Articles | Volume 19, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-447-2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-447-2026
Model evaluation paper
 | 
15 Jan 2026
Model evaluation paper |  | 15 Jan 2026

Evaluation of atmospheric sulfur dioxide simulated with the EMAC (version 2.55) Chemistry–Climate Model using satellite and ground-based observations

Ismail Makroum, Patrick Jöckel, Martin Dameris, Nicolas Theys, and Johannes De Leeuw

Related authors

An 18-year record of atmospheric sulphur dioxide (SO2) derived from IASI measurements
Lieven Clarisse, Bruno Franco, Lorenzo Fabris, Nicolas Theys, Juliette Hadji-Lazaro, Daniel Hurtmans, Cathy Clerbaux, and Pierre Coheur
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-186,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-186, 2026
Preprint under review for ESSD
Short summary
Enhanced characterization of SO2 plume height and column density using the second UV spectral band of TROPOMI
Lorenzo Fabris, Nicolas Theys, Lieven Clarisse, Bruno Franco, Jonas Vlietinck, Huan Yu, Hugues Brenot, Thomas Danckaert, Pascal Hedelt, and Michel Van Roozendael
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 19, 1801–1824, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-1801-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-1801-2026, 2026
Short summary
Uncertainties in recent tropical stratospheric and tropospheric ozone changes restrict our understanding of future total column ozone change
Sean Davis, William Ball, Yue Jia, Gabriel Chiodo, Justin Alsing, James Keeble, Hideharu Akiyoshi, Carlo Arosio, Ewa Bednarz, Andreas Chrysanthou, Melanie Coldewey-Egbers, Robert Damadeo, Sandip Dhomse, Mohamadou Diallo, Simone Dietmuller, Roland Eichinger, Stacey Frith, Birgit Hassler, Michaela Hegglin, Daan Hubert, Patrick Jöckel, Béatrice Josse, Natalya Kramarova, Diego Loyola, Eliane Maillard Barras, Marion Marchand, Olaf Morgenstern, David Plummer, Robert Portmann, Karen Rosenlof, Alexei Rozanov, Viktoria Sofieva, Johannes Staehelin, Timofei Sukhodolov, Kleareti Tourpali, Ronald Van der A, H. J. Ray Wang, Krzysztof Wargan, Shingo Watanabe, Mark Weber, Jeannette Wild, Yousuke Yamashita, and Jerry Ziemke
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-532,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-532, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
Retrieval of ultra-violet aerosol absorption from radiation measurements in young wildfire plumes
Jan-Lukas Tirpitz, Nathaniel Brockway, Santo Fedele Colosimo, Robert Spurr, Matt Christi, Samuel Hall, Kirk Ullmann, Vijay Natraj, Nicolas Theys, Johnathan Hair, Taylor Shingler, Rodney Weber, Ruchen Zhu, Jack Dibb, Richard Moore, Elizabeth Wiggins, and Jochen Stutz
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5541,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5541, 2026
Short summary
Global transport of upper-tropospheric tropical tracers: multi-year insights from idealized simulations
Lianet Hernández Pardo, Joachim Curtius, Patrick Jöckel, Moritz Menken, and Anna Possner
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4338,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4338, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary

Cited articles

Aas, W., Mortier, A., Bowersox, V., Cherian, R., Faluvegi, G., Fagerli, H., Hand, J., Klimont, Z., Galy-Lacaux, C., Lehmann, C. M. B., Myhre, C. L., Myhre, G., Olivié, D., Sato, K., Quaas, J., Rao, P. S. P., Schulz, M., Shindell, D., Skeie, R. B., Stein, A., Takemura, T., Tsyro, S., Vet, R., and Xu, X.: Global and regional trends of atmospheric sulfur, Scientific Reports, 9, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-37304-0, 2019. a
Aas, W., Fagerli, H., Alastuey, A., Cavalli, F., Degorska, A., Feigenspan, S., Brenna, H., Gliß, J., Heinesen, D., Hueglin, C., Holubová, A., Jaffrezo, J.-L., Mortier, A., Murovec, M., Putaud, J.-P., Rüdiger, J., Simpson, D., Solberg, S., Tsyro, S., Tørseth, K., and Yttri, K. E.: Trends in Air Pollution in Europe, 2000–2019, Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 24, 230237, https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.230237, 2024. a
Albrecht, B. A.: Aerosols, Cloud Microphysics, and Fractional Cloudiness, Science, 245, 1227–1230, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.245.4923.1227, 1989. a
Andres, R. and Kasgnoc, A.: A time–averaged inventory of subaerial volcanic sulfur emissions, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 103, 25251–25261, https://doi.org/10.1029/98jd02091, 1998. a
Arias, P., Bellouin, N., Coppola, E., Jones, R., Krinner, G., Marotzke, J., Naik, V., Palmer, M., Plattner, G.-K., Rogelj, J., Rojas, M., Sillmann, J., Storelvmo, T., Thorne, P., and Trewin: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Technical Summary., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 33–144, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896.002, 2021. a, b
Download
Short summary
We use a state-of-the-art numerical chemistry-climate model to study the atmospheric sulfur dioxide budget. We simulate the atmospheric concentration of sulfur dioxide (SO2) and corresponding sulfur deposition fluxes and compare the results with observational data from a satellite instrument and with ground-based in-situ measurements. For the evaluation of the simulated atmospheric lifetime of SO2, we also simulate the fate of SO2 emitted by two volcanic eruptions that happened in 2019.
Share