- About
- Editorial board
- Articles
- Special issues
- Highlight articles
- Manuscript tracking
- Subscribe to alerts
- Peer-review process
- For authors
- For editors and referees
- EGU publications
Journal cover
Journal topic
Geoscientific Model Development
An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic
- About
- Editorial board
- Articles
- Special issues
- Highlight articles
- Manuscript tracking
- Subscribe to alerts
- Peer-review process
- For authors
- For editors and referees
- EGU publications
Journal metrics
Journal metrics
IF 5.240
5.768CiteScore
8.9SNIP 1.713
SJR 3.18
index 71h5-index 51
Abstracted/indexed
Abstracted/indexed
GMD | Articles | Volume 12, issue 11
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 4781–4802, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4781-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4781-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 4781–4802, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4781-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4781-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Model description paper 20 Nov 2019
Model description paper | 20 Nov 2019
A new model of the coupled carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus cycles in the terrestrial biosphere (QUINCY v1.0; revision 1996)
Tea Thum et al.
Related authors
Tea Thum, Julia E. S. M. Nabel, Aki Tsuruta, Tuula Aalto, Edward J. Dlugokencky, Jari Liski, Ingrid T. Luijkx, Tiina Markkanen, Julia Pongratz, Yukio Yoshida, and Sönke Zaehle
Biogeosciences Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2020-7, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2020-7, 2020
Revised manuscript under review for BG
Short summary
Short summary
Global vegetation models are important tools in estimating the impacts of global climate change. The fate of soil carbon is of upmost importance, as its emissions to atmosphere will enhance atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration. To evaluate the skill of the global vegetation models to model the soil carbon and its responses to environmental factors, it is important to use different data sources. We evaluated two different soil carbon models by using atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations.
Jarmo Mäkelä, Jürgen Knauer, Mika Aurela, Andrew Black, Martin Heimann, Hideki Kobayashi, Annalea Lohila, Ivan Mammarella, Hank Margolis, Tiina Markkanen, Jouni Susiluoto, Tea Thum, Toni Viskari, Sönke Zaehle, and Tuula Aalto
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 4075–4098, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4075-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4075-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
We assess the differences of six stomatal conductance formulations, embedded into a land–vegetation model JSBACH, on 10 boreal coniferous evergreen forest sites. We calibrate the model parameters using all six functions in a multi-year experiment, as well as for a separate drought event at one of the sites, using the adaptive population importance sampler. The analysis reveals weaknesses in the stomatal conductance formulation-dependent model behaviour that we are able to partially amend.
Yao Gao, Tiina Markkanen, Mika Aurela, Ivan Mammarella, Tea Thum, Aki Tsuruta, Huiyi Yang, and Tuula Aalto
Biogeosciences, 14, 4409–4422, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-4409-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-4409-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
We investigated the response of water use efficiency (WUE) to summer drought in a boreal Scots pine forest (Pinus sylvestris) on the daily time scale mainly using EC flux data from the Hyytiälä (southern Finland) flux site. Simulation results from the JSBACH land surface model were also evaluated against the observed results. The performance of three WUE metrics at the ecosystem level (EWUE, IWUE, and uWUE) during the severe summer drought were studied and showed different results.
Tea Thum, Sönke Zaehle, Philipp Köhler, Tuula Aalto, Mika Aurela, Luis Guanter, Pasi Kolari, Tuomas Laurila, Annalea Lohila, Federico Magnani, Christiaan Van Der Tol, and Tiina Markkanen
Biogeosciences, 14, 1969–1987, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-1969-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-1969-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
Modelling seasonal cycle at the coniferous forests poses a challenge. We implemented a model for sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) to a land surface model JSBACH. It was used to study the seasonality of the carbon cycle in the Fenno-Scandinavian region. Comparison was made to direct CO2 flux measurements and satellite observations of SIF. SIF proved to be a better proxy for photosynthesis than the fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation.
Y. Gao, T. Markkanen, T. Thum, M. Aurela, A. Lohila, I. Mammarella, M. Kämäräinen, S. Hagemann, and T. Aalto
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 175–191, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-175-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-175-2016, 2016
Andrew J. Wiltshire, Eleanor J. Burke, Sarah E. Chadburn, Chris D. Jones, Peter M. Cox, Taraka Davies-Barnard, Pierre Friedlingstein, Anna B. Harper, Spencer Liddicoat, Stephen A. Sitch, and Sonke Zaehle
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2020-205, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2020-205, 2020
Preprint under review for GMD
Short summary
Short summary
Limited nitrogen availbility can restrict the growth of plants and their ability to assimilate carbon. It is important to include the impact of this process on the global land carbon cycle. This paper presents a model of the coupled land carbon and nitrogen cycle which is included within the UK Earth System model to improve projections of cliamte change and impacts on ecosystems.
Shufen Pan, Naiqing Pan, Hanqin Tian, Pierre Friedlingstein, Stephen Sitch, Hao Shi, Vivek K. Arora, Vanessa Haverd, Atul K. Jain, Etsushi Kato, Sebastian Lienert, Danica Lombardozzi, Julia E. M. S. Nabel, Catherine Ottlé, Benjamin Poulter, Sönke Zaehle, and Steven W. Running
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 1485–1509, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-1485-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-1485-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Evapotranspiration (ET) links global water, carbon and energy cycles. We used 4 remote sensing models, 2 machine-learning algorithms and 14 land surface models to analyze the changes in global terrestrial ET. These three categories of approaches agreed well in terms of ET intensity. For 1982–2011, all models showed that Earth greening enhanced terrestrial ET. The small interannual variability of global terrestrial ET suggests it has a potential planetary boundary of around 600 mm yr-1.
Lin Yu, Bernhard Ahrens, Thomas Wutzler, Marion Schrumpf, and Sönke Zaehle
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 783–803, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-783-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-783-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
In this paper, we have developed a new soil organic carbon model that describes the formation and turnover of soil organic matter in a more mechanistic manner. With this model, we are able to better represent how microorganisms and nutrient processes influence the below-ground carbon storage and better explain some observed features of soil organic matter. We hope this model can increase our confidence in predictions of future climate change, particularly on how soil can mitigate the process.
Tea Thum, Julia E. S. M. Nabel, Aki Tsuruta, Tuula Aalto, Edward J. Dlugokencky, Jari Liski, Ingrid T. Luijkx, Tiina Markkanen, Julia Pongratz, Yukio Yoshida, and Sönke Zaehle
Biogeosciences Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2020-7, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2020-7, 2020
Revised manuscript under review for BG
Short summary
Short summary
Global vegetation models are important tools in estimating the impacts of global climate change. The fate of soil carbon is of upmost importance, as its emissions to atmosphere will enhance atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration. To evaluate the skill of the global vegetation models to model the soil carbon and its responses to environmental factors, it is important to use different data sources. We evaluated two different soil carbon models by using atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations.
Taraka Davies-Barnard, Johannes Meyerholt, Sönke Zaehle, Pierre Friedlingstein, Victor Brovkin, Yuanchao Fan, Rosie A. Fisher, Chris D. Jones, Hanna Lee, Daniele Peano, Benjamin Smith, David Wårlind, and Andy Wiltshire
Biogeosciences Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2019-513, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2019-513, 2020
Preprint under review for BG
Pierre Friedlingstein, Matthew W. Jones, Michael O'Sullivan, Robbie M. Andrew, Judith Hauck, Glen P. Peters, Wouter Peters, Julia Pongratz, Stephen Sitch, Corinne Le Quéré, Dorothee C. E. Bakker, Josep G. Canadell, Philippe Ciais, Robert B. Jackson, Peter Anthoni, Leticia Barbero, Ana Bastos, Vladislav Bastrikov, Meike Becker, Laurent Bopp, Erik Buitenhuis, Naveen Chandra, Frédéric Chevallier, Louise P. Chini, Kim I. Currie, Richard A. Feely, Marion Gehlen, Dennis Gilfillan, Thanos Gkritzalis, Daniel S. Goll, Nicolas Gruber, Sören Gutekunst, Ian Harris, Vanessa Haverd, Richard A. Houghton, George Hurtt, Tatiana Ilyina, Atul K. Jain, Emilie Joetzjer, Jed O. Kaplan, Etsushi Kato, Kees Klein Goldewijk, Jan Ivar Korsbakken, Peter Landschützer, Siv K. Lauvset, Nathalie Lefèvre, Andrew Lenton, Sebastian Lienert, Danica Lombardozzi, Gregg Marland, Patrick C. McGuire, Joe R. Melton, Nicolas Metzl, David R. Munro, Julia E. M. S. Nabel, Shin-Ichiro Nakaoka, Craig Neill, Abdirahman M. Omar, Tsuneo Ono, Anna Peregon, Denis Pierrot, Benjamin Poulter, Gregor Rehder, Laure Resplandy, Eddy Robertson, Christian Rödenbeck, Roland Séférian, Jörg Schwinger, Naomi Smith, Pieter P. Tans, Hanqin Tian, Bronte Tilbrook, Francesco N. Tubiello, Guido R. van der Werf, Andrew J. Wiltshire, and Sönke Zaehle
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 11, 1783–1838, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-1783-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-1783-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
The Global Carbon Budget 2019 describes the data sets and methodology used to quantify the emissions of carbon dioxide and their partitioning among the atmosphere, land, and ocean. These living data are updated every year to provide the highest transparency and traceability in the reporting of CO2, the key driver of climate change.
Nicolas Vuichard, Palmira Messina, Sebastiaan Luyssaert, Bertrand Guenet, Sönke Zaehle, Josefine Ghattas, Vladislav Bastrikov, and Philippe Peylin
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 4751–4779, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4751-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4751-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
In this research, we present a new version of the global terrestrial ecosystem model ORCHIDEE in which carbon and nitrogen cycles are coupled. We evaluate its skills at simulating primary production at 78 sites and at a global scale. Based on a set of additional simulations in which carbon and nitrogen cycles are coupled and uncoupled, we show that the functional responses of the model with carbon–nitrogen interactions better agree with our current understanding of photosynthesis.
Jarmo Mäkelä, Jürgen Knauer, Mika Aurela, Andrew Black, Martin Heimann, Hideki Kobayashi, Annalea Lohila, Ivan Mammarella, Hank Margolis, Tiina Markkanen, Jouni Susiluoto, Tea Thum, Toni Viskari, Sönke Zaehle, and Tuula Aalto
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 4075–4098, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4075-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4075-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
We assess the differences of six stomatal conductance formulations, embedded into a land–vegetation model JSBACH, on 10 boreal coniferous evergreen forest sites. We calibrate the model parameters using all six functions in a multi-year experiment, as well as for a separate drought event at one of the sites, using the adaptive population importance sampler. The analysis reveals weaknesses in the stomatal conductance formulation-dependent model behaviour that we are able to partially amend.
Karel Castro-Morales, Gregor Schürmann, Christoph Köstler, Christian Rödenbeck, Martin Heimann, and Sönke Zaehle
Biogeosciences, 16, 3009–3032, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-3009-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-3009-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
To obtain nearly 30 years of global terrestrial carbon fluxes, we simultaneously incorporated in a land surface model three different time periods of two observational data sets: absorbed photosynthetic active radiation and atmospheric CO2 concentrations. One decade of data is enough to improve the modeled long-term trends and seasonal amplitudes of the assimilated variables, particularly in boreal regions. This model has the potential to provide short-term predictions of land carbon fluxes.
Mingkai Jiang, Sönke Zaehle, Martin G. De Kauwe, Anthony P. Walker, Silvia Caldararu, David S. Ellsworth, and Belinda E. Medlyn
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 2069–2089, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2069-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2069-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Here we used a simple analytical framework developed by Comins and McMurtrie (1993) to investigate how different model assumptions affected plant responses to elevated CO2. This framework is useful in revealing both the consequences and the mechanisms through which different assumptions affect predictions. We therefore recommend the use of this framework to analyze the likely outcomes of new assumptions before introducing them to complex model structures.
Corinne Le Quéré, Robbie M. Andrew, Pierre Friedlingstein, Stephen Sitch, Judith Hauck, Julia Pongratz, Penelope A. Pickers, Jan Ivar Korsbakken, Glen P. Peters, Josep G. Canadell, Almut Arneth, Vivek K. Arora, Leticia Barbero, Ana Bastos, Laurent Bopp, Frédéric Chevallier, Louise P. Chini, Philippe Ciais, Scott C. Doney, Thanos Gkritzalis, Daniel S. Goll, Ian Harris, Vanessa Haverd, Forrest M. Hoffman, Mario Hoppema, Richard A. Houghton, George Hurtt, Tatiana Ilyina, Atul K. Jain, Truls Johannessen, Chris D. Jones, Etsushi Kato, Ralph F. Keeling, Kees Klein Goldewijk, Peter Landschützer, Nathalie Lefèvre, Sebastian Lienert, Zhu Liu, Danica Lombardozzi, Nicolas Metzl, David R. Munro, Julia E. M. S. Nabel, Shin-ichiro Nakaoka, Craig Neill, Are Olsen, Tsueno Ono, Prabir Patra, Anna Peregon, Wouter Peters, Philippe Peylin, Benjamin Pfeil, Denis Pierrot, Benjamin Poulter, Gregor Rehder, Laure Resplandy, Eddy Robertson, Matthias Rocher, Christian Rödenbeck, Ute Schuster, Jörg Schwinger, Roland Séférian, Ingunn Skjelvan, Tobias Steinhoff, Adrienne Sutton, Pieter P. Tans, Hanqin Tian, Bronte Tilbrook, Francesco N. Tubiello, Ingrid T. van der Laan-Luijkx, Guido R. van der Werf, Nicolas Viovy, Anthony P. Walker, Andrew J. Wiltshire, Rebecca Wright, Sönke Zaehle, and Bo Zheng
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 10, 2141–2194, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-2141-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-2141-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
The Global Carbon Budget 2018 describes the data sets and methodology used to quantify the emissions of carbon dioxide and their partitioning among the atmosphere, land, and ocean. These living data are updated every year to provide the highest transparency and traceability in the reporting of CO2, the key driver of climate change.
Martina Franz, Rocio Alonso, Almut Arneth, Patrick Büker, Susana Elvira, Giacomo Gerosa, Lisa Emberson, Zhaozhong Feng, Didier Le Thiec, Riccardo Marzuoli, Elina Oksanen, Johan Uddling, Matthew Wilkinson, and Sönke Zaehle
Biogeosciences, 15, 6941–6957, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-6941-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-6941-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
Four published ozone damage functions previously used in terrestrial biosphere models were evaluated regarding their ability to simulate observed biomass dose–response relationships using the O-CN model. Neither damage function was able to reproduce the observed ozone-induced biomass reductions. Calibrating a plant-functional-type-specific relationship between accumulated ozone uptake and leaf-level photosynthesis did lead to a good agreement between observed and modelled ozone damage.
