Articles | Volume 16, issue 16
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4639-2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4639-2023
Methods for assessment of models
 | 
18 Aug 2023
Methods for assessment of models |  | 18 Aug 2023

Using Probability Density Functions to Evaluate Models (PDFEM, v1.0) to compare a biogeochemical model with satellite-derived chlorophyll

Bror F. Jönsson, Christopher L. Follett, Jacob Bien, Stephanie Dutkiewicz, Sangwon Hyun, Gemma Kulk, Gael L. Forget, Christian Müller, Marie-Fanny Racault, Christopher N. Hill, Thomas Jackson, and Shubha Sathyendranath

Related authors

Ocean color algorithm for the retrieval of the particle size distribution and carbon-based phytoplankton size classes using a two-component coated-sphere backscattering model
Tihomir S. Kostadinov, Lisl Robertson Lain, Christina Eunjin Kong, Xiaodong Zhang, Stéphane Maritorena, Stewart Bernard, Hubert Loisel, Daniel S. F. Jorge, Ekaterina Kochetkova, Shovonlal Roy, Bror Jonsson, Victor Martinez-Vicente, and Shubha Sathyendranath
Ocean Sci., 19, 703–727, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-19-703-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/os-19-703-2023, 2023
Short summary
Evaluation of oceanic and atmospheric trajectory schemes in the TRACMASS trajectory model v6.0
Kristofer Döös, Bror Jönsson, and Joakim Kjellsson
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 1733–1749, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-1733-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-1733-2017, 2017
Short summary
Evaluating Southern Ocean biological production in two ocean biogeochemical models on daily to seasonal timescales using satellite chlorophyll and O2 / Ar observations
B. F. Jonsson, S. Doney, J. Dunne, and M. L. Bender
Biogeosciences, 12, 681–695, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-681-2015,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-681-2015, 2015
Short summary

Related subject area

Oceanography
A high-resolution physical–biogeochemical model for marine resource applications in the northwest Atlantic (MOM6-COBALT-NWA12 v1.0)
Andrew C. Ross, Charles A. Stock, Alistair Adcroft, Enrique Curchitser, Robert Hallberg, Matthew J. Harrison, Katherine Hedstrom, Niki Zadeh, Michael Alexander, Wenhao Chen, Elizabeth J. Drenkard, Hubert du Pontavice, Raphael Dussin, Fabian Gomez, Jasmin G. John, Dujuan Kang, Diane Lavoie, Laure Resplandy, Alizée Roobaert, Vincent Saba, Sang-Ik Shin, Samantha Siedlecki, and James Simkins
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 6943–6985, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6943-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6943-2023, 2023
Short summary
A flexible z-layers approach for the accurate representation of free surface flows in a coastal ocean model (SHYFEM v. 7_5_71)
Luca Arpaia, Christian Ferrarin, Marco Bajo, and Georg Umgiesser
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 6899–6919, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6899-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6899-2023, 2023
Short summary
Implementation and assessment of a model including mixotrophs and the carbonate cycle (Eco3M_MIX-CarbOx v1.0) in a highly dynamic Mediterranean coastal environment (Bay of Marseille, France) – Part 1: Evolution of ecosystem composition under limited light and nutrient conditions
Lucille Barré, Frédéric Diaz, Thibaut Wagener, France Van Wambeke, Camille Mazoyer, Christophe Yohia, and Christel Pinazo
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 6701–6739, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6701-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6701-2023, 2023
Short summary
Ocean wave tracing v.1: a numerical solver of the wave ray equations for ocean waves on variable currents at arbitrary depths
Trygve Halsne, Kai Håkon Christensen, Gaute Hope, and Øyvind Breivik
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 6515–6530, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6515-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6515-2023, 2023
Short summary
Design and evaluation of an efficient high-precision ocean surface wave model with a multiscale grid system (MSG_Wav1.0)
Jiangyu Li, Shaoqing Zhang, Qingxiang Liu, Xiaolin Yu, and Zhiwei Zhang
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 6393–6412, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6393-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6393-2023, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Aas, E.: Two-stream irradiance model for deep waters, Appl. Optics, 26, 2095–2101, 1987. a
Bailey, S. W. and Werdell, P. J.: A multi-sensor approach for the on-orbit validation of ocean color satellite data products, Remote Sens. Environ., 102, 12–23, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2006.01.015, 2006. a
Beaugrand, G., Reid, P. C., Ibañez, F., and Planque, B.: Biodiversity of North Atlantic and North Sea calanoid copepods, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 204, 299–303, 2000. a
Cael, B., Bisson, K., and Follett, C. L.: Can rates of ocean primary production and biological carbon export be related through their probability distributions?, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 32, 954–970, 2018. a
Campbell, J. W.: The lognormal distribution as a model for bio‐optical variability in the sea, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 100, 13237–13254, https://doi.org/10.1029/95jc00458, 1995. a
Download
Short summary
While biogeochemical models and satellite-derived ocean color data provide unprecedented information, it is problematic to compare them. Here, we present a new approach based on comparing probability density distributions of model and satellite properties to assess model skills. We also introduce Earth mover's distances as a novel and powerful metric to quantify the misfit between models and observations. We find that how 3D chlorophyll fields are aggregated can be a significant source of error.