Geoscientific Model Development
Geoscientific Model Development
GMD
Articles | Volume 8, issue 4
Articles | Volume 8, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-1085-2015
© Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-1085-2015
© Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Articles | Volume 8, issue 4
Development and technical paper
 | 
21 Apr 2015
Development and technical paper |  | 21 Apr 2015

Technical challenges and solutions in representing lakes when using WRF in downscaling applications

M. S. Mallard, C. G. Nolte, T. L. Spero, O. R. Bullock, K. Alapaty, J. A. Herwehe, J. Gula, and J. H. Bowden

Viewed

Total article views: 5,014 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
3,196 1,624 194 5,014 270 302
  • HTML: 3,196
  • PDF: 1,624
  • XML: 194
  • Total: 5,014
  • BibTeX: 270
  • EndNote: 302
Views and downloads (calculated since 27 Oct 2014)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 27 Oct 2014)
Latest update: 28 Nov 2025
Download
Short summary
Because global climate models (GCMs) are typically run at coarse spatial resolution, lakes are often poorly resolved in their global fields. When downscaling such GCMs using the Weather Research & Forecasting (WRF) model, use of WRF’s default interpolation methods can result in unrealistic lake temperatures and ice cover, which can impact simulated air temperatures and precipitation. Here, alternative methods for setting lake variables in WRF downscaling applications are presented and compared.
Read more
Share