Yilong Wang, Philippe Ciais, Daniel Goll, Yuanyuan Huang, Yiqi Luo, Ying-Ping Wang, A. Anthony Bloom, Grégoire Broquet, Jens Hartmann, Shushi Peng, Josep Penuelas, Shilong Piao, Jordi Sardans, Benjamin D. Stocker, Rong Wang, Sönke Zaehle, and Sophie Zechmeister-Boltenstern
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 3903–3928, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3903-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3903-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
We present a new modeling framework called Global Observation-based Land-ecosystems Utilization Model of Carbon, Nitrogen and Phosphorus (GOLUM-CNP) that combines a data-constrained C-cycle analysis with data-driven estimates of N and P inputs and losses and with observed stoichiometric ratios. GOLUM-CNP provides a traceable tool, where a consistency between different datasets of global C, N, and P cycles has been achieved.
Johannes Meyerholt and Sönke Zaehle
Biogeosciences, 15, 5677–5698, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-5677-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-5677-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
Terrestrial biosphere models employ various representations of ecosystem nitrogen loss, some based on soil N availability, some based on net N mineralization. We show in local and global simulations that this variety leads to pronounced uncertainty in the predicted magnitude and sign of ecosystem N loss change under elevated CO2. Suprisingly, this uncertainty barely affects predicted carbon storage responses to elevated CO2, illustrating the need for new benchmarks especially in the boreal zone.
Werner von Bloh, Sibyll Schaphoff, Christoph Müller, Susanne Rolinski, Katharina Waha, and Sönke Zaehle
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 2789–2812, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2789-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2789-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
The dynamics of the terrestrial carbon cycle are of central importance for Earth system science. Nutrient limitations, especially from nitrogen, are important constraints on vegetation growth and the terrestrial carbon cycle. We extended the well-established global vegetation, hydrology, and crop model LPJmL with a nitrogen cycle. We find significant improvement in global patterns of crop productivity. Regional differences in crop productivity can now be largely reproduced by the model.
Karel Castro-Morales, Thomas Kleinen, Sonja Kaiser, Sönke Zaehle, Fanny Kittler, Min Jung Kwon, Christian Beer, and Mathias Göckede
Biogeosciences, 15, 2691–2722, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-2691-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-2691-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
We present year-round methane emissions from wetlands in Northeast Siberia that were simulated with a land surface model. Ground-based flux measurements from the same area were used for evaluation of the model results, finding a best agreement with the observations in the summertime emissions that take place in this region predominantly through plants. During winter, methane emissions through the snow contribute 4 % of the total annual methane budget, but these are still underestimated.
Christian Rödenbeck, Sönke Zaehle, Ralph Keeling, and Martin Heimann
Biogeosciences, 15, 2481–2498, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-2481-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-2481-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
In this paper we investigate how the CO2 exchange between the land vegetation and the atmosphere varies from year to year. We quantify the relation between variations in the CO2 exchange and variations in air temperature. For this quantification, we use long-term measurements of CO2 in the air at many locations, a simulation code for the transport of carbon dioxide through the atmosphere, and a data set of air temperature. The results help us to understand the mechanisms of CO2 exchange.
Corinne Le Quéré, Robbie M. Andrew, Pierre Friedlingstein, Stephen Sitch, Julia Pongratz, Andrew C. Manning, Jan Ivar Korsbakken, Glen P. Peters, Josep G. Canadell, Robert B. Jackson, Thomas A. Boden, Pieter P. Tans, Oliver D. Andrews, Vivek K. Arora, Dorothee C. E. Bakker, Leticia Barbero, Meike Becker, Richard A. Betts, Laurent Bopp, Frédéric Chevallier, Louise P. Chini, Philippe Ciais, Catherine E. Cosca, Jessica Cross, Kim Currie, Thomas Gasser, Ian Harris, Judith Hauck, Vanessa Haverd, Richard A. Houghton, Christopher W. Hunt, George Hurtt, Tatiana Ilyina, Atul K. Jain, Etsushi Kato, Markus Kautz, Ralph F. Keeling, Kees Klein Goldewijk, Arne Körtzinger, Peter Landschützer, Nathalie Lefèvre, Andrew Lenton, Sebastian Lienert, Ivan Lima, Danica Lombardozzi, Nicolas Metzl, Frank Millero, Pedro M. S. Monteiro, David R. Munro, Julia E. M. S. Nabel, Shin-ichiro Nakaoka, Yukihiro Nojiri, X. Antonio Padin, Anna Peregon, Benjamin Pfeil, Denis Pierrot, Benjamin Poulter, Gregor Rehder, Janet Reimer, Christian Rödenbeck, Jörg Schwinger, Roland Séférian, Ingunn Skjelvan, Benjamin D. Stocker, Hanqin Tian, Bronte Tilbrook, Francesco N. Tubiello, Ingrid T. van der Laan-Luijkx, Guido R. van der Werf, Steven van Heuven, Nicolas Viovy, Nicolas Vuichard, Anthony P. Walker, Andrew J. Watson, Andrew J. Wiltshire, Sönke Zaehle, and Dan Zhu
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 10, 405–448, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-405-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-405-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
The Global Carbon Budget 2017 describes data sets and methodology to quantify the five major components of the global carbon budget and their uncertainties. It is the 12th annual update and the 6th published in this journal.
Wei Li, Philippe Ciais, Shushi Peng, Chao Yue, Yilong Wang, Martin Thurner, Sassan S. Saatchi, Almut Arneth, Valerio Avitabile, Nuno Carvalhais, Anna B. Harper, Etsushi Kato, Charles Koven, Yi Y. Liu, Julia E.M.S. Nabel, Yude Pan, Julia Pongratz, Benjamin Poulter, Thomas A. M. Pugh, Maurizio Santoro, Stephen Sitch, Benjamin D. Stocker, Nicolas Viovy, Andy Wiltshire, Rasoul Yousefpour, and Sönke Zaehle
Biogeosciences, 14, 5053–5067, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-5053-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-5053-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
We used several observation-based biomass datasets to constrain the historical land-use change carbon emissions simulated by models. Compared to the range of the original modeled emissions (from 94 to 273 Pg C), the observationally constrained global cumulative emission estimate is 155 ± 50 Pg C (1σ Gaussian error) from 1901 to 2012. Our approach can also be applied to evaluate the LULCC impact of land-based climate mitigation policies.
Daniel S. Goll, Nicolas Vuichard, Fabienne Maignan, Albert Jornet-Puig, Jordi Sardans, Aurelie Violette, Shushi Peng, Yan Sun, Marko Kvakic, Matthieu Guimberteau, Bertrand Guenet, Soenke Zaehle, Josep Penuelas, Ivan Janssens, and Philippe Ciais
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 3745–3770, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3745-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3745-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
We describe a representation of the terrestrial phosphorus cycle for the ORCHIDEE land surface model. The model is able to reproduce the observed shift from nitrogen to phosphorus limited net primary productivity along a soil formation chronosequence in Hawaii, as well as the contrasting responses of net primary productivity to nutrient addition. However, the simulated nutrient use efficiencies are lower, as observed primarily due to biases in the nutrient content and turnover of woody biomass.
Yao Gao, Tiina Markkanen, Mika Aurela, Ivan Mammarella, Tea Thum, Aki Tsuruta, Huiyi Yang, and Tuula Aalto
Biogeosciences, 14, 4409–4422, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-4409-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-4409-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
We investigated the response of water use efficiency (WUE) to summer drought in a boreal Scots pine forest (Pinus sylvestris) on the daily time scale mainly using EC flux data from the Hyytiälä (southern Finland) flux site. Simulation results from the JSBACH land surface model were also evaluated against the observed results. The performance of three WUE metrics at the ecosystem level (EWUE, IWUE, and uWUE) during the severe summer drought were studied and showed different results.
Tea Thum, Sönke Zaehle, Philipp Köhler, Tuula Aalto, Mika Aurela, Luis Guanter, Pasi Kolari, Tuomas Laurila, Annalea Lohila, Federico Magnani, Christiaan Van Der Tol, and Tiina Markkanen
Biogeosciences, 14, 1969–1987, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-1969-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-1969-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
Modelling seasonal cycle at the coniferous forests poses a challenge. We implemented a model for sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) to a land surface model JSBACH. It was used to study the seasonality of the carbon cycle in the Fenno-Scandinavian region. Comparison was made to direct CO2 flux measurements and satellite observations of SIF. SIF proved to be a better proxy for photosynthesis than the fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation.
Martina Franz, David Simpson, Almut Arneth, and Sönke Zaehle
Biogeosciences, 14, 45–71, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-45-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-45-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
Ozone is a toxic air pollutant that can damage plant leaves and impact their carbon uptake from the atmosphere. We extend a terrestrial biosphere model to account for ozone damage of plants and investigate the impact on the terrestrial carbon cycle. Our approach accounts for ozone transport from the free troposphere to leaf level. We find that this substantially affects simulated ozone uptake into the plants. Simulations indicate that ozone damages plants less than expected from previous studies
Corinne Le Quéré, Robbie M. Andrew, Josep G. Canadell, Stephen Sitch, Jan Ivar Korsbakken, Glen P. Peters, Andrew C. Manning, Thomas A. Boden, Pieter P. Tans, Richard A. Houghton, Ralph F. Keeling, Simone Alin, Oliver D. Andrews, Peter Anthoni, Leticia Barbero, Laurent Bopp, Frédéric Chevallier, Louise P. Chini, Philippe Ciais, Kim Currie, Christine Delire, Scott C. Doney, Pierre Friedlingstein, Thanos Gkritzalis, Ian Harris, Judith Hauck, Vanessa Haverd, Mario Hoppema, Kees Klein Goldewijk, Atul K. Jain, Etsushi Kato, Arne Körtzinger, Peter Landschützer, Nathalie Lefèvre, Andrew Lenton, Sebastian Lienert, Danica Lombardozzi, Joe R. Melton, Nicolas Metzl, Frank Millero, Pedro M. S. Monteiro, David R. Munro, Julia E. M. S. Nabel, Shin-ichiro Nakaoka, Kevin O'Brien, Are Olsen, Abdirahman M. Omar, Tsuneo Ono, Denis Pierrot, Benjamin Poulter, Christian Rödenbeck, Joe Salisbury, Ute Schuster, Jörg Schwinger, Roland Séférian, Ingunn Skjelvan, Benjamin D. Stocker, Adrienne J. Sutton, Taro Takahashi, Hanqin Tian, Bronte Tilbrook, Ingrid T. van der Laan-Luijkx, Guido R. van der Werf, Nicolas Viovy, Anthony P. Walker, Andrew J. Wiltshire, and Sönke Zaehle
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 8, 605–649, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-8-605-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-8-605-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
The Global Carbon Budget 2016 is the 11th annual update of emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) and their partitioning among the atmosphere, land, and ocean. This data synthesis brings together measurements, statistical information, and analyses of model results in order to provide an assessment of the global carbon budget and their uncertainties for years 1959 to 2015, with a projection for year 2016.
Fang Zhao, Ning Zeng, Ghassem Asrar, Pierre Friedlingstein, Akihiko Ito, Atul Jain, Eugenia Kalnay, Etsushi Kato, Charles D. Koven, Ben Poulter, Rashid Rafique, Stephen Sitch, Shijie Shu, Beni Stocker, Nicolas Viovy, Andy Wiltshire, and Sonke Zaehle
Biogeosciences, 13, 5121–5137, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-5121-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-5121-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
The increasing seasonality of atmospheric CO2 is strongly linked with enhanced land vegetation activities in the last 5 decades, for which the importance of increasing CO2, climate and land use/cover change was evaluated in single model studies (Zeng et al., 2014; Forkel et al., 2016). Here we examine the relative importance of these factors in multiple models. Our results highlight models can show similar results in some benchmarks with different underlying regional dynamics.
Gregor J. Schürmann, Thomas Kaminski, Christoph Köstler, Nuno Carvalhais, Michael Voßbeck, Jens Kattge, Ralf Giering, Christian Rödenbeck, Martin Heimann, and Sönke Zaehle
Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 2999–3026, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-2999-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-2999-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
We describe the Max Planck Institute Carbon Cycle Data Assimilation System (MPI-CCDAS). The system improves the modelled carbon cycle of the terrestrial biosphere by systematically confronting (or assimilating) the model with observations of atmospheric CO2 and fractions of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation. Jointly assimilating both data streams outperforms the single-data stream experiments, thus showing the value of a multi-data stream assimilation.
Chris D. Jones, Vivek Arora, Pierre Friedlingstein, Laurent Bopp, Victor Brovkin, John Dunne, Heather Graven, Forrest Hoffman, Tatiana Ilyina, Jasmin G. John, Martin Jung, Michio Kawamiya, Charlie Koven, Julia Pongratz, Thomas Raddatz, James T. Randerson, and Sönke Zaehle
Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 2853–2880, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-2853-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-2853-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
How the carbon cycle interacts with climate will affect future climate change and how society plans emissions reductions to achieve climate targets. The Coupled Climate Carbon Cycle Model Intercomparison Project (C4MIP) is an endorsed activity of CMIP6 and aims to quantify these interactions and feedbacks in state-of-the-art climate models. This paper lays out the experimental protocol for modelling groups to follow to contribute to C4MIP. It is a contribution to the CMIP6 GMD Special Issue.
Johannes Meyerholt, Sönke Zaehle, and Matthew J. Smith
Biogeosciences, 13, 1491–1518, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-1491-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-1491-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
We investigated how today's state-of-the-art terrestrial biosphere models represent biological nitrogen fixation and what the consequences of varying representation are for model predictions under ambient conditions and under scenarios of elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations. We found that varying global nitrogen fixation rates are simulated under ambient conditions and that the responses of the simulated carbon and nitrogen cycles are significantly affected under perturbation.
Silvia Caldararu, Drew W. Purves, and Matthew J. Smith
Biogeosciences, 13, 925–941, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-925-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-925-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
The plant functional type (PFT) concept is widely used in global vegetation models but recent studies have attempted to replace this with a more biologically representative formulation by using plant traits. In this study we aim to quantify the performance of a data-constrained leaf phenology model that uses PFTs when compared to one that uses local traits. We show that the PFT model performs relatively poorly but we can identify a small number of traits that improve model performance.
Y. Gao, T. Markkanen, T. Thum, M. Aurela, A. Lohila, I. Mammarella, M. Kämäräinen, S. Hagemann, and T. Aalto
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 175–191, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-175-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-175-2016, 2016
G. Murray-Tortarolo, P. Friedlingstein, S. Sitch, V. J. Jaramillo, F. Murguía-Flores, A. Anav, Y. Liu, A. Arneth, A. Arvanitis, A. Harper, A. Jain, E. Kato, C. Koven, B. Poulter, B. D. Stocker, A. Wiltshire, S. Zaehle, and N. Zeng
Biogeosciences, 13, 223–238, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-223-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-223-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
We modelled the carbon (C) cycle in Mexico for three different time periods: past (20th century), present (2000-2005) and future (2006-2100). We used different available products to estimate C stocks and fluxes in the country. Contrary to other current estimates, our results showed that Mexico was a C sink and this is likely to continue in the next century (unless the most extreme climate-change scenarios are reached).
D. Fowler, C. E. Steadman, D. Stevenson, M. Coyle, R. M. Rees, U. M. Skiba, M. A. Sutton, J. N. Cape, A. J. Dore, M. Vieno, D. Simpson, S. Zaehle, B. D. Stocker, M. Rinaldi, M. C. Facchini, C. R. Flechard, E. Nemitz, M. Twigg, J. W. Erisman, K. Butterbach-Bahl, and J. N. Galloway
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 13849–13893, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-13849-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-13849-2015, 2015
C. Le Quéré, R. Moriarty, R. M. Andrew, J. G. Canadell, S. Sitch, J. I. Korsbakken, P. Friedlingstein, G. P. Peters, R. J. Andres, T. A. Boden, R. A. Houghton, J. I. House, R. F. Keeling, P. Tans, A. Arneth, D. C. E. Bakker, L. Barbero, L. Bopp, J. Chang, F. Chevallier, L. P. Chini, P. Ciais, M. Fader, R. A. Feely, T. Gkritzalis, I. Harris, J. Hauck, T. Ilyina, A. K. Jain, E. Kato, V. Kitidis, K. Klein Goldewijk, C. Koven, P. Landschützer, S. K. Lauvset, N. Lefèvre, A. Lenton, I. D. Lima, N. Metzl, F. Millero, D. R. Munro, A. Murata, J. E. M. S. Nabel, S. Nakaoka, Y. Nojiri, K. O'Brien, A. Olsen, T. Ono, F. F. Pérez, B. Pfeil, D. Pierrot, B. Poulter, G. Rehder, C. Rödenbeck, S. Saito, U. Schuster, J. Schwinger, R. Séférian, T. Steinhoff, B. D. Stocker, A. J. Sutton, T. Takahashi, B. Tilbrook, I. T. van der Laan-Luijkx, G. R. van der Werf, S. van Heuven, D. Vandemark, N. Viovy, A. Wiltshire, S. Zaehle, and N. Zeng
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 7, 349–396, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-7-349-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-7-349-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
Accurate assessment of anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions and their redistribution among the atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial biosphere is important to understand the global carbon cycle, support the development of climate policies, and project future climate change. We describe data sets and a methodology to quantify all major components of the global carbon budget, including their uncertainties, based on a range of data and models and their interpretation by a broad scientific community.
S. Olin, M. Lindeskog, T. A. M. Pugh, G. Schurgers, D. Wårlind, M. Mishurov, S. Zaehle, B. D. Stocker, B. Smith, and A. Arneth
Earth Syst. Dynam., 6, 745–768, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-6-745-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-6-745-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
Croplands are vital ecosystems for human well-being. Properly managed they can supply food, store carbon and even sequester carbon from the atmosphere. Conversely, if poorly managed, croplands can be a source of nitrogen to inland and coastal waters, causing algal blooms, and a source of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere, accentuating climate change. Here we studied cropland management types for their potential to store carbon and minimize nitrogen losses while maintaining crop yields.
M. H. Vermeulen, B. J. Kruijt, T. Hickler, and P. Kabat
Earth Syst. Dynam., 6, 485–503, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-6-485-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-6-485-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
We compared a process-based ecosystem model (LPJ-GUESS) with EC measurements to test whether observed interannual variability (IAV) in carbon and water fluxes can be reproduced because it is important to understand the driving mechanisms of IAV. We show that the model's mechanistic process representation for photosynthesis at low temperatures and during drought could be improved, but other process representations are still lacking in order to fully reproduce the observed IAV.
C. Le Quéré, G. P. Peters, R. J. Andres, R. M. Andrew, T. A. Boden, P. Ciais, P. Friedlingstein, R. A. Houghton, G. Marland, R. Moriarty, S. Sitch, P. Tans, A. Arneth, A. Arvanitis, D. C. E. Bakker, L. Bopp, J. G. Canadell, L. P. Chini, S. C. Doney, A. Harper, I. Harris, J. I. House, A. K. Jain, S. D. Jones, E. Kato, R. F. Keeling, K. Klein Goldewijk, A. Körtzinger, C. Koven, N. Lefèvre, F. Maignan, A. Omar, T. Ono, G.-H. Park, B. Pfeil, B. Poulter, M. R. Raupach, P. Regnier, C. Rödenbeck, S. Saito, J. Schwinger, J. Segschneider, B. D. Stocker, T. Takahashi, B. Tilbrook, S. van Heuven, N. Viovy, R. Wanninkhof, A. Wiltshire, and S. Zaehle
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 6, 235–263, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-6-235-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-6-235-2014, 2014
B. Smith, D. Wårlind, A. Arneth, T. Hickler, P. Leadley, J. Siltberg, and S. Zaehle
Biogeosciences, 11, 2027–2054, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-2027-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-2027-2014, 2014
S. Caldararu, D. W. Purves, and P. I. Palmer
Biogeosciences, 11, 763–778, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-763-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-763-2014, 2014
C. Le Quéré, R. J. Andres, T. Boden, T. Conway, R. A. Houghton, J. I. House, G. Marland, G. P. Peters, G. R. van der Werf, A. Ahlström, R. M. Andrew, L. Bopp, J. G. Canadell, P. Ciais, S. C. Doney, C. Enright, P. Friedlingstein, C. Huntingford, A. K. Jain, C. Jourdain, E. Kato, R. F. Keeling, K. Klein Goldewijk, S. Levis, P. Levy, M. Lomas, B. Poulter, M. R. Raupach, J. Schwinger, S. Sitch, B. D. Stocker, N. Viovy, S. Zaehle, and N. Zeng
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 5, 165–185, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-5-165-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-5-165-2013, 2013
Related subject area
Biogeosciences
Simulating stable carbon isotopes in the ocean component of the FAMOUS general circulation model with MOSES1 (XOAVI)
Quantitative assessment of fire and vegetation properties in simulations with fire-enabled vegetation models from the Fire Model Intercomparison Project
Marine biogeochemical cycling and oceanic CO2 uptake simulated by the NUIST Earth System Model version 3 (NESM v3)
CLASSIC v1.0: the open-source community successor to the Canadian Land Surface Scheme (CLASS) and the Canadian Terrestrial Ecosystem Model (CTEM) – Part 1: Model framework and site-level performance
HR3DHG version 1: modeling the spatiotemporal dynamics of mercury in the Augusta Bay (southern Italy)
BPOP-v1 model: exploring the impact of changes in the biological pump on the shelf sea and ocean nutrient and redox state
P-model v1.0: an optimality-based light use efficiency model for simulating ecosystem gross primary production
HETEROFOR 1.0: a spatially explicit model for exploring the response of structurally complex forests to uncertain future conditions – Part 2: Phenology and water cycle
Dynamic upscaling of decomposition kinetics for carbon cycling models
CE-DYNAM (v1): a spatially explicit process-based carbon erosion scheme for use in Earth system models
FLiES-SIF ver. 1.0: Three-dimensional radiative transfer model for estimating solar induced fluorescence
A coupled pelagic–benthic–sympagic biogeochemical model for the Bering Sea: documentation and validation of the BESTNPZ model (v2019.08.23) within a high-resolution regional ocean model
The importance of management information and soil moisture representation for simulating tillage effects on N2O emissions in LPJmL5.0-tillage
FORests and HYdrology under Climate Change in Switzerland v1.0: a spatially distributed model combining hydrology and forest dynamics
ORCHIDEE MICT-LEAK (r5459), a global model for the production, transport, and transformation of dissolved organic carbon from Arctic permafrost regions – Part 2: Model evaluation over the Lena River basin
Evaluation of CH4MODwetland and TEM models used to estimate global CH4 emissions from natural wetlands
Stoichiometrically coupled carbon and nitrogen cycling in the MIcrobial-MIneral Carbon Stabilization model (MIMICS-CN)
GLOBAL-FATE (version 1.0.0): A geographical information system (GIS)-based model for assessing contaminants fate in the global river network
A comparative assessment of the uncertainties of global surface ocean CO2 estimates using a machine-learning ensemble (CSIR-ML6 version 2019a) – have we hit the wall?
Improving the LPJmL4-SPITFIRE vegetation–fire model for South America using satellite data
Accounting for carbon and nitrogen interactions in the global terrestrial ecosystem model ORCHIDEE (trunk version, rev 4999): multi-scale evaluation of gross primary production
Modelling biomass burning emissions and the effect of spatial resolution: a case study for Africa based on the Global Fire Emissions Database (GFED)
A lattice-automaton bioturbation simulator with coupled physics, chemistry, and biology in marine sediments (eLABS v0.2)
The biophysics, ecology, and biogeochemistry of functionally diverse, vertically and horizontally heterogeneous ecosystems: the Ecosystem Demography model, version 2.2 – Part 1: Model description
The biophysics, ecology, and biogeochemistry of functionally diverse, vertically and horizontally heterogeneous ecosystems: the Ecosystem Demography model, version 2.2 – Part 2: Model evaluation for tropical South America
Identification of key parameters controlling demographically structured vegetation dynamics in a land surface model: CLM4.5(FATES)
Parameter calibration and stomatal conductance formulation comparison for boreal forests with adaptive population importance sampler in the land surface model JSBACH
Evaluation of leaf-level optical properties employed in land surface models
An improved mechanistic model for ammonia volatilization in Earth system models: Flow of Agricultural Nitrogen, version 2 (FANv2)
ORCHIDEE MICT-LEAK (r5459), a global model for the production, transport, and transformation of dissolved organic carbon from Arctic permafrost regions – Part 1: Rationale, model description, and simulation protocol
Short-term forecasting of regional biospheric CO2 fluxes in Europe using a light-use-efficiency model
Modelling northern peatland area and carbon dynamics since the Holocene with the ORCHIDEE-PEAT land surface model (SVN r5488)
Simulating the effect of tillage practices with the global ecosystem model LPJmL (version 5.0-tillage)
Description and validation of an intermediate complexity model for ecosystem photosynthesis and evapotranspiration: ACM-GPP-ETv1
The quasi-equilibrium framework revisited: analyzing long-term CO2 enrichment responses in plant–soil models
Bayesian inference and predictive performance of soil respiration models in the presence of model discrepancy
CO2 drawdown due to particle ballasting by glacial aeolian dust: an estimate based on the ocean carbon cycle model MPIOM/HAMOCC version 1.6.2p3
Towards end-to-end (E2E) modelling in a consistent NPZD-F modelling framework (ECOSMO E2E_v1.0): application to the North Sea and Baltic Sea
Evaluating the E3SM land model version 0 (ELMv0) at a temperate forest site using flux and soil water measurements
The [simple carbon project] model v1.0
MAgPIE 4 – a modular open-source framework for modeling global land systems
Realized ecological forecast through an interactive Ecological Platform for Assimilating Data (EcoPAD, v1.0) into models
LPJ-GM 1.0: simulating migration efficiently in a dynamic vegetation model
A single-column ocean biogeochemistry model (GOTM–TOPAZ) version 1.0
Interactive impacts of fire and vegetation dynamics on global carbon and water budget using Community Land Model version 4.5
Representation of fire, land-use change and vegetation dynamics in the Joint UK Land Environment Simulator vn4.9 (JULES)
Analysis fire patterns and drivers with a global SEVER-FIRE v1.0 model incorporated into dynamic global vegetation model and satellite and on-ground observations
A generic pixel-to-point comparison for simulated large-scale ecosystem properties and ground-based observations: an example from the Amazon region
Land surface model parameter optimisation using in situ flux data: comparison of gradient-based versus random search algorithms (a case study using ORCHIDEE v1.9.5.2)
Modeling the effects of litter stoichiometry and soil mineral N availability on soil organic matter formation using CENTURY-CUE (v1.0)
Jennifer E. Dentith, Ruza F. Ivanovic, Lauren J. Gregoire, Julia C. Tindall, and Laura F. Robinson
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 3529–3552, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3529-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3529-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We have added a new tracer (13C) into the ocean of the FAMOUS climate model to study large-scale circulation and the marine carbon cycle. The model captures the large-scale spatial pattern of observations but the simulated values are consistently higher than observed. In the first instance, our new tracer is therefore useful for recalibrating the physical and biogeochemical components of the model.
Stijn Hantson, Douglas I. Kelley, Almut Arneth, Sandy P. Harrison, Sally Archibald, Dominique Bachelet, Matthew Forrest, Thomas Hickler, Gitta Lasslop, Fang Li, Stephane Mangeon, Joe R. Melton, Lars Nieradzik, Sam S. Rabin, I. Colin Prentice, Tim Sheehan, Stephen Sitch, Lina Teckentrup, Apostolos Voulgarakis, and Chao Yue
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 3299–3318, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3299-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3299-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Global fire–vegetation models are widely used, but there has been limited evaluation of how well they represent various aspects of fire regimes. Here we perform a systematic evaluation of simulations made by nine FireMIP models in order to quantify their ability to reproduce a range of fire and vegetation benchmarks. While some FireMIP models are better at representing certain aspects of the fire regime, no model clearly outperforms all other models across the full range of variables assessed.
Yifei Dai, Long Cao, and Bin Wang
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 3119–3144, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3119-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3119-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
NESM v3 is one of the CMIP6 registered Earth system models. We evaluate its ocean carbon cycle component and present its present-day and future oceanic CO2 uptake based on the CMIP6 historical and SSP5–8.5 scenarios. We hope that this paper can serve as a documentation of the marine biogeochemical cycle in NESM v3. Also, the model defects found and their underlying causes analyzed in this paper could help users and further model development.
Joe R. Melton, Vivek K. Arora, Eduard Wisernig-Cojoc, Christian Seiler, Matthew Fortier, Ed Chan, and Lina Teckentrup
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 2825–2850, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2825-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2825-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We transitioned the CLASS-CTEM land surface model to an open-source community model format by modernizing the code base to make the model easier to use and understand, providing a complete software environment to run the model within, developing a benchmarking suite for model evaluation, and creating an infrastructure to support community involvement. The new model, the Canadian Land Surface Scheme including Biogeochemical Cycles (CLASSIC), is now available for the community to use and develop.
Giovanni Denaro, Daniela Salvagio Manta, Alessandro Borri, Maria Bonsignore, Davide Valenti, Enza Quinci, Andrea Cucco, Bernardo Spagnolo, Mario Sprovieri, and Andrea De Gaetano
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 2073–2093, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2073-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2073-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The HR3DHG (high-resolution 3D mercury model) investigates the spatiotemporal behavior, in seawater and marine sediments, of three mercury species (elemental, inorganic, and organic mercury) in a highly polluted marine environment (Augusta Bay, southern Italy). The model shows fair agreement with the experimental data collected during six different oceanographic cruises and can possibly be used for a detailed exploration of the effects of climate change on mercury distribution.
Elisa Lovecchio and Timothy M. Lenton
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 1865–1883, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1865-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1865-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We present here the newly developed BPOP box model. BPOP is aimed at studying the impact of large-scale changes in the biological pump, i.e. the cycle of production, export and remineralization of the marine organic matter, on the nutrient and oxygen concentrations in the shelf and open ocean. This model has been developed to investigate the global consequences of the evolution of larger and heavier phytoplankton cells but can be applied to a variety of past and future case studies.
Benjamin D. Stocker, Han Wang, Nicholas G. Smith, Sandy P. Harrison, Trevor F. Keenan, David Sandoval, Tyler Davis, and I. Colin Prentice
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 1545–1581, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1545-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1545-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Estimating terrestrial photosynthesis relies on satellite data of vegetation cover and models simulating the efficiency by which light absorbed by vegetation is used for CO2 assimilation. This paper presents the P-model, a light use efficiency model derived from a carbon–water optimality principle, and evaluates its predictions of ecosystem-level photosynthesis against globally distributed observations. The model is implemented and openly accessible as an R package (rpmodel).
Louis de Wergifosse, Frédéric André, Nicolas Beudez, François de Coligny, Hugues Goosse, François Jonard, Quentin Ponette, Hugues Titeux, Caroline Vincke, and Mathieu Jonard
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 1459–1498, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1459-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1459-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Given their key role in the simulation of climate impacts on tree growth, phenological and water balance processes must be integrated in models simulating forest dynamics under a changing environment. Here, we describe these processes integrated in HETEROFOR, a model accounting simultaneously for the functional, structural and spatial complexity to explore the forest response to forestry practices. The model evaluation using phenological and soil water content observations is quite promising.
Arjun Chakrawal, Anke M. Herrmann, John Koestel, Jerker Jarsjö, Naoise Nunan, Thomas Kätterer, and Stefano Manzoni
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 1399–1429, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1399-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1399-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Soils are heterogeneous, which results in a nonuniform spatial distribution of substrates and the microorganisms feeding on them. Our results show that the variability in the spatial distribution of substrates and microorganisms at the pore scale is crucial because it affects how fast substrates are used by microorganisms and thus the decomposition rate observed at the soil core scale. This work provides a methodology to include microscale heterogeneity in soil carbon cycling models.
Victoria Naipal, Ronny Lauerwald, Philippe Ciais, Bertrand Guenet, and Yilong Wang
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 1201–1222, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1201-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1201-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
In this study we present the Carbon Erosion DYNAMics model (CE-DYNAM) that links sediment dynamics resulting from water erosion with the soil carbon cycle along a cascade of hillslopes, floodplains, and rivers. The model can simulate the removal of soil and carbon from eroding areas and their destination at regional scale. We calibrated and validated the model for the Rhine catchment, and we show that soil erosion is a potential large net carbon sink over the period 1850–2005.
Yuma Sakai, Hideki Kobayashi, and Tomomichi Kato
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2020-19, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2020-19, 2020
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
Short summary
Chlorophyll fluorescence is one of the energy release pathways of excess incident lights in the photosynthetic process. The canopy scale sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF), which potentially provides a direct pathway to link leaf-level photosynthesis to global GPP, can be observed from satellites. We develop the three-dimensional Monte Carlo plant canopy radiative transfer model to understand the biological and physical mechanisms behind the SIF emission from complex forest canopies.
Kelly Kearney, Albert Hermann, Wei Cheng, Ivonne Ortiz, and Kerim Aydin
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 597–650, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-597-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-597-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We describe an ecosystem model for the Bering Sea. Biological components in the Bering Sea can be found in the water column, on and within the bottom sediments, and within the porous lower layer of seasonal sea ice. This model simulates the exchange of material between nutrients and plankton within all three environments. Here, we thoroughly document the model and assess its skill in capturing key biophysical features across the Bering Sea.
Femke Lutz, Stephen DelGrosso, Stephen Ogle, Stephen Williams, Sara Minoli, Susanne Rolinski, Jens Heinke, Jetse J. Stoorvogel, and Christoph Müller
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2019-364, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2019-364, 2020
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Matthias J. R. Speich, Massimiliano Zappa, Marc Scherstjanoi, and Heike Lischke
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 537–564, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-537-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-537-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Climate change is expected to substantially affect natural processes, and simulation models are a valuable tool to anticipate these changes. In this study, we combine two existing models that each describe one aspect of the environment: forest dynamics and the terrestrial water cycle. The coupled model better described observed patterns in vegetation structure. We also found that including the effect of water availability on tree height and rooting depth improved the model.
Simon P. K. Bowring, Ronny Lauerwald, Bertrand Guenet, Dan Zhu, Matthieu Guimberteau, Pierre Regnier, Ardalan Tootchi, Agnès Ducharne, and Philippe Ciais
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 507–520, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-507-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-507-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
In this second part of the study, we performed simulations of the carbon and water budget of the Lena catchment with the land surface model ORCHIDEE MICT-LEAK, enabled to simulate dissolved organic carbon (DOC) production in soils and its transport and fate in high-latitude inland waters. We compare simulations using this model to existing data sources to show that it is capable of reproducing dissolved carbon fluxes of potentially great importance for the future of the global permafrost.
Tingting Li, Yanyu Lu, Lingfei Yu, Wenjuan Sun, Qing Zhang, Wen Zhang, Guocheng Wang, Lijun Yu, and Ran Zhang
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2019-367, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2019-367, 2020
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
Short summary
Reliable models are required to estimate global wetland CH4 emissions. In this study, we tested two process-based models, CH4MODwetlandand TEM, against the CH4 flux measurements of different continents and wetland types across the world and estimated the global CH4 emissions from 2000 to 2010 from natural wetlands. Each model shows good performance in different continents or wetland types. The estimated global CH4 emissions by the models would be 116.99–124.74 Tg yr−1 for the period 2000–2010.
Emily Kyker-Snowman, William R. Wieder, Serita Frey, and A. Stuart Grandy
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2019-320, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2019-320, 2019
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
Short summary
Microbes drive carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) transformations in soil, and soil models have started to include explicit microbial physiology and functioning to try to reduce uncertainty in soil-climate feedbacks. Here, we add N cycling to a microbially-explicit soil C model and reproduce C and N dynamics in soil during litter decomposition across a range of sites. We discuss model-generated hypotheses about soil C and N cycling and highlight the need for landscape-scale model evaluation data.
Carme Font, Francesco Bregoli, Vicenç Acuña, Sergi Sabater, and Rafael Marcé
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 5213–5228, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-5213-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-5213-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
GLOBAL-FATE is an open-source, multiplatform, and flexible model that simulates the fate of pharmaceutical-like compounds in the global river network. The model considers the consumption of pharmaceuticals by humans, differentiates between pharmaceutical load treated in wastewater treatment plants from that directly delivered to streams and rivers, and integrates lakes and reservoirs in calculations. GLOBAL-FATE is a powerful tool for pollutant impact studies at the global scale.
Luke Gregor, Alice D. Lebehot, Schalk Kok, and Pedro M. Scheel Monteiro
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 5113–5136, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-5113-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-5113-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
The ocean plays a vital role in mitigating climate change by taking up atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2). Historically sparse ship-based measurements of surface ocean CO2 make direct estimates of CO2 exchange changes unreliable. We introduce a machine-learning ensemble approach to fill these observational gaps. Our method performs incrementally better relative to past methods, leading to our hypothesis that we are perhaps reaching the limitation of machine-learning algorithms' capability.
Markus Drüke, Matthias Forkel, Werner von Bloh, Boris Sakschewski, Manoel Cardoso, Mercedes Bustamante, Jürgen Kurths, and Kirsten Thonicke
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 5029–5054, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-5029-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-5029-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
This work shows the successful application of a systematic model–data integration setup, as well as the implementation of a new fire danger formulation, in order to optimize a process-based fire-enabled dynamic global vegetation model. We have demonstrated a major improvement in the fire representation within LPJmL4-SPITFIRE in terms of the spatial pattern and the interannual variability of burned area in South America as well as in the modelling of biomass and the distribution of plant types.
Nicolas Vuichard, Palmira Messina, Sebastiaan Luyssaert, Bertrand Guenet, Sönke Zaehle, Josefine Ghattas, Vladislav Bastrikov, and Philippe Peylin
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 4751–4779, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4751-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4751-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
In this research, we present a new version of the global terrestrial ecosystem model ORCHIDEE in which carbon and nitrogen cycles are coupled. We evaluate its skills at simulating primary production at 78 sites and at a global scale. Based on a set of additional simulations in which carbon and nitrogen cycles are coupled and uncoupled, we show that the functional responses of the model with carbon–nitrogen interactions better agree with our current understanding of photosynthesis.
Dave van Wees and Guido R. van der Werf
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 4681–4703, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4681-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4681-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
For this paper, a novel high spatial-resolution fire emission model based on the Global Fire Emissions Database (GFED) modelling framework was developed and compared to a coarser-resolution version of the same model. Our findings highlight the importance of fine spatial resolution when modelling global-scale fire emissions, especially considering the comparison of model pixels to individual field measurements and the model representation of heterogeneity in the landscape.
Yoshiki Kanzaki, Bernard P. Boudreau, Sandra Kirtland Turner, and Andy Ridgwell
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 4469–4496, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4469-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4469-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
This paper provides eLABS, an extension of the lattice-automaton bioturbation simulator LABS. In our new model, the benthic animal behavior interacts and changes dynamically with oxygen and organic matter concentrations and the water flows caused by benthic animals themselves, in a 2-D marine-sediment grid. The model can address the mechanisms behind empirical observations of bioturbation based on the interactions between physical, chemical and biological aspects of marine sediment.
Marcos Longo, Ryan G. Knox, David M. Medvigy, Naomi M. Levine, Michael C. Dietze, Yeonjoo Kim, Abigail L. S. Swann, Ke Zhang, Christine R. Rollinson, Rafael L. Bras, Steven C. Wofsy, and Paul R. Moorcroft
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 4309–4346, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4309-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4309-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Our paper describes the Ecosystem Demography model. This computer program calculates how plants and ground exchange heat, water, and carbon with the air, and how plants grow, reproduce and die in different climates. Most models simplify forests to an average big tree. We consider that tall, deep-rooted trees get more light and water than small plants, and that some plants can with shade and drought. This diversity helps us to better explain how plants live and interact with the atmosphere.
Marcos Longo, Ryan G. Knox, Naomi M. Levine, Abigail L. S. Swann, David M. Medvigy, Michael C. Dietze, Yeonjoo Kim, Ke Zhang, Damien Bonal, Benoit Burban, Plínio B. Camargo, Matthew N. Hayek, Scott R. Saleska, Rodrigo da Silva, Rafael L. Bras, Steven C. Wofsy, and Paul R. Moorcroft
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 4347–4374, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4347-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4347-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
The Ecosystem Demography model calculates the fluxes of heat, water, and carbon between plants and ground and the air, and the life cycle of plants in different climates. To test if our calculations were reasonable, we compared our results with field and satellite measurements. Our model predicts well the extent of the Amazon forest, how much light forests absorb, and how much water forests release to the air. However, it must improve the tree growth rates and how fast dead plants decompose.
Elias C. Massoud, Chonggang Xu, Rosie A. Fisher, Ryan G. Knox, Anthony P. Walker, Shawn P. Serbin, Bradley O. Christoffersen, Jennifer A. Holm, Lara M. Kueppers, Daniel M. Ricciuto, Liang Wei, Daniel J. Johnson, Jeffrey Q. Chambers, Charlie D. Koven, Nate G. McDowell, and Jasper A. Vrugt
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 4133–4164, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4133-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4133-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
We conducted a comprehensive sensitivity analysis to understand behaviors of a demographic vegetation model within a land surface model. By running the model 5000 times with changing input parameter values, we found that (1) the photosynthetic capacity controls carbon fluxes, (2) the allometry is important for tree growth, and (3) the targeted carbon storage is important for tree survival. These results can provide guidance on improved model parameterization for a better fit to observations.
Jarmo Mäkelä, Jürgen Knauer, Mika Aurela, Andrew Black, Martin Heimann, Hideki Kobayashi, Annalea Lohila, Ivan Mammarella, Hank Margolis, Tiina Markkanen, Jouni Susiluoto, Tea Thum, Toni Viskari, Sönke Zaehle, and Tuula Aalto
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 4075–4098, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4075-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4075-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
We assess the differences of six stomatal conductance formulations, embedded into a land–vegetation model JSBACH, on 10 boreal coniferous evergreen forest sites. We calibrate the model parameters using all six functions in a multi-year experiment, as well as for a separate drought event at one of the sites, using the adaptive population importance sampler. The analysis reveals weaknesses in the stomatal conductance formulation-dependent model behaviour that we are able to partially amend.
Titta Majasalmi and Ryan M. Bright
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 3923–3938, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3923-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3923-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Many land surface models rely on solutions derived from two-stream approximations utilizing leaf-level optical properties, many of which have not been formally reviewed or published. Using plant functional type groupings of the Community Land Model (CLM), we found large deviations between measured and CLM default near-infrared optical properties, implying that the modeled shortwave radiation budget including surface albedo may be expected to change after updating the biased parameters.
Julius Vira, Peter Hess, Jeff Melkonian, and William R. Wieder
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2019-233, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2019-233, 2019
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
Short summary
Atmospheric emission of ammonia from fertilizers and livestock manure constitutes a significant pathway of nutrient transport from agricultural to natural ecosystems. This study evaluates a model for simulating ammonia emissions and their response to climate change. The model is first compared with empirical data, and then applied globally. The simulated emissions are similar to earlier estimates for Europe, North America and China, but differ for Africa, India and South America.
Simon P. K. Bowring, Ronny Lauerwald, Bertrand Guenet, Dan Zhu, Matthieu Guimberteau, Ardalan Tootchi, Agnès Ducharne, and Philippe Ciais
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 3503–3521, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3503-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3503-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Few Earth system models represent permafrost soil biogeochemistry, contributing to uncertainty in estimating its response and that of the planet to warming. Because the permafrost contains over double the carbon in the present atmosphere, its fate as it is
unlockedby warming is globally significant. One way it can be mobilised is into rivers, the sea, or the atmosphere: a vector previously ignored in climate modelling. We present a model scheme for resolving this vector at a global scale.
Jinxuan Chen, Christoph Gerbig, Julia Marshall, and Kai Uwe Totsche
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2019-173, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2019-173, 2019
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
Short summary
One of the essential challenge for atmospheric CO2 forecasting is predicting CO2 flux variation on sub-daily time scale. For CAMS CO2 forecast, a process-based vegetation model is used.
In this research we evaluate another type of model (i.e. the light-use-efficiency model VPRM), which is a data-driven approach and thus ideal for realistic estimation, on its flux prediction ability. Errors from different sources are assessed, and overall the model is capable of CO2 flux prediction.
Chunjing Qiu, Dan Zhu, Philippe Ciais, Bertrand Guenet, Shushi Peng, Gerhard Krinner, Ardalan Tootchi, Agnès Ducharne, and Adam Hastie
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 2961–2982, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2961-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2961-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
We present a model that can simulate the dynamics of peatland area extent and the vertical buildup of peat. The model is validated across a range of northern peatland sites and over the Northern Hemisphere (> 30° N). It is able to reproduce the spatial extent of northern peatlands and peat carbon accumulation over the Holocene.
Femke Lutz, Tobias Herzfeld, Jens Heinke, Susanne Rolinski, Sibyll Schaphoff, Werner von Bloh, Jetse J. Stoorvogel, and Christoph Müller
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 2419–2440, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2419-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2419-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Tillage practices are under-represented in global biogeochemical models so that assessments of agricultural greenhouse gas emissions and climate mitigation options are hampered. We describe the implementation of tillage modules into the model LPJmL5.0, including multiple feedbacks between soil water, nitrogen, and productivity. By comparing simulation results with observational data, we show that the model can reproduce reported tillage effects on carbon and water dynamics and crop yields.
Thomas Luke Smallman and Mathew Williams
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 2227–2253, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2227-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2227-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Photosynthesis and evapotranspiration are processes with global significance for climate, carbon and water cycling. Process-orientated simulation of these processes and their interactions have till now come at high computational cost. Here we present a new coupled model of intermediate complexity operating at orders of magnitude greater speed. Independent evaluation at FLUXNET sites for a single, global parameterization shows good agreement, with a typical R2 value of ~ 0.60.
Mingkai Jiang, Sönke Zaehle, Martin G. De Kauwe, Anthony P. Walker, Silvia Caldararu, David S. Ellsworth, and Belinda E. Medlyn
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 2069–2089, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2069-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2069-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Here we used a simple analytical framework developed by Comins and McMurtrie (1993) to investigate how different model assumptions affected plant responses to elevated CO2. This framework is useful in revealing both the consequences and the mechanisms through which different assumptions affect predictions. We therefore recommend the use of this framework to analyze the likely outcomes of new assumptions before introducing them to complex model structures.
Ahmed S. Elshall, Ming Ye, Guo-Yue Niu, and Greg A. Barron-Gafford
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 2009–2032, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2009-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2009-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
The assumptions that the residuals are independent, identically distributed, and have constant variance tend to simplify the underlying mathematics of data models for Bayesian inference. We relax these three assumptions step-wise, resulting in eight data models. Using three mechanistic soil respiration models with different levels of model discrepancy, we discuss the impacts of data models on parameter estimation and predictive performance, and provide recommendations for data model selection.
Malte Heinemann, Joachim Segschneider, and Birgit Schneider
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 1869–1883, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1869-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1869-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Ocean CO2 uptake played a crucial role for the global cooling during ice ages. Dust formation, e.g. by ice scraping over bedrock, potentially contributed to this CO2 uptake because (1) the iron in the dust is a fertilizer and (2) the heavy dust particles can accelerate sinking organic matter (ballasting hypothesis). This study tests the glacial dust ballasting hypothesis for the first time, using an ocean model. It turns out, however, that the ballasting effect probably played a minor role.
Ute Daewel, Corinna Schrum, and Jed I. Macdonald
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 1765–1789, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1765-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1765-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Here we propose a novel modelling approach that includes an extended food web in a functional-group-type marine ecosystem model (ECOSMO E2E) by formulating new groups for macrobenthos and fish. This enables the estimation of the dynamics of the higher-trophic-level production potential and constitutes a more consistent closure term for the lower-trophic-level ecosystem. Thus, the model allows for the study of the control mechanisms for marine ecosystems at a high spatial and temporal resolution.
Junyi Liang, Gangsheng Wang, Daniel M. Ricciuto, Lianhong Gu, Paul J. Hanson, Jeffrey D. Wood, and Melanie A. Mayes
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 1601–1612, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1601-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1601-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Soil respiration, the second largest carbon fluxes between the atmosphere and land, is not well represented in global land models. In this study, using long-term observations at a temperate forest, we identified a solution for using better soil water potential simulations to improve predictions of soil respiration in the E3SM land model. In addition, parameter calibration further improved model performance.
Cameron M. O'Neill, Andrew McC. Hogg, Michael J. Ellwood, Stephen M. Eggins, and Bradley N. Opdyke
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 1541–1572, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1541-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1541-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
The [simple carbon project] model v1.0 (SCP-M) was constructed for simulations of the paleo and modern carbon cycle. In this paper we show its application to the carbon cycle transition from the Last Glacial Maximum to the Holocene period. Our model–data experiment uses SCP-M's fast run time to cover a large range of possible inputs. The results highlight the role of varying the strength of ocean circulation to account for large fluctuations in atmospheric CO2 across the two periods.
Jan Philipp Dietrich, Benjamin Leon Bodirsky, Florian Humpenöder, Isabelle Weindl, Miodrag Stevanović, Kristine Karstens, Ulrich Kreidenweis, Xiaoxi Wang, Abhijeet Mishra, David Klein, Geanderson Ambrósio, Ewerton Araujo, Amsalu Woldie Yalew, Lavinia Baumstark, Stephen Wirth, Anastasis Giannousakis, Felicitas Beier, David Meng-Chuen Chen, Hermann Lotze-Campen, and Alexander Popp
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 1299–1317, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1299-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1299-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
We provides an overview on version 4 of the MAgPIE open-source framework for modeling global land systems. Among others, MAgPIE has been used to simulate marker scenarios of the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs) and contributed substantially to multiple IPCC assessments. Its recent version marks the first open-source release of the framework and introduces several new features. Via its modularity and spatial flexibility it can serve as a tool for a broad range of land-related research topics.
Yuanyuan Huang, Mark Stacy, Jiang Jiang, Nilutpal Sundi, Shuang Ma, Volodymyr Saruta, Chang Gyo Jung, Zheng Shi, Jianyang Xia, Paul J. Hanson, Daniel Ricciuto, and Yiqi Luo
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 1119–1137, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1119-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1119-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Predicting future changes in ecosystem services is not only highly desirable but is also becoming feasible as several forces are converging to transform ecological research into quantitative forecasting. To realize ecological forecasting, we have developed an Ecological Platform for Assimilating Data (EcoPAD) into models. EcoPAD also has the potential to become an interactive tool for resource management, stimulate citizen science in ecology, and transform environmental education.
Veiko Lehsten, Michael Mischurow, Erik Lindström, Dörte Lehsten, and Heike Lischke
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 893–908, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-893-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-893-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
To assess the effect of climate on vegetation, dynamic vegetation models simulate their response e.g. to climate change. Most currently used dynamic vegetation models ignore the fact that for colonization of a new area not only do the climatic conditions have to be suitable, but seeds also need to arrive at the site to allow the species to migrate there. In this paper we are developing a novel method which allows us to simulate migration within dynamic vegetation models even at large scale.
Hyun-Chae Jung, Byung-Kwon Moon, Jieun Wie, Hyei-Sun Park, Johan Lee, and Young-Hwa Byun
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 699–722, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-699-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-699-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
We developed the GOTM–TOPAZ, a single-column ocean biogeochemistry model, which simulates the biogeochemical processes including carbon and nutrient cycles. The model contains the bio–physical feedback by incorporating the oceanic heating due to chlorophyll absorption of solar radiation. We evaluate the model performance against available observations and a global ocean simulation, and this shows that our model reproduces the magnitude of and variability in biogeochemical variables well.
Hocheol Seo and Yeonjoo Kim
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 457–472, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-457-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-457-2019, 2019
Chantelle Burton, Richard Betts, Manoel Cardoso, Ted R. Feldpausch, Anna Harper, Chris D. Jones, Douglas I. Kelley, Eddy Robertson, and Andy Wiltshire
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 179–193, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-179-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-179-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Fire and land-use change are important disturbances within the Earth system, and their inclusion in models is critical to enable the correct simulation of vegetation cover. Here we describe developments to the land surface model JULES to represent explicit land-use change and fire and to assess the effects of each process on present day vegetation compared to observations. Using historical land-use data and the fire model INFERNO, overall model results are improved by the developments.
Sergey Venevsky, Yannick Le Page, José M. C. Pereira, and Chao Wu
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 89–110, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-89-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-89-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
We present SEVER-FIRE (v1.0), incorporated into the SEVER DGVM. One of the major focuses of SEVER-FIRE is an implementation of the pyrogenic behavior of humans (timing of their activities and their willingness and necessity to ignite or suppress fire), related to socioeconomic and demographic conditions in a geographical domain of the model application. Unlike other DGVM- and ESM-based global fire models, we do not use any satellite-derived assumptions in equations of fire model development.
Anja Rammig, Jens Heinke, Florian Hofhansl, Hans Verbeeck, Timothy R. Baker, Bradley Christoffersen, Philippe Ciais, Hannes De Deurwaerder, Katrin Fleischer, David Galbraith, Matthieu Guimberteau, Andreas Huth, Michelle Johnson, Bart Krujit, Fanny Langerwisch, Patrick Meir, Phillip Papastefanou, Gilvan Sampaio, Kirsten Thonicke, Celso von Randow, Christian Zang, and Edna Rödig
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 5203–5215, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-5203-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-5203-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
We propose a generic approach for a pixel-to-point comparison applicable for evaluation of models and remote-sensing products. We provide statistical measures accounting for the uncertainty in ecosystem variables. We demonstrate our approach by comparing simulated values of aboveground biomass, woody productivity and residence time of woody biomass from four dynamic global vegetation models (DGVMs) with measured inventory data from permanent plots in the Amazon rainforest.
Vladislav Bastrikov, Natasha MacBean, Cédric Bacour, Diego Santaren, Sylvain Kuppel, and Philippe Peylin
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 4739–4754, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4739-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4739-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, we compare different methods for optimising parameters of the ORCHIDEE land surface model (LSM) using in situ observations. We use two minimisation methods - local gradient-based and global random search - applied either at each individual site or a group of sites characterised by one plant functional type. We demonstrate the advantages and challenges of different techniques and provide some advice on using it for the LSM parameters optimisation.
Haicheng Zhang, Daniel S. Goll, Stefano Manzoni, Philippe Ciais, Bertrand Guenet, and Yuanyuan Huang
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 4779–4796, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4779-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4779-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
Carbon use efficiency (CUE) of decomposers depends strongly on the organic matter quality (C : N ratio) and soil nutrient availability rather than a fixed value. A soil biogeochemical model with flexible CUE can better capture the differences in respiration rate of litter with contrasting C : N ratios and under different levels of mineral N availability than the model with fixed CUE, and well represent the effect of varying litter quality (N content) on SOM formation across temporal scales.
Cited articles
Ahrens, B., Braakhekke, M. C., Guggenberger, G., Schrumpf, M., and Reichstein,
M.: Contribution of sorption, DOC transport and microbial interactions to the
14C age of a soil organic carbon profile: Insights from a calibrated process
model, Soil Biol. Biochem., 88, 390–402, 2015. a
Ammann, C., Flechard, C., Leifeld, J., Neftel, A., and Fuhrer, J.: The carbon
budget of newly established temperate grassland depends on management
intensity, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ., 121, 5–20,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2006.12.002,
2007. a
Araújo, A. C., Nobre, A. D., Kruijt, B., Elbers, J. A., Dallarosa, R.,
Stefani, P., von Randow, C., Manzi, A. O., Culf, A. D., Gash, J. H. C.,
Valentini, R., and Kabat, P.: Comparative measurements of carbon dioxide
fluxes from two nearby towers in a central Amazonian rainforest: The Manaus
LBA site, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 107, LBA 58–1–LBA
58–20, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000676,
2002. a
Archibald, S., Nickless, A., Govender, N., Scholes, R. J., and Lehsten, V.:
Climate and the inter-annual variability of fire in southern Africa: a
meta-analysis using long-term field data and satellite-derived burnt area
data, Global Ecol. Biogeogr., 19, 794–809,
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00568.x,
2010. a
Atkin, O. K., Meir, P., and Turnbull, M. H.: Improving representation of leaf
respiration in large-scale predictive climate–vegetation models, New
Phytol., 202, 743–748, https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12686,
2014. a, b
Ball, J., Wooddrow, I., and Berry, J. A.: A model predicting stomatal
conductance and its contribution to the control of photosynthesis under
different environmental conditions, in: Progress in Photosynthesis Research,
edited by: Biggens, J., Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1–4, 1987. a
Berbigier, P., Bonnefond, J.-M., and Mellmann, P.: CO2 and water vapour fluxes
for 2 years above Euroflux forest site, Agr. Forest Meteorol.,
108, 183–197, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1923(01)00240-4,
2001. a
Bergeron, O., Margolis, H. A., Black, T. A., Coursolle, C., Dunn, A. L., Barr,
A. G., and Wofsy, S. C.: Comparison of carbon dioxide fluxes over three
boreal black spruce forests in Canada, Glob. Change Biol., 13, 89–107,
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01281.x,
2007. a
Beringer, J., Hutley, L. B., Hacker, J. M., Neininger, B., and Paw, U. K. T.:
Patterns and processes of carbon, water and energy cycles across northern
Australian landscapes: From point to region, Agr. Forest
Meteorol., 151, 1409–1416,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2011.05.003,
2011. a
Bernacchi, C. J., Singsaas, E. L., Pimentel, C., Protis Jr., A. R., and Long,
S. P.: Improved temperature response functions for models of Rubisco-limited
photosynthesis, Plant Cell Environ., 24, 253–259, 2001. a
Beven, K.: On doing better hydrological science, Hydrol. Process., 22,
3549–3553, 2008. a
Bonan, G. B.: Forests and Climate Change: Forcings, Feedbacks, and the Climate
Benefits of Forests, Science, 320, 1444–1449,
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1155121,
2008. a
Bonan, G. B. and Doney, S. C.: Climate, ecosystems, and planetary futures: The
challenge to predict life in Earth system models, Science, 359, eaam8328,
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam8328,
2018. a
Bradford, M. A., Wieder, W. R., Bonan, G. B., Fierer, N., Raymond, P. A., and
Crowther, T. W.: Managing uncertainty in soil carbon feedbacks to climate
change, Nat. Clim. Change, 6, 751–758, https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3071,
2016. a
Brahney, J., Mahowald, N., Ward, D. S., Ballantyne, A. P., and Neff, J. C.: Is
atmospheric phosphorus pollution altering global alpine Lake stoichiometry?,
Global Biogeochem. Cy., 29, 1369–1383, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GB005137,
2015. a
Campioli, M., Vicca, S., Luyssaert, S., and Bilcke, J.: Biomass production
efficiency controlled by management in temperate and boreal ecosystems,
Nat. Geosci., 8, 843–846, 2015. a
Carrara, A., Janssens, I. A., Yuste, J. C., and Ceulemans, R.: Seasonal changes
in photosynthesis, respiration and NEE of a mixed temperate forest,
Agr. Forest Meteorol., 126, 15–31,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2004.05.002,
2004. a
Chien, C.-T., Mackey, K. R. M., Dutkiewicz, S., Mahowald, N. M., Prospero,
J. M., and Paytan, A.: Effects of African dust deposition on phytoplankton in
the western tropical Atlantic Ocean off Barbados, Global Biogeochem.
Cy., 30, 716–734, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GB005334,
2016. a
Chiesi, M., Maselli, F., Bindi, M., Fibbi, L., Cherubini, P., Arlotta, E.,
Tirone, G., Matteucci, G., and Seufert, G.: Modelling carbon budget of
Mediterranean forests using ground and remote sensing measurements,
Agr. Forest Meteorol., 135, 22–34,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2005.09.011,
2005. a
Best, M. J., Pryor, M., Clark, D. B., Rooney, G. G., Essery, R. L. H., Ménard, C. B., Edwards, J. M., Hendry, M. A., Porson, A., Gedney, N., Mercado, L. M., Sitch, S., Blyth, E., Boucher, O., Cox, P. M., Grimmond, C. S. B., and Harding, R. J.: The Joint UK Land Environment Simulator (JULES), model description – Part 1: Energy and water fluxes, Geosci. Model Dev., 4, 677–699, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-677-2011, 2011. a
Cleugh, H. A., Leuning, R., Mu, Q., and Running, S. W.: Regional evaporation
estimates from flux tower and MODIS satellite data, Remote Sens.
Environ., 106, 285–304,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2006.07.007,
2007. a
Cleveland, C. C., Townsend, A. R., Schimel, D. S., Fisher, H., Howarth, R. W.,
Hedin, L. O., Perakis, S. S., Latty, E. F., Von Fischer, J. C., Elseroad, A.,
and Wasson, M. F.: Global patterns of terrestrial biological nitrogen (N-2)
fixation in natural ecosystems, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 13, 623–645,
1999. a
Cleveland, C. C., Houlton, B. Z., Smith, W. K., Marklein, A. R., Reed, S. C.,
Parton, W. J., Del Grosso, S. J., and Running, S.: Patterns of new versus
recycled primary production in the terrestrial biosphere, P.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110, 12733–12737, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1302768110, 2013. a
Cook, B. D., Davis, K. J., Wang, W., Desai, A., Berger, B. W., Teclaw, R. M.,
Martin, J. G., Bolstad, P. V., Bakwin, P. S., Yi, C., and Heilman, W.: Carbon
exchange and venting anomalies in an upland deciduous forest in northern
Wisconsin, USA, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 126, 271–295,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2004.06.008,
2004. a
Cornwell, W., Wright, I., Turner, J., Maire, V., Barbour, M., Cernusak, L.,
Dawson, T., Ellsworth, D., Farquhar, G., Griffiths, H., Keitel, C., Knohl,
A., Reich, P., Williams, D., Bhaskar, R., Cornelissen, J., Richards, A.,
Schmidt, S., Valladares, F., C, K., Schulze, E.-D., Buchmann, N., and
Santiago, L.: Leaf Δ13C database, available at:
https://github.com/wcornwell/leaf13C/tree/v0.1.0 (last access: 31 July 2018),
2018a. a
Cornwell, W. K., Wright, I. J., Turner, J., Maire, V., Barbour, M. M.,
Cernusak, L. A., Dawson, T., Ellsworth, D., Farquhar, G. D., Griffiths, H.,
Keitel, C., Knohl, A., Reich, P. B., Williams, D. G., Bhaskar, R.,
Cornelissen, J. H. C., Richards, A., Schmidt, S., Valladares, F., Körner,
C., Schulze, E.-D., Buchmann, N., and Santiago, L. S.: Climate and soils
together regulate photosynthetic carbon isotope discrimination within C3
plants worldwide, Global Ecol. Biogeogr., 27, 1056–1067,
2018b. a, b, c, d
De Kauwe, M. G., Medlyn, B. E., Zaehle, S., Walker, A. P., Dietze, M. C.,
Hickler, T., Jain, A. K., Luo, Y., Parton, W. J., Prentice, I. C., Smith, B.,
Thornton, P. E., Wang, S., Wang, Y.-P., Wårlind, D., Weng, E., Crous,
Kristine, Y., Ellsworth, D. S., Hanson, P. J., Seok, K. H., Warren, J. M.,
Oren, R., and Norby, R. J.: Forest water use and water use efficiency at
elevated CO2: a model-data intercomparison at two contrasting temperate
forest FACE sites, Glob. Change Biol., 19, 1759–1779,
https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12164,
2013. a, b
De Kauwe, M. G., Medlyn, B. E., Zaehle, S., Walker, A. P., Dietze, M. C., Wang,
Y.-P., Luo, Y., Jain, A. K., El-Masri, B., Hickler, T., Wårlind, D., Weng,
E., Parton, W. J., Thornton, P. E., Wang, S., Prentice, I. C., Asao, S.,
Smith, B., McCarthy, H. R., Iversen, C. M., Hanson, P. J., Warren, J. M.,
Oren, R., and Norby, R. J.: Where does the carbon go? A model–data
intercomparison of vegetation carbon allocation and turnover processes at two
temperate forest free-air CO2 enrichment sites, New Phytol., 203,
883–899, https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12847,
2014. a
Desai, A. R., Bolstad, P. V., Cook, B. D., Davis, K. J., and Carey, E. V.:
Comparing net ecosystem exchange of carbon dioxide between an old-growth and
mature forest in the upper Midwest, USA, Agr. Forest Meteorol.,
128, 33–55, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2004.09.005,
2005. a
Dickinson, R. E., Oleson, K. W., Bonan, G., Hoffman, F., Thornton, P.,
Vertenstein, M., Yang, Z.-L., and Zeng, X.: The Community Land Model and Its
Climate Statistics as a Component of the Community Climate System Model,
J. Climate, 19, 2302–2324, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3742.1,
2006. a
Dolman, A., Moors, E., and Elbers, J.: The carbon uptake of a mid latitude pine
forest growing on sandy soil, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 111, 157–170, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1923(02)00024-2,
2002. a
Dunn, A. L., Barford, C. C., Wofsy, S. C., Goulden, M. L., and Daube, B. C.: A
long-term record of carbon exchange in a boreal black spruce forest: means,
responses to interannual variability, and decadal trends, Glob. Change
Biol., 13, 577–590, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01221.x,
2007. a
Egea, G., Verhoef, A., and Vidale, P. L.: Towards an improved and more
flexible representation of water stress in coupled
photosynthesis–stomatal conductance
models, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 151, 1370–1384, 2011. a
Fisher, R., McDowell, N., Purves, D., Moorcroft, P., Sitch, S. A., Cox, P. M.,
Huntingford, C., Meir, P., and Ian Woodward, F.: Assessing uncertainties in
a second-generation dynamic vegetation model caused by ecological scale
limitations, New Phytol., 187, 666–681, 2010. a
Friedlingstein, P., Meinshausen, M., Arora, V. K., Jones, C. D., Anav, A.,
Liddicoat, S. K., and Knutti, R.: Uncertainties in CMIP5 Climate Projections
due to Carbon Cycle Feedbacks, J. Climate, 27, 511–526,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00579.1,
2014. a
Friend, A. D.: Terrestrial plant production and climate change, J.
Exp. Bot., 61, 1293–1309, 2010. a
Friend, A. D., Stevens, A. K., Knox, R. G., and Cannell, M. G. R.: A
process-based, terrestrial biosphere model of ecosystem dynamics (Hybrid
v3.0), Ecol. Model., 95, 249–287, 1997. a
Friend, A. D., Geider, R. J., Behrenfeld, M. J., and Still, C. J.:
Photosynthesis in Global-Scale Models, in: Photosynthesis in silico:
Understanding complexity from molecules to ecosystems, edited by: Laisk, A.,
Nedbal, L., and Govindjee, Springer, 465–497, 2009. a
Gerber, S., Hedin, L. O., Oppenheimer, M., Pacala, S. W., and Shevliakova, E.:
Nitrogen cycling and feedbacks in a global dynamic land model, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 24, GB1001 https://doi.org/10.1029-2008GB003336, 2010. a
Goldstein, A., Hultman, N., Fracheboud, J., Bauer, M., Panek, J., Xu, M., Qi,
Y., Guenther, A., and Baugh, W.: Effects of climate variability on the carbon
dioxide, water, and sensible heat fluxes above a ponderosa pine plantation in
the Sierra Nevada (CA), Agr. Forest Meteorol., 101, 113–129,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1923(99)00168-9,
2000. a
Goll, D. S., Vuichard, N., Maignan, F., Jornet-Puig, A., Sardans, J., Violette, A., Peng, S., Sun, Y., Kvakic, M., Guimberteau, M., Guenet, B., Zaehle, S., Penuelas, J., Janssens, I., and Ciais, P.: A representation of the phosphorus cycle for ORCHIDEE (revision 4520), Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 3745–3770, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3745-2017, 2017. a, b, c, d, e
Granier, A., Ceschia, E., Damesin, C., Dufrêne, E., Epron, D., Gross, P.,
Lebaube, S., Le Dantec, V., Le Goff, N., Lemoine, D., Lucot, E., Ottorini,
J. M., Pontailler, J. Y., and Saugier, B.: The carbon balance of a young
Beech forest, Funct. Ecol., 14, 312–325,
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2435.2000.00434.x,
2000. a
Graven, H., Allison, C. E., Etheridge, D. M., Hammer, S., Keeling, R. F., Levin, I., Meijer, H. A. J., Rubino, M., Tans, P. P., Trudinger, C. M., Vaughn, B. H., and White, J. W. C.: Compiled records of carbon isotopes in atmospheric CO2 for historical simulations in CMIP6, Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 4405–4417, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4405-2017, 2017. a
Grünwald, T. and Bernhofer, C.: A decade of carbon, water and energy flux
measurements of an old spruce forest at the Anchor Station Tharandt, Tellus
B, 59, 387–396, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2007.00259.x,
2007. a
Grünzweig, J. M., Lin, T., Rotenberg, E., Schwartz, A., and Yakir, D.: Carbon
sequestration in arid-land forest, Glob. Change Biol., 9, 791–799,
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00612.x,
2003. a
Gu, L., Meyers, T., Pallardy, S. G., Hanson, P. J., Yang, B., Heuer, M.,
Hosman, K. P., Riggs, J. S., Sluss, D., and Wullschleger, S. D.: Direct and
indirect effects of atmospheric conditions and soil moisture on surface
energy partitioning revealed by a prolonged drought at a temperate forest
site, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, D16102,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007161,
2006. a
Hararuk, O., Smith, M. J., and Luo, Y.: Microbial models with data-driven
parameters predict stronger soil carbon responses to climate change, Glob.
Change Biol., 21, 2439–2453, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12827,
2015. a
Hartmann, H., Adams, H. D., Hammond, W. M., Hoch, G., Landhäusser, S. M.,
Wiley, E., and Zaehle, S.: Identifying differences in carbohydrate dynamics
of seedlings and mature trees to improve carbon allocation in models for
trees and forests, Environ. Exp. Bot., 152, 7–18, 2018. a
Hengl, T., Mendes de Jesus, J., Heuvelink, G. B., Ruiperez Gonzalez, M., and
Kilibarda, M.: SoilGrids250m: global gridded soil information based on
Machine Learning, PLoS ONE, 12, e0169748,
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169748, 2017. a
Hollinger, D. Y., Goltz, S. M., Davidson, E. A., Lee, J. T., Tu, K., and
Valentine, H. T.: Seasonal patterns and environmental control of carbon
dioxide and water vapour exchange in an ecotonal boreal forest, Glob. Change
Biol., 5, 891–902, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.1999.00281.x,
1999. a
Hou, E., Chen, C., Luo, Y., Zhou, G., Kuang, Y., Zhang, Y., Heenan, M., Lu, X.,
and Wen, D.: Effects of climate on soil phosphorus cycle and availability in
natural terrestrial ecosystems, Glob. Change Biol., 24, 3344–3356,
https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14093,
2018. a
Hungate, B. A., Dukes, J. S., Shaw, M. R., Luo, Y., and Field, C. B.: Nitrogen
and Climate Change, Science, 302, 1512–1513, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1091390,
2003. a
Hyvönen, R., Agren, G. I., Linder, S., Persson, T., Cotrufo, M. F., Ekblad,
A., Freeman, M., Grelle, A., Janssens, I. A., Jarvis, P. G., Kellomäki,
S., Lindroth, A., Loustau, D., Lundmark, T., Norby, R. J., Oren, R.,
Pilegaard, K., Ryan, M. G., Sigurdsson, B. D., Strömgren, M., van Oijen,
M., and Wallin, G.: The likely impact of elevated [CO2], nitrogen
deposition, increased temperature and management on carbon sequestration in
temperate and boreal forest ecosystems: a literature review, New
Phytol., 173, 463–480, 2007. a, b
Jackson, R. B., Canadell, J., Ehleringer, J. R., Mooney, H. A., Sala, O. E.,
and Schulze, E. D.: A global analysis of root distributions for terrestrial
biomes, Oecologia, 108, 389–411, 1996. a
Jiang, M., Caldararu, S., Zaehle, S., Ellsworth, D. S., and Medlyn, B. E.:
Towards a more physiological representation of vegetation phosphorus
processes in land surface models, New Phytol., 222, 1223–1229,
https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.15688,
2019. a
June, T., Evans, J. R., and Farquhar, G. D.: A simple new equation for the
reversible temperature dependence of photosynthetic electron transport: a
study on soybean leaf, Funct. Plant Biol., 31, 275–283 2004. a
Kattge, J., Díaz, S., Lavorel, S., Prentice, I. C., Leadley, P.,
Bönisch, G., Garnier, E., Westoby, M., Reich, P. B., Wright, I. J.,
Cornelissen, J. H. C., Violle, C., Harrison, S. P., Van Bodegom, P. M.,
Reichstein, M., Enquist, B. J., Soudzilovskaia, N. A., Ackerly, D. D., Anand,
M., Atkin, O., Bahn, M., Baker, T. R., Baldocchi, D., Bekker, R., Blanco,
C. C., Blonder, B., Bond, W. J., Bradstock, R., Bunker, D. E., Casanoves, F.,
Caverner-Bares, J., Chambers, J. Q., Chapin III, F. S., Chave, J., Coomes,
D., Cornwell, W. K., Craine, J. M., Dobrin, B. H., Duarte, L., Durka, W.,
Elser, J., Esser, G., Estiarte, M., Fagan, W. F., Fand, J.,
Fernández-Méndez, F., Fidelis, A., Finegan, B., Flores, O., Ford, H.,
Frank, D., Freschet, G. T., Fyllas, N. M., Gallagher, R. V., Green, W. A.,
Gutierrez, A. G., Thomas, H., Higgins, S. I., Hodgson, J. G., Jalili, A.,
Jansen, S., Joly, C. A., Kerkhoff, A. J., Kirkup, D., Kitajima, K., Kleyer,
M., Klotz, S., Knops, J. M. H., Kramer, K., Kühn, I., Kurokawa, H.,
Laughlin, D., Lee, T. D., Leishman, M., Lens, F., Lenz, T., Lewis, S. L.,
Lloyd, J., Llusià, J., Louault, F., Ma, S., Mahecha, M. D., Manning,
P., Massad, T., Medlyn, B. E., Messier, J., Moles, A. T., Müller, S. C.,
Nadrowski, K., Naeem, S., Niinemets, Ü., Nöllert, S., Nüske, A.,
Ogaya, R., Oleksyn, J., Onipchenko, V. G., Onoda, Y., Ordoñez, J.,
Overbeck, G., Ozinga, W. A., Patino, S., Paula, S., Pausas, J. G.,
Peñuelas, J., Phillips, O. L., Pillar, V., Poorter, H., Poorter, L.,
Poschlod, P., Prinzing, A., Proulx, R., Rammig, A., Reinsch, S., Reu, B.,
Sack, L., Salgado-Negret, B., Sardans, J., Shiodera, S., Shipley, B.,
Siefert, A., Sosinski, E., Soussana, J. F., Swaine, E., Swenson, N.,
Thompson, K., Thornton, P., Waldram, M., Weiher, E., White, M., White, S.,
Wright, S. J., Yguel, B., Zaehle, S., Zanne, A. E., and Wirth, C.: TRY – a
global database of plant traits, Glob. Change Biol., 17, 2905–2935,
2011. a, b
Keenan, T., Sabate, S., and Gracia, C.: Soil water stress and coupled
photosynthesis–conductance models: Bridging the gap between conflicting
reports on the relative roles of stomatal, mesophyll conductance and
biochemical limitations to photosynthesis, Agr. Forest
Meteorol., 150, 443–453,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2010.01.008,
2010. a
Knauer, J., Werner, C., and Zaehle, S.: Evaluating stomatal models and their
atmospheric drought response in a land surface scheme: A multibiome
analysis, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 120, 1894–1911,
2015. a
Knauer, J., Zaehle, S., Reichstein, M., Medlyn, B. E., Forkel, M., Hagemann,
S., and Werner, C.: The response of ecosystem water-use efficiency to rising
atmospheric CO2 concentrations: sensitivity and large-scale biogeochemical
implications, New Phytol., 213, 1654–1666, https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14288,
2016. a
Knauer, J., Zaehle, S., De Kauwe, M., Bahar, N. H., Evans, J. R., Medlyn,
B. E., Reichstein, M., and Werner, C.: Effects of mesophyll conductance on
vegetation responses to elevated CO2 concentrations in a land surface model,
Glob. Change Biol., 25, 1820–1838,https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14604, 2019. a
Korhonen, J. F. J., Pihlatie, M., Pumpanen, J., Aaltonen, H., Hari, P., Levula, J., Kieloaho, A.-J., Nikinmaa, E., Vesala, T., and Ilvesniemi, H.: Nitrogen balance of a boreal Scots pine forest, Biogeosciences, 10, 1083–1095, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-1083-2013, 2013. a, b
Koven, C. D., Riley, W. J., Subin, Z. M., Tang, J. Y., Torn, M. S., Collins, W. D., Bonan, G. B., Lawrence, D. M., and Swenson, S. C.: The effect of vertically resolved soil biogeochemistry and alternate soil C and N models on C dynamics of CLM4, Biogeosciences, 10, 7109–7131, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-7109-2013, 2013. a
Krinner, G., Viovy, N., de Noblet-Ducoudré, N., Ogée, J., Polcher, J.,
Friedlingstein, P., Ciais, P., Sitch, S. A., and Prentice, I. C.: A dynamic
global vegetation model for studies of the coupled atmosphere-biosphere
system, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 19, GB1015, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GB002199, 2005. a
Kutsch, W. L., Kolle, O., Rebmann, C., Knohl, A., Ziegler, W., and Schulze,
E.-D.: Advection and resulting CO2 exchange uncertainty in a tall forest in
central Germany, Ecol. App., 18, 1391–1405,
https://doi.org/10.1890/06-1301.1,
2008. a
Lagergren, F., Lindroth, A., Dellwik, E., Ibrom, A., Lankreijer, H.,
Launiainen, S., Mölder, M., Kolari, P., Pilegaard, K., and Vesala, T.:
Biophysical controls on CO2 fluxes of three Northern forests based on
long-term eddy covariance data, Tellus B, 60, 143–152,
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2006.00324.x,
2008. a, b
Lamarque, J.-F., Bond, T. C., Eyring, V., Granier, C., Heil, A., Klimont, Z., Lee, D., Liousse, C., Mieville, A., Owen, B., Schultz, M. G., Shindell, D., Smith, S. J., Stehfest, E., Van Aardenne, J., Cooper, O. R., Kainuma, M., Mahowald, N., McConnell, J. R., Naik, V., Riahi, K., and van Vuuren, D. P.: Historical (1850–2000) gridded anthropogenic and biomass burning emissions of reactive gases and aerosols: methodology and application, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 7017-7039, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7017-2010, 2010. a
Lamarque, J.-F., Kyle, G. P., Meinshausen, M., Riahi, K., Smith, S. J., van
Vuuren, D. P., Conley, A. J., and Vitt, F.: Global and regional evolution of
short-lived radiatively-active gases and aerosols in the Representative
Concentration Pathways, Climatic Change, 109, 191–212,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0155-0,
2011. a
Le Quéré, C., Andrew, R. M., Friedlingstein, P., Sitch, S., Pongratz, J., Manning, A. C., Korsbakken, J. I., Peters, G. P., Canadell, J. G., Jackson, R. B., Boden, T. A., Tans, P. P., Andrews, O. D., Arora, V. K., Bakker, D. C. E., Barbero, L., Becker, M., Betts, R. A., Bopp, L., Chevallier, F., Chini, L. P., Ciais, P., Cosca, C. E., Cross, J., Currie, K., Gasser, T., Harris, I., Hauck, J., Haverd, V., Houghton, R. A., Hunt, C. W., Hurtt, G., Ilyina, T., Jain, A. K., Kato, E., Kautz, M., Keeling, R. F., Klein Goldewijk, K., Körtzinger, A., Landschützer, P., Lefèvre, N., Lenton, A., Lienert, S., Lima, I., Lombardozzi, D., Metzl, N., Millero, F., Monteiro, P. M. S., Munro, D. R., Nabel, J. E. M. S., Nakaoka, S., Nojiri, Y., Padin, X. A., Peregon, A., Pfeil, B., Pierrot, D., Poulter, B., Rehder, G., Reimer, J., Rödenbeck, C., Schwinger, J., Séférian, R., Skjelvan, I., Stocker, B. D., Tian, H., Tilbrook, B., Tubiello, F. N., van der Laan-Luijkx, I. T., van der Werf, G. R., van Heuven, S., Viovy, N., Vuichard, N., Walker, A. P., Watson, A. J., Wiltshire, A. J., Zaehle, S., and Zhu, D.: Global Carbon Budget 2017, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 10, 405–448, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-405-2018, 2018. a
Lindroth, A., Klemedtsson, L., Grelle, A., Weslien, P., and Langvall, O.:
Measurement of net ecosystem exchange, productivity and respiration in three
spruce forests in Sweden shows unexpectedly large soil carbon losses,
Biogeochem., 89, 43–60, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-007-9137-8,
2008. a
Lloyd, J. and Taylor, J. A.: On the temperature dependence of soil respiration,
Funct. Ecol., 8, 315–323,
1994. a
Ma, S., Baldocchi, D. D., Xu, L., and Hehn, T.: Inter-annual variability in
carbon dioxide exchange of an oak/grass savanna and open grassland in
California, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 147, 157–171,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2007.07.008,
2007. a, b
Massoud, E. C., Xu, C., Fisher, R. A., Knox, R. G., Walker, A. P., Serbin, S. P., Christoffersen, B. O., Holm, J. A., Kueppers, L. M., Ricciuto, D. M., Wei, L., Johnson, D. J., Chambers, J. Q., Koven, C. D., McDowell, N. G., and Vrugt, J. A.: Identification of key parameters controlling demographically structured vegetation dynamics in a land surface model: CLM4.5(FATES), Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 4133–4164, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4133-2019, 2019. a, b
Mauritsen, T., Bader, J., Becker, T., Behrens, J., Bittner, M., Brokopf, R.,
Brovkin, V., Claussen, M., Crueger, T., Esch, M., Fast, I., Fiedler, S.,
Fläschner, D., Gayler, V., Giorgetta, M., Goll, D. S., Haak, H.,
Hagemann, S., Hedemann, C., Hohenegger, C., Ilyina, T., Jahns, T., Jimenez
de la Cuesta Otero, D., Jungclaus, J., Kleinen, T., Kloster, S., Kracher, D.,
Kinne, S., Kleberg, D., Lasslop, G., Kornblueh, L., Marotzke, J., Matei, D.,
Meraner, K., Mikolajewicz, U., Modali, K., Möbis, B., Müller, W. A.,
Nabel, J. E. M. S., Nam, C. C. W., Notz, D., Nyawira, S.-S., Paulsen, H.,
Peters, K., Pincus, R., Pohlmann, H., Pongratz, J., Popp, M., Raddatz, T.,
Rast, S., Redler, R., Reick, C. H., Rohrschneider, T., Schemann, V., Schmidt,
H., Schnur, R., Schulzweida, U., Six, K. D., Stein, L., Stemmler, I.,
Stevens, B., von Storch, J.-S., Tian, F., Voigt, A., de Vrese, P., Wieners,
K.-H., Wilkenskjeld, S., Winkler, A., and Roeckner, E.: Developments in the
MPI-M Earth System Model version 1.2 (MPI-ESM 1.2) and its response to
increasing CO2, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 11, 998–1038, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001400,
2019. a
Medlyn, B. E., Zaehle, S., De Kauwe, M. G., Walker, A. P., Dietze, M. C.,
Hanson, P. J., Hickler, T., Jain, A. K., Luo, Y., Parton, W., Prentice,
I. C., Thornton, P. E., Wang, S., Wang, Y.-P., Weng, E., Iversen, C. M.,
McCarthy, H. R., Warren, J. M., Oren, R., and Norby, R. J.: Using ecosystem
experiments to improve vegetation models, Nat. Clim. Change, 5,
528–534, 2015. a
Medlyn, B. E., De Kauwe, M. G., Zaehle, S., Walker, A. P., Duursma, R. A.,
Luus, K., Mishurov, M., Pak, B., Smith, B., Wang, Y.-P., Yang, X., Crous,
K. Y., Drake, J. E., Gimeno, T. E., Macdonald, C. A., Norby, R. J., Power,
S. A., Tjoelker, M. G., and Ellsworth, D. S.: Using models to guide field
experiments: a priori predictions for the CO2 response of a nutrient-
and water-limited native Eucalypt woodland, Glob. Change Biol., 22,
2834–2851, 2016. a
Medlyn, B. E., De Kauwe, M. G., Lin, Y.-S., Knauer, J., Duursma, R. A.,
Williams, C. A., Arneth, A., Clement, R., Isaac, P., Limousin, J. M.,
Linderson, M.-L., Meir, P., Martin-StPaul, N., and Wingate, L.: How do leaf
and ecosystem measures of water-use efficiency compare?, New Phytol.,
216, 758–770, 2017. a, b
Mercado, L. M., Medlyn, B. E., Huntingford, C., Oliver, R. J., Clark, D. B.,
Sitch, S. A., Zelazowski, P., Kattge, J., Harper, A. B., and Cox, P. M.:
Large sensitivity in land carbon storage due to geographical and temporal
variation in the thermal response of photosynthetic capacity, New
Phytol., 218, 1462–1477, 2018. a
Meyerholt, J. and Zaehle, S.: The role of stoichiometric flexibility in
modelling forest ecosystem responses to nitrogen fertilization, New
Phytol., 208, 1042–1055, https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13547, 2015. a, b
Mkhabela, M., Amiro, B., Barr, A., Black, T., Hawthorne, I., Kidston, J.,
McCaughey, J., Orchansky, A., Nesic, Z., Sass, A., Shashkov, A., and Zha, T.:
Comparison of carbon dynamics and water use efficiency following fire and
harvesting in Canadian boreal forests, Agr. Forest Meteorol.,
149, 783–794, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2008.10.025,
2009. a
Papale, D., Reichstein, M., Aubinet, M., Canfora, E., Bernhofer, C., Kutsch, W., Longdoz, B., Rambal, S., Valentini, R., Vesala, T., and Yakir, D.: Towards a standardized processing of Net Ecosystem Exchange measured with eddy covariance technique: algorithms and uncertainty estimation, Biogeosciences, 3, 571–583, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-3-571-2006, 2006. a
Parton, W. J., Scurlock, J. M. O., Ojima, D. S., Gilmanov, T. G., Scholes,
R. J., Schimmel, D. S., Kirchner, T., Menaut, J. C., Seastedt, T., Moya,
E. G., Kamnalrut, A., and Kinyamario, J. I.: Observations and modelling of
biomass and soil organic matter dynamics for the grassland biome worldwide,
Global Biogeochem. Cy., 7, 785–809, 1993. a
Peng, J., Dan, L., and Huang, M.: Sensitivity of Global and Regional
Terrestrial Carbon Storage to the Direct CO2 Effect and Climate Change Based
on the CMIP5 Model Intercomparison, PLOS ONE, 9, 1–17,
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095282,
2014. a
Peñuelas, J., Poulter, B., Sardans, J., Ciais, P., van der Velde, M., Bopp,
L., Boucher, O., Godderis, Y., Hinsinger, P., Llusia, Joan Nardin, E., Vicca,
S., Obersteiner, M., and Janssens, I. A.: Human-induced
nitrogen–phosphorus imbalances alter natural and managed ecosystems across
the globe, Nat. Commun., 4, 2934, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3934,
2013. a
Prentice, I. C., Liang, X., Medlyn, B. E., and Wang, Y.-P.: Reliable, robust and realistic: the three R's of next-generation land-surface modelling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 5987-6005, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5987-2015, 2015. a
Raddatz, T. J., Reick, C. H., Knorr, W., Kattge, J., Roeckner, E., Schnur, R.,
Schnitzler, K.-G., Wetzel, P., and Jungclaus, J.: Will the tropical land
biosphere dominate the climate–carbon cycle feedback during the twenty-first
century?, Clim. Dynam., 29, 565–574, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-007-0247-8,
2007. a
Rebmann, C., Anthoni, P., E., F., Göckede, M., Mangold, A., Subke, J.-A.,
Thomas, C., Wichura, B., Schulze, E.-D., Tenhunen, J. D., and Foken, T.:
Carbon Budget of a Spruce Forest Ecosystem, in: Biogeochemistry of Forested
Catchments in a Changing Environment, edited by: Matzner, E.,
Springer, 143–159, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-06073-5_8, 2004. a
Reed, S. C., Townsend, A. R., Taylor, P. G., and Cleveland, C. C.: Phosphorus
Cycling in Tropical Forests Growing on Highly Weathered Soils, in: Phosphorus
in Action Biological Processes in Soil Phosphorus Cycling, edited by:
Bünemann, E., Oberson, A., and Frossard, E., Springer Berlin
Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 339–369, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15271-9, 2011. a
Reichstein, M., Falge, E., Baldocchi, D., Papale, D., Aubinet, M., Berbigier,
P., Bernhofer, C., Buchmann, N., Gilmanov, T., Granier, A., Grünwald, T.,
Havránková, K., Ilvesniemi, H., Janous, D., Knohl, A., Laurila, T., Lohila,
A., Loustau, D., Matteucci, G., Meyers, T., Miglietta, F., Ourcival, J.-M.,
Pumpanen, J., Rambal, S., Rotenberg, E., Sanz, M., Tenhunen, J., Seufert, G.,
Vaccari, F., Vesala, T., Yakir, D., and Valentini, R.: On the separation of
net ecosystem exchange into assimilation and ecosystem respiration: review
and improved algorithm, Glob. Change Biol., 11, 1424–1439,
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.001002.x,
2005. a
Roeckner, E., Tompkins, A., Bäuml, G., Bonaventura, L., Brokopf, R., Esch,
M., Giorgetta, M., Hagemann, S., Kirchner, I., Kornblueh, L., Manzini, E.,
Rhodin, E., Schlese, U., and Schulzweida, U.: The atmospheric general
circulation model ECHAM5 – Part I: Model description, Tech. Rep. 349, Max
Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, 2003. a
Roupsard, O., Bonnefond, J.-M., Irvine, M., Berbigier, P., Nouvellon, Y.,
Dauzat, J., Taga, S., Hamel, O., Jourdan, C., Saint-André, L., Mialet-Serra,
I., Labouisse, J.-P., Epron, D., Joffre, R., Braconnier, S., Rouzière, A.,
Navarro, M., and Bouillet, J.-P.: Partitioning energy and evapo-transpiration
above and below a tropical palm canopy, Agr. Forest Meteorol.,
139, 252–268, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2006.07.006,
2006. a
Sanz, M., Carrara, A., Gimeno, C., Bucher, A., and Lopez, R.: Effects of a dry
and warm summer conditions on CO2 and energy fluxes from three
Mediterranean ecosystems, Geophys. Res. Abstr., 6, 3239–3239,
2004. a
Saxton, K. E. and Rawls, W. J.: Soil Water Characteristic Estimates by Texture
and Organic Matter for Hydrologic Solutions, Soil Sci. Soc. Am.
J., 70, 1569–1578, 2006. a
Scherer-Lorenzen, M., Schulze, E.-D., Don, A., Schumacher, J., and Weller, E.:
Exploring the functional significance of forest diversity: A new long-term
experiment with temperate tree species (BIOTREE), Perspect. Plant
Ecol., 9, 53–70,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppees.2007.08.002,
2007. a
Schmid, H. P., Grimmond, C. B., Cropley, F., Offerle, B., and Su, H.-B.:
Measurements of CO2 and energy fluxes over a mixed hardwood forest in the
mid-western United States, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 103, 357–374, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1923(00)00140-4,
2000. a
Scott, R. L., Jenerette, G. D., Potts, D. L., and Huxman, T. E.: Effects of
seasonal drought on net carbon dioxide exchange from a woody-plant-encroached
semiarid grassland, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 114, G04004,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JG000900,
2009. a
Shinozaki, K., Yoda, K., Hozumi, K., and Kira, T.: A quantitative analysis of
the plant form – the pipe model theory, Japanese Journal of Ecology, 14,
98–104, 1964. a
Sitch, S., Friedlingstein, P., Gruber, N., Jones, S. D., Murray-Tortarolo, G., Ahlström, A., Doney, S. C., Graven, H., Heinze, C., Huntingford, C., Levis, S., Levy, P. E., Lomas, M., Poulter, B., Viovy, N., Zaehle, S., Zeng, N., Arneth, A., Bonan, G., Bopp, L., Canadell, J. G., Chevallier, F., Ciais, P., Ellis, R., Gloor, M., Peylin, P., Piao, S. L., Le Quéré, C., Smith, B., Zhu, Z., and Myneni, R.: Recent trends and drivers of regional sources and sinks of carbon dioxide, Biogeosciences, 12, 653–679, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-653-2015, 2015. a
Sitch, S. A., Smith, B., Prentice, I. C., Arneth, A., Bondeau, A., Cramer, W.,
Kaplan, J. O., Levis, S., Lucht, W., Sykes, M. T., and Venevsky, S.:
Evaluation of ecosystem dynamics, plant geography and terrestrial carbon
cycling in the LPJ Dynamic Global Vegetation Model, Glob. Change Biol.,
9, 161–185, 2003. a, b, c, d
Suni, T., Rinne, J., Reissell, A., Altimir, N., Keronen, P., Rannik, Ü.,
Dal Maso, M., Kulmala, M., and Vesala, T.: Long-term measurements of surface
fluxes above a Scots pine forest in Hyytiälä, southern Finland, 1996–2001,
Boreal Environ. Res., 8, 287–301, 2003. a
Swann, A. L. S., Hoffman, F. M., Koven, C. D., and Randerson, J. T.: Plant
responses to increasing CO2 reduce estimates of climate impacts on drought
severity, P. Natl. Acade. Sci. USA, 113,
10019–10024, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1604581113,
2016. a
Tedeschi, V., Rey, A., Manca, G., Valentini, R., Jarvis, P. G., and Borghetti,
M.: Soil respiration in a Mediterranean oak forest at different developmental
stages after coppicing, Glob. Change Biol., 12, 110–121,
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.01081.x,
2006. a
Thornton, P., Lamarque, J.-F., Rosenbloom, N. A., and Mahowald, N. M.:
Influence of carbon-nitrogen cycle coupling on land model response to CO2
fertilization and climate variability, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 21, GB4018,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GB002868, 2007. a
Thum, T., Zaehle, S., Köhler, P., Aalto, T., Aurela, M., Guanter, L., Kolari, P., Laurila, T., Lohila, A., Magnani, F., Van Der Tol, C., and Markkanen, T.: Modelling sun-induced fluorescence and photosynthesis with a land surface model at local and regional scales in northern Europe, Biogeosciences, 14, 1969–1987, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-1969-2017, 2017. a
Tirone, G., Dore, S., Matteucci, G., Greco, S., and Valentini, R.: Evergreen
Mediterranean Forests. Carbon and Water Fluxes, Balances, Ecological and
Ecophysiological Determinants, in: Fluxes of Carbon, Water and Energy of
European Forests, edited by: Valentini, R., Springer Berlin
Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg,125–149, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-05171-9_7,
2003. a
Urbanski, S., Barford, C., Wofsy, S., Kucharik, C., Pyle, E., Budney, J.,
McKain, K., Fitzjarrald, D., Czikowsky, M., and Munger, J. W.: Factors
controlling CO2 exchange on timescales from hourly to decadal at Harvard
Forest, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 112, G02020,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JG000293,
2007. a
Vargas, R., Sonnentag, O., Abramowitz, G., Carrara, A., Chen, J. M., Ciais, P.,
Correia, A., Keenan, T. F., Kobayashi, H., Ourcival, J.-M., Papale, D.,
Pearson, D., Pereira, J. S., Piao, S., Rambal, S., and Baldocchi, D. D.:
Drought Influences the Accuracy of Simulated Ecosystem Fluxes: A Model-Data
Meta-analysis for Mediterranean Oak Woodlands, Ecosystems, 16, 749–764,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-013-9648-1,
2013. a
Vicca, S., Luyssaert, S., Peñuelas, J., Campioli, M., Chapin III, F. S.,
Ciais, P., Heinemeyer, A., Hogberg, P., Kutsch, W. L., Law, B. E., Malhi, Y.,
Papale, D., Piao, S. L., Reichstein, M., Schulze, E. D., and Janssens, I. A.:
Fertile forests produce biomass more efficiently, Ecol. Lett., 15,
520–526, 2012. a, b, c, d
Viovy, N.: CRU-NCEP dataset, v7, available at:
https://vesg.ipsl.upmc.fr/thredds/catalog/store/p529viov/cruncep/V7_1901_2015/catalog.html (last access: 27 June 2017),
2016. a
Vitousek, P. M. and Howarth, R. W.: Nitrogen limitation on land and in the sea
– how it can occur, Biogeochem., 13, 87–115, 1991. a
Vitousek, P. M., Porder, S., Houlton, B. Z., and Chadwick, O. A.: Terrestrial
phosphorus limitation: mechanisms, implications, and nitrogen–phosphorus
interactions, Ecol. Appl., 20, 5–15, https://doi.org/10.1890/08-0127.1,
2010. a, b
Walker, T. W. and Syers, J. K.: The fate of phosphorus during pedogenesis,
Geoderma, 15, 1–19, https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7061(76)90066-5,
1976. a
Wang, Y. P., Law, R. M., and Pak, B.: A global model of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus cycles for the terrestrial biosphere, Biogeosciences, 7, 2261–2282, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-2261-2010, 2010. a, b, c, d
Wårlind, D., Smith, B., Hickler, T., and Arneth, A.: Nitrogen feedbacks increase future terrestrial ecosystem carbon uptake in an individual-based dynamic vegetation model, Biogeosciences, 11, 6131–6146, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-6131-2014, 2014. a
White, R. E.: Principles and Practice of Soil Science The soil as a Natural
Resource, vol. 32, Blackwell Publishing, Malden, 4th Edn.,
https://doi.org/10.1177/0340035206070163, 2006. a
Wohlfahrt, G., Anderson-Dunn, M., Bahn, M., Balzarolo, M., Berninger, F.,
Campbell, C., Carrara, A., Cescatti, A., Christensen, T., Dore, S., Eugster,
W., Friborg, T., Furger, M., Gianelle, D., Gimeno, C., Hargreaves, K., Hari,
P., Haslwanter, A., Johansson, T., Marcolla, B., Milford, C., Nagy, Z.,
Nemitz, E., Rogiers, N., Sanz, M. J., Siegwolf, R. T., Susiluoto, S., Sutton,
M., Tuba, Z., Ugolini, F., Valentini, R., Zorer, R., and Cernusca, A.:
Biotic, Abiotic, and Management Controls on the Net Ecosystem CO2 Exchange of
European Mountain Grassland Ecosystems, Ecosystems, 11, 1338–1351,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-008-9196-2,
2008a. a
Wohlfahrt, G., Hammerle, A., Haslwanter, A., Bahn, M., Tappeiner, U., and
Cernusca, A.: Seasonal and inter-annual variability of the net ecosystem CO2
exchange of a temperate mountain grassland: Effects of weather and
management, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, D08110,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009286,
2008b. a
Wramneby, A., Smith, B., Zaehle, S., and Sykes, M. T.: Parameter uncertainties
in the modelling of vegetation dynamics – Effects on tree community structure
and ecosystem functioning in European forest biomes, Ecol. Model.,
216, 277–290, 2008. a
Yang, X., Post, W. M., Thornton, P. E., and Jain, A.: The distribution of soil
phosphorus for global biogeochemical modeling, Biogeosciences, 10,
2525–2537, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-2525-2013, 2013.
a, b
Zaehle, S. and Dalmonech, D.: Carbon–nitrogen interactions on land
at global scales: current understanding in modelling climate biosphere
feedbacks, Curr. Opin. Env. Sust., 3, 311–320,
2011. a
Zaehle, S. and Friend, A. D.: Carbon and nitrogen cycle dynamics in the O-CN
land surface model: 1. Model description, site-scale evaluation, and
sensitivity to parameter estimates, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 24, GB1005, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GB003521, 2010. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m, n, o
Zaehle, S., Sitch, S. A., Smith, B., and Hatterman, F.: Effects of parameter
uncertainties on the modeling of terrestrial biosphere dynamics, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 19, GB3020,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GB002395, 2005. a, b, c, d
Zaehle, S., Friedlingstein, P., and Friend, A. D.: Terrestrial nitrogen
feedbacks may accelerate future climate change, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
37, L01401, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL041345,
2010. a
Zaehle, S., Ciais, P., Friend, A. D., and Prieur, V.: Carbon benefits of
anthropogenic reactive nitrogen offset by nitrous oxide emissions, Nat.
Geosci., 4, 601–605, 2011. a
Zaehle, S., Medlyn, B. E., De Kauwe, M. G., Walker, A. P., Dietze, M. C.,
Hickler, T., Luo, Y., Wang, Y.-P., El-Masri, B., Thornton, P., Jain, A.,
Wang, S., Warlind, D., Weng, E., Parton, W., Iversen, C. M., Gallet-Budynek,
A., McCarthy, H., Finzi, A., Hanson, P. J., Prentice, I. C., Oren, R., and
Norby, R. J.: Evaluation of 11 terrestrial carbon–nitrogen cycle models
against observations from two temperate Free-Air CO2 Enrichment studies, New
Phytol., 202, 803–822, https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12697,
2014. a, b
Zerihun, A., McKenzie, B. A., and Morton, J. D.: Photosynthate costs associated
with the utilization of different nitrogen–forms: influence on the carbon
balance of plants and shoot–root biomass partitioning, New Phytol.,
138, 1–11, 1998. a
Zheng, M., Zhou, Z., Luo, Y., Zhao, P., and Mo, J.: Global pattern and
controls of biological nitrogen fixation under nutrient enrichment: A
meta-analysis, Glob. Change Biol., 25, 3018–3030, 2019. a
Search articles
Short summary
To predict the response of the vegetation to climate change, we need global models that describe the relevant processes taking place in the vegetation. Recently, we have obtained more in-depth understanding of vegetation processes and the role of nutrients in the biogeochemical cycles. We have developed a new global vegetation model that includes carbon, water, nitrogen, and phosphorus cycles. We show that the model is successful in evaluation against a wide range of observations.
To predict the response of the vegetation to climate change, we need global models that describe...
Geoscientific Model Development
An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.