Articles | Volume 19, issue 21
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-10321-2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-10321-2026
Model evaluation paper
 | 
30 Oct 2026
Model evaluation paper |  | 30 Oct 2026

Towards high-fidelity simulations of coastal submesoscale baroclinic instabilities with MPAS-O (vE3SM3.0.0) – Part 1: Idealized experiments

Kyle E. Hinson, Dylan R. Schlichting, Robert D. Hetland, Darren Engwirda, Katherine M. Smith, Mark R. Petersen, and Kaila Uyeda

Data sets

Towards high-fidelity simulations of coastal submesoscale baroclinic instabilities with MPAS-O (vE3SM3.0.0) Part I: Data and Code Kyle Hinson et al. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23370806

Model code and software

Towards high-fidelity simulations of coastal submesoscale baroclinic instabilities with MPAS-O (vE3SM3.0.0) Part I: Data and Code Kyle Hinson et al. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23370806

Video supplement

MPASO_Bichan_AllResolutions_Day0_Day50.mp4; ROMS_Bichan_AllResolutions_Day0_Day50.mp4 Kyle Hinson, Dylan Schlichting, Robert Hetland, Darren Engwirda, Katherine Smith, Mark Petersen, and Kaila Uyeda https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23370806

Download
Short summary
Physical dynamics of ocean flows at fine spatial scales are challenging for regional and global scale ocean models due to high computational effort associated with smaller grid cell sizes. We compared two ocean models: a regional model (ROMS; Regional Ocean Modeling System) and global model (MPAS-O; Model for Prediction Across Scales – Ocean) across a range of resolutions (10 km to 100 m) in an idealized domain, and found that their similarities may hold promise for future coupling between them.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint