- About
- Editorial board
- Articles
- Special issues
- Highlight articles
- Manuscript tracking
- Subscribe to alerts
- Peer-review process
- For authors
- For editors and referees
- EGU publications
Journal cover
Journal topic
Geoscientific Model Development
An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic
- About
- Editorial board
- Articles
- Special issues
- Highlight articles
- Manuscript tracking
- Subscribe to alerts
- Peer-review process
- For authors
- For editors and referees
- EGU publications
Journal metrics
Journal metrics
IF 5.240
5.768CiteScore
8.9SNIP 1.713
SJR 3.18
index 71h5-index 51
Abstracted/indexed
Abstracted/indexed
GMD | Articles | Volume 12, issue 7
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 3017–3043, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3017-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3017-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 3017–3043, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3017-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3017-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Development and technical paper 17 Jul 2019
Development and technical paper | 17 Jul 2019
Reducing climate model biases by exploring parameter space with large ensembles of climate model simulations and statistical emulation
Sihan Li et al.
Related authors
Geert Jan van Oldenborgh, Folmer Krikken, Sophie Lewis, Nicholas J. Leach, Flavio Lehner, Kate R. Saunders, Michiel van Weele, Karsten Haustein, Sihan Li, David Wallom, Sarah Sparrow, Julie Arrighi, Roop P. Singh, Maarten K. van Aalst, Sjoukje Y. Philip, Robert Vautard, and Friederike E. L. Otto
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2020-69, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2020-69, 2020
Revised manuscript has not been submitted
Short summary
Short summary
Southeastern Australia suffered from disastrous bushfires during the 2019/20 fire season, raising the question whether these have become more likely due to climate change. We found no attributable trend in extreme annual or monthly low precipitation, but a clear shift towards more extreme heat. However, this shift is underestimated by the models. Analysing fire weather directly, we found that the chance has increased by at least 30 %, but due to the underestimation it could be much higher.
Ruksana H. Rimi, Karsten Haustein, Emily J. Barbour, Sarah N. Sparrow, Sihan Li, David C. H. Wallom, and Myles R. Allen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2018-400, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2018-400, 2018
Preprint under review for HESS
Short summary
Short summary
Extreme rainfall events are major concerns in Bangladesh because such events can cause flash floods and damage nearly harvestable crops in pre-monsoon season; whereas, in monsoon season, the impacts can range from widespread agricultural loss, huge property damage to loss of lives and livelihoods. This paper reveals the role of anthropogenic climate change drivers in changing the risks of extreme rainfall events during pre-monsoon and monsoon seasons at local sub-regional scale within Bangladesh.
Doug McNeall, Jonny Williams, Richard Betts, Ben Booth, Peter Challenor, Peter Good, and Andy Wiltshire
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 2487–2509, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2487-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2487-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
In the climate model FAMOUS, matching the modelled Amazon rainforest to observations required different land surface parameter settings than for other forests. It was unclear if this discrepancy was due to a bias in the modelled climate or an error in the land surface component of the model. Correcting the climate of the model with a statistical model corrects the simulation of the Amazon forest, suggesting that the land surface component of the model is not the source of the discrepancy.
Elizabeth R. Jachens, David E. Rupp, Clément Roques, and John S. Selker
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 1159–1170, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-1159-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-1159-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Recession analysis uses the receding streamflow following precipitation events to estimate watershed-average properties. Two methods for recession analysis use recession events individually or all events collectively. Using synthetic case studies, this paper shows that analyzing recessions collectively produces flawed interpretations. Moving forward, recession analysis using individual recessions should be used to describe the average and variability of watershed behavior.
Geert Jan van Oldenborgh, Folmer Krikken, Sophie Lewis, Nicholas J. Leach, Flavio Lehner, Kate R. Saunders, Michiel van Weele, Karsten Haustein, Sihan Li, David Wallom, Sarah Sparrow, Julie Arrighi, Roop P. Singh, Maarten K. van Aalst, Sjoukje Y. Philip, Robert Vautard, and Friederike E. L. Otto
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2020-69, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2020-69, 2020
Revised manuscript has not been submitted
Short summary
Short summary
Southeastern Australia suffered from disastrous bushfires during the 2019/20 fire season, raising the question whether these have become more likely due to climate change. We found no attributable trend in extreme annual or monthly low precipitation, but a clear shift towards more extreme heat. However, this shift is underestimated by the models. Analysing fire weather directly, we found that the chance has increased by at least 30 %, but due to the underestimation it could be much higher.
Laura E. Queen, Philip W. Mote, David E. Rupp, Oriana Chegwidden, and Bart Nijssen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2019-474, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2019-474, 2019
Preprint under review for HESS
Short summary
Short summary
Using a large ensemble of simulated flows throughout the Northwest, we compare daily flood statistics in the past (1950–99) and future (2050–99) periods and find that nearly all locations will experience an increase in flood magnitudes. The flood season expands significantly in many currently snow-dominant rivers, moving from exclusively spring to both winter and spring. These results, properly extended, may help inform flood risk management and the negotiations of the Columbia River Treaty.
Sjoukje Philip, Sarah Sparrow, Sarah F. Kew, Karin van der Wiel, Niko Wanders, Roop Singh, Ahmadul Hassan, Khaled Mohammed, Hammad Javid, Karsten Haustein, Friederike E. L. Otto, Feyera Hirpa, Ruksana H. Rimi, A. K. M. Saiful Islam, David C. H. Wallom, and Geert Jan van Oldenborgh
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 1409–1429, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-1409-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-1409-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
In August 2017 Bangladesh faced one of its worst river flooding events in recent history. For the large Brahmaputra basin, using precipitation alone as a proxy for flooding might not be appropriate. In this paper we explicitly test this assumption by performing an attribution of both precipitation and discharge as a flooding-related measure to climate change. We find the change in risk to be of similar order of magnitude (between 1 and 2) for both the meteorological and hydrological approach.
Chantelle Burton, Richard Betts, Manoel Cardoso, Ted R. Feldpausch, Anna Harper, Chris D. Jones, Douglas I. Kelley, Eddy Robertson, and Andy Wiltshire
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 179–193, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-179-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-179-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Fire and land-use change are important disturbances within the Earth system, and their inclusion in models is critical to enable the correct simulation of vegetation cover. Here we describe developments to the land surface model JULES to represent explicit land-use change and fire and to assess the effects of each process on present day vegetation compared to observations. Using historical land-use data and the fire model INFERNO, overall model results are improved by the developments.
Ruksana H. Rimi, Karsten Haustein, Emily J. Barbour, Sarah N. Sparrow, Sihan Li, David C. H. Wallom, and Myles R. Allen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2018-400, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2018-400, 2018
Preprint under review for HESS
Short summary
Short summary
Extreme rainfall events are major concerns in Bangladesh because such events can cause flash floods and damage nearly harvestable crops in pre-monsoon season; whereas, in monsoon season, the impacts can range from widespread agricultural loss, huge property damage to loss of lives and livelihoods. This paper reveals the role of anthropogenic climate change drivers in changing the risks of extreme rainfall events during pre-monsoon and monsoon seasons at local sub-regional scale within Bangladesh.
Camille Li, Clio Michel, Lise Seland Graff, Ingo Bethke, Giuseppe Zappa, Thomas J. Bracegirdle, Erich Fischer, Ben J. Harvey, Trond Iversen, Martin P. King, Harinarayan Krishnan, Ludwig Lierhammer, Daniel Mitchell, John Scinocca, Hideo Shiogama, Dáithí A. Stone, and Justin J. Wettstein
Earth Syst. Dynam., 9, 359–382, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-9-359-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-9-359-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
This study investigates the midlatitude atmospheric circulation response to 1.5°C and 2.0°C of warming using modelling experiments run for the HAPPI project (Half a degree Additional warming, Prognosis & Projected Impacts). While the chaotic nature of the atmospheric flow dominates in these low-end warming scenarios, some local changes emerge. Case studies explore precipitation impacts both for regions that dry (Mediterranean) and regions that get wetter (Europe, North American west coast).
Stephan Harrison, Jeffrey S. Kargel, Christian Huggel, John Reynolds, Dan H. Shugar, Richard A. Betts, Adam Emmer, Neil Glasser, Umesh K. Haritashya, Jan Klimeš, Liam Reinhardt, Yvonne Schaub, Andy Wiltshire, Dhananjay Regmi, and Vít Vilímek
The Cryosphere, 12, 1195–1209, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-1195-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-1195-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
Most mountain glaciers have receded throughout the last century in response to global climate change. This recession produces a range of natural hazards including glacial lake outburst floods (GLOFs). We have produced the first global inventory of GLOFs associated with the failure of moraine dams and show, counterintuitively, that these have reduced in frequency over recent decades. In this paper we explore the reasons for this pattern.
Corinne Le Quéré, Robbie M. Andrew, Pierre Friedlingstein, Stephen Sitch, Julia Pongratz, Andrew C. Manning, Jan Ivar Korsbakken, Glen P. Peters, Josep G. Canadell, Robert B. Jackson, Thomas A. Boden, Pieter P. Tans, Oliver D. Andrews, Vivek K. Arora, Dorothee C. E. Bakker, Leticia Barbero, Meike Becker, Richard A. Betts, Laurent Bopp, Frédéric Chevallier, Louise P. Chini, Philippe Ciais, Catherine E. Cosca, Jessica Cross, Kim Currie, Thomas Gasser, Ian Harris, Judith Hauck, Vanessa Haverd, Richard A. Houghton, Christopher W. Hunt, George Hurtt, Tatiana Ilyina, Atul K. Jain, Etsushi Kato, Markus Kautz, Ralph F. Keeling, Kees Klein Goldewijk, Arne Körtzinger, Peter Landschützer, Nathalie Lefèvre, Andrew Lenton, Sebastian Lienert, Ivan Lima, Danica Lombardozzi, Nicolas Metzl, Frank Millero, Pedro M. S. Monteiro, David R. Munro, Julia E. M. S. Nabel, Shin-ichiro Nakaoka, Yukihiro Nojiri, X. Antonio Padin, Anna Peregon, Benjamin Pfeil, Denis Pierrot, Benjamin Poulter, Gregor Rehder, Janet Reimer, Christian Rödenbeck, Jörg Schwinger, Roland Séférian, Ingunn Skjelvan, Benjamin D. Stocker, Hanqin Tian, Bronte Tilbrook, Francesco N. Tubiello, Ingrid T. van der Laan-Luijkx, Guido R. van der Werf, Steven van Heuven, Nicolas Viovy, Nicolas Vuichard, Anthony P. Walker, Andrew J. Watson, Andrew J. Wiltshire, Sönke Zaehle, and Dan Zhu
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 10, 405–448, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-405-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-405-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
The Global Carbon Budget 2017 describes data sets and methodology to quantify the five major components of the global carbon budget and their uncertainties. It is the 12th annual update and the 6th published in this journal.
Benoit P. Guillod, Richard G. Jones, Simon J. Dadson, Gemma Coxon, Gianbattista Bussi, James Freer, Alison L. Kay, Neil R. Massey, Sarah N. Sparrow, David C. H. Wallom, Myles R. Allen, and Jim W. Hall
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 611–634, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-611-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-611-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
Assessing the potential impacts of extreme events such as drought and flood requires large datasets of such events, especially when looking at the most severe and rare events. Using a state-of-the-art climate modelling infrastructure that is simulating large numbers of weather time series on volunteers' computers, we generate such a large dataset for the United Kingdom. The dataset covers the recent past (1900–2006) as well as two future time periods (2030s and 2080s).
Katja Frieler, Stefan Lange, Franziska Piontek, Christopher P. O. Reyer, Jacob Schewe, Lila Warszawski, Fang Zhao, Louise Chini, Sebastien Denvil, Kerry Emanuel, Tobias Geiger, Kate Halladay, George Hurtt, Matthias Mengel, Daisuke Murakami, Sebastian Ostberg, Alexander Popp, Riccardo Riva, Miodrag Stevanovic, Tatsuo Suzuki, Jan Volkholz, Eleanor Burke, Philippe Ciais, Kristie Ebi, Tyler D. Eddy, Joshua Elliott, Eric Galbraith, Simon N. Gosling, Fred Hattermann, Thomas Hickler, Jochen Hinkel, Christian Hof, Veronika Huber, Jonas Jägermeyr, Valentina Krysanova, Rafael Marcé, Hannes Müller Schmied, Ioanna Mouratiadou, Don Pierson, Derek P. Tittensor, Robert Vautard, Michelle van Vliet, Matthias F. Biber, Richard A. Betts, Benjamin Leon Bodirsky, Delphine Deryng, Steve Frolking, Chris D. Jones, Heike K. Lotze, Hermann Lotze-Campen, Ritvik Sahajpal, Kirsten Thonicke, Hanqin Tian, and Yoshiki Yamagata
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 4321–4345, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4321-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4321-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
This paper describes the simulation scenario design for the next phase of the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project (ISIMIP), which is designed to facilitate a contribution to the scientific basis for the IPCC Special Report on the impacts of 1.5 °C global warming. ISIMIP brings together over 80 climate-impact models, covering impacts on hydrology, biomes, forests, heat-related mortality, permafrost, tropical cyclones, fisheries, agiculture, energy, and coastal infrastructure.
Benoit P. Guillod, Richard G. Jones, Andy Bowery, Karsten Haustein, Neil R. Massey, Daniel M. Mitchell, Friederike E. L. Otto, Sarah N. Sparrow, Peter Uhe, David C. H. Wallom, Simon Wilson, and Myles R. Allen
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 1849–1872, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-1849-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-1849-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
The weather@home climate modelling system uses the computing power of volunteers around the world to generate a very large number of climate model simulations. This is particularly useful when investigating extreme weather events, notably for the attribution of these events to anthropogenic climate change. A new version of weather@home is presented and evaluated, which includes an improved representation of the land surface and increased horizontal resolution over Europe.
Diego Montes, Juan A. Añel, Tomás F. Pena, Peter Uhe, and David C. H. Wallom
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 811–826, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-811-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-811-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
This paper discusses the how the combination of cloud and volunteer computing can be a feasible solution to address large, complex, and expensive computing problems such as climate modelling.
Daniel Mitchell, Krishna AchutaRao, Myles Allen, Ingo Bethke, Urs Beyerle, Andrew Ciavarella, Piers M. Forster, Jan Fuglestvedt, Nathan Gillett, Karsten Haustein, William Ingram, Trond Iversen, Viatcheslav Kharin, Nicholas Klingaman, Neil Massey, Erich Fischer, Carl-Friedrich Schleussner, John Scinocca, Øyvind Seland, Hideo Shiogama, Emily Shuckburgh, Sarah Sparrow, Dáithí Stone, Peter Uhe, David Wallom, Michael Wehner, and Rashyd Zaaboul
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 571–583, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-571-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-571-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
This paper provides an experimental design to assess impacts of a world that is 1.5 °C warmer than at pre-industrial levels. The design is a new way to approach impacts from the climate community, and aims to answer questions related to the recent Paris Agreement. In particular the paper provides a method for studying extreme events under relatively high mitigation scenarios.
Doug McNeall, Jonny Williams, Ben Booth, Richard Betts, Peter Challenor, Andy Wiltshire, and David Sexton
Earth Syst. Dynam., 7, 917–935, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-7-917-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-7-917-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
We compare simulated with observed forests to constrain uncertain input parameters of the land surface component of a climate model.
We find that the model is unlikely to be able to simulate the Amazon and other major forests simultaneously at any one parameter set, suggesting a bias in the model's representation of the Amazon.
We find we cannot constrain parameters individually, but we can rule out large areas of joint parameter space.
Mitchell T. Black, David J. Karoly, Suzanne M. Rosier, Sam M. Dean, Andrew D. King, Neil R. Massey, Sarah N. Sparrow, Andy Bowery, David Wallom, Richard G. Jones, Friederike E. L. Otto, and Myles R. Allen
Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 3161–3176, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3161-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3161-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
This study presents a citizen science computing project, known as weather@home Australia–New Zealand, which runs climate models on thousands of home computers. By harnessing the power of volunteers' computers, this project is capable of simulating extreme weather events over Australia and New Zealand under different climate scenarios.
B. Poulter, N. MacBean, A. Hartley, I. Khlystova, O. Arino, R. Betts, S. Bontemps, M. Boettcher, C. Brockmann, P. Defourny, S. Hagemann, M. Herold, G. Kirches, C. Lamarche, D. Lederer, C. Ottlé, M. Peters, and P. Peylin
Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 2315–2328, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2315-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2315-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
Land cover is an essential variable in earth system models and determines conditions driving biogeochemical, energy and water exchange between ecosystems and the atmosphere. A methodology is presented for mapping plant functional types used in global vegetation models from a updated land cover classification system and open-source conversion tool, resulting from a consultative process among map producers and modelers engaged in the European Space Agency’s Land Cover Climate Change Initiative.
T. Osborne, J. Gornall, J. Hooker, K. Williams, A. Wiltshire, R. Betts, and T. Wheeler
Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 1139–1155, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-1139-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-1139-2015, 2015
R. A. Betts, N. Golding, P. Gonzalez, J. Gornall, R. Kahana, G. Kay, L. Mitchell, and A. Wiltshire
Biogeosciences, 12, 1317–1338, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-1317-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-1317-2015, 2015
J. C. S. Davie, P. D. Falloon, R. Kahana, R. Dankers, R. Betts, F. T. Portmann, D. Wisser, D. B. Clark, A. Ito, Y. Masaki, K. Nishina, B. Fekete, Z. Tessler, Y. Wada, X. Liu, Q. Tang, S. Hagemann, T. Stacke, R. Pavlick, S. Schaphoff, S. N. Gosling, W. Franssen, and N. Arnell
Earth Syst. Dynam., 4, 359–374, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-4-359-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-4-359-2013, 2013
G. S. Mauger, K. A. Bumbaco, G. J. Hakim, and P. W. Mote
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 2, 199–212, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-2-199-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-2-199-2013, 2013
Related subject area
Climate and Earth System Modeling
Development of the Community Water Model (CWatM v1.04) – a high-resolution hydrological model for global and regional assessment of integrated water resources management
WRF-GC (v1.0): online coupling of WRF (v3.9.1.1) and GEOS-Chem (v12.2.1) for regional atmospheric chemistry modeling – Part 1: Description of the one-way model
The Sailor diagram – A new diagram for the verification of two-dimensional vector data from multiple models
Global rules for translating land-use change (LUH2) to land-cover change for CMIP6 using GLM2
The interactive global fire module pyrE (v1.0)
IPSL-CM5A2 – an Earth system model designed for multi-millennial climate simulations
Observations for Model Intercomparison Project (Obs4MIPs): status for CMIP6
Superparameterised cloud effects in the EMAC general circulation model (v2.50) – influences of model configuration
The Flexible Ocean and Climate Infrastructure version 1 (FOCI1): mean state and variability
Investigating the sensitivity to resolving aerosol interactions in downscaling regional model experiments with WRFv3.8.1 over Europe
Correcting a bias in a climate model with an augmented emulator
Improving climate model coupling through a complete mesh representation: a case study with E3SM (v1) and MOAB (v5.x)
Ocean biogeochemistry in the Norwegian Earth System Model version 2 (NorESM2)
Development of a sequential tool, LMDZ-NEMO-med-V1, to conduct global-to-regional past climate simulation for the Mediterranean basin: an Early Holocene case study
The GGCMI Phase 2 experiment: global gridded crop model simulations under uniform changes in CO2, temperature, water, and nitrogen levels (protocol version 1.0)
Assessing the performance of climate change simulation results from BESM-OA2.5 compared with a CMIP5 model ensemble
Development of the MIROC-ES2L Earth system model and the evaluation of biogeochemical processes and feedbacks
Documenting numerical experiments in support of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6)
Parallel I∕O in Flexible Modelling System (FMS) and Modular Ocean Model 5 (MOM5)
COSMO-BEP-Tree v1.0: a coupled urban climate model with explicit representation of street trees
Statistical downscaling with the downscaleR package (v3.1.0): contribution to the VALUE intercomparison experiment
Lower boundary conditions in land surface models – effects on the permafrost and the carbon pools: a case study with CLM4.5
Simulating coupled surface–subsurface flows with ParFlow v3.5.0: capabilities, applications, and ongoing development of an open-source, massively parallel, integrated hydrologic model
HCLIM38: a flexible regional climate model applicable for different climate zones from coarse to convection-permitting scales
Including vegetation dynamics in an atmospheric chemistry-enabled general circulation model: linking LPJ-GUESS (v4.0) with the EMAC modelling system (v2.53)
Earth System Model Evaluation Tool (ESMValTool) v2.0 – diagnostics for emergent constraints and future projections from Earth system models in CMIP
Earth System Model Evaluation Tool (ESMValTool) v2.0 – technical overview
Role of vegetation in representing land surface temperature in the CHTESSEL (CY45R1) and SURFEX-ISBA (v8.1) land surface models: a case study over Iberia
Replicability of the EC-Earth3 Earth system model under a change in computing environment
Implementation of Yale Interactive terrestrial Biosphere model v1.0 into GEOS-Chem v12.0.0: a tool for biosphere–chemistry interactions
The NExus Solutions Tool (NEST) v1.0: an open platform for optimizing multi-scale energy–water–land system transformations
JULES-BE: representation of bioenergy crops and harvesting in the Joint UK Land Environment Simulator vn5.1
An aerosol climatology for global models based on the tropospheric aerosol scheme in the Integrated Forecasting System of ECMWF
Beijing Climate Center Earth System Model version 1 (BCC-ESM1): model description and evaluation of aerosol simulations
HETEROFOR 1.0: a spatially explicit model for exploring the response of structurally complex forests to uncertain future conditions – Part 1: Carbon fluxes and tree dimensional growth
Reconstructing climatic modes of variability from proxy records using ClimIndRec version 1.0
Development and testing scenarios for implementing land use and land cover changes during the Holocene in Earth system model experiments
Coupling of a sediment diagenesis model (MEDUSA) and an Earth system model (CESM1.2): a contribution toward enhanced marine biogeochemical modelling and long-term climate simulations
HighResMIP versions of EC-Earth: EC-Earth3P and EC-Earth3P-HR. Description, model performance, data handling and validation
Jena Soil Model (JSM v1.0; revision 1934): a microbial soil organic carbon model integrated with nitrogen and phosphorus processes
Evaluating Simulated Climate Patterns from theCMIP Archives Using Satellite and Reanalysis Datasets
A comprehensive assessment of tropical stratospheric upwelling in the specified dynamics Community Earth System Model 1.2.2 – Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model (CESM (WACCM))
Evaluation of the University of Victoria Earth System Climate Model version 2.10 (UVic ESCM 2.10)
The GGCMI phase II emulators: global gridded crop model responses to changes in CO2, temperature, water, and nitrogen (version 1.0)
JULES-GL7: the Global Land configuration of the Joint UK Land Environment Simulator version 7.0 and 7.2
The generation of gridded emissions data for CMIP6
ACCESS-OM2 v1.0: a global ocean–sea ice model at three resolutions
An urban ecohydrological model to quantify the effect of vegetation on urban climate and hydrology (UT&C v1.0)
Taiwan Earth System Model Version 1: Description and Evaluation of Mean State
A simulator for the CLARA-A2 cloud climate data record and its application to assess EC-Earth polar cloudiness
Peter Burek, Yusuke Satoh, Taher Kahil, Ting Tang, Peter Greve, Mikhail Smilovic, Luca Guillaumot, Fang Zhao, and Yoshihide Wada
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 3267–3298, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3267-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3267-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We present the new global hydrological model "Community Water Model" (CWatM), which can be used globally and regionally. The model is open source and written with the Python programming language. It uses global, freely available data in a smart and state-of-the-art format. It includes the major hydrological processes but also takes into account human activities, such as water use and reservoir regulation, by calculating water demand from the agriculture, domestic, and industrial sectors.
Haipeng Lin, Xu Feng, Tzung-May Fu, Heng Tian, Yaping Ma, Lijuan Zhang, Daniel J. Jacob, Robert M. Yantosca, Melissa P. Sulprizio, Elizabeth W. Lundgren, Jiawei Zhuang, Qiang Zhang, Xiao Lu, Lin Zhang, Lu Shen, Jianping Guo, Sebastian D. Eastham, and Christoph A. Keller
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 3241–3265, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3241-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3241-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Online coupling of meteorology and chemistry models often presents maintenance issues with hard-wired coding. We present WRF-GC, an one-way online coupling of the WRF meteorological model and GEOS-Chem atmospheric chemistry model for regional atmospheric chemistry and air quality modeling. Our coupling structure allows future versions of either parent model to be immediately integrated into WRF-GC. The WRF-GC model was able to well reproduce regional PM2.5 with greater computational efficiency.
Jon Sáenz, Sheila Carreno-Madinabeitia, Ganix Esnaola, Santos J. González-Rojí, Gabriel Ibarra-Berastegi, and Alain Ulazia
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 3221–3240, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3221-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3221-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
A new diagram for the verification of vector variables (wind, current, etc.) generated by multiple models against a set of observations is presented in this package. It has been designed as a generalization of the Taylor diagram for two-dimensional quantities. It is based on the analysis of the two-dimensional structure of the mean squared error matrix between model and observations, and it allows for an easy assessment of both bias and directional errors as well.
Lei Ma, George C. Hurtt, Louise P. Chini, Ritvik Sahajpal, Julia Pongratz, Steve Frolking, Elke Stehfest, Kees Klein Goldewijk, Donal O'Leary, and Jonathan C. Doelman
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 3203–3220, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3203-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3203-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Earth system models require information on historical land cover change. We present transition rules to generate land cover change from newly developed land use dataset (Land-use Harmonization, LUH2). The resulting forest cover, vegetation carbon, and emissions from land use and land cover change are simulated and evaluated against remote sensing data and other studies. The rules can guide the incorporation of land-cover information within earth system models for CMIP6.
Keren Mezuman, Kostas Tsigaridis, Gregory Faluvegi, and Susanne E. Bauer
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 3091–3118, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3091-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3091-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Fires affect the composition of the atmosphere and Earth’s radiation balance by emitting a suite of reactive gases and particles. An interactive fire module in an Earth system model (ESM) allows us to study the natural and anthropogenic drivers, feedbacks, and interactions of open fires. To do so, we have developed pyrE, the NASA GISS interactive fire emissions module.
The main motivation behind this work is to have fire emissions reacting to climate change and anthropogenic activities.
