Articles | Volume 15, issue 23
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8913-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8913-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Model experiment description paper
| 
13 Dec 2022
Model experiment description paper |
| 13 Dec 2022
| 13 Dec 2022
Representing chemical history in ozone time-series predictions – a model experiment study building on the MLAir (v1.5) deep learning framework
Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich Supercomputing Centre (JSC), Jülich, Germany
Institute of Geosciences, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Bonn, Germany
Lukas H. Leufen
Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich Supercomputing Centre (JSC), Jülich, Germany
Institute of Geosciences, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Bonn, Germany
Aurelia Lupascu
Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies, Potsdam, Germany
Tim Butler
Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies, Potsdam, Germany
Martin G. Schultz
Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich Supercomputing Centre (JSC), Jülich, Germany
Related authors
Lukas Hubert Leufen, Felix Kleinert, and Martin G. Schultz
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 1553–1574, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1553-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1553-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
MLAir provides a coherent end-to-end structure for a typical time series analysis workflow using machine learning (ML). MLAir is adaptable to a wide range of ML use cases, focusing in particular on deep learning. The user has a free hand with the ML model itself and can select from different methods during preprocessing, training, and postprocessing. MLAir offers tools to track the experiment conduction, documents necessary ML parameters, and creates a variety of publication-ready plots.
Felix Kleinert, Lukas H. Leufen, and Martin G. Schultz
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 1–25, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
With IntelliO3-ts v1.0, we present an artificial neural network as a new forecasting model for daily aggregated near-surface ozone concentrations with a lead time of up to 4 d. We used measurement and reanalysis data from more than 300 German monitoring stations to train, fine tune, and test the model. We show that the model outperforms standard reference models like persistence models and demonstrate that IntelliO3-ts outperforms climatological reference models for the first 2 d.
Nikhil Korhale, Tabish Ansari, Tim Butler, Jurgita Ovadndevaite, Colin D. O'Dowd, and Liz Coleman
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3824, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3824, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
Short summary
We investigate the distribution and trends of surface ozone and its precursors over Ireland using advanced modelling to determine the drivers of ozone. Trajectory analysis is used to trace the origins of air masses, revealing the impact of transboundary pollution and atmospheric transport. The rising trend has been observed at urban sites over the past two decades, but without a similar trend at coastal sites. Coastal areas consistently show higher ozone levels than rural and urban areas.
Biplob Dey, Toke Due Sjøgren, Peeyush Khare, Georgios I. Gkatzelis, Yizhen Wu, Sindhu Vasireddy, Martin Schultz, Alexander Knohl, Riikka Rinnan, Thorsten Hohaus, and Eva Y. Pfannerstill
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3779, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3779, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Biogeosciences (BG).
Short summary
Short summary
Trees release reactive gases that affect air quality and climate. We studied how these emissions from European beech and English oak change under realistic scenarios of combined and single heat and ozone stress. Heat increased emissions, while ozone reduced most of them. When stressors were combined, the effects were complex and varied by species. Machine learning identified key stress-related compounds. Our findings show that future tree stress may alter air quality and climate interactions.
Xiao Lu, Yiming Liu, Jiayin Su, Xiang Weng, Tabish Ansari, Yuqiang Zhang, Guowen He, Yuqi Zhu, Haolin Wang, Ganquan Zeng, Jingyu Li, Cheng He, Shuai Li, Teerachai Amnuaylojaroen, Tim Butler, Qi Fan, Shaojia Fan, Grant L. Forster, Meng Gao, Jianlin Hu, Yugo Kanaya, Mohd Talib Latif, Keding Lu, Philippe Nédélec, Peer Nowack, Bastien Sauvage, Xiaobin Xu, Lin Zhang, Ke Li, Ja-Ho Koo, and Tatsuya Nagashima
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 7991–8028, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-7991-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-7991-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study analyzes summertime ozone trends in East and Southeast Asia derived from a comprehensive observational database spanning from 1995 to 2019, incorporating aircraft observations, ozonesonde data, and measurements from 2500 surface sites. Multiple models are applied to attribute to changes in anthropogenic emissions and climate. The results highlight that increases in anthropogenic emissions are the primary driver of ozone increases both in the free troposphere and at the surface.
Cynthia H. Whaley, Tim Butler, Jose A. Adame, Rupal Ambulkar, Steve R. Arnold, Rebecca R. Buchholz, Benjamin Gaubert, Douglas S. Hamilton, Min Huang, Hayley Hung, Johannes W. Kaiser, Jacek W. Kaminski, Christoph Knote, Gerbrand Koren, Jean-Luc Kouassi, Meiyun Lin, Tianjia Liu, Jianmin Ma, Kasemsan Manomaiphiboon, Elisa Bergas Masso, Jessica L. McCarty, Mariano Mertens, Mark Parrington, Helene Peiro, Pallavi Saxena, Saurabh Sonwani, Vanisa Surapipith, Damaris Y. T. Tan, Wenfu Tang, Veerachai Tanpipat, Kostas Tsigaridis, Christine Wiedinmyer, Oliver Wild, Yuanyu Xie, and Paquita Zuidema
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 3265–3309, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3265-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3265-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The multi-model experiment design of the HTAP3 Fires project takes a multi-pollutant approach to improving our understanding of transboundary transport of wildland fire and agricultural burning emissions and their impacts. The experiments are designed with the goal of answering science policy questions related to fires. The options for the multi-model approach, including inputs, outputs, and model setup, are discussed, and the official recommendations for the project are presented.
Aditya Nalam, Aura Lupaşcu, Tabish Ansari, and Tim Butler
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 5287–5311, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-5287-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-5287-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Tropospheric O3 molecules are labeled with the identity of their precursor source to simulate contributions from various emission sources to the global tropospheric O3 burden (TOB) and its trends. With an equatorward shift, anthropogenic NOx emissions become significantly more efficient at producing O3 and play a major role in driving TOB trends, mainly due to larger convection at the tropics effectively lifting O3 and its precursors to the free troposphere, where O3 lifetime is longer.
Ramiyou Karim Mache, Sabine Schröder, Michael Langguth, Ankit Patnala, and Martin G. Schultz
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1399, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1399, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The TOAR-classifier model is a data-driven tool that allows for an objective classification of air quality measuring stations as urban, rural, or suburban. Such classification is important in the analysis of air pollutant trends and regional signatures. The model is employed in the second Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report but can also be used in other research work.
Ioannis Kioutsioukis, Christian Hogrefe, Paul A. Makar, Ummugulsun Alyuz, Jessy O. Bash, Roberto Bellasio, Roberto Bianconi, Tim Buttler, Olivia E. Clifton, Philippe Cheung, Alma Hodzic, Richard Kranenburg, Aurelia Lupascu, Kester Momoh, Juan Luis Perez-Camaño, John Pleim, Young-Hee Ryu, Robero San Jose, Donna Schwede, Ranjeet Sokhi, and Stefano Galmarini
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1091, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1091, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Deposition is a key in air quality modelling. An evaluation of the AQMEII4 models is performed prior to analysing the different deposition schemes in relation to the LULC used. Such analysis is unprecedented. Among the results, LULC masks have to be harmonised and up-to-date information used in place of outdated and too course masks. Alternatively LULC masks should be evaluated and intercom pared when multiple model results are analysed.
Paul A. Makar, Philip Cheung, Christian Hogrefe, Ayodeji Akingunola, Ummugulsum Alyuz, Jesse O. Bash, Michael D. Bell, Roberto Bellasio, Roberto Bianconi, Tim Butler, Hazel Cathcart, Olivia E. Clifton, Alma Hodzic, Ioannis Kioutsioukis, Richard Kranenburg, Aurelia Lupascu, Jason A. Lynch, Kester Momoh, Juan L. Perez-Camanyo, Jonathan Pleim, Young-Hee Ryu, Roberto San Jose, Donna Schwede, Thomas Scheuschner, Mark W. Shephard, Ranjeet S. Sokhi, and Stefano Galmarini
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 3049–3107, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-3049-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-3049-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The large range of sulfur and nitrogen deposition estimates from air quality models results in a large range of predicted impacts. We used models and deposition diagnostics to identify the processes controlling atmospheric sulfur and nitrogen deposition variability. Controlling factors included the uptake of gases and aerosols by hydrometeors, aerosol inorganic chemistry, particle dry deposition, ammonia bidirectional fluxes, gas deposition via plant cuticles and soil, and land use data.
Edward C. Chan, Ilona J. Jäkel, Basit Khan, Martijn Schaap, Timothy M. Butler, Renate Forkel, and Sabine Banzhaf
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1119–1139, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1119-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1119-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
An enhanced emission module has been developed for the PALM model system, improving flexibility and scalability of emission source representation across different sectors. A model for parametrized domestic emissions has also been included, for which an idealized model run is conducted for particulate matter (PM10). The results show that, in addition to individual sources and diurnal variations in energy consumption, vertical transport and urban topology play a role in concentration distribution.
Yugo Kanaya, Roberto Sommariva, Alfonso Saiz-Lopez, Andrea Mazzeo, Theodore K. Koenig, Kaori Kawana, James E. Johnson, Aurélie Colomb, Pierre Tulet, Suzie Molloy, Ian E. Galbally, Rainer Volkamer, Anoop Mahajan, John W. Halfacre, Paul B. Shepson, Julia Schmale, Hélène Angot, Byron Blomquist, Matthew D. Shupe, Detlev Helmig, Junsu Gil, Meehye Lee, Sean C. Coburn, Ivan Ortega, Gao Chen, James Lee, Kenneth C. Aikin, David D. Parrish, John S. Holloway, Thomas B. Ryerson, Ilana B. Pollack, Eric J. Williams, Brian M. Lerner, Andrew J. Weinheimer, Teresa Campos, Frank M. Flocke, J. Ryan Spackman, Ilann Bourgeois, Jeff Peischl, Chelsea R. Thompson, Ralf M. Staebler, Amir A. Aliabadi, Wanmin Gong, Roeland Van Malderen, Anne M. Thompson, Ryan M. Stauffer, Debra E. Kollonige, Juan Carlos Gómez Martin, Masatomo Fujiwara, Katie Read, Matthew Rowlinson, Keiichi Sato, Junichi Kurokawa, Yoko Iwamoto, Fumikazu Taketani, Hisahiro Takashima, Monica Navarro Comas, Marios Panagi, and Martin G. Schultz
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-566, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-566, 2025
Revised manuscript accepted for ESSD
Short summary
Short summary
The first comprehensive dataset of tropospheric ozone over oceans/polar regions is presented, including 77 ship/buoy and 48 aircraft campaign observations (1977–2022, 0–5000 m altitude), supplemented by ozonesonde and surface data. Air masses isolated from land for 72+ hours are systematically selected as essentially oceanic. Among the 11 global regions, they show daytime decreases of 10–16% in the tropics, while near-zero depletions are rare, unlike in the Arctic, implying different mechanisms.
Diego Guizzardi, Monica Crippa, Tim Butler, Terry Keating, Rosa Wu, Jacek W. Kamiński, Jeroen Kuenen, Junichi Kurokawa, Satoru Chatani, Tazuko Morikawa, George Pouliot, Jacinthe Racine, Michael D. Moran, Zbigniew Klimont, Patrick M. Manseau, Rabab Mashayekhi, Barron H. Henderson, Steven J. Smith, Rachel Hoesly, Marilena Muntean, Manjola Banja, Edwin Schaaf, Federico Pagani, Jung-Hun Woo, Jinseok Kim, Enrico Pisoni, Junhua Zhang, David Niemi, Mourad Sassi, Annie Duhamel, Tabish Ansari, Kristen Foley, Guannan Geng, Yifei Chen, and Qiang Zhang
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-601, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-601, 2025
Preprint under review for ESSD
Short summary
Short summary
The global air pollution emission mosaic HTAP_v3.1 is the state-of-the-art database for addressing the evolution of a set of policy-relevant air pollutants over the past 2 decades. The inventory is made by the harmonization and blending of seven regional inventories, gapfilled using the most recent release of EDGAR (EDGARv8). By incorporating the best available local information, the HTAP_v3.1 mosaic inventory can be used for policy-relevant studies at both regional and global levels.
Christian Hogrefe, Stefano Galmarini, Paul A. Makar, Ioannis Kioutsioukis, Olivia E. Clifton, Ummugulsum Alyuz, Jesse O. Bash, Roberto Bellasio, Roberto Bianconi, Tim Butler, Philip Cheung, Alma Hodzic, Richard Kranenburg, Aurelia Lupascu, Kester Momoh, Juan Luis Perez-Camanyo, Jonathan E. Pleim, Young-Hee Ryu, Roberto San Jose, Martijn Schaap, Donna B. Schwede, and Ranjeet Sokhi
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-225, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-225, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Performed under the umbrella of the fourth phase of the Air Quality Model Evaluation International Initiative (AQMEII4), this study applies AQMEII4 diagnostic tools to better characterize how dry deposition removes pollutants from the atmosphere in regional-scale models. The results also strongly suggest that improvement and harmonization of the representation of land use in these models would serve the community in their future development efforts.
Sebastian H. M. Hickman, Makoto Kelp, Paul T. Griffiths, Kelsey Doerksen, Kazuyuki Miyazaki, Elyse A. Pennington, Gerbrand Koren, Fernando Iglesias-Suarez, Martin G. Schultz, Kai-Lan Chang, Owen R. Cooper, Alexander T. Archibald, Roberto Sommariva, David Carlson, Hantao Wang, J. Jason West, and Zhenze Liu
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3739, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3739, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Machine learning is being more widely used across environmental and climate science. This work reviews the use of machine learning in tropospheric ozone research, focusing on three main application areas in which significant progress has been made. Common challenges in using machine learning across the three areas are highlighted, and future directions for the field are indicated.
