Articles | Volume 19, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-447-2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-447-2026
Model evaluation paper
 | 
15 Jan 2026
Model evaluation paper |  | 15 Jan 2026

Evaluation of atmospheric sulfur dioxide simulated with the EMAC (version 2.55) Chemistry–Climate Model using satellite and ground-based observations

Ismail Makroum, Patrick Jöckel, Martin Dameris, Nicolas Theys, and Johannes De Leeuw

Data sets

RD1SD: EMAC CCMI-2022 hindcast simulations with specified dynamics, ERA-5, 1979-2019 P. Jöckel et al. https://doi.org/10.26050/WDCC/ESCiMo2_RD1SD

RD1SD: EMAC CCMI-2022 hindcast simulations with specified dynamics, ERA-5, 1979-2019 (additional data) P. Jöckel et al. https://www.wdc-climate.de/ui/entry?acronym=DKRZ_LTA_853_dsg0002

SO2 data of EMAC sensitivity simulations (eruption of Mt. Raikoke, 2019) I. Makroum et al. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15655676

Model code and software

The Modular Earth Submodel System MESSy Consortium https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15656328

Download
Short summary
We use a state-of-the-art numerical chemistry-climate model to study the atmospheric sulfur dioxide budget. We simulate the atmospheric concentration of sulfur dioxide (SO2) and corresponding sulfur deposition fluxes and compare the results with observational data from a satellite instrument and with ground-based in-situ measurements. For the evaluation of the simulated atmospheric lifetime of SO2, we also simulate the fate of SO2 emitted by two volcanic eruptions that happened in 2019.
Share