<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">GMD</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Geoscientific Model Development</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">GMD</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Geosci. Model Dev.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1991-9603</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/gmd-14-7605-2021</article-id><title-group><article-title>Application of CCM SOCOL-AERv2-BE to cosmogenic beryllium isotopes: description and validation for polar regions</article-title><alt-title>Beryllium modeling with CCM SOCOL-AERv2-BE</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Beryllium modeling with CCM SOCOL-AERv2-BE}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{K.~Golubenko et~al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Golubenko</surname><given-names>Kseniia</given-names></name>
          <email>kseniia.golubenko@oulu.fi</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7489-9037</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2 aff3 aff4">
          <name><surname>Rozanov</surname><given-names>Eugene</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0479-4488</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Kovaltsov</surname><given-names>Gennady</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>Leppänen</surname><given-names>Ari-Pekka</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9776-5223</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2 aff4 aff7">
          <name><surname>Sukhodolov</surname><given-names>Timofei</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff8">
          <name><surname>Usoskin</surname><given-names>Ilya</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8227-9081</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Space Physics and Astronomy Research Unit, University of Oulu, 90570, Finland</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Physikalisch-Meteorologisches Observatorium Davos and World Radiation Center, Davos Dorf, 7260, Switzerland</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH Zurich, Zurich, 8092, Switzerland</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, 198504, Russia</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Ioffe Physical–Technical Institute, St. Petersburg, 194021, Russia</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority – STUK, Rovaniemi, 96400, Finland</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff7"><label>7</label><institution>Institute of Meteorology and Climatology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, 1180, Austria</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff8"><label>8</label><institution>Sodankylä Geophysical Observatory, University of Oulu, Sodankylä, 99600, Finland</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Kseniia Golubenko (kseniia.golubenko@oulu.fi)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>16</day><month>December</month><year>2021</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>14</volume>
      <issue>12</issue>
      <fpage>7605</fpage><lpage>7620</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>26</day><month>February</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>9</day><month>November</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>27</day><month>October</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>7</day><month>April</month><year>2021</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2021 Kseniia Golubenko et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2021</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/14/7605/2021/gmd-14-7605-2021.html">This article is available from https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/14/7605/2021/gmd-14-7605-2021.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/14/7605/2021/gmd-14-7605-2021.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/14/7605/2021/gmd-14-7605-2021.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <?pagebreak page7606?><p id="d1e175">The short-living cosmogenic isotope <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be, which is produced by cosmic rays in the
atmosphere, is often used as a tracer for atmospheric dynamics, with precise
and high-resolution measurements covering the recent decades.  The long-living
isotope <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be, as measured in polar ice cores with an annual resolution,
is a proxy for long-term cosmic-ray variability, whose signal can, however,
be distorted by atmospheric transport and deposition that need to be properly
modeled to be accounted for.  While transport of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be can be modeled with
high accuracy using the known meteorological fields, atmospheric transport of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be was typically modeled using case-study-specific simulations or
simplified box models based on parameterizations.  Thus, there is a need for a
realistic model able to simulate atmospheric transport and deposition of
beryllium with a focus on polar regions and (inter)annual timescales that is
potentially able to operate in a self-consistent mode without the prescribed
meteorology.  Since measurements of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be are extremely laborious and
hence scarce, it is difficult to compare model results directly with
measurement data.  On the other hand, the two beryllium isotopes are believed
to have similar transport and deposition properties, being different only in
production and  lifetime, and thus the results of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be transport can be
generally applied to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be.  Here we present a new model, called CCM
SOCOL-AERv2-BE, to trace isotopes of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be in the atmosphere
based on the chemistry–climate model (CCM) SOCOL (SOlar Climate Ozone Links),
which has been improved by including modules for the production, deposition,
and transport of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be. Production of the isotopes was modeled
for both galactic and solar cosmic rays by applying the CRAC (Cosmic Ray
Atmospheric Cascade) model.  Transport of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be was modeled without
additional gravitational settling due to the submicron size of the background
aerosol particles.  An interactive deposition scheme was applied including
both wet and dry deposition.  Modeling was performed using a full nudging to
the meteorological fields for the period of 2002–2008 with a spin-up period
of 1996–2001.  The modeled concentrations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be in near-ground air were
compared with the measured ones at a weekly time resolution in four nearly
antipodal high-latitude locations: two in the Northern (Finland and Canada) and
two in the Southern (Chile and the Kerguelen Islands) Hemisphere.  The model results
agree with the measurements in the absolute level within error bars, implying
that the production, decay, and lateral deposition are correctly reproduced.
The model also correctly reproduces the temporal variability of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be
concentrations on annual and sub-annual scales, including the
presence and absence of the annual cycle in the Northern and Southern Hemisphere,
respectively.  We also modeled the production and transport of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be for a
major solar energetic particle event (SPE) on 20 January 2005, which appears
insufficient to produce a measurable signal but may serve as a reference event
for historically known extreme SPEs.  Thus, a new full 3D time-dependent
model, based on CCM SOCOL, of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be atmospheric production,
transport, and deposition has been developed.  Comparison with real data
on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be concentration in the near-ground air validates the model and its
accuracy.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e352">One of the most important outer-space factors affecting Earth is related to
cosmic rays (highly energetic nuclei of extraterrestrial origin), which cause
nucleonic–electromagnetic–muon cascade in the terrestrial atmosphere
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="paren.1"/>.  These cosmic-ray-induced atmospheric cascades form the main
source of ionization in the troposphere and stratosphere
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="paren.2"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>.  Nuclear interactions between the nucleonic
component of the cascade and nuclei of atmospheric gases such as nitrogen and
oxygen can produce radioactive nuclides <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39 bib1.bibx1" id="paren.3"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>
including <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be (half-life 53.22 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be (half-life
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> years).  They are called cosmogenic isotopes since galactic
and solar cosmic rays form the dominant source of these nuclides in the
terrestrial system.  Production rates of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be vary in time
following the intensity of galactic cosmic rays (GCRs) modulated by solar
magnetic activity (the 11-year solar cycle), geomagnetic field strength, and
also sporadic solar energetic particle events (SPEs) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx67 bib1.bibx38" id="paren.4"><named-content content-type="pre">see,
e.g.,</named-content></xref>.</p>
      <p id="d1e433">The short-living cosmogenic isotope <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be, which is relatively easy to measure via
a proper collection system and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> spectrometry, is routinely measured
with daily, weekly, and monthly time resolution in near-ground air and
precipitating water at different places around the globe in the framework of
atmospheric radiation monitoring. Concentrations of long-living <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be
are measured (via acceleration mass spectrometry, AMS) in natural stratified
archives, typically in polar ice cores, with pseudo-annual or longer time
resolution <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="paren.5"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>.  In particular, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be recorded in
polar ice cores serves as a main proxy for long-term solar activity
reconstructions in the past (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59 bib1.bibx71 bib1.bibx80" id="altparen.6"/>).</p>
      <p id="d1e479">In addition to the production pattern defined by cosmic-ray fluxes,
concentrations of beryllium isotopes at any location are also affected by
atmospheric transport and deposition processes, which may essentially distort
the production signal.  Thanks to the short life of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be, high-time-resolution data, and broad distribution of the measuring sites, this isotope
has often been used as a tracer for atmospheric dynamics during the recent decades.
Its atmospheric transport can be modeled with high accuracy using the known
meteorological fields as summarized in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2"/>.  On the other
hand, data on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be are mainly measured in polar regions with low temporal
resolution and extend far back in the past to times when meteorological
data are not available. Accordingly, the atmospheric transport of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be is
typically modeled using simplified box models based on a parameterization of
some specific simulations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="paren.7"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>.  Thus, there is a need
for a realistic model able to simulate atmospheric transport and deposition of
beryllium focused in polar regions and (inter)annual timescales that is
potentially able to operate in a self-consistent mode without the prescribed
meteorology.  Such a model needs to be able to reproduce the main pattern of
beryllium transport and its deposition in polar regions on the annual timescale.</p>
      <p id="d1e516">Since measurements of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be are laborious and expensive, their coverage
for the last decades is low, making it difficult to compare model results
directly with measured data.  Moreover, they can be additionally distorted by
deposition and post-depositional processes.  However, since the two
beryllium isotopes are believed to have similar transport and deposition, being
different only in production and  lifetime, a model applied and
verified for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be transport can also be generally applied to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="paren.8"/>.  Here we develop such a model, CCM SOCOL-AERv2-BE, to trace
isotopes of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be in the atmosphere with modules for the
production, deposition, and transport of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be.</p>
      <p id="d1e587">The main purpose of this work is to present a new combined model of beryllium
production and transport and to confront its results with high-resolution
(weekly) measurements of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be in near-ground air and precipitating water in
polar regions. The isotope <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be was chosen for the analysis because of the
following reasons: (i) there are no systematic high-quality <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be data in
air samples since measurements of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be are much more difficult (AMS
technology) than those of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> spectrometry); (ii) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be
measured in ice cores contains an additional component (deposition), which also
affects the measured data and needs to be modeled separately.  On the other
hand, the model eventually aims at the modeling of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be isotope
including its deposition. Since <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be is typically measured in polar ice
cores with pseudo-annual or longer resolution, we are primarily interested in
validating the model for high-latitude regions and (inter)annual timescales.
The new model version CCM SOCOL-AERv2-BE has been developed here for
systematic modeling of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be production, transport, and
deposition in the atmosphere. This model set forms a methodological basis for
a detailed study of the atmospheric dynamic and cosmogenic isotope
distribution in the terrestrial system. The model computations were performed
with full nudging (using ERA5) to the observed meteorological data to verify
the capability of the model to trace beryllium isotopes in the atmosphere. The
model computations were directly compared with measurements of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be
isotopes in different high-latitude locations to validate the model.</p>
      <?pagebreak page7607?><p id="d1e698">The paper is organized as follows: a summary of the previous and existing models
is presented in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2"/>; data from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be measurements are
presented in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3"/>; the model is described in great detail in
Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4"/>; obtained results are discussed in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S5"/>;
validation of the model by means of comparisons with measurements is presented
in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S6"/>; Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S7"/> summarizes conclusions of the
paper.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Overview of previous and existing models</title>
      <p id="d1e731">Studies of the short-living <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be isotope and its ratio to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be provide a
precise way to probe large-scale atmospheric dynamical properties and validate
the corresponding atmospheric models
(e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56 bib1.bibx33 bib1.bibx32" id="altparen.9"/>).  For the long-living
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be isotope, different transport and deposition assumptions as well as models were
used
(e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44 bib1.bibx29 bib1.bibx61 bib1.bibx69" id="altparen.10"/>).
Here we review some key models.</p>
      <p id="d1e767">Earlier simulations with the transport model GLOMAC1 by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="text.11"/> yielded
the concentration and deposition of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be isotopes in agreement with the data
within 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. However, the authors conclude that the application of
this transport model and scavenging scheme for simulations of deposition and
concentration was not well suited for polar regions.</p>
      <p id="d1e790">Later, simulations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be transport for present and future
climatic conditions were performed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="text.12"/> with the general
circulation model MA-ECHAM4. The model successfully captured the maximum
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Be ratio in the lower polar stratosphere.</p>
      <p id="d1e834">The general ability of a full atmospheric–dynamic model to reproduce the
pattern of beryllium transport and deposition even at regional spatial and
synoptic temporal scales was demonstrated by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx72" id="text.13"/>, who used
the GISS model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="paren.14"/> to simulate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be production and transport for
the 2 months of January–February 2005 and compared the model's results with
daily-resolution near-ground <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be air concentrations measured at 11
sites worldwide (see Table 1 in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx72" id="altparen.15"/>). The results implied
that the model captures <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be transport at synoptic and longer timescales
(longer than 4–10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; see Fig. 5 in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx72" id="altparen.16"/>) in both
absolute levels and time variability. However, as noted by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="text.17"/>, the
GISS model has a low bias (a factor of two) in the upper troposphere and
lower stratosphere, while agreeing well with the surface concentrations. It was
proposed that this can be related to  model production that is too low and the fact that either
the model delivers too much <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be to the surface or does not scavenge
efficiently enough.  The GISS model was not further developed in this
direction.</p>
      <p id="d1e898">Modeling of beryllium isotopes in the Earth's atmosphere was performed
earlier using the ECHAM5-HAM atmospheric model
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27 bib1.bibx29" id="paren.18"/> and zonal mean production rates. Cosmogenic
radionuclides <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be were modeled during the Maunder Minimum
and the present-day climate <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="paren.19"/>. ECHAM5-HAM simulates
beryllium fluxes and concentrations in ice at Greenland sites well, in
agreement with the data. In Antarctica, however, the model has some
difficulties in reproducing the very low level of precipitation, which leads to
an underestimation of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be concentrations in ice. The precipitation
rate modeled at the Concordia site was a factor 2–3 too high, leading to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be concentrations in ice that are too low, since, after full depletion of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be from the
atmosphere, further rain or snow dilutes its concentration in the ice. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be
surface air concentrations generally agree within a factor of 2 with the
observed concentrations. However, modeled concentrations at two  Antarctic
stations appeared too low. This model was very roughly parameterized
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="paren.20"/>, being effectively reduced to a six-box model and not
developed further in the application to beryllium transport modeling.</p>
      <p id="d1e965">A simplified 2D model of beryllium stratospheric sedimentation was developed
by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="text.21"/> but also not supported further.</p>
      <p id="d1e971">Even though a full modeling can be done, transport of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be is typically
considered, for application purposes, with simple box–reservoir exchange
models <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52 bib1.bibx81" id="paren.22"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref> or with air-mass tracing codes
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51 bib1.bibx3" id="paren.23"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e991">In chemical transport models, wind and temperature values are taken from
either (1) general circulation models or from (2) meteorological data. The
advantage of the second approach is that chemical transport simulations are
linked to real meteorology and the results are inherently compared to
observations. Reanalysis extends meteorological data to the past. This allows
us to perform long-term simulations which show temporal evolution of the
atmosphere's composition. The success of such a task relies on the reanalysis
quality, i.e., on the accuracy of the indicator's distributions. This also
makes chemical transfer models a powerful tool for evaluating the reanalyses
themselves <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="paren.24"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e997">The Global Modeling Initiative (GMI) chemistry and transport model (a model with
prescribed meteorology) driven by NASA's MERRA assimilated meteorological data
was applied to understand the roles of transport and precipitation scavenging
processes using the cosmogenic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be tracer <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="paren.25"/>. The model results
agree reasonably well with the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be data in general but diverge by a factor
of 2 for warm periods.  The discrepancy was ascribed to the model's insufficiently
detailed spatial sampling.</p>
      <p id="d1e1021">The approach based on prescribed meteorology is applicable only to recent
years when the wind field is known; moreover, it includes neither
stratospheric dynamics nor depositional processes and is therefore not
suitable for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be in polar ice.</p>
      <?pagebreak page7608?><p id="d1e1034">Thus, several models of different complexity and accuracy have been developed
in the recent past to model transport and deposition of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be. However, due to the lack of support for  radionuclide
simulations with the ECHAM-HAM <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="paren.26"/> and GISS <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="paren.27"/> climate
models, a full working model capable of simulating production, transport, and
deposition of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be from all sources is presently
missing. The model should be “user-friendly” (i.e., for a user
without  deep knowledge of climate modeling) and applicable for  past or
future projections when direct nudging to the meteorological reanalysis data
is not possible.</p>
      <p id="d1e1080">Here we present a new version of CCM SOCOL – CCM SOCOL-AERv2-BE – for modeling
of production, transport, and deposition of the cosmogenic isotopes of
beryllium as well as its validation with the available measurements of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be
at high-latitude locations.  CCM SOCOL is potentially capable of
simulating the beryllium transport and deposition and was already used
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx61 bib1.bibx69" id="paren.28"/> for the estimation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be
deposition after major solar energetic particle (SPE) events, but it did not
include the state-of-the-art interactive parameterization of the wet and dry
deposition introduced recently <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="paren.29"/>. A recent model version of CCM
SOCOL that simulates aerosols more realistically, however, does not include
the treatment of all processes relevant to the beryllium life cycle, and its
applicability has not been evaluated.  We have further upgraded CCM SOCOL
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="paren.30"/> here by adding the production, transport, and deposition
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be isotopes from both GCRs and SPEs.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Data on ${}^{7}$Be measurements}?><title>Data on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be measurements</title>
      <p id="d1e1147">For the model verification, we used data on the measured activity
(concentration) of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be isotope in near-ground air, with weekly sampling
(corrected for the decay) performed in different hemispheres for the
period 2002–2008. Higher-time-resolution data are not necessary for several
reasons: (i) data availability, since weekly sampling is a standard resolution
for most <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be-measuring stations; (ii) inability of full atmospheric–dynamic
models to catch the sub-synoptic timescales because of the rough grid size
(see <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29 bib1.bibx73" id="altparen.31"/>); and (iii) focus on longer timescales
(annual and interannual) for the application to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be in ice cores. On
the other hand, rougher-resolution data (e.g., monthly or quarterly) are more
uncertain because of the decay of short-living <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be. Thus, we found the
weekly-resolution data to be optimal for our purposes.</p>
      <p id="d1e1189">Traditionally, for short-living isotopes, the measured quantity is not
concentration but activity in units of becquerels (number of radioactive
decays per second) per  cubic meter of air (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Bq</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), as directly measured by a
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> spectrometer.  Correction for decay between the times of sample
collection and measurement is standardly performed (see <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="altparen.32"/>).
The activity and concentration can be easily translated to each other using
the known lifetime of the isotope.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e1222">List of stations whose data were used for the present study.
Data sources are the Finnish National Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority (STUK), the
Radiation Protection Bureau of Health Canada (RPBHC), and the Comprehensive Nuclear Test-Ban-Treaty Organization (CTBTO).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Station name</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Region</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Location</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Source</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Time interval</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ivalo</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Finland</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">68<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>39<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>09<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N 27<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>32<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>47<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">STUK</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2002–2008</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Rovaniemi</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Finland</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">66<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>05<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N 25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>44<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>05<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">STUK</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2002–2008</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Kajaani</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Finland</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">64<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>13<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N 27<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>44<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">STUK</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2002–2008</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Kotka</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Finland</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">60<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>28<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N 26<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>56<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>45<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">STUK</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2002–2008</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Yellowknife</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Canada</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">62<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>26<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>32<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N 114<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>23<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>51<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">RPBHC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2003–2008</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Kerguelen island</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Port-aux-Français, France</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">49<inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>21<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S 70<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>13<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">CTBTO</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2006–2008</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Punta Arenas</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Chile</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">53<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>09<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S 70<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>55<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">CTBTO</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2006–2008</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e1744">Here we use data from four nearly antipodal high-latitude locations (see
Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>).  Two locations are in the Northern Hemisphere in Finland
(a set of stations) and Canada (Yellowknife), and two are in the Southern
Hemisphere: Kerguelen island (French) and Punta Arenas (Chile).  The
longitudinal separation between the locations in each hemisphere is greater
than 140<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.  The data series are shown in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>  and described below.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e1762">Datasets of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be activity in the near-ground air used in this study, including
(panels <bold>a</bold> through <bold>d</bold>, respectively) Finland (a composite of four stations),
Yellowknife (Canada), Punta Arenas (Chile), and Kerguelen island (France) – see detailed information in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>.
The measured and modeled activities are shown as solid red and dashed blue curves, respectively.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/14/7605/2021/gmd-14-7605-2021-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e1788">Finnish data on the measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be activity were provided for the period
2002–2008 by the Finnish National Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority
(STUK) for four sites (see Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>): Ivalo, Rovaniemi, Kajaani,
and Kotka, spanning meridionally 8<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in latitude.  The isotope of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be was collected on air filters using a high-volume air sampler on a
weekly basis, and then its activity was measured with an HPGe (high-purity
germanium) detector inside a 4 in. thick lead shielding in the STUK
laboratory.  The statistical measurement uncertainty is
3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  (see a detailed description of the sampling
and measurement procedure in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="altparen.33"/>).  The data from the four stations
were combined as the average of the four locations for each time interval to
represent a regional-scale dataset, as shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>a.</p>
      <?pagebreak page7609?><p id="d1e1842">We also used <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be data from the Yellowknife site (Canada; see
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>b) kindly provided by the Radiation Protection Bureau of
Health Canada.  The original data are with daily time resolution but have been
combined into weekly samples (correction for decay applied) for consistency
with other datasets.  The total uncertainty for the measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be activity
is defined mostly by statistics and is approximately
7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e1881">For the Southern Hemisphere, we considered weekly <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be activities measured
at Punta Arenas (Chile, CTBTO station code CLP18).  During 2002–2006, the
data contain many long breaks (about half of weekly data are missing), and hence
we considered data since October 2006 only, as shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>c.</p>
      <p id="d1e1896">Another Southern Hemisphere station is located at Port-aux-Français,
Kerguelen island (CTBT station code FRP30), with data available since 2006
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>d).  The data for Punta Arenas and Kerguelen island were
obtained via the virtual Data Exploration Centre (vDEC) of the Preparatory
Commission for the Comprehensive Nuclear Test-Ban-Treaty Organization (CTBTO).  A
full description of the sampling and measurement of the CTBTO data is
available elsewhere <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46 bib1.bibx45" id="paren.34"/>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e1906">Quarterly total deposition of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be at northern Finland stations (Ivalo and Rovaniemi)
for the period 2002–2008.
The blue dashed line represents the total modeled deposition, while the red line depicts the measured data.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/14/7605/2021/gmd-14-7605-2021-f02.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e1924">In addition to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be activity measured in near-ground air, we also exploited
data on the quarterly total-deposition <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be measurements (without separating
dry and wet depositions) measured in collected precipitation water at
Rovaniemi and Ivalo stations, as provided by STUK.  The fallout sample
collection period was 1 month, but the three samples were combined together
to form a quarterly sample.  Hence, the four measured samples for each year
cover the period of January to March, April to June, July to September, and October
to December.  The reference date was set to the middle of the
sampling period (since the decay time of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be is shorter than the sampling
interval) and the activities were decay-corrected to this date
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="paren.35"><named-content content-type="pre">see</named-content></xref>.  The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be deposition averaged over the two
locations is shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Model description</title>
      <p id="d1e1979">We used an extended version of  CCM SOCOL <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="paren.36"/> with the aerosol
module – AERv2 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="paren.37"/>. This version consists of the general
circulation model MA-ECHAM5 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="paren.38"/> and the atmospheric chemistry module
MEZON <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="paren.39"/> combined with an aerosol module AER
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx77" id="paren.40"/>, interacting with each other every 2 h of modeling. In this study, MA-ECHAM5 is nudged with fifth-generation ECMWF
atmospheric reanalysis data from the global climate ERA5 (eraiaT42L39)
reanalyses. The chemical part of the MEZON core includes 56 chemical species
of oxygen, hydrogen, nitrogen, carbon, chlorine, bromine, and sulfur groups,
295 gas-phase reactions, 64 photolysis reactions, and 16 heterogeneous
reactions on stratospheric aqueous sulfuric acid aerosols as well as three
types of polar stratospheric clouds.  CCM SOCOL-AERv2-BE uses the horizontal
resolution T42, where T refers to triangular truncation and the number
denotes the series of spherical harmonics.  The horizontal resolution is about
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.8</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.8</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">300</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">300</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the
equatorial region).  The vertical grid is defined using a sigma-hybrid
coordinate system, which is calculated by a linear combination of surface
pressure and constant coefficients that define the vertical coordinate.  The
model has 39 vertical levels between the Earth's surface and the
0.01 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> level (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">80</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The real orography is
smoothed over the model grid cells.  The aerosol module exploits a sectional
microphysical scheme whereby the aerosol particle size distribution is
represented by 40 discrete size bins.  The model simulates the advective
transport of stratospheric aerosol by the Brewer–Dobson large-scale
circulation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="paren.41"/> and gravitational sedimentation.  We have made
some adaptations<?pagebreak page7610?> of the main model to focus on beryllium transport, as
described below.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Production rates of ${}^{7}$Be}?><title>Production rates of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be</title>
      <p id="d1e2087">Production of both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be was computed using the CRAC : Be
(Cosmic Ray Atmospheric Cascade: application to Beryllium) model
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54" id="paren.42"/>, which is the most recent and accurate model of cosmogenic
isotope production.  This model simulates, using the GEANT4 Monte Carlo
simulation tool <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="paren.43"/>, the full
nucleonic–muon–electromagnetic cascade induced by primary cosmic-ray
particles in the atmosphere.  This model is an essential upgrade of the
previous versions of the CRAC : Be model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx67 bib1.bibx38" id="paren.44"/>
based on the CORSIKA simulation tool <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="paren.45"/>.  The CRAC model presents
a set of accurately computed yield functions of production of cosmogenic
isotopes for different primary particle types, energy, and atmospheric
depths.  By a numerical integration above the local geomagnetic rigidity
cutoff <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="paren.46"/> of the product of the yield function and the known (or
assumed) energy spectrum of primary cosmic rays (of either GCR or SPE origin),
one can obtain the isotope's production rate as a function of location (via
the geomagnetic rigidity cutoff), atmospheric height (via the yield function),
and time (via the time-variable energy spectrum).  These production rates,
computed for each location and with hourly temporal time resolution, were used
as input for CCM SOCOL-AERv2-BE, providing a 3D <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> time source of the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be in the atmosphere.</p>
      <p id="d1e2149">Production due to galactic cosmic rays (GCRs), which always bombard the Earth
with slightly variable intensity due to solar modulation, was computed by
applying the force-field model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="paren.47"/> with the modulation potential
reconstructed from the World Neutron Monitor Network <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx75" id="paren.48"/>.
The geomagnetic field was taken according to the International Geomagnetic
Reference Field model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="paren.49"><named-content content-type="pre">IGRF;</named-content></xref> in the eccentric dipole
approximation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19 bib1.bibx74" id="paren.50"/>.  While GCRs are always present
near Earth, sporadic solar particle events (SPEs) take place occasionally
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx76 bib1.bibx12" id="paren.51"/> and can be sufficiently strong to be recorded by
ground-based neutron monitors <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57 bib1.bibx70" id="paren.52"/>.  A large
number of cosmogenic isotopes can be produced during such events
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx69" id="paren.53"/>, which can be several orders of magnitude stronger on
the multimillennial timescale than for the last decades covered by direct
observations, with strong signals in the polar <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be concentrations
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx61" id="paren.54"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>.  To model the contribution of severe SPEs, we
modeled the production of beryllium by the SPE on 20 January 2005 (GLE no. 69),
which was the strongest event during the studied period (1996–2008) and the
second strongest directly observed (1951–2020).  The same yield function and
geomagnetic cutoff approach as for GCR were applied along with the SPE
energy spectrum obtained for this event by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="text.55"/>.  To study the
possible effect of seasonality on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be transport we
simulated the same SPE event as if it occurred not only on its actual date in
midwinter (20 January 2005) but also mid-spring, summer, and autumn
(20 April, 20 July, and 20 October 2005, respectively).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e2214">Zonal mean production of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be in the Northern Hemisphere as a function of geographical latitude and the  model's atmospheric pressure level.
<bold>(a)</bold> Daily production by GCRs averaged over the period of 2002–2008.
The color scale (on the right) is given in units of atoms per day per degree of latitude per gram per square centimeter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).
<bold>(b)</bold> Total production by SPE on 20 January 2005.
The color scale is in units of atoms per degree of latitude per gram per square centimeter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/14/7605/2021/gmd-14-7605-2021-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2273">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/> shows the zonal mean production of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be as a function
of the atmospheric pressure and northern geographical latitude from two
sources: daily GCRs (panel a) and SPEs (panel b).  Since the duration of a
strong SPE takes several hours, we compare it with the daily production of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be by GCR.  One can see that the polar stratospheric production due to SPE
grossly overwhelms that by the daily GCR flux, but it fades towards tropical
latitudes.  Since the production of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be is nearly symmetric between the
global hemispheres, as defined by the geomagnetic shielding, only the Northern
Hemisphere is shown.  Even though the production rate is significantly higher
in the polar region, its contribution to the global production is not
dominant because of the small area of the polar regions.  For the GCR-related
production, the dominant production region is located in the middle- to high-latitude
(40–70<inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) stratosphere and upper troposphere (above 400 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
level or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).  Production of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be by SPEs is confined to
the polar (latitude <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">55</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) upper stratosphere and mesosphere (above
50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> level or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).  Hardly any beryllium nuclei
are produced by SPEs in the tropical region.  In all cases, the<?pagebreak page7611?> maximum of
production lies at middle to high latitudes in the stratosphere, and the production
decreases towards the surface because of the increasing atmospheric depth
and equatorward due to the geomagnetic shielding.  Because of the much softer
energy spectrum, SPEs produce <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be at shallower atmospheric depths and
higher latitudes than GCRs do.  The production pattern for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be is similar
to that for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be but with smaller absolute values.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Decay of ${}^{{7}}$Be}?><title>Decay of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be</title>
      <p id="d1e2440"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be is a short-living isotope whose decay cannot be neglected in comparison
with the typical transport and deposition time, especially in the stratosphere, in
contrast to the long-living <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be isotope.  Accordingly, a standard decay
probability of 0.054 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> per hour (corresponding to the isotope's mean
half-life of 53.22 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was applied during tracing of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be in a way
similar to that used by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="text.56"/> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">222</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Rn.  No decay needs to
be applied to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be for this kind of modeling.  Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>
shows the modeled global content of the two beryllium isotopes in the
atmosphere after an instant production by the SPE event on 20 January 2005
(day zero).  One can see that the amount of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be decreases nearly
exponentially, reflecting a slow removal of the isotope through precipitation.
The typical time of the isotope removal is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Be</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">550</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, implying a residence time of a few years  (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="altparen.57"/>). This time is comparable to the 1–2-year atmospheric
residence time of other isotopes (e.g., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">241</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Am) defined
after nuclear weapon tests <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="paren.58"/>.  The decrease in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be isotope
concentration is much faster and nearly perfectly exponential with
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Be</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">72</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which includes both decay and
removal.  Since the removal process is assumed to be identical for both
isotopes, the concentrations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be can be used to correct the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be
decay for the system effects.  The decay time of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be estimated in this
way is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Be</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Be</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">82</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is generally consistent with the expected <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-folding
lifetime of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be of 77 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, implying that the decay was accounted for
correctly in the model.  Thus, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be isotope is fully removed from the
atmosphere, mostly due to decay, within several months.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e2748">Computed global mean columnar content of two beryllium isotopes, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be, produced by SPE on 20 January 2005 (day zero) as a function of time.
The nearly exponential decay of the concentration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">550</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">72</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be, respectively) includes both
decay and sink (deposition) of the isotopes.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/14/7605/2021/gmd-14-7605-2021-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <label>4.3</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Transport of cosmogenic isotopes ${}^{7}$Be and ${}^{{10}}$Be}?><title>Transport of cosmogenic isotopes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be</title>
      <p id="d1e2865">Beryllium atoms are captured by different aerosols in the air that can enhance
or suppress its transport by gravitational sedimentation. Since the typical
size of aerosol particles is less than 0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="paren.59"/>,
with a modal value of 0.05 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the corresponding gravitational
sedimentation velocity ranges between 200 and 1000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and does
not play an important role in the lower stratosphere, where it is much smaller
than the vertical wind speed  (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx78 bib1.bibx82" id="altparen.60"/>). The role
of gravitational sedimentation was evaluated by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="text.61"/> using
numerical experiments with a 2D model, which includes detailed sulfate aerosol
microphysics. By comparing no-gravitational-sedimentation and reference model
runs, they concluded that “sedimentation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be atoms does not
seem to play an important role in removing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be out of the stratosphere,
because radioactive decay and transport are faster processes”.  The marginal
importance of gravitational settling and identical transport of isotopes in
gas and aerosol forms was also described in the seminal work of
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="text.62"/>. It should be noted that we treat <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be as a passive tracer
only for the advective transport when the result is the same for the small
particles and gas components.</p>
      <p id="d1e2945">Different processes such as stratospheric mixing, stratosphere–troposphere
exchange, and tropospheric transport and deposition are realistically modeled by
CCM SOCOL <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="paren.63"/>.  In this study, the advective transport of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be as passive tracers was performed using flux-form
semi-Lagrangian transport schemes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="paren.64"/> embedded in ECHAM5.</p>
      <p id="d1e2972">Beryllium is also transported vertically by deep, shallow, and mid-level convective motions. The transport is defined
by the convective mass fluxes of the standard grid-box ECHAM5 convection scheme described by  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64" id="text.65"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="text.66"/>.
The transport parameterization by mixing in the boundary layer is based on the eddy diffusion method, and the vertical turbulent fluxes are
related to the gradient of the considered quantity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58" id="paren.67"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS4">
  <label>4.4</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Deposition of {${}^{7}$Be and ${}^{{10}}$Be}}?><title>Deposition of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be</title>
      <p id="d1e3012">Dry deposition is typically modeled using a simplified approach that assumes
constant dry deposition velocities over land and ocean, without accounting for
seasonal or geographical variability.  The tropospheric washout of gases can
be calculated by using a constant removal rate, irrespective of precipitation
occurrence <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="paren.68"/>.  CCM SOCOL-AERv2-BE employs a more
sophisticated scheme based on the surface resistance approach for the
estimation of dry deposition velocities <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx79" id="paren.69"/>.  Deposition<?pagebreak page7612?> of
beryllium isotopes is parameterized as a function of surface properties,
solubility, and reactivity of the considered species <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="paren.70"/>.  These
properties for the modeled beryllium are identical to those for small sulfate
aerosols. It means that beryllium atoms are considered  passive tracers only
for the transport process, while with respect to the dry and wet deposition,
they are treated as sulfates.  The applied dry deposition scheme also
considers the actual meteorological conditions and different surface types.</p>
      <p id="d1e3024">The interactive wet deposition scheme used in CCM SOCOL-AERv2-BE exploits the
EAYSY2 version of the Scavenging (SCAV) submodule in the ECHAM/MESSy
Atmospheric Chemistry (EMAC) model.  A detailed description of the interactive
wet deposition scheme is presented and discussed elsewhere
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35 bib1.bibx65 bib1.bibx66" id="paren.71"/>. The parameterization is based on the
model-generated available liquid water in (cloud water content) and below
(precipitating water) clouds as well as uptake and release form droplets, which depends
on the concentration and solubility of the considered species.  Scavenging
coefficients for all tracers are calculated based on Henry's law equilibrium
constants.  The Henry constants for beryllium are considered identical to
those of small sulfate aerosols.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS5">
  <label>4.5</label><title>Setup of numerical experiments</title>
      <p id="d1e3038">Since <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be is removed from the stratosphere via
stratosphere–troposphere exchange and the stratospheric mixing time is long (a
few years), we have performed a 6-year spin-up of the model for the period
1996–2001 to allow <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be to reach equilibrium conditions.  For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be,
such a long spin-up is not needed since it is mostly removed from the
atmosphere by decay, but we kept it similar to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be for consistency.
After the spin-up period, we initiated a 7-year (2002–2008) run with full
nudging (a linear relaxation of thermodynamic parameters: temperature,
divergence, and vorticity of the wind field).  In this way, we can validate
the model by comparing the results with the measurements.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <label>5</label><title>Modeling results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS1">
  <label>5.1</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Global patterns of ${}^{7}$Be transport and deposition}?><title>Global patterns of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be transport and deposition</title>
      <p id="d1e3104">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/> shows the zonal mean concentration of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be averaged
over the boreal summer and winter for 2002–2008, as modeled
here. While the isotope production is symmetric between the hemispheres, the
concentrations are not completely symmetric and depend on the large-scale
circulation patterns, which are different in the summer and winter hemispheres
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx62" id="paren.72"/>. The stratospheric meridional transport is driven by forces
from the breaking planetary, synoptic-scale, and gravity waves. Stratospheric
air ascends inside the so-called tropical pipe and then moves poleward,
descending at middle and high latitudes, predominantly in the winter
hemisphere where a more intensive stratosphere–troposphere exchange leads to
slightly smaller concentrations of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be in the stratosphere during the
cold seasons. Lower-stratospheric air descends relatively fast over the middle
latitudes at which the stratosphere–troposphere exchange is fast, while at high
latitudes it resides longer in the lower stratosphere <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="paren.73"/>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e3135">Modeled zonal mean concentrations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be during the boreal winter <bold>(a)</bold>
and boreal summer <bold>(b)</bold> averaged over 2002–2008.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/14/7605/2021/gmd-14-7605-2021-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e3162">Lambert equal-area cylindrical projection map of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be total (wet and dry) deposition averaged over the period of 2002–2008.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/14/7605/2021/gmd-14-7605-2021-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3180">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/> presents distributions of the total (wet and dry)
deposition of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be averaged over 2002–2008.  The deposition is low in arid
regions, e.g., the Sahara and the Middle East.  It is also low to the west of
the continents, following the low precipitation above the cold ocean currents.
The precipitation rate is the highest in the tropical convection zone due to
the highest temperature gradients and strong convection in the equatorial
area.  The deposition, however, is not very high at low latitudes because both
the production rate and the downward transport of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be are low in the
tropics.  It is important that gradients of the deposition can be strong even
on the regional scale, suggesting that meteorological processes can strongly
influence beryllium deposition at any given location
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx73" id="paren.74"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>.  This pattern agrees well with a similar
previous study <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="paren.75"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS2">
  <label>5.2</label><title>The effect of a strong SPE</title>
      <?pagebreak page7613?><p id="d1e3219">While GCRs always bombard the Earth's atmosphere with slightly variable
intensity, major SPEs make a different impact, producing sporadic and short
(typically several hours) but very intense fluxes of energetic particles
entering the atmosphere mostly in polar regions.  Potentially, extreme SPEs that are
orders of magnitude stronger than those observed during the recent decades
can be recorded in cosmogenic isotope data
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx68 bib1.bibx69 bib1.bibx48" id="paren.76"/>, and a proper model is
needed to study them <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx61" id="paren.77"/>.  Here we modeled transport of such
SPE-produced beryllium based on the strong SPE on 20 January 2005.  In order
to distinguish between different sources, we traced five beryllium tracers for
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be isotope: one for GCR-produced beryllium and four tracers for the
SPE scenarios as described above.</p>
      <p id="d1e3237">Production of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be isotope during this SPE (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>b)
appears mostly in the polar stratosphere and lower mesosphere.  After
production, the isotope starts decaying and being transported by the air
dynamic.  Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/> shows an example of the SPE-produced
isotope concentration on the 30th day after the event (19 February 2005).  One
can see that the production pattern is smeared by the transport, leading in
particular to an essential hemispheric difference.  It is interesting that
tropospheric concentrations are higher at middle and low latitudes of about
30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> than in polar regions because of the atmospheric circulation. As
an example, the modeled activity of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be in near-ground air is shown in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/> as averaged over Finland.  The locally (polar
troposphere) produced beryllium dominates during the first 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after
the event, but then the transport starts playing a role, leading to the very
low concentration during the subsequent period.  The level of activity for
this event in the near-air in Finland is very low: a factor 30–100
lower than the typical level of activity due to GCRs during the winter season
(see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>a).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e3286">Distribution of the concentrations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be produced by the SPE on
20 January 2005 shown on 19 February 2005,  30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after the event.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/14/7605/2021/gmd-14-7605-2021-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e3315">Modeled activity of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be produced by the SPE on 20 January 2005 in near-ground air in Finland.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/14/7605/2021/gmd-14-7605-2021-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3333">Although the SPE on 20 January 2005 was a very strong one (the second-strongest directly observed), its imprint in cosmogenic isotopes is not
detectable on the background of air transport dynamic and GCR variability.  An
SPE must be stronger by a factor of 10 or more than this one to become
detectable in isotope records even on the daily scale
(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx61 bib1.bibx69" id="altparen.78"/>).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{9}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d1e3341">Polar (at 85<inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N latitude) mean concentration of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be in the Northern Hemisphere for SPEs occurring in different seasons.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/14/7605/2021/gmd-14-7605-2021-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?pagebreak page7614?><p id="d1e3368">The transport of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be after production may differ for
different seasons.  In order to study that, we simulated the same SPE on
20 January 2005 as if it occurred in mid-spring (20 April 2005), midsummer
(20 July 2005), and mid-autumn (20 October 2005).  Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>
shows the concentration of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be in the Northern Hemisphere (85<inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
latitude) for these cases.  Here we consider <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be because of the fast
decay of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be, which smears the time variability of the concentration.  The
most pronounced and long-lasting effect occurs from the SPE taking place
during the autumn (panel d) when a strong concentration of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be persists
in the stratospheric region for about 1 year and gradually decreases after
that for a few more years.  The patterns of the SPE occurring during summer
(panel c) and spring (panel b)  are similar to each other in that it
has a shorter residence time (only a few months) and a smaller spread of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be.  The winter scenario suggests somewhat faster removal of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be
from the atmosphere, but it also stays in the upper atmosphere for several
years.  The concentration in near-ground air is mostly defined by the seasonal
cycle and is consistent between different scenarios of the SPE occurrence
date.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6">
  <label>6</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Evaluation of the model by comparison with direct ${}^{7}$Be measurements}?><title>Evaluation of the model by comparison with direct <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be measurements</title>
      <p id="d1e3474">In this section, we validate the model by comparing the simulation results
with actual measurements of the near-ground-air <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be concentration in air
filters performed in boreal and austral high-latitude regions
(Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3"/>), as shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e3490">First, we compared the modeled <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be activity with the measured one for the
all-Finland record, which was compiled from four stations (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3"/>) as
shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>a.  The linear Pearson correlation between the
modeled and measured weekly series is highly significant at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.68</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).  The standard correlation analysis does not
distinguish between different frequencies and/or timescales.  Therefore, we show in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/> the global wavelet coherence, which is an analog of the
correlation coefficient but extending it into the frequency domain between
the modeled and measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be activities.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10"><?xmltex \currentcnt{10}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d1e3559">Global wavelet coherence (Morlet base, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) between modeled and measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be activity for the four
locations considered here.
