Articles | Volume 8, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-1085-2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-1085-2015
Development and technical paper
 | 
21 Apr 2015
Development and technical paper |  | 21 Apr 2015

Technical challenges and solutions in representing lakes when using WRF in downscaling applications

M. S. Mallard, C. G. Nolte, T. L. Spero, O. R. Bullock, K. Alapaty, J. A. Herwehe, J. Gula, and J. H. Bowden

Related authors

Learning-based prediction of the particles catchment area of deep ocean sediment traps
Théo Picard, Jonathan Gula, Ronan Fablet, Jeremy Collin, and Laurent Mémery
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2777,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2777, 2023
Short summary
Lightning assimilation in the WRF model (Version 4.1.1): technique updates and assessment of the applications from regional to hemispheric scales
Daiwen Kang, Nicholas K. Heath, Robert C. Gilliam, Tanya L. Spero, and Jonathan E. Pleim
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 8561–8579, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8561-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8561-2022, 2022
Short summary
Impacts of condensable particulate matter on atmospheric organic aerosols and fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in China
Mengying Li, Shaocai Yu, Xue Chen, Zhen Li, Yibo Zhang, Zhe Song, Weiping Liu, Pengfei Li, Xiaoye Zhang, Meigen Zhang, Yele Sun, Zirui Liu, Caiping Sun, Jingkun Jiang, Shuxiao Wang, Benjamin N. Murphy, Kiran Alapaty, Rohit Mathur, Daniel Rosenfeld, and John H. Seinfeld
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 11845–11866, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-11845-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-11845-2022, 2022
Short summary
Cloud-based framework for inter-comparing submesoscale-permitting realistic ocean models
Takaya Uchida, Julien Le Sommer, Charles Stern, Ryan P. Abernathey, Chris Holdgraf, Aurélie Albert, Laurent Brodeau, Eric P. Chassignet, Xiaobiao Xu, Jonathan Gula, Guillaume Roullet, Nikolay Koldunov, Sergey Danilov, Qiang Wang, Dimitris Menemenlis, Clément Bricaud, Brian K. Arbic, Jay F. Shriver, Fangli Qiao, Bin Xiao, Arne Biastoch, René Schubert, Baylor Fox-Kemper, William K. Dewar, and Alan Wallcraft
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 5829–5856, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5829-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5829-2022, 2022
Short summary
Development and evaluation of an advanced National Air Quality Forecasting Capability using the NOAA Global Forecast System version 16
Patrick C. Campbell, Youhua Tang, Pius Lee, Barry Baker, Daniel Tong, Rick Saylor, Ariel Stein, Jianping Huang, Ho-Chun Huang, Edward Strobach, Jeff McQueen, Li Pan, Ivanka Stajner, Jamese Sims, Jose Tirado-Delgado, Youngsun Jung, Fanglin Yang, Tanya L. Spero, and Robert C. Gilliam
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 3281–3313, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3281-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3281-2022, 2022
Short summary

Related subject area

Climate and Earth system modeling
The prototype NOAA Aerosol Reanalysis version 1.0: description of the modeling system and its evaluation
Shih-Wei Wei, Mariusz Pagowski, Arlindo da Silva, Cheng-Hsuan Lu, and Bo Huang
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 795–813, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-795-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-795-2024, 2024
Short summary
Performance and process-based evaluation of the BARPA-R Australasian regional climate model version 1
Emma Howard, Chun-Hsu Su, Christian Stassen, Rajashree Naha, Harvey Ye, Acacia Pepler, Samuel S. Bell, Andrew J. Dowdy, Simon O. Tucker, and Charmaine Franklin
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 731–757, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-731-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-731-2024, 2024
Short summary
Monsoon Mission Coupled Forecast System version 2.0: model description and Indian monsoon simulations
Deepeshkumar Jain, Suryachandra A. Rao, Ramu A. Dandi, Prasanth A. Pillai, Ankur Srivastava, Maheswar Pradhan, and Kiran V. Gangadharan
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 709–729, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-709-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-709-2024, 2024
Short summary
Exploring the ocean mesoscale at reduced computational cost with FESOM 2.5: efficient modeling strategies applied to the Southern Ocean
Nathan Beech, Thomas Rackow, Tido Semmler, and Thomas Jung
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 529–543, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-529-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-529-2024, 2024
Short summary
Truly conserving with conservative remapping methods
Karl E. Taylor
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 415–430, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-415-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-415-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Anyah, R. O. and Semazzi, F. H. M.: Simulation of the sensitivity of Lake Victoria basin climate to lake surface temperatures, Theor. Appl. Climatol., 79, 55–69, 2004.
Argent, R. E.: Customisation of the WRF model over the Lake Victoria basin in east Africa, MS thesis, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 124 pp., 2014.
Artale, V., Calmanti, S., Carillo, A., Dell'Aquila, A., Herrmann, M., Pisacane, G., Ruti, P. M., Sannino, G., Struglia, M. V., Giorgi, F., Bi, X., Pal, J. S., Rauscher, S., and The PROTHEUS Group: An atmosphere–ocean regional climate model for the Mediterranean area: assessment of a present climate simulation, Clim. Dynam., 35, 721–740, 2010.
Asnani, G. C.: Tropical Meteorology, Vol. 1 and 2, Indian Institute of Tropical Meteorology, Pashan, Pune, 1012 pp., 1993.
Assel, R. A. and Robertson, D. M.: Changes in winter air temperatures near Lake Michigan, 1851–1993, as determined from regional lake-ice records, Limnol. Oceanogr., 40, 165–176, 1995.
Download
Short summary
Because global climate models (GCMs) are typically run at coarse spatial resolution, lakes are often poorly resolved in their global fields. When downscaling such GCMs using the Weather Research & Forecasting (WRF) model, use of WRF’s default interpolation methods can result in unrealistic lake temperatures and ice cover, which can impact simulated air temperatures and precipitation. Here, alternative methods for setting lake variables in WRF downscaling applications are presented and compared.