schmutz, W., Severi, M., and Traversi, R.: Atmospheric impacts of the strongest known solar particle storm of 775 AD, Sci. Rep.-UK, 7, 45257, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep45257, 2017. a, b, c, d, e
Terzi, L., Wotawa, G., Schoeppner, M., Kalinowski, M., Saey, P. R. J., Steinmann, P., Luan, L., and Staten, P. W.: Radioisotopes demonstrate changes in global atmospheric circulation possibly caused by global warming, Sci. Rep.-UK, 10, 10695, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-66541-5, 2020. a
Thébault, E., Finlay, C. C., Beggan, C. D., Alken, P., Aubert, J., Barrois, O., Bertrand, F., Bondar, T., Boness, A., Brocco, L., Canet, E., Chambodut, A., Chulliat, A., Coïsson, P., Civet, F., Du, A., Fournier, A., Fratter, I., Gillet, N., Hamilton, B., Hamoudi, M., Hulot, G., Jager, T., Korte, M., Kuang, W., Lalanne, X., Langlais, B., Léger, J.-M., Lesur, V., Lowes, F. J., Macmillan, S., Mandea, M., Manoj, C., Maus, S., Olsen, N., Petrov, V., Ridley, V., Rother, M., Sabaka, T. J., Saturnino, D., Schachtschneider, R., Sirol, O., Tangborn, A., Thomson, A., Tøffner-Clausen, L., Vigneron, P., Wardinski, I., and Zvereva, T.: International Geomagnetic Reference Field: the 12th generation, Earth Planets Space, 67, 79, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-015-0228-9, 2015. a
Tiedtke, M.: A comprehensive mass flux scheme for cumulus parameterization in large-scale models, Mon. Weather Rev., 117, 1779–1800, 1989. a
Tost, H., Jöckel, P., Kerkweg, A., Pozzer, A., Sander, R., and Lelieveld, J.: Global cloud and precipitation chemistry and wet deposition: tropospheric model simulations with ECHAM5/MESSy1, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 2733–2757, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-2733-2007, 2007. a
Tost, H., Lawrence, M. G., Brühl, C., Jöckel, P., The GABRIEL Team, and The SCOUT-O3-DARWIN/ACTIVE Team: Uncertainties in atmospheric chemistry modelling due to convection parameterisations and subsequent scavenging, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 1931–1951, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1931-2010, 2010. a
Usoskin, I. and Kovaltsov, G.: Production of cosmogenic 7Be isotope in the atmosphere: Full 3D modelling, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D12107, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009725, 2008. a, b
Usoskin, I., Solanki, S., Kovaltsov, G., Beer, J., and Kromer, B.: Solar proton events in cosmogenic isotope data, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L08107, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL026059, 2006. a
Usoskin, I., Koldobskiy, S., Kovaltsov, G., Rozanov, E., Sukhodolov, T., Mishev, A., and Mironova, I.: Revisited Reference Solar Proton Event of 23 February 1956: Assessment of the Cosmogenic-Isotope Method Sensitivity to Extreme Solar Events, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 125, e27921, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JA027921, 2020a. a, b, c, d, e
Usoskin, I., Koldobskiy, S., Kovaltsov, G. A., Gil, A., Usoskina, I., Willamo, T., and Ibragimov, A.: Revised GLE database: Fluences of solar energetic particles as measured by the neutron-monitor network since 1956, Astron. Astrophys., 640, A17, https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202038272, 2020b. a
Usoskin, I. G.: A History of Solar Activity over Millennia, Living Rev. Sol. Phys., 14, 3, https://doi.org/10.1007/s41116-017-0006-9, 2017. a
Usoskin, I. G., Field, C. V., Schmidt, G. A., Leppänen, A.-P., Aldahan, A., Kovaltsov, G. A., Possnert, G., and Ungar, R. K.: Short-term production and synoptic influences on atmospheric 7Be concentrations, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D06108, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011333, 2009a. a, b, c
Usoskin, I. G., Horiuchi, K., Solanki, S., Kovaltsov, G. A., and Bard, E.: On the common solar signal in different cosmogenic isotope data sets, J. Geophys. Res., 114, A03112, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JA013888, 2009b. a, b
Usoskin, I. G., Mironova, I. A., Korte, M., and Kovaltsov, G. A.: Regional millennial trend in the cosmic ray induced ionization of the troposphere, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phy., 72, 19–25, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2009.10.003, 2010. a
Usoskin, I. G., Gil, A., Kovaltsov, G. A., Mishev, A. L., and Mikhailov, V. V.: Heliospheric modulation of cosmic rays during the neutron monitor era: Calibration using PAMELA data for 2006–2010, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 122, 3875–3887, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA023819, 2017. a
Vainio, R., Desorgher, L., Heynderickx, D., Storini, M., Flückiger, E., Horne, R. B., Kovaltsov, G. A., Kudela, K., Laurenza, M., McKenna-Lawlor, S., Rothkaehl, H., and Usoskin, I. G.: Dynamics of the Earth's particle radiation environment, Space Sci. Rev., 147, 187–231, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-009-9496-7, 2009. a
Weisenstein, D. K., Yue, G. K., Ko, M. K. W., Sze, N.-D., Rodriguez, J. M., and Scott, C. J.: A two-dimensional model of sulfur species and aerosols, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 102, 13019–13035, https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD00901, 1997. a
Weisenstein, D. K., Keith, D. W., and Dykema, J. A.: Solar geoengineering using solid aerosol in the stratosphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 11835–11859, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11835-2015, 2015. a
Wesely, M. L.: Parameterization of surface resistances to gaseous dry deposition in regional-scale numerical models, Atmos. Environ., 23, 1293–1304, https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(89)90153-4, 1989. a
Wu, C. J., Usoskin, I. G., Krivova, N., Kovaltsov, G. A., Baroni, M., Bard, E., and Solanki, S. K.: Solar activity over nine millennia: A consistent multi-proxy reconstruction, Astron. Astrophys., 615, A93, https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201731892, 2018. a
Zheng, M., Sjolte, J., Adolphi, F., Aldahan, A., Possnert, G., Wu, M., and Muscheler, R.: Solar and meteorological influences on seasonal atmospheric 7Be in Europe for 1975 to 2018, Chemosphere, 263, 128318, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128318, 2021.
a
Zhou, T., Geller, M. A., and Hamilton, K.: The roles of the Hadley circulation and downward control in tropical upwelling, J. Atmos. Sci., 63, 2740–2757, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3770.1, 2006. a
Short summary
A new full 3-D time-dependent model, based on SOCOL-AERv2, of beryllium atmospheric production, transport, and deposition has been developed and validated using directly measured data. The model is recommended to be used in studies related to, e.g., atmospheric dynamical patterns, extreme solar particle storms, long-term solar activity reconstruction from cosmogenic proxy data, and solar–terrestrial relations.
A new full 3-D time-dependent model, based on SOCOL-AERv2, of beryllium atmospheric production,...
