Articles | Volume 12, issue 12
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-5229-2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-5229-2019
Model evaluation paper
 | 
13 Dec 2019
Model evaluation paper |  | 13 Dec 2019

Sensitivity studies with the regional climate model COSMO-CLM 5.0 over the CORDEX Central Asia Domain

Emmanuele Russo, Ingo Kirchner, Stephan Pfahl, Martijn Schaap, and Ulrich Cubasch

Related authors

Climate model downscaling in central Asia: a dynamical and a neural network approach
Bijan Fallah, Masoud Rostami, Emmanuele Russo, Paula Harder, Christoph Menz, Peter Hoffmann, Iulii Didovets, and Fred F. Hattermann
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 161–180, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-161-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-161-2025, 2025
Short summary
The climate and vegetation of Europe, northern Africa, and the Middle East during the Last Glacial Maximum (21 000 yr BP) based on pollen data
Basil A. S. Davis, Marc Fasel, Jed O. Kaplan, Emmanuele Russo, and Ariane Burke
Clim. Past, 20, 1939–1988, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-20-1939-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-20-1939-2024, 2024
Short summary
High-resolution LGM climate of Europe and the Alpine region using the regional climate model WRF
Emmanuele Russo, Jonathan Buzan, Sebastian Lienert, Guillaume Jouvet, Patricio Velasquez Alvarez, Basil Davis, Patrick Ludwig, Fortunat Joos, and Christoph C. Raible
Clim. Past, 20, 449–465, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-20-449-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-20-449-2024, 2024
Short summary
Winter sensitivity of glacial states to orbits and ice sheet heights in CESM1.2
Jonathan Robert Buzan, Emmanuele Russo, Woon Mi Kim, and Christoph C. Raible
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-324,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-324, 2023
Preprint archived
Short summary
The long-standing dilemma of European summer temperatures at the mid-Holocene and other considerations on learning from the past for the future using a regional climate model
Emmanuele Russo, Bijan Fallah, Patrick Ludwig, Melanie Karremann, and Christoph C. Raible
Clim. Past, 18, 895–909, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-18-895-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-18-895-2022, 2022
Short summary

Related subject area

Climate and Earth system modeling
High-Resolution Model Intercomparison Project phase 2 (HighResMIP2) towards CMIP7
Malcolm J. Roberts, Kevin A. Reed, Qing Bao, Joseph J. Barsugli, Suzana J. Camargo, Louis-Philippe Caron, Ping Chang, Cheng-Ta Chen, Hannah M. Christensen, Gokhan Danabasoglu, Ivy Frenger, Neven S. Fučkar, Shabeh ul Hasson, Helene T. Hewitt, Huanping Huang, Daehyun Kim, Chihiro Kodama, Michael Lai, Lai-Yung Ruby Leung, Ryo Mizuta, Paulo Nobre, Pablo Ortega, Dominique Paquin, Christopher D. Roberts, Enrico Scoccimarro, Jon Seddon, Anne Marie Treguier, Chia-Ying Tu, Paul A. Ullrich, Pier Luigi Vidale, Michael F. Wehner, Colin M. Zarzycki, Bosong Zhang, Wei Zhang, and Ming Zhao
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1307–1332, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1307-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1307-2025, 2025
Short summary
T&C-CROP: representing mechanistic crop growth with a terrestrial biosphere model (T&C, v1.5) – model formulation and validation
Jordi Buckley Paules, Simone Fatichi, Bonnie Warring, and Athanasios Paschalis
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1287–1305, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1287-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1287-2025, 2025
Short summary
An updated non-intrusive, multi-scale, and flexible coupling interface in WRF 4.6.0
Sébastien Masson, Swen Jullien, Eric Maisonnave, David Gill, Guillaume Samson, Mathieu Le Corre, and Lionel Renault
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1241–1263, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1241-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1241-2025, 2025
Short summary
Monitoring and benchmarking Earth system model simulations with ESMValTool v2.12.0
Axel Lauer, Lisa Bock, Birgit Hassler, Patrick Jöckel, Lukas Ruhe, and Manuel Schlund
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1169–1188, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1169-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1169-2025, 2025
Short summary
The Earth Science Box Modeling Toolkit (ESBMTK 0.14.0.11): a Python library for research and teaching
Ulrich G. Wortmann, Tina Tsan, Mahrukh Niazi, Irene A. Ma, Ruben Navasardyan, Magnus-Roland Marun, Bernardo S. Chede, Jingwen Zhong, and Morgan Wolfe
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1155–1167, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1155-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1155-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Airey, M. and Hulme, M.: Evaluating climate model simulations of precipitation: methods, problems and performance, Prog. Phys. Geog., 19, 427–448, 1995. a
Alexeev, V., Nicolsky, D., Romanovsky, V., and Lawrence, D.: An evaluation of deep soil configurations in the CLM3 for improved representation of permafrost, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L09502, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL029536, 2007. a
Avgoustoglou, E., Voudouri, A., Khain, P., Grazzini, F., and Bettems, J.: Design and Evaluation of Sensitivity Tests of COSMO Model Over the Mediterranean Area, in: Perspectives on Atmospheric Sciences, Springer, 49–54, 2017. a
Awan, N., Truhetz, H., and Gobiet, A.: Parameterization-induced error characteristics of MM5 and WRF operated in climate mode over the Alpine region: an ensemble-based analysis, J. Climate, 24, 3107–3123, 2011. a
Bachner, S., Kapala, A., and Simmer, C.: Evaluation of daily precipitation characteristics in the CLM and their sensitivity to parameterizations, Meteorol. Z., 17, 407–419, 2008. a
Download
Short summary
This is an investigation of COSMO-CLM 5.0 sensitivity for the CORDEX Central Asia domain, with the main goal of evaluating general model performances for the area, proposing a model optimal configuration to be used in projection studies. Results show that the model seems to be particularly sensitive to those parameterizations that deal with soil and surface features and that could positively affect the repartition of incoming radiation.
Share