Articles | Volume 15, issue 7
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2791-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2791-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Development and technical paper
| 
06 Apr 2022
Development and technical paper |
| 06 Apr 2022
| 06 Apr 2022
Landslide Susceptibility Assessment Tools v1.0.0b – Project Manager Suite: a new modular toolkit for landslide susceptibility assessment
Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources (BGR),
30655 Hanover, Germany
Nick Schüßler
Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources (BGR),
30655 Hanover, Germany
Michael Fuchs
Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources (BGR),
30655 Hanover, Germany
Related authors
Nick Schüßler, Jewgenij Torizin, Claudia Gunkel, Karsten Schütze, Lars Tiepolt, Dirk Kuhn, Michael Fuchs, and Steffen Prüfer
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-209, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-209, 2025
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
Short summary
FACA – Fully Automated Co-Alignment – is a tool designed to generate co-aligned point clouds. We aim to accelerate the application of the co-alignment method and achieve fast results with evolving temporal data and minimal site-specific preparation. FACA offers multiple ways to interact with the workflow, enabling new users to quickly generate initial results through the custom interface, as well as integration into larger automated workflows via the command line. Test datasets are provided.
Nick Schüßler, Jewgenij Torizin, Claudia Gunkel, Karsten Schütze, Lars Tiepolt, Dirk Kuhn, Michael Fuchs, and Steffen Prüfer
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-209, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-209, 2025
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
Short summary
FACA – Fully Automated Co-Alignment – is a tool designed to generate co-aligned point clouds. We aim to accelerate the application of the co-alignment method and achieve fast results with evolving temporal data and minimal site-specific preparation. FACA offers multiple ways to interact with the workflow, enabling new users to quickly generate initial results through the custom interface, as well as integration into larger automated workflows via the command line. Test datasets are provided.
Related subject area
Climate and Earth system modeling
Implementing deep soil and dynamic root uptake in Noah-MP (v4.5): impact on Amazon dry-season transpiration
Reducing time and computing costs in EC-Earth: an automatic load-balancing approach for coupled Earth system models
FLAME 1.0: a novel approach for modelling burned area in the Brazilian biomes using the maximum entropy concept
SURFER v3.0: a fast model with ice sheet tipping points and carbon cycle feedbacks for short- and long-term climate scenarios
NMH-CS 3.0: a C# programming language and Windows-system-based ecohydrological model derived from Noah-MP
A method for quantifying uncertainty in spatially interpolated meteorological data with application to daily maximum air temperature
Baseline Climate Variables for Earth System Modelling
PaleoSTeHM v1.0: a modern, scalable spatiotemporal hierarchical modeling framework for paleo-environmental data
The Tropical Basin Interaction Model Intercomparison Project (TBIMIP)
ZEMBA v1.0: an energy and moisture balance climate model to investigate Quaternary climate
Development and evaluation of a new 4DEnVar-based weakly coupled ocean data assimilation system in E3SMv2
TemDeep: a self-supervised framework for temporal downscaling of atmospheric fields at arbitrary time resolutions
The ensemble consistency test: from CESM to MPAS and beyond
Presentation, calibration and testing of the DCESS II Earth system model of intermediate complexity (version 1.0)
Synthesizing global carbon–nitrogen coupling effects – the MAGICC coupled carbon–nitrogen cycle model v1.0
Historical trends and controlling factors of isoprene emissions in CMIP6 Earth system models
Investigating carbon and nitrogen conservation in reported CMIP6 Earth system model data
From weather data to river runoff: using spatiotemporal convolutional networks for discharge forecasting
A Fortran–Python interface for integrating machine learning parameterization into earth system models
ROCKE-3D 2.0: An updated general circulation model for simulating the climates of rocky planets
A rapid-application emissions-to-impacts tool for scenario assessment: Probabilistic Regional Impacts from Model patterns and Emissions (PRIME)
The DOE E3SM version 2.1: overview and assessment of the impacts of parameterized ocean submesoscales
WRF-ELM v1.0: a regional climate model to study land–atmosphere interactions over heterogeneous land use regions
Modeling commercial-scale CO2 storage in the gas hydrate stability zone with PFLOTRAN v6.0
DiuSST: a conceptual model of diurnal warm layers for idealized atmospheric simulations with interactive sea surface temperature
High-Resolution Model Intercomparison Project phase 2 (HighResMIP2) towards CMIP7
T&C-CROP: representing mechanistic crop growth with a terrestrial biosphere model (T&C, v1.5) – model formulation and validation
An updated non-intrusive, multi-scale, and flexible coupling interface in WRF 4.6.0
Monitoring and benchmarking Earth system model simulations with ESMValTool v2.12.0
The Earth Science Box Modeling Toolkit (ESBMTK 0.14.0.11): a Python library for research and teaching
CropSuite v1.0 – a comprehensive open-source crop suitability model considering climate variability for climate impact assessment
ICON ComIn – the ICON Community Interface (ComIn version 0.1.0, with ICON version 2024.01-01)
Using feature importance as an exploratory data analysis tool on Earth system models
A new metrics framework for quantifying and intercomparing atmospheric rivers in observations, reanalyses, and climate models
The real challenges for climate and weather modelling on its way to sustained exascale performance: a case study using ICON (v2.6.6)
COSP-RTTOV-1.0: Flexible radiation diagnostics to enable new science applications in model evaluation, climate change detection, and satellite mission design
Impact of spatial resolution on CMIP6-driven Mediterranean climate simulations: a focus on precipitation distribution over Italy
Improving the representation of major Indian crops in the Community Land Model version 5.0 (CLM5) using site-scale crop data
Evaluation of CORDEX ERA5-forced NARCliM2.0 regional climate models over Australia using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model version 4.1.2
Design, evaluation, and future projections of the NARCliM2.0 CORDEX-CMIP6 Australasia regional climate ensemble
The Detection and Attribution Model Intercomparison Project (DAMIP v2.0) contribution to CMIP7
Statistical summaries for streamed data from climate simulations: One-pass algorithms (v0.6.2)
Amending the algorithm of aerosol–radiation interactions in WRF-Chem (v4.4)
The very-high-resolution configuration of the EC-Earth global model for HighResMIP
GOSI9: UK Global Ocean and Sea Ice configurations
FACA v1 – Fully Automated Co-Alignment of UAV Point Clouds
Decomposition of skill scores for conditional verification: impact of Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation phases on the predictability of decadal temperature forecasts
Virtual Integration of Satellite and In-situ Observation Networks (VISION) v1.0: In-Situ Observations Simulator (ISO_simulator)
Climate model downscaling in central Asia: a dynamical and a neural network approach
Advanced climate model evaluation with ESMValTool v2.11.0 using parallel, out-of-core, and distributed computing
Carolina A. Bieri, Francina Dominguez, Gonzalo Miguez-Macho, and Ying Fan
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 3755–3779, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3755-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3755-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Access to deep moisture below the Earth's surface is important for vegetation in areas of the Amazon where there is little precipitation for part of the year. Most existing numerical models of the Earth system do not adequately capture where and when deep root water uptake occurs. We address this by adding deep soil layers and a root water uptake feature to an existing model. Out modifications lead to increased dry-month transpiration and improved simulation of the annual transpiration cycle.
Sergi Palomas, Mario C. Acosta, Gladys Utrera, and Etienne Tourigny
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 3661–3679, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3661-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3661-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We present an automatic tool that optimizes resource distribution in coupled climate models, enhancing speed and reducing computational costs without requiring expert knowledge. Users can set energy/time criteria or limit resource usage. Tested on various European Community Earth System Model (EC-Earth) configurations and high-performance computing (HPC) platforms, it achieved up to 34 % faster simulations with fewer resources.
Maria Lucia Ferreira Barbosa, Douglas I. Kelley, Chantelle A. Burton, Igor J. M. Ferreira, Renata Moura da Veiga, Anna Bradley, Paulo Guilherme Molin, and Liana O. Anderson
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 3533–3557, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3533-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3533-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
As fire seasons in Brazil become increasingly severe, confidently understanding the factors driving fires is more critical than ever. To address this challenge, we developed FLAME (Fire Landscape Analysis using Maximum Entropy), a new model designed to predict fires and to analyse the spatial influence of both environmental and human factors while accounting for uncertainties. By adapting the model to different regions, we can enhance fire management strategies, making FLAME a powerful tool for protecting landscapes in Brazil and beyond.
Victor Couplet, Marina Martínez Montero, and Michel Crucifix
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 3081–3129, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3081-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3081-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We present SURFER v3.0, a simple climate model designed to estimate the impact of CO2 and CH4 emissions on global temperatures, sea levels, and ocean pH. We added new carbon cycle processes and calibrated the model to observations and results from more complex models, enabling use over timescales ranging from decades to millions of years. SURFER v3.0 is fast, transparent, and easy to use, making it an ideal tool for policy assessments and suitable for educational purposes.
Yong-He Liu and Zong-Liang Yang
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 3157–3174, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3157-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3157-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
NMH-CS 3.0 is a C#-based ecohydrological model reconstructed from the WRF-Hydro/Noah-MP model by translating the Fortran code of WRF-Hydro 3.0 and integrating a parallel river routing module. It enables efficient execution on multi-core personal computers. Simulations in the Yellow River basin demonstrate its consistency with WRF-Hydro outputs, providing a reliable alternative to the original Noah-MP model.
Conor T. Doherty, Weile Wang, Hirofumi Hashimoto, and Ian G. Brosnan
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 3003–3016, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3003-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3003-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We present, analyze, and validate a methodology for quantifying uncertainty in gridded meteorological data products produced by spatial interpolation. In a validation case study using daily maximum near-surface air temperature (Tmax), the method works well and produces predictive distributions with closely matching theoretical versus actual coverage levels. Application of the method reveals that the magnitude of uncertainty in interpolated Tmax varies significantly in both space and time.
Martin Juckes, Karl E. Taylor, Fabrizio Antonio, David Brayshaw, Carlo Buontempo, Jian Cao, Paul J. Durack, Michio Kawamiya, Hyungjun Kim, Tomas Lovato, Chloe Mackallah, Matthew Mizielinski, Alessandra Nuzzo, Martina Stockhause, Daniele Visioni, Jeremy Walton, Briony Turner, Eleanor O'Rourke, and Beth Dingley
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2639–2663, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2639-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2639-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The Baseline Climate Variables for Earth System Modelling (ESM-BCVs) are defined as a list of 135 variables which have high utility for the evaluation and exploitation of climate simulations. The list reflects the most frequently used variables from Earth system models based on an assessment of data publication and download records from the largest archive of global climate projects.
Yucheng Lin, Robert E. Kopp, Alexander Reedy, Matteo Turilli, Shantenu Jha, and Erica L. Ashe
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2609–2637, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2609-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2609-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
PaleoSTeHM v1.0 is a state-of-the-art framework designed to reconstruct past environmental conditions using geological data. Built on modern machine learning techniques, it efficiently handles the sparse and noisy nature of paleo-records, allowing scientists to make accurate and scalable inferences about past environmental change. By using flexible statistical models, PaleoSTeHM separates different sources of uncertainty, improving the precision of historical climate reconstructions.
Ingo Richter, Ping Chang, Ping-Gin Chiu, Gokhan Danabasoglu, Takeshi Doi, Dietmar Dommenget, Guillaume Gastineau, Zoe E. Gillett, Aixue Hu, Takahito Kataoka, Noel S. Keenlyside, Fred Kucharski, Yuko M. Okumura, Wonsun Park, Malte F. Stuecker, Andréa S. Taschetto, Chunzai Wang, Stephen G. Yeager, and Sang-Wook Yeh
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2587–2608, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2587-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2587-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Tropical ocean basins influence each other through multiple pathways and mechanisms, referred to here as tropical basin interaction (TBI). Many researchers have examined TBI using comprehensive climate models but have obtained conflicting results. This may be partly due to differences in experiment protocols and partly due to systematic model errors. The Tropical Basin Interaction Model Intercomparison Project (TBIMIP) aims to address this problem by designing a set of TBI experiments that will be performed by multiple models.
Daniel F. J. Gunning, Kerim H. Nisancioglu, Emilie Capron, and Roderik S. W. van de Wal
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2479–2508, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2479-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2479-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This work documents the first results from ZEMBA: an energy balance model of the climate system. The model is a computationally efficient tool designed to study the response of climate to changes in the Earth's orbit. We demonstrate that ZEMBA reproduces many features of the Earth's climate for both the pre-industrial period and the Earth's most recent cold extreme – the Last Glacial Maximum. We intend to develop ZEMBA further and investigate the glacial cycles of the last 2.5 million years.
Pengfei Shi, L. Ruby Leung, and Bin Wang
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2443–2460, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2443-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2443-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Improving climate predictions has significant socio-economic impacts. In this study, we develop and apply a new weakly coupled ocean data assimilation (WCODA) system to a coupled climate model. The WCODA system improves simulations of ocean temperature and salinity across many global regions. This system is meant to advance our understanding of the ocean's role in climate predictability.
Liwen Wang, Qian Li, Qi Lv, Xuan Peng, and Wei You
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2427–2442, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2427-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2427-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Our research presents a novel deep learning approach called "TemDeep" for downscaling atmospheric variables at arbitrary time resolutions based on temporal coherence. Results show that our method can accurately recover evolution details superior to other methods, reaching 53.7 % in the restoration rate. Our findings are important for advancing weather forecasting models and enabling more precise and reliable predictions to support disaster preparedness, agriculture, and sustainable development.
Teo Price-Broncucia, Allison Baker, Dorit Hammerling, Michael Duda, and Rebecca Morrison
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2349–2372, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2349-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2349-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The ensemble consistency test (ECT) and its ultrafast variant (UF-ECT) have become powerful tools in the development community for the identification of unwanted changes in the Community Earth System Model (CESM). We develop a generalized setup framework to enable easy adoption of the ECT approach for other model developers and communities. This framework specifies test parameters to accurately characterize model variability and balance test sensitivity and computational cost.
Esteban Fernández Villanueva and Gary Shaffer
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2161–2192, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2161-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2161-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We describe, calibrate and test the Danish Center for Earth System Science (DCESS) II model, a new, broad, adaptable and fast Earth system model. DCESS II is designed for global simulations over timescales of years to millions of years using limited computer resources like a personal computer. With its flexibility and comprehensive treatment of the global carbon cycle, DCESS II is a useful, computationally friendly tool for simulations of past climates as well as for future Earth system projections.
Gang Tang, Zebedee Nicholls, Alexander Norton, Sönke Zaehle, and Malte Meinshausen
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2193–2230, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2193-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2193-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We studied carbon–nitrogen coupling in Earth system models by developing a global carbon–nitrogen cycle model (CNit v1.0) within the widely used emulator MAGICC. CNit effectively reproduced the global carbon–nitrogen cycle dynamics observed in complex models. Our results show persistent nitrogen limitations on plant growth (net primary production) from 1850 to 2100, suggesting that nitrogen deficiency may constrain future land carbon sequestration.
Ngoc Thi Nhu Do, Kengo Sudo, Akihiko Ito, Louisa K. Emmons, Vaishali Naik, Kostas Tsigaridis, Øyvind Seland, Gerd A. Folberth, and Douglas I. Kelley
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2079–2109, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2079-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2079-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Understanding historical isoprene emission changes is important for predicting future climate, but trends and their controlling factors remain uncertain. This study shows that long-term isoprene trends vary among Earth system models mainly due to partially incorporating CO2 effects and land cover changes rather than to climate. Future models that refine these factors’ effects on isoprene emissions, along with long-term observations, are essential for better understanding plant–climate interactions.
Gang Tang, Zebedee Nicholls, Chris Jones, Thomas Gasser, Alexander Norton, Tilo Ziehn, Alejandro Romero-Prieto, and Malte Meinshausen
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2111–2136, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2111-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2111-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We analyzed carbon and nitrogen mass conservation in data from various Earth system models. Our findings reveal significant discrepancies between flux and pool size data, where cumulative imbalances can reach hundreds of gigatons of carbon or nitrogen. These imbalances appear primarily due to missing or inconsistently reported fluxes – especially for land-use and fire emissions. To enhance data quality, we recommend that future climate data protocols address this issue at the reporting stage.
Florian Börgel, Sven Karsten, Karoline Rummel, and Ulf Gräwe
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2005–2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2005-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2005-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Forecasting river runoff, which is crucial for managing water resources and understanding climate impacts, can be challenging. This study introduces a new method using convolutional long short-term memory (ConvLSTM) networks, a machine learning model that processes spatial and temporal data. Focusing on the Baltic Sea region, our model uses weather data as input to predict daily river runoff for 97 rivers.
Tao Zhang, Cyril Morcrette, Meng Zhang, Wuyin Lin, Shaocheng Xie, Ye Liu, Kwinten Van Weverberg, and Joana Rodrigues
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1917–1928, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1917-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1917-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Earth system models (ESMs) struggle with the uncertainties associated with parameterizing subgrid physics. Machine learning (ML) algorithms offer a solution by learning the important relationships and features from high-resolution models. To incorporate ML parameterizations into ESMs, we develop a Fortran–Python interface that allows for calling Python functions within Fortran-based ESMs. Through two case studies, this interface demonstrates its feasibility, modularity, and effectiveness.
Kostas Tsigaridis, Andrew S. Ackerman, Igor Aleinov, Mark A. Chandler, Thomas L. Clune, Christopher M. Colose, Anthony D. Del Genio, Maxwell Kelley, Nancy Y. Kiang, Anthony Leboissetier, Jan P. Perlwitz, Reto A. Ruedy, Gary L. Russell, Linda E. Sohl, Michael J. Way, and Eric T. Wolf
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-925, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-925, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We present the second generation of ROCKE-3D, a generalized 3-dimensional model for use in Solar System and exoplanetary simulations of rocky planet climates. We quantify how the different component choices affect model results, and discuss strengths and limitations of using each component, together with how one can select which component to use. ROCKE-3D is publicly available and tutorial sessions are available for the community, greatly facilitating its use by any interested group.
Camilla Mathison, Eleanor J. Burke, Gregory Munday, Chris D. Jones, Chris J. Smith, Norman J. Steinert, Andy J. Wiltshire, Chris Huntingford, Eszter Kovacs, Laila K. Gohar, Rebecca M. Varney, and Douglas McNeall
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1785–1808, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1785-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1785-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We present PRIME (Probabilistic Regional Impacts from Model patterns and Emissions), which is designed to take new emissions scenarios and rapidly provide regional impact information. PRIME allows large ensembles to be run on multi-centennial timescales, including the analysis of many important variables for impact assessments. Our evaluation shows that PRIME reproduces the climate response for known scenarios, providing confidence in using PRIME for novel scenarios.
Katherine M. Smith, Alice M. Barthel, LeAnn M. Conlon, Luke P. Van Roekel, Anthony Bartoletti, Jean-Christophe Golaz, Chengzhu Zhang, Carolyn Branecky Begeman, James J. Benedict, Gautam Bisht, Yan Feng, Walter Hannah, Bryce E. Harrop, Nicole Jeffery, Wuyin Lin, Po-Lun Ma, Mathew E. Maltrud, Mark R. Petersen, Balwinder Singh, Qi Tang, Teklu Tesfa, Jonathan D. Wolfe, Shaocheng Xie, Xue Zheng, Karthik Balaguru, Oluwayemi Garuba, Peter Gleckler, Aixue Hu, Jiwoo Lee, Ben Moore-Maley, and Ana C. Ordoñez
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1613–1633, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1613-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1613-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Version 2.1 of the U.S. Department of Energy's Energy Exascale Earth System Model (E3SM) adds the Fox-Kemper et al. (2011) mixed-layer eddy parameterization, which restratifies the ocean surface layer through an overturning streamfunction. Results include surface layer bias reduction in temperature, salinity, and sea ice extent in the North Atlantic; a small strengthening of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation; and improvements to many atmospheric climatological variables.
Huilin Huang, Yun Qian, Gautam Bisht, Jiali Wang, Tirthankar Chakraborty, Dalei Hao, Jianfeng Li, Travis Thurber, Balwinder Singh, Zhao Yang, Ye Liu, Pengfei Xue, William J. Sacks, Ethan Coon, and Robert Hetland
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1427–1443, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1427-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1427-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We integrate the E3SM Land Model (ELM) with the WRF model through the Lightweight Infrastructure for Land Atmosphere Coupling (LILAC) Earth System Modeling Framework (ESMF). This framework includes a top-level driver, LILAC, for variable communication between WRF and ELM and ESMF caps for ELM initialization, execution, and finalization. The LILAC–ESMF framework maintains the integrity of the ELM's source code structure and facilitates the transfer of future ELM model developments to WRF-ELM.
Michael Nole, Jonah Bartrand, Fawz Naim, and Glenn Hammond
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1413–1425, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1413-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1413-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Safe carbon dioxide (CO2) storage is likely to be critical for mitigating some of the most severe effects of climate change. We present a simulation framework for modeling CO2 storage beneath the seafloor, where CO2 can form a solid. This can aid in permanent CO2 storage for long periods of time. Our models show what a commercial-scale CO2 injection would look like in a marine environment. We discuss what would need to be considered when designing a subsea CO2 injection.
Reyk Börner, Jan O. Haerter, and Romain Fiévet
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1333–1356, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1333-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1333-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The daily cycle of sea surface temperature (SST) impacts clouds above the ocean and could influence the clustering of thunderstorms linked to extreme rainfall and hurricanes. However, daily SST variability is often poorly represented in modeling studies of how clouds cluster. We present a simple, wind-responsive model of upper-ocean temperature for use in atmospheric simulations. Evaluating the model against observations, we show that it performs significantly better than common slab models.
Malcolm J. Roberts, Kevin A. Reed, Qing Bao, Joseph J. Barsugli, Suzana J. Camargo, Louis-Philippe Caron, Ping Chang, Cheng-Ta Chen, Hannah M. Christensen, Gokhan Danabasoglu, Ivy Frenger, Neven S. Fučkar, Shabeh ul Hasson, Helene T. Hewitt, Huanping Huang, Daehyun Kim, Chihiro Kodama, Michael Lai, Lai-Yung Ruby Leung, Ryo Mizuta, Paulo Nobre, Pablo Ortega, Dominique Paquin, Christopher D. Roberts, Enrico Scoccimarro, Jon Seddon, Anne Marie Treguier, Chia-Ying Tu, Paul A. Ullrich, Pier Luigi Vidale, Michael F. Wehner, Colin M. Zarzycki, Bosong Zhang, Wei Zhang, and Ming Zhao
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1307–1332, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1307-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1307-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
HighResMIP2 is a model intercomparison project focusing on high-resolution global climate models, that is, those with grid spacings of 25 km or less in the atmosphere and ocean, using simulations of decades to a century in length. We are proposing an update of our simulation protocol to make the models more applicable to key questions for climate variability and hazard in present-day and future projections and to build links with other communities to provide more robust climate information.
Jordi Buckley Paules, Simone Fatichi, Bonnie Warring, and Athanasios Paschalis
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1287–1305, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1287-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1287-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We present and validate enhancements to the process-based T&C model aimed at improving its representation of crop growth and management practices. The updated model, T&C-CROP, enables applications such as analysing the hydrological and carbon storage impacts of land use transitions (e.g. conversions between crops, forests, and pastures) and optimizing irrigation and fertilization strategies in response to climate change.
Sébastien Masson, Swen Jullien, Eric Maisonnave, David Gill, Guillaume Samson, Mathieu Le Corre, and Lionel Renault
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1241–1263, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1241-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1241-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This article details a new feature we implemented in the popular regional atmospheric model WRF. This feature allows for data exchange between WRF and any other model (e.g. an ocean model) using the coupling library Ocean–Atmosphere–Sea–Ice–Soil Model Coupling Toolkit (OASIS3-MCT). This coupling interface is designed to be non-intrusive, flexible and modular. It also offers the possibility of taking into account the nested zooms used in WRF or in the models with which it is coupled.
Axel Lauer, Lisa Bock, Birgit Hassler, Patrick Jöckel, Lukas Ruhe, and Manuel Schlund
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1169–1188, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1169-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1169-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Earth system models are important tools to improve our understanding of current climate and to project climate change. Thus, it is crucial to understand possible shortcomings in the models. New features of the ESMValTool software package allow one to compare and visualize a model's performance with respect to reproducing observations in the context of other climate models in an easy and user-friendly way. We aim to help model developers assess and monitor climate simulations more efficiently.
Ulrich G. Wortmann, Tina Tsan, Mahrukh Niazi, Irene A. Ma, Ruben Navasardyan, Magnus-Roland Marun, Bernardo S. Chede, Jingwen Zhong, and Morgan Wolfe
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1155–1167, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1155-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1155-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The Earth Science Box Modeling Toolkit (ESBMTK) is a user-friendly Python library that simplifies the creation of models to study earth system processes, such as the carbon cycle and ocean chemistry. It enhances learning by emphasizing concepts over programming and is accessible to students and researchers alike. By automating complex calculations and promoting code clarity, ESBMTK accelerates model development while improving reproducibility and the usability of scientific research.
Florian Zabel, Matthias Knüttel, and Benjamin Poschlod
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1067–1087, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1067-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1067-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
CropSuite is a new open-source crop suitability model. It provides a GUI and a wide range of options, including a spatial downscaling of climate data. We apply CropSuite to 48 staple and opportunity crops at a 1 km spatial resolution in Africa. We find that climate variability significantly impacts suitable areas but also affects optimal sowing dates and multiple cropping potential. The results provide valuable information for climate impact assessments, adaptation, and land-use planning.
Kerstin Hartung, Bastian Kern, Nils-Arne Dreier, Jörn Geisbüsch, Mahnoosh Haghighatnasab, Patrick Jöckel, Astrid Kerkweg, Wilton Jaciel Loch, Florian Prill, and Daniel Rieger
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1001–1015, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1001-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1001-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The ICOsahedral Non-hydrostatic (ICON) model system Community Interface (ComIn) library supports connecting third-party modules to the ICON model. Third-party modules can range from simple diagnostic Python scripts to full chemistry models. ComIn offers a low barrier for code extensions to ICON, provides multi-language support (Fortran, C/C++, and Python), and reduces the migration effort in response to new ICON releases. This paper presents the ComIn design principles and a range of use cases.
Daniel Ries, Katherine Goode, Kellie McClernon, and Benjamin Hillman
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1041–1065, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1041-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1041-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Machine learning has advanced research in the climate science domain, but its models are difficult to understand. In order to understand the impacts and consequences of climate interventions such as stratospheric aerosol injection, complex models are often necessary. We use a case study to illustrate how we can understand the inner workings of a complex model. We present this technique as an exploratory tool that can be used to quickly discover and assess relationships in complex climate data.
Bo Dong, Paul Ullrich, Jiwoo Lee, Peter Gleckler, Kristin Chang, and Travis A. O'Brien
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 961–976, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-961-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-961-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
A metrics package designed for easy analysis of atmospheric river (AR) characteristics and statistics is presented. The tool is efficient for diagnosing systematic AR bias in climate models and useful for evaluating new AR characteristics in model simulations. In climate models, landfalling AR precipitation shows dry biases globally, and AR tracks are farther poleward (equatorward) in the North and South Atlantic (South Pacific and Indian Ocean).
Panagiotis Adamidis, Erik Pfister, Hendryk Bockelmann, Dominik Zobel, Jens-Olaf Beismann, and Marek Jacob
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 905–919, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-905-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-905-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
In this paper, we investigated performance indicators of the climate model ICON (ICOsahedral Nonhydrostatic) on different compute architectures to answer the question of how to generate high-resolution climate simulations. Evidently, it is not enough to use more computing units of the conventionally used architectures; higher memory throughput is the most promising approach. More potential can be gained from single-node optimization rather than simply increasing the number of compute nodes.
Jonah K. Shaw, Dustin J. Swales, Sergio DeSouza-Machado, David D. Turner, Jennifer E. Kay, and David P. Schneider
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-169, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-169, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Satellites have observed earth's emission of infrared radiation since the 1970s. Because infrared wavelengths interact with the atmosphere in distinct ways, these observations contain information about the earth and atmosphere. We present a tool that runs alongside global climate models and produces output that can be directly compared with satellite measurements of infrared radiation. We then use this tool for climate model evaluation, climate change detection, and satellite mission design.
Maria Vittoria Struglia, Alessandro Anav, Marta Antonelli, Sandro Calmanti, Franco Catalano, Alessandro Dell'Aquila, Emanuela Pichelli, and Giovanna Pisacane
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-387, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-387, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We present the results of downscaling global climate projections for the Mediterranean and Italian regions aiming to produce high-resolution climate information for the assessment of climate change signals, focusing on extreme events. A general warming is foreseen by the end of century with a mean precipitation reduction accompanied, over Italian Peninsula, by a strong increase in the intensity of extreme precipitation events, particularly relevant for the high emissions scenario during autumn
Kangari Narender Reddy, Somnath Baidya Roy, Sam S. Rabin, Danica L. Lombardozzi, Gudimetla Venkateswara Varma, Ruchira Biswas, and Devavat Chiru Naik
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 763–785, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-763-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-763-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The study aimed to improve the representation of wheat and rice in a land model for the Indian region. The modified model performed significantly better than the default model in simulating crop phenology, yield, and carbon, water, and energy fluxes compared to observations. The study highlights the need for global land models to use region-specific crop parameters for accurately simulating vegetation processes and land surface processes.
Giovanni Di Virgilio, Fei Ji, Eugene Tam, Jason P. Evans, Jatin Kala, Julia Andrys, Christopher Thomas, Dipayan Choudhury, Carlos Rocha, Yue Li, and Matthew L. Riley
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 703–724, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-703-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-703-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We evaluate the skill in simulating the Australian climate of some of the latest generation of regional climate models. We show when and where the models simulate this climate with high skill versus model limitations. We show how new models perform relative to the previous-generation models, assessing how model design features may underlie key performance improvements. This work is of national and international relevance as it can help guide the use and interpretation of climate projections.
Giovanni Di Virgilio, Jason P. Evans, Fei Ji, Eugene Tam, Jatin Kala, Julia Andrys, Christopher Thomas, Dipayan Choudhury, Carlos Rocha, Stephen White, Yue Li, Moutassem El Rafei, Rishav Goyal, Matthew L. Riley, and Jyothi Lingala
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 671–702, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-671-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-671-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We introduce new climate models that simulate Australia’s future climate at regional scales, including at an unprecedented resolution of 4 km for 1950–2100. We describe the model design process used to create these new climate models. We show how the new models perform relative to previous-generation models and compare their climate projections. This work is of national and international relevance as it can help guide climate model design and the use and interpretation of climate projections.
Nathan P. Gillett, Isla R. Simpson, Gabi Hegerl, Reto Knutti, Dann Mitchell, Aurélien Ribes, Hideo Shiogama, Dáithí Stone, Claudia Tebaldi, Piotr Wolski, Wenxia Zhang, and Vivek K. Arora
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-4086, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-4086, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Climate model simulations of the response to human and natural influences together, natural climate influences alone, and greenhouse gases alone, among others, are key to quantifying human influence on the climate. The last set of such coordinated simulations underpinned key findings in the last Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report. Here we propose a new set of such simulations to be used in the next generation of attribution studies, and to underpin the next IPCC report.
Katherine Grayson, Stephan Thober, Aleksander Lacima-Nadolnik, Ehsan Sharifi, Llorenç Lledó, and Francisco Doblas-Reyes
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-28, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-28, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
To provide the most accurate climate adaptation information, climate models are being run with finer grid resolution, resulting in larger data output. This paper presents intelligent data reduction algorithms that act on streamed data, a novel way of processing climate data as soon as it is produced. Using these algorithms to calculate statistics, we show that the accuracy provided is well within acceptable bounds while still providing memory savings that bypass unfeasible storage requirements.
Jiawang Feng, Chun Zhao, Qiuyan Du, Zining Yang, and Chen Jin
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 585–603, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-585-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-585-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, we improved the calculation of how aerosols in the air interact with radiation in WRF-Chem. The original model used a simplified method, but we developed a more accurate approach. We found that this method significantly changes the properties of the estimated aerosols and their effects on radiation, especially for dust aerosols. It also impacts the simulated weather conditions. Our work highlights the importance of correctly representing aerosol–radiation interactions in models.
Eduardo Moreno-Chamarro, Thomas Arsouze, Mario Acosta, Pierre-Antoine Bretonnière, Miguel Castrillo, Eric Ferrer, Amanda Frigola, Daria Kuznetsova, Eneko Martin-Martinez, Pablo Ortega, and Sergi Palomas
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 461–482, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-461-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-461-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We present the high-resolution model version of the EC-Earth global climate model to contribute to HighResMIP. The combined model resolution is about 10–15 km in both the ocean and atmosphere, which makes it one of the finest ever used to complete historical and scenario simulations. This model is compared with two lower-resolution versions, with a 100 km and a 25 km grid. The three models are compared with observations to study the improvements thanks to the increased resolution.
Catherine Guiavarc'h, David Storkey, Adam T. Blaker, Ed Blockley, Alex Megann, Helene Hewitt, Michael J. Bell, Daley Calvert, Dan Copsey, Bablu Sinha, Sophia Moreton, Pierre Mathiot, and Bo An
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 377–403, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-377-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-377-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The Global Ocean and Sea Ice configuration version 9 (GOSI9) is the new UK hierarchy of model configurations based on the Nucleus for European Modelling of the Ocean (NEMO) and available at three resolutions. It will be used for various applications, e.g. weather forecasting and climate prediction. It improves upon the previous version by reducing global temperature and salinity biases and enhancing the representation of Arctic sea ice and the Antarctic Circumpolar Current.
Nick Schüßler, Jewgenij Torizin, Claudia Gunkel, Karsten Schütze, Lars Tiepolt, Dirk Kuhn, Michael Fuchs, and Steffen Prüfer
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-209, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-209, 2025
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
Short summary
FACA – Fully Automated Co-Alignment – is a tool designed to generate co-aligned point clouds. We aim to accelerate the application of the co-alignment method and achieve fast results with evolving temporal data and minimal site-specific preparation. FACA offers multiple ways to interact with the workflow, enabling new users to quickly generate initial results through the custom interface, as well as integration into larger automated workflows via the command line. Test datasets are provided.
Andy Richling, Jens Grieger, and Henning W. Rust
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 361–375, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-361-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-361-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The performance of weather and climate prediction systems is variable in time and space. It is of interest how this performance varies in different situations. We provide a decomposition of a skill score (a measure of forecast performance) as a tool for detailed assessment of performance variability to support model development or forecast improvement. The framework is exemplified with decadal forecasts to assess the impact of different ocean states in the North Atlantic on temperature forecast.
Maria R. Russo, Sadie L. Bartholomew, David Hassell, Alex M. Mason, Erica Neininger, A. James Perman, David A. J. Sproson, Duncan Watson-Parris, and Nathan Luke Abraham
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 181–191, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-181-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-181-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Observational data and modelling capabilities have expanded in recent years, but there are still barriers preventing these two data sources from being used in synergy. Proper comparison requires generating, storing, and handling a large amount of data. This work describes the first step in the development of a new set of software tools, the VISION toolkit, which can enable the easy and efficient integration of observational and model data required for model evaluation.
Bijan Fallah, Masoud Rostami, Emmanuele Russo, Paula Harder, Christoph Menz, Peter Hoffmann, Iulii Didovets, and Fred F. Hattermann
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 161–180, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-161-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-161-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We tried to contribute to a local climate change impact study in central Asia, a region that is water-scarce and vulnerable to global climate change. We use regional models and machine learning to produce reliable local data from global climate models. We find that regional models show more realistic and detailed changes in heavy precipitation than global climate models. Our work can help assess the future risks of extreme events and plan adaptation strategies in central Asia.
Manuel Schlund, Bouwe Andela, Jörg Benke, Ruth Comer, Birgit Hassler, Emma Hogan, Peter Kalverla, Axel Lauer, Bill Little, Saskia Loosveldt Tomas, Francesco Nattino, Patrick Peglar, Valeriu Predoi, Stef Smeets, Stephen Worsley, Martin Yeo, and Klaus Zimmermann
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-236, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-236, 2025
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
Short summary
The Earth System Model Evaluation Tool (ESMValTool) is a community diagnostics and performance metrics tool for the evaluation of Earth system models. Here, we describe recent significant improvements of ESMValTool’s computational efficiency including parallel, out-of-core, and distributed computing. Evaluations with the enhanced version of ESMValTool are faster, use less computational resources, and can handle input data larger than the available memory.
Cited articles
Agterberg, F. P. and Cheng, Q.: Conditional independence Test for
Weight-of-Evidence Modeling, Nat. Resour. Res., 11, 249–255,
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021193827501, 2002.
Aleotti, P. and Chowdhury, R.: Landslide hazard assessment: summary review
and new perspectives, Bull. Eng. Geol. Envir., 58, 21–44,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s100640050066, 1999.
Alimohammadlou, Y., Najafi, A., and Gokceoglu, C.: Estimation of
rainfall-induced landslides using ANN and fuzzy clustering methods: A case
study in Saeen Slope, Azerbaijan province, Iran. Catena, 120, 149–162,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2014.04.009, 2014.
Balzer, D., Dommaschk, P., Ehret, D., Fuchs, M., Glaser, S., Henscheid, S.,
Kuhn, D., Strauß, R., Torizin, J., and Wiedenmann, J.: Massenbewegungen
in Deutschland (MBiD) – Beiträge zur Modellierung der
Hangrutschungsempfindlichkeit. Ein Kooperationsprojekt zwischen den
Staatlichen Geologischen Diensten der Bundesländer
Baden-Württemberg, Bayern, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Sachsen und der
Bundesanstalt für Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe im Auftrag des
Direktorenkreises der Staatlichen Geologischen Dienste in Deutschland,
Abschlussbericht, Augsburg, Freiberg, Freiburg, Hannover und Krefeld, https://www.bgr.bund.de/DE/Themen/Erdbeben-Gefaehrdungsanalysen/Downloads/igga_mbid_abschlussbericht.html?nn=1542304 (last access: 31 March 2022), 2020.
Barbieri, G. and Cambuli, P.: The weight of evidence statistical method in
landslide susceptibility mapping 424 of the Rio Pardu Valley (Sardinia,
Italy), 18th World IMACS/MODSIM Congress, Cairns, Australia, 2009.
Bonham-Carter, G. F.: Geographic information systems for geoscientists:
Modelling with GIS, Pergamon Press, Ottawa, https://doi.org/10.1016/C2013-0-03864-9, 1994.
Bonham-Carter, G. F., Agterberg, F. P., and Wright, D. F.: Weights of
evidence modelling: a new approach to mapping mineral potential, Stat. Appl.
Earth. Sci. Geol. Survey Can. Paper, 89–9, 171–183, 1989.
Bouziat, A., Schmitz, J., Deschamps, R., and Labat, K.: Digital
transformation and geoscience education: New tools to learn, new skills to
grow, European Geologist, 50, 15–19, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4311379, 2020
Brabb, E. E.: Innovative approaches to landslide hazard and risk
mapping, Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Landslides,
Toronto, 1, 307–324, 1985.
Bragagnolo, L., da Silva, R. V., and Grzybowski, J. M. V.: Artificial neural
network ensembles applied to the mapping of landslide susceptibility,
Catena, 184, 104240, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2019.104240, 2020a.
Bragagnolo, L., da Silva, R. V., and Grzybowski, J. M. V.: Landslide
susceptibility mapping with r.landslide: A free open-source GIS-integrated
tool based on Artificial Neural Networks, Environ. Model.
Softw., 123, 104565, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.104565, 2020b.
Brenning, A.: Statistical geocomputing combining R and SAGA: The example of
landslide susceptibility analysis with generalized additive models, in: SAGA – Seconds Out (=
Hamburger Beitraege zur Physischen Geographie und Landschaftsoekologie, edited by:
Boehner, J., Blaschke, T., and Montanarella, L., vol.
19), 23–32, 2008.
Budimir, M. E. A., Atkinson, P. M., and Lewis, H. G.: A systematic review of
landslide probability mapping using logistic
regression, Landslides, 12, 419–436,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-014-0550-5, 2015.
Buitinck, L., Louppe, G., Blondel, M., Pedregosa, F., Mueller, A., Grisel,
O., Niculae, V., Prettenhofer, P., Gramfort, A., Grobler, J., Layton, R.,
VanderPlas, J., Joly, A., Holt, B., and Varoquaux, G.: API design for machine
learning software: experiences from the scikit-learn project, ECML PKDD
Workshop: Languages for Data Mining and Machine Learning, 23 to 27 September, Prague, 108–122,
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1309.0238, 2013.
Calkins, J. A., Offield, T. W., Abdullah, S. K. M., and Ali, T.: Geology of
the Southern Himalaya in Hazara, Pakistan, and Adjacent Areas. Geological
Survey Professional Paper 716-C, United States Government Printing Office,
Washington, U.S. Govt. Print. Off.,
https://doi.org/10.3133/pp716C, 1975.
Canny, S.: python-docx – A Python library for creating and updating
Microsoft Word (.docx) files,
https://pypi.org/project/python-docx, last access: 4 May 2018.
Chung, C.-J. and Fabbri, A. G.: Validation of spatial prediction models for
landslide hazard mapping, Nat. Hazards, 30, 451–472, 2003.
Chung, C.-J. and Fabbri, A. G.: Predicting landslides for risk analysis –
Spatial models tested by a cross-validation technique, Geomorphology,
94, 438–452, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.12.036, 2008.
Crozier, M. J.: Deciphering the effect of climate change on landslide
activity: A review, Geomorphology, 124, 260–268,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2010.04.009, 2010.
Egan, K.: Myanmar_Landslide_Models, GitHub [code],
https://github.com/katharineegan/Myanmar_Landslide_Models, last access: 17 December 2021.
Ermini, L., Catani, F., and Casagli, N.: Artificial Neural Networks applied
to landslide susceptibility assessment, Geomorphology, 66, 327–343,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2004.09.025, 2005.
Fawcett, T.: An introduction to ROC analysis, Pattern Recogn. Lett., 27,
861–874, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2005.10.010, 2006.
Froude, M. J. and Petley, D. N.: Global fatal landslide occurrence from 2004 to 2016, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 2161–2181, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-2161-2018, 2018.
Fuchs, M. and Khalid, N.: Land Cover Map for the Districts of Mansehra &
Torghar, Province Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Islamic Republic of Pakistan, Final
Report, 44 p., Islamabad/Hannover, https://zsn.bgr.de/mapapps4/resources/apps/zsn/index.html?lang=de¢er=8738580.027271974%2C2528672.44753847%2C3857&lod=4&itemid=LAFtPD4i3WpmghNb&search=105338 (last access: 31 March 2022), 2015.
Gazoni, E. and Clark, C.: openpyxl – A Python library to read/write Excel
2010 xlsx/xlsm files, https://openpyxl.readthedocs.io, last access: 11 June 2018.
GDAL/OGR contributors: GDAL/OGR Geospatial Data Abstraction software
Library, Open Source Geospatial Foundation, https://gdal.org (last access: 30 March 2022), 2021.
Georisk Assessment Northern Pakistan: BGR-EGHA/LSAT-TestData: LSAT- PMS – TestData (1.0.0), Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5109620, 2021.
GRASS Development Team: Geographic Resources Analysis Support System (GRASS)
Software, Version 7.2.1 Open Source Geospatial Foundation,
http://grass.osgeo.org (last access: 31 March 2022), 2021.
Guzzetti, F., Carrara, A., Cardinali, M., and Reichenbach, P.: Landslide
hazard evaluation: a review of current techniques and their application in a
multi-scale study, Central Italy, Geomorphology, 31, 181–216,
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0169-555x(99)00078-1, 1999.
Guzzetti, F., Reichenbach, P., Cardinali, M., Galli, M., and Ardizzone, F.:
Probabilistic landslide hazard assessment at the basin scale, Geomorphology,
72, 272–299, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2005.06.002, 2005.
Hall-Wallace, M. K.: Integrating Computing Across a Geosciences Curriculum
Through an Applications Course, J. Geosci. Educ., 47,
119–123, https://doi.org/10.5408/1089-9995-47.2.119, 1999.
Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., Gommers, R., Virtanen, P.,
Cournapeau, D., Wieser, E., Taylor, J., Berg, S., Smith, N. J., Picus, M.,
Hoyer, S., van Kerkwijk, M. H., Brett, M., Haldane, A., Fernández del
Río, J., Wiebe, M., Peterson, P., Gérard-Marchant, P., Sheppard,
K., Reddy, T., Weckesser, W., Abbasi, H., Gohlke, C., and Oliphant, T.
E.: Array programming with NumPy, Nature, 585, 357–362,
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2, 2020.
Hernández-Blanco, A., Herrera-Flores, B., Tomás, D., and
Navarro-Colorado, B.: A Systematic Review of Deep Learning Approaches to
Educational Data Mining, Complexity, 2019, 1306039,
https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/1306039, 2019.
Hunter, J. D.: Matplotlib: A 2D graphics environment, Comput. Sci. Eng., 9, 90–95, https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2007.55, 2007.
JAXA: ALOS Global DSM AW3D30 Dataset Product Format Description for V 1.1,
http://www.eorc.jaxa.jp/ALOS/en/aw3d30/aw3d30v11_format_e.pdf (last access: 31 March 2022), 2017.
Jebur, M. N., Pradhan, B., Shafri, H. Z. M., Yusoff, Z. M., and Tehrany, M. S.: An integrated user-friendly ArcMAP tool for bivariate statistical modelling in geoscience applications, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 881–891, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-881-2015, 2015.
Kamp, U., Growley, B. J., Khattak, G. A., and Owen, L. A.: GIS-based
landslide susceptibility mapping for the 2005 Kashmir earthquake region,
Geomorphology, 101, 631–642, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2008.03.003,
2008.
Kamp, U., Owen, L. A., Growley, B. J., and Khattak, G. A.: Back analysis of
landslide susceptibility zonation mapping for the 2005 Kashmir earthquake:
an assessment of the reliability of susceptibility zoning maps, Nat.
Hazards, 54, 1–25, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-009-9451-7, 2010.
Keefer, D. K.: Investigating Landslides Caused by Earthquakes – A
Historical Review, Surv. Geophys., 23, 473–510,
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021274710840, 2002.
Lee, S.: Application of logistic regression model and its validation for
landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS and remote sensing data,
Int. J. Remote Sens., 26, 1477–1491,
https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160412331331012, 2005.
Lee, S. and Evangelista, D. G.: Earthquake-induced landslide-susceptibility mapping using an artificial neural network, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 6, 687–695, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-6-687-2006, 2006.
Lombardo, L. and Mai, M. P.: Presenting logistic regression-based landslide
susceptibility results, Eng. Geol., 244, 14–24,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.07.019, 2018.
Makkawi, M. H., Hariri, M. M., and Ghaleb, A. R.: Computer Utilization in
Teaching Earth Sciences: Experience of King Fahd University of Petroleum and
Minerals, Int. Educ. J., 4, 89–97, 2003.
Mathew, J., Jha, V. K., and Rawat, G. S.: Weights of evidence modelling for
landslide hazard zonation mapping of Bhagirathi Valley, Uttarakhand, Current
Sci., 92, 628–638, 2007.
Merghadi, A.: An R Project for landslide susceptibility mapping in Mila
basin (v1.1.0), Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1000431, 2018.
Merghadi, A.: An R Project for landslide susceptibility mapping in Sihjhong
basin, Taiwan (1.0.0), Zenodo [code],
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3238689, 2019.
Miller, G. A.: The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on
Our Capacity for Processing Information, The Psychological Review, 63,
81–97, https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043158, 1956.
Moghaddam, M. H. R., Khayyam, M., Ahmadi, M., and Farajzadeh, M.: Mapping
susceptibility Landslide by using Weight-of Evidence Model: A case study in
Merek Valley, Iran, J. Appl. Sci., 7, 3342–3355,
https://doi.org/10.3923/jas.2007.3342.3355, 2007.
Neuhäuser, B., Damm, B., and Terhorst, B.: GIS-based assessment of
landslide susceptibility on the base of the Weights-of-Evidence model,
Landslides, 9, 511–528, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-011-0305-5, 2012.
Osna, T., Sezer, E. A., and Akgun, A.: GeoFIS: an integrated tool for the
assessment of landslide susceptibility, Comput. Geosci., 66, 20–30,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2013.12.016, 2014.
Panchal, S. and Shrivastava, A. K.: Application of analytic hierarchy
process in landslide susceptibility mapping at regional scale in GIS
environment, J. Statist. Manag. Syst., 23, 199–206,
https://doi.org/10.1080/09720510.2020.1724620, 2020.
Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel,
O., Blondel, M., Prettenhofer, P., Weiss, R., Dubourg, V., Vanderplas, J.,
Passos, A., Cournapeau, D., Brucher, M., Perrot, M., and Duchesnay, E.:
Scikit-Learn: Machine Learning in Python, J. Mach. Learn.
Res., 12, 2825–2830, 2011.
Petley, D.: Global patterns of loss of life from landslides, Geology, 40,
927–930, https://doi.org/10.1130/G33217.1, 2012.
Petschko, H., Brenning, A., Bell, R., Goetz, J., and Glade, T.: Assessing the quality of landslide susceptibility maps – case study Lower Austria, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 95–118, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-95-2014, 2014.
Polat, A.: An innovative, fast method for landslide susceptibility mapping
using GIS-based LSAT toolbox, Environ. Earth Sci., 80, 217,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-021-09511-y, 2021.
Polemio, M. and Petrucci, O.: Rainfall as a Landslide Triggering Factor: an
overview of recent international research, in: Landslides in Research, Theory
and Practice: Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Landslides, edited by:
Bromhead, E., Dixon, N., Ibsen, M.-L., Thomas Telford, London, UK,
1219–1226, http://hdl.handle.net/2122/7936 (last access: 5 April 2022), 2000.
Pradhan, B. and Lee, S.: Landslide susceptibility assessment, and factor
effect analysis: back propagation artificial neural networks and their
comparison with frequency ratio and bivariate logistic regression modelling,
Environ. Model. Softw., 25, 747–759,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2009.10.016, 2010.
QGIS Development
Team: QGIS Geographic Information System, QGIS Association, http://www.qgis.org (last access: 31 March 2022), 2022.
Raffa, M.: Shallow landslide susceptibility analysis using Random Forest method
in Val D”Aosta D'Aosta Valley, GitHub [code],
https://github.com/MattiaRaffa/RF-VDA-landslide-map, last access: 17.
December 2021.
R Core Team: R: A language and environment for statistical computing, R
Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, ISBN 3-900051-07-0,
http://www.R-project.org/ (last access: 31 March 2022), 2013.
Reichenbach, P., Rossi, M., Malamud, B. D., Mihir, M., and Guzzetti, F.: A
review of statistically-based landslide susceptibility models, Earth Sci.
Rev., 180, 60–91, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.03.001, 2018.
Rossi, M. and Reichenbach, P.: LAND-SE: a software for statistically based landslide susceptibility zonation, version 1.0, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 3533–3543, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3533-2016, 2016.
Rossi, P. H., Guzzetti, F., Reichenbach, P., Mondini, A. C., and Perruccacci,
S.: Optimal landslide susceptibility zonation based on multiple forecasts,
Geomorphology, 114, 129–142,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2009.06.020, 2010.
Saaty, T. L.: A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures,
J. Math. Psychol., 15, 234–281, 1977.
Saaty, T. L.: The analytic hierarchy process, McGraw-Hill, New York, ISBN-13 978-0070543713, 1980.
Sahin, E. K., Colkesen, I., Acmali, S. S., Akgun, A., and Aydinoglu, A. C.:
Developing comprehensive geocomputation tools for landslide susceptibility
mapping: LSM tool pack, Comput. Geosci.,
104592, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2020.104592, 2020.
Schmidhuber, J.: Deep Learning in neural networks: An overview, Neural
Networks, 61, 85–117, 2015.
Senger, K., Betlem, P., Grundvåg, S.-A., Horota, R. K., Buckley, S. J., Smyrak-Sikora, A., Jochmann, M. M., Birchall, T., Janocha, J., Ogata, K., Kuckero, L., Johannessen, R. M., Lecomte, I., Cohen, S. M., and Olaussen, S.: Teaching with digital geology in the high Arctic: opportunities and challenges, Geosci. Commun., 4, 399–420, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-4-399-2021, 2021.
Tanyaş, H., Allstadt, K. E., and van Westen, C. J.: An updated method for
estimating landslide-event magnitude, Earth Surf. Process. Landf.,
43, 1836–1847, https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4359, 2018.
Teerarungsigul, S., Torizin, J., Fuchs, M., Kühn, F., and Chonglakmani,
C.: An integrative approach for regional landslide susceptibility assessment
using weight of evidence method: a case study of Yom River Basin, Phrae
Province, Northern Thailand, Landslides, 13, 1151–1165,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-015-0659-1, 2015.
Thiery, Y., Malet, J.-P., Sterlacchini, S., Puissant, A., and Maquaire, O.:
Landslide susceptibility assessment by bivariate methods at large scales:
Application to a complex mountainous environment, Geomorphology, 92,
38–59, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2007.02.020, 2007.
Tian, T., Balzer, D., Wang, L., Torizin, J., Wan, L., Li, X., Chen, L., Li,
A., Kuhn, D., Fuchs, M., Lege, T., and Tong, B.: Landslide hazard and risk
assessment Lanzhou, province Gansu, China – Project introduction and
outlook, in: Advancing
culture of living with landslides, edited by: Mikoš, M., Tiwari, B., Yin, Y., and Sassa, K., WLF 2017, Springer, Cham, 1027–1033,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53498-5_116, 2017.
Titti, G., Sarretta, A., and Lombardo, L.: CNR-IRPI-Padova/SZ: SZ plugin
(v1.0), Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5693351, 2021.
Torizin, J.: Landslide Susceptibility Assessment Tools for ArcGIS 10 and
their Application, in: Proceedings of 34th IGC, 5–10 August 2012, Brisbane,
730, ISBN 978-0-646-57800-2, 2012.
Torizin, J.: Elimination of informational redundancy in the weight of
evidence method: An application to landslide susceptibility assessment,
Stoch. Env. Res. Risk A., 30, 635–651,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-015-1077-6, 2016.
Torizin, J. and Schüßler, N.: BGR-EGHA/LSAT: LSAT PM v1.0.0b2 (1.0.0b2), Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5909726, 2022a.
Torizin, J. and Schüßler, N.: BGR-EGHA/LSAT-Documentation: LSAT PM v1.0.0b2 - Documentation (1.0.0b2), Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5909744, 2022b.
Torizin, J. and Schüßler, N.: Python scripts to plot figures in LSAT PM article, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5913626, 2022c.
Torizin, J., Fuchs, M., Balzer, D., Kuhn, D., Arifianti, Y., and Kusnadi:
Methods for generation and evaluation of landslide susceptibility maps: a
case study of Lombok Island, Indonesia, Proceedings of 19th Conference on
Engineering Geology, Munich, 253–258, 2013.
Torizin, J., Fuchs, M., Awan, A. A., Ahmad, I., Akhtar, S. S., Sadiq, S.,
Razzak, A., Weggenmann, D., Fawad, F., Khalid, N., Sabir, F., and Khan, A.
H.: Statistical landslide susceptibility assessment of the Mansehra and
Thorgar districts, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Province, Pakistan, Nat. Hazards,
89, 757–784, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-2992-2, 2017.
Torizin, J., Wang, L. C., Fuchs, M., Tong, B., Balzer, D., Wan, L., Kuhn,
D., Li, A., and Chen, L.: Statistical landslide susceptibility assessment in
a dynamic environment: A case study for Lanzhou City, Gansu Province, NW
China, J. Mt. Sci., 15, 1299–1318,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-017-4717-0, 2018.
Torizin, J., Fuchs, M., Kuhn, D., Balzer, D., and Wang, L.: Practical
Accounting for Uncertainties in Data-Driven Landslide Susceptibility Models.
Examples from the Lanzhou Case Study, in: Understanding
and Reducing Landslide Disaster Risk, edited by: Guzzetti, F., Mihalić, Arbanas,
S., Reichenbach, P., Sassa, K., Bobrowsky, P. T., and Takara, K., WLF 2020, ICL Contribution to
Landslide Disaster Risk Reduction, Springer, Cham,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60227-7_27, 2021.
Van Rossum, G. and Drake, F. L.: Python 3 Reference Manual, CreateSpace, Scotts Valley,
CA, ISBN 978-1-4414-1269-0, 2009.
Van Westen, C., Van Asch, T. W., and Soeters, R.: Landslide hazard and risk
zonation – why is it still so difficult?, B. Eng. Geol.
Environ., 65, 167–184, 2006.
Van Westen, C. J., Castellanos Abella, E. A., and Sekhar, L. K.: Spatial data
for landslide susceptibility, hazards and vulnerability assessment: an
overview, Eng. Geol., 102, 112–131,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2008.03.010, 2008.
Varnes, D. J.: Landslide hazard zonation: a review of principles and
practice, Natural Hazards, 3, UNESCO, Paris, 63 pp., ISBN 978-92-3-101895-4, 1984.
Xu, Y. and Goodacre, R.: On Splitting Training and Validation Set: A
Comparative Study of Cross-Validation, Bootstrap and Systematic Sampling for
Estimating the Generalization Performance of Supervised Learning, J. Anal.
Test., 2, 249–262, https://doi.org/10.1007/s41664-018-0068-2, 2018.
Short summary
With LSAT PM we introduce an open-source, stand-alone, easy-to-use application that supports scientific principles of openness, knowledge integrity, and replicability. Doing so, we want to share our experience in the implementation of heuristic and data-driven landslide susceptibility assessment methods such as analytic hierarchy process, weights of evidence, logistic regression, and artificial neural networks. A test dataset is available.
With LSAT PM we introduce an open-source, stand-alone, easy-to-use application that supports...
