Articles | Volume 19, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-447-2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-447-2026
Model evaluation paper
 | 
15 Jan 2026
Model evaluation paper |  | 15 Jan 2026

Evaluation of atmospheric sulfur dioxide simulated with the EMAC (version 2.55) Chemistry–Climate Model using satellite and ground-based observations

Ismail Makroum, Patrick Jöckel, Martin Dameris, Nicolas Theys, and Johannes De Leeuw

Related authors

Expanding spatial and temporal coverage of climate change functions: Assessment and comparison with aCCFs
Christine Frömming, Volker Grewe, Sigrun Matthes, Simone Dietmüller, Patrick Peter, Katrin Dahlmann, and Patrick Jöckel
J. Env. Com. Air Transp. Sys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/jecats-2026-7,https://doi.org/10.5194/jecats-2026-7, 2026
Preprint under review for JECATS
Short summary
Evaluation of stratospheric transport in three generations of Chemistry-Climate Models
Marta Abalos, Thomas Birner, Andreas Chrysanthou, Sean Davis, Alvaro de la Cámara, Sandip Dhomse, Hella Garny, Michaela I. Hegglin, Daan Hubert, Oksana Ivaniha, James Keeble, Marianna Linz, Daniele Minganti, Jessica Neu, David Plummer, Laura Saunders, Kasturi Shah, Gabriele Stiller, Kleareti Tourpali, Darryn Waugh, Nathan Luke Abraham, Hideharu Akiyoshi, Martyn P. Chipperfield, Patrick Jöckel, Béatrice Josse, Marion Marchand, Patrick Martineau, Olaf Morgenstern, Timofei Sukhodolov, Shingo Watanabe, and Yousuke Yamashita
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 5249–5291, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-5249-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-5249-2026, 2026
Short summary
High-frequency monitoring of SO2 plumes from moderate-scale volcanic eruptions using a synergy of GEO and LEO satellites: A case study of the 2024 Kanlaon eruption
Shangyi Liu, Yingjun Zheng, Mengya Sheng, Lu Lee, Chengli Qi, Feng Lu, Bruno Franco, Lieven Clarisse, Cathy Clerbaux, Nicolas Theys, Jhoon Kim, and Zhao-Cheng Zeng
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1745,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1745, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
AIRTRAC v2.0: a Lagrangian aerosol tagging submodel for the analysis of aviation SO4 transport patterns
Jin Maruhashi, Mattia Righi, Monica Sharma, Johannes Hendricks, Patrick Jöckel, Volker Grewe, and Irene C. Dedoussi
Geosci. Model Dev., 19, 2747–2784, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-2747-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-2747-2026, 2026
Short summary
An 18-year record of atmospheric sulphur dioxide (SO2) derived from IASI measurements
Lieven Clarisse, Bruno Franco, Lorenzo Fabris, Nicolas Theys, Juliette Hadji-Lazaro, Daniel Hurtmans, Cathy Clerbaux, and Pierre Coheur
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-186,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-186, 2026
Preprint under review for ESSD
Short summary

Cited articles

Aas, W., Mortier, A., Bowersox, V., Cherian, R., Faluvegi, G., Fagerli, H., Hand, J., Klimont, Z., Galy-Lacaux, C., Lehmann, C. M. B., Myhre, C. L., Myhre, G., Olivié, D., Sato, K., Quaas, J., Rao, P. S. P., Schulz, M., Shindell, D., Skeie, R. B., Stein, A., Takemura, T., Tsyro, S., Vet, R., and Xu, X.: Global and regional trends of atmospheric sulfur, Scientific Reports, 9, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-37304-0, 2019. a
Aas, W., Fagerli, H., Alastuey, A., Cavalli, F., Degorska, A., Feigenspan, S., Brenna, H., Gliß, J., Heinesen, D., Hueglin, C., Holubová, A., Jaffrezo, J.-L., Mortier, A., Murovec, M., Putaud, J.-P., Rüdiger, J., Simpson, D., Solberg, S., Tsyro, S., Tørseth, K., and Yttri, K. E.: Trends in Air Pollution in Europe, 2000–2019, Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 24, 230237, https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.230237, 2024. a
Albrecht, B. A.: Aerosols, Cloud Microphysics, and Fractional Cloudiness, Science, 245, 1227–1230, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.245.4923.1227, 1989. a
Andres, R. and Kasgnoc, A.: A time–averaged inventory of subaerial volcanic sulfur emissions, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 103, 25251–25261, https://doi.org/10.1029/98jd02091, 1998. a
Arias, P., Bellouin, N., Coppola, E., Jones, R., Krinner, G., Marotzke, J., Naik, V., Palmer, M., Plattner, G.-K., Rogelj, J., Rojas, M., Sillmann, J., Storelvmo, T., Thorne, P., and Trewin: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Technical Summary., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 33–144, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896.002, 2021. a, b
Download
Short summary
We use a state-of-the-art numerical chemistry-climate model to study the atmospheric sulfur dioxide budget. We simulate the atmospheric concentration of sulfur dioxide (SO2) and corresponding sulfur deposition fluxes and compare the results with observational data from a satellite instrument and with ground-based in-situ measurements. For the evaluation of the simulated atmospheric lifetime of SO2, we also simulate the fate of SO2 emitted by two volcanic eruptions that happened in 2019.
Share