Articles | Volume 16, issue 24
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-7375-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-7375-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Review and perspective paper
| 
19 Dec 2023
Review and perspective paper |
| 19 Dec 2023
| 19 Dec 2023
Perspectives of physics-based machine learning strategies for geoscientific applications governed by partial differential equations
Denise Degen
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Computational Geoscience, Geothermics and Reservoir Geophysics (CG3), RWTH Aachen University, Mathieustraße 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany
Daniel Caviedes Voullième
Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich Supercomputing Centre (JSC), Simulation and Data Lab. Terrestrial Systems, Wilhelm-Johnen-Straße, 52425 Jülich, Germany
Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Agrosphere, IBG-3, Wilhelm-Johnen-Straße, 52425 Jülich, Germany
Susanne Buiter
RWTH Aachen University, Tectonics and Geodyamics (TAG), Lochnerstraße 4-20, 52064 Aachen, Germany
Helmholtz Centre Potsdam – GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Telegrafenberg, 14473 Potsdam, Germany
Harrie-Jan Hendricks Franssen
Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Agrosphere, IBG-3, Wilhelm-Johnen-Straße, 52425 Jülich, Germany
Centre for High-Performance Computing Terrestrial Systems, Geoverbund ABC/J, Wilhelm-Johnen-Straße, 52425 Jülich, Germany
Harry Vereecken
Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Agrosphere, IBG-3, Wilhelm-Johnen-Straße, 52425 Jülich, Germany
Centre for High-Performance Computing Terrestrial Systems, Geoverbund ABC/J, Wilhelm-Johnen-Straße, 52425 Jülich, Germany
Ana González-Nicolás
Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich Supercomputing Centre (JSC), Simulation and Data Lab. Terrestrial Systems, Wilhelm-Johnen-Straße, 52425 Jülich, Germany
Florian Wellmann
Computational Geoscience, Geothermics and Reservoir Geophysics (CG3), RWTH Aachen University, Mathieustraße 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany
Fraunhofer Research Institution for Energy Infrastructures and Geothermal Systems (IEG), Am Hochschulcampus 1, 44801 Bochum, Germany
Related authors
Denise Degen, Moritz Ziegler, Oliver Heidbach, Andreas Henk, Karsten Reiter, and Florian Wellmann
Solid Earth, 16, 477–502, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-16-477-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-16-477-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Obtaining reliable estimates of the subsurface state distributions is essential to determine the location of, e.g., potential nuclear waste disposal sites. However, providing these is challenging since it requires solving the problem numerous times, yielding high computational cost. To overcome this, we use a physics-based machine learning method to construct surrogate models. We demonstrate how it produces physics-preserving predictions, which differentiates it from purely data-driven approaches.
Denise Degen, Ajay Kumar, Magdalena Scheck-Wenderoth, and Mauro Cacace
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1925, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1925, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Geodynamical simulations cover a wide spatial and temporal range and are crucial to understand and assess the evolution of the Earth system. To enable computationally efficient modeling approaches that can account for potentially unknown subsurface properties, we present a surrogate modeling technique. This technique combines physics-based and machine-learning techniques to enable reliable predictions of geodynamical applications, as we illustrate for the case study of the Alpine Region.
Denise Degen, Cameron Spooner, Magdalena Scheck-Wenderoth, and Mauro Cacace
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 7133–7153, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7133-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7133-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
In times of worldwide energy transitions, an understanding of the subsurface is increasingly important to provide renewable energy sources such as geothermal energy. To validate our understanding of the subsurface we require data. However, the data are usually not distributed equally and introduce a potential misinterpretation of the subsurface. Therefore, in this study we investigate the influence of measurements on temperature distribution in the European Alps.
Denise Degen and Mauro Cacace
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 1699–1719, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1699-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1699-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
In this work, we focus on improving the understanding of subsurface processes with respect to interactions with climate dynamics. We present advanced, open-source mathematical methods that enable us to investigate the influence of various model properties on the final outcomes. By relying on our approach, we have been able to showcase their importance in improving our understanding of the subsurface and highlighting the current shortcomings of currently adopted models.
Friedrich Carl, Peter Achtziger-Zupančič, Jian Yang, Marlise Colling Cassel, and Florian Wellmann
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3203, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3203, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Solid Earth (SE).
Short summary
Short summary
A method for shape quantification based on geometrical parameters is proposed alongside a set of regular geometries established as geomodeling benchmarks. Dimensions, gradient and curvature data is obtained on cross-sections. Data analyses provide insight into the main geometrical characteristics of the benchmark models and visualizes geometrical dis-/similarities between bodies. The method and benchmarks are usable in geomodeling workflows and structural comparisons based on sparse data.
Shiao Feng, Wenhong Wang, Yonggen Zhang, Zhongwang Wei, Jianzhi Dong, Lutz Weihermüller, and Harry Vereecken
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-410, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-410, 2025
Preprint under review for ESSD
Short summary
Short summary
Soil moisture is key for weather, farming, and ecosystems, but global datasets have gaps and biases. We compared three products against 1,615 stations with more than 1.9 million measured moisture, finding ERA5-Land highly correlated but biased high, and SMAP-L4 accurate but short-term. Fusing them created an enhanced dataset, improving correlation by 5%, reducing errors by 20%, and enhancing overall fit by 15%. This seamless resource aids drought tracking, water planning, and climate adaptation.
Jordan Bates, Carsten Montzka, Harry Vereecken, and François Jonard
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3919, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3919, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Biogeosciences (BG).
Short summary
Short summary
We used unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) with advanced cameras and laser scanning to measure crop water use and detect early signs of plant stress. By combining 3D views of crop structure with surface temperature and reflectance data, we improved estimates of water loss, especially in dense crops like wheat. This approach can help farmers use water more efficiently, respond quickly to stress, and support sustainable agriculture in a changing climate.
Denise Degen, Moritz Ziegler, Oliver Heidbach, Andreas Henk, Karsten Reiter, and Florian Wellmann
Solid Earth, 16, 477–502, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-16-477-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-16-477-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Obtaining reliable estimates of the subsurface state distributions is essential to determine the location of, e.g., potential nuclear waste disposal sites. However, providing these is challenging since it requires solving the problem numerous times, yielding high computational cost. To overcome this, we use a physics-based machine learning method to construct surrogate models. We demonstrate how it produces physics-preserving predictions, which differentiates it from purely data-driven approaches.
Fang Li, Heye Reemt Bogena, Johannes Keller, Bagher Bayat, Rahul Raj, and Harrie-Jan Hendricks-Franssen
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2124, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2124, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We developed a new method to improve hydrological modeling by jointly using soil moisture and groundwater level data from field sensors in a catchment in Germany. By updating the model separately for shallow and deep soil zones, we achieved more accurate predictions of soil water, groundwater depth, and evapotranspiration. Our results show that combining both data types gives more balanced and reliable outcomes than using either alone.
Heye Reemt Bogena, Frank Herrmann, Andreas Lücke, Thomas Pütz, and Harry Vereecken
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-185, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-185, 2025
Preprint under review for ESSD
Short summary
Short summary
The Wüstebach catchment in Germany’s TERENO network underwent partial deforestation in 2013 to support natural regrowth in Eifel National Park. This data paper presents 16 years (2010–2024) of estimated hourly stream-water flux data for nine macro- and micronutrients, dissolved ionic aluminum, and dissolved organic carbon, along with measured solute concentrations and discharge rates from two stations—one affected by clear-cutting and one unaffected.
Denise Degen, Ajay Kumar, Magdalena Scheck-Wenderoth, and Mauro Cacace
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1925, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1925, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Geodynamical simulations cover a wide spatial and temporal range and are crucial to understand and assess the evolution of the Earth system. To enable computationally efficient modeling approaches that can account for potentially unknown subsurface properties, we present a surrogate modeling technique. This technique combines physics-based and machine-learning techniques to enable reliable predictions of geodynamical applications, as we illustrate for the case study of the Alpine Region.
Pablo Vallés, Mario Morales-Hernández, Volker Roeber, Pilar García-Navarro, and Daniel Caviedes-Voullième
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-722, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-722, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study presents a computational model for passive particle transport in water. Their trajectories depend on advection and turbulence, represented by a random-walk model. Three numerical methods are compared to estimate their trajectory, evaluating accuracy and computational cost. Tests show that the Euler method offers the best balance. Finally, a rainfall event in a catchment is simulated to validate the model’s performance over irregular terrain.
Manuela S. Kaufmann, Anja Klotzsche, Jan van der Kruk, Anke Langen, Harry Vereecken, and Lutz Weihermüller
SOIL, 11, 267–285, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-11-267-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-11-267-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
To use fertilizers more effectively, non-invasive geophysical methods can be used to understand nutrient distributions in the soil. We utilize, in a long-term field study, geophysical techniques to study soil properties and conditions under different fertilizer treatments. We compared the geophysical response with soil samples and soil sensor data. In particular, electromagnetic induction and electrical resistivity tomography were effective in monitoring changes in nitrate levels over time.
Bamidele Oloruntoba, Stefan Kollet, Carsten Montzka, Harry Vereecken, and Harrie-Jan Hendricks Franssen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 1659–1683, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1659-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1659-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We studied how soil and weather data affect land model simulations over Africa. By combining soil data processed in different ways with weather data of varying time intervals, we found that weather inputs had a greater impact on water processes than soil data type. However, the way soil data were processed became crucial when paired with high-frequency weather inputs, showing that detailed weather data can improve local and regional predictions of how water moves and interacts with the land.
Zoltán Erdős, Susanne J. H. Buiter, and Joya L. Tetreault
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1065, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1065, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We used computer models to study how mountains formed by the collision of tectonic plates can later affect the breakup of these same plates. Our results show that in large, warm mountain belts, new faults form due to the orogen being overall weak, while in smaller, colder belts, breakup follows old fault zones. Microcontinents that were accreted during collision can create new continental fragments during extension. These findings help explain how past geological events shape continent margins.
Salar Saeed Dogar, Cosimo Brogi, Dave O'Leary, Ixchel Hernández-Ochoa, Marco Donat, Harry Vereecken, and Johan Alexander Huisman
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-827, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-827, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Farmers need precise information about their fields to use water, fertilizers, and other resources efficiently. This study combines underground soil data and satellite images to create detailed field maps using advanced machine learning. By testing different ways of processing data, we ensured a balanced and accurate approach. The results help farmers manage their land more effectively, leading to better harvests and more sustainable farming practices.
Zhi Li, Gregor Rickert, Na Zheng, Zhibo Zhang, Ilhan Özgen-Xian, and Daniel Caviedes-Voullième
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 547–562, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-547-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-547-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We introduce SERGHEI-RE, a 3D subsurface flow simulator with performance-portable parallel computing capabilities. SERGHEI-RE performs effectively on various computational devices: from personal computers to advanced clusters. It allows users to solve flow equations with multiple numerical schemes, making it adaptable to various hydrological scenarios. Testing results show its accuracy and performance, confirming that SERGHEI-RE is a powerful tool for hydrological research.
Paolo Nasta, Günter Blöschl, Heye R. Bogena, Steffen Zacharias, Roland Baatz, Gabriëlle De Lannoy, Karsten H. Jensen, Salvatore Manfreda, Laurent Pfister, Ana M. Tarquis, Ilja van Meerveld, Marc Voltz, Yijian Zeng, William Kustas, Xin Li, Harry Vereecken, and Nunzio Romano
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 465–483, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-465-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-465-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The Unsolved Problems in Hydrology (UPH) initiative has emphasized the need to establish networks of multi-decadal hydrological observatories to tackle catchment-scale challenges on a global scale. This opinion paper provocatively discusses two endmembers of possible future hydrological observatory (HO) networks for a given hypothesized community budget: a comprehensive set of moderately instrumented observatories or, alternatively, a small number of highly instrumented supersites.
Christian Poppe Terán, Bibi S. Naz, Harry Vereecken, Roland Baatz, Rosie A. Fisher, and Harrie-Jan Hendricks Franssen
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 287–317, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-287-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-287-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Carbon and water exchanges between the atmosphere and the land surface contribute to water resource availability and climate change mitigation. Land surface models, like the Community Land Model version 5 (CLM5), simulate these. This study finds that CLM5 and other data sets underestimate the magnitudes of and variability in carbon and water exchanges for the most abundant plant functional types compared to observations. It provides essential insights for further research into these processes.
Teng Xu, Sinan Xiao, Sebastian Reuschen, Nils Wildt, Harrie-Jan Hendricks Franssen, and Wolfgang Nowak
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 5375–5400, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-5375-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-5375-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We provide a set of benchmarking scenarios for geostatistical inversion, and we encourage the scientific community to use these to compare their newly developed methods. To facilitate transparent, appropriate, and uncertainty-aware comparison of novel methods, we provide some accurate reference solutions, a high-end reference algorithm, and a diverse set of benchmarking metrics, all of which are publicly available. With this, we seek to foster more targeted and transparent progress in the field.
Ying Zhao, Mehdi Rahmati, Harry Vereecken, and Dani Or
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4059–4063, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4059-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4059-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Gao et al. (2023) question the importance of soil in hydrology, sparking debate. We acknowledge some valid points but critique their broad, unsubstantiated views on soil's role. Our response highlights three key areas: (1) the false divide between ecosystem-centric and soil-centric approaches, (2) the vital yet varied impact of soil properties, and (3) the call for a scale-aware framework. We aim to unify these perspectives, enhancing hydrology's comprehensive understanding.
Shahin Khosh Bin Ghomash, Heiko Apel, and Daniel Caviedes-Voullième
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 2857–2874, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2857-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2857-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Early warning is essential to minimise the impact of flash floods. We explore the use of highly detailed flood models to simulate the 2021 flood event in the lower Ahr valley (Germany). Using very high-resolution models resolving individual streets and buildings, we produce detailed, quantitative, and actionable information for early flood warning systems. Using state-of-the-art computational technology, these models can guarantee very fast forecasts which allow for sufficient time to respond.
Tobias Karl David Weber, Lutz Weihermüller, Attila Nemes, Michel Bechtold, Aurore Degré, Efstathios Diamantopoulos, Simone Fatichi, Vilim Filipović, Surya Gupta, Tobias L. Hohenbrink, Daniel R. Hirmas, Conrad Jackisch, Quirijn de Jong van Lier, John Koestel, Peter Lehmann, Toby R. Marthews, Budiman Minasny, Holger Pagel, Martine van der Ploeg, Shahab Aldin Shojaeezadeh, Simon Fiil Svane, Brigitta Szabó, Harry Vereecken, Anne Verhoef, Michael Young, Yijian Zeng, Yonggen Zhang, and Sara Bonetti
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 3391–3433, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3391-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3391-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Pedotransfer functions (PTFs) are used to predict parameters of models describing the hydraulic properties of soils. The appropriateness of these predictions critically relies on the nature of the datasets for training the PTFs and the physical comprehensiveness of the models. This roadmap paper is addressed to PTF developers and users and critically reflects the utility and future of PTFs. To this end, we present a manifesto aiming at a paradigm shift in PTF research.
Joschka Neumann, Nicolas Brüggemann, Patrick Chaumet, Normen Hermes, Jan Huwer, Peter Kirchner, Werner Lesmeister, Wilhelm August Mertens, Thomas Pütz, Jörg Wolters, Harry Vereecken, and Ghaleb Natour
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1598, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1598, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Climate change in combination with a steadily growing world population and a simultaneous decrease in agricultural land is one of the greatest global challenges facing mankind. In this context, Forschungszentrum Jülich established an "agricultural simulator" (AgraSim), which enables research into the effects of climate change on agricultural ecosystems and the optimization of agricultural cultivation and management strategies with the aid of combined experimental and numerical simulation.
Natalie Hummel, Susanne Buiter, and Zoltán Erdős
Solid Earth, 15, 567–587, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-15-567-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-15-567-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Simulations of subducting tectonic plates often use material properties extrapolated from the behavior of small rock samples in a laboratory to conditions found in the Earth. We explore several typical approaches to simulating these extrapolated material properties and show that they produce very rigid subducting plates with unrealistic dynamics. Our findings imply that subducting plates deform by additional mechanisms that are less commonly implemented in simulations.
Lukas Strebel, Heye Bogena, Harry Vereecken, Mie Andreasen, Sergio Aranda-Barranco, and Harrie-Jan Hendricks Franssen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1001–1026, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1001-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1001-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We present results from using soil water content measurements from 13 European forest sites in a state-of-the-art land surface model. We use data assimilation to perform a combination of observed and modeled soil water content and show the improvements in the representation of soil water content. However, we also look at the impact on evapotranspiration and see no corresponding improvements.
Michael Hillier, Florian Wellmann, Eric A. de Kemp, Boyan Brodaric, Ernst Schetselaar, and Karine Bédard
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 6987–7012, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6987-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6987-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Neural networks can be used effectively to model three-dimensional geological structures from point data, sampling geological interfaces, units, and structural orientations. Existing neural network approaches for this type of modelling are advanced by the efficient incorporation of unconformities, new knowledge inputs, and improved data fitting techniques. These advances permit the modelling of more complex geology in diverse geological settings, different-sized areas, and various data regimes.
Theresa Boas, Heye Reemt Bogena, Dongryeol Ryu, Harry Vereecken, Andrew Western, and Harrie-Jan Hendricks Franssen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 3143–3167, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3143-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3143-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In our study, we tested the utility and skill of a state-of-the-art forecasting product for the prediction of regional crop productivity using a land surface model. Our results illustrate the potential value and skill of combining seasonal forecasts with modelling applications to generate variables of interest for stakeholders, such as annual crop yield for specific cash crops and regions. In addition, this study provides useful insights for future technical model evaluations and improvements.
Zbigniew P. Piotrowski, Jaro Hokkanen, Daniel Caviedes-Voullieme, Olaf Stein, and Stefan Kollet
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1079, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1079, 2023
Preprint withdrawn
Short summary
Short summary
The computer programs capable of simulation of Earth system components evolve, adapting new fundamental science concepts and more observational data on more and more powerful computer hardware. Adaptation of a large scientific program to a new type of hardware is costly. In this work we propose cheap and simple but effective strategy that enable computation using graphic processing units, based on automated program code modification. This results in better resolution and/or longer predictions.
Mohammad Moulaeifard, Simon Bernard, and Florian Wellmann
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 3565–3579, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3565-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3565-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In this work, we propose a flexible framework to generate and interact with geological models using explicit surface representations. The essence of the work lies in the determination of the flexible control mesh, topologically similar to the main geological structure, watertight and controllable with few control points, to manage the geological structures. We exploited the subdivision surface method in our work, which is commonly used in the animation and gaming industry.
Nicolás Molnar and Susanne Buiter
Solid Earth, 14, 213–235, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-14-213-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-14-213-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Progression of orogenic wedges over pre-existing extensional structures is common in nature, but deciphering the spatio-temporal evolution of deformation from the geological record remains challenging. Our laboratory experiments provide insights on how horizontal stresses are transferred across a heterogeneous crust, constrain which pre-shortening conditions can either favour or hinder the reactivatation of extensional structures, and explain what implications they have on critical taper theory.
Daniel Caviedes-Voullième, Mario Morales-Hernández, Matthew R. Norman, and Ilhan Özgen-Xian
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 977–1008, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-977-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-977-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This paper introduces the SERGHEI framework and a solver for shallow-water problems. Such models, often used for surface flow and flood modelling, are computationally intense. In recent years the trends to increase computational power have changed, requiring models to adapt to new hardware and new software paradigms. SERGHEI addresses these challenges, allowing surface flow simulation to be enabled on the newest and upcoming consumer hardware and supercomputers very efficiently.
Frank Zwaan, Guido Schreurs, Susanne J. H. Buiter, Oriol Ferrer, Riccardo Reitano, Michael Rudolf, and Ernst Willingshofer
Solid Earth, 13, 1859–1905, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-13-1859-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-13-1859-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
When a sedimentary basin is subjected to compressional tectonic forces after its formation, it may be inverted. A thorough understanding of such
basin inversionis of great importance for scientific, societal, and economic reasons, and analogue tectonic models form a key part of our efforts to study these processes. We review the advances in the field of basin inversion modelling, showing how the modelling results can be applied, and we identify promising venues for future research.
Cosimo Brogi, Heye Reemt Bogena, Markus Köhli, Johan Alexander Huisman, Harrie-Jan Hendricks Franssen, and Olga Dombrowski
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 11, 451–469, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-11-451-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-11-451-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Accurate monitoring of water in soil can improve irrigation efficiency, which is important considering climate change and the growing world population. Cosmic-ray neutrons sensors (CRNSs) are a promising tool in irrigation monitoring due to a larger sensed area and to lower maintenance than other ground-based sensors. Here, we analyse the feasibility of irrigation monitoring with CRNSs and the impact of the irrigated field dimensions, of the variations of water in soil, and of instrument design.
Michał P. Michalak, Lesław Teper, Florian Wellmann, Jerzy Żaba, Krzysztof Gaidzik, Marcin Kostur, Yuriy P. Maystrenko, and Paulina Leonowicz
Solid Earth, 13, 1697–1720, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-13-1697-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-13-1697-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
When characterizing geological/geophysical surfaces, various geometric attributes are calculated, such as dip angle (1D) or dip direction (2D). However, the boundaries between specific values may be subjective and without optimization significance, resulting from using default color palletes. This study proposes minimizing cosine distance among within-cluster observations to detect 3D anomalies. Our results suggest that the method holds promise for identification of megacylinders or megacones.
Olga Dombrowski, Cosimo Brogi, Harrie-Jan Hendricks Franssen, Damiano Zanotelli, and Heye Bogena
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 5167–5193, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5167-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5167-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Soil carbon storage and food production of fruit orchards will be influenced by climate change. However, they lack representation in models that study such processes. We developed and tested a new sub-model, CLM5-FruitTree, that describes growth, biomass distribution, and management practices in orchards. The model satisfactorily predicted yield and exchange of carbon, energy, and water in an apple orchard and can be used to study land surface processes in fruit orchards at different scales.
Jordan Bates, Francois Jonard, Rajina Bajracharya, Harry Vereecken, and Carsten Montzka
AGILE GIScience Ser., 3, 23, https://doi.org/10.5194/agile-giss-3-23-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/agile-giss-3-23-2022, 2022
Wei Qu, Heye Bogena, Christoph Schüth, Harry Vereecken, Zongmei Li, and Stephan Schulz
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2022-131, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2022-131, 2022
Publication in GMD not foreseen
Short summary
Short summary
We applied the global sensitivity analysis LH-OAT to the integrated hydrology model ParFlow-CLM to investigate the sensitivity of the 12 parameters for different scenarios. And we found that the general patterns of the parameter sensitivities were consistent, however, for some parameters a significantly larger span of the sensitivities was observed, especially for the higher slope and in subarctic climatic scenarios.
Nicholas Jarvis, Jannis Groh, Elisabet Lewan, Katharina H. E. Meurer, Walter Durka, Cornelia Baessler, Thomas Pütz, Elvin Rufullayev, and Harry Vereecken
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 2277–2299, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2277-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2277-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We apply an eco-hydrological model to data on soil water balance and grassland growth obtained at two sites with contrasting climates. Our results show that the grassland in the drier climate had adapted by developing deeper roots, which maintained water supply to the plants in the face of severe drought. Our study emphasizes the importance of considering such plastic responses of plant traits to environmental stress in the modelling of soil water balance and plant growth under climate change.
Susanne J. H. Buiter, Sascha Brune, Derek Keir, and Gwenn Peron-Pinvidic
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-139, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-139, 2022
Preprint archived
Short summary
Short summary
Continental rifts can form when and where continents are stretched. Rifts are characterised by faults, sedimentary basins, earthquakes and/or volcanism. If rifting can continue, a rift may break a continent into conjugate margins such as along the Atlantic and Indian Oceans. In some cases, however, rifting fails, such as in the West African Rift. We discuss continental rifting from inception to break-up, focussing on the processes at play, and illustrate these with several natural examples.
Heye Reemt Bogena, Martin Schrön, Jannis Jakobi, Patrizia Ney, Steffen Zacharias, Mie Andreasen, Roland Baatz, David Boorman, Mustafa Berk Duygu, Miguel Angel Eguibar-Galán, Benjamin Fersch, Till Franke, Josie Geris, María González Sanchis, Yann Kerr, Tobias Korf, Zalalem Mengistu, Arnaud Mialon, Paolo Nasta, Jerzy Nitychoruk, Vassilios Pisinaras, Daniel Rasche, Rafael Rosolem, Hami Said, Paul Schattan, Marek Zreda, Stefan Achleitner, Eduardo Albentosa-Hernández, Zuhal Akyürek, Theresa Blume, Antonio del Campo, Davide Canone, Katya Dimitrova-Petrova, John G. Evans, Stefano Ferraris, Félix Frances, Davide Gisolo, Andreas Güntner, Frank Herrmann, Joost Iwema, Karsten H. Jensen, Harald Kunstmann, Antonio Lidón, Majken Caroline Looms, Sascha Oswald, Andreas Panagopoulos, Amol Patil, Daniel Power, Corinna Rebmann, Nunzio Romano, Lena Scheiffele, Sonia Seneviratne, Georg Weltin, and Harry Vereecken
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 1125–1151, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-1125-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-1125-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Monitoring of increasingly frequent droughts is a prerequisite for climate adaptation strategies. This data paper presents long-term soil moisture measurements recorded by 66 cosmic-ray neutron sensors (CRNS) operated by 24 institutions and distributed across major climate zones in Europe. Data processing followed harmonized protocols and state-of-the-art methods to generate consistent and comparable soil moisture products and to facilitate continental-scale analysis of hydrological extremes.
Lukas Strebel, Heye R. Bogena, Harry Vereecken, and Harrie-Jan Hendricks Franssen
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 395–411, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-395-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-395-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We present the technical coupling between a land surface model (CLM5) and the Parallel Data Assimilation Framework (PDAF). This coupling enables measurement data to update simulated model states and parameters in a statistically optimal way. We demonstrate the viability of the model framework using an application in a forested catchment where the inclusion of soil water measurements significantly improved the simulation quality.
Veronika Forstner, Jannis Groh, Matevz Vremec, Markus Herndl, Harry Vereecken, Horst H. Gerke, Steffen Birk, and Thomas Pütz
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 6087–6106, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-6087-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-6087-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Lysimeter-based manipulative and observational experiments were used to identify responses of water fluxes and aboveground biomass (AGB) to climatic change in permanent grassland. Under energy-limited conditions, elevated temperature actual evapotranspiration (ETa) increased, while seepage, dew, and AGB decreased. Elevated CO2 mitigated the effect on ETa. Under water limitation, elevated temperature resulted in reduced ETa, and AGB was negatively correlated with an increasing aridity.
Denise Degen, Cameron Spooner, Magdalena Scheck-Wenderoth, and Mauro Cacace
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 7133–7153, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7133-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7133-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
In times of worldwide energy transitions, an understanding of the subsurface is increasingly important to provide renewable energy sources such as geothermal energy. To validate our understanding of the subsurface we require data. However, the data are usually not distributed equally and introduce a potential misinterpretation of the subsurface. Therefore, in this study we investigate the influence of measurements on temperature distribution in the European Alps.
Yafei Huang, Jonas Weis, Harry Vereecken, and Harrie-Jan Hendricks Franssen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2021-569, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2021-569, 2021
Manuscript not accepted for further review
Short summary
Short summary
Trends in agricultural droughts cannot be easily deduced from measurements. Here trends in agricultural droughts over 31 German and Dutch sites were calculated with model simulations and long-term observed meteorological data as input. We found that agricultural droughts are increasing although precipitation hardly decreases. The increase is driven by increase in evapotranspiration. The year 2018 was for half of the sites the year with the most extreme agricultural drought in the last 55 years.
Mengna Li, Yijian Zeng, Maciek W. Lubczynski, Jean Roy, Lianyu Yu, Hui Qian, Zhenyu Li, Jie Chen, Lei Han, Han Zheng, Tom Veldkamp, Jeroen M. Schoorl, Harrie-Jan Hendricks Franssen, Kai Hou, Qiying Zhang, Panpan Xu, Fan Li, Kai Lu, Yulin Li, and Zhongbo Su
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 4727–4757, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-4727-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-4727-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The Tibetan Plateau is the source of most of Asia's major rivers and has been called the Asian Water Tower. Due to its remoteness and the harsh environment, there is a lack of field survey data to investigate its hydrogeology. Borehole core lithology analysis, an altitude survey, soil thickness measurement, hydrogeological surveys, and hydrogeophysical surveys were conducted in the Maqu catchment within the Yellow River source region to improve a full–picture understanding of the water cycle.
Hazel Gibson, Sam Illingworth, and Susanne Buiter
Geosci. Commun., 4, 437–451, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-4-437-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-4-437-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
In the spring of 2020, in response to the escalating global COVID-19 Coronavirus pandemic, the European Geosciences Union (EGU) moved its annual General Assembly online in a matter of weeks. This paper explores the feedback provided by participants who attended this experimental conference and identifies four key themes that emerged from analysis of the survey (connection, engagement, environment, and accessibility). The responses raise important questions about the format of future conferences.
Bernd Schalge, Gabriele Baroni, Barbara Haese, Daniel Erdal, Gernot Geppert, Pablo Saavedra, Vincent Haefliger, Harry Vereecken, Sabine Attinger, Harald Kunstmann, Olaf A. Cirpka, Felix Ament, Stefan Kollet, Insa Neuweiler, Harrie-Jan Hendricks Franssen, and Clemens Simmer
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 4437–4464, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-4437-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-4437-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, a 9-year simulation of complete model output of a coupled atmosphere–land-surface–subsurface model on the catchment scale is discussed. We used the Neckar catchment in SW Germany as the basis of this simulation. Since the dataset includes the full model output, it is not only possible to investigate model behavior and interactions between the component models but also use it as a virtual truth for comparison of, for example, data assimilation experiments.
Jan Vanderborght, Valentin Couvreur, Felicien Meunier, Andrea Schnepf, Harry Vereecken, Martin Bouda, and Mathieu Javaux
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 4835–4860, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4835-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4835-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Root water uptake is an important process in the terrestrial water cycle. How this process depends on soil water content, root distributions, and root properties is a soil–root hydraulic problem. We compare different approaches to implementing root hydraulics in macroscopic soil water flow and land surface models.
Alexander Schaaf, Miguel de la Varga, Florian Wellmann, and Clare E. Bond
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 3899–3913, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3899-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3899-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Uncertainty is an inherent property of any model of the subsurface. We show how geological topology information – how different regions of rocks in the subsurface are connected – can be used to train uncertain geological models to reduce uncertainty. More widely, the method demonstrates the use of probabilistic machine learning (Bayesian inference) to train structural geological models on auxiliary geological knowledge that can be encoded in graph structures.
Youri Rothfuss, Maria Quade, Nicolas Brüggemann, Alexander Graf, Harry Vereecken, and Maren Dubbert
Biogeosciences, 18, 3701–3732, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-3701-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-3701-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The partitioning of evapotranspiration into evaporation from soil and transpiration from plants is crucial for a wide range of parties, from farmers to policymakers. In this work, we focus on a particular partitioning method, based on the stable isotopic analysis of water. In particular, we aim at highlighting the challenges that this method is currently facing and, in light of recent methodological developments, propose ways forward for the isotopic-partitioning community.
Cosimo Brogi, Johan A. Huisman, Lutz Weihermüller, Michael Herbst, and Harry Vereecken
SOIL, 7, 125–143, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-7-125-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-7-125-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
There is a need in agriculture for detailed soil maps that carry quantitative information. Geophysics-based soil maps have the potential to deliver such products, but their added value has not been fully investigated yet. In this study, we compare the use of a geophysics-based soil map with the use of two commonly available maps as input for crop growth simulations. The geophysics-based product results in better simulations, with improvements that depend on precipitation, soil, and crop type.
Denise Degen and Mauro Cacace
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 1699–1719, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1699-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1699-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
In this work, we focus on improving the understanding of subsurface processes with respect to interactions with climate dynamics. We present advanced, open-source mathematical methods that enable us to investigate the influence of various model properties on the final outcomes. By relying on our approach, we have been able to showcase their importance in improving our understanding of the subsurface and highlighting the current shortcomings of currently adopted models.
Theresa Boas, Heye Bogena, Thomas Grünwald, Bernard Heinesch, Dongryeol Ryu, Marius Schmidt, Harry Vereecken, Andrew Western, and Harrie-Jan Hendricks Franssen
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 573–601, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-573-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-573-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
In this study we were able to significantly improve CLM5 model performance for European cropland sites by adding a winter wheat representation, specific plant parameterizations for important cash crops, and a cover-cropping and crop rotation subroutine to its crop module. Our modifications should be applied in future studies of CLM5 to improve regional yield predictions and to better understand large-scale impacts of agricultural management on carbon, water, and energy fluxes.
Benjamin Fersch, Till Francke, Maik Heistermann, Martin Schrön, Veronika Döpper, Jannis Jakobi, Gabriele Baroni, Theresa Blume, Heye Bogena, Christian Budach, Tobias Gränzig, Michael Förster, Andreas Güntner, Harrie-Jan Hendricks Franssen, Mandy Kasner, Markus Köhli, Birgit Kleinschmit, Harald Kunstmann, Amol Patil, Daniel Rasche, Lena Scheiffele, Ulrich Schmidt, Sandra Szulc-Seyfried, Jannis Weimar, Steffen Zacharias, Marek Zreda, Bernd Heber, Ralf Kiese, Vladimir Mares, Hannes Mollenhauer, Ingo Völksch, and Sascha Oswald
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 12, 2289–2309, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-2289-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-2289-2020, 2020
Stephanie Thiesen, Diego M. Vieira, Mirko Mälicke, Ralf Loritz, J. Florian Wellmann, and Uwe Ehret
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 4523–4540, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4523-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4523-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
A spatial interpolator has been proposed for exploring the information content of the data in the light of geostatistics and information theory. It showed comparable results to traditional interpolators, with the advantage of presenting generalization properties. We discussed three different ways of combining distributions and their implications for the probabilistic results. By its construction, the method provides a suitable and flexible framework for uncertainty analysis and decision-making.
Cited articles
Abadi, M., Agarwal, A., Barham, P., Brevdo, E., Chen, Z., Citro, C., Corrado, G. S., Davis, A., Dean, J., Devin, M., Ghemawat, S., Goodfellow, I., Harp, A., Irving, G., Isard, M., Jia, Y., Jozefowicz, R., Kaiser, L., Kudlur, M., Levenberg, J., Mané, D., Monga, R., Moore, S., Murray, D., Olah, C., Schuster, M., Shlens, J., Steiner, B., Sutskever, I., Talwar, K., Tucker, P., Vanhoucke, V., Vasudevan, V., Viégas, F., Vinyals, O., Warden, P., Wattenberg, M., Wicke, M., Yu, Y., and Zheng, X.: TensorFlow: Large-Scale Machine Learning on Heterogeneous Systems, https://www.tensorflow.org/ (last access: 24 September 2023), 2015. a
Abdi, D. S., Wilcox, L. C., Warburton, T. C., and Giraldo, F. X.: A GPU-accelerated continuous and discontinuous Galerkin non-hydrostatic atmospheric model, Int. J. High Perform. C., 33, 81–109, https://doi.org/10.1177/1094342017694427, 2017. a
Adams, B., Bohnhoff, W., Dalbey, K., Ebeida, M., Eddy, J., Eldred, M., Hooper, R., Hough, P., Hu, K., Jakeman, J., Khalil, M., Maupin, K., Monschke, J., Ridgway, E., Rushdi, A., Seidl, D., Stephens, J., Swiler, L., and Winokur, J.: DAKOTA, A Multilevel Parallel Object-Oriented Framework for Design Optimization, Parameter Estimation, Uncertainty Quantification, and Sensitivity Analysis: Version 6.12 User's Manual, Sandia National Laboratories, Tech. Rep., SAND2020-12495, 2020. a, b, c
Afanasyev, A., Bianco, M., Mosimann, L., Osuna, C., Thaler, F., Vogt, H., Fuhrer, O., VandeVondele, J., and Schulthess, T. C.: GridTools: A framework for portable weather and climate applications, Software X, 15, 100707, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2021.100707, 2021. a
Alexander, F., Almgren, A., Bell, J., Bhattacharjee, A., Chen, J., Colella, P., Daniel, D., DeSlippe, J., Diachin, L., Draeger, E., Dubey, A., Dunning, T., Evans, T., Foster, I., Francois, M., Germann, T., Gordon, M., Habib, S., Halappanavar, M., Hamilton, S., Hart, W., Huang, Z. H., Hungerford, A., Kasen, D., Kent, P. R. C., Kolev, T., Kothe, D. B., Kronfeld, A., Luo, Y., Mackenzie, P., McCallen, D., Messer, B., Mniszewski, S., Oehmen, C., Perazzo, A., Perez, D., Richards, D., Rider, W. J., Rieben, R., Roche, K., Siegel, A., Sprague, M., Steefel, C., Stevens, R., Syamlal, M., Taylor, M., Turner, J., Vay, J.-L., Voter, A. F., Windus, T. L., and Yelick, K.: Exascale applications: skin in the game, Philos. T. Roy. Soc. A, 378, 20190056, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2019.0056, 2020. a, b
Alexanderian, A.: Optimal experimental design for infinite-dimensional Bayesian inverse problems governed by PDEs: a review, Inverse Problems, 37, 043001, https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6420/abe10c, 2021. a
Alnæs, M., Blechta, J., Hake, J., Johansson, A., Kehlet, B., Logg, A., Richardson, C., Ring, J., Rognes, M. E., and Wells, G. N.: The FEniCS project version 1.5, Archive of Numerical Software, 3, 9–23, https://doi.org/10.11588/ans.2015.100.20553, 2015. a
Al-Rfou, R., Alain, G., Almahairi, A., et al.: Theano: A Python framework for fast computation of mathematical expressions, arXiv [preprint], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1605.02688, 2016. a, b
Antoulas, A. C.: Approximation of Large-Scale Dynamical Systems, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, ISBN 978-0-89871-658-0, eISBN 978-0-89871-871-3, https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9780898718713, 2005. a
Ardabili, S., Mosavi, A., Dehghani, M., and Várkonyi-Kóczy, A. R.: Deep Learning and Machine Learning in Hydrological Processes Climate Change and Earth Systems a Systematic Review, in: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, Springer International Publishing, 52–62, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36841-8_5, 2020. a
Artigues, V., Kormann, K., Rampp, M., and Reuter, K.: Evaluation of performance portability frameworks for the implementation of a particle-in-cell code, Concurrency and Computation Practice and Experience, 32, e5640, https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.5640, 2019. a, b, c
Asante-Duah, D. K.: Hazardous waste risk assessment, CRC Press, https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003070009, 2021. a
Audouze, C., De Vuyst, F., and Nair, P.: Reduced-order modeling of parameterized PDEs using time–space-parameter principal component analysis, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng., 80, 1025–1057, 2009. a
Audouze, C., De Vuyst, F., and Nair, P. B.: Nonintrusive reduced-order modeling of parametrized time-dependent partial differential equations, Numer. Meth. Part. D. E., 29, 1587–1628, 2013. a
Baig, F., Gao, C., Teng, D., Kong, J., and Wang, F.: Accelerating Spatial Cross-Matching on CPU-GPU Hybrid Platform With CUDA and OpenACC, Frontiers in Big Data, 3, 14, https://doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2020.00014, 2020. a, b
Baker, N., Alexander, F., Bremer, T., Hagberg, A., Kevrekidis, Y., Najm, H., Parashar, M., Patra, A., Sethian, J., Wild, S., Willcox, K., and Lee, S.: Workshop Report on Basic Research Needs for Scientific Machine Learning: Core Technologies for Artificial Intelligence, Tech. Rep., 1478744, https://doi.org/10.2172/1478744, 2019. a, b, c, d, e, f, g
Ballarin, F., Sartori, A., and Rozza, G.: RBniCS-reduced order modelling in FEniCS, http://mathlab.sissa.it/rbnics (last access: 23 September 2023), 2017. a
Bandai, T. and Ghezzehei, T. A.: Physics-Informed Neural Networks With Monotonicity Constraints for Richardson-Richards Equation: Estimation of Constitutive Relationships and Soil Water Flux Density From Volumetric Water Content Measurements, Water Resour. Res., 57, e2020WR027642, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020wr027642, 2021. a
Bangerth, W., Dannberg, J., Fraters, M., Gassmoeller, R., Glerum, A., Heister, T., Myhill, R., and Naliboff, J.: ASPECT v2.4.0 (v2.4.0), Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6903424, 2022. a
Barrault, M., Maday, Y., Nguyen, N. C., and Patera, A. T.: An empirical interpolation method: application to efficient reduced-basis discretization of partial differential equations, C. R. Math., 339, 667–672, 2004. a
Bar-Sinai, Y., Hoyer, S., Hickey, J., and Brenner, M. P.: Learning data-driven discretizations for partial differential equations, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 116, 15344–15349, 2019. a
Baş, D. and Boyacı, I. H.: Modeling and optimization I: Usability of response surface methodology, J. Food Eng., 78, 836–845, 2007. a
Beckingsale, D. A., Burmark, J., Hornung, R., Jones, H., Killian, W., Kunen, A. J., Pearce, O., Robinson, P., Ryujin, B. S., and Scogland, T. R.: RAJA: Portable Performance for Large-Scale Scientific Applications, in: 2019 IEEE/ACM International Workshop on Performance, Portability and Productivity in HPC (P3HPC), 71–81, https://doi.org/10.1109/p3hpc49587.2019.00012, 2019. a
Bentivoglio, R., Isufi, E., Jonkman, S. N., and Taormina, R.: Deep Learning Methods for Flood Mapping: A Review of Existing Applications and Future Research Directions, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss. [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2021-614, 2021. a
Bermúdez, M., Ntegeka, V., Wolfs, V., and Willems, P.: Development and Comparison of Two Fast Surrogate Models for Urban Pluvial Flood Simulations, Water Resour. Manage., 32, 2801–2815, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-018-1959-8, 2018. a
Bertagna, L., Deakin, M., Guba, O., Sunderland, D., Bradley, A. M., Tezaur, I. K., Taylor, M. A., and Salinger, A. G.: HOMMEXX 1.0: a performance-portable atmospheric dynamical core for the Energy Exascale Earth System Model, Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 1423–1441, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1423-2019, 2019. a, b
