Articles | Volume 14, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6177-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6177-2021
Model description paper
 | 
15 Oct 2021
Model description paper |  | 15 Oct 2021

S2P3-R v2.0: computationally efficient modelling of shelf seas on regional to global scales

Paul R. Halloran, Jennifer K. McWhorter, Beatriz Arellano Nava, Robert Marsh, and William Skirving

Related authors

Climate intervention using marine cloud brightening (MCB) compared with stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI) in the UKESM1 climate model
Jim M. Haywood, Andy Jones, Anthony C. Jones, Paul Halloran, and Philip J. Rasch
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 15305–15324, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-15305-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-15305-2023, 2023
Short summary
Global analysis of the controls on seawater dimethylsulfide spatial variability
George Manville, Thomas G. Bell, Jane P. Mulcahy, Rafel Simó, Martí Galí, Anoop S. Mahajan, Shrivardhan Hulswar, and Paul R. Halloran
Biogeosciences, 20, 1813–1828, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-1813-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-1813-2023, 2023
Short summary
Third revision of the global surface seawater dimethyl sulfide climatology (DMS-Rev3)
Shrivardhan Hulswar, Rafel Simó, Martí Galí, Thomas G. Bell, Arancha Lana, Swaleha Inamdar, Paul R. Halloran, George Manville, and Anoop Sharad Mahajan
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 2963–2987, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-2963-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-2963-2022, 2022
Short summary
Drivers of 21st Century carbon cycle variability in the North Atlantic Ocean
Matthew P. Couldrey, Kevin I. C. Oliver, Andrew Yool, Paul R. Halloran, and Eric P. Achterberg
Biogeosciences Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2019-16,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2019-16, 2019
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Inconsistent strategies to spin up models in CMIP5: implications for ocean biogeochemical model performance assessment
Roland Séférian, Marion Gehlen, Laurent Bopp, Laure Resplandy, James C. Orr, Olivier Marti, John P. Dunne, James R. Christian, Scott C. Doney, Tatiana Ilyina, Keith Lindsay, Paul R. Halloran, Christoph Heinze, Joachim Segschneider, Jerry Tjiputra, Olivier Aumont, and Anastasia Romanou
Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 1827–1851, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1827-2016,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1827-2016, 2016
Short summary

Related subject area

Oceanography
Comparison of the Coastal and Regional Ocean COmmunity model (CROCO) and NCAR-LES in non-hydrostatic simulations
Xiaoyu Fan, Baylor Fox-Kemper, Nobuhiro Suzuki, Qing Li, Patrick Marchesiello, Peter P. Sullivan, and Paul S. Hall
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4095–4113, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4095-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4095-2024, 2024
Short summary
Intercomparisons of Tracker v1.1 and four other ocean particle-tracking software packages in the Regional Ocean Modeling System
Jilian Xiong and Parker MacCready
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3341–3356, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3341-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3341-2024, 2024
Short summary
CAR36, a regional high-resolution ocean forecasting system for improving drift and beaching of Sargassum in the Caribbean archipelago
Sylvain Cailleau, Laurent Bessières, Léonel Chiendje, Flavie Dubost, Guillaume Reffray, Jean-Michel Lellouche, Simon van Gennip, Charly Régnier, Marie Drevillon, Marc Tressol, Matthieu Clavier, Julien Temple-Boyer, and Léo Berline
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3157–3173, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3157-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3157-2024, 2024
Short summary
Implementation of additional spectral wave field exchanges in a three-dimensional wave–current coupled WAVEWATCH-III (version 6.07) and CROCO (version 1.2) configuration: assessment of their implications for macro-tidal coastal hydrodynamics
Gaetano Porcile, Anne-Claire Bennis, Martial Boutet, Sophie Le Bot, Franck Dumas, and Swen Jullien
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2829–2853, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2829-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2829-2024, 2024
Short summary
Comparison of 4-dimensional variational and ensemble optimal interpolation data assimilation systems using a Regional Ocean Modeling System (v3.4) configuration of the eddy-dominated East Australian Current system
Colette Gabrielle Kerry, Moninya Roughan, Shane Keating, David Gwyther, Gary Brassington, Adil Siripatana, and Joao Marcos A. C. Souza
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2359–2386, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2359-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2359-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Amante, C. and Eakins, B. W.: ETOPO1 1 Arc-Minute Global Relief Model: Procedures, Data Sources and Analysis, NOAA Tech. Memo., NESDIS NGDC-24, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.769615, 2009. 
Australian Institute of Marine Science (AIMS): NRSYON: Northern Australia Automated Marine Weather and Oceanographic Stations, Sites: [Yongala], https://doi.org/10.25845/5c09bf93f315d, 2020. 
Bahamondes Dominguez, A. A., Hickman, A. E., Marsh, R., and Moore, C. M.: Constraining the response of phytoplankton to zooplankton grazing and photo-acclimation in a temperate shelf sea with a 1-D model – towards S2P3 v8.0, Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 4019–4040, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4019-2020, 2020. 
Barnes, M. K., Tilstone, G. H., Suggett, D. J., Widdicombe, C. E., Bruun, J., Martinez-Vicente, V., and Smyth, T. J.: Temporal variability in total, micro- and nano-phytoplankton primary production at a coastal site in the Western English Channel, Prog. Oceanogr., 137 (Part B), 470–483​​​​​​​, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2015.04.017, 2015. 
Beaman, R.: Project 3DGBR: a high-resolution depth model for the Great Barrier Reef and Coral Sea, MTSRF Final Report Project 2.5i.1a, Reef and Rainforest Research Centre MTSRF Final Report Marine and Tropical Sciences Research Facility, James Cook University, available at: https://www.deepreef.org/images/stories/publications/reports/Project3DGBRFinal_RRRC2010.pdf (last access: 1 July 2021), ​​​​​​​2010. 
Download
Short summary
This paper describes the latest version of a simple model for simulating coastal oceanography in response to changes in weather and climate. The latest revision of this model makes scientific improvements but focuses on improvements that allow the model to be run simply at large scales and for long periods of time to explore the implications of (for example) future climate change along large areas of coastline.