Articles | Volume 18, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1103-2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1103-2025
Model evaluation paper
 | 
26 Feb 2025
Model evaluation paper |  | 26 Feb 2025

Sensitivity of predicted ultrafine particle size distributions in Europe to different nucleation rate parameterizations using PMCAMx-UF v2.2

David Patoulias, Kalliopi Florou, and Spyros N. Pandis

Related authors

Significant spatial and temporal variation of the concentrations and chemical composition of ultrafine particulate matter over Europe
Konstantinos Mataras, Evangelia Siouti, David Patoulias, and Spyros Pandis
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3357,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3357, 2024
Short summary
Significant spatial gradients in new particle formation frequency in Greece during summer
Andreas Aktypis, Christos Kaltsonoudis, David Patoulias, Panayiotis Kalkavouras, Angeliki Matrali, Christina N. Vasilakopoulou, Evangelia Kostenidou, Kalliopi Florou, Nikos Kalivitis, Aikaterini Bougiatioti, Konstantinos Eleftheriadis, Stergios Vratolis, Maria I. Gini, Athanasios Kouras, Constantini Samara, Mihalis Lazaridis, Sofia-Eirini Chatoutsidou, Nikolaos Mihalopoulos, and Spyros N. Pandis
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 65–84, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-65-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-65-2024, 2024
Short summary
New particle formation and growth during summer in an urban environment: a dual chamber study
Spiro D. Jorga, Kalliopi Florou, David Patoulias, and Spyros N. Pandis
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 85–97, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-85-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-85-2023, 2023
Short summary
Simulation of the effects of low-volatility organic compounds on aerosol number concentrations in Europe
David Patoulias and Spyros N. Pandis
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 1689–1706, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-1689-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-1689-2022, 2022
Short summary
Contribution of traffic-originated nanoparticle emissions to regional and local aerosol levels
Miska Olin, David Patoulias, Heino Kuuluvainen, Jarkko V. Niemi, Topi Rönkkö, Spyros N. Pandis, Ilona Riipinen, and Miikka Dal Maso
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 1131–1148, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-1131-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-1131-2022, 2022
Short summary

Related subject area

Atmospheric sciences
ClimKern v1.2: a new Python package and kernel repository for calculating radiative feedbacks
Tyler P. Janoski, Ivan Mitevski, Ryan J. Kramer, Michael Previdi, and Lorenzo M. Polvani
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 3065–3079, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3065-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3065-2025, 2025
Short summary
Accounting for effects of coagulation and model uncertainties in particle number concentration estimates based on measurements from sampling lines – a Bayesian inversion approach with SLIC v1.0
Matti Niskanen, Aku Seppänen, Henri Oikarinen, Miska Olin, Panu Karjalainen, Santtu Mikkonen, and Kari Lehtinen
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2983–3001, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2983-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2983-2025, 2025
Short summary
Top-down CO emission estimates using TROPOMI CO data in the TM5-4DVAR (r1258) inverse modeling suit
Johann Rasmus Nüß, Nikos Daskalakis, Fabian Günther Piwowarczyk, Angelos Gkouvousis, Oliver Schneising, Michael Buchwitz, Maria Kanakidou, Maarten C. Krol, and Mihalis Vrekoussis
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2861–2890, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2861-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2861-2025, 2025
Short summary
The Multi-Compartment Hg Modeling and Analysis Project (MCHgMAP): mercury modeling to support international environmental policy
Ashu Dastoor, Hélène Angot, Johannes Bieser, Flora Brocza, Brock Edwards, Aryeh Feinberg, Xinbin Feng, Benjamin Geyman, Charikleia Gournia, Yipeng He, Ian M. Hedgecock, Ilia Ilyin, Jane Kirk, Che-Jen Lin, Igor Lehnherr, Robert Mason, David McLagan, Marilena Muntean, Peter Rafaj, Eric M. Roy, Andrei Ryjkov, Noelle E. Selin, Francesco De Simone, Anne L. Soerensen, Frits Steenhuisen, Oleg Travnikov, Shuxiao Wang, Xun Wang, Simon Wilson, Rosa Wu, Qingru Wu, Yanxu Zhang, Jun Zhou, Wei Zhu, and Scott Zolkos
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2747–2860, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2747-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2747-2025, 2025
Short summary
Similarity-based analysis of atmospheric organic compounds for machine learning applications
Hilda Sandström and Patrick Rinke
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2701–2724, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2701-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2701-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Adams, P. J. and Seinfeld, J. H.: Predicting global aerosol size distributions in general circulation models, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 107, 4370, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001010, 2002. 
Anttila, T. and Kerminen, V.-M.: Condensational growth of atmospheric nuclei by organic vapours, J. Aerosol Sci., 34, 41–61, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-8502(02)00155-6, 2003. 
Baranizadeh, E., Murphy, B. N., Julin, J., Falahat, S., Reddington, C. L., Arola, A., Ahlm, L., Mikkonen, S., Fountoukis, C., Patoulias, D., Minikin, A., Hamburger, T., Laaksonen, A., Pandis, S. N., Vehkamäki, H., Lehtinen, K. E. J., and Riipinen, I.: Implementation of state-of-the-art ternary new-particle formation scheme to the regional chemical transport model PMCAMx-UF in Europe, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 2741–2754, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-2741-2016, 2016. 
Carter, W. P. L.: Implementation of the SAPRC-99 Chemical Mechanism Into the Models-3 Framework, Rep. to United States Environ. Prot. Agency, 1–101, https://intra.engr.ucr.edu/~carter/pubs/s99mod3.pdf (last access: 26 June 2024), 2000. 
Download
Short summary
The effect of the assumed atmospheric nucleation mechanism on particle number concentrations and size distribution was investigated. Two quite different mechanisms involving sulfuric acid and ammonia or a biogenic organic vapor gave quite similar results which were consistent with measurements at 26 measurement stations across Europe. The number of larger particles that serve as cloud condensation nuclei showed little sensitivity to the assumed nucleation mechanism.

Share