Articles | Volume 13, issue 6
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 2671–2694, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2671-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Special issue: The Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy) (ACP/GMD inter-journal...
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 2671–2694, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2671-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Model evaluation paper
18 Jun 2020
Model evaluation paper
| 18 Jun 2020
Superparameterised cloud effects in the EMAC general circulation model (v2.50) – influences of model configuration
Harald Rybka and Holger Tost
Related authors
Harald Rybka, Ulrike Burkhardt, Martin Köhler, Ioanna Arka, Luca Bugliaro, Ulrich Görsdorf, Ákos Horváth, Catrin I. Meyer, Jens Reichardt, Axel Seifert, and Johan Strandgren
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 4285–4318, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-4285-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-4285-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Estimating the impact of convection on the upper-tropospheric water budget remains a problem for models employing resolutions of several kilometers or more. A sub-kilometer high-resolution model is used to study summertime convection. The results suggest mostly close agreement with ground- and satellite-based observational data while slightly overestimating total frozen water path and anvil lifetime. The simulations are well suited to supplying information for parameterization development.
H. Rybka and H. Tost
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 5561–5576, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-5561-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-5561-2014, 2014
Ryan Vella, Matthew Forrest, Jos Lelieveld, and Holger Tost
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2022-154, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2022-154, 2022
Preprint under review for GMD
Short summary
Short summary
Biogenic volatile organic compounds (BVOC) are released by vegetation and have a major impact on atmospheric chemistry and aerosol formation. Non-interacting vegetation constraints the majority of numerical models used to estimate global BVOC emissions and thus the effects of changing vegetation on emissions are not addressed. In this work, we replace the offline vegetation with dynamic vegetation states by linking a chemistry-climate model with a global dynamic vegetation model.
Edward Groot and Holger Tost
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-515, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-515, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Thunderstorm systems play an important role in the dynamics of the Earth’s atmosphere and some of them form a well organised line: squall lines. Simulations of such squall lines with very small initial perturbations are compared to an unperturbed control simulation. The evolution of perturbations and processes amplifying them are analysed. It is shown that the formation of new secondary thunderstorm cells (after the initial primary cells) directly ahead of the line affects the spread strongly.
Mohamed Abdelkader, Georgiy Stenchikov, Andrea Pozzer, Holger Tost, and Jos Lelieveld
Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2022-177, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2022-177, 2022
Revised manuscript accepted for ACP
Short summary
Short summary
We study the effect of injected volcanic ash, water vapor, and SO2 on the development of the volcanic cloud and the stratospheric aerosol optical depth (AOD). Both are sensitive to the initial injection height and to the aging of the volcanic ash shaped by heterogeneous chemistry coupled with the ozone cycle. The manuscript explains the large differences in AOD for different injection scenarios which could improve the estimate of the radiative forcing of volcanic eruptions.
Andrea Pozzer, Simon F. Reifenberg, Vinod Kumar, Bruno Franco, Matthias Kohl, Domenico Taraborrelli, Sergey Gromov, Sebastian Ehrhart, Patrick Jöckel, Rolf Sander, Veronica Fall, Simon Rosanka, Vlassis Karydis, Dimitris Akritidis, Tamara Emmerichs, Monica Crippa, Diego Guizzardi, Johannes W. Kaiser, Lieven Clarisse, Astrid Kiendler-Scharr, Holger Tost, and Alexandra Tsimpidi
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 2673–2710, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2673-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2673-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
A newly developed setup of the chemistry general circulation model EMAC (ECHAM5/MESSy for Atmospheric Chemistry) is evaluated here. A comprehensive organic degradation mechanism is used and coupled with a volatility base model.
The results show that the model reproduces most of the tracers and aerosols satisfactorily but shows discrepancies for oxygenated organic gases. It is also shown that this model configuration can be used for further research in atmospheric chemistry.
Ralf Weigel, Christoph Mahnke, Manuel Baumgartner, Martina Krämer, Peter Spichtinger, Nicole Spelten, Armin Afchine, Christian Rolf, Silvia Viciani, Francesco D'Amato, Holger Tost, and Stephan Borrmann
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 13455–13481, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-13455-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-13455-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
In July and August 2017, the StratoClim mission took place in Nepal with eight flights of the M-55 Geophysica at up to 20 km in the Asian monsoon anticyclone. New particle formation (NPF) next to cloud ice was detected in situ by abundant nucleation-mode aerosols (> 6 nm) along with ice particles (> 3 µm). NPF was observed mainly below the tropopause, down to 15 % being non-volatile residues. Observed intra-cloud NPF indicates its importance for the composition in the tropical tropopause layer.
Vinod Kumar, Julia Remmers, Steffen Beirle, Joachim Fallmann, Astrid Kerkweg, Jos Lelieveld, Mariano Mertens, Andrea Pozzer, Benedikt Steil, Marc Barra, Holger Tost, and Thomas Wagner
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 5241–5269, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-5241-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-5241-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We present high-resolution regional atmospheric chemistry model simulations focused around Germany. We highlight the importance of spatial resolution of the model itself as well as the input emissions inventory and short-scale temporal variability of emissions for simulations. We propose a consistent approach for evaluating the simulated vertical distribution of NO2 using MAX-DOAS measurements while also considering its spatial sensitivity volume and change in sensitivity within this volume.
Harald Rybka, Ulrike Burkhardt, Martin Köhler, Ioanna Arka, Luca Bugliaro, Ulrich Görsdorf, Ákos Horváth, Catrin I. Meyer, Jens Reichardt, Axel Seifert, and Johan Strandgren
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 4285–4318, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-4285-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-4285-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Estimating the impact of convection on the upper-tropospheric water budget remains a problem for models employing resolutions of several kilometers or more. A sub-kilometer high-resolution model is used to study summertime convection. The results suggest mostly close agreement with ground- and satellite-based observational data while slightly overestimating total frozen water path and anvil lifetime. The simulations are well suited to supplying information for parameterization development.
Sara Bacer, Sylvia C. Sullivan, Odran Sourdeval, Holger Tost, Jos Lelieveld, and Andrea Pozzer
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 1485–1505, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1485-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1485-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We investigate the relative importance of the rates of both microphysical processes and unphysical correction terms that act as sources or sinks of ice crystals in cold clouds. By means of numerical simulations performed with a global chemistry–climate model, we assess the relevance of these rates at global and regional scales. This estimation is of fundamental importance to assign priority to the development of microphysics parameterizations and compare model output with observations.
Edward Groot and Holger Tost
Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2020-1142, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2020-1142, 2020
Publication in ACP not foreseen
Short summary
Short summary
Sensitivities and variability of upper tropospheric flow (~10 km height) resulting immediately and as a direct consequence of (thunder)storm activity have been modeled in detail down to resolutions of 100–200 m and explored for different (organisation/) storm types. It is shown that the amount of water condensation explains much of emerging variability in upper atmospheric flow. Part of the effects on the nearby upper atmospheric flow is suggested to be explained by (organisation/) storm type.
Matthew Forrest, Holger Tost, Jos Lelieveld, and Thomas Hickler
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 1285–1309, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1285-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1285-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We have integrated the LPJ-GUESS dynamic global vegetation model into the EMAC atmospheric chemistry-enabled GCM (general circulation model). This combined framework will enable the investigation of many land–atmosphere interactions and feedbacks with state-of-the-art simulation models. Initial results show that using the climate produced by EMAC together with LPJ-GUESS produces an acceptable representation of the global vegetation.
Julie M. Nicely, Bryan N. Duncan, Thomas F. Hanisco, Glenn M. Wolfe, Ross J. Salawitch, Makoto Deushi, Amund S. Haslerud, Patrick Jöckel, Béatrice Josse, Douglas E. Kinnison, Andrew Klekociuk, Michael E. Manyin, Virginie Marécal, Olaf Morgenstern, Lee T. Murray, Gunnar Myhre, Luke D. Oman, Giovanni Pitari, Andrea Pozzer, Ilaria Quaglia, Laura E. Revell, Eugene Rozanov, Andrea Stenke, Kane Stone, Susan Strahan, Simone Tilmes, Holger Tost, Daniel M. Westervelt, and Guang Zeng
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 1341–1361, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-1341-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-1341-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Differences in methane lifetime among global models are large and poorly understood. We use a neural network method and simulations from the Chemistry Climate Model Initiative to quantify the factors influencing methane lifetime spread among models and variations over time. UV photolysis, tropospheric ozone, and nitrogen oxides drive large model differences, while the same factors plus specific humidity contribute to a decreasing trend in methane lifetime between 1980 and 2015.
Jianzhong Ma, Christoph Brühl, Qianshan He, Benedikt Steil, Vlassis A. Karydis, Klaus Klingmüller, Holger Tost, Bin Chen, Yufang Jin, Ningwei Liu, Xiangde Xu, Peng Yan, Xiuji Zhou, Kamal Abdelrahman, Andrea Pozzer, and Jos Lelieveld
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 11587–11612, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-11587-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-11587-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
We find a pronounced maximum in aerosol extinction in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere over the Tibetan Plateau during the Asian summer monsoon, caused mainly by mineral dust emitted from the northern Tibetan Plateau and slope area, lofted to and accumulating within the anticyclonic circulation. Mineral dust, water-soluble compounds, such as nitrate and sulfate, and associated liquid water dominate aerosol extinction around the tropopause within the Asian summer monsoon anticyclone.
Mega Octaviani, Holger Tost, and Gerhard Lammel
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 3585–3607, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3585-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3585-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
This work presents a submodel description for the atmospheric cycling and air–surface exchange processes of semivolatile organic compounds. The submodel is meant to be applied within a global atmospheric chemistry–climate model. The simulation results for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons confirm progress in modelling semivolatile species, verified by comparison with surface monitoring data. The significance of new modelling features for tracer distributions was quantified in a sensitivity study.
J. Christopher Kaiser, Johannes Hendricks, Mattia Righi, Patrick Jöckel, Holger Tost, Konrad Kandler, Bernadett Weinzierl, Daniel Sauer, Katharina Heimerl, Joshua P. Schwarz, Anne E. Perring, and Thomas Popp
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 541–579, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-541-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-541-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
The implementation of the aerosol microphysics submodel MADE3 into the global atmospheric chemistry model EMAC is described and evaluated against an extensive pool of observational data, focusing on aerosol mass and number concentrations, size distributions, composition, and optical properties. EMAC (MADE3) is able to reproduce main aerosol properties reasonably well, in line with the performance of other global aerosol models.
Sara Bacer, Sylvia C. Sullivan, Vlassis A. Karydis, Donifan Barahona, Martina Krämer, Athanasios Nenes, Holger Tost, Alexandra P. Tsimpidi, Jos Lelieveld, and Andrea Pozzer
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 4021–4041, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4021-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4021-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
The complexity of ice nucleation mechanisms and aerosol--ice interactions makes their representation still challenging in atmospheric models. We have implemented a comprehensive ice crystal formation parameterization in the global chemistry-climate model EMAC to improve the representation of ice crystal number concentrations. The newly implemented parameterization takes into account processes which were previously neglected by the standard version of the model.
Mohamed Abdelkader, Swen Metzger, Benedikt Steil, Klaus Klingmüller, Holger Tost, Andrea Pozzer, Georgiy Stenchikov, Leonard Barrie, and Jos Lelieveld
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 3799–3821, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-3799-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-3799-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
We present a modeling study on the impacts of the key processes (dust emission flux, convection and dust aging parameterizations) that control the transatlantic dust transport using an advanced version of the EMAC atmospheric chemistry general circulation model. We define the
direct effect of dust agingas an increase in the AOD as a result of hygroscopic growth. We define the
indirect effectas a reduction in the dust AOD due to the higher removal of the aged dust particles.
Holger Tost
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 1125–1142, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1125-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1125-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
The paper describes the impact of lightning and the associated NOx emissions on upper-tropospheric aerosol nitrate. The consequences for both the chemical composition of the atmosphere as well as climatic impacts, which originate from lightning and modified aerosol particles, are analysed and discussed.
Mariano Mertens, Astrid Kerkweg, Patrick Jöckel, Holger Tost, and Christiane Hofmann
Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 3545–3567, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3545-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3545-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
This fourth part in a series of publications describing the newly developed regional chemistry–climate system MECO(n) is dedicated to the evaluation of MECO(n) with respect to tropospheric gas-phase chemistry. For this, a simulation incorporating two regional instances, one over Europe with 50 km resolution and one over Germany with 12 km resolution, is conducted. The model results are compared with satellite, ground-based and aircraft in situ observations.
Simone Dietmüller, Patrick Jöckel, Holger Tost, Markus Kunze, Catrin Gellhorn, Sabine Brinkop, Christine Frömming, Michael Ponater, Benedikt Steil, Axel Lauer, and Johannes Hendricks
Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 2209–2222, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-2209-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-2209-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
Four new radiation related submodels (RAD, AEROPT, CLOUDOPT, and ORBIT) are available within the MESSy framework now. They are largely based on the original radiation scheme of ECHAM5. RAD simulates radiative transfer, AEROPT calculates aerosol optical properties, CLOUDOPT calculates cloud optical properties, and ORBIT is responsible for Earth orbit calculations. Multiple diagnostic calls of the radiation routine are possible, so radiative forcing can be calculated during the model simulation.
Patrick Jöckel, Holger Tost, Andrea Pozzer, Markus Kunze, Oliver Kirner, Carl A. M. Brenninkmeijer, Sabine Brinkop, Duy S. Cai, Christoph Dyroff, Johannes Eckstein, Franziska Frank, Hella Garny, Klaus-Dirk Gottschaldt, Phoebe Graf, Volker Grewe, Astrid Kerkweg, Bastian Kern, Sigrun Matthes, Mariano Mertens, Stefanie Meul, Marco Neumaier, Matthias Nützel, Sophie Oberländer-Hayn, Roland Ruhnke, Theresa Runde, Rolf Sander, Dieter Scharffe, and Andreas Zahn
Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 1153–1200, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1153-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1153-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
With an advanced numerical global chemistry climate model (CCM) we performed several detailed
combined hind-cast and projection simulations of the period 1950 to 2100 to assess the
past, present, and potential future dynamical and chemical state of the Earth atmosphere.
The manuscript documents the model and the various applied model set-ups and provides
a first evaluation of the simulation results from a global perspective as a quality check of the data.
N. I. Kristiansen, A. Stohl, D. J. L. Olivié, B. Croft, O. A. Søvde, H. Klein, T. Christoudias, D. Kunkel, S. J. Leadbetter, Y. H. Lee, K. Zhang, K. Tsigaridis, T. Bergman, N. Evangeliou, H. Wang, P.-L. Ma, R. C. Easter, P. J. Rasch, X. Liu, G. Pitari, G. Di Genova, S. Y. Zhao, Y. Balkanski, S. E. Bauer, G. S. Faluvegi, H. Kokkola, R. V. Martin, J. R. Pierce, M. Schulz, D. Shindell, H. Tost, and H. Zhang
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 3525–3561, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3525-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3525-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
Processes affecting aerosol removal from the atmosphere are not fully understood. In this study we investigate to what extent atmospheric transport models can reproduce observed loss of aerosols. We compare measurements of radioactive isotopes, that attached to ambient sulfate aerosols during the 2011 Fukushima nuclear accident, to 19 models using identical emissions. Results indicate aerosol removal that is too fast in most models, and apply to aerosols that have undergone long-range transport.
A. J. G. Baumgaertner, P. Jöckel, A. Kerkweg, R. Sander, and H. Tost
Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 125–135, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-125-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-125-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
The Community Earth System Model (CESM1) is connected to the the Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy) as a new base model. This allows MESSy users the option to utilize either the state-of-the art spectral element atmosphere dynamical core or the finite volume core of CESM1. Additionally, this makes several other component models available to MESSy users.
H. G. Ouwersloot, A. Pozzer, B. Steil, H. Tost, and J. Lelieveld
Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 2435–2445, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2435-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2435-2015, 2015
A. Pozzer, A. de Meij, J. Yoon, H. Tost, A. K. Georgoulias, and M. Astitha
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 5521–5535, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5521-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5521-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
Thanks to numerical simulations and satellite observations, it is shown that aerosol optical depth (AOD) trends (2000--2010 period) over the US and Europe are due to emission decrease, while over the Sahara Desert and the Middle East they are due to meteorological changes. Over Southeast Asia, both meteorology and emission changes are important for the AOD trends.
It is shown that soluble components strongly influence AOD, as their contribution is enhanced by the aerosol water content.
K. Klingmüller, B. Steil, C. Brühl, H. Tost, and J. Lelieveld
Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 2503–2516, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-2503-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-2503-2014, 2014
D. Y. Chang, H. Tost, B. Steil, and J. Lelieveld
Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-14-21975-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-14-21975-2014, 2014
Preprint withdrawn
H. Rybka and H. Tost
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 5561–5576, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-5561-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-5561-2014, 2014
G. W. Mann, K. S. Carslaw, C. L. Reddington, K. J. Pringle, M. Schulz, A. Asmi, D. V. Spracklen, D. A. Ridley, M. T. Woodhouse, L. A. Lee, K. Zhang, S. J. Ghan, R. C. Easter, X. Liu, P. Stier, Y. H. Lee, P. J. Adams, H. Tost, J. Lelieveld, S. E. Bauer, K. Tsigaridis, T. P. C. van Noije, A. Strunk, E. Vignati, N. Bellouin, M. Dalvi, C. E. Johnson, T. Bergman, H. Kokkola, K. von Salzen, F. Yu, G. Luo, A. Petzold, J. Heintzenberg, A. Clarke, J. A. Ogren, J. Gras, U. Baltensperger, U. Kaminski, S. G. Jennings, C. D. O'Dowd, R. M. Harrison, D. C. S. Beddows, M. Kulmala, Y. Viisanen, V. Ulevicius, N. Mihalopoulos, V. Zdimal, M. Fiebig, H.-C. Hansson, E. Swietlicki, and J. S. Henzing
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 4679–4713, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-4679-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-4679-2014, 2014
C. Liu, S. Beirle, T. Butler, P. Hoor, C. Frankenberg, P. Jöckel, M. Penning de Vries, U. Platt, A. Pozzer, M. G. Lawrence, J. Lelieveld, H. Tost, and T. Wagner
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 1717–1732, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-1717-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-1717-2014, 2014
Y. F. Elshorbany, P. J. Crutzen, B. Steil, A. Pozzer, H. Tost, and J. Lelieveld
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 1167–1184, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-1167-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-1167-2014, 2014
C. Brühl, J. Lelieveld, M. Höpfner, and H. Tost
Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-13-11395-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-13-11395-2013, 2013
Revised manuscript not accepted
D. Kunkel, H. Tost, and M. G. Lawrence
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 4203–4222, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4203-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4203-2013, 2013
Related subject area
Climate and Earth system modeling
Assessment of JSBACHv4.30 as a land component of ICON-ESM-V1 in comparison to its predecessor JSBACHv3.2 of MPI-ESM1.2
Global biomass burning fuel consumption and emissions at 500 m spatial resolution based on the Global Fire Emissions Database (GFED)
Impact of increased resolution on the representation of the Canary upwelling system in climate models
Assessing Responses and Impacts of Solar climate intervention on the Earth system with stratospheric aerosol injection (ARISE-SAI): protocol and initial results from the first simulations
Introducing the VIIRS-based Fire Emission Inventory version 0 (VFEIv0)
Impact of physical parameterizations on wind simulation with WRF V3.9.1.1 under stable conditions at planetary boundary layer gray-zone resolution: a case study over the coastal regions of North China
Advancing precipitation prediction using a new-generation storm-resolving model framework – SIMA-MPAS (V1.0): a case study over the western United States
SURFER v2.0: a flexible and simple model linking anthropogenic CO2 emissions and solar radiation modification to ocean acidification and sea level rise
A new bootstrap technique to quantify uncertainty in estimates of ground surface temperature and ground heat flux histories from geothermal data
Modeling the topographic influence on aboveground biomass using a coupled model of hillslope hydrology and ecosystem dynamics
Impacts of the ice-particle size distribution shape parameter on climate simulations with the Community Atmosphere Model Version 6 (CAM6)
A modeling framework to understand historical and projected ocean climate change in large coupled ensembles
TriCCo v1.1.0 – a cubulation-based method for computing connected components on triangular grids
Estimation of missing building height in OpenStreetMap data: a French case study using GeoClimate 0.0.1
The Moist Quasi-Geostrophic Coupled Model: MQ-GCM 2.0
Transport parameterization of the Polar SWIFT model (version 2)
Analog data assimilation for the selection of suitable general circulation models
Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis for probabilistic weather and climate-risk modelling: an implementation in CLIMADA v.3.1.0
Grid refinement in ICON v2.6.4
Classification of tropical cyclone containing images using a convolutional neural network: performance and sensitivity to the learning dataset
The ICON-A model for direct QBO simulations on GPUs (version icon-cscs:baf28a514)
Further improvement and evaluation of nudging in the E3SM Atmosphere Model version 1 (EAMv1): simulations of the mean climate, weather events, and anthropogenic aerosol effects
HORAYZON v1.2: an efficient and flexible ray-tracing algorithm to compute horizon and sky view factor
LPJ-GUESS/LSMv1.0: a next-generation land surface model with high ecological realism
Downscaling multi-model climate projection ensembles with deep learning (DeepESD): contribution to CORDEX EUR-44
Intercomparison of four algorithms for detecting tropical cyclones using ERA5
Inland lake temperature initialization via coupled cycling with atmospheric data assimilation
wavetrisk-2.1: an adaptive dynamical core for ocean modelling
Representing surface heterogeneity in land–atmosphere coupling in E3SMv1 single-column model over ARM SGP during summertime
AWI-CM3 coupled climate model: description and evaluation experiments for a prototype post-CMIP6 model
The Seasonal-to-Multiyear Large Ensemble (SMYLE) prediction system using the Community Earth System Model version 2
Pathfinder v1.0: a Bayesian-inferred simple carbon-climate model to explore climate change scenarios
Comparison and evaluation of updates to WRF-Chem (v3.9) biogenic emissions using MEGAN
Checkerboard patterns in E3SMv2 and E3SM-MMFv2
MIdASv0.2.1 – MultI-scale bias AdjuStment
FOCI-MOPS v1 – integration of marine biogeochemistry within the Flexible Ocean and Climate Infrastructure version 1 (FOCI 1) Earth system model
Assessment of the Paris urban heat island in ERA5 and offline SURFEX-TEB (v8.1) simulations using the METEOSAT land surface temperature product
The Earth system model CLIMBER-X v1.0 – Part 1: Climate model description and validation
Cloud-based framework for inter-comparing submesoscale-permitting realistic ocean models
swNEMO_v4.0: an ocean model based on NEMO4 for the new-generation Sunway supercomputer
Embedding a one-column ocean model in the Community Atmosphere Model 5.3 to improve Madden–Julian Oscillation simulation in boreal winter
Introducing new lightning schemes into the CHASER (MIROC) chemistry–climate model
Improving Madden–Julian oscillation simulation in atmospheric general circulation models by coupling with a one-dimensional snow–ice–thermocline ocean model
Inclusion of a cold hardening scheme to represent frost tolerance is essential to model realistic plant hydraulics in the Arctic-Boreal Zone in CLM5.0-FATES-Hydro
Atmospheric river representation in the Energy Exascale Earth System Model (E3SM) version 1.0
Root-mean-square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE): when to use them or not
Spatial heterogeneity effects on land surface modeling of water and energy partitioning
Computation of longwave radiative flux and vertical heating rate with 4A-Flux v1.0 as an integral part of the radiative transfer code 4A/OP v1.5
Evaluating wind profiles in a numerical weather prediction model with Doppler lidar
Using a surrogate-assisted Bayesian framework to calibrate the runoff-generation scheme in the Energy Exascale Earth System Model (E3SM) v1
Rainer Schneck, Veronika Gayler, Julia E. M. S. Nabel, Thomas Raddatz, Christian H. Reick, and Reiner Schnur
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 8581–8611, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8581-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8581-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The versions of ICON-A and ICON-Land/JSBACHv4 used for this study constitute the first milestone in the development of the new ICON Earth System Model ICON-ESM. JSBACHv4 is the successor of JSBACHv3, and most of the parameterizations of JSBACHv4 are re-implementations from JSBACHv3. We assess and compare the performance of JSBACHv4 and JSBACHv3. Overall, the JSBACHv4 results are as good as JSBACHv3, but both models reveal the same main shortcomings, e.g. the depiction of the leaf area index.
