Articles | Volume 17, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1585-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1585-2024
Model experiment description paper
 | 
22 Feb 2024
Model experiment description paper |  | 22 Feb 2024

New model ensemble reveals how forcing uncertainty and model structure alter climate simulated across CMIP generations of the Community Earth System Model

Marika M. Holland, Cecile Hannay, John Fasullo, Alexandra Jahn, Jennifer E. Kay, Michael Mills, Isla R. Simpson, William Wieder, Peter Lawrence, Erik Kluzek, and David Bailey

Related authors

Defining Antarctic polynyas in satellite observations and climate model output to support ecological climate change research
Laura L. Landrum, Alice K. DuVivier, Marika M. Holland, Kristen Krumhardt, and Zephyr Sylvester
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3490,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3490, 2024
Short summary
The Seasonal-to-Multiyear Large Ensemble (SMYLE) prediction system using the Community Earth System Model version 2
Stephen G. Yeager, Nan Rosenbloom, Anne A. Glanville, Xian Wu, Isla Simpson, Hui Li, Maria J. Molina, Kristen Krumhardt, Samuel Mogen, Keith Lindsay, Danica Lombardozzi, Will Wieder, Who M. Kim, Jadwiga H. Richter, Matthew Long, Gokhan Danabasoglu, David Bailey, Marika Holland, Nicole Lovenduski, Warren G. Strand, and Teagan King
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 6451–6493, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6451-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6451-2022, 2022
Short summary
Influences of changing sea ice and snow thicknesses on simulated Arctic winter heat fluxes
Laura L. Landrum and Marika M. Holland
The Cryosphere, 16, 1483–1495, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-1483-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-1483-2022, 2022
Short summary
Arctic sea ice sensitivity to lateral melting representation in a coupled climate model
Madison M. Smith, Marika Holland, and Bonnie Light
The Cryosphere, 16, 419–434, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-419-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-419-2022, 2022
Short summary
The influence of snow on sea ice as assessed from simulations of CESM2
Marika M. Holland, David Clemens-Sewall, Laura Landrum, Bonnie Light, Donald Perovich, Chris Polashenski, Madison Smith, and Melinda Webster
The Cryosphere, 15, 4981–4998, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-4981-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-4981-2021, 2021
Short summary

Related subject area

Climate and Earth system modeling
A new metrics framework for quantifying and intercomparing atmospheric rivers in observations, reanalyses, and climate models
Bo Dong, Paul Ullrich, Jiwoo Lee, Peter Gleckler, Kristin Chang, and Travis A. O'Brien
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 961–976, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-961-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-961-2025, 2025
Short summary
The real challenges for climate and weather modelling on its way to sustained exascale performance: a case study using ICON (v2.6.6)
Panagiotis Adamidis, Erik Pfister, Hendryk Bockelmann, Dominik Zobel, Jens-Olaf Beismann, and Marek Jacob
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 905–919, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-905-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-905-2025, 2025
Short summary
Improving the representation of major Indian crops in the Community Land Model version 5.0 (CLM5) using site-scale crop data
Kangari Narender Reddy, Somnath Baidya Roy, Sam S. Rabin, Danica L. Lombardozzi, Gudimetla Venkateswara Varma, Ruchira Biswas, and Devavat Chiru Naik
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 763–785, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-763-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-763-2025, 2025
Short summary
Evaluation of CORDEX ERA5-forced NARCliM2.0 regional climate models over Australia using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model version 4.1.2
Giovanni Di Virgilio, Fei Ji, Eugene Tam, Jason P. Evans, Jatin Kala, Julia Andrys, Christopher Thomas, Dipayan Choudhury, Carlos Rocha, Yue Li, and Matthew L. Riley
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 703–724, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-703-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-703-2025, 2025
Short summary
Design, evaluation, and future projections of the NARCliM2.0 CORDEX-CMIP6 Australasia regional climate ensemble
Giovanni Di Virgilio, Jason P. Evans, Fei Ji, Eugene Tam, Jatin Kala, Julia Andrys, Christopher Thomas, Dipayan Choudhury, Carlos Rocha, Stephen White, Yue Li, Moutassem El Rafei, Rishav Goyal, Matthew L. Riley, and Jyothi Lingala
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 671–702, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-671-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-671-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Bacmeister, J. T., Hannay, C., Medeiros, B., Gettelman, A., Neale, R., Fredriksen, H. B., Lipscomb, W. H., Simpson, I., Bailey, D. A., Holland, M., Lindsay, K., and Otto-Bliesner, B.: CO2 increase experiments using the CESM: Relationship to climate sensitivity and comparison of CESM1 to CESM2, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 12, e2020MS002120, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020MS002120, 2020. 
CESM2_LE_OUTPUT: Model output for CESM2-LE presented in Rodgers et al., 2021, UCAR [data set], https://doi.org/10.26024/kgmp-c556, 2024. 
Computational and Information Systems Laboratory: Cheyenne: HPE/SGI ICE XA System (NCAR Community Computing), Boulder, CO, National Center for Atmospheric Research, https://doi.org/10.5065/D6RX99HX, 2019. 
DeRepentigny, P., Jahn, A., Holland, M. M., and Smith, A.: Arctic sea ice in two congiruations of the CESM2 during the 20th and 21st centuries, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JC016133, 2020. 
Download
Short summary
Climate evolves in response to changing forcings, as prescribed in simulations. Models and forcings are updated over time to reflect new understanding. This makes it difficult to attribute simulation differences to either model or forcing changes. Here we present new simulations which enable the separation of model structure and forcing influence between two widely used simulation sets. Results indicate a strong influence of aerosol emission uncertainty on historical climate.
Share