Pierre Sepulchre, Arnaud Caubel, Jean-Baptiste Ladant, Laurent Bopp, Olivier Boucher, Pascale Braconnot, Patrick Brockmann, Anne Cozic, Yannick Donnadieu, Jean-Louis Dufresne, Victor Estella-Perez, Christian Ethé, Frédéric Fluteau, Marie-Alice Foujols, Guillaume Gastineau, Josefine Ghattas, Didier Hauglustaine, Frédéric Hourdin, Masa Kageyama, Myriam Khodri, Olivier Marti, Yann Meurdesoif, Juliette Mignot, Anta-Clarisse Sarr, Jérôme Servonnat, Didier Swingedouw, Sophie Szopa, and Delphine Tardif
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 3011–3053, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3011-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3011-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Our paper describes IPSL-CM5A2, an Earth system model that can be integrated for long (several thousands of years) climate simulations. We describe the technical aspects, assess the model computing performance and evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the model, by comparing pre-industrial and historical runs to the previous-generation model simulations and to observations. We also present a Cretaceous simulation as a case study to show how the model simulates deep-time paleoclimates.
Duane Waliser, Peter J. Gleckler, Robert Ferraro, Karl E. Taylor, Sasha Ames, James Biard, Michael G. Bosilovich, Otis Brown, Helene Chepfer, Luca Cinquini, Paul J. Durack, Veronika Eyring, Pierre-Philippe Mathieu, Tsengdar Lee, Simon Pinnock, Gerald L. Potter, Michel Rixen, Roger Saunders, Jörg Schulz, Jean-Noël Thépaut, and Matthias Tuma
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 2945–2958, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2945-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2945-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
This paper provides an update to an international research activity whose objective is to facilitate access to satellite and other types of regional and global datasets for evaluating global models used to produce 21st century climate projections.
Harald Rybka and Holger Tost
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 2671–2694, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2671-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2671-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Simulating cloud processes and their interactions with their environment is one of the biggest challenges in atmospheric science. This study couples a cloud-resolving model with a global climate model to improve the representation of small-scale processes for climate simulations. Unlike conventional approaches, tropical precipitation is better simulated with the new model setup. However, the diurnal cycle of precipitation and cloud amounts can be significantly influenced by the chosen setup.
Katja Matthes, Arne Biastoch, Sebastian Wahl, Jan Harlaß, Torge Martin, Tim Brücher, Annika Drews, Dana Ehlert, Klaus Getzlaff, Fritz Krüger, Willi Rath, Markus Scheinert, Franziska U. Schwarzkopf, Tobias Bayr, Hauke Schmidt, and Wonsun Park
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 2533–2568, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2533-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2533-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
A new Earth system model, the Flexible Ocean and Climate Infrastructure (FOCI), is introduced, consisting of a high-top atmosphere, an ocean model, sea-ice and land surface model components. A unique feature of FOCI is the ability to explicitly resolve small-scale oceanic features, for example, the Agulhas Current and the Gulf Stream. It allows to study the evolution of the climate system on regional and seasonal to (multi)decadal scales and bridges the gap to coarse-resolution climate models.
Vasileios Pavlidis, Eleni Katragkou, Andreas Prein, Aristeidis K. Georgoulias, Stergios Kartsios, Prodromos Zanis, and Theodoros Karacostas
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 2511–2532, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2511-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2511-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Our study investigates the role of aerosols in the climate of Europe by using a computer model and exploring different aerosol options available in this model as well as different aerosol datasets. Results show that aerosols can have a considerable impact on many aspects of the climate. Aerosols reduce solar radiation and temperature at the surface. Precipitation is not particularly affected in any specific direction. The cloudiness amount change is small. Also, changes in wind pattern are seen.
Doug McNeall, Jonny Williams, Richard Betts, Ben Booth, Peter Challenor, Peter Good, and Andy Wiltshire
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 2487–2509, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2487-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2487-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
In the climate model FAMOUS, matching the modelled Amazon rainforest to observations required different land surface parameter settings than for other forests. It was unclear if this discrepancy was due to a bias in the modelled climate or an error in the land surface component of the model. Correcting the climate of the model with a statistical model corrects the simulation of the Amazon forest, suggesting that the land surface component of the model is not the source of the discrepancy.
Vijay S. Mahadevan, Iulian Grindeanu, Robert Jacob, and Jason Sarich
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 2355–2377, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2355-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2355-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Accurate climate modeling of coupled Earth systems requires mapping of solution field data between dependent components that use non-matