Articles | Volume 12, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-441-2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-441-2019
Model evaluation paper
 | 
25 Jan 2019
Model evaluation paper |  | 25 Jan 2019

A high-resolution biogeochemical model (ROMS 3.4 + bio_Fennel) of the East Australian Current system

Carlos Rocha, Christopher A. Edwards, Moninya Roughan, Paulina Cetina-Heredia, and Colette Kerry

Related authors

Surface current variability in the East Australian Current from long-term HF radar observations
Manh Cuong Tran, Moninya Roughan, and Amandine Schaeffer
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-480,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-480, 2024
Preprint under review for ESSD
Short summary
Comparison of 4-dimensional variational and ensemble optimal interpolation data assimilation systems using a Regional Ocean Modeling System (v3.4) configuration of the eddy-dominated East Australian Current system
Colette Gabrielle Kerry, Moninya Roughan, Shane Keating, David Gwyther, Gary Brassington, Adil Siripatana, and Joao Marcos A. C. Souza
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2359–2386, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2359-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2359-2024, 2024
Short summary
Exploring multi-decadal time series of temperature extremes in Australian coastal waters
Michael Hemming, Moninya Roughan, and Amandine Schaeffer
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 887–901, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-887-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-887-2024, 2024
Short summary
Observed multi-decadal trends in subsurface temperature adjacent to the East Australian Current
Michael P. Hemming, Moninya Roughan, Neil Malan, and Amandine Schaeffer
Ocean Sci., 19, 1145–1162, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-19-1145-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/os-19-1145-2023, 2023
Short summary
Moana Ocean Hindcast – a  > 25-year simulation for New Zealand waters using the Regional Ocean Modeling System (ROMS) v3.9 model
Joao Marcos Azevedo Correia de Souza, Sutara H. Suanda, Phellipe P. Couto, Robert O. Smith, Colette Kerry, and Moninya Roughan
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 211–231, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-211-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-211-2023, 2023
Short summary

Related subject area

Oceanography
A revised ocean mixed layer model for better simulating the diurnal variation in ocean skin temperature
Eui-Jong Kang, Byung-Ju Sohn, Sang-Woo Kim, Wonho Kim, Young-Cheol Kwon, Seung-Bum Kim, Hyoung-Wook Chun, and Chao Liu
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8553–8568, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8553-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8553-2024, 2024
Short summary
Evaluating an accelerated forcing approach for improving computational efficiency in coupled ice sheet–ocean modelling
Qin Zhou, Chen Zhao, Rupert Gladstone, Tore Hattermann, David Gwyther, and Benjamin Galton-Fenzi
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8243–8265, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8243-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8243-2024, 2024
Short summary
An optimal transformation method for inferring ocean tracer sources and sinks
Jan D. Zika and Taimoor Sohail
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8049–8068, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8049-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8049-2024, 2024
Short summary
PPCon 1.0: Biogeochemical-Argo profile prediction with 1D convolutional networks
Gloria Pietropolli, Luca Manzoni, and Gianpiero Cossarini
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7347–7364, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7347-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7347-2024, 2024
Short summary
Experimental design for the Marine Ice Sheet–Ocean Model Intercomparison Project – phase 2 (MISOMIP2)
Jan De Rydt, Nicolas C. Jourdain, Yoshihiro Nakayama, Mathias van Caspel, Ralph Timmermann, Pierre Mathiot, Xylar S. Asay-Davis, Hélène Seroussi, Pierre Dutrieux, Ben Galton-Fenzi, David Holland, and Ronja Reese
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7105–7139, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7105-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7105-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Alvera-Azcárate, A., Barth, A., Sirjacobs, D., Lenartz, F., and Beckers, J. M.: Data Interpolating Empirical Orthogonal Functions (DINEOF): a tool for geophysical data analyses, Mediterr. Mar. Sci., 12, 5–11, https://doi.org/10.12681/mms.64, 2010. 
Andersen, V., Nival, P., and Harris, R. P.: Modelling of a planktonic ecosystem in an enclosed water column, J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK., 67, 407–430, 1987. 
Anderson, T. R.: Plankton functional type modelling: running before we can walk?, J. Plankton Res., 27, 1073–1081, https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fbi076, 2005. 
Armbrecht, L. H., Roughan, M., Rossi, V., Schaeffer, A., Davies, P. L., Waite, A. M., and Armand, L. K.: Phytoplankton composition under contrasting oceanographic conditions: Upwelling and downwelling (Eastern Australia), Cont. Shelf Res., 75, 54–67, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2013.11.024, 2013. 
Baird, M. E., Timko, P. G., Suthers, I. M., and Middleton, J. H.: Coupled physical-biological modelling study of the East Australian Current with idealised wind forcing, Part I: Biological model intercomparison, J. Mar. Syst., 59, 249–270, 2006a. 
Download
Short summary
Off southeast Australia, the East Australian Current (EAC) moves warm nutrient-poor waters towards the pole. In this region, the EAC and a large number of vortices pinching off it strongly affect phytoplankton’s access to nutrients and light. To study these dynamics, we created a numerical model that is able to solve the ocean conditions and how they modulate the foundation of the region’s ecosystem. We validated model results against available data and this showed that the model performs well.