Articles | Volume 11, issue 5
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 1929–1969, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1929-2018
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 1929–1969, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1929-2018

Model description paper 29 May 2018

Model description paper | 29 May 2018

Overview of the Meso-NH model version 5.4 and its applications

Christine Lac et al.

Related authors

Demistify: a large-eddy simulation (LES) and single-column model (SCM) intercomparison of radiation fog
Ian Boutle, Wayne Angevine, Jian-Wen Bao, Thierry Bergot, Ritthik Bhattacharya, Andreas Bott, Leo Ducongé, Richard Forbes, Tobias Goecke, Evelyn Grell, Adrian Hill, Adele L. Igel, Innocent Kudzotsa, Christine Lac, Bjorn Maronga, Sami Romakkaniemi, Juerg Schmidli, Johannes Schwenkel, Gert-Jan Steeneveld, and Benoît Vié
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 319–333, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-319-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-319-2022, 2022
Short summary
Hectometric-scale simulations of a Mediterranean heavy-precipitation event during the Hydrological cycle in the Mediterranean Experiment (HyMeX) first Special Observation Period (SOP1)
Olivier Nuissier, Fanny Duffourg, Maxime Martinet, Véronique Ducrocq, and Christine Lac
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 14649–14667, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-14649-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-14649-2020, 2020
Short summary
Implementation of an immersed boundary method in the Meso-NH v5.2 model: applications to an idealized urban environment
Franck Auguste, Géraldine Réa, Roberto Paoli, Christine Lac, Valery Masson, and Daniel Cariolle
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 2607–2633, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2607-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2607-2019, 2019
Short summary
Diurnal, synoptic and seasonal variability of atmospheric CO2 in the Paris megacity area
Irène Xueref-Remy, Elsa Dieudonné, Cyrille Vuillemin, Morgan Lopez, Christine Lac, Martina Schmidt, Marc Delmotte, Frédéric Chevallier, François Ravetta, Olivier Perrussel, Philippe Ciais, François-Marie Bréon, Grégoire Broquet, Michel Ramonet, T. Gerard Spain, and Christophe Ampe
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 3335–3362, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-3335-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-3335-2018, 2018
Short summary
Adaptation of the meteorological model Meso-NH to laboratory experiments: implementations and validation
Jeanne Colin, Christine Lac, Valéry Massion, and Alexandre Paci
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2017-226,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2017-226, 2017
Preprint withdrawn
Short summary

Related subject area

Atmospheric sciences
Parameterization of the collision–coalescence process using series of basis functions: COLNETv1.0.0 model development using a machine learning approach
Camilo Fernando Rodríguez Genó and Léster Alfonso
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 493–507, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-493-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-493-2022, 2022
Short summary
Inline coupling of simple and complex chemistry modules within the global weather forecast model FIM (FIM-Chem v1)
Li Zhang, Georg A. Grell, Stuart A. McKeen, Ravan Ahmadov, Karl D. Froyd, and Daniel Murphy
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 467–491, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-467-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-467-2022, 2022
Short summary
Downscaling of air pollutants in Europe using uEMEP_v6
Qing Mu, Bruce Rolstad Denby, Eivind Grøtting Wærsted, and Hilde Fagerli
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 449–465, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-449-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-449-2022, 2022
Short summary
WRF v.3.9 sensitivity to land surface model and horizontal resolution changes over North America
Almudena García-García, Francisco José Cuesta-Valero, Hugo Beltrami, J. Fidel González-Rouco, and Elena García-Bustamante
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 413–428, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-413-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-413-2022, 2022
Short summary
Evaluation of the COSMO model (v5.1) in polarimetric radar space – impact of uncertainties in model microphysics, retrievals and forward operators
Prabhakar Shrestha, Jana Mendrok, Velibor Pejcic, Silke Trömel, Ulrich Blahak, and Jacob T. Carlin
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 291–313, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-291-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-291-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Abdul-Razzak, H. and Ghan, S. J.: Parameterization of the influence of organic surfactants on aerosol activation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, D03205, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD004043, 2004.
Anquetin, S., Yates, E., Ducrocq, V., Samouillan, S., Chancibault, K., Davolio, S., Accadia, C., Casaioli, M., Mariani, S., Ficca, G., Gozzini, B., Pasi, F., Pasqui, M., Garcia, A., Martorell, M., Romero, R., and Chessa, P.: The 8 and 9 September 2002 flash flood event in France: a model intercomparison, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 5, 741–754, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-5-741-2005, 2005.
Aouizerats, B., Thouron, O., Tulet, P., Mallet, M., Gomes, L., and Henzing, J. S.: Development of an online radiative module for the computation of aerosol optical properties in 3-D atmospheric models: validation during the EUCAARI campaign, Geosci. Model Dev., 3, 553–564, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-3-553-2010, 2010.
Arnault, J. and Roux, F.: Comparison between two case-studies of developing and non-developing African easterly waves during NAMMA and AMMA / SOP-3: Absolute vertical vorticity budget, Mon. Weather Rev., 138, 1420–1445, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009MWR3120.1, 2010.
Augros, C., Caumont, O., Ducrocq, V., Gaussiat, N., and Tabary, P.: Comparisons between S, C, and X band polarimetric radar observations and convective-scale simulations of HyMeX first special observing period, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 142, 347–362, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2572, 2016.