Geoscientific Model Development
Geoscientific Model Development
GMD
Articles | Volume 19, issue 21
Articles | Volume 19, issue 21
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-10321-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-10321-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 19, issue 21
Model evaluation paper
 | 
30 Oct 2026
Model evaluation paper |  | 30 Oct 2026

Towards high-fidelity simulations of coastal submesoscale baroclinic instabilities with MPAS-O (vE3SM3.0.0) – Part 1: Idealized experiments

Kyle E. Hinson, Dylan R. Schlichting, Robert D. Hetland, Darren Engwirda, Katherine M. Smith, Mark R. Petersen, and Kaila Uyeda

Viewed

Total article views: 737 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
502 184 51 737 57 56
  • HTML: 502
  • PDF: 184
  • XML: 51
  • Total: 737
  • BibTeX: 57
  • EndNote: 56
Views and downloads (calculated since 13 May 2026)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 13 May 2026)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 737 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 712 with geography defined and 25 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 30 Oct 2026
Download
Short summary
Physical dynamics of ocean flows at fine spatial scales are challenging for regional and global scale ocean models due to high computational effort associated with smaller grid cell sizes. We compared two ocean models: a regional model (ROMS; Regional Ocean Modeling System) and global model (MPAS-O; Model for Prediction Across Scales – Ocean) across a range of resolutions (10 km to 100 m) in an idealized domain, and found that their similarities may hold promise for future coupling between them.
Read more
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint