Articles | Volume 16, issue 24 
            
                
                    
            
            
            https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-7375-2023
                    © Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under 
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
                the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-7375-2023
                    © Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under 
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
                the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Perspectives of physics-based machine learning strategies for geoscientific applications governed by partial differential equations
Denise Degen
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
                                            
                                    
                                            Computational Geoscience, Geothermics and Reservoir Geophysics (CG3), RWTH Aachen University, Mathieustraße 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany
                                        
                                    Daniel Caviedes Voullième
                                            Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich Supercomputing Centre (JSC), Simulation and Data Lab. Terrestrial Systems, Wilhelm-Johnen-Straße, 52425 Jülich, Germany
                                        
                                    
                                            Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Agrosphere, IBG-3,  Wilhelm-Johnen-Straße, 52425 Jülich, Germany
                                        
                                    Susanne Buiter
                                            RWTH Aachen University, Tectonics and Geodyamics (TAG), Lochnerstraße 4-20, 52064 Aachen, Germany
                                        
                                    
                                            Helmholtz Centre Potsdam – GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences,  Telegrafenberg, 14473 Potsdam, Germany
                                        
                                    Harrie-Jan Hendricks Franssen
                                            Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Agrosphere, IBG-3,  Wilhelm-Johnen-Straße, 52425 Jülich, Germany
                                        
                                    
                                            Centre for High-Performance Computing Terrestrial Systems, Geoverbund ABC/J, Wilhelm-Johnen-Straße, 52425 Jülich, Germany
                                        
                                    Harry Vereecken
                                            Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Agrosphere, IBG-3,  Wilhelm-Johnen-Straße, 52425 Jülich, Germany
                                        
                                    
                                            Centre for High-Performance Computing Terrestrial Systems, Geoverbund ABC/J, Wilhelm-Johnen-Straße, 52425 Jülich, Germany
                                        
                                    Ana González-Nicolás
                                            Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich Supercomputing Centre (JSC), Simulation and Data Lab. Terrestrial Systems, Wilhelm-Johnen-Straße, 52425 Jülich, Germany
                                        
                                    Florian Wellmann
                                            Computational Geoscience, Geothermics and Reservoir Geophysics (CG3), RWTH Aachen University, Mathieustraße 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany
                                        
                                    
                                            Fraunhofer Research Institution for Energy Infrastructures and Geothermal Systems (IEG), Am Hochschulcampus 1, 44801 Bochum, Germany
                                        
                                    Viewed
                        
                            Total article views: 5,929 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
                        
                            
                                
                                
                            
                                
                                
                            
                        
                        
                            Cumulative views and downloads 
                                         (calculated since 27 Mar 2023)
                        
                        
                            
                                
                            
                    
        
                    
                    | HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4,477 | 1,353 | 99 | 5,929 | 128 | 117 | 
- HTML: 4,477
- PDF: 1,353
- XML: 99
- Total: 5,929
- BibTeX: 128
- EndNote: 117
                        
                            Total article views: 4,051 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
                        
                            
                                
                                
                            
                                
                                
                            
                        
                        
                            Cumulative views and downloads 
                                         (calculated since 19 Dec 2023)
                        
                        
                            
                                
                            
                    
                    
                    | HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3,504 | 481 | 66 | 4,051 | 103 | 99 | 
- HTML: 3,504
- PDF: 481
- XML: 66
- Total: 4,051
- BibTeX: 103
- EndNote: 99
                        
                            Total article views: 1,878 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
                        
                            
                                
                                
                            
                                
                                
                            
                        
                        
                            Cumulative views and downloads 
                                         (calculated since 27 Mar 2023)
                        
                        
                            
                                
                            
                    
        
                
            | HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 973 | 872 | 33 | 1,878 | 25 | 18 | 
- HTML: 973
- PDF: 872
- XML: 33
- Total: 1,878
- BibTeX: 25
- EndNote: 18
Viewed (geographical distribution)
                                Total article views: 5,929 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
                                
                                Thereof 5,820 with geography defined
                                    and 109 with unknown origin. 
                            
        
                            
                                Total article views: 4,051 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
                                
                                Thereof 4,018 with geography defined
                                    and 33 with unknown origin. 
                            
        
                            
                                Total article views: 1,878 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
                                
                                Thereof 1,802 with geography defined
                                    and 76 with unknown origin. 
                            
                    | Country | # | Views | % | 
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % | 
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % | 
|---|
| Total: | 0 | 
| HTML: | 0 | 
| PDF: | 0 | 
| XML: | 0 | 
- 1
1
                            | Total: | 0 | 
| HTML: | 0 | 
| PDF: | 0 | 
| XML: | 0 | 
- 1
1
                            | Total: | 0 | 
| HTML: | 0 | 
| PDF: | 0 | 
| XML: | 0 | 
- 1
1
                            Cited
12 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Sparse-to-Dense Prediction of Ocean Subsurface Temperature Using Multilevel Spatiotemporal Information Fusion L. Lei et al. 10.1109/TGRS.2025.3564468
- Incremental Stable/Dynamic Disentanglement Learning for Ocean Subsurface Temperature Prediction L. Lei & Y. Zhou 10.1109/TGRS.2024.3522998
- Sensitivity analysis using physics-based machine learning: an example from surrogate modelling for magnetotellurics N. Lindner et al. 10.1093/gji/ggaf166
- A dynamic informed deep-learning method for future estimation of laboratory stick–slip E. Yue et al. 10.5194/gmd-18-6275-2025
- Current status and construction scheme of smart geothermal field technology G. LI et al. 10.1016/S1876-3804(24)60523-9
- Nonintrusive reduced basis approximation to the solution of the Helmholtz equation: The magnetotellurics case A. Quiaro et al. 10.1190/geo2024-0594.1
- Groundwater LNAPL Contamination Source Identification Based on Stacking Ensemble Surrogate Model Y. Bai et al. 10.3390/w16162274
- Surrogate-model-based calibration of effective transport parameters from push-pull tests in the Horonobe aquifer (Japan) E. Petrova et al. 10.1016/j.geothermics.2025.103449
- About the trustworthiness of physics-based machine learning – considerations for geomechanical applications D. Degen et al. 10.5194/se-16-477-2025
- Quantum-Inspired Neural Radiative Transfer (QINRT): A Multi-Scale Computational Framework for Next-Generation Climate Intelligence M. Akhtar 10.3390/appliedmath5040145
- Novel physics informed-neural networks for estimation of hydraulic conductivity of green infrastructure as a performance metric by solving Richards–Richardson PDE M. Elkhadrawi et al. 10.1007/s00521-023-09378-z
- Toward Understanding the Benefits of Neural Network Parameterizations in Geophysical Inversions: A Study With Neural Fields A. Xu & L. Heagy 10.1109/TGRS.2025.3583970
12 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Sparse-to-Dense Prediction of Ocean Subsurface Temperature Using Multilevel Spatiotemporal Information Fusion L. Lei et al. 10.1109/TGRS.2025.3564468
- Incremental Stable/Dynamic Disentanglement Learning for Ocean Subsurface Temperature Prediction L. Lei & Y. Zhou 10.1109/TGRS.2024.3522998
- Sensitivity analysis using physics-based machine learning: an example from surrogate modelling for magnetotellurics N. Lindner et al. 10.1093/gji/ggaf166
- A dynamic informed deep-learning method for future estimation of laboratory stick–slip E. Yue et al. 10.5194/gmd-18-6275-2025
- Current status and construction scheme of smart geothermal field technology G. LI et al. 10.1016/S1876-3804(24)60523-9
- Nonintrusive reduced basis approximation to the solution of the Helmholtz equation: The magnetotellurics case A. Quiaro et al. 10.1190/geo2024-0594.1
- Groundwater LNAPL Contamination Source Identification Based on Stacking Ensemble Surrogate Model Y. Bai et al. 10.3390/w16162274
- Surrogate-model-based calibration of effective transport parameters from push-pull tests in the Horonobe aquifer (Japan) E. Petrova et al. 10.1016/j.geothermics.2025.103449
- About the trustworthiness of physics-based machine learning – considerations for geomechanical applications D. Degen et al. 10.5194/se-16-477-2025
- Quantum-Inspired Neural Radiative Transfer (QINRT): A Multi-Scale Computational Framework for Next-Generation Climate Intelligence M. Akhtar 10.3390/appliedmath5040145
- Novel physics informed-neural networks for estimation of hydraulic conductivity of green infrastructure as a performance metric by solving Richards–Richardson PDE M. Elkhadrawi et al. 10.1007/s00521-023-09378-z
- Toward Understanding the Benefits of Neural Network Parameterizations in Geophysical Inversions: A Study With Neural Fields A. Xu & L. Heagy 10.1109/TGRS.2025.3583970
Latest update: 30 Oct 2025
Executive editor
        This manuscript provides a review of physics-based machine learning methods, and provides a perspective on their use.
            This manuscript provides a review of physics-based machine learning methods, and provides a...
            
    Short summary
            In geosciences, we often use simulations based on physical laws. These simulations can be computationally expensive, which is a problem if simulations must be performed many times (e.g., to add error bounds). We show how a novel machine learning method helps to reduce simulation time. In comparison to other approaches, which typically only look at the output of a simulation, the method considers physical laws in the simulation itself. The method provides reliable results faster than standard.
            In geosciences, we often use simulations based on physical laws. These simulations can be...
            
         
 
                             
                             
             
             
            