Dave van Wees, Guido R. van der Werf, James T. Randerson, Brendan M. Rogers, Yang Chen, Sander Veraverbeke, Louis Giglio, and Douglas C. Morton
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 8411–8437, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8411-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8411-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We present a global fire emission model based on the GFED model framework with a spatial resolution of 500 m. The higher resolution allowed for a more detailed representation of spatial heterogeneity in fuels and emissions. Specific modules were developed to model, for example, emissions from fire-related forest loss and belowground burning. Results from the 500 m model were compared to GFED4s, showing that global emissions were relatively similar but that spatial differences were substantial.
Adama Sylla, Emilia Sanchez Gomez, Juliette Mignot, and Jorge López-Parages
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 8245–8267, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8245-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8245-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Increasing model resolution depends on the subdomain of the Canary upwelling considered. In the Iberian Peninsula, the high-resolution (HR) models do not seem to better simulate the upwelling indices, while in Morocco to the Senegalese coast, the HR models show a clear improvement. Thus increasing the resolution of a global climate model does not necessarily have to be the only way to better represent the climate system. There is still much work to be done in terms of physical parameterizations.
Jadwiga H. Richter, Daniele Visioni, Douglas G. MacMartin, David A. Bailey, Nan Rosenbloom, Brian Dobbins, Walker R. Lee, Mari Tye, and Jean-Francois Lamarque
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 8221–8243, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8221-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8221-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Solar climate intervention using stratospheric aerosol injection is a proposed method of reducing global mean temperatures to reduce the worst consequences of climate change. We present a new modeling protocol aimed at simulating a plausible deployment of stratospheric aerosol injection and reproducibility of simulations using other Earth system models: Assessing Responses and Impacts of Solar climate intervention on the Earth system with stratospheric aerosol injection (ARISE-SAI).
Gonzalo A. Ferrada, Meng Zhou, Jun Wang, Alexei Lyapustin, Yujie Wang, Saulo R. Freitas, and Gregory R. Carmichael
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 8085–8109, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8085-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8085-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The smoke from fires is composed of different compounds that interact with the atmosphere and can create poor air-quality episodes. Here, we present a new fire inventory based on satellite observations from the Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS). We named this inventory the VIIRS-based Fire Emission Inventory (VFEI). Advantages of VFEI are its high resolution (~500 m) and that it provides information for many species. VFEI is publicly available and has provided data since 2012.
Entao Yu, Rui Bai, Xia Chen, and Lifang Shao
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 8111–8134, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8111-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8111-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
A large number of simulations are conducted to investigate how different physical parameterization schemes impact surface wind simulations under stable weather conditions over the coastal regions of North China using the Weather Research and Forecasting model with a horizontal grid spacing of 0.5 km. Results indicate that the simulated wind speed is most sensitive to the planetary boundary layer schemes, followed by short-wave/long-wave radiation schemes and microphysics schemes.
Xingying Huang, Andrew Gettelman, William C. Skamarock, Peter Hjort Lauritzen, Miles Curry, Adam Herrington, John T. Truesdale, and Michael Duda
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 8135–8151, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8135-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8135-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We focus on the recent development of a state-of-the-art storm-resolving global climate model and investigate how this next-generation model performs for precipitation prediction over the western USA. Results show realistic representations of precipitation with significantly enhanced snowpack over complex terrains. The model evaluation advances the unified modeling of large-scale forcing constraints and realistic fine-scale features to advance multi-scale climate predictions and changes.
Marina Martínez Montero, Michel Crucifix, Victor Couplet, Nuria Brede, and Nicola Botta
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 8059–8084, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8059-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8059-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We present SURFER, a lightweight model that links CO2 emissions and geoengineering to ocean acidification and sea level rise from glaciers, ocean thermal expansion and Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets. The ice sheet module adequately describes the tipping points of both Greenland and Antarctica. SURFER is understandable, fast, accurate up to several thousands of years, capable of emulating results obtained by state of the art models and well suited for policy analyses.
Francisco José Cuesta-Valero, Hugo Beltrami, Stephan Gruber, Almudena García-García, and J. Fidel González-Rouco
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 7913–7932, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7913-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7913-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Inversions of subsurface temperature profiles provide past long-term estimates of ground surface temperature histories and ground heat flux histories at timescales of decades to millennia. Theses estimates complement high-frequency proxy temperature reconstructions and are the basis for studying continental heat storage. We develop and release a new bootstrap method to derive meaningful confidence intervals for the average surface temperature and heat flux histories from any number of profiles.
Yilin Fang, L. Ruby Leung, Charles D. Koven, Gautam Bisht, Matteo Detto, Yanyan Cheng, Nate McDowell, Helene Muller-Landau, S. Joseph Wright, and Jeffrey Q. Chambers
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 7879–7901, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7879-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7879-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We develop a model that integrates an Earth system model with a three-dimensional hydrology model to explicitly resolve hillslope topography and water flow underneath the land surface to understand how local-scale hydrologic processes modulate vegetation along water availability gradients. Our coupled model can be used to improve the understanding of the diverse impact of local heterogeneity and water flux on nutrient availability and plant communities.
Wentao Zhang, Xiangjun Shi, and Chunsong Lu
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 7751–7766, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7751-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7751-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The two-moment bulk cloud microphysics scheme used in CAM6 was modified to consider the impacts of the ice-crystal size distribution shape parameter (μi). After that, how the μi impacts cloud microphysical processes and then climate simulations is clearly illustrated by offline tests and CAM6 model experiments. Our results and findings are useful for the further development of μi-related parameterizations.
Yona Silvy, Clément Rousset, Eric Guilyardi, Jean-Baptiste Sallée, Juliette Mignot, Christian Ethé, and Gurvan Madec
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 7683–7713, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7683-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7683-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
A modeling framework is introduced to understand and decompose the mechanisms causing the ocean temperature, salinity and circulation to change since the pre-industrial period and into 21st century scenarios of global warming. This framework aims to look at the response to changes in the winds and in heat and freshwater exchanges at the ocean interface in global climate models, throughout the 1850–2100 period, to unravel their individual effects on the changing physical structure of the ocean.
Aiko Voigt, Petra Schwer, Noam von Rotberg, and Nicole Knopf
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 7489–7504, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7489-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7489-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
In climate science, it is helpful to identify coherent objects, for example, those formed by clouds. However, many models now use unstructured grids, which makes it harder to identify coherent objects. We present a new method that solves this problem by moving model data from an unstructured triangular grid to a structured cubical grid. We implement the method in an open-source Python package and show that the method is ready to be applied to climate model data.
Jérémy Bernard, Erwan Bocher, Elisabeth Le Saux Wiederhold, François Leconte, and Valéry Masson
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 7505–7532, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7505-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7505-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
OpenStreetMap is a collaborative project aimed at creaing a free dataset containing topographical information. Since these data are available worldwide, they can be used as standard data for geoscience studies. However, most buildings miss the height information that constitutes key data for numerous fields (urban climate, noise propagation, air pollution). In this work, the building height is estimated using statistical modeling using indicators that characterize the building's environment.
Sergey Kravtsov, Ilijana Mastilovic, Andrew McC. Hogg, William K. Dewar, and Jeffrey R. Blundell
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 7449–7469, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7449-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7449-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Climate is a complex system whose behavior is shaped by multitudes of processes operating on widely different spatial scales and timescales. In hierarchical modeling, one goes back and forth between highly idealized process models and state-of-the-art models coupling the entire range of climate subsystems to identify specific phenomena and understand their dynamics. The present contribution highlights an intermediate climate model focussing on midlatitude ocean–atmosphere interactions.
Ingo Wohltmann, Daniel Kreyling, and Ralph Lehmann
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 7243–7255, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7243-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7243-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The study evaluates the performance of the Data Assimilation Research Testbed (DART), equipped with the recently added forward operator Radiative Transfer for TOVS (RTTOV), in assimilating FY-4A visible images into the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model. The ability of the WRF-DART/RTTOV system to improve the forecasting skills for a tropical storm over East Asia and the Western Pacific is demonstrated in an Observing System Simulation Experiment framework.
Juan Ruiz, Pierre Ailliot, Thi Tuyet Trang Chau, Pierre Le Bras, Valérie Monbet, Florian Sévellec, and Pierre Tandeo
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 7203–7220, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7203-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7203-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We present a new approach to validate numerical simulations of the current climate. The method can take advantage of existing climate simulations produced by different centers combining an analog forecasting approach with data assimilation to quantify how well a particular model reproduces a sequence of observed values. The method can be applied with different observations types and is implemented locally in space and time significantly reducing the associated computational cost.
Chahan M. Kropf, Alessio Ciullo, Laura Otth, Simona Meiler, Arun Rana, Emanuel Schmid, Jamie W. McCaughey, and David N. Bresch
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 7177–7201, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7177-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7177-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Mathematical models are approximations, and modellers need to understand and ideally quantify the arising uncertainties. Here, we describe and showcase the first, simple-to-use, uncertainty and sensitivity analysis module of the open-source and open-access climate-risk modelling platform CLIMADA. This may help to enhance transparency and intercomparison of studies among climate-risk modellers, help focus future research, and lead to better-informed decisions on climate adaptation.
Günther Zängl, Daniel Reinert, and Florian Prill
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 7153–7176, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7153-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7153-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This article describes the implementation of grid refinement in the ICOsahedral Nonhydrostatic (ICON) model, which has been jointly developed at several German institutions and constitutes a unified modeling system for global and regional numerical weather prediction and climate applications. The grid refinement allows using a higher resolution in regional domains and transferring the information back to the global domain by means of a feedback mechanism.
Sébastien Gardoll and Olivier Boucher
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 7051–7073, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7051-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7051-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Tropical cyclones (TCs) are one of the most devastating natural disasters, which justifies monitoring and prediction in the context of a changing climate. In this study, we have adapted and tested a convolutional neural network (CNN) for the classification of reanalysis outputs (ERA5 and MERRA-2 labeled by HURDAT2) according to the presence or absence of TCs. We tested the impact of interpolation and of "mixing and matching" the training and test sets on the performance of the CNN.
Marco A. Giorgetta, William Sawyer, Xavier Lapillonne, Panagiotis Adamidis, Dmitry Alexeev, Valentin Clément, Remo Dietlicher, Jan Frederik Engels, Monika Esch, Henning Franke, Claudia Frauen, Walter M. Hannah, Benjamin R. Hillman, Luis Kornblueh, Philippe Marti, Matthew R. Norman, Robert Pincus, Sebastian Rast, Daniel Reinert, Reiner Schnur, Uwe Schulzweida, and Bjorn Stevens
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 6985–7016, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6985-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6985-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This work presents a first version of the ICON atmosphere model that works not only on CPUs, but also on GPUs. This GPU-enabled ICON version is benchmarked on two GPU machines and a CPU machine. While the weak scaling is very good on CPUs and GPUs, the strong scaling is poor on GPUs. But the high performance of GPU machines allowed for first simulations of a short period of the quasi-biennial oscillation at very high resolution with explicit convection and gravity wave forcing.
Shixuan Zhang, Kai Zhang, Hui Wan, and Jian Sun
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 6787–6816, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6787-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6787-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This study investigates the nudging implementation in the EAMv1 model. We find that (1) revising the sequence of calculations and using higher-frequency constraining data to improve the performance of a simulation nudged to EAMv1’s own meteorology, (2) using the relocated nudging tendency and 3-hourly ERA5 reanalysis to obtain a better agreement between nudged simulations and observations, and (3) using wind-only nudging are recommended for the estimates of global mean aerosol effects.
Christian R. Steger, Benjamin Steger, and Christoph Schär
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 6817–6840, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6817-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6817-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Terrain horizon and sky view factor are crucial quantities for many geoscientific applications; e.g. they are used to account for effects of terrain on surface radiation in climate and land surface models. Because typical terrain horizon algorithms are inefficient for high-resolution (< 30 m) elevation data, we developed a new algorithm based on a ray-tracing library. A comparison with two conventional methods revealed both its high performance and its accuracy for complex terrain.
David Martín Belda, Peter Anthoni, David Wårlind, Stefan Olin, Guy Schurgers, Jing Tang, Benjamin Smith, and Almut Arneth
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 6709–6745, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6709-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6709-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We present a number of augmentations to the ecosystem model LPJ-GUESS, which will allow us to use it in studies of the interactions between the land biosphere and the climate. The new module enables calculation of fluxes of energy and water into the atmosphere that are consistent with the modelled vegetation processes. The modelled fluxes are in fair agreement with observations across 21 sites from the FLUXNET network.
Jorge Baño-Medina, Rodrigo Manzanas, Ezequiel Cimadevilla, Jesús Fernández, Jose González-Abad, Antonio S. Cofiño, and José Manuel Gutiérrez
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 6747–6758, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6747-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6747-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Deep neural networks are used to produce downscaled regional climate change projections over Europe for temperature and precipitation for the first time. The resulting dataset, DeepESD, is analyzed against state-of-the-art downscaling methodologies, reproducing more accurately the observed climate in the historical period and showing plausible future climate change signals with low computational requirements.
Stella Bourdin, Sébastien Fromang, William Dulac, Julien Cattiaux, and Fabrice Chauvin
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 6759–6786, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6759-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6759-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
When studying tropical cyclones in a large dataset, one needs objective and automatic procedures to detect their specific pattern. Applying four different such algorithms to a reconstruction of the climate, we show that the choice of the algorithm is crucial to the climatology obtained. Mainly, the algorithms differ in their sensitivity to weak storms so that they provide different frequencies and durations. We review the different options to consider for the choice of the tracking methodology.
Stanley G. Benjamin, Tatiana G. Smirnova, Eric P. James, Eric J. Anderson, Ayumi Fujisaki-Manome, John G. W. Kelley, Greg E. Mann, Andrew D. Gronewold, Philip Chu, and Sean G. T. Kelley
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 6659–6676, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6659-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6659-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Application of 1-D lake models coupled within earth-system prediction models will improve accuracy but requires accurate initialization of lake temperatures. Here, we describe a lake initialization method by cycling within a weather prediction model to constrain lake temperature evolution. We compared these lake temperature values with other estimates and found much reduced errors (down to 1-2 K). The lake cycling initialization is now applied to two operational US NOAA weather models.
Nicholas K.-R. Kevlahan and Florian Lemarié
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 6521–6539, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6521-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6521-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
WAVETRISK-2.1 is an innovative climate model for the world's oceans. It uses state-of-the-art techniques to change the model's resolution locally, from O(100 km) to O(5 km), as the ocean changes. This dynamic adaptivity makes optimal use of available supercomputer resources, and allows two-dimensional global scales and three-dimensional submesoscales to be captured in the same simulation. WAVETRISK-2.1 is designed to be coupled its companion global atmosphere model, WAVETRISK-1.x.
Meng Huang, Po-Lun Ma, Nathaniel W. Chaney, Dalei Hao, Gautam Bisht, Megan D. Fowler, Vincent E. Larson, and L. Ruby Leung
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 6371–6384, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6371-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6371-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The land surface in one grid cell may be diverse in character. This study uses an explicit way to account for that subgrid diversity in a state-of-the-art Earth system model (ESM) and explores its implications for the overlying atmosphere. We find that the shallow clouds are increased significantly with the land surface diversity. Our work highlights the importance of accurately representing the land surface and its interaction with the atmosphere in next-generation ESMs.
Jan Streffing, Dmitry Sidorenko, Tido Semmler, Lorenzo Zampieri, Patrick Scholz, Miguel Andrés-Martínez, Nikolay Koldunov, Thomas Rackow, Joakim Kjellsson, Helge Goessling, Marylou Athanase, Qiang Wang, Jan Hegewald, Dmitry V. Sein, Longjiang Mu, Uwe Fladrich, Dirk Barbi, Paul Gierz, Sergey Danilov, Stephan Juricke, Gerrit Lohmann, and Thomas Jung
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 6399–6427, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6399-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6399-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We developed a new atmosphere–ocean coupled climate model, AWI-CM3. Our model is significantly more computationally efficient than its predecessors AWI-CM1 and AWI-CM2. We show that the model, although cheaper to run, provides results of similar quality when modeling the historic period from 1850 to 2014. We identify the remaining weaknesses to outline future work. Finally we preview an improved simulation where the reduction in computational cost has to be invested in higher model resolution.
Stephen G. Yeager, Nan Rosenbloom, Anne A. Glanville, Xian Wu, Isla Simpson, Hui Li, Maria J. Molina, Kristen Krumhardt, Samuel Mogen, Keith Lindsay, Danica Lombardozzi, Will Wieder, Who M. Kim, Jadwiga H. Richter, Matthew Long, Gokhan Danabasoglu, David Bailey, Marika Holland, Nicole Lovenduski, Warren G. Strand, and Teagan King
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 6451–6493, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6451-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6451-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The Earth system changes over a range of time and space scales, and some of these changes are predictable in advance. Short-term weather forecasts are most familiar, but recent work has shown that it is possible to generate useful predictions several seasons or even a decade in advance. This study focuses on predictions over intermediate timescales (up to 24 months in advance) and shows that there is promising potential to forecast a variety of changes in the natural environment.
Thomas Bossy, Thomas Gasser, and Philippe Ciais
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-802, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-802, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We developed a new simple climate model, designed to fill a perceived gap within the existing simple climate models by fulfilling three key requirements: calibration using Bayesian inference, possibility of coupling with integrated assessment models, and capacity to explore climate scenarios compatible with limiting climate impacts. Here, we describe the model, its calibration using the latest data from complex CMIP6 models and the IPCC AR6, and we assess its performance.
Mauro Morichetti, Sasha Madronich, Giorgio Passerini, Umberto Rizza, Enrico Mancinelli, Simone Virgili, and Mary Barth
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 6311–6339, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6311-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6311-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
In the present study, we explore the effect of making simple changes to the existing WRF-Chem MEGAN v2.04 emissions to provide MEGAN updates that can be used independently of the land surface model chosen. The changes made to the MEGAN algorithm implemented in WRF-Chem were the following: (i) update of the emission activity factors, (ii) update of emission factor values for each plant functional type (PFT), and (iii) the assignment of the emission factor by PFT to isoprene.
Walter Hannah, Kyle Pressel, Mikhail Ovchinnikov, and Gregory Elsaesser
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 6243–6257, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6243-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6243-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
An unphysical checkerboard signal is identified in two configurations of the atmospheric component of E3SM. The signal is very persistent and visible after averaging years of data. The signal is very difficult to study because it is often mixed with realistic weather. A method is presented to detect checkerboard patterns and compare the model with satellite observations. The causes of the signal are identified, and a solution for one configuration is discussed.
Peter Berg, Thomas Bosshard, Wei Yang, and Klaus Zimmermann
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 6165–6180, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6165-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6165-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
When performing impact analyses with climate models, one is often confronted with the issue that the models have significant bias. Commonly, the modelled climatological temperature deviates from the observed climate by a few degrees or it rains excessively in the model. MIdAS employs a novel statistical model to translate the model climatology toward that observed using novel methodologies and modern tools. The coding platform allows opportunities to develop methods for high-resolution models.
Chia-Te Chien, Jonathan V. Durgadoo, Dana Ehlert, Ivy Frenger, David P. Keller, Wolfgang Koeve, Iris Kriest, Angela Landolfi, Lavinia Patara, Sebastian Wahl, and Andreas Oschlies
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 5987–6024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5987-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5987-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We present the implementation and evaluation of a marine biogeochemical model, Model of Oceanic Pelagic Stoichiometry (MOPS) in the Flexible Ocean and Climate Infrastructure (FOCI) climate model. FOCI-MOPS enables the simulation of marine biological processes, the marine carbon, nitrogen and oxygen cycles, and air–sea gas exchange of CO2 and O2. As shown by our evaluation, FOCI-MOPS shows an overall adequate performance that makes it an appropriate tool for Earth climate system simulations.
Miguel Nogueira, Alexandra Hurduc, Sofia Ermida, Daniela C. A. Lima, Pedro M. M. Soares, Frederico Johannsen, and Emanuel Dutra
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 5949–5965, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5949-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5949-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We evaluated the quality of the ERA5 reanalysis representation of the urban heat island (UHI) over the city of Paris and performed a set of offline runs using the SURFEX land surface model. They were compared with observations (satellite and in situ). The SURFEX-TEB runs showed the best performance in representing the UHI, reducing its bias significantly. We demonstrate the ability of the SURFEX-TEB framework to simulate urban climate, which is crucial for studying climate change in cities.
Matteo Willeit, Andrey Ganopolski, Alexander Robinson, and Neil R. Edwards
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 5905–5948, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5905-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5905-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
In this paper we present the climate component of the newly developed fast Earth system model CLIMBER-X. It has a horizontal resolution of 5°x5° and is designed to simulate the evolution of the Earth system on temporal scales ranging from decades to >100 000 years. CLIMBER-X is available as open-source code and is expected to be a useful tool for studying past climate changes and for the investigation of the long-term future evolution of the climate.
Takaya Uchida, Julien Le Sommer, Charles Stern, Ryan P. Abernathey, Chris Holdgraf, Aurélie Albert, Laurent Brodeau, Eric P. Chassignet, Xiaobiao Xu, Jonathan Gula, Guillaume Roullet, Nikolay Koldunov, Sergey Danilov, Qiang Wang, Dimitris Menemenlis, Clément Bricaud, Brian K. Arbic, Jay F. Shriver, Fangli Qiao, Bin Xiao, Arne Biastoch, René Schubert, Baylor Fox-Kemper, William K. Dewar, and Alan Wallcraft
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 5829–5856, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5829-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5829-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Ocean and climate scientists have used numerical simulations as a tool to examine the ocean and climate system since the 1970s. Since then, owing to the continuous increase in computational power and advances in numerical methods, we have been able to simulate increasing complex phenomena. However, the fidelity of the simulations in representing the phenomena remains a core issue in the ocean science community. Here we propose a cloud-based framework to inter-compare and assess such simulations.
Yuejin Ye, Zhenya Song, Shengchang Zhou, Yao Liu, Qi Shu, Bingzhuo Wang, Weiguo Liu, Fangli Qiao, and Lanning Wang
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 5739–5756, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5739-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5739-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The swNEMO_v4.0 is developed with ultrahigh scalability through the concepts of hardware–software co-design based on the characteristics of the new Sunway supercomputer and NEMO4. Three breakthroughs, including an adaptive four-level parallelization design, many-core optimization and mixed-precision optimization, are designed. The simulations achieve 71.48 %, 83.40 % and 99.29 % parallel efficiency with resolutions of 2 km, 1 km and 500 m using 27 988 480 cores, respectively.
Yung-Yao Lan, Huang-Hsiung Hsu, Wan-Ling Tseng, and Li-Chiang Jiang
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 5689–5712, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5689-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5689-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This study has shown that coupling a high-resolution 1-D ocean model (SIT 1.06) with the Community Atmosphere Model 5.3 (CAM5.3) significantly improves the simulation of the Madden–Julian Oscillation (MJO) over the standalone CAM5.3. Systematic sensitivity experiments resulted in more realistic simulations of the tropical MJO because they had better upper-ocean resolution, adequate upper-ocean thickness, coupling regions including the eastern Pacific and southern tropics, and a diurnal cycle.
Yanfeng He, Hossain Mohammed Syedul Hoque, and Kengo Sudo
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 5627–5650, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5627-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5627-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Lightning-produced NOx (LNOx) is a major source of NOx. Hence, it is crucial to improve the prediction accuracy of lightning and LNOx in chemical climate models. By modifying existing lightning schemes and testing them in the chemical climate model CHASER, we improved the prediction accuracy of lightning in CHASER. Different lightning schemes respond very differently under global warming, which indicates further research is needed considering the reproducibility of long-term trends of lightning.
Wan-Ling Tseng, Huang-Hsiung Hsu, Yung-Yao Lan, Wei-Liang Lee, Chia-Ying Tu, Pei-Hsuan Kuo, Ben-Jei Tsuang, and Hsin-Chien Liang
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 5529–5546, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5529-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5529-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We show that coupling a high-resolution one-column ocean model to three atmospheric general circulation models dramatically improves Madden–Julian oscillation (MJO) simulations. It suggests two major improvements to the coupling process in the preconditioning phase and strongest convection phase over the Maritime Continent. Our results demonstrate a simple but effective way to significantly improve MJO simulations and potentially seasonal to subseasonal prediction.
Marius S. A. Lambert, Hui Tang, Kjetil S. Aas, Frode Stordal, Rosie A. Fisher, Yilin Fang, Junyan Ding, and Frans-Jan W. Parmentier
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2022-136, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2022-136, 2022
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, we implemented a hardening mortality scheme into CTSM5.0-FATES-Hydro, and evaluate how it impacts plant hydraulics and vegetation growth. Our work shows that the hydraulic modifications prescribed by the hardening scheme are necessary to model realistic vegetation growth in cold climates, in contrast to the default model that simulates almost nonexistent and declining vegetation due to abnormally large water loss through the roots.
Sol Kim, L. Ruby Leung, Bin Guan, and John C. H. Chiang
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 5461–5480, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5461-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5461-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The Energy Exascale Earth System Model (E3SM) project is a state-of-the-science Earth system model developed by the US Department of Energy (DOE). Understanding how the water cycle behaves in this model is of particular importance to the DOE’s mission. Atmospheric rivers (ARs) – which are crucial to the global water cycle – move vast amounts of water vapor through the sky and produce rain and snow. We find that this model reliably represents atmospheric rivers around the world.
Timothy O. Hodson
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 5481–5487, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5481-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5481-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The task of evaluating competing models is fundamental to science. Models are evaluated based on an objective function, the choice of which ultimately influences what scientists learn from their observations. The mean absolute error (MAE) and root-mean-squared error (RMSE) are two such functions. Both are widely used, yet there remains enduring confusion over their use. This article reviews the theoretical justification behind their usage, as well as alternatives for when they are not suitable.
Lingcheng Li, Gautam Bisht, and L. Ruby Leung
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 5489–5510, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5489-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5489-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Land surface heterogeneity plays a critical role in the terrestrial water, energy, and biogeochemical cycles. Our study systematically quantified the effects of four dominant heterogeneity sources on water and energy partitioning via Sobol' indices. We found that atmospheric forcing and land use land cover are the most dominant heterogeneity sources in determining spatial variability of water and energy partitioning. Our findings can help prioritize the future development of land surface models.
Yoann Tellier, Cyril Crevoisier, Raymond Armante, Jean-Louis Dufresne, and Nicolas Meilhac
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 5211–5231, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5211-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5211-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Accurate radiative transfer models (RTMs) are required to improve climate model simulations. We describe the module named 4A-Flux, which is implemented into 4A/OP RTM, aimed at calculating spectral longwave radiative fluxes given a description of the surface, atmosphere, and spectroscopy. In Pincus et al. (2020), 4A-Flux has shown good agreement with state-of-the-art RTMs. Here, it is applied to perform sensitivity studies and will be used to improve the understanding of radiative flux modeling.
Pyry Samuel Sebastian Pentikäinen, Ewan James O'Connor, and Pablo Ortiz-Amezcua
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2022-150, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2022-150, 2022
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
Short summary
We used Doppler lidar to evaluate the wind profiles generated by a weather forecast model. We first compared the Doppler lidar observations with collocated radiosonde profiles and they agree well. The model performs best over marine and coastal locations. Larger errors were seen in locations where the surface was more complex, especially in the wind direction. Our results show that Doppler lidar is a suitable instrument for evaluating the boundary layer wind profiles in atmospheric models.
Donghui Xu, Gautam Bisht, Khachik Sargsyan, Chang Liao, and L. Ruby Leung
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 5021–5043, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5021-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5021-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The runoff outputs in Earth system model simulations involve high uncertainty, which needs to be constrained by parameter calibration. In this work, we used a surrogate-assisted Bayesian framework to efficiently calibrate the runoff-generation processes in the Energy Exascale Earth System Model v1 at a global scale. The model performance was improved compared to the default parameter after calibration, and the associated parametric uncertainty was significantly constrained.
Cited articles
Adler, R., Sapiano, M., Huffman, G., Wang, J., Gu, G., Bolvin, D., Chiu, L.,
Schneider, U., Becker, A., Nelkin, E., Xie, P., Ferraro, R., and Shin, D.:
The Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) monthly analysis (New
Version 2.3) and a review of 2017 global precipitation, Atmosphere, 9, 138,
https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos9040138, 2018. a
Arakawa, A., Jung, J.-H., and Wu, C.-M.: Toward unification of the multiscale modeling of the atmosphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 3731–3742, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3731-2011, 2011. a, b
Baumgaertner, A. J. G., Jöckel, P., Kerkweg, A., Sander, R., and Tost, H.: Implementation of the Community Earth System Model (CESM) version 1.2.1 as a new base model into version 2.50 of the MESSy framework, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 125–135, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-125-2016, 2016. a
Bechtold, P., Chaboureau, J. P., Beljaars, A., Betts, A. K., Kohler, M.,
Miller, M., and Redelsperger, J. L.: The simulation of the diurnal cycle of
convective precipitation over land in a global model, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 130, 3119–3137, 2004. a
Beheng, K.: A parameterization of warm cloud microphysical conversion
processes, Atmos. Res., 33, 193–206,
https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-8095(94)90020-5, 11th International Conference on Clouds
and Precipitation, Part II, 1994. a
Blossey, P. N., Bretherton, C. S., and Wyant, M. C.: Subtropical Low Cloud
Response to a Warmer Climate in a Superparameterized Climate Model. Part II:
Column Modeling with a Cloud Resolving Model, J. Adv. Model.
Earth Syst., 1, 8, https://doi.org/10.3894/JAMES.2009.1.8, 2009. a
Bodas-Salcedo, A., Webb, M. J., Bony, S., Chepfer, H., Dufresne, J.-L., Klein,
S. A., Zhang, Y., Marchand, R., Haynes, J. M., Pincus, R., and John, V. O.:
COSP: Satellite simulation software for model assessment, B.
Am. Meteor. Soc., 92, 1023–1043,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2011BAMS2856.1, 2011. a
Bodas-Salcedo, A., Hill, P., Furtado, K., Williams, K., Field, P., Manners, J.,
Hyder, P., and Kato, S.: Large Contribution of Supercooled Liquid Clouds to
the Solar Radiation Budget of the Southern Ocean, J. Climate, 29, 4213–4228,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0564.1, 2016. a
Boucher, O., Randall, D., Artaxo, P., Bretherton, C., Feingold, G., Forster,
P., Kerminen, V.-M., Kondo, Y., Liao, H., Lohmann, U., Rasch, P., Satheesh,
S., Sherwood, S., Stevens, B., and Zhang, X.: Clouds and Aerosols, book
section 7, 571–658, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United
Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.016, 2013. a
Calisto, M., Folini, D., Wild, M., and Bengtsson, L.: Cloud radiative forcing intercomparison between fully coupled CMIP5 models and CERES satellite data, Ann. Geophys., 32, 793–807, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-32-793-2014, 2014. a
Cheng, A. and Xu, K.-M.: An explicit representation of vertical momentum
transport in a multiscale modeling framework through its 2-D cloud-resolving
model component, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119,
2356–2374, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD021078, 2014. a
Cheng, A. N. and Xu, K. M.: Diurnal variability of low clouds in the Southeast
Pacific simulated by a multiscale modeling framework model, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 9191–9208, https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50683,
2013. a
Cole, J. N. S., Barker, H. W., Randall, D. A., Khairoutdinov, M. F., and
Clothiaux, E. E.: Global consequences of interactions between clouds and
radiation at scales unresolved by global climate models, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 32, L06703, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL020945, 2005. a, b, c
Collier, J. C. and Bowman, K. P.: Diurnal cycle of tropical precipitation in a
general circulation model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, d17105,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004818, 2004. a
Cui, X. and Li, X.: Diurnal responses of tropical convective and stratiform
rainfall to diurnally varying sea surface temperature, Meteorol.