Bertsimas, D. and Tsitsiklis, J. N.: Introduction to linear optimization, vol. 6, Athena Scientific Belmont, MA, 1997. a
Blöschl, G. and Sivapalan, M.: Scale issues in hydrological modelling: A review, Hydrol. Process., 9, 251–290, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.3360090305, 1995. a
Bondyopadhyay, P. K.: Moore's law governs the silicon revolution, P. IEEE, 86, 78–81, 1998. a
Buiter, S. and Ellis, S.: SULEC: Benchmarking a new ALE finite-element code, in: EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts, 7528, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012EGUGA..14.7528B/abstract (last access: 8 December 2023), 2012. a
Busto, S., Stabile, G., Rozza, G., and Vázquez-Cendón, M. E.: POD–Galerkin reduced order methods for combined Navier–Stokes transport equations based on a hybrid FV-FE solver, Comput. Math. Appl., 79, 256–273, 2020. a
Carraro, T., Geiger, M., Rorkel, S., and Rannacher, R.: Multiple Shooting and Time Domain Decomposition Methods, Springer, ISBN 978-3-319-23320-8, 2015. a
Caviedes-Voullième, D., García-Navarro, P., and Murillo, J.: Verification, conservation, stability and efficiency of a finite volume method for the 1D Richards equation, J. Hydrol., 480, 69–84, 2013. a
Caviedes-Voullième, D., Gerhard, N., Sikstel, A., and Müller, S.: Multiwavelet-based mesh adaptivity with Discontinuous Galerkin schemes: Exploring 2D shallow water problems, Adv. Water Resour., 138, 103559, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2020.103559, 2020. a
Chen, J., Hoversten, G. M., Key, K., Nordquist, G., and Cumming, W.: Stochastic inversion of magnetotelluric data using a sharp boundary parameterization and application to a geothermal site, Geophysics, 77, E265–E279, 2012. a
Chen, T., Li, M., Li, Y., Lin, M., Wang, N., Wang, M., Xiao, T., Xu, B., Zhang, C., and Zhang, Z.: MXNet: A flexible and efficient machine learning library for heterogeneous distributed systems, arXiv [preprint], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1512.01274, 2015. a
Chen, W., Hesthaven, J. S., Junqiang, B., Qiu, Y., Yang, Z., and Tihao, Y.: Greedy nonintrusive reduced order model for fluid dynamics, AIAA Journal, 56, 4927–4943, 2018b. a
Chen, X., Duan, J., and Karniadakis, G. E.: Learning and meta-learning of stochastic advection-diffusion-reaction systems from sparse measurements, arXiv [preprint], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1910.09098, 2019. a
Chen, Y., Hesthaven, J. S., Maday, Y., and Rodríguez, J.: Certified reduced basis methods and output bounds for the harmonic Maxwell's equations, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 32, 970–996, 2010. a
Chen, Y., Simon, K., and Behrens, J.: Extending legacy climate models by adaptive mesh refinement for single-component tracer transport: a case study with ECHAM6-HAMMOZ (ECHAM6.3-HAM2.3-MOZ1.0), Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 2289–2316, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-2289-2021, 2021. a
Chollet, F.: Keras, https://keras.io (last access: 23 September 2023), 2015. a
Chuang, P.-Y. and Barba, L. A.: Experience report of physics-informed neural networks in fluid simulations: pitfalls and frustration, arXiv [preprint], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2205.14249, 2022. a, b, c
Clement, V., Ferrachat, S., Fuhrer, O., Lapillonne, X., Osuna, C. E., Pincus, R., Rood, J., and Sawyer, W.: The CLAW DSL, in: PASC '18: Proceedings of the Platform for Advanced Scientific Computing Conference, ACM, Basel Switzerland, 2–4 July 2018, https://doi.org/10.1145/3218176.3218226, 2018. a
Condon, L. E., Kollet, S., Bierkens, M. F., Fogg, G. E., Maxwell, R. M., Hill, M. C., Fransen, H.-J. H., Verhoef, A., Van Loon, A. F., Sulis, M., and Abesser, C.: Global groundwater modeling and monitoring: Opportunities and challenges, Water Resour. Res., 57, e2020WR029500, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR029500, 2021. a
Conway, D., Simpson, J., Didana, Y., Rugari, J., and Heinson, G.: Probabilistic magnetotelluric inversion with adaptive regularisation using the no-U-turns sampler, Pure Appl. Geophys., 175, 2881–2894, 2018. a
Cressie, N.: The origins of kriging, Math. Geol., 22, 239–252, 1990. a
Dauxois, T., Peacock, T., Bauer, P., Caulfield, C. P., Cenedese, C., Gorlé, C., Haller, G., Ivey, G. N., Linden, P. F., Meiburg, E., Pinardi, N., Vriend, N. M., and Woods, A. W.: Confronting Grand Challenges in environmental fluid mechanics, Physical Review Fluids, 6, 020501, https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevfluids.6.020501, 2021. a
Dawson, C., Trahan, C. J., Kubatko, E. J., and Westerink, J. J.: A parallel local timestepping Runge–Kutta discontinuous Galerkin method with applications to coastal ocean modeling, Comput. Method. Appl. M., 259, 154–165, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2013.03.015, 2013. a
Dazzi, S., Vacondio, R., Palù, A. D., and Mignosa, P.: A local time stepping algorithm for GPU-accelerated 2D shallow water models, Adv. Water Resour., 111, 274–288, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2017.11.023, 2018. a
De Bézenac, E., Pajot, A., and Gallinari, P.: Deep learning for physical processes: Incorporating prior scientific knowledge, J. Stat. Mech-Theory E., 2019, 124009, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/ab3195, 2019. a
Degen, D., Veroy, K., and Wellmann, F.: cgre-aachen/DwarfElephant: DwarfElephant 1.0, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4074777, 2020b. a, b
Degen, D., Spooner, C., Scheck-Wenderoth, M., and Cacace, M.: How biased are our models? – a case study of the alpine region, Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 7133–7153, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7133-2021, 2021a. a
Degen, D., Veroy, K., Freymark, J., Scheck-Wenderoth, M., Poulet, T., and Wellmann, F.: Global sensitivity analysis to optimize basin-scale conductive model calibration – A case study from the Upper Rhine Graben, Geothermics, 95, 102143, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2021.102143, 2021b. a, b, c, d
Degen, D., Cacace, M., and Wellmann, F.: 3D multi-physics uncertainty quantification using physics-based machine learning, Scientific Reports, 12, 17491, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-21739-7, 2022a. a, b
Degen, D., Veroy, K., Scheck-Wenderoth, M., and Wellmann, F.: Crustal-scale thermal models: Revisiting the influence of deep boundary conditions, Environ. Earth Sci., 81, 88, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-022-10202-5, 2022b. a, b
Degen, D., Veroy, K., and Wellmann, F.: Uncertainty quantification for basin-scale geothermal conduction models, Scientific Reports, 12, 4246, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-08017-2, 2022c. a, b
Degen, D., Caviedes Voullième, D., Buiter, S., Hendriks Franssen, H.-J., Vereecken, H., González-Nicolás, A., and Wellmann, F.: Non-Intrusive Reduced Basis Code for Geothermal, Geodynamic, and Hydrology Benchmarks, Zenodo [code and data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8369108, 2023. a
Degen, D. M.: Application of the reduced basis method in geophysical simulations: concepts, implementation, advantages, and limitations, PhD thesis, Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen, Aachen, https://doi.org/10.18154/RWTH-2020-12042, 2020. a, b
Dwivedi, V. and Srinivasan, B.: Solution of Biharmonic Equation in Complicated Geometries With Physics Informed Extreme Learning Machine, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng., 20, 061004, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4046892, 2020. a
Edwards, H. C., Trott, C. R., and Sunderland, D.: Kokkos: Enabling manycore performance portability through polymorphic memory access patterns, J. Parallel Distr. Com., 74, 3202–3216, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpdc.2014.07.003, 2014. a
Ellis, S., Little, T., Wallace, L., Hacker, B., and Buiter, S.: Feedback between rifting and diapirism can exhume ultrahigh-pressure rocks, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 311, 427–438, 2011. a
Emmett, M. and Minion, M.: Toward an efficient parallel in time method for partial differential equations, Comm. App. Math. Com. Sc., 7, 105–132, 2012. a
Emmett, M. and Minion, M. L.: Efficient implementation of a multi-level parallel in time algorithm, in: Domain Decomposition Methods in Science and Engineering XXI, Springer, 359–366, ISBN 978-3-319-05788-0, 2014. a
Evans, T. M., Siegel, A., Draeger, E. W., Deslippe, J., Francois, M. M., Germann, T. C., Hart, W. E., and Martin, D. F.: A survey of software implementations used by application codes in the Exascale Computing Project, Int. J. High Perform. C., 36, 109434202110289, https://doi.org/10.1177/10943420211028940, 2021. a
Falkner, S., Klein, A., and Hutter, F.: BOHB: Robust and efficient hyperparameter optimization at scale, in: International Conference on Machine Learning, PMLR, Stockholm, Sweden, 10–15 July 2018, 1437–1446, https://proceedings.mlr.press/v80/falkner18a.html (last access: 22 September 2023), 2018. a, b
Fan, Y., Clark, M., Lawrence, D. M., Swenson, S., Band, L. E., Brantley, S. L., Brooks, P. D., Dietrich, W. E., Flores, A., Grant, G., Kirchner, J. W., Mackay, D. S., McDonnell, J. J., Milly, P. C. D., Sullivan, P. L., Tague, C., Ajami, H., Chaney, N., Hartmann, A., Hazenberg, P., McNamara, J., Pelletier, J., Perket, J., Rouholahnejad-Freund, E., Wagener, T., Zeng, X., Beighley, E., Buzan, J., Huang, M., Livneh, B., Mohanty, B. P., Nijssen, B., Safeeq, M., Shen, C., van Verseveld, W., Volk, J., and Yamazaki, D.: Hillslope Hydrology in Global Change Research and Earth System Modeling, Water Resour. Res., 55, 1737–1772, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018wr023903, 2019. a
Faroughi, S. A., Pawar, N., Fernandes, C., Das, S., Kalantari, N. K., and Mahjour, S. K.: Physics-guided, physics-informed, and physics-encoded neural networks in scientific computing, arXiv [preprint], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2211.07377, 2022. a, b, c
Fisher, M. and Gürol, S.: Parallelization in the time dimension of four-dimensional variational data assimilation, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 143, 1136–1147, 2017. a
Frangos, M., Marzouk, Y., Willcox, K., and van Bloemen Waanders, B.: Surrogate and reduced-order modeling: a comparison of approaches for large-scale statistical inverse problems, Chapt. 7, John Wiley & Sons. Print ISBN 9780470697436, Online ISBN 9780470685853, https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470685853, 2010. a
Frank, D. J., Dennard, R. H., Nowak, E., Solomon, P. M., Taur, Y., and Wong, H.-S. P.: Device scaling limits of Si MOSFETs and their application dependencies, P. IEEE, 89, 259–288, 2001. a
Freymark, J., Bott, J., Cacace, M., Ziegler, M., and Scheck-Wenderoth, M.: Influence of the Main Border Faults on the 3D Hydraulic Field of the Central Upper Rhine Graben, Geofluids, 2019, 7520714 https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7520714, 2019. a
Gan, L., Fu, H., and Yang, G.: Translating novel HPC techniques into efficient geoscience solutions, Journal of Computational Science, 52, 101212, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocs.2020.101212, 2020. a, b
Gassner, G. J. and Winters, A. R.: A Novel Robust Strategy for Discontinuous Galerkin Methods in Computational Fluid Mechanics: Why? When? What? Where?, Frontiers in Physics, 8, 500690, https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2020.500690, 2021. a
Gelet, R., Loret, B., and Khalili, N.: A thermo-hydro-mechanical coupled model in local thermal non-equilibrium for fractured HDR reservoir with double porosity, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 117, B07205, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JB009161, 2012. a, b, c
Geneva, N. and Zabaras, N.: Modeling the dynamics of PDE systems with physics-constrained deep auto-regressive networks, J. Comput. Phys., 403, 109056, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2019.109056, 2020. a
Gerhard, N., Caviedes-Voullième, D., Müller, S., and Kesserwani, G.: Multiwavelet-Based Grid Adaptation with Discontinuous Galerkin Schemes for Shallow Water Equations, J. Comput. Phys., 301, 265–288, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2015.08.030, 2015. a
Germann, T. C.: Co-design in the Exascale Computing Project, Int. J. High Perform. C., 35, 503–507, https://doi.org/10.1177/10943420211059380, 2021. a
Götz, M., Debus, C., Coquelin, D., Krajsek, K., Comito, C., Knechtges, P., Hagemeier, B., Tarnawa, M., Hanselmann, S., Siggel, M., Basermann, A., and Streit, A.: HeAT – a Distributed and GPU-accelerated Tensor Framework for Data Analytics, in: Proceedings of the 19th IEEE International Conference on Big Data, IEEE, Atlanta, USA, 10–13 December 2020, 276–288, https://doi.org/10.1109/BigData50022.2020.9378050, 2020. a
Grepl, M.: Reduced-basis Approximation and A Posteriori Error Estimation for Parabolic Partial Differential Equations, PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/32387 (last access: 24 September 2023), 2005. a
Grete, P., Glines, F. W., and O′Shea, B. W.: K-Athena: A Performance Portable Structured Grid Finite Volume Magnetohydrodynamics Code, IEEE T. Parall. Distr., 32, 85–97, https://doi.org/10.1109/tpds.2020.3010016, 2021. a, b
Haghighat, E. and Juanes, R.: SciANN: A Keras/TensorFlow wrapper for scientific computations and physics-informed deep learning using artificial neural networks, Comput. Method. Appl. M., 373, 113552, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2020.113552, 2021. a
Hammerschmidt, M., Herrmann, S., Pomplun, J., Zschiedrich, L., Burger, S., and Schmidt, F.: Reduced basis method for Maxwell's equations with resonance phenomena, in: Optical Systems Design 2015: Computational Optics, SPIE, vol. 9630, 138–151, https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2190425, 2015. a
Hamon, F. P., Schreiber, M., and Minion, M. L.: Parallel-in-time multi-level integration of the shallow-water equations on the rotating sphere, J. Comput. Phys., 407, 109210, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2019.109210, 2020. a, b
He, Q., Barajas-Solano, D., Tartakovsky, G., and Tartakovsky, A. M.: Physics-informed neural networks for multiphysics data assimilation with application to subsurface transport, Adv. Water Resour., 141, 103610, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2020.103610, 2020. a
Herman, J. and Usher, W.: SALib: An open-source Python library for Sensitivity Analysis, J. Open Source Softw., 2, 97, https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00097, 2017. a, b
Hess, M. W. and Benner, P.: Fast evaluation of time–harmonic Maxwell's equations using the reduced basis method, IEEE T. Microw. Theory, 61, 2265–2274, 2013a. a
Hess, M. W. and Benner, P.: Reduced basis generation for maxwell’s equations by rigorous error estimation, in: 19th International Conference on the Computation of Electromagnetic Fields (COMPUMAG 2013), Budapest, Hungary, 30 June–4 July 2013, PD2–10, https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2014.2299393, 2013b. a
Hess, M. W., Grundel, S., and Benner, P.: Estimating the inf-sup constant in reduced basis methods for time-harmonic Maxwell’s equations, IEEE T. Microw. Theory, 63, 3549–3557, 2015. a
Hokkanen, J., Kollet, S., Kraus, J., Herten, A., Hrywniak, M., and Pleiter, D.: Leveraging HPC accelerator architectures with modern techniques – hydrologic modeling on GPUs with ParFlow, Computat. Geosci., 25, 1579–1590, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-021-10051-4, 2021. a, b, c
Huang, P.: Investigating different formulations for hydrothermal convection in geothermal systems, in: Proceedings World Geothermal Congress 2020 Reykjavik, Iceland, 26 April–2 May 2020 https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Po_Wei_Huang4/publication/ (last access: 20 September 2023), 2018. a
Iglesias, M. and Stuart, A. M.: Inverse Problems and Uncertainty Quantification, SIAM News, 2–3, https://homepages.warwick.ac.uk/~masdr/BOOKCHAPTERS/stuart19c.pdf (last access: 21 September 2023), 2014. a
Jacquey, A. and Cacace, M.: Modelling fully-coupled Thermo-Hydro-Mechanical (THM) processes in fractured reservoirs using GOLEM: a massively parallel open-source simulator, in: EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts, Vienna, Austria, April 2017, vol. 19, 15721, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017EGUGA..1915721J/abstract (last access: 22 September 2023), 2017. a, b
Jacquey, A. B. and Cacace, M.: Multiphysics modeling of a brittle-ductile lithosphere: 2. Semi-brittle, semi-ductile deformation and damage rheology, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 125, e2019JB018475, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JB018475, 2020a. a, b
Jacquey, A. B. and Cacace, M.: Multiphysics Modeling of a Brittle-Ductile Lithosphere: 1. Explicit Visco-Elasto-Plastic Formulation and Its Numerical Implementation, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 125, e2019JB018474, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JB018474, 2020b. a, b, c
Jagtap, A. D. and Karniadakis, G. E.: Extended Physics-Informed Neural Networks (XPINNs): A Generalized Space-Time Domain Decomposition Based Deep Learning Framework for Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations, Commun. Comput. Phys., 28, 2002–2041, 2020. a
Jiang, S., Zheng, Y., and Solomatine, D.: Improving AI System Awareness of Geoscience Knowledge: Symbiotic Integration of Physical Approaches and Deep Learning, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2020GL088229, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020gl088229, 2020. a, b
Jones, A. G., Afonso, J. C., and Fullea, J.: Geochemical and geophysical constrains on the dynamic topography of the Southern African Plateau, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 18, 3556–3575, 2017. a
Jordan, M. I. and Mitchell, T. M.: Machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects, Science, 349, 255–260, 2015. a
Jung, N.: Error Estimation for Parametric Model Order Reduction and Its Application (Doctoral dissertation, Technische Universität München), https://mediatum.ub.tum.de/?id=1080163 (last access: 18 September 2023), 2012. a
Karumuri, S., Tripathy, R., Bilionis, I., and Panchal, J.: Simulator-free solution of high-dimensional stochastic elliptic partial differential equations using deep neural networks, J. Comput. Phys., 404, 109120, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2019.109120, 2020. a
Kevlahan, N. K.-R.: Adaptive Wavelet Methods for Earth Systems Modelling, Fluids, 6, 236, https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids6070236, 2021. a
Koltzer, N., Scheck-Wenderoth, M., Bott, J., Cacace, M., Frick, M., Sass, I., Fritsche, J.-G., and Bär, K.: The Effects of Regional Fluid Flow on Deep Temperatures (Hesse, Germany), Energies, 12, 2081, https://doi.org/10.3390/en12112081, 2019. a
Kotsiantis, S. B., Zaharakis, I., and Pintelas, P.: Supervised machine learning: A review of classification techniques, Emerging artificial intelligence applications in computer engineering, 160, 3–24, 2007. a
Kuffour, B. N. O., Engdahl, N. B., Woodward, C. S., Condon, L. E., Kollet, S., and Maxwell, R. M.: Simulating coupled surface–subsurface flows with ParFlow v3.5.0: capabilities, applications, and ongoing development of an open-source, massively parallel, integrated hydrologic model, Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 1373–1397, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1373-2020, 2020. a
Kumar, P., Debele, S. E., Sahani, J., Rawat, N., Marti-Cardona, B., Alfieri, S. M., Basu, B., Basu, A. S., Bowyer, P., Charizopoulos, N., Jaakko, J., Loupis, M., Menenti, M., Mickovski, S. B., Pfeiffer, J., Pilla, F., Pröll, J., Pulvirenti, B., Rutzinger, M., Sannigrahi, S., Spyrou, C., Tuomenvirta, H., Vojinovic, Z., and Zieher, T.: An overview of monitoring methods for assessing the performance of nature-based solutions against natural hazards, Earth-Sci. Rev., 217, 103603, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103603, 2021. a, b
Kärnä, T., Kramer, S. C., Mitchell, L., Ham, D. A., Piggott, M. D., and Baptista, A. M.: Thetis coastal ocean model: discontinuous Galerkin discretization for the three-dimensional hydrostatic equations, Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 4359–4382, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4359-2018, 2018. a
Käser, M. and Dumbser, M.: An arbitrary high-order discontinuous Galerkin method for elastic waves on unstructured meshes – I. The two-dimensional isotropic case with external source terms, Geophys. J. Int., 166, 855–877, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246x.2006.03051.x, 2006. a
Lawrence, B. N., Rezny, M., Budich, R., Bauer, P., Behrens, J., Carter, M., Deconinck, W., Ford, R., Maynard, C., Mullerworth, S., Osuna, C., Porter, A., Serradell, K., Valcke, S., Wedi, N., and Wilson, S.: Crossing the chasm: how to develop weather and climate models for next generation computers?, Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 1799–1821, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1799-2018, 2018. a, b, c
Li, Z., Kovachki, N., Azizzadenesheli, K., Liu, B., Bhattacharya, K., Stuart, A., and Anandkumar, A.: Fourier neural operator for parametric partial differential equations, arXiv [preprint], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2010.08895, 2020. a, b, c, d
Liang, J., Li, W., Bradford, S., and Šimůnek, J.: Physics-Informed Data-Driven Models to Predict Surface Runoff Water Quantity and Quality in Agricultural Fields, Water, 11, 200, https://doi.org/10.3390/w11020200, 2019. a
Liu, W. and Ramirez, A.: State of the art review of the environmental assessment and risks of underground geo-energy resources exploitation, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., 76, 628–644, 2017. a
Lu, L., Meng, X., Mao, Z., and Karniadakis, G. E.: DeepXDE: A deep learning library for solving differential equations, arXiv [preprint], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1907.04502, 2019. a
Lu, L., Meng, X., Cai, S., Mao, Z., Goswami, S., Zhang, Z., and Karniadakis, G. E.: A comprehensive and fair comparison of two neural operators (with practical extensions) based on fair data, Comput. Method. Appl. M., 393, 114778, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2022.114778, 2022. a, b
Mahesh, B.: Machine learning algorithms – a review, International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 9, 381–386, 2020. a
Mainini, L. and Willcox, K.: Surrogate modeling approach to support real-time structural assessment and decision making, AIAA Journal, 53, 1612–1626, 2015. a
Malek, A. and Beidokhti, R. S.: Numerical solution for high order differential equations using a hybrid neural network–optimization method, Appl. Math. Comput., 183, 260–271, 2006. a
Maxwell, R. M., Condon, L. E., and Melchior, P.: A Physics-Informed, Machine Learning Emulator of a 2D Surface Water Model: What Temporal Networks and Simulation-Based Inference Can Help Us Learn about Hydrologic Processes, Water, 13, 3633, https://doi.org/10.3390/w13243633, 2021. a
Meng, X. and Karniadakis, G. E.: A composite neural network that learns from multi-fidelity data: Application to function approximation and inverse PDE problems, J. Comput. Phys., 401, 109020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2019.109020, 2020. a
Meng, X., Li, Z., Zhang, D., and Karniadakis, G. E.: PPINN: Parareal physics-informed neural network for time-dependent PDEs, Comput. Method. Appl. M., 370, 113250, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2020.113250, 2020. a, b, c, d
Miao, T., Lu, W., Lin, J., Guo, J., and Liu, T.: Modeling and uncertainty analysis of seawater intrusion in coastal aquifers using a surrogate model: a case study in Longkou, China, Arab. J. Geosci., 12, 1, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-018-4128-8, 2019. a, b
Mohammadi, B.: A review on the applications of machine learning for runoff modeling, Sustainable Water Resources Management, 7, 98, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-021-00584-y, 2021. a
Morales-Hernández, M., Sharif, M. B., Gangrade, S., Dullo, T. T., Kao, S.-C., Kalyanapu, A., Ghafoor, S. K., Evans, K. J., Madadi-Kandjani, E., and Hodges, B. R.: High-performance computing in water resources hydrodynamics, J. Hydroinform., 22, 1217–1235, https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2020.163, 2020. a
Myers, R. H., Montgomery, D. C., and Anderson-Cook, C. M.: Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments, John Wiley & Sons, ISBN 978-1-118-91601-8, 2016. a
Naliboff, J. B., Buiter, S. J., Péron-Pinvidic, G., Osmundsen, P. T., and Tetreault, J.: Complex fault interaction controls continental rifting, Nat. Commun., 8, 1179, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-00904-x, 2017. a
Nearing, G. S., Kratzert, F., Sampson, A. K., Pelissier, C. S., Klotz, D., Frame, J. M., Prieto, C., and Gupta, H. V.: What Role Does Hydrological Science Play in the Age of Machine Learning?, Water Resour. Res., 57, e2020WR028091, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020wr028091, 2021. a, b
Nield, D. A. and Bejan, A.: Heat Transfer Through a Porous Medium, in: Convection in Porous Media, 37–55, Springer, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5541-7, 2017. a, b, c, d
Ortega-Gelabert, O., Zlotnik, S., Afonso, J. C., and Díez, P.: Fast stokes flow simulations for geophysical-geodynamic inverse problems and sensitivity analyses based on reduced order modeling, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 125, e2019JB018314, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JB018314, 2020. a
Özgen-Xian, I., Kesserwani, G., Caviedes-Voullième, D., Molins, S., Xu, Z., Dwivedi, D., Moulton, J. D., and Steefel, C. I.: Wavelet-based local mesh refinement for rainfall–runoff simulations, J. Hydroinform., 22, 1059–1077, https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2020.198, 2020. a
Pang, G., D'Elia, M., Parks, M., and Karniadakis, G. E.: nPINNs: nonlocal Physics-Informed Neural Networks for a parametrized nonlocal universal Laplacian operator. Algorithms and Applications, J. Comput. Phys., 422, 109760, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2020.109760, 2020. a, b
Paniconi, C. and Putti, M.: Physically based modeling in catchment hydrology at 50: Survey and outlook, Water Resour. Res., 51, 7090–7129, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017780, 2015. a
Paszke, A., Gross, S., Massa, F., Lerer, A., Bradbury, J., Chanan, G., Killeen, T., Lin, Z., Gimelshein, N., Antiga, L., Desmaison, A., Kopf, A., Yang, E., DeVito, Z., Raison, M., Tejani, A., Chilamkurthy, S., Steiner, B., Fang, L., Bai, J., and Chintala, S.: PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library, in: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 32, edited by: Wallach, H., Larochelle, H., Beygelzimer, A., d'Alché-Buc, F., Fox, E., and Garnett, R., Curran Associates, Inc., 8024–8035, http://papers.neurips.cc/paper/9015-pytorch-an-imperative-style-high-performance-deep-learning-library.pdf (last access: 24 September 2023), 2019. a
Patil, A., Huard, D., and Fonnesbeck, C. J.: PyMC: Bayesian Stochastic Modelling in Python, J. Stat. Softw., 35, 1–81, https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v035.i04, 2010. a, b
Peherstorfer, B. and Willcox, K.: Data-driven operator inference for nonintrusive projection-based model reduction, Comput. Method. Appl. M., 306, 196–215, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2016.03.025, 2016. a, b, c, d
Peherstorfer, B., Willcox, K., and Gunzburger, M.: Survey of multifidelity methods in uncertainty propagation, inference, and optimization, SIAM Rev., 60, 550–591, 2018. a
Pelletier, D., Fortin, A., and Camarero, R.: Are FEM solutions of incompressible flows really incompressible?(or how simple flows can cause headaches!), Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fl., 9, 99–112, 1989. a
Peng, W., Zhou, W., Zhang, J., and Yao, W.: Accelerating physics-informed neural network training with prior dictionaries, arXiv [preprint], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2004.08151, 2020. a
Permann, C. J., Gaston, D. R., Andrš, D., Carlsen, R. W., Kong, F., Lindsay, A. D., Miller, J. M., Peterson, J. W., Slaughter, A. E., Stogner, R. H., and Martineau, R. C.: MOOSE: Enabling massively parallel multiphysics simulation, SoftwareX, 11, 100430, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2020.100430, 2020. a, b, c
Piggott, M., Pain, C., Gorman, G., Power, P., and Goddard, A.: h, r, and hr adaptivity with applications in numerical ocean modelling, Ocean Model., 10, 95–113, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2004.07.007, 2005. a
Poulet, T., Veveakis, M., Paesold, M., and Regenauer-Lieb, K.: REDBACK: An open-source highly scalable simulation tool for rock mechanics with dissipative feedbacks, in: AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts, San Francisco, USA, 13–15 December 2014, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014AGUFM.H21M..02P/abstract (last access: 17 September 2023), 2014. a, b
Qian, E., Grepl, M., Veroy, K., and Willcox, K.: A certified trust region reduced basis approach to PDE-constrained optimization, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 39, S434–S460, 2017. a
Rabiti, C., Alfonsi, A., Cogliati, J., Mandelli, D., Kinoshita, R., Sen, S., Wang, C., Talbot, P. W., Maljovec, D. P., and Chen, J.: RAVEN user manual, Tech. Rep., Idaho National Lab.(INL), Idaho Falls, ID (United States), https://doi.org/10.2172/1784874, 2020. a, b, c
Raissi, M. and Karniadakis, G. E.: Hidden physics models: Machine learning of nonlinear partial differential equations, J. Comput. Phys., 357, 125–141, 2018. a
Raissi, M., Perdikaris, P., and Karniadakis, G. E.: Numerical Gaussian processes for time-dependent and non-linear partial differential equations, arXiv [preprint], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1703.10230, 2017. a
Rannabauer, L., Dumbser, M., and Bader, M.: ADER-DG with a-posteriori finite-volume limiting to simulate tsunamis in a parallel adaptive mesh refinement framework, Comput. Fluids, 173, 299–306, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2018.01.031, 2018. a
Rao, C., Sun, H., and Liu, Y.: Hard encoding of physics for learning spatiotemporal dynamics, arXiv [preprint], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2105.00557, 2021. a, b, c
Rathgeber, F., Ham, D. A., Mitchell, L., Lange, M., Luporini, F., McRae, A. T., Bercea, G.-T., Markall, G. R., and Kelly, P. H.: Firedrake: automating the finite element method by composing abstractions, ACM T. Math. Software, 43, 1–27, https://doi.org/10.1145/2998441, 2016. a
Razavi, S., Tolson, B. A., and Burn, D. H.: Review of surrogate modeling in water resources, Water Resour. Res., 48, 7, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR011527, 2012. a
Regenauer-Lieb, K., Veveakis, M., Poulet, T., Wellmann, F., Karrech, A., Liu, J., Hauser, J., Schrank, C., Gaede, O., and Trefry, M.: Multiscale coupling and multiphysics approaches in earth sciences: Theory, Journal of Coupled Systems and Multiscale Dynamics, 1, 49–73, 2013. a
Richards, L. A.: Capillary conduction of liquids through porous mediums, Physics, 1, 318–333, 1931. a
Rizzo, C. B., de Barros, F. P., Perotto, S., Oldani, L., and Guadagnini, A.: Adaptive POD model reduction for solute transport in heterogeneous porous media, Comput. Geosci., 22, 297–308, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-017-9693-5, 2017. a, b
Rochlitz, R., Skibbe, N., and Günther, T.: custEM: Customizable finite-element simulation of complex controlled-source electromagnetic data, Geophysics, 84, F17–F33, https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2018-0208.1, 2019. a
Rogelj, J. and Knutti, R.: Geosciences after Paris, Nat. Geosci., 9, 187–189, 2016. a
Rosas-Carbajal, M., Linde, N., Kalscheuer, T., and Vrugt, J. A.: Two-dimensional probabilistic inversion of plane-wave electromagnetic data: methodology, model constraints and joint inversion with electrical resistivity data, Geophys. J. Int., 196, 1508–1524, 2014. a
Sabeena, J. and Reddy, P. V. S.: A Review of Weather forecasting schemes, i-manager's Journal on Pattern Recognition, 4, 27–30, https://doi.org/10.26634/jpr.4.2.13731, 2017. a, b
Santoso, R., Degen, D., Cacace, M., and Wellmann, F.: State-of-the-art physics-based machine learning for hydro-mechanical simulation in geothermal applications, European Geothermal Congress, Berlin, Germany, 17–21 October 2022, 1–10, https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ryan-Santoso-2/publication/ (last access: 10 September 2023), 2022. a
Schaa, R., Gross, L., and du Plessis, J.: PDE-based geophysical modelling using finite elements: examples from 3D resistivity and 2D magnetotellurics, J. Geophys. Eng., 13, S59–S73, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-2132/13/2/S59, 2016. a
Schenk, O. and Gärtner, K.: Solving unsymmetric sparse systems of linear equations with PARDISO, Future Gener. Comp. Sy., 20, 475–487, 2004. a
Shah, V., Joshi, A., Ghosal, S., Pokuri, B., Sarkar, S., Ganapathysubramanian, B., and Hegde, C.: Encoding invariances in deep generative models, arXiv [preprint], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1906.01626, 2019. a
Sharma, R., Farimani, A. B., Gomes, J., Eastman, P., and Pande, V.: Weakly-supervised deep learning of heat transport via physics informed loss, arXiv [preprint], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1807.11374, 2018. a
Shen, C., Chen, X., and Laloy, E.: Editorial: Broadening the Use of Machine Learning in Hydrology, Frontiers in Water, 3, 681023, https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2021.681023, 2021. a
Sit, M., Demiray, B. Z., Xiang, Z., Ewing, G. J., Sermet, Y., and Demir, I.: A comprehensive review of deep learning applications in hydrology and water resources, Water Sci. Technol., 82, 2635–2670, https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2020.369, 2020. a, b
Smith, S., reedmaxwell, i-ferguson, Engdahl, N., FabianGasper, Avery, P., Chennault, C., Jourdain, S., grapp1, Condon, L., Kulkarni, K., Bansal, V., xy124, Bennett, A., basileh, Thompson, D., DrewLazzeriKitware, Swilley, J., Beisman, J., Beisman, J., alanquits, Coon, E., Bertolacci, I. M. S., Lührs, L., arezaii, aureliayang and cswoodward: parflow/parflow: ParFlow Version 3.10.0 (v3.10.0), Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6413322, 2022. a
Song, X., Zhang, J., Zhan, C., Xuan, Y., Ye, M., and Xu, C.: Global sensitivity analysis in hydrological modeling: Review of concepts, methods, theoretical framework, and applications, J. Hydrol., 523, 739–757, 2015. a
Stefansson, I., Berre, I., and Keilegavlen, E.: A fully coupled numerical model of thermo-hydro-mechanical processes and fracture contact mechanics in porous media, arXiv [preprint], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2008.06289, 2020. a, b
Stewart, I. S. and Lewis, D.: Communicating contested geoscience to the public: Moving from “matters of fact” to “matters of concern”, Earth-Sci. Rev., 174, 122–133, 2017. a
Taron, J., Elsworth, D., and Min, K.-B.: Numerical simulation of thermal-hydrologic-mechanical-chemical processes in deformable, fractured porous media, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min., 46, 842–854, 2009. a
Tartakovsky, A. M., Marrero, C. O., Perdikaris, P., Tartakovsky, G. D., and Barajas-Solano, D.: Physics-Informed Deep Neural Networks for Learning Parameters and Constitutive Relationships in Subsurface Flow Problems, Water Resour. Res., 56, e2019WR026731, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019wr026731, 2020. a
Tran, H., Leonarduzzi, E., la Fuente, L. D., Hull, R. B., Bansal, V., Chennault, C., Gentine, P., Melchior, P., Condon, L. E., and Maxwell, R. M.: Development of a Deep Learning Emulator for a Distributed Groundwater–Surface Water Model: ParFlow-ML, Water, 13, 3393, https://doi.org/10.3390/w13233393, 2021. a
Trott, C., Berger-Vergiat, L., Poliakoff, D., Rajamanickam, S., Lebrun-Grandie, D., Madsen, J., Awar, N. A., Gligoric, M., Shipman, G., and Womeldorff, G.: The Kokkos EcoSystem: Comprehensive Performance Portability for High Performance Computing, Comput. Sci. Eng., 23, 10–18, https://doi.org/10.1109/mcse.2021.3098509, 2021. a
Vallier, B., Magnenet, V., Schmittbuhl, J., and Fond, C.: THM modeling of hydrothermal circulation at Rittershoffen geothermal site, France, Geothermal Energy, 6, 22, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40517-018-0108-1, 2018. a
van Genuchten, M.: A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 44, 892–898, 1980. a
Vermeulen, P. and Heemink, A.: Model-reduced variational data assimilation, Mon. Weather Rev., 134, 2888–2899, 2006. a
Vermeulen, P., Heemink, A. W., and Te Stroet, C. B.: Reduced models for linear groundwater flow models using empirical orthogonal functions, Adv. Water Resour., 27, 57–69, 2004. a
Veroy, K., Prud'homme, C., Rovas, D. V., and Patera, A. T.: A Posteriori Error Bounds for Reduced-Basis Approximation of Parametrized Noncoercive and Nonlinear Elliptic Partial Differential Equations, in: Proceedings of the 16th AIAA computational fluid dynamics conference, Orlando, FL, 23–26 June 2003, vol. 3847, https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2003-3847, 2003. a, b
Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., Haberland, M., Reddy, T., Cournapeau, D., Burovski, E., Peterson, P., Weckesser, W., Bright, J., van der Walt, S. J., Brett, M., Wilson, J., Millman, K. J., Mayorov, N., Nelson, A. R. J., Jones, E., Kern, R., Larson, E., Carey, C. J., Polat, İ., Feng, Y., Moore, E. W., VanderPlas, J., Laxalde, D., Perktold, J., Cimrman, R., Henriksen, I., Quintero, E. A., Harris, C. R., Archibald, A. M., Ribeiro, A. H., Pedregosa, F., van Mulbregt, P., and SciPy 1.0 Contributors: SciPy 1.0: Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python, Nat. Methods, 17, 261–272, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2, 2020. a, b
Volkwein, S.: Model reduction using proper orthogonal decomposition, Lecture Notes, Institute of Mathematics and Scientific Computing, University of Graz, https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=c8022ab24391f734cba5b41539f651e327c87b48 (last access: 22 September 2023), 2011. a, b
Wang, S., Yu, X., and Perdikaris, P.: When and why PINNs fail to train: A neural tangent kernel perspective, J. Comput. Phys., 449, 110768, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2021.110768, 2022. a
Wellmann, J. F. and Reid, L. B.: Basin-scale geothermal model calibration: Experience from the Perth Basin, Australia, Energy Proced., 59, 382–389, 2014. a
Willard, J., Jia, X., Xu, S., Steinbach, M., and Kumar, V.: Integrating physics-based modeling with machine learning: A survey, arXiv [preprint], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2003.04919, 2020. a, b, c, d
Wirtz, D., Karajan, N., and Haasdonk, B.: Surrogate modeling of multiscale models using kernel methods, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng., 101, 1–28, https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.4767, 2015. a
Wu, J.-L., Kashinath, K., Albert, A., Chirila, D., Xiao, H., and Prabhat: Enforcing statistical constraints in generative adversarial networks for modeling chaotic dynamical systems, J. Comput. Phys., 406, 109209, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2019.109209, 2020. a
Yang, L., Zhang, D., and Karniadakis, G. E.: Physics-informed generative adversarial networks for stochastic differential equations, arXiv [preprint], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1811.02033, 2018. a
Yang, L., Meng, X., and Karniadakis, G. E.: B-PINNs: Bayesian physics-informed neural networks for forward and inverse PDE problems with noisy data, J. Comput. Phys., 425, 109913, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2020.109913, 2020. a, b
Yang, Y. and Perdikaris, P.: Physics-informed deep generative models, arXiv [preprint], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1812.03511, 2018. a
Young, C.-C., Liu, W.-C., and Wu, M.-C.: A physically based and machine learning hybrid approach for accurate rainfall-runoff modeling during extreme typhoon events, Appl. Soft Comput., 53, 205–216, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2016.12.052, 2017. a, b
Yu, M., Yang, C., and Li, Y.: Big data in natural disaster management: a review, Geosciences, 8, 165, https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8050165, 2018. a, b
Zahura, F. T., Goodall, J. L., Sadler, J. M., Shen, Y., Morsy, M. M., and Behl, M.: Training Machine Learning Surrogate Models From a High-Fidelity Physics-Based Model: Application for Real-Time Street-Scale Flood Prediction in an Urban Coastal Community, Water Resour. Res., 56, e2019WR027038, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019wr027038, 2020. a
Zanchetta, A. D. L. and Coulibaly, P.: Hybrid Surrogate Model for Timely Prediction of Flash Flood Inundation Maps Caused by Rapid River Overflow, Forecasting, 4, 126–148, https://doi.org/10.3390/forecast4010007, 2022. a
Zenker, E., Worpitz, B., Widera, R., Huebl, A., Juckeland, G., Knüpfer, A., Nagel, W. E., and Bussmann, M.: Alpaka – An Abstraction Library for Parallel Kernel Acceleration, IEEE Computer Society, Chicago, USA, 23–27 May 2016, https://doi.org/10.1109/IPDPSW.2016.50, 2016. a
Zhang, E., Dao, M., Karniadakis, G. E., and Suresh, S.: Analyses of internal structures and defects in materials using physics-informed neural networks, Science Advances, 8, eabk0644, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abk0644, 2022. a
Zhu, Y., Zabaras, N., Koutsourelakis, P.-S., and Perdikaris, P.: Physics-constrained deep learning for high-dimensional surrogate modeling and uncertainty quantification without labeled data, J. Comput. Phys., 394, 56–81, 2019. a
Zounemat-Kermnai, M., Batelaan, O., Fadaee, M., and Hinkelmann, R.: Ensemble Machine Learning Paradigms in Hydrology: A Review, J. Hydrol., 598, 126266, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126266, 2021. a
Executive editor
This manuscript provides a review of physics-based machine learning methods, and provides a perspective on their use.
This manuscript provides a review of physics-based machine learning methods, and provides a...
Short summary
In geosciences, we often use simulations based on physical laws. These simulations can be computationally expensive, which is a problem if simulations must be performed many times (e.g., to add error bounds). We show how a novel machine learning method helps to reduce simulation time. In comparison to other approaches, which typically only look at the output of a simulation, the method considers physical laws in the simulation itself. The method provides reliable results faster than standard.
In geosciences, we often use simulations based on physical laws. These simulations can be...
