Articles | Volume 11, issue 5
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 1929–1969, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1929-2018
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 1929–1969, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1929-2018

Model description paper 29 May 2018

Model description paper | 29 May 2018

Overview of the Meso-NH model version 5.4 and its applications

Christine Lac et al.

Related authors

Hectometric-scale simulations of a Mediterranean heavy-precipitation event during the Hydrological cycle in the Mediterranean Experiment (HyMeX) first Special Observation Period (SOP1)
Olivier Nuissier, Fanny Duffourg, Maxime Martinet, Véronique Ducrocq, and Christine Lac
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 14649–14667, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-14649-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-14649-2020, 2020
Short summary
Implementation of an immersed boundary method in the Meso-NH v5.2 model: applications to an idealized urban environment
Franck Auguste, Géraldine Réa, Roberto Paoli, Christine Lac, Valery Masson, and Daniel Cariolle
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 2607–2633, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2607-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2607-2019, 2019
Short summary
Diurnal, synoptic and seasonal variability of atmospheric CO2 in the Paris megacity area
Irène Xueref-Remy, Elsa Dieudonné, Cyrille Vuillemin, Morgan Lopez, Christine Lac, Martina Schmidt, Marc Delmotte, Frédéric Chevallier, François Ravetta, Olivier Perrussel, Philippe Ciais, François-Marie Bréon, Grégoire Broquet, Michel Ramonet, T. Gerard Spain, and Christophe Ampe
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 3335–3362, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-3335-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-3335-2018, 2018
Short summary
Adaptation of the meteorological model Meso-NH to laboratory experiments: implementations and validation
Jeanne Colin, Christine Lac, Valéry Massion, and Alexandre Paci
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2017-226,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2017-226, 2017
Preprint withdrawn
Short summary
Large eddy simulation of radiation fog: impact of dynamics on the fog life cycle
Marie Mazoyer, Christine Lac, Odile Thouron, Thierry Bergot, Valery Masson, and Luc Musson-Genon
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 13017–13035, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-13017-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-13017-2017, 2017
Short summary

Related subject area

Atmospheric sciences
Incorporation of volcanic SO2 emissions in the Hemispheric CMAQ (H-CMAQ) version 5.2 modeling system and assessing their impacts on sulfate aerosol over the Northern Hemisphere
Syuichi Itahashi, Rohit Mathur, Christian Hogrefe, Sergey L. Napelenok, and Yang Zhang
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 5751–5768, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5751-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5751-2021, 2021
Short summary
Efficient ensemble generation for uncertain correlated parameters in atmospheric chemical models: a case study for biogenic emissions from EURAD-IM version 5
Annika Vogel and Hendrik Elbern
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 5583–5605, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5583-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5583-2021, 2021
Short summary
Position correction in dust storm forecasting using LOTOS-EUROS v2.1: grid-distorted data assimilation v1.0
Jianbing Jin, Arjo Segers, Hai Xiang Lin, Bas Henzing, Xiaohui Wang, Arnold Heemink, and Hong Liao
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 5607–5622, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5607-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5607-2021, 2021
Short summary
Atmosphere–ocean–aerosol–chemistry–climate model SOCOLv4.0: description and evaluation
Timofei Sukhodolov, Tatiana Egorova, Andrea Stenke, William T. Ball, Christina Brodowsky, Gabriel Chiodo, Aryeh Feinberg, Marina Friedel, Arseniy Karagodin-Doyennel, Thomas Peter, Jan Sedlacek, Sandro Vattioni, and Eugene Rozanov
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 5525–5560, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5525-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5525-2021, 2021
Short summary
Harmonized Emissions Component (HEMCO) 3.0 as a versatile emissions component for atmospheric models: application in the GEOS-Chem, NASA GEOS, WRF-GC, CESM2, NOAA GEFS-Aerosol, and NOAA UFS models
Haipeng Lin, Daniel J. Jacob, Elizabeth W. Lundgren, Melissa P. Sulprizio, Christoph A. Keller, Thibaud M. Fritz, Sebastian D. Eastham, Louisa K. Emmons, Patrick C. Campbell, Barry Baker, Rick D. Saylor, and Raffaele Montuoro
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 5487–5506, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5487-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5487-2021, 2021
Short summary

Cited articles

Abdul-Razzak, H. and Ghan, S. J.: Parameterization of the influence of organic surfactants on aerosol activation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, D03205, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD004043, 2004.
Anquetin, S., Yates, E., Ducrocq, V., Samouillan, S., Chancibault, K., Davolio, S., Accadia, C., Casaioli, M., Mariani, S., Ficca, G., Gozzini, B., Pasi, F., Pasqui, M., Garcia, A., Martorell, M., Romero, R., and Chessa, P.: The 8 and 9 September 2002 flash flood event in France: a model intercomparison, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 5, 741–754, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-5-741-2005, 2005.
Aouizerats, B., Thouron, O., Tulet, P., Mallet, M., Gomes, L., and Henzing, J. S.: Development of an online radiative module for the computation of aerosol optical properties in 3-D atmospheric models: validation during the EUCAARI campaign, Geosci. Model Dev., 3, 553–564, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-3-553-2010, 2010.
Arnault, J. and Roux, F.: Comparison between two case-studies of developing and non-developing African easterly waves during NAMMA and AMMA / SOP-3: Absolute vertical vorticity budget, Mon. Weather Rev., 138, 1420–1445, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009MWR3120.1, 2010.
Augros, C., Caumont, O., Ducrocq, V., Gaussiat, N., and Tabary, P.: Comparisons between S, C, and X band polarimetric radar observations and convective-scale simulations of HyMeX first special observing period, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 142, 347–362, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2572, 2016.