Atmos. Phys., 104, 53–61, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-008-0016-1, 2009. a
Dai, A.: Precipitation Characteristics in Eighteen Coupled Climate Models,
J. Climate, 19, 4605–4630, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3884.1, 2006. a
Demory, M.-E., Vidale, P. L., Roberts, M. J., Berrisford, P., Strachan, J.,
Schiemann, R., and Mizielinski, M. S.: The role of horizontal resolution in
simulating drivers of the global hydrological cycle, Clim. Dynam., 42,
2201–2225, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-013-1924-4, 2014. a
Dietmüller, S., Jöckel, P., Tost, H., Kunze, M., Gellhorn, C., Brinkop, S., Frömming, C., Ponater, M., Steil, B., Lauer, A., and Hendricks, J.: A new radiation infrastructure for the Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy, based on version 2.51), Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 2209–2222, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-2209-2016, 2016. a, b
Elliott, E. J., Yu, S., Kooperman, G. J., Morrison, H., Wang, M., and
Pritchard, M. S.: Sensitivity of summer ensembles of fledgling
superparameterized U.S. mesoscale convective systems to cloud resolving model
microphysics and grid configuration, J. Adv. Model. Earth
Syst., 8, 634–649, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015MS000567, 2016. a
Eyring, V., Bony, S., Meehl, G. A., Senior, C. A., Stevens, B., Stouffer, R. J., and Taylor, K. E.: Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 1937–1958, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1937-2016, 2016. a
Flato, G., Marotzke, J., Abiodun, B., Braconnot, P., Chou, S., Collins, W.,
Cox, P., Driouech, F., Emori, S., Eyring, V., Forest, C., Gleckler, P.,
Guilyardi, E., Jakob, C., Kattsov, V., Reason, C., and Rummukainen, M.:
Evaluation of Climate Models, book section 9, 741–866, Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA,
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.020, 2013. a
Grabowski, W. W.: Coupling cloud processes with the large-scale dynamics using
the Cloud-Resolving Convection Parameterization (CRCP), J.
Atmos. Sci., 58, 978–997,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2001)058<0978:CCPWTL>2.0.CO;2, 2001. a
Grabowski, W. W.: An improved framework for superparameterization, J.
Atmos. Sci., 61, 1940–1952,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2004)061<1940:AIFFS>2.0.CO;2, 2004a. a
Grabowski, W. W.: An Improved Framework for Superparameterization, J.
Atmos. Sci., 61, 1940–1952,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2004)061<1940:AIFFS>2.0.CO;2, 2004b. a
Grabowski, W. W.: Towards Global Large Eddy Simulation: Super-Parameterization
Revisited, J. Meteor. Soc. Japan. Ser. II, 94,
327–344, https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.2016-017, 2016. a
Grabowski, W. W. and Smolarkiewicz, P. K.: CRCP: a Cloud Resolving Convection
Parameterization for modeling the tropical convecting atmosphere, Physica D,
133, 171–178, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2789(99)00104-9, 1999. a
Guichard, F., Petch, J. C., Redelsperger, J.-L., Bechtold, P., Chaboureau,
J.-P., Cheinet, S., Grabowski, W., Grenier, H., Jones, C. G., Köhler, M.,
Piriou, J.-M., Tailleux, R., and Tomasini, M.: Modelling the diurnal cycle of
deep precipitating convection over land with cloud-resolving models and
single-column models, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 130, 3139–3172,
https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.03.145, 2004. a
Gustafson, W. I., Berg, L. K., Easter, R. C., and Ghan, S. J.: The
Explicit-Cloud Parameterized-Pollutant hybrid approach for aerosol-cloud
interactions in multiscale modeling framework models: tracer transport
results, Environ. Res. Lett., 3, 025005, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/3/2/025005, 2008. a
Haarsma, R. J., Roberts, M. J., Vidale, P. L., Senior, C. A., Bellucci, A., Bao, Q., Chang, P., Corti, S., Fučkar, N. S., Guemas, V., von Hardenberg, J., Hazeleger, W., Kodama, C., Koenigk, T., Leung, L. R., Lu, J., Luo, J.-J., Mao, J., Mizielinski, M. S., Mizuta, R., Nobre, P., Satoh, M., Scoccimarro, E., Semmler, T., Small, J., and von Storch, J.-S.: High Resolution Model Intercomparison Project (HighResMIP v1.0) for CMIP6, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 4185–4208, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-4185-2016, 2016. a
Haynes, J. M., Jakob, C., Rossow, W. B., Tselioudis, G., and Brown, J.: Major
Characteristics of Southern Ocean Cloud Regimes and Their Effects on the
Energy Budget, J. Climate, 24, 5061–5080,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2011JCLI4052.1, 2011. a
Heinze, R., Dipankar, A., Henken, C. C., Moseley, C., Sourdeval, O., Trömel,
S., Xie, X., Adamidis, P., Ament, F., Baars, H., Barthlott, C., Behrendt, A.,
Blahak, U., Bley, S., Brdar, S., Brueck, M., Crewell, S., Deneke, H.,
Di Girolamo, P., Evaristo, R., Fischer, J., Frank, C., Friederichs, P.,
Göcke, T., Gorges, K., Hande, L., Hanke, M., Hansen, A., Hege, H.-C., Hoose,
C., Jahns, T., Kalthoff, N., Klocke, D., Kneifel, S., Knippertz, P., Kuhn,
A., van Laar, T., Macke, A., Maurer, V., Mayer, B., Meyer, C. I., Muppa,
S. K., Neggers, R. A. J., Orlandi, E., Pantillon, F., Pospichal, B., Röber,
N., Scheck, L., Seifert, A., Seifert, P., Senf, F., Siligam, P., Simmer, C.,
Steinke, S., Stevens, B., Wapler, K., Weniger, M., Wulfmeyer, V., Zängl, G.,
Zhang, D., and Quaas, J.: Large-eddy simulations over Germany using ICON: a
comprehensive evaluation, Q. J. Roy. Meteor.
Soc., 143, 69–100, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2947, 2017a. a
Heinze, R., Moseley, C., Böske, L. N., Muppa, S. K., Maurer, V., Raasch, S., and Stevens, B.: Evaluation of large-eddy simulations forced with mesoscale model output for a multi-week period during a measurement campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 7083–7109, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-7083-2017, 2017b. a
Hourdin, F., Mauritsen, T., Gettelman, A., Golaz, J.-C., Balaji, V., Duan, Q.,
Folini, D., Ji, D., Klocke, D., Qian, Y., Rauser, F., Rio, C., Tomassini, L.,
Watanabe, M., and Williamson, D.: The Art and Science of Climate Model
Tuning, B. Am. Meteor. Soc., 98, 589–602,
https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00135.1, 2017. a
Huffman, G. J., Bolvin, D. T., Nelkin, E. J., Wolff, D. B., Adler, R. F., Gu,
G., Hong, Y., Bowman, K. P., and Stocker, E. F.: The TRMM Multisatellite
Precipitation Analysis (TMPA): Quasi-Global, Multiyear, Combined-Sensor
Precipitation Estimates at Fine Scales, J. Hydrometeorol., 8,
38–55, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM560.1, 2007. a
Jansson, F., van den Oord, G., Pelupessy, I., Grönqvist, J. H., Siebesma,
A. P., and Crommelin, D.: Regional Superparameterization in a Global
Circulation Model Using Large Eddy Simulations, J. Adv.
Model. Earth Syst., 11, 2958–2979, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001600, 2019. a
Jiang, J. H., Su, H., Zhai, C. X., Perun, V. S., Del Genio, A., Nazarenko,
L. S., Donner, L. J., Horowitz, L., Seman, C., Cole, J., Gettelman, A.,
Ringer, M. A., Rotstayn, L., Jeffrey, S., Wu, T. W., Brient, F., Dufresne,
J. L., Kawai, H., Koshiro, T., Watanabe, M., LEcuyer, T. S., Volodin, E. M.,
Iversen, T., Drange, H., Mesquita, M. D. S., Read, W. G., Waters, J. W.,
Tian, B. J., Teixeira, J., and Stephens, G. L.: Evaluation of cloud and water
vapor simulations in CMIP5 climate models using NASA “A-Train” satellite
observations, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, D14105,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD017237, 2012. a
Jöckel, P., Sander, R., Kerkweg, A., Tost, H., and Lelieveld, J.: Technical Note: The Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy) – a new approach towards Earth System Modeling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 433–444, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-433-2005, 2005. a
Jöckel, P., Kerkweg, A., Pozzer, A., Sander, R., Tost, H., Riede, H., Baumgaertner, A., Gromov, S., and Kern, B.: Development cycle 2 of the Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy2), Geosci. Model Dev., 3, 717–752, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-3-717-2010, 2010. a, b
Johnson, D.: Parametrization of the cloud topped boundary layer: aircraft
measurements, in: Workshop on Parametrization of the Cloud Topped Boundary
layer, 8–11 June 1993, 77–118, ECMWF, ECMWF, Shinfield Park, Reading,
1993. a
Jung, J. H. and Arakawa, A.: Development of a Quasi-3D Multiscale Modeling
Framework: Motivation, Basic Algorithm and Preliminary results, J.
Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 2, 11, https://doi.org/10.3894/JAMES.2010.2.11,
2010. a
Jung, J. H. and Arakawa, A.: Simulation of subgrid orographic precipitation
with an embedded 2-D cloud-resolving model, J. Adv. Model.
Earth Syst., 8, 31–40, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015MS000539, 2016. a
Kajikawa, Y., Yamaura, T., Tomita, H., and Satoh, M.: Impact of Tropical
Disturbance on the Indian Summer Monsoon Onset Simulated by a Global
Cloud-System-Resolving Model, SOLA, 11, 80–84,
https://doi.org/10.2151/sola.2015-020, 2015. a
Kajikawa, Y., Miyamoto, Y., Yoshida, R., Yamaura, T., Yashiro, H., and Tomita,
H.: Resolution dependence of deep convections in a global simulation from
over 10-kilometer to sub-kilometer grid spacing, Prog. Earth
Planet. Sci., 3, 16, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-016-0094-5, 2016. a
Kanamitsu, M., Ebisuzaki, W., Woollen, J., Yang, S.-K., Hnilo, J. J., Fiorino,
M., and Potter, G. L.: NCEP–DOE AMIP-II Reanalysis (R-2), B.
Am. Meteorol. Soc., 83, 1631–1643,
https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-83-11-1631, 2002. a
Karlsson, K.-G., Anttila, K., Trentmann, J., Stengel, M., Fokke Meirink, J., Devasthale, A., Hanschmann, T., Kothe, S., Jääskeläinen, E., Sedlar, J., Benas, N., van Zadelhoff, G.-J., Schlundt, C., Stein, D., Finkensieper, S., Håkansson, N., and Hollmann, R.: CLARA-A2: the second edition of the CM SAF cloud and radiation data record from 34 years of global AVHRR data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 5809–5828, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-5809-2017, 2017. a
Kerkweg, A. and Jöckel, P.: The 1-way on-line coupled atmospheric chemistry model system MECO(n) – Part 1: Description of the limited-area atmospheric chemistry model COSMO/MESSy, Geosci. Model Dev., 5, 87–110, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-87-2012, 2012. a
Khairoutdinov, M., Randall, D., and DeMott, C.: Simulations of the atmospheric
general circulation using a cloud-resolving model as a superparameterization
of physical processes, J. Atmos. Sci., 62, 2136–2154,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3453.1, 2005. a, b, c
Khairoutdinov, M., DeMott, C., and Randall, D.: Evaluation of the simulated
interannual and subseasonal variability in an AMIP-Style simulation using the
CSU multiscale modeling framework, J. Climate, 21, 413–431,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JCLI1630.1, 2008. a, b, c, d
Khairoutdinov, M. F. and Randall, D. A.: A cloud resolving model as a cloud
parameterization in the NCAR Community Climate System Model: Preliminary
results, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 3617–3620,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GL013552, 2001. a, b
Khairoutdinov, M. F. and Randall, D. A.: Cloud resolving modeling of the ARM
summer 1997 IOP: Model formulation, results, uncertainties, and
sensitivities, J. Atmos. Sci., 60, 607–625,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2003)060<0607:CRMOTA>2.0.CO;2, 2003. a, b, c
Khairoutdinov, M. F. and Randall, D.: High-Resolution Simulation of
Shallow-to-Deep Convection Transition over Land, J. Atmos.
Sci., 63, 3421–3436, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3810.1, 2006. a
Kikuchi, K. and Wang, B.: Diurnal Precipitation Regimes in the Global Tropics,
J. Climate, 21, 2680–2696, https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JCLI2051.1, 2008. a
Knutti, R., Stocker, T. F., Joos, F., and Plattner, G. K.: Constraints on
radiative forcing and future climate change from observations and climate
model ensembles, Nature, 416, 719–723, https://doi.org/10.1038/416719a, 2002. a
Kodama, C., Yamada, Y., Noda, A. T., Kikuchi, K., Kajikawa, Y., Nasuno, T.,
Tomita, T., Yamaura, T., Takahashi, H. G., Hara, M., Kawatani, Y., Satoh, M.,
and Sugi, M.: A 20-Year Climatology of a NICAM AMIP-Type Simulation, J. Meteor. Soc. Japan Ser. II, 93, 393–424,
https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.2015-024, 2015. a
Kooperman, G. J., Pritchard, M. S., and Somerville, R. C. J.: Robustness and
sensitivities of central U.S. summer convection in the super-parameterized
CAM: Multi-model intercomparison with a new regional EOF index, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 40, 3287–3291, https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50597, 2013. a
Kooperman, G. J., Pritchard, M. S., and Somerville, R. C. J.: The response of
US summer rainfall to quadrupled CO2 climate change in conventional and
superparameterized versions of the NCAR community atmosphere model, J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 6, 859–882,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2014MS000306, 2014. a
Kooperman, G. J., Pritchard, M. S., Burt, M. A., Branson, M. D., and Randall,
D. A.: Robust effects of cloud superparameterization on simulated daily
rainfall intensity statistics across multiple versions of the Community Earth
System Model, J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 8, 140–165,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2015MS000574, 2016. a, b
Lauer, A. and Hamilton, K.: Simulating Clouds with Global Climate Models: A
Comparison of CMIP5 Results with CMIP3 and Satellite Data, J.
Climate, 26, 3823–3845, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00451.1, 2013. a
Loeb, N. G., Wielicki, B. A., Doelling, D. R., Smith, G. L., Keyes, D. F.,
Kato, S., Manalo-Smith, N., and Wong, T.: Toward optimal closure of the
Earth's top-of-atmosphere radiation budget, J. Climate, 22, 748–766,
2009. a
Lohmann, U. and Roeckner, E.: Design and performance of a new cloud
microphysics scheme developed for the ECHAM general circulation model,
Clim. Dynam., 12, 557–572, https://doi.org/10.1007/s003820050128, 1996. a
Luo, Z. and Stephens, G. L.: An enhanced convection-wind-evaporation feedback
in a superparameterization GCM (SP-GCM) depiction of the Asian summer
monsoon, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L06707, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL025060, 2006. a
Mace, G. G.: Cloud properties and radiative forcing over the maritime storm
tracks of the Southern Ocean and North Atlantic derived from A-Train, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115, D10201, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012517, 2010. a
Maher, P., Vallis, G. K., Sherwood, S. C., Webb, M. J., and Sansom, P. G.: The
Impact of Parameterized Convection on Climatological Precipitation in
Atmospheric Global Climate Models, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45,
3728–3736, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL076826, 2018. a
Marchand, R. and Ackerman, T.: An analysis of cloud cover in multiscale
modeling framework global climate model simulations using 4 and 1 km
horizontal grids, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115, D16207,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013423, 2010. a, b, c, d
Marchand, R., Haynes, J., Mace, G. G., Ackerman, T., and Stephens, G.: A
comparison of simulated cloud radar output from the multiscale modeling
framework global climate model with CloudSat cloud radar observations,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, D00A20,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009790, 2009. a
Matsui, T., Chern, J.-D., Tao, W.-K., Lang, S., Satoh, M., Hashino, T., and
Kubota, T.: On the Land–Ocean Contrast of Tropical Convection and
Microphysics Statistics Derived from TRMM Satellite Signals and Global
Storm-Resolving Models, J. Hydrometeorol., 17, 1425–1445,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-15-0111.1, 2016. a
Mauritsen, T., Stevens, B., Roeckner, E., Crueger, T., Esch, M., Giorgetta, M.,
Haak, H., Jungclaus, J., Klocke, D., Matei, D., Mikolajewicz, U., Notz, D.,
Pincus, R., Schmidt, H., and Tomassini, L.: Tuning the climate of a global
model, J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 4, M00A01,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2012MS000154, 2012. a, b
Minghuai, W., E., L. V., Steven, G., Mikhail, O., P., S. D., Heng, X.,
Xiaohong, L., Philip, R., and Zhun, G.: A multiscale modeling framework model
(superparameterized CAM5) with a higher-order turbulence closure: Model
description and low-cloud simulations, J. Adv. Model. Earth
Syst., 7, 484–509, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014MS000375, 2015. a
Miura, H., Satoh, M., Nasuno, T., Noda, A. T., and Oouchi, K.: A Madden-Julian
Oscillation Event Realistically Simulated by a Global Cloud-Resolving Model,
Science, 318, 1763–1765, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1148443, 2007. a
Miyakawa, T., Satoh, M., Miura, H., Tomita, H., Yashiro, H., Noda, A. T.,
Yamada, Y., Kodama, C., Kimoto, M., and Yoneyama, K.: Madden-Julian
Oscillation prediction skill of a new-generation global model demonstrated
using a supercomputer, Nat. Commun., 5, 3769,
https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4769, 2014. a
Miyamoto, Y., Kajikawa, Y., Yoshida, R., Yamaura, T., Yashiro, H., and Tomita,
H.: Deep moist atmospheric convection in a subkilometer global simulation,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 4922–4926, https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50944, 2013. a
Morrison, H., Thompson, G., and Tatarskii, V.: Impact of Cloud Microphysics on
the Development of Trailing Stratiform Precipitation in a Simulated Squall
Line: Comparison of One- and Two-Moment Schemes, Mon. Weather Rev., 137,
991–1007, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008MWR2556.1, 2009. a
Moss, S., Francis, P., and Johnson, D.: Calculation and parameterization of the
effective radius of ice particles using aircraft data, in: Proc. 12th Int.
Conf. on Clouds and Precipitation, 1255–1258, 1996. a
Nordeng, T. E.: Extended versions of the convective parametrization scheme at
ECMWF and their impact on the mean and transient activity of the model in the
tropics, Technical Momorandum 206, ECMWF Research Department, European
Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasts, Reading, UK, 1994. a
O’Dell, C. W., Wentz, F. J., and Bennartz, R.: Cloud Liquid Water Path from
Satellite-Based Passive Microwave Observations: A New Climatology over the
Global Oceans, J. Climate, 21, 1721–1739,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JCLI1958.1, 2008. a
Parishani, H., Pritchard, M. S., Bretherton, C. S., Terai, C. R., Wyant, M. C.,
Khairoutdinov, M., and Singh, B.: Insensitivity of the Cloud Response to
Surface Warming Under Radical Changes to Boundary Layer Turbulence and Cloud
Microphysics: Results From the Ultraparameterized CAM, J. Adv.
Model. Earth Syst., 10, 3139–3158, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001409, 2018. a, b, c
Pritchard, M. S. and Somerville, R. C. J.: Assessing the Diurnal Cycle of
Precipitation in a Multi-Scale Climate Model, J. Adv. Model.
Earth Syst., 1, 12, 2009a. a
Pritchard, M. S. and Somerville, R. C. J.: Empirical orthogonal function
analysis of the diurnal cycle of precipitation in a multi-scale climate
model, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L05812, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL036964, l05812,
2009b. a, b
Pritchard, M. S., Bretherton, C. S., and DeMott, C. A.: Restricting 32–128 km
horizontal scales hardly affects the MJO in the Superparameterized Community
Atmosphere Model v.3.0 but the number of cloud-resolving grid columns
constrains vertical mixing, J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 6,
723–739, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014MS000340, 2014. a, b, c
Probst, P., Rizzi, R., Tosi, E., Lucarini, V., and Maestri, T.: Total cloud
cover from satellite observations and climate models, Atmos.
Res., 107, 161–170, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2012.01.005, 2012. a
Qin, H., Pritchard, M. S., Kooperman, G. J., and Parishani, H.: Global Effects
of Superparameterization on Hydrothermal Land-Atmosphere Coupling on Multiple
Timescales, J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 10, 530–549,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2017MS001185, 2018. a, b, c
Randall, D., Khairoutdinov, M. F., Arakawa, A., and Grabowski, W.: Breaking the
cloud parameterization deadlock, B. Am. Meteor.