The red dashed line denotes the 95 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> confidence level against the AR(1) red noise.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/14/7605/2021/gmd-14-7605-2021-f10.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e3598">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/> depicts the coherence for the Finnish stations.  The
coherence is highly significant (confidence level above 95 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) at all
timescales between 1 month and 2 years.  Although there are discrepancies
on the very short timescales related to synoptic noise, the model
correctly reproduces some strong spikes in the beryllium activity, such as earlier
in 2003, which are often related to sudden stratospheric warming
(SSW) events <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52 bib1.bibx4" id="paren.79"/>.  It is important that the
long-term variability (at an annual timescale) is correctly reproduced by the
model.</p>
      <p id="d1e3614">However, neither correlation coefficient nor coherence analyses provide
information on the absolute level match between the series.  In order to
assess possible model biases we considered the difference between the modeled
and measured weekly <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be concentrations as shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>a.
The difference is insignificant at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.16</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mBq</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, implying the
absence of a systematic bias in the model. The mean (averaged over seven
yearly values) level of the modeled activity (2.05 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mBq</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is
close to the measured one (1.86 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mBq</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), within 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(the difference is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.19</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.19</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mBq</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).  The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> test suggests
that this difference is insignificant.  On the other hand, there is an
essential difference between the model and the measurements regarding the
magnitude of summer peaks in 2007 and 2008.  It could potentially be related
to the local atmospheric aerosol properties, but the AERONET (AErosol RObotic
NETwork) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="paren.80"/> station in Sodankylä (northern Finland) did not
show any anomalies for that time.  The discrepancies appear during warm
periods, in agreement with other direct models <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="paren.81"/>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F11" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{11}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 11</label><caption><p id="d1e3745">Histograms of the difference between modeled and measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be weekly concentrations (blue and red curves
in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>, respectively) for the four locations analyzed here (see Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>).
Red curves depict the best-fit Gaussians whose parameters (the mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and standard deviation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)
are quantified in the legends.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/14/7605/2021/gmd-14-7605-2021-f11.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?pagebreak page7615?><p id="d1e3781">For the Canadian station, the agreement between the modeled and measured
activities (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>b) is nearly perfect, including a correct
reproduction of the very strong seasonal cycle and sudden short spikes,
e.g., in late 2003.  The Pearson correlation coefficient is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.78</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).  The coherence between the simulated and measured
datasets (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>b) is highly significant at all timescales
between 1 month and 1.5 years.  The difference between the modeled and
measured concentrations is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.25</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mBq</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>b). The overall mean level of modeled activity
(2.15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mBq</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is close to the measured one
(2.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mBq</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), within 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (the difference is
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.24</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.22</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mBq</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).  The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> test suggests that the difference
is insignificant, implying the absence of the model bias. The most pronounced
difference between the model and the measurements was observed in 2008.</p>
      <p id="d1e3940">The Chilean data (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>c) depict reasonable agreement between
the model and the measurements.  Since the data contain no seasonal pattern,
as correctly reproduced by the model, the formal correlation is insignificant at
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.06</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.  However, it is dominated by the short-term variability, while the
wavelet coherence analysis (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>c) suggests that the two
datasets are significantly coherent at timescales longer than 3 months.  The
difference between the modeled and measured concentrations is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.06</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.68</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mBq</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>c). The mean levels of the
modeled and measured series agree nearly perfectly, within 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>:
1.74 vs. 1.71 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mBq</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the modeled and measured
activities, respectively, implying the absence of bias.</p>
      <p id="d1e4017">Data from Kerguelen island (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>d) also depict
reasonable agreement, including correctly reproduced spikes and the lack of an
annual cycle.  Similar to the Chilean data, the formal correlation is
insignificant at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.06</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, but the coherence (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>d) is highly
significant at monthly and annual timescales.  The difference between the
modeled and measured concentrations is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.33</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mBq</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>d). The mean levels of the modeled and measured series
are reasonably matched, with a difference of 18 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>:  2.02
vs. 1.65 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mBq</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the modeled and measured activities,
respectively, also indicating no significant bias.  The observed small
systematic discrepancy may be related to the peculiarity of this site, which is
located on a small island (about 100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> across) in the middle of the
ocean, while the model grid (about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">300</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">300</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) may be too
rough to catch the actual orography.</p>
      <p id="d1e4121">Therefore, we conclude that the model correctly (within 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
calculates the mean levels of beryllium concentration for both northern and
southern high-latitude locations and contains no biases, at least for the
locations where the orographic scale is comparable to the model's grid size,
but it may have larger uncertainties for unresolvable spatial scales.  It is
important that the model correctly reproduces the seasonal variability or its
absence as well as some sudden spikes, particularly during the late winter and
spring seasons, likely related to SSW events.</p>
      <?pagebreak page7616?><p id="d1e4132">In addition to the concentration of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be in the near-surface air (expressed
in measured activity), we also compared the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be deposition modeled by
CCM SOCOL-AERv2-BE with that measured in northern Finland, as shown in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>.  The agreement is very good: the average levels (183 and
188 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Bq</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the modeled and measured data, respectively) agree
within 2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the correlation is highly significant
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.86</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.06</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.04</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).  However, while the overall agreement
is very good, the discrepancy can be significant for individual years.  Thus,
we conclude that the model also reproduces the depositional
flux of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be reasonably well on the yearly timescale.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S7" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>7</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e4239">A full 3D transient model of production, transport, and deposition of
cosmogenic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be isotopes in the atmosphere has been developed.
The model, named CCM SOCOL-AERv2-BE, is based on  CCM SOCOL, specifically
tuned for the best performance in tracing beryllium, and the CRAC production
model.  Realistic modeling of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be isotope was performed for the years
2002–2008, with a 5-year model spin-up during 1996–2001.  The measured
weekly concentrations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be in near-ground air have been compared with the
model prediction for four nearly antipodal high-latitude locations: two in the
Northern (Finland and Canada) and two in the Southern (Chile and Kerguelen island)
Hemisphere.  The model results generally agree well with the measurements in
the absolute level within error bars, implying that the production, decay, and
lateral deposition are correctly reproduced by the model.  However, a larger
discrepancy (up to 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was observed at  Kerguelen island where
the orographic scale is much smaller than the model grid size.  The model
correctly reproduces the temporal variability of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be concentrations on the
annual and sub-annual scales, including a good reproduction of the annual
cycle, which dominates data in the Northern Hemisphere, and the absence of
such a cycle in the Southern Hemisphere. In addition, occasional anomalous
events such as SSWs are well reproduced by the model.  This validates the
newly developed model to be able to correctly simulate the production,
transport, and deposition of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be (and hence, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be) isotope on
local or regional spatial (in high-latitude regions) and monthly or annual temporal
scales.  The modeled <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be distribution is also in general agreement with
earlier computations based on a similar approach
(e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27 bib1.bibx17" id="altparen.82"/>).</p>
      <p id="d1e4326">We have also modeled the production and transport of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be for a major solar
energetic particle event on 20 January 2005, which was one of the largest
directly observed events.  It was shown that, at minimum, an order-of-magnitude stronger event is needed to become observable in the beryllium data.</p>
      <p id="d1e4338">Concluding, the new full 3D time-dependent CCM SOCOL-AERv2-BE model of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be atmospheric production, transport, and deposition has been developed
and validated using directly measured data.  The model is recommended to be
used in studies related to, e.g., atmospheric dynamical patterns, extreme
solar particle storms, long-term solar activity reconstruction from cosmogenic
proxy data, and solar–terrestrial relations.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e4364">The data from CTBTO are available free upon request at
<uri>https://www.ctbto.org/specials/vdec/vdec-request-for-access</uri> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="paren.83"/>.  According to the EU's iNSPIRE directive, STUK
provides measurement data connected to geospatial information free of
charge. The data from STUK are available at
<uri>https://www.stuk.fi/avoin-data</uri> and
<uri>https://www.stuk.fi/avoin-data/ohjeet</uri> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="paren.84"/>.  Data from the Radiation Protection Bureau of Health Canada are
available free upon request via
<uri>https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/corporate/contact-us/radiation-protection-bureau.html</uri> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55" id="paren.85"/>.  CCM SOCOL-AERv2-BE is available at Zenodo:
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5006356" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.5006356</ext-link> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="paren.86"/>.  ERA5 data are available on the Copernicus
Climate Change Service (C3S) Climate Data Store at
<uri>https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/#!/search?text=ERA5&amp;type=dataset</uri> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="paren.87"/>.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e4404">All authors participated in the model development,
verification, discussions about the results, and revisions to the article. IU,
GK, and ER designed the main ideas of this study, and KG carried them out. KG was
supervised directly by ER and TS during the model code improvement work. APL
found and prepared the real beryllium data for the model verification. IU and
KG were responsible for data processing and figure preparation. IU prepared the paper.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e4410">The contact author has declared that neither they nor their co-authors have any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d1e4416">The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the CTBTO Preparatory Commission.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e4425">The authors would like to thank Weihua Zhang, Ian Hoffman, and Kurt Ungar of the Radiation Protection Bureau of Health Canada for providing the Yellowknife data.
