Articles | Volume 19, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-447-2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-447-2026
Model evaluation paper
 | 
15 Jan 2026
Model evaluation paper |  | 15 Jan 2026

Evaluation of atmospheric sulfur dioxide simulated with the EMAC (version 2.55) Chemistry–Climate Model using satellite and ground-based observations

Ismail Makroum, Patrick Jöckel, Martin Dameris, Nicolas Theys, and Johannes De Leeuw

Related authors

Transcontinental transport of a massive SO2 plume from the Tehran refinery explosion in March 2026 observed from space
Shangyi Liu, Cathy Clerbaux, Anne Boynard, Mingjian Gu, Chengli Qi, Bruno Franco, Lieven Clarisse, Shan Han, Mengya Sheng, Nicolas Theys, and Zhao-Cheng Zeng
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5017,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5017, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
A 19-year record of atmospheric sulphur dioxide (SO2) derived from IASI measurements
Lieven Clarisse, Bruno Franco, Lorenzo Fabris, Nicolas Theys, Juliette Hadji-Lazaro, Daniel Hurtmans, Cathy Clerbaux, and Pierre Coheur
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 18, 6667–6706, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-6667-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-6667-2026, 2026
Short summary
Downward transport of tropical upper-tropospheric aerosols: multi-year insights from idealized simulations
Lianet Hernández Pardo, Joachim Curtius, Patrick Jöckel, J. Moritz Menken, Christopher Pöhlker, Mira Pöhlker, and Anna Possner
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 12275–12293, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-12275-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-12275-2026, 2026
Short summary
Global atmospheric aerosol distributions and composition from the Earth's surface to the stratosphere
Matthias Kohl, Christoph Brühl, Holger Tost, Christos Xenofontos, Theodoros Christoudias, Sergey Gromov, Oliver Appel, Stephan Borrmann, Adam Bourassa, Pedro Campunzano-Jost, Yafang Cheng, Oliver Eppers, Karl D. Froyd, Bruna A. Holanda, Jose L. Jimenez, Patrick Jöckel, Philipp Joppe, Katharina Kaiser, Joseph M. Katich, Klaus Klingmüller, Franziska Köllner, Agnieszka Kupc, Anna Martin, Christopher Pöhlker, Mira L. Pöhlker, Ulrich Pöschl, Landon Rieger, Samuel Ruhl, Gregory P. Schill, Johannes Schneider, Christiane Schulz, Joshua P. Schwarz, Alexandra P. Tsimpidi, Ryan Vella, Christina J. Williamson, Yifan Yang, Daniel Zawada, Jos Lelieveld, and Andrea Pozzer
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3649,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3649, 2026
Short summary
Airborne remote sensing of nitrous acid in the troposphere: potential sources of excess HONO
Benjamin Weyland, Simon Rosanka, Domenico Taraborrelli, Birger Bohn, Andreas Zahn, Florian Obersteiner, Eric Förster, Mariano Mertens, Patrick Jöckel, Helmut Ziereis, Katharina Kaiser, Horst Fischer, John N. Crowley, Nijing Wang, Achim Edtbauer, Jonathan Williams, Maria Dolores Andrés Hernández, John P. Burrows, Flora Kluge, Meike K. Rotermund, Andre Butz, and Klaus Pfeilsticker
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 6825–6856, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-6825-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-6825-2026, 2026
Short summary

Cited articles

Aas, W., Mortier, A., Bowersox, V., Cherian, R., Faluvegi, G., Fagerli, H., Hand, J., Klimont, Z., Galy-Lacaux, C., Lehmann, C. M. B., Myhre, C. L., Myhre, G., Olivié, D., Sato, K., Quaas, J., Rao, P. S. P., Schulz, M., Shindell, D., Skeie, R. B., Stein, A., Takemura, T., Tsyro, S., Vet, R., and Xu, X.: Global and regional trends of atmospheric sulfur, Scientific Reports, 9, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-37304-0, 2019. a
Aas, W., Fagerli, H., Alastuey, A., Cavalli, F., Degorska, A., Feigenspan, S., Brenna, H., Gliß, J., Heinesen, D., Hueglin, C., Holubová, A., Jaffrezo, J.-L., Mortier, A., Murovec, M., Putaud, J.-P., Rüdiger, J., Simpson, D., Solberg, S., Tsyro, S., Tørseth, K., and Yttri, K. E.: Trends in Air Pollution in Europe, 2000–2019, Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 24, 230237, https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.230237, 2024. a
Albrecht, B. A.: Aerosols, Cloud Microphysics, and Fractional Cloudiness, Science, 245, 1227–1230, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.245.4923.1227, 1989. a
Andres, R. and Kasgnoc, A.: A time–averaged inventory of subaerial volcanic sulfur emissions, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 103, 25251–25261, https://doi.org/10.1029/98jd02091, 1998. a
Arias, P., Bellouin, N., Coppola, E., Jones, R., Krinner, G., Marotzke, J., Naik, V., Palmer, M., Plattner, G.-K., Rogelj, J., Rojas, M., Sillmann, J., Storelvmo, T., Thorne, P., and Trewin: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Technical Summary., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 33–144, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896.002, 2021. a, b
Download
Short summary
We use a state-of-the-art numerical chemistry-climate model to study the atmospheric sulfur dioxide budget. We simulate the atmospheric concentration of sulfur dioxide (SO2) and corresponding sulfur deposition fluxes and compare the results with observational data from a satellite instrument and with ground-based in-situ measurements. For the evaluation of the simulated atmospheric lifetime of SO2, we also simulate the fate of SO2 emitted by two volcanic eruptions that happened in 2019.
Share