Soc., 84, 1547–1564, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-84-11-1547, 2003. a
Randall, D. A.: Beyond deadlock, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 5970–5976,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2013GL057998, 2013. a
Roeckner, E., Bäuml, G., Bonaventura, L., Brokopf, R., Esch, M., Giorgetta,
M., Hagemann, S., Kirchner, I., Kornblueh, L., Manzini, E., Rhodin, A.,
Schlese, U., Schulzweida, U., and Tompkins, A.: The atmospheric general
circulation model ECHAM 5. Part I: Model description., Tech. Rep. 349,
Max-Planck-Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg,
available at: https://www.mpimet.mpg.de/fileadmin/publikationen/Reports/max_scirep_349.pdf (last access: 27 May 2020),
2003. a, b, c
Roeckner, E., Brokopf, R., Esch, M., Giorgetta, M., Hagemann, S., Kornblueh,
L., Manzini, E., Schlese, U., and Schulzweida, U.: Sensitivity of simulated
climate to horizontal and vertical resolution in the ECHAM5 atmosphere model,
J. Climate, 19, 3771–3791, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3824.1, 2006. a, b
Rybka, H. and Tost, H.: SP-EMAC – analysis and plotting scripts, Zenodo,
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3387004, 2019a. a
Rybka, H. and Tost, H.: SP-EMAC – model source code and input files, Zenodo,
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3386969, 2019b. a
Sato, T., Miura, H., Satoh, M., Takayabu, Y. N., and Wang, Y.: Diurnal Cycle of
Precipitation in the Tropics Simulated in a Global Cloud-Resolving Model,
J. Climate, 22, 4809–4826, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JCLI2890.1, 2009. a, b, c
Song, H., Zhang, Z., Ma, P.-L., Ghan, S., and Wang, M.: The importance of considering sub-grid cloud variability when using satellite observations to evaluate the cloud and precipitation simulations in climate models, Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 3147–3158, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3147-2018, 2018. a
Stephens, G. L., L'Ecuyer, T., Forbes, R., Gettelmen, A., Golaz, J.-C.,
Bodas-Salcedo, A., Suzuki, K., Gabriel, P., and Haynes, J.: Dreary state of
precipitation in global models, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
115, D24211, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014532, 2010. a
Stevens, B., Satoh, M., Auger, L., Biercamp, J., Bretherton, C. S., Chen, X.,
Düben, P., Judt, F., Khairoutdinov, M., Klocke, D., Kodama, C.,
Kornblueh, L., Lin, S.-J., Neumann, P., Putman, W. M., Röber, N.,
Shibuya, R., Vanniere, B., Vidale, P. L., Wedi, N., and Zhou, L.: DYAMOND:
the DYnamics of the Atmospheric general circulation Modeled On
Non-hydrostatic Domains, Progr. Earth Planet. Sci., 6, 61,
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-019-0304-z, 2019. a
Stevens, B., Acquistapace, C., Hansen, A., Heinze, R., Klinger, C., Klocke, D.,
Rybka, H., Schubotz, W., Windmiller, J., Adamidis, P., Arka, I., Barlakas,
V., Biercamp, J., Brueck, M., Brune, S., Buehler, S., Burkhardt, U., Cioni,
G., Costa-Surós, M., Crewell, S., Crueger, T., Deneke, H., Friederichs, P.,
Carbajal Henken, C., Hohenegger, C., Jacob, M., Jakub, F., Kalthoff, N.,
Kohler, M., Li, P., Lohnert, U., Macke, A., Madenach, N., Mayer, B., Nam, C.,
Naumann, A., Peters, K., Poll, S., Quaas, J., Rober, N., Rochetin, N.,
Scheck, L., Schemann, V., Schnitt, S., Seifert, A., Senf, F., Shapkalijevski,
M., Simmer, C., Singh, S., Sourdeval, O., Spickermann, D., Strandgren, J.,
Tessiot, O., Laar, T. v., Vercauteren, N., Vial, J., Voigt, A., and Zangl,
G.: The Added Value of Large-eddy and Storm-resolving Models for Simulating
Clouds and Precipitation, J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 98, 395–435,
https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.2020-021, 2020. a
Stubenrauch, C. J., Rossow, W. B., Kinne, S., Ackerman, S., Cesana, G.,
Chepfer, H., Di Girolamo, L., Getzewich, B., Guignard, A., Heidinger, A.,
Maddux, B. C., Menzel, W. P., Minnis, P., Pearl, C., Platnick, S., Poulsen,
C., Riedi, J., Sun-Mack, S., Walther, A., Winker, D., Zeng, S., and Zhao, G.:
Assessment of Global Cloud Datasets from Satellites: Project and Database
Initiated by the GEWEX Radiation Panel, B. Am.
Meteorol. Soc., 94, 1031–1049, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00117.1,
2013. a
Subramanian, A., Weisheimer, A., Palmer, T., Vitart, F., and Bechtold, P.:
Impact of stochastic physics on tropical precipitation in the coupled ECMWF
model, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 143, 852–865,
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2970, 2017. a
Sui, C.-H., Lau, K.-M., Takayabu, Y. N., and Short, D. A.: Diurnal Variations
in Tropical Oceanic Cumulus Convection during TOGA COARE, J.
Atmos. Sci., 54, 639–655,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1997)054<0639:DVITOC>2.0.CO;2, 1997. a
Sui, C.-H., Li, X., and Lau, K.-M.: Radiative–Convective Processes in
Simulated Diurnal Variations of Tropical Oceanic Convection, J.
Atmos. Sci., 55, 2345–2357,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1998)055<2345:RCPISD>2.0.CO;2, 1998. a
Sun, J. and Pritchard, M. S.: Effects of Explicit Convection on Land Surface
Air Temperature and Land-Atmosphere Coupling in the Thermal Feedback Pathway,
J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 10, 2376–2392,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001301, 2018. a, b, c
Suzuki, K., Stephens, G., Bodas-Salcedo, A., Wang, M., Golaz, J.-C., Yokohata,
T., and Koshiro, T.: Evaluation of the Warm Rain Formation Process in Global
Models with Satellite Observations, J. Atmos. Sci., 72,
3996–4014, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-14-0265.1, 2015. a
Swales, D. J., Pincus, R., and Bodas-Salcedo, A.: The Cloud Feedback Model Intercomparison Project Observational Simulator Package: Version 2, Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 77–81, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-77-2018, 2018. a
Tao, W. K., Chern, J. D., Atlas, R., Randall, D., Khairoutdinov, M., Li, J. L.,
Waliser, D. E., Hou, A., Lin, X., Peters-Lidard, C., Lau, W., Jiang, J., and
Simpson, J.: A Multiscale Modeling System: Developments, Applications, and
Critical Issues, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 90,
515–534, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008BAMS2542.1, 2009. a, b, c, d
Taylor, K. E.: Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in a single
diagram, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106, 7183–7192,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900719, 2001. a
Tiedtke, M.: A Comprehensive Mass Flux Scheme For Cumulus Parameterization In
Large-scale Models, Mon. Weather Rev., 117, 1779–1800,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1989)117<1779:ACMFSF>2.0.CO;2, 1989. a
Tompkins, A. M.: Organization of Tropical Convection in Low Vertical Wind
Shears: The Role of Cold Pools, J. Atmos. Sci., 58,
1650–1672, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2001)058<1650:OOTCIL>2.0.CO;2, 2001. a
Tost, H., Jöckel, P., and Lelieveld, J.: Influence of different convection parameterisations in a GCM, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 5475–5493, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-5475-2006, 2006. a
Tulich, S. N.: A strategy for representing the effects of convective momentum
transport in multiscale models: Evaluation using a new superparameterized
version of the Weather Research and Forecast model (SP-WRF), J.
Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 7, 938–962, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014MS000417,
2015. a, b, c
Wang, M., Ghan, S., Easter, R., Ovchinnikov, M., Liu, X., Kassianov, E., Qian, Y., Gustafson Jr., W. I., Larson, V. E., Schanen, D. P., Khairoutdinov, M., and Morrison, H.: The multi-scale aerosol-climate model PNNL-MMF: model description and evaluation, Geosci. Model Dev., 4, 137–168, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-137-2011, 2011a. a, b, c
Wang, M., Ghan, S., Ovchinnikov, M., Liu, X., Easter, R., Kassianov, E., Qian, Y., and Morrison, H.: Aerosol indirect effects in a multi-scale aerosol-climate model PNNL-MMF, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 5431–5455, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-5431-2011, 2011b. a
Wielicki, B. A., Barkstrom, B. R., Harrison, E. F., III, R. B. L., Smith,
G. L., and Cooper, J. E.: Clouds and the Earth's Radiant Energy System
(CERES): An Earth Observing System Experiment, B. Am.
Meteor
. Soc., 77, 853–868,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1996)077<0853:CATERE>2.0.CO;2, 1996. a
Wyant, M. C., Bretherton, C. S., Bacmeister, J. T., Kiehl, J. T., Held, I. M.,
Zhao, M., Klein, S. A., and Soden, B. J.: A comparison of low-latitude cloud
properties and their response to climate change in three AGCMs sorted into
regimes using mid-tropospheric vertical velocity, Clim. Dynam., 27,
261–279, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-006-0138-4, 2006a. a
Wyant, M. C., Khairoutdinov, M., and Bretherton, C. S.: Climate sensitivity and
cloud response of a GCM with a superparameterization, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 33, L06714, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL025464, 2006b. a, b
Wyant, M. C., Bretherton, C. S., and Blossey, P. N.: Subtropical Low Cloud
Response to a Warmer Climate in a Superparameterized Climate Model. Part I:
Regime Sorting and Physical Mechanisms, J. Adv. Model. Earth
Syst., 1, 7, https://doi.org/10.3894/JAMES.2009.1.7, 2009. a, b
Yang, S. and Smith, E. A.: Mechanisms for Diurnal Variability of Global
Tropical Rainfall Observed from TRMM, J. Climate, 19, 5190–5226,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3883.1, 2006.
a, b
Yashiro, H., Kajikawa, Y., Miyamoto, Y., Yamaura, T., Yoshida, R., and Tomita, H.: Resolution Dependence of the Diurnal Cycle of Precipitation Simulated by a Global Cloud-System Resolving Model, SOLA, 12, 272–276,
https://doi.org/10.2151/sola.2016-053, 2016. a
Zhang, G. J. and McFarlane, N. A.: Sensitivity of Climate Simulations To the
Parameterization of Cumulus Convection In the Canadian Climate Center
General-circulation Model, Atmos.-Ocean, 33, 407–446, 1995. a
Zhang, T., Zhang, M., Lin, W., Lin, Y., Xue, W., Yu, H., He, J., Xin, X., Ma, H.-Y., Xie, S., and Zheng, W.: Automatic tuning of the Community Atmospheric Model (CAM5) by using short-term hindcasts with an improved downhill simplex optimization method, Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 5189–5201, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-5189-2018, 2018. a
Zhang, Y., Klein, S. A., Liu, C., Tian, B., Marchand, R. T., Haynes, J. M.,
McCoy, R. B., Zhang, Y., and Ackerman, T. P.: On the diurnal cycle of deep
convection, high-level cloud, and upper troposphere water vapor in the
Multiscale Modeling Framework, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
113, D16105, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009905, 2008. a, b
Short summary
Simulating cloud processes and their interactions with their environment is one of the biggest challenges in atmospheric science. This study couples a cloud-resolving model with a global climate model to improve the representation of small-scale processes for climate simulations. Unlike conventional approaches, tropical precipitation is better simulated with the new model setup. However, the diurnal cycle of precipitation and cloud amounts can be significantly influenced by the chosen setup.
Simulating cloud processes and their interactions with their environment is one of the biggest...