The authors acknowledge the work of CTBTO staff as well as the CL18 and FRP30 station operating staff for producing and providing the corresponding data under a vDEC agreement  (<uri>https://www.ctbto.org/specials/vdec/</uri>, last access: 1 September 2021).</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e4434">This research has been supported by the Academy of Finland (ESPERA (grant no. 321882)), the Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen
Forschung (grant nos. 200021-169241 (VEC) and 200020-182239 (POLE)), and the Russian
Science Foundation (RSF project no. 20-67-46016). Kseniia Golubenko has been granted a
scholarship by the Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia (grant no. 2021; the Vilho, Yrjö,<?pagebreak page7617?> and Kalle Väisälä Foundation). Timofei Sukhodolov worked on the model development as part of the SPbSU “Ozone Layer and Upper Atmosphere Research laboratory” activity supported by the Government of the Russian Federation (grant no. 075-15-2021-583).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e4440">This paper was edited by Josef Koller and reviewed by four anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{Beer et~al.(2012)}?><label>Beer et al.(2012)</label><?label beer12?><mixed-citation>
Beer, J., McCracken, K., and von Steiger, R.: Cosmogenic Radionuclides: Theory and Applications in the Terrestrial and Space Environments, Springer, Berlin, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{Brattich et~al.(2017)}?><label>Brattich et al.(2017)</label><?label brattich17?><mixed-citation>Brattich, E., Liu, H., Tositti, L., Considine, D. B., and Crawford, J. H.: Processes controlling the seasonal variations in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">210</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Pb and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be at the Mt. Cimone WMO-GAW global station, Italy: a model analysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 1061–1080,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1061-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-1061-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Brattich} et~al.(2020)}?><label>Brattich et al.(2020)</label><?label brattich20?><mixed-citation>Brattich, E., Orza, J. A. G., Cristofanelli, P., Bonasoni, P., Marinoni, A., and Tositti, L.: Advection pathways at the Mt. Cimone WMO-GAW station: Seasonality, trends, and influence on atmospheric composition, Atmos. Environ., 234, 117513,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117513" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117513</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{Brattich et~al.(2021)}?><label>Brattich et al.(2021)</label><?label brattich21?><mixed-citation>Brattich, E., Liu, H., Zhang, B., Hernández-Ceballos, M. Á., Paatero, J., Sarvan, D., Djurdjevic, V., Tositti, L., and Ajtić, J.: Observation and modeling of high-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be events in Northern Europe associated with the instability of the Arctic polar vortex in early 2003, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss. [preprint],  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2020-1121" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-2020-1121</ext-link>, in review, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{Brost et~al.(1991)}?><label>Brost et al.(1991)</label><?label brost91?><mixed-citation>Brost, R. A., Feichter, J., and Heimann, M.: Three-dimensional simulation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be in a global climate model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 96, 22423–22445,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/91JD02283" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/91JD02283</ext-link>, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Butchart}(2014)}?><label>Butchart(2014)</label><?label butchard14?><mixed-citation>Butchart, N.: The Brewer-Dobson circulation, Rev. Geophys., 52, 157–184,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013RG000448" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2013RG000448</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Cohen} et~al.(2014)}?><label>Cohen et al.(2014)</label><?label cohen14?><mixed-citation>Cohen, N., Gerber, E., and Bühler, O.: What Drives the Brewer-Dobson Circulation?, J. Atmos. Sci., 71, 3837–3855,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-14-0021.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JAS-D-14-0021.1</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{Comprehensive Nuclear Test-Ban-Treaty Organization(2021)}?><label>Comprehensive Nuclear Test-Ban-Treaty Organization(2021)</label><?label data1?><mixed-citation>Comprehensive Nuclear Test-Ban-Treaty Organization: Beryllium-7 data, CTBTO [data set], available at: <uri>https://www.ctbto.org/specials/vdec/vdec-request-for-access</uri>,  last access: 1 September  2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{Cooke et~al.(1991)}?><label>Cooke et al.(1991)</label><?label cooke91?><mixed-citation>
Cooke, D., Humble, J., Shea, M., Smart, D., Lund, N., Rasmussen, I., Byrnak, B., Goret, P., and Petrou, N.: On cosmic-ray cut-off terminology, Nuovo Cimento C, 14, 213–234, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{Copernicus Climate Change Service(2021)}?><label>Copernicus Climate Change Service(2021)</label><?label data4?><mixed-citation>Copernicus Climate Change Service: ERA5 data, Climate Data Store [data set], available at: <uri>https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/#!/search?text=ERA5&amp;type=datase</uri>,  last access: 1 September  2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{Delaygue et~al.({2015})}?><label>Delaygue et al.(2015)</label><?label delaygue15?><mixed-citation>Delaygue, G., Bekki, S., and Bard, E.: Modelling the stratospheric budget of beryllium isotopes, Tellus B, 67, 28582,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v67.28582" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3402/tellusb.v67.28582</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Desai} and Giacalone(2016)}?><label>Desai and Giacalone(2016)</label><?label desai_LR_16?><mixed-citation>Desai, M. and Giacalone, J.: Large gradual solar energetic particle events, Living Rev. Sol. Phys., 13, 3,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s41116-016-0002-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s41116-016-0002-5</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{Dorman(2004)}?><label>Dorman(2004)</label><?label dorman04?><mixed-citation>
Dorman, L.: Cosmic Rays in the Earth's Atmosphere and Underground, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{Egorova et~al.(2003)}?><label>Egorova et al.(2003)</label><?label egorova03?><mixed-citation>
Egorova, T., Rozanov, E., Zubov, V., and Karol, I.: Model for investigating ozone trends (MEZON), Izv. Atmos. Ocean Phy., 39, 277–292, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{Emery and Camps(2017)}?><label>Emery and Camps(2017)</label><?label emery17?><mixed-citation>Emery, W. and Camps, A.: Introduction to Satellite Remote Sensing, Elsevier,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809254-5.00008-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/B978-0-12-809254-5.00008-7</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Feinberg} et~al.(2019)}?><label>Feinberg et al.(2019)</label><?label feinberg19?><mixed-citation>Feinberg, A., Sukhodolov, T., Luo, B.-P., Rozanov, E., Winkel, L. H. E., Peter, T., and Stenke, A.: Improved tropospheric and stratospheric sulfur cycle in the aerosol–chemistry–climate model SOCOL-AERv2, Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 3863–3887,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3863-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-12-3863-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{Field et~al.(2006)}?><label>Field et al.(2006)</label><?label field06?><mixed-citation>Field, C., Schmidt, G., Koch, D., and Salyk, C.: Modeling production and climate-related impacts on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be concentration in ice cores, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D15107, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006410" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JD006410</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{Finnish National Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority(2021)}?><label>Finnish National Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority(2021)</label><?label data2?><mixed-citation>Finnish National Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority: Beryllium-7 data, STUK [data set], available at: <uri>https://www.stuk.fi/avoin-data/ohjeet</uri>,  last access: 1 September  2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{Fraser-Smith(1987)}?><label>Fraser-Smith(1987)</label><?label fraser87?><mixed-citation>
Fraser-Smith, A. C.: Centered and eccentric geomagnetic dipoles and their poles, 1600–1985., Rev. Geophys., 25, 1–16, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Geant4 collaboration}(2020)}?><label>Geant4 collaboration(2020)</label><?label Geant4-Phys2020?><mixed-citation>Geant4 collaboration: Physics reference manual (version Geant4 10.6.0),
available at: <uri>https://geant4.web.cern.ch/support</uri> (last access: 1 September 2021), 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{Gleeson and Axford(1968)}?><label>Gleeson and Axford(1968)</label><?label gleeson68?><mixed-citation>Gleeson, L. and Axford, W.: Solar Modulation of Galactic Cosmic Rays, Astrophys. J., 154, 1011–1026,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1086/149822" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1086/149822</ext-link>, 1968.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Golubenko} et~al.(2020)}?><label>Golubenko et al.(2020)</label><?label golubenko20?><mixed-citation>Golubenko, K., Rozanov, E., Mironova, I., Karagodin, A., and Usoskin, I.: Natural Sources of Ionization and Their Impact on Atmospheric Electricity, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e88619,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL088619" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020GL088619</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{Golubenko et al.(2021)}?><label>Golubenko et al.(2021)</label><?label golubenko?><mixed-citation>Golubenko, K., Rozanov, E., Sukhodolov, T.,   and Usoskin, I.:  CCM SOCOL-AERv2-BEv1, Zenodo [code], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5006356" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.5006356</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{Haltia et~al.(2021)}?><label>Haltia et al.(2021)</label><?label haltia21?><mixed-citation>Haltia, E., Leppänen, A.-P., Kallio, A., and Saarinen, T.: Sediment profile dating and reconstructing nuclear events from annually laminated lake sediments in northern Finland, J. Environ. Radioactiv., 233, 106611,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2021.106611" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jenvrad.2021.106611</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Hauglustaine} et~al.(1994)}?><label>Hauglustaine et al.(1994)</label><?label hauglustaine94?><mixed-citation>Hauglustaine, D. A., Granier, C., Brasseur, G. P., and MéGie, G.: The importance of atmospheric chemistry in the calculation of radiative forcing on the climate system, J. Geophys. Res., 99, 1173–1186,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/93JD02987" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/93JD02987</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{Heck et~al.(1998)}?><label>Heck et al.(1998)</label><?label heck98?><mixed-citation>
Heck, D., Knapp, J., Capdevielle, J., Schatz, G., and Thouw, T.: CORSIKA: A Monte Carlo Code to Simulate Extensive Air Showers, in: FZKA 6019, Forschungszentrum, Karlsruhe, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Heikkil{\"{a}}} et~al.(2008a)}?><label>Heikkilä et al.(2008a)</label><?label heikkila_JGR_08?><mixed-citation>Heikkilä, U., Beer, J., and Alfimov, V.: Beryllium-10 and beryllium-7 in precipitation in Dübendorf (440 m) and at Jungfraujoch (3580 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), Switzerland (1998–2005), J. Geophys. Res., 113, D11104,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009160" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JD009160</ext-link>, 2008a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Heikkil{\"{a}}} et~al.(2008b)}?><label>Heikkilä et al.(2008b)</label><?label heikkila08?><mixed-citation>Heikkilä, U., Beer, J., and Feichter, J.: Modeling cosmogenic radionuclides <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be during the Maunder Minimum using the ECHAM5-HAM General Circulation Model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 2797–2809,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-2797-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-2797-2008</ext-link>, 2008b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Heikkil{\"{a}}} et~al.(2009)}?><label>Heikkilä et al.(2009)</label><?label heikkila09?><mixed-citation>Heikkilä, U., Beer, J., and Feichter, J.: Meridional transport and deposition of atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 515–527,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-515-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-515-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page7618?><ref id="bib1.bibx30"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Heikkil{\"{a}}} et~al.(2013)}?><label>Heikkilä et al.(2013)</label><?label heikkila13?><mixed-citation>Heikkilä, U., Beer, J., Abreu, J. A., and Steinhilber, F.: On the Atmospheric Transport and Deposition of the Cosmogenic Radionuclides (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be): A Review, Space Sci. Rev., 176, 321–332,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-011-9838-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11214-011-9838-0</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Hommel} et~al.(2011)}?><label>Hommel et al.(2011)</label><?label hommel11?><mixed-citation>Hommel, R., Timmreck, C., and Graf, H. F.: The global middle-atmosphere aerosol model MAECHAM5-SAM2: comparison with satellite and in-situ observations, Geosci. Model Dev., 4, 809–834,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-809-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-4-809-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Ioannidou} and Paatero(2014)}?><label>Ioannidou and Paatero(2014)</label><?label ioannidou15?><mixed-citation>Ioannidou, A. and Paatero, J.: Activity size distribution and residence time of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be aerosols in the Arctic atmosphere, Atmos. Environ., 88, 99–106,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.12.046" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.12.046</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Jordan} et~al.(2003)}?><label>Jordan et al.(2003)</label><?label jordan03?><mixed-citation>Jordan, C. E., Dibb, J. E., and Finkel, R. C.: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be<inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Be tracer of atmospheric transport and stratosphere-troposphere exchange, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4234,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002395" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002JD002395</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{Kerkweg et~al.(2006a)}?><label>Kerkweg et al.(2006a)</label><?label kerkweg06?><mixed-citation>Kerkweg, A., Buchholz, J., Ganzeveld, L., Pozzer, A., Tost, H., and Jöckel, P.: Technical Note: An implementation of the dry removal processes DRY DEPosition and SEDImentation in the Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 4617–4632,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-4617-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-4617-2006</ext-link>, 2006a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{Kerkweg et~al.(2006b)}?><label>Kerkweg et al.(2006b)</label><?label tost06?><mixed-citation>Kerkweg, A., Buchholz, J., Ganzeveld, L., Pozzer, A., Tost, H., and Jöckel, P.: Technical Note: An implementation of the dry removal processes DRY DEPosition and SEDImentation in the Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 4617–4632,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-4617-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-4617-2006</ext-link>, 2006b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{Koch et~al.(2006)}?><label>Koch et al.(2006)</label><?label koch06?><mixed-citation>Koch, D., Schmidt, G. A., and Field, C. V.: Sulfur, sea salt and radionuclide aerosols in GISS ModelE, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D06206,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005550" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004JD005550</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Koldobskiy} et~al.(2021)}?><label>Koldobskiy et al.(2021)</label><?label koldobskiy21?><mixed-citation>Koldobskiy, S. A., Raukunen, O., Vainio, R., Kovaltsov, G., and Usoskin, I.: New reconstruction of event-integrated spectra (spectral fluences) for major solar energetic particle events, Astron. Astrophys., 647, A132,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202040058" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1051/0004-6361/202040058</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Kovaltsov} and Usoskin(2010)}?><label>Kovaltsov and Usoskin(2010)</label><?label kovaltsov10?><mixed-citation>Kovaltsov, G. and Usoskin, I.: A new 3D numerical model of cosmogenic nuclide
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be production in the atmosphere, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 291, 182–188, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{Lal and Peters(1967)}?><label>Lal and Peters(1967)</label><?label lal67?><mixed-citation>
Lal, D. and Peters, B.: Cosmic Ray Produced Radioactivity on the Earth, in: Handbuch der Physik, edited by: Sittle, K., vol. 46, Springer, Berlin, 551–612, 1967.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{Land and Feichter(2003)}?><label>Land and Feichter(2003)</label><?label land03?><mixed-citation>Land, C. and Feichter, J.: Stratosphere–troposphere exchange in a changing climate simulated with the general circulation model MAECHAM4, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 8523, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002543" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002JD002543</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Lepp\"{a}nen}(2019)}?><label>Leppänen(2019)</label><?label leppanen19?><mixed-citation>Leppänen, A.: Deposition of naturally occurring <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">210</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Pb in Northern Finland, J. Environ. Radioactiv., 208–209, 105995,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2019.105995" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jenvrad.2019.105995</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Lepp{\"{a}}nen} et~al.(2012)}?><label>Leppänen et al.(2012)</label><?label leppanen12?><mixed-citation>Leppänen, A.-P., Usoskin, I. G., Kovaltsov, G. A., and Paatero, J.: Cosmogenic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">22</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Na in Finland: Production, observed periodicities and the connection to climatic phenomena, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phy., 74, 164–180,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2011.10.017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jastp.2011.10.017</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{Lin and Rood(1996)}?><label>Lin and Rood(1996)</label><?label lin96?><mixed-citation>
Lin, S. and Rood, R.: Multidimensional flux-form semi-Lagrangian transport schemes, Mon. Weather Rev., 124, 2046–2070, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{McCracken(2004)}?><label>McCracken(2004)</label><?label mccracken_JGR_04?><mixed-citation>McCracken, K.: Geomagnetic and atmospheric effects upon the cosmogenic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be observed in polar ice, J. Geophys. Res., 109,  A04101, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JA010060" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003JA010060</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{Medici(2001)}?><label>Medici(2001)</label><?label medici01?><mixed-citation>
Medici, F.: Particulate sampling in the IMS radionuclide network of the Comprehensive-Nuclear Test Ban Treaty, Kerntechnik, 66, 121–125, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{Miley et~al.(1998)}?><label>Miley et al.(1998)</label><?label miley98?><mixed-citation>
Miley, H., Bowyer, S., Hubbard, C., McKinnon, A., Perkins, R., Thompson, R., and Warner, R.: A description of the DOE Radionuclide Aerosol Sampler/Analyzer for the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Ch., 235, 83–87, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Mironova} et~al.(2015)}?><label>Mironova et al.(2015)</label><?label mironova15?><mixed-citation>Mironova, I. A., Aplin, K. L., Arnold, F., Bazilevskaya, G. A., Harrison, R. G., Krivolutsky, A. A., Nicoll, K. A., Rozanov, E. V., Turunen, E., and Usoskin, I. G.: Energetic Particle Influence on the Earth's Atmosphere, Space Sci Rev., 194, 1–96,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-015-0185-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11214-015-0185-4</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{Miyake et~al.(2012)}?><label>Miyake et al.(2012)</label><?label miyake12?><mixed-citation>Miyake, F., Nagaya, K., Masuda, K., and Nakamura, T.: A signature of cosmic-ray increase in ad 774–775 from tree rings in Japan, Nature, 486, 240–242,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11123" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature11123</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{Monge-Sanz and Chipperfield(2006)}?><label>Monge-Sanz and Chipperfield(2006)</label><?label monge-sanz?><mixed-citation>Monge-Sanz, B. and Chipperfield, M.: Chemical transport modelling, in:
ECMWF/Geo Workshop on Atmospheric Reanalyis, 19–22 June 2006, ECMWF,
Shinfield Park, Reading,  39–44, available at: <uri>https://www.ecmwf.int/node/11221</uri> (last access: 1 May 2021), 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{Nordeng(1994)}?><label>Nordeng(1994)</label><?label Nordeng_94?><mixed-citation>Nordeng, T.-E.: Extended versions of the convective parametrization scheme at ECMWF and their impact on the mean and transient activity of the model in the tropics, p. 41,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.21957/e34xwhysw" ext-link-type="DOI">10.21957/e34xwhysw</ext-link>, <uri>https://www.ecmwf.int/node/11393</uri> (last access: 1 September 2021), 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Pacini} et~al.(2011)}?><label>Pacini et al.(2011)</label><?label pacini11?><mixed-citation>Pacini, A. A., Usoskin, I. G., Evangelista, H., Echer, E., and de Paula, R.: Cosmogenic isotope <inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be: A case study of depositional processes in Rio de Janeiro in 2008–2009, Adv. Space Res., 48, 811–818,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2011.04.035" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.asr.2011.04.035</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Pacini} et~al.(2015)}?><label>Pacini et al.(2015)</label><?label pacini_AE_15?><mixed-citation>Pacini, A. A., Usoskin, I. G., Mursula, K., Echer, E., and Evangelista, H.: Signature of a sudden stratospheric warming in the near-ground <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be flux, Atmos. Environ., 113, 27–31,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.04.065" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.04.065</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{Pierce et~al.(2010)}?><label>Pierce et al.(2010)</label><?label pierce10?><mixed-citation>Pierce, J. R., Weisenstein, D. K., Heckendorn, P., Peter, T., and Keith, D. W.: Efficient formation of stratospheric aerosol for climate engineering by emission of condensible vapor from aircraft, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L18805, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL043975" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010GL043975</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx54"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Poluianov} et~al.(2016)}?><label>Poluianov et al.(2016)</label><?label poluianov16?><mixed-citation>Poluianov, S., Kovaltsov, G. A., Mishev, A. L., and Usoskin, I. G.: Production of cosmogenic isotopes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">22</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Na, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">36</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cl in the atmosphere: Altitudinal profiles of yield functions, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 8125–8136,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025034" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016JD025034</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx55"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{Radiation Protection Bureau of Health Canada(2021)}?><label>Radiation Protection Bureau of Health Canada(2021)</label><?label data3?><mixed-citation>Radiation Protection Bureau of Health Canada: Beryllium-7 data, RPBHC  [data set], available at: <uri>https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/corporate/contact-us/</uri>, last access: 1 September 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx56"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Raisbeck} et~al.(1981)}?><label>Raisbeck et al.(1981)</label><?label raisbeck81?><mixed-citation>Raisbeck, G. M., Yiou, F., Fruneau, M., Loiseaux, J. M., Lieuvin, M., and Ravel, J. C.: Cosmogenic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be<inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Be as a probe of atmospheric transport processes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 8, 1015–1018,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/GL008i009p01015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/GL008i009p01015</ext-link>, 1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx57"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Raukunen} et~al.(2018)}?><label>Raukunen et al.(2018)</label><?label raukunen18?><mixed-citation>Raukunen, O., Vainio, R., Tylka, A. J., Dietrich, W. F., Jiggens, P., Heynderickx, D., Dierckxsens, M., Crosby, N., Ganse, U., and Siipola, R.: Two solar proton fluence models based on ground level enhancement observations, J. Space Weather Spac., 8, A04,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2017031" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1051/swsc/2017031</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page7619?><ref id="bib1.bibx58"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{Roeckner et al.(2003)}?><label>Roeckner et al.(2003)</label><?label roeckner_03?><mixed-citation>Roeckner, E., Bauml, G., Bonaventura, L., Brokopf, R., Esch, M., Giorgetta, M., Hagemann, S., Kirchner, I., Kornblueh, L., Manzini, E., Rhodin, A., Schlese, U., Schulzweida, U., and Tompkins, A.: The atmospheric general circulation model ECHAM5, PART I: Model description, Tech. rep., Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, MPI-Report 349,  available at: <uri>http://www.mpimet.mpg.de/fileadmin/publikationen/Reports/max scirep 349.pdf</uri> (last access: 1 September 2021), 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx59"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{Steinhilber et~al.(2012)}?><label>Steinhilber et al.(2012)</label><?label steinhilber12?><mixed-citation>Steinhilber, F., Abreu, J., Beer, J., Brunner, I., Christl, M., Fischer, H., Heikkilae, U., Kubik, P., Mann, M., McCracken, K., Miller, H., Miyahara, H., Oerter, H., and Wilhelms, F.: 9,400 years of cosmic radiation and solar activity from ice cores and tree rings, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 109, 5967–5971,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1118965109" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1118965109</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx60"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Stenke} et~al.(2013)}?><label>Stenke et al.(2013)</label><?label stenke13?><mixed-citation>Stenke, A., Schraner, M., Rozanov, E., Egorova, T., Luo, B., and Peter, T.: The SOCOL version 3.0 chemistry–climate model: description, evaluation, and implications from an advanced transport algorithm, Geosci. Model Dev., 6, 1407–1427,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-1407-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-6-1407-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx61"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{Sukhodolov et~al.(2017)}?><label>Sukhodolov et al.(2017)</label><?label sukhodolov17?><mixed-citation>Sukhodolov, T., Usoskin, I., Rozanov, E., Asvestari, E., Ball, W., Curran, M., Fischer, H., Kovaltsov, G., Miyake, F., Peter, T., Plummer, C., Schmutz, W., Severi, M., and Traversi, R.: Atmospheric impacts of the strongest known solar particle storm of 775 AD, Sci. Rep.-UK, 7, 45257,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep45257" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep45257</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx62"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Terzi} et~al.(2020)}?><label>Terzi et al.(2020)</label><?label terzi20?><mixed-citation>Terzi, L., Wotawa, G., Schoeppner, M., Kalinowski, M., Saey, P. R. J., Steinmann, P., Luan, L., and Staten, P. W.: Radioisotopes demonstrate changes in global atmospheric circulation possibly caused by global warming, Sci. Rep.-UK, 10, 10695,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-66541-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41598-020-66541-5</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx63"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Th{\'{e}}bault} et~al.(2015)}?><label>Thébault et al.(2015)</label><?label thebault15?><mixed-citation>Thébault, E., Finlay, C. C., Beggan, C. D., Alken, P., Aubert, J., Barrois, O., Bertrand, F., Bondar, T., Boness, A., Brocco, L., Canet, E., Chambodut, A., Chulliat, A., Coïsson, P., Civet, F., Du, A., Fournier, A., Fratter, I., Gillet, N., Hamilton, B., Hamoudi, M., Hulot, G., Jager, T., Korte, M., Kuang, W., Lalanne, X., Langlais, B., Léger, J.-M., Lesur, V., Lowes, F. J., Macmillan, S., Mandea, M., Manoj, C., Maus, S., Olsen, N., Petrov, V., Ridley, V., Rother, M., Sabaka, T. J., Saturnino, D., Schachtschneider, R., Sirol, O., Tangborn, A., Thomson, A., Tøffner-Clausen, L., Vigneron, P., Wardinski, I., and Zvereva, T.: International Geomagnetic Reference Field: the 12th generation, Earth Planets Space, 67, 79,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-015-0228-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1186/s40623-015-0228-9</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx64"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{Tiedtke(1989)}?><label>Tiedtke(1989)</label><?label tiedtke_89?><mixed-citation>
Tiedtke, M.: A comprehensive mass flux scheme for cumulus parameterization in large-scale models, Mon. Weather Rev., 117, 1779–1800, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx65"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{Tost et~al.(2007)}?><label>Tost et al.(2007)</label><?label tost07?><mixed-citation>Tost, H., Jöckel, P., Kerkweg, A., Pozzer, A., Sander, R., and Lelieveld, J.: Global cloud and precipitation chemistry and wet deposition: tropospheric model simulations with ECHAM5/MESSy1, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 2733–2757,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-2733-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-2733-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx66"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{Tost et~al.(2010)}?><label>Tost et al.(2010)</label><?label tost10?><mixed-citation>Tost, H., Lawrence, M. G., Brühl, C., Jöckel, P., The GABRIEL Team, and The SCOUT-O3-DARWIN/ACTIVE Team: Uncertainties in atmospheric chemistry modelling due to convection parameterisations and subsequent scavenging, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 1931–1951,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1931-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-1931-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx67"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{Usoskin and Kovaltsov(2008)}?><label>Usoskin and Kovaltsov(2008)</label><?label usoskin_7Be_08?><mixed-citation>Usoskin, I. and Kovaltsov, G.: Production of cosmogenic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be isotope in the atmosphere: Full 3D modelling, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D12107,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009725" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JD009725</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx68"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{Usoskin et~al.(2006)}?><label>Usoskin et al.(2006)</label><?label usoskin_GRL_SCR06?><mixed-citation>Usoskin, I., Solanki, S., Kovaltsov, G., Beer, J., and Kromer, B.: Solar proton events in cosmogenic isotope data, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L08107,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL026059" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006GL026059</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx69"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{Usoskin et~al.(2020a)}?><label>Usoskin et al.(2020a)</label><?label usoskin_1956_20?><mixed-citation>Usoskin, I., Koldobskiy, S., Kovaltsov, G., Rozanov, E., Sukhodolov, T., Mishev, A., and Mironova, I.: Revisited Reference Solar Proton Event of 23 February 1956: Assessment of the Cosmogenic-Isotope Method Sensitivity to Extreme Solar Events, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 125, e27921,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JA027921" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020JA027921</ext-link>, 2020a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx70"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{Usoskin et~al.(2020b)}?><label>Usoskin et al.(2020b)</label><?label usoskin_GLE_20?><mixed-citation>Usoskin, I., Koldobskiy, S., Kovaltsov, G. A., Gil, A., Usoskina, I., Willamo, T., and Ibragimov, A.: Revised GLE database: Fluences of solar energetic particles as measured by the neutron-monitor network since 1956, Astron. Astrophys., 640, A17,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202038272" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1051/0004-6361/202038272</ext-link>, 2020b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx71"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{Usoskin(2017)}?><label>Usoskin(2017)</label><?label usoskin_LR_17?><mixed-citation>Usoskin, I. G.: A History of Solar Activity over Millennia, Living Rev. Sol. Phys., 14, 3,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s41116-017-0006-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s41116-017-0006-9</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx72"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{Usoskin et~al.(2009a)}?><label>Usoskin et al.(2009a)</label><?label usoskin_7Be_09?><mixed-citation>Usoskin, I. G., Field, C. V., Schmidt, G. A., Leppänen, A.-P., Aldahan, A., Kovaltsov, G. A., Possnert, G., and Ungar, R. K.: Short-term production and synoptic influences on atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be concentrations, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D06108,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011333" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD011333</ext-link>, 2009a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx73"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{Usoskin et~al.(2009b)}?><label>Usoskin et al.(2009b)</label><?label usoskin_10Be_09?><mixed-citation>Usoskin, I. G., Horiuchi, K., Solanki, S., Kovaltsov, G. A., and Bard, E.: On the common solar signal in different cosmogenic isotope data sets, J. Geophys. Res., 114, A03112,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JA013888" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JA013888</ext-link>, 2009b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx74"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{Usoskin et~al.(2010)}?><label>Usoskin et al.(2010)</label><?label usoskin_Geo_10?><mixed-citation>Usoskin, I. G., Mironova, I. A., Korte, M., and Kovaltsov, G. A.: Regional millennial trend in the cosmic ray induced ionization of the troposphere, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phy., 72, 19–25,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2009.10.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jastp.2009.10.003</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx75"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{Usoskin et~al.(2017)}?><label>Usoskin et al.(2017)</label><?label usoskin_gil_17?><mixed-citation>Usoskin, I. G., Gil, A., Kovaltsov, G. A., Mishev, A. L., and Mikhailov, V. V.: Heliospheric modulation of cosmic rays during the neutron monitor era: Calibration using PAMELA data for 2006–2010, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 122, 3875–3887,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA023819" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016JA023819</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx76"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Vainio} et~al.(2009)}?><label>Vainio et al.(2009)</label><?label vainio09?><mixed-citation>Vainio, R., Desorgher, L., Heynderickx, D., Storini, M., Flückiger, E., Horne, R. B., Kovaltsov, G. A., Kudela, K., Laurenza, M., McKenna-Lawlor, S., Rothkaehl, H., and Usoskin, I. G.: Dynamics of the Earth's particle radiation environment, Space Sci. Rev., 147, 187–231,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-009-9496-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11214-009-9496-7</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx77"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{Weisenstein et~al.(1997)}?><label>Weisenstein et al.(1997)</label><?label weisenstein97?><mixed-citation>Weisenstein, D. K., Yue, G. K., Ko, M. K. W., Sze, N.-D., Rodriguez, J. M., and Scott, C. J.: A two-dimensional model of sulfur species and aerosols, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 102, 13019–13035,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD00901" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/97JD00901</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx78"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{Weisenstein et~al.(2015)}?><label>Weisenstein et al.(2015)</label><?label weisenstein_15?><mixed-citation>Weisenstein, D. K., Keith, D. W., and Dykema, J. A.: Solar geoengineering using solid aerosol in the stratosphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 11835–11859,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11835-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-11835-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx79"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Wesely}(1989)}?><label>Wesely(1989)</label><?label wesely89?><mixed-citation>Wesely, M. L.: Parameterization of surface resistances to gaseous dry deposition in regional-scale numerical models, Atmos. Environ., 23, 1293–1304,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(89)90153-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0004-6981(89)90153-4</ext-link>, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx80"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Wu} et~al.(2018)}?><label>Wu et al.(2018)</label><?label wu18?><mixed-citation>Wu, C. J., Usoskin, I. G., Krivova, N., Kovaltsov, G. A., Baroni, M., Bard, E., and Solanki, S. K.: <?pagebreak page7620?>Solar activity over nine millennia: A consistent multi-proxy reconstruction, Astron. Astrophys., 615, A93,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201731892" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1051/0004-6361/201731892</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx81"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{Zheng et~al.(2021)}?><label>Zheng et al.(2021)</label><?label zheng21?><mixed-citation>Zheng, M., Sjolte, J., Adolphi, F., Aldahan, A., Possnert, G., Wu, M., and Muscheler, R.: Solar and meteorological influences on seasonal atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be in Europe for 1975 to 2018, Chemosphere, 263, 128318,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128318" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128318</ext-link>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx82"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{Zhou et~al.(2006)}?><label>Zhou et al.(2006)</label><?label zhou_06?><mixed-citation>Zhou, T., Geller, M. A., and Hamilton, K.: The roles of the Hadley circulation and downward control in tropical upwelling, J. Atmos. Sci., 63, 2740–2757,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3770.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JAS3770.1</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Application of CCM SOCOL-AERv2-BE to cosmogenic beryllium isotopes: description and validation for polar regions</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Beer et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Beer, J., McCracken, K., and von Steiger, R.: Cosmogenic Radionuclides: Theory and Applications in the Terrestrial and Space Environments, Springer, Berlin, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Brattich et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Brattich, E., Liu, H., Tositti, L., Considine, D. B., and Crawford, J. H.: Processes controlling the seasonal variations in <sup>210</sup>Pb and <sup>7</sup>Be at the Mt. Cimone WMO-GAW global station, Italy: a model analysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 1061–1080,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1061-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1061-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Brattich et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
Brattich, E., Orza, J. A. G., Cristofanelli, P., Bonasoni, P., Marinoni, A., and Tositti, L.: Advection pathways at the Mt. Cimone WMO-GAW station: Seasonality, trends, and influence on atmospheric composition, Atmos. Environ., 234, 117513,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117513" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117513</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Brattich et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
Brattich, E., Liu, H., Zhang, B., Hernández-Ceballos, M. Á., Paatero, J., Sarvan, D., Djurdjevic, V., Tositti, L., and Ajtić, J.: Observation and modeling of high-<sup>7</sup>Be events in Northern Europe associated with the instability of the Arctic polar vortex in early 2003, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss. [preprint],  <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2020-1121" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2020-1121</a>, in review, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Brost et al.(1991)</label><mixed-citation>
Brost, R. A., Feichter, J., and Heimann, M.: Three-dimensional simulation of <sup>7</sup>Be in a global climate model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 96, 22423–22445,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/91JD02283" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/91JD02283</a>, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Butchart(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Butchart, N.: The Brewer-Dobson circulation, Rev. Geophys., 52, 157–184,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013RG000448" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2013RG000448</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Cohen et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Cohen, N., Gerber, E., and Bühler, O.: What Drives the Brewer-Dobson Circulation?, J. Atmos. Sci., 71, 3837–3855,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-14-0021.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-14-0021.1</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Comprehensive Nuclear Test-Ban-Treaty Organization(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
Comprehensive Nuclear Test-Ban-Treaty Organization: Beryllium-7 data, CTBTO [data set], available at: <a href="https://www.ctbto.org/specials/vdec/vdec-request-for-access" target="_blank"/>,  last access: 1 September  2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Cooke et al.(1991)</label><mixed-citation>
Cooke, D., Humble, J., Shea, M., Smart, D., Lund, N., Rasmussen, I., Byrnak, B., Goret, P., and Petrou, N.: On cosmic-ray cut-off terminology, Nuovo Cimento C, 14, 213–234, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Copernicus Climate Change Service(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
Copernicus Climate Change Service: ERA5 data, Climate Data Store [data set], available at: <a href="https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/#!/search?text=ERA5&amp;type=datase" target="_blank"/>,  last access: 1 September  2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Delaygue et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Delaygue, G., Bekki, S., and Bard, E.: Modelling the stratospheric budget of beryllium isotopes, Tellus B, 67, 28582,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v67.28582" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v67.28582</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Desai and Giacalone(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Desai, M. and Giacalone, J.: Large gradual solar energetic particle events, Living Rev. Sol. Phys., 13, 3,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s41116-016-0002-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s41116-016-0002-5</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Dorman(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Dorman, L.: Cosmic Rays in the Earth's Atmosphere and Underground, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Egorova et al.(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
Egorova, T., Rozanov, E., Zubov, V., and Karol, I.: Model for investigating ozone trends (MEZON), Izv. Atmos. Ocean Phy., 39, 277–292, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Emery and Camps(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Emery, W. and Camps, A.: Introduction to Satellite Remote Sensing, Elsevier,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809254-5.00008-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809254-5.00008-7</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Feinberg et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
Feinberg, A., Sukhodolov, T., Luo, B.-P., Rozanov, E., Winkel, L. H. E., Peter, T., and Stenke, A.: Improved tropospheric and stratospheric sulfur cycle in the aerosol–chemistry–climate model SOCOL-AERv2, Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 3863–3887,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3863-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3863-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Field et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Field, C., Schmidt, G., Koch, D., and Salyk, C.: Modeling production and climate-related impacts on <sup>10</sup>Be concentration in ice cores, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D15107, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006410" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006410</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Finnish National Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
Finnish National Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority: Beryllium-7 data, STUK [data set], available at: <a href="https://www.stuk.fi/avoin-data/ohjeet" target="_blank"/>,  last access: 1 September  2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Fraser-Smith(1987)</label><mixed-citation>
Fraser-Smith, A. C.: Centered and eccentric geomagnetic dipoles and their poles, 1600–1985., Rev. Geophys., 25, 1–16, 1987.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Geant4 collaboration(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
Geant4 collaboration: Physics reference manual (version Geant4 10.6.0),
available at: <a href="https://geant4.web.cern.ch/support" target="_blank"/> (last access: 1 September 2021), 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Gleeson and Axford(1968)</label><mixed-citation>
Gleeson, L. and Axford, W.: Solar Modulation of Galactic Cosmic Rays, Astrophys. J., 154, 1011–1026,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1086/149822" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1086/149822</a>, 1968.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Golubenko et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
Golubenko, K., Rozanov, E., Mironova, I., Karagodin, A., and Usoskin, I.: Natural Sources of Ionization and Their Impact on Atmospheric Electricity, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e88619,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL088619" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL088619</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Golubenko et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
Golubenko, K., Rozanov, E., Sukhodolov, T.,   and Usoskin, I.:  CCM SOCOL-AERv2-BEv1, Zenodo [code], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5006356" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5006356</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Haltia et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
Haltia, E., Leppänen, A.-P., Kallio, A., and Saarinen, T.: Sediment profile dating and reconstructing nuclear events from annually laminated lake sediments in northern Finland, J. Environ. Radioactiv., 233, 106611,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2021.106611" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2021.106611</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Hauglustaine et al.(1994)</label><mixed-citation>
Hauglustaine, D. A., Granier, C., Brasseur, G. P., and MéGie, G.: The importance of atmospheric chemistry in the calculation of radiative forcing on the climate system, J. Geophys. Res., 99, 1173–1186,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/93JD02987" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/93JD02987</a>, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Heck et al.(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
Heck, D., Knapp, J., Capdevielle, J., Schatz, G., and Thouw, T.: CORSIKA: A Monte Carlo Code to Simulate Extensive Air Showers, in: FZKA 6019, Forschungszentrum, Karlsruhe, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Heikkilä et al.(2008a)</label><mixed-citation>
Heikkilä, U., Beer, J., and Alfimov, V.: Beryllium-10 and beryllium-7 in precipitation in Dübendorf (440&thinsp;m) and at Jungfraujoch (3580&thinsp;m), Switzerland (1998–2005), J. Geophys. Res., 113, D11104,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009160" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009160</a>, 2008a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Heikkilä et al.(2008b)</label><mixed-citation>
Heikkilä, U., Beer, J., and Feichter, J.: Modeling cosmogenic radionuclides <sup>10</sup>Be and <sup>7</sup>Be during the Maunder Minimum using the ECHAM5-HAM General Circulation Model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 2797–2809,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-2797-2008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-2797-2008</a>, 2008b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Heikkilä et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Heikkilä, U., Beer, J., and Feichter, J.: Meridional transport and deposition of atmospheric <sup>10</sup>Be, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 515–527,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-515-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-515-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Heikkilä et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Heikkilä, U., Beer, J., Abreu, J. A., and Steinhilber, F.: On the Atmospheric Transport and Deposition of the Cosmogenic Radionuclides (<sup>10</sup>Be): A Review, Space Sci. Rev., 176, 321–332,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-011-9838-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-011-9838-0</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Hommel et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Hommel, R., Timmreck, C., and Graf, H. F.: The global middle-atmosphere aerosol model MAECHAM5-SAM2: comparison with satellite and in-situ observations, Geosci. Model Dev., 4, 809–834,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-809-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-809-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Ioannidou and Paatero(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Ioannidou, A. and Paatero, J.: Activity size distribution and residence time of <sup>7</sup>Be aerosols in the Arctic atmosphere, Atmos. Environ., 88, 99–106,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.12.046" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.12.046</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Jordan et al.(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
Jordan, C. E., Dibb, J. E., and Finkel, R. C.: <sup>10</sup>Be∕<sup>7</sup>Be tracer of atmospheric transport and stratosphere-troposphere exchange, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4234,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002395" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002395</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Kerkweg et al.(2006a)</label><mixed-citation>
Kerkweg, A., Buchholz, J., Ganzeveld, L., Pozzer, A., Tost, H., and Jöckel, P.: Technical Note: An implementation of the dry removal processes DRY DEPosition and SEDImentation in the Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 4617–4632,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-4617-2006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-4617-2006</a>, 2006a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Kerkweg et al.(2006b)</label><mixed-citation>
Kerkweg, A., Buchholz, J., Ganzeveld, L., Pozzer, A., Tost, H., and Jöckel, P.: Technical Note: An implementation of the dry removal processes DRY DEPosition and SEDImentation in the Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 4617–4632,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-4617-2006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-4617-2006</a>, 2006b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Koch et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Koch, D., Schmidt, G. A., and Field, C. V.: Sulfur, sea salt and radionuclide aerosols in GISS ModelE, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D06206,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005550" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005550</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Koldobskiy et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
Koldobskiy, S. A., Raukunen, O., Vainio, R., Kovaltsov, G., and Usoskin, I.: New reconstruction of event-integrated spectra (spectral fluences) for major solar energetic particle events, Astron. Astrophys., 647, A132,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202040058" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202040058</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Kovaltsov and Usoskin(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Kovaltsov, G. and Usoskin, I.: A new 3D numerical model of cosmogenic nuclide
<sup>10</sup>Be production in the atmosphere, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 291, 182–188, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Lal and Peters(1967)</label><mixed-citation>
Lal, D. and Peters, B.: Cosmic Ray Produced Radioactivity on the Earth, in: Handbuch der Physik, edited by: Sittle, K., vol. 46, Springer, Berlin, 551–612, 1967.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Land and Feichter(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
Land, C. and Feichter, J.: Stratosphere–troposphere exchange in a changing climate simulated with the general circulation model MAECHAM4, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 8523, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002543" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002543</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Leppänen(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
Leppänen, A.: Deposition of naturally occurring <sup>7</sup>Be and <sup>210</sup>Pb in Northern Finland, J. Environ. Radioactiv., 208–209, 105995,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2019.105995" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2019.105995</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Leppänen et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Leppänen, A.-P., Usoskin, I. G., Kovaltsov, G. A., and Paatero, J.: Cosmogenic <sup>7</sup>Be and <sup>22</sup>Na in Finland: Production, observed periodicities and the connection to climatic phenomena, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phy., 74, 164–180,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2011.10.017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2011.10.017</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Lin and Rood(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
Lin, S. and Rood, R.: Multidimensional flux-form semi-Lagrangian transport schemes, Mon. Weather Rev., 124, 2046–2070, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>McCracken(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
McCracken, K.: Geomagnetic and atmospheric effects upon the cosmogenic <sup>10</sup>Be observed in polar ice, J. Geophys. Res., 109,  A04101, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JA010060" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JA010060</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Medici(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
Medici, F.: Particulate sampling in the IMS radionuclide network of the Comprehensive-Nuclear Test Ban Treaty, Kerntechnik, 66, 121–125, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>Miley et al.(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
Miley, H., Bowyer, S., Hubbard, C., McKinnon, A., Perkins, R., Thompson, R., and Warner, R.: A description of the DOE Radionuclide Aerosol Sampler/Analyzer for the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Ch., 235, 83–87, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>Mironova et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Mironova, I. A., Aplin, K. L., Arnold, F., Bazilevskaya, G. A., Harrison, R. G., Krivolutsky, A. A., Nicoll, K. A., Rozanov, E. V., Turunen, E., and Usoskin, I. G.: Energetic Particle Influence on the Earth's Atmosphere, Space Sci Rev., 194, 1–96,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-015-0185-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-015-0185-4</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>Miyake et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Miyake, F., Nagaya, K., Masuda, K., and Nakamura, T.: A signature of cosmic-ray increase in ad 774–775 from tree rings in Japan, Nature, 486, 240–242,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11123" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11123</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>Monge-Sanz and Chipperfield(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Monge-Sanz, B. and Chipperfield, M.: Chemical transport modelling, in:
ECMWF/Geo Workshop on Atmospheric Reanalyis, 19–22 June 2006, ECMWF,
Shinfield Park, Reading,  39–44, available at: <a href="https://www.ecmwf.int/node/11221" target="_blank"/> (last access: 1 May 2021), 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>Nordeng(1994)</label><mixed-citation> Nordeng, T.-E.: Extended versions of the convective parametrization scheme at ECMWF and their impact on the mean and transient activity of the model in the tropics, p. 41,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.21957/e34xwhysw" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.21957/e34xwhysw</a>, <a href="https://www.ecmwf.int/node/11393" target="_blank"/> (last access: 1 September 2021), 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>Pacini et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Pacini, A. A., Usoskin, I. G., Evangelista, H., Echer, E., and de Paula, R.: Cosmogenic isotope <sup>7</sup>Be: A case study of depositional processes in Rio de Janeiro in 2008–2009, Adv. Space Res., 48, 811–818,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2011.04.035" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2011.04.035</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>Pacini et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Pacini, A. A., Usoskin, I. G., Mursula, K., Echer, E., and Evangelista, H.: Signature of a sudden stratospheric warming in the near-ground <sup>7</sup>Be flux, Atmos. Environ., 113, 27–31,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.04.065" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.04.065</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>Pierce et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Pierce, J. R., Weisenstein, D. K., Heckendorn, P., Peter, T., and Keith, D. W.: Efficient formation of stratospheric aerosol for climate engineering by emission of condensible vapor from aircraft, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L18805, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL043975" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL043975</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>Poluianov et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Poluianov, S., Kovaltsov, G. A., Mishev, A. L., and Usoskin, I. G.: Production of cosmogenic isotopes <sup>7</sup>Be, <sup>10</sup>Be, <sup>14</sup>C, <sup>22</sup>Na, and <sup>36</sup>Cl in the atmosphere: Altitudinal profiles of yield functions, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 8125–8136,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025034" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025034</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>Radiation Protection Bureau of Health Canada(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
Radiation Protection Bureau of Health Canada: Beryllium-7 data, RPBHC  [data set], available at: <a href="https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/corporate/contact-us/" target="_blank"/>, last access: 1 September 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>Raisbeck et al.(1981)</label><mixed-citation>
Raisbeck, G. M., Yiou, F., Fruneau, M., Loiseaux, J. M., Lieuvin, M., and Ravel, J. C.: Cosmogenic <sup>10</sup>Be∕<sup>7</sup>Be as a probe of atmospheric transport processes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 8, 1015–1018,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/GL008i009p01015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/GL008i009p01015</a>, 1981.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>Raukunen et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Raukunen, O., Vainio, R., Tylka, A. J., Dietrich, W. F., Jiggens, P., Heynderickx, D., Dierckxsens, M., Crosby, N., Ganse, U., and Siipola, R.: Two solar proton fluence models based on ground level enhancement observations, J. Space Weather Spac., 8, A04,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2017031" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2017031</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>Roeckner et al.(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
Roeckner, E., Bauml, G., Bonaventura, L., Brokopf, R., Esch, M., Giorgetta, M., Hagemann, S., Kirchner, I., Kornblueh, L., Manzini, E., Rhodin, A., Schlese, U., Schulzweida, U., and Tompkins, A.: The atmospheric general circulation model ECHAM5, PART I: Model description, Tech. rep., Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, MPI-Report 349,  available at: <a href="http://www.mpimet.mpg.de/fileadmin/publikationen/Reports/max scirep 349.pdf" target="_blank"/> (last access: 1 September 2021), 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>Steinhilber et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Steinhilber, F., Abreu, J., Beer, J., Brunner, I., Christl, M., Fischer, H., Heikkilae, U., Kubik, P., Mann, M., McCracken, K., Miller, H., Miyahara, H., Oerter, H., and Wilhelms, F.: 9,400 years of cosmic radiation and solar activity from ice cores and tree rings, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 109, 5967–5971,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1118965109" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1118965109</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>Stenke et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Stenke, A., Schraner, M., Rozanov, E., Egorova, T., Luo, B., and Peter, T.: The SOCOL version 3.0 chemistry–climate model: description, evaluation, and implications from an advanced transport algorithm, Geosci. Model Dev., 6, 1407–1427,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-1407-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-1407-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>Sukhodolov et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Sukhodolov, T., Usoskin, I., Rozanov, E., Asvestari, E., Ball, W., Curran, M., Fischer, H., Kovaltsov, G., Miyake, F., Peter, T., Plummer, C., Schmutz, W., Severi, M., and Traversi, R.: Atmospheric impacts of the strongest known solar particle storm of 775 AD, Sci. Rep.-UK, 7, 45257,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep45257" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/srep45257</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>Terzi et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
Terzi, L., Wotawa, G., Schoeppner, M., Kalinowski, M., Saey, P. R. J., Steinmann, P., Luan, L., and Staten, P. W.: Radioisotopes demonstrate changes in global atmospheric circulation possibly caused by global warming, Sci. Rep.-UK, 10, 10695,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-66541-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-66541-5</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>Thébault et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Thébault, E., Finlay, C. C., Beggan, C. D., Alken, P., Aubert, J., Barrois, O., Bertrand, F., Bondar, T., Boness, A., Brocco, L., Canet, E., Chambodut, A., Chulliat, A., Coïsson, P., Civet, F., Du, A., Fournier, A., Fratter, I., Gillet, N., Hamilton, B., Hamoudi, M., Hulot, G., Jager, T., Korte, M., Kuang, W., Lalanne, X., Langlais, B., Léger, J.-M., Lesur, V., Lowes, F. J., Macmillan, S., Mandea, M., Manoj, C., Maus, S., Olsen, N., Petrov, V., Ridley, V., Rother, M., Sabaka, T. J., Saturnino, D., Schachtschneider, R., Sirol, O., Tangborn, A., Thomson, A., Tøffner-Clausen, L., Vigneron, P., Wardinski, I., and Zvereva, T.: International Geomagnetic Reference Field: the 12th generation, Earth Planets Space, 67, 79,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-015-0228-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-015-0228-9</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>Tiedtke(1989)</label><mixed-citation>
Tiedtke, M.: A comprehensive mass flux scheme for cumulus parameterization in large-scale models, Mon. Weather Rev., 117, 1779–1800, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>Tost et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Tost, H., Jöckel, P., Kerkweg, A., Pozzer, A., Sander, R., and Lelieveld, J.: Global cloud and precipitation chemistry and wet deposition: tropospheric model simulations with ECHAM5/MESSy1, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 2733–2757,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-2733-2007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-2733-2007</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>Tost et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Tost, H., Lawrence, M. G., Brühl, C., Jöckel, P., The GABRIEL Team, and The SCOUT-O3-DARWIN/ACTIVE Team: Uncertainties in atmospheric chemistry modelling due to convection parameterisations and subsequent scavenging, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 1931–1951,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1931-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1931-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>Usoskin and Kovaltsov(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Usoskin, I. and Kovaltsov, G.: Production of cosmogenic <sup>7</sup>Be isotope in the atmosphere: Full 3D modelling, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D12107,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009725" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009725</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>Usoskin et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Usoskin, I., Solanki, S., Kovaltsov, G., Beer, J., and Kromer, B.: Solar proton events in cosmogenic isotope data, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L08107,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL026059" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL026059</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>Usoskin et al.(2020a)</label><mixed-citation>
Usoskin, I., Koldobskiy, S., Kovaltsov, G., Rozanov, E., Sukhodolov, T., Mishev, A., and Mironova, I.: Revisited Reference Solar Proton Event of 23 February 1956: Assessment of the Cosmogenic-Isotope Method Sensitivity to Extreme Solar Events, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 125, e27921,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JA027921" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JA027921</a>, 2020a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>Usoskin et al.(2020b)</label><mixed-citation>
Usoskin, I., Koldobskiy, S., Kovaltsov, G. A., Gil, A., Usoskina, I., Willamo, T., and Ibragimov, A.: Revised GLE database: Fluences of solar energetic particles as measured by the neutron-monitor network since 1956, Astron. Astrophys., 640, A17,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202038272" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202038272</a>, 2020b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>Usoskin(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Usoskin, I. G.: A History of Solar Activity over Millennia, Living Rev. Sol. Phys., 14, 3,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s41116-017-0006-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s41116-017-0006-9</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>Usoskin et al.(2009a)</label><mixed-citation>
Usoskin, I. G., Field, C. V., Schmidt, G. A., Leppänen, A.-P., Aldahan, A., Kovaltsov, G. A., Possnert, G., and Ungar, R. K.: Short-term production and synoptic influences on atmospheric <sup>7</sup>Be concentrations, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D06108,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011333" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011333</a>, 2009a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>Usoskin et al.(2009b)</label><mixed-citation>
Usoskin, I. G., Horiuchi, K., Solanki, S., Kovaltsov, G. A., and Bard, E.: On the common solar signal in different cosmogenic isotope data sets, J. Geophys. Res., 114, A03112,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JA013888" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JA013888</a>, 2009b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>Usoskin et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Usoskin, I. G., Mironova, I. A., Korte, M., and Kovaltsov, G. A.: Regional millennial trend in the cosmic ray induced ionization of the troposphere, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phy., 72, 19–25,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2009.10.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2009.10.003</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>Usoskin et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Usoskin, I. G., Gil, A., Kovaltsov, G. A., Mishev, A. L., and Mikhailov, V. V.: Heliospheric modulation of cosmic rays during the neutron monitor era: Calibration using PAMELA data for 2006–2010, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 122, 3875–3887,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA023819" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA023819</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>Vainio et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Vainio, R., Desorgher, L., Heynderickx, D., Storini, M., Flückiger, E., Horne, R. B., Kovaltsov, G. A., Kudela, K., Laurenza, M., McKenna-Lawlor, S., Rothkaehl, H., and Usoskin, I. G.: Dynamics of the Earth's particle radiation environment, Space Sci. Rev., 147, 187–231,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-009-9496-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-009-9496-7</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>Weisenstein et al.(1997)</label><mixed-citation>
Weisenstein, D. K., Yue, G. K., Ko, M. K. W., Sze, N.-D., Rodriguez, J. M., and Scott, C. J.: A two-dimensional model of sulfur species and aerosols, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 102, 13019–13035,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD00901" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD00901</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>Weisenstein et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Weisenstein, D. K., Keith, D. W., and Dykema, J. A.: Solar geoengineering using solid aerosol in the stratosphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 11835–11859,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11835-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11835-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>Wesely(1989)</label><mixed-citation>
Wesely, M. L.: Parameterization of surface resistances to gaseous dry deposition in regional-scale numerical models, Atmos. Environ., 23, 1293–1304,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(89)90153-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(89)90153-4</a>, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>Wu et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Wu, C. J., Usoskin, I. G., Krivova, N., Kovaltsov, G. A., Baroni, M., Bard, E., and Solanki, S. K.: Solar activity over nine millennia: A consistent multi-proxy reconstruction, Astron. Astrophys., 615, A93,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201731892" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201731892</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>Zheng et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
Zheng, M., Sjolte, J., Adolphi, F., Aldahan, A., Possnert, G., Wu, M., and Muscheler, R.: Solar and meteorological influences on seasonal atmospheric <sup>7</sup>Be in Europe for 1975 to 2018, Chemosphere, 263, 128318,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128318" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128318</a>, 2021.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>Zhou et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Zhou, T., Geller, M. A., and Hamilton, K.: The roles of the Hadley circulation and downward control in tropical upwelling, J. Atmos. Sci., 63, 2740–2757,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3770.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3770.1</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
