Articles | Volume 13, issue 8
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3529-2020
Special issue:
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3529-2020
Development and technical paper
 | 
07 Aug 2020
Development and technical paper |  | 07 Aug 2020

Simulating stable carbon isotopes in the ocean component of the FAMOUS general circulation model with MOSES1 (XOAVI)

Jennifer E. Dentith, Ruza F. Ivanovic, Lauren J. Gregoire, Julia C. Tindall, and Laura F. Robinson

Related authors

Simulating oceanic radiocarbon with the FAMOUS GCM: implications for its use as a proxy for ventilation and carbon uptake
Jennifer E. Dentith, Ruza F. Ivanovic, Lauren J. Gregoire, Julia C. Tindall, Laura F. Robinson, and Paul J. Valdes
Biogeosciences Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2019-365,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2019-365, 2019
Publication in BG not foreseen
Short summary

Related subject area

Biogeosciences
Sources of uncertainty in the SPITFIRE global fire model: development of LPJmL-SPITFIRE1.9 and directions for future improvements
Luke Oberhagemann, Maik Billing, Werner von Bloh, Markus Drüke, Matthew Forrest, Simon P. K. Bowring, Jessica Hetzer, Jaime Ribalaygua Batalla, and Kirsten Thonicke
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2021–2050, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2021-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2021-2025, 2025
Short summary
The unicellular NUM v.0.91: a trait-based plankton model evaluated in two contrasting biogeographic provinces
Trine Frisbæk Hansen, Donald Eugene Canfield, Ken Haste Andersen, and Christian Jannik Bjerrum
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1895–1916, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1895-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1895-2025, 2025
Short summary
FESOM2.1-REcoM3-MEDUSA2: an ocean–sea ice–biogeochemistry model coupled to a sediment model
Ying Ye, Guy Munhoven, Peter Köhler, Martin Butzin, Judith Hauck, Özgür Gürses, and Christoph Völker
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 977–1000, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-977-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-977-2025, 2025
Short summary
Satellite-based modeling of wetland methane emissions on a global scale (SatWetCH4 1.0)
Juliette Bernard, Elodie Salmon, Marielle Saunois, Shushi Peng, Penélope Serrano-Ortiz, Antoine Berchet, Palingamoorthy Gnanamoorthy, Joachim Jansen, and Philippe Ciais
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 863–883, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-863-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-863-2025, 2025
Short summary
Systematic underestimation of type-specific ecosystem process variability in the Community Land Model v5 over Europe
Christian Poppe Terán, Bibi S. Naz, Harry Vereecken, Roland Baatz, Rosie A. Fisher, and Harrie-Jan Hendricks Franssen
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 287–317, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-287-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-287-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Andres, R., Boden, T., and Marland, G.: Annual Fossil-Fuel CO2 Emissions: Global Stable Carbon Isotopic Signature, CDIAC, https://doi.org/10.3334/CDIAC/FFE.DB1013.2017, 1996. 
Andres, R. J., Marland, G., Boden, T., and Bischof, S.: Carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel consumption and cement manufacture, 1751–1991; and an estimate of their isotopic composition and latitudinal distribution, Oak Ridge National Lab., TN (United States), Oak Ridge Inst. for Science and Education, TN (United States), available at: https://www.osti.gov/biblio/10185357 (last access:29 October 2018), 1994. 
Bardin, A., Primeau, F., and Lindsay, K.: An offline implicit solver for simulating prebomb radiocarbon, Ocean Model., 73, 45–58, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2013.09.008, 2014. 
Behrenfeld, M. J. and Falkowski, P. G.: Photosynthetic rates derived from satellite-based chlorophyll concentration, Limnol. Oceanogr., 42, 1–20, https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1997.42.1.0001, 1997. 
Bouttes, N., Roche, D. M., Mariotti, V., and Bopp, L.: Including an ocean carbon cycle model into iLOVECLIM (v1.0), Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 1563–1576, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-1563-2015, 2015. 
Download
Short summary
We have added a new tracer (13C) into the ocean of the FAMOUS climate model to study large-scale circulation and the marine carbon cycle. The model captures the large-scale spatial pattern of observations but the simulated values are consistently higher than observed. In the first instance, our new tracer is therefore useful for recalibrating the physical and biogeochemical components of the model.
Share
Special issue