Articles | Volume 14, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-223-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-223-2021
Model experiment description paper
 | 
15 Jan 2021
Model experiment description paper |  | 15 Jan 2021

Numerical study of the effects of initial conditions and emissions on PM2.5 concentration simulations with CAMx v6.1: a Xi'an case study

Han Xiao, Qizhong Wu, Xiaochun Yang, Lanning Wang, and Huaqiong Cheng

Related authors

GPU-HADVPPM4HIP V1.0: higher model accuracy on China's domestically GPU-like accelerator using heterogeneous compute interface for portability (HIP) technology to accelerate the piecewise parabolic method (PPM) in an air quality model (CAMx V6.10)
Kai Cao, Qizhong Wu, Lingling Wang, Hengliang Guo, Nan Wang, Huaqiong Cheng, Xiao Tang, Lina Liu, Dongqing Li, Hao Wu, and Lanning Wang
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2023-222,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2023-222, 2024
Preprint under review for GMD
Short summary
Application of regional meteorology and air quality models based on MIPS CPU Platform
Zehua Bai, Qizhong Wu, Kai Cao, Yiming Sun, and Huaqiong Cheng
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2962,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2962, 2024
Short summary
Changes of air pollutant emissions in China during two clean air action periods derived from the newly developed Inversed Emission Inventory for Chinese Air Quality (CAQIEI)
Lei Kong, Xiao Tang, Zifa Wang, Jiang Zhu, Jianjun Li, Huangjian Wu, Qizhong Wu, Huansheng Chen, Lili Zhu, Wei Wang, Bing Liu, Qian Wang, Duohong Chen, Yuepeng Pan, Jie Li, Lin Wu, and Gregory R. Carmichael
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2023-477,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2023-477, 2023
Revised manuscript under review for ESSD
Short summary
A sub-grid parameterization scheme for topographic vertical motion in CAM5-SE
Yaqi Wang, Lanning Wang, Juan Feng, Zhenya Song, Qizhong Wu, and Huaqiong Cheng
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 6857–6873, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6857-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6857-2023, 2023
Short summary
Surrogate model-based precipitation tuning for CAM5
Xianwei Wu, Liang Hu, Lanning Wang, Haitian Lu, and Juepeng Zheng
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2023-164,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2023-164, 2023
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary

Related subject area

Atmospheric sciences
Modelling wind farm effects in HARMONIE–AROME (cycle 43.2.2) – Part 1: Implementation and evaluation
Jana Fischereit, Henrik Vedel, Xiaoli Guo Larsén, Natalie E. Theeuwes, Gregor Giebel, and Eigil Kaas
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2855–2875, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2855-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2855-2024, 2024
Short summary
Analytical and adaptable initial conditions for dry and moist baroclinic waves in the global hydrostatic model OpenIFS (CY43R3)
Clément Bouvier, Daan van den Broek, Madeleine Ekblom, and Victoria A. Sinclair
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2961–2986, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2961-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2961-2024, 2024
Short summary
Challenges of constructing and selecting the “perfect” boundary conditions for the large-eddy simulation model PALM
Jelena Radović, Michal Belda, Jaroslav Resler, Kryštof Eben, Martin Bureš, Jan Geletič, Pavel Krč, Hynek Řezníček, and Vladimír Fuka
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2901–2927, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2901-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2901-2024, 2024
Short summary
A machine learning approach for evaluating Southern Ocean cloud radiative biases in a global atmosphere model
Sonya L. Fiddes, Marc D. Mallet, Alain Protat, Matthew T. Woodhouse, Simon P. Alexander, and Kalli Furtado
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2641–2662, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2641-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2641-2024, 2024
Short summary
Decision Support System version 1.0 (DSS v1.0) for air quality management in Delhi, India
Gaurav Govardhan, Sachin D. Ghude, Rajesh Kumar, Sumit Sharma, Preeti Gunwani, Chinmay Jena, Prafull Yadav, Shubhangi Ingle, Sreyashi Debnath, Pooja Pawar, Prodip Acharja, Rajmal Jat, Gayatry Kalita, Rupal Ambulkar, Santosh Kulkarni, Akshara Kaginalkar, Vijay K. Soni, Ravi S. Nanjundiah, and Madhavan Rajeevan
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2617–2640, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2617-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2617-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Briggs, G.: Discussions on chimney plumes in neutral and stable surroundings, Atmos. Environ., 6, 507–510, 1972. 
Briggs, G. A.: Plume rise and buoyancy effects. Atmospheric Science and Power Production. Dept. of Energy, U.S., 327–366, 1984. 
Cao, G., Zhang, X., Gong, S., An, X., and Wang, Y.: Emission inventories of primary particles and pollutant gases for China, Chinese Sci. Bull., 56, 781–788, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-011-4373-7, 2011. 
Cao, J. J., Shen, Z. X., Chow, J. C., Watson, J. G., Lee, S. C., Tie, X. X., Ho, K. F., Wang, G. H., and Han, Y. M.: Winter and summer PM2.5 chemical compositions in fourteen Chinese cities, J. Air Waste Manage., 62, 1214–1226, https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2012.701193, 2012. 
Download
Short summary
Few studies have investigated the effects of initial conditions on the simulation or prediction of PM2.5 concentrations. Here, sensitivity experiments are used to explore the effects of three initial mechanisms (clean, restart, and continuous) and emissions in Xi’an in December 2016. According to this work, if the restart mechanism cannot be used due to computing resource and storage space limitations when forecasting PM2.5 concentrations, a spin-up time of at least 27 h is needed.