Hantao Wang, Kazuyuki Miyazaki, Haitong Zhe Sun, Zhen Qu, Xiang Liu, Antje Inness, Martin Schultz, Sabine Schröder, Marc Serre, and J. Jason West
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3723, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3723, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We compare six datasets of global ground-level ozone, developed using geostatistical, machine learning, or reanalysis methods. The datasets show important differences from one another in ozone magnitude, greater than 5 ppb, and trends, globally and regionally. Compared with measurements, performance varies among datasets, and most overestimate ozone, particularly at lower concentrations. These differences among datasets highlight uncertainties for applications to health and other impacts.
Tabish Ansari, Aditya Nalam, Aurelia Lupaşcu, Carsten Hinz, Simon Grasse, and Tim Butler
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3752, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3752, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Surface ozone can travel far from its sources. In recent decades, emissions of ozone-forming gases have decreased in North America and Europe but risen in Asia, alongside rising global methane levels. Using advanced modeling, this study reveals that while local reductions in nitrogen oxides have lowered summer ozone, increases in natural and foreign sources offset these gains. Methane remains important, but its ozone impact has declined with reduced local emissions.
Chupeng Zhang, Shangfei Hai, Yang Gao, Yuhang Wang, Shaoqing Zhang, Lifang Sheng, Bin Zhao, Shuxiao Wang, Jingkun Jiang, Xin Huang, Xiaojing Shen, Junying Sun, Aura Lupascu, Manish Shrivastava, Jerome D. Fast, Wenxuan Cheng, Xiuwen Guo, Ming Chu, Nan Ma, Juan Hong, Qiaoqiao Wang, Xiaohong Yao, and Huiwang Gao
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 10713–10730, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-10713-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-10713-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
New particle formation is an important source of atmospheric particles, exerting critical influences on global climate. Numerical models are vital tools to understanding atmospheric particle evolution, which, however, suffer from large biases in simulating particle numbers. Here we improve the model chemical processes governing particle sizes and compositions. The improved model reveals substantial contributions of newly formed particles to climate through effects on cloud condensation nuclei.
Monica Crippa, Diego Guizzardi, Tim Butler, Terry Keating, Rosa Wu, Jacek Kaminski, Jeroen Kuenen, Junichi Kurokawa, Satoru Chatani, Tazuko Morikawa, George Pouliot, Jacinthe Racine, Michael D. Moran, Zbigniew Klimont, Patrick M. Manseau, Rabab Mashayekhi, Barron H. Henderson, Steven J. Smith, Harrison Suchyta, Marilena Muntean, Efisio Solazzo, Manjola Banja, Edwin Schaaf, Federico Pagani, Jung-Hun Woo, Jinseok Kim, Fabio Monforti-Ferrario, Enrico Pisoni, Junhua Zhang, David Niemi, Mourad Sassi, Tabish Ansari, and Kristen Foley
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 2667–2694, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2667-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2667-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This study responds to the global and regional atmospheric modelling community's need for a mosaic of air pollutant emissions with global coverage, long time series, spatially distributed data at a high time resolution, and a high sectoral resolution in order to enhance the understanding of transboundary air pollution. The mosaic approach to integrating official regional emission inventories with a global inventory based on a consistent methodology ensures policy-relevant results.
Edward C. Chan, Joana Leitão, Andreas Kerschbaumer, and Timothy M. Butler
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1427–1444, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1427-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1427-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Yeti is a Handbook Emission Factors for Road Transport-based traffic emission inventory written in the Python 3 scripting language, which adopts a generalized treatment for activity data using traffic information of varying levels of detail introduced in a systematic and consistent manner, with the ability to maximize reusability. Thus, Yeti has been conceived and implemented with a high degree of data and process symmetry, allowing scalable and flexible execution while affording ease of use.
Bing Gong, Michael Langguth, Yan Ji, Amirpasha Mozaffari, Scarlet Stadtler, Karim Mache, and Martin G. Schultz
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 8931–8956, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8931-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8931-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Inspired by the success of deep learning in various domains, we test the applicability of video prediction methods by generative adversarial network (GAN)-based deep learning to predict the 2 m temperature over Europe. Our video prediction models have skill in predicting the diurnal cycle of 2 m temperature up to 12 h ahead. Complemented by probing the relevance of several model parameters, this study confirms the potential of deep learning in meteorological forecasting applications.
Johana Romero-Alvarez, Aurelia Lupaşcu, Douglas Lowe, Alba Badia, Scott Archer-Nicholls, Steve Dorling, Claire E. Reeves, and Tim Butler
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 13797–13815, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13797-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13797-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
As ozone can be transported across countries, efficient air quality management and regulatory policies rely on the assessment of local ozone production vs. transport. In our study, we investigate the origin of surface ozone in the UK and the contribution of the different source regions to regulatory ozone metrics. It is shown that emission controls would be necessary over western Europe to improve health-related metrics and over larger areas to reduce impacts on ecosystems.
Aurelia Lupaşcu, Noelia Otero, Andrea Minkos, and Tim Butler
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 11675–11699, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-11675-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-11675-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Ground-level ozone is an important air pollutant that affects human health, ecosystems, and climate. Ozone is not emitted directly but rather formed in the atmosphere through chemical reactions involving two distinct precursors. Our results provide detailed information about the origin of ozone in Germany during two peak ozone events that took place in 2015 and 2018, thus improving our understanding of ground-level ozone.
Swantje Preuschmann, Tanja Blome, Knut Görl, Fiona Köhnke, Bettina Steuri, Juliane El Zohbi, Diana Rechid, Martin Schultz, Jianing Sun, and Daniela Jacob
Adv. Sci. Res., 19, 51–71, https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-19-51-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-19-51-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The main aspect of the paper is to obtain transferable principles for the development of digital knowledge transfer products. As such products are still unstandardised, the authors explored challenges and approaches for product developments. The authors report what they see as useful principles for developing digital knowledge transfer products, by describing the experience of developing the Net-Zero-2050 Web-Atlas and the "Bodenkohlenstoff-App".
Clara Betancourt, Timo T. Stomberg, Ann-Kathrin Edrich, Ankit Patnala, Martin G. Schultz, Ribana Roscher, Julia Kowalski, and Scarlet Stadtler
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 4331–4354, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4331-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4331-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Ozone is a toxic greenhouse gas with high spatial variability. We present a machine-learning-based ozone-mapping workflow generating a transparent and reliable product. Going beyond standard mapping methods, this work combines explainable machine learning with uncertainty assessment to increase the integrity of the produced map.
Noelia Otero, Oscar E. Jurado, Tim Butler, and Henning W. Rust
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 1905–1919, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-1905-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-1905-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Surface ozone and temperature are strongly dependent and their extremes might be exacerbated by underlying climatological drivers, such as atmospheric blocking. Using an observational data set, we measure the dependence structure between ozone and temperature under the influence of atmospheric blocking. Blocks enhanced the probability of occurrence of compound ozone and temperature extremes over northwestern and central Europe, leading to greater health risks.
Stefano Galmarini, Paul Makar, Olivia E. Clifton, Christian Hogrefe, Jesse O. Bash, Roberto Bellasio, Roberto Bianconi, Johannes Bieser, Tim Butler, Jason Ducker, Johannes Flemming, Alma Hodzic, Christopher D. Holmes, Ioannis Kioutsioukis, Richard Kranenburg, Aurelia Lupascu, Juan Luis Perez-Camanyo, Jonathan Pleim, Young-Hee Ryu, Roberto San Jose, Donna Schwede, Sam Silva, and Ralf Wolke
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 15663–15697, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15663-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15663-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This technical note presents the research protocols for phase 4 of the Air Quality Model Evaluation International Initiative (AQMEII4). This initiative has three goals: (i) to define the state of wet and dry deposition in regional models, (ii) to evaluate how dry deposition influences air concentration and flux predictions, and (iii) to identify the causes for prediction differences. The evaluation compares LULC-specific dry deposition and effective conductances and fluxes.
Edward C. Chan and Timothy M. Butler
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 4555–4572, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-4555-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-4555-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
A large-eddy simulation based chemical transport model is implemented for an idealized street canyon. The dynamics of the model are evaluated using stationary measurements. A transient model run is also conducted over a 24 h period, where variations of pollutant concentrations indicate dependence on emissions, background concentrations, and solar state. Comparison stationary model runs show changes in flow structure concentrations.
Clara Betancourt, Timo Stomberg, Ribana Roscher, Martin G. Schultz, and Scarlet Stadtler
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 3013–3033, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-3013-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-3013-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
With the AQ-Bench dataset, we contribute to shared data usage and machine learning methods in the field of environmental science. The AQ-Bench dataset contains air quality data and metadata from more than 5500 air quality observation stations all over the world. The dataset offers a low-threshold entrance to machine learning on a real-world environmental dataset. AQ-Bench thus provides a blueprint for environmental benchmark datasets.
Elena Macdonald, Noelia Otero, and Tim Butler
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 4007–4023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-4007-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-4007-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
NO2 limit values are still regularly exceeded in many European cities despite decreasing emissions. Measurements of NOx concentrations from stations across Europe were systematically analysed to assess long-term changes observed in urban areas. We compared trends in concentration increments to trends in total and traffic emissions to find potential discrepancies. The results can help in evaluating inaccuracies in emission inventories and in improving spatial imbalances in data availability.
Lukas Hubert Leufen, Felix Kleinert, and Martin G. Schultz
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 1553–1574, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1553-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1553-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
MLAir provides a coherent end-to-end structure for a typical time series analysis workflow using machine learning (ML). MLAir is adaptable to a wide range of ML use cases, focusing in particular on deep learning. The user has a free hand with the ML model itself and can select from different methods during preprocessing, training, and postprocessing. MLAir offers tools to track the experiment conduction, documents necessary ML parameters, and creates a variety of publication-ready plots.
Felix Kleinert, Lukas H. Leufen, and Martin G. Schultz
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 1–25, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
With IntelliO3-ts v1.0, we present an artificial neural network as a new forecasting model for daily aggregated near-surface ozone concentrations with a lead time of up to 4 d. We used measurement and reanalysis data from more than 300 German monitoring stations to train, fine tune, and test the model. We show that the model outperforms standard reference models like persistence models and demonstrate that IntelliO3-ts outperforms climatological reference models for the first 2 d.
Tim Butler, Aurelia Lupascu, and Aditya Nalam
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 10707–10731, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-10707-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-10707-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Ground-level ozone (O3) is not directly emitted; it is formed chemically in the atmosphere. Some ground-level O3 is transported from the stratosphere, but most O3 is produced from reactive precursors that are emitted by both natural and anthropogenic sources. We present the results of a novel source apportionment method for ground-level O3. Our results are consistent with previous work and also provide new insights. In particular, we highlight the roles of methane and international shipping.
Cited articles
Abadi, M., Agarwal, A., Barham, P., Brevdo, E., Chen, Z., Citro, C., Corrado,
G. S., Davis, A., Dean, J., Devin, M., Ghemawat, S., Goodfellow, I., Harp,
A., Irving, G., Isard, M., Jia, Y., Jozefowicz, R., Kaiser, L., Kudlur, M.,
Levenberg, J., Mané, D., Monga, R., Moore, S., Murray, D., Olah, C.,
Schuster, M., Shlens, J., Steiner, B., Sutskever, I., Talwar, K., Tucker, P.,
Vanhoucke, V., Vasudevan, V., Viégas, F., Vinyals, O., Warden, P.,
Wattenberg, M., Wicke, M., Yu, Y., and Zheng, X.: TensorFlow: Large-Scale
Machine Learning on Heterogeneous Systems,
https://www.tensorflow.org/ (last access: 1 December 2022), 2015. a
Abdi‐Oskouei, M., Carmichael, G., Christiansen, M., Ferrada, G., Roozitalab,
B., Sobhani, N., Wade, K., Czarnetzki, A., Pierce, R., Wagner, T., and
Stanier, C.: Sensitivity of Meteorological Skill to Selection of
WRF‐Chem Physical Parameterizations and Impact on Ozone
Prediction During the Lake Michigan Ozone Study (LMOS), J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125, e2019JD031971, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031971, 2020. a
Aliaga, D., Sinclair, V. A., Andrade, M., Artaxo, P., Carbone, S., Kadantsev, E., Laj, P., Wiedensohler, A., Krejci, R., and Bianchi, F.: Identifying source regions of air masses sampled at the tropical high-altitude site of Chacaltaya using WRF-FLEXPART and cluster analysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 16453–16477, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-16453-2021, 2021. a
Archibald, A. T., Neu, J. L., Elshorbany, Y. F., Cooper, O. R., Young, P. J.,
Akiyoshi, H., Cox, R. A., Coyle, M., Derwent, R. G., Deushi, M., Finco, A.,
Frost, G. J., Galbally, I. E., Gerosa, G., Granier, C., Griffiths, P. T.,
Hossaini, R., Hu, L., Jöckel, P., Josse, B., Lin, M. Y., Mertens, M.,
Morgenstern, O., Naja, M., Naik, V., Oltmans, S., Plummer, D. A., Revell,
L. E., Saiz-Lopez, A., Saxena, P., Shin, Y. M., Shahid, I., Shallcross, D.,
Tilmes, S., Trickl, T., Wallington, T. J., Wang, T., Worden, H. M., and Zeng,
G.: Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report: A critical review of
changes in the tropospheric ozone burden and budget from 1850 to 2100,
Elementa, 8, 034,
https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2020.034, 2020. a
Avnery, S., Mauzerall, D. L., Liu, J., and Horowitz, L. W.: Global crop yield
reductions due to surface ozone exposure: 1. Year 2000 crop production
losses and economic damage, Atmos. Environ., 45, 2284–2296,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.11.045, 2011. a
Bauerle, A., van Onzenoodt, C., and Ropinski, T.: Net2Vis – A Visual Grammar
for Automatically Generating Publication-Tailored CNN Architecture
Visualizations, IEEE T. Vis. Compu. Gr., 27,
2980–2991, https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2021.3057483, 2021. a
Betancourt, C., Stomberg, T., Roscher, R., Schultz, M. G., and Stadtler, S.: AQ-Bench: a benchmark dataset for machine learning on global air quality metrics, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 3013–3033, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-3013-2021, 2021. a
CLC: Copernicus Land Monitoring Service: Corine Land Cover,
http://land.copernicus.eu/pan-european/corine-land-cover/clc-2012/ (last access: 1 December 2022),
2012. a
Clevert, D.-A., Unterthiner, T., and Hochreiter, S.: Fast and Accurate Deep
Network Learning by Exponential Linear Units (ELUs),
arXiv [preprint],
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1511.07289, 2016. a
Dee, D. P., Uppala, S. M., Simmons, A. J., Berrisford, P., Poli, P., Kobayashi,
S., Andrae, U., Balmaseda, M. A., Balsamo, G., Bauer, P., Bechtold, P.,
Beljaars, A. C. M., van de Berg, L., Bidlot, J., Bormann, N., Delsol, C.,
Dragani, R., Fuentes, M., Geer, A. J., Haimberger, L., Healy, S. B.,
Hersbach, H., Hólm, E. V., Isaksen, L., Kållberg, P., Köhler, M.,
Matricardi, M., McNally, A. P., Monge-Sanz, B. M., Morcrette, J.-J., Park,
B.-K., Peubey, C., de Rosnay, P., Tavolato, C., Thépaut, J.-N., and Vitart,
F.: The ERA-Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data
assimilation system, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,
137, 553–597, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.828, 2011. a
DWD: Monthly description,
https://www.dwd.de/EN/ourservices/klimakartendeutschland/klimakartendeutschland_monatsbericht.html?nn=495490#buehneTop (last access: 1 December 2022),
2022. a
Emmons, L. K., Walters, S., Hess, P. G., Lamarque, J.-F., Pfister, G. G., Fillmore, D., Granier, C., Guenther, A., Kinnison, D., Laepple, T., Orlando, J., Tie, X., Tyndall, G., Wiedinmyer, C., Baughcum, S. L., and Kloster, S.: Description and evaluation of the Model for Ozone and Related chemical Tracers, version 4 (MOZART-4), Geosci. Model Dev., 3, 43–67, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-3-43-2010, 2010. a
Eslami, E., Choi, Y., Lops, Y., and Sayeed, A.: A real-time hourly ozone prediction system using deep convolutional neural network, Neural Comput. Appl., 32, 8783–8797, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-019-04282-x, 2020. a
European Parliament, C. o. t. E. U.: Directive 2008/50/EC of the European
Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2008 on ambient air quality and
cleaner air for Europe,
http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2008/50/oj (last access: 1 December 2022), 2008. a
Fast, J. D., Allan, J., Bahreini, R., Craven, J., Emmons, L., Ferrare, R., Hayes, P. L., Hodzic, A., Holloway, J., Hostetler, C., Jimenez, J. L., Jonsson, H., Liu, S., Liu, Y., Metcalf, A., Middlebrook, A., Nowak, J., Pekour, M., Perring, A., Russell, L., Sedlacek, A., Seinfeld, J., Setyan, A., Shilling, J., Shrivastava, M., Springston, S., Song, C., Subramanian, R., Taylor, J. W., Vinoj, V., Yang, Q., Zaveri, R. A., and Zhang, Q.: Modeling regional aerosol and aerosol precursor variability over California and its sensitivity to emissions and long-range transport during the 2010 CalNex and CARES campaigns, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 10013–10060, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-10013-2014, 2014. a
Fleming, Z. L., Doherty, R. M., von Schneidemesser, E., Malley, C. S., Cooper,
O. R., Pinto, J. P., Colette, A., Xu, X., Simpson, D., Schultz, M. G.,
Lefohn, A. S., Hamad, S., Moolla, R., Solberg, S., and Feng, Z.: Tropospheric
Ozone Assessment Report: Present-day ozone distribution and trends
relevant to human health, Elementa, 6, 12,
https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.273, 2018. a, b
Galmarini, S., Makar, P., Clifton, O. E., Hogrefe, C., Bash, J. O., Bellasio, R., Bianconi, R., Bieser, J., Butler, T., Ducker, J., Flemming, J., Hodzic, A., Holmes, C. D., Kioutsioukis, I., Kranenburg, R., Lupascu, A., Perez-Camanyo, J. L., Pleim, J., Ryu, Y.-H., San Jose, R., Schwede, D., Silva, S., and Wolke, R.: Technical note: AQMEII4 Activity 1: evaluation of wet and dry deposition schemes as an integral part of regional-scale air quality models, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 15663–15697, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15663-2021, 2021. a
Gaudel, A., Cooper, O. R., Ancellet, G., Barret, B., Boynard, A., Burrows,
J. P., Clerbaux, C., Coheur, P.-F., Cuesta, J., Cuevas, E., Doniki, S.,
Dufour, G., Ebojie, F., Foret, G., Garcia, O., Granados-Muñoz, M. J.,
Hannigan, J. W., Hase, F., Hassler, B., Huang, G., Hurtmans, D., Jaffe, D.,
Jones, N., Kalabokas, P., Kerridge, B., Kulawik, S., Latter, B., Leblanc, T.,
Le Flochmoën, E., Lin, W., Liu, J., Liu, X., Mahieu, E., McClure-Begley, A.,
Neu, J. L., Osman, M., Palm, M., Petetin, H., Petropavlovskikh, I., Querel,
R., Rahpoe, N., Rozanov, A., Schultz, M. G., Schwab, J., Siddans, R., Smale,
D., Steinbacher, M., Tanimoto, H., Tarasick, D. W., Thouret, V., Thompson,
A. M., Trickl, T., Weatherhead, E., Wespes, C., Worden, H. M., Vigouroux, C.,
Xu, X., Zeng, G., and Ziemke, J.: Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report:
Present-day distribution and trends of tropospheric ozone relevant to
climate and global atmospheric chemistry model evaluation, Elementa, 6, 39, https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.291, 2018. a
Georgiou, G. K., Christoudias, T., Proestos, Y., Kushta, J., Hadjinicolaou, P., and Lelieveld, J.: Air quality modelling in the summer over the eastern Mediterranean using WRF-Chem: chemistry and aerosol mechanism intercomparison, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 1555–1571, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-1555-2018, 2018. a
Gong, B., Langguth, M., Ji, Y., Mozaffari, A., Stadtler, S., Mache, K., and Schultz, M. G.: Temperature forecasting by deep learning methods, Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss. [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2021-430, in review, 2022. a
Grell, G. A., Peckham, S. E., Schmitz, R., McKeen, S. A., Frost, G.,
Skamarock, W. C., and Eder, B.: Fully coupled “online” chemistry within
the WRF model, Atmos. Environ., 39, 6957–6975,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.04.027, 2005. a, b
Guenther, A., Karl, T., Harley, P., Wiedinmyer, C., Palmer, P. I., and Geron, C.: Estimates of global terrestrial isoprene emissions using MEGAN (Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 3181–3210, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3181-2006, 2006. a
Gupta, M. and Mohan, M.: Validation of WRF/Chem model and sensitivity of
chemical mechanisms to ozone simulation over megacity Delhi, Atmos.
Environ., 122, 220–229, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.09.039, 2015. a
He, T., Jones, D. B. A., Miyazaki, K., Huang, B., Liu, Y., Jiang, Z., White,
E. C., Worden, H. M., and Worden, J. R.: Deep Learning to Evaluate US NOx Emissions Using Surface Ozone Predictions, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 127, e2021JD035597, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD035597, 2022. a, b
Hoyer, S. and Hamman, J.: xarray: N-D labeled arrays and datasets in
Python, J. Open Res. Softw., 5, p. 10, https://doi.org/10.5334/jors.148, 2017. a
Inness, A., Ades, M., Agustí-Panareda, A., Barré, J., Benedictow, A., Blechschmidt, A.-M., Dominguez, J. J., Engelen, R., Eskes, H., Flemming, J., Huijnen, V., Jones, L., Kipling, Z., Massart, S., Parrington, M., Peuch, V.-H., Razinger, M., Remy, S., Schulz, M., and Suttie, M.: The CAMS reanalysis of atmospheric composition, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 3515–3556, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-3515-2019, 2019. a
Ismail Fawaz, H., Lucas, B., Forestier, G., Pelletier, C., Schmidt, D. F.,
Weber, J., Webb, G. I., Idoumghar, L., Muller, P.-A., and Petitjean, F.:
InceptionTime: Finding AlexNet for time series classification, Data
Min. Knowl. Disc., 34, 1936–1962,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10618-020-00710-y, 2020. a
Kingma, D. P. and Ba, J.: Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization,
arXiv [preprint], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1412.6980, 2014. a
Kleinert, F., Leufen, L. H., Lupaşcu, A., Butler, T., and Schultz, M. G.:
Representing chemical history in ozone time-series predictions – a model
experiment study building on the MLAir (v1.5) deep learning framework:
Experiments and source code, b2share [code], https://doi.org/10.34730/19c94b0b77374395b11cb54991cc497d,
2022a. a
Kleinert, F., Leufen, L. H., Lupaşcu, A., Butler, T., and Schultz, M. G.:
Representing chemical history in ozone time-series predictions – a model
experiment study building on the MLAir (v1.5) deep learning framework: Data
1/4, b2share [data set], https://doi.org/10.34730/c799f04beb644e38a575fa20c2dd8d40, 2022b. a
Kleinert, F., Leufen, L. H., Lupaşcu, A., Butler, T., and Schultz, M. G.:
Representing chemical history in ozone time-series predictions – a model
experiment study building on the MLAir (v1.5) deep learning framework: Data
2/4, b2share [data set], https://doi.org/10.34730/d5f34ae6a8e34d4c8ac33f75b993e8a9, 2022c. a
Kleinert, F., Leufen, L. H., Lupaşcu, A., Butler, T., and Schultz, M. G.:
Representing chemical history in ozone time-series predictions – a model
experiment study building on the MLAir (v1.5) deep learning framework: Data
3/4, b2share [data set], https://doi.org/10.34730/a423ec9003194209989726a95a1a490c, 2022d. a
Kleinert, F., Leufen, L. H., Lupaşcu, A., Butler, T., and Schultz, M. G.:
Representing chemical history in ozone time-series predictions – a model
experiment study building on the MLAir (v1.5) deep learning framework: Data
4/4, b2share [data set], https://doi.org/10.34730/718262bd2c894fd6aadce19a08040f69, 2022e. a
Knote, C., Hodzic, A., Jimenez, J. L., Volkamer, R., Orlando, J. J., Baidar, S., Brioude, J., Fast, J., Gentner, D. R., Goldstein, A. H., Hayes, P. L., Knighton, W. B., Oetjen, H., Setyan, A., Stark, H., Thalman, R., Tyndall, G., Washenfelder, R., Waxman, E., and Zhang, Q.: Simulation of semi-explicit mechanisms of SOA formation from glyoxal in aerosol in a 3-D model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 6213–6239, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-6213-2014, 2014. a
Kuenen, J. J. P., Visschedijk, A. J. H., Jozwicka, M., and Denier van der Gon, H. A. C.: TNO-MACC_II emission inventory; a multi-year (2003–2009) consistent high-resolution European emission inventory for air quality modelling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 10963–10976, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-10963-2014, 2014. a
Kuik, F., Lauer, A., Churkina, G., Denier van der Gon, H. A. C., Fenner, D., Mar, K. A., and Butler, T. M.: Air quality modelling in the Berlin–Brandenburg region using WRF-Chem v3.7.1: sensitivity to resolution of model grid and input data, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 4339–4363, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-4339-2016, 2016. a
Lee, A. X., Zhang, R., Ebert, F., Abbeel, P., Finn, C., and Levine, S.:
Stochastic Adversarial Video Prediction, arXiv [preprint],
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1804.01523 2018. a
Leonard, J., Kramer, M., and Ungar, L.: A neural network architecture that
computes its own reliability, Comput. Chem. Eng., 16,
819–835, https://doi.org/10.1016/0098-1354(92)80035-8, 1992. a
Leufen, L. H., Kleinert, F., and Schultz, M. G.: MLAir (v1.0) – a tool to enable fast and flexible machine learning on air data time series, Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 1553–1574, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1553-2021, 2021. a, b, c, d
Leufen, L. H., Kleinert, F., and Schultz, M. G.: Exploring decomposition of
temporal patterns to facilitate learning of neural networks for ground-level
daily maximum 8-hour average ozone prediction, Environ. Data Sci., 1,
e10, https://doi.org/10.1017/eds.2022.9, 2022. a
Liu, Z., Doherty, R. M., Wild, O., O'Connor, F. M., and Turnock, S. T.: Correcting ozone biases in a global chemistry–climate model: implications for future ozone, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 12543–12557, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-12543-2022, 2022. a
Lupaşcu, A. and Butler, T.: Source attribution of European surface O3 using a tagged O3 mechanism, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 14535–14558, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-14535-2019, 2019. a
Mar, K. A., Ojha, N., Pozzer, A., and Butler, T. M.: Ozone air quality simulations with WRF-Chem (v3.5.1) over Europe: model evaluation and chemical mechanism comparison, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 3699–3728, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3699-2016, 2016. a
Mills, G., Pleijel, H., Malley, C. S., Sinha, B., Cooper, O. R., Schultz,
M. G., Neufeld, H. S., Simpson, D., Sharps, K., Feng, Z., Gerosa, G.,
Harmens, H., Kobayashi, K., Saxena, P., Paoletti, E., Sinha, V., and Xu, X.:
Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report: Present-day tropospheric ozone
distribution and trends relevant to vegetation, Elementa, 6, 47, https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.302, 2018. a, b
Murphy, A. H.: Skill Scores Based on the Mean Square Error and Their
Relationships to the Correlation Coefficient, Mont. Weather Rev., 116,
2417–2424, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1988)116<2417:SSBOTM>2.0.CO;2, 1988. a
Pastore, A. and Carnini, M.: Extrapolating from neural network models: a
cautionary tale, J. Phys. G, 48,
084001, https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6471/abf08a, 2021. a
Pathak, J., Subramanian, S., Harrington, P., Raja, S., Chattopadhyay, A.,
Mardani, M., Kurth, T., Hall, D., Li, Z., Azizzadenesheli, K., Hassanzadeh,
P., Kashinath, K., and Anandkumar, A.: FourCastNet: A Global
Data-driven High-resolution Weather Model using Adaptive Fourier
Neural Operators, arXiv [preprint],
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2202.11214, 2022. a
Pisso, I., Sollum, E., Grythe, H., Kristiansen, N. I., Cassiani, M., Eckhardt, S., Arnold, D., Morton, D., Thompson, R. L., Groot Zwaaftink, C. D., Evangeliou, N., Sodemann, H., Haimberger, L., Henne, S., Brunner, D., Burkhart, J. F., Fouilloux, A., Brioude, J., Philipp, A., Seibert, P., and Stohl, A.: The Lagrangian particle dispersion model FLEXPART version 10.4, Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 4955–4997, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4955-2019, 2019. a
Rasp, S., Dueben, P. D., Scher, S., Weyn, J. A., Mouatadid, S., and Thuerey,
N.: WeatherBench: A Benchmark Data Set for Data‐Driven
Weather Forecasting, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 12, e2020MS002203,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2020MS002203, 2020. a
Ren, X., Mi, Z., Cai, T., Nolte, C. G., and Georgopoulos, P. G.: Flexible
Bayesian Ensemble Machine Learning Framework for Predicting
Local Ozone Concentrations, Environ. Sci. Technol., 56,
3871–3883, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c04076, 2022. a
Rocklin, M.: Dask: Parallel computation with blocked algorithms and task
scheduling, in: Proceedings of the 14th python in science conference,
Citeseer [paper descr. code], 130–136, https://conference.scipy.org/proceedings/scipy2015/pdfs/matthew_rocklin.pdf (last access: 1 December 2022), 2015. a
Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., and Brox, T.: U-Net: Convolutional Networks for
Biomedical Image Segmentation, in: Medical Image Computing and
Computer-Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2015, edited by: Navab, N.,
Hornegger, J., Wells, W. M., and Frangi, A. F., Springer
International Publishing, Cham, 234–241, https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.1505.04597, 2015. a, b
Sayeed, A., Choi, Y., Eslami, E., Lops, Y., Roy, A., and Jung, J.: Using a deep
convolutional neural network to predict 2017 ozone concentrations, 24 hours
in advance, Neural Networks, 121, 396–408,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2019.09.033, 2020. a
Sayeed, A., Choi, Y., Eslami, E., Jung, J., Lops, Y., Salman, A. K., Lee,
J.-B., Park, H.-J., and Choi, M.-H.: A novel CMAQ-CNN hybrid model to
forecast hourly surface-ozone concentrations 14 days in advance, Sci.
Rep., 11, 10891, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90446-6, 2021. a
Sayeed, A., Eslami, E., Lops, Y., and Choi, Y.: CMAQ-CNN: A new-generation
of post-processing techniques for chemical transport models using deep neural
networks, Atmos. Environ., 273, 118961,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.118961, 2022. a
Schultz, M. G., Schröder, S., Lyapina, O., Cooper, O., Galbally, I.,
Petropavlovskikh, I., Von Schneidemesser, E., Tanimoto, H., Elshorbany, Y.,
Naja, M., Seguel, R., Dauert, U., Eckhardt, P., Feigenspahn, S., Fiebig, M.,
Hjellbrekke, A.-G., Hong, Y.-D., Christian Kjeld, P., Koide, H., Lear, G.,
Tarasick, D., Ueno, M., Wallasch, M., Baumgardner, D., Chuang, M.-T.,
Gillett, R., Lee, M., Molloy, S., Moolla, R., Wang, T., Sharps, K., Adame,
J. A., Ancellet, G., Apadula, F., Artaxo, P., Barlasina, M., Bogucka, M.,
Bonasoni, P., Chang, L., Colomb, A., Cuevas, E., Cupeiro, M., Degorska, A.,
Ding, A., Fröhlich, M., Frolova, M., Gadhavi, H., Gheusi, F., Gilge, S.,
Gonzalez, M. Y., Gros, V., Hamad, S. H., Helmig, D., Henriques, D.,
Hermansen, O., Holla, R., Huber, J., Im, U., Jaffe, D. A., Komala, N.,
Kubistin, D., Lam, K.-S., Laurila, T., Lee, H., Levy, I., Mazzoleni, C.,
Mazzoleni, L., McClure-Begley, A., Mohamad, M., Murovic, M., Navarro-Comas,
M., Nicodim, F., Parrish, D., Read, K. A., Reid, N., Ries, L., Saxena, P.,
Schwab, J. J., Scorgie, Y., Senik, I., Simmonds, P., Sinha, V., Skorokhod,
A., Spain, G., Spangl, W., Spoor, R., Springston, S. R., Steer, K.,
Steinbacher, M., Suharguniyawan, E., Torre, P., Trickl, T., Weili, L.,
Weller, R., Xu, X., Xue, L., and Zhiqiang, M.: Tropospheric Ozone Assessment
Report: Database and Metrics Data of Global Surface Ozone Observations,
Elementa, 5, 58, https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.244,
2017. a
Schultz, M. G., Betancourt, C., Gong, B., Kleinert, F., Langguth, M., Leufen,
L. H., Mozaffari, A., and Stadtler, S.: Can deep learning beat numerical
weather prediction?, Philos. T. Roy. Soc. A, 379, 20200097,
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2020.0097, 2021. a, b
Selke, N., Schröder, S., and Schultz, M. G.: toarstats,
https://gitlab.jsc.fz-juelich.de/esde/toar-public/toarstats (last access: 1 December 2022),
2021. a
Sengupta, U., Amos, M., Hosking, J. S., Rasmussen, C. E., Juniper, M., and
Young, P. J.: Ensembling geophysical models with Bayesian Neural
Networks, arXiv [preprint],
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2010.03561,, 2020. a, b
Shi, X., Chen, Z., Wang, H., Yeung, D.-Y., Wong, W.-k., and Woo, W.-c.:
Convolutional LSTM Network: A Machine Learning Approach for
Precipitation Nowcasting, in: Proceedings of the 28th International
Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems – Volume 1,
NIPS'15, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, event-place:
Montreal, Canada, 802–810, 2015. a
Stadtler, S., Betancourt, C., and Roscher, R.: Explainable Machine Learning
Reveals Capabilities, Redundancy, and Limitations of a Geospatial Air Quality
Benchmark Dataset, Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction, 4, 150–171,
https://doi.org/10.3390/make4010008, 2022. a
Steffenel, L. A., Anabor, V., Kirsch Pinheiro, D., Guzman, L.,
Dornelles Bittencourt, G., and Bencherif, H.: Forecasting upper atmospheric
scalars advection using deep learning: an O3 experiment, Special Issue on Machine Learning for Earth Observation Data,
Mach.
Learn., 1–24, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10994-020-05944-x, 2021. a
Stohl, A., Hittenberger, M., and Wotawa, G.: Validation of the lagrangian
particle dispersion model FLEXPART against large-scale tracer experiment
data, Atmos. Environ., 32, 4245–4264,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00184-8, 1998. a
Stohl, A., Klimont, Z., Eckhardt, S., Kupiainen, K., Shevchenko, V. P., Kopeikin, V. M., and Novigatsky, A. N.: Black carbon in the Arctic: the underestimated role of gas flaring and residential combustion emissions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 8833–8855, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8833-2013, 2013. a
Sun, H., Shin, Y. M., Xia, M., Ke, S., Wan, M., Yuan, L., Guo, Y., and
Archibald, A. T.: Spatial Resolved Surface Ozone with Urban and
Rural Differentiation during 1990–2019: A Space–Time Bayesian
Neural Network Downscaler, Environ. Sci. Technol., 56,
7337–7349, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c04797, 2022. a
Szegedy, C., Wei Liu, Yangqing Jia, Sermanet, P., Reed, S., Anguelov, D.,
Erhan, D., Vanhoucke, V., and Rabinovich, A.: Going deeper with convolutions,
in: 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern
Recognition (CVPR), IEEE, Boston, MA, USA, 1–9,
https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2015.7298594, 2015. a, b
Tarasick, D., Galbally, I. E., Cooper, O. R., Schultz, M. G., Ancellet, G.,
Leblanc, T., Wallington, T. J., Ziemke, J., Liu, X., Steinbacher, M.,
Staehelin, J., Vigouroux, C., Hannigan, J. W., García, O., Foret, G., Zanis,
P., Weatherhead, E., Petropavlovskikh, I., Worden, H., Osman, M., Liu, J.,
Chang, K.-L., Gaudel, A., Lin, M., Granados-Muñoz, M., Thompson, A. M.,
Oltmans, S. J., Cuesta, J., Dufour, G., Thouret, V., Hassler, B., Trickl, T.,
and Neu, J. L.: Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report: Tropospheric
ozone from 1877 to 2016, observed levels, trends and uncertainties, Elementa, 7, 39, https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.376, 2019. a
Wang, Y., Gao, Z., Long, M., Wang, J., and Yu, P. S.: PredRNN++: Towards
A Resolution of the Deep-in-Time Dilemma in Spatiotemporal
Predictive Learning, in: Proceedings of the 35th International
Conference on Machine Learning, edited by: Dy, J. and Krause, A.,
vol. 80 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research,
5123–5132,
https://proceedings.mlr.press/v80/wang18b.html (last access: 1 December 2022), 2018.
a
Wenig, M., Spichtinger, N., Stohl, A., Held, G., Beirle, S., Wagner, T., Jähne, B., and Platt, U.: Intercontinental transport of nitrogen oxide pollution plumes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 3, 387–393, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-3-387-2003, 2003. a
WHO: Health risks of air pollution in Europe – HRAPIE project.
Recommendations for concentration–response functions for cost–benefit
analysis of particulate matter, ozone and nitrogen dioxide, Tech. rep., WHO
Regional Office for Europe, UN City, Marmorvej 51 DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø,
Denmark,
https://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/238956/Health_risks_air_pollution_HRAPIE_project.pdf (last access: 1 December 2022)
2013. a
Wiedinmyer, C., Akagi, S. K., Yokelson, R. J., Emmons, L. K., Al-Saadi, J. A., Orlando, J. J., and Soja, A. J.: The Fire INventory from NCAR (FINN): a high resolution global model to estimate the emissions from open burning, Geosci. Model Dev., 4, 625–641, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-625-2011, 2011. a
Yi, X., Zhang, J., Wang, Z., Li, T., and Zheng, Y.: Deep Distributed Fusion
Network for Air Quality Prediction, in: Proceedings of the 24th ACM
SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining,
ACM, 965–973, https://doi.org/10.1145/3219819.3219822, 2018. a, b, c
Young, P. J., Naik, V., Fiore, A. M., Gaudel, A., Guo, J., Lin, M. Y., Neu,
J. L., Parrish, D. D., Rieder, H. E., Schnell, J. L., Tilmes, S., Wild, O.,
Zhang, L., Ziemke, J., Brandt, J., Delcloo, A., Doherty, R. M., Geels, C.,
Hegglin, M. I., Hu, L., Im, U., Kumar, R., Luhar, A., Murray, L., Plummer,
D., Rodriguez, J., Saiz-Lopez, A., Schultz, M. G., Woodhouse, M. T., and
Zeng, G.: Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report: Assessment of
global-scale model performance for global and regional ozone distributions,
variability, and trends, Elementa, 6, 10,
https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.265, 2018. a
Yu, C., Zhao, T., Bai, Y., Zhang, L., Kong, S., Yu, X., He, J., Cui, C., Yang, J., You, Y., Ma, G., Wu, M., and Chang, J.: Heavy air pollution with a unique “non-stagnant” atmospheric boundary layer in the Yangtze River middle basin aggravated by regional transport of PM2.5 over China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 7217–7230, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-7217-2020, 2020. a, b
Zaveri, R. A., Easter, R. C., Fast, J. D., and Peters, L. K.: Model for
Simulating Aerosol Interactions and Chemistry (MOSAIC), J.
Geophys. Res., 113, D13204, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008782, 2008. a
Ziyin, L., Hartwig, T., and Ueda, M.: Neural Networks Fail to Learn Periodic
Functions and How to Fix It, in: Advances in Neural Information Processing
Systems, edited by: Larochelle, H., Ranzato, M., Hadsell, R., Balcan, M. F.,
and Lin, H., 33, 1583–1594, https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2020/file/1160453108d3e537255e9f7b931f4e90-Paper.pdf (last access: 1 December 2022),
2020. a
Short summary
We examine the effects of spatially aggregated upstream information as input for a deep learning model forecasting near-surface ozone levels. Using aggregated data from one upstream sector (45°) improves the forecast by ~ 10 % for 4 prediction days. Three upstream sectors improve the forecasts by ~ 14 % on the first 2 d only. Our results serve as an orientation for other researchers or environmental agencies focusing on pointwise time-series predictions, for example, due to regulatory purposes.
We examine the effects of spatially aggregated upstream information as input for a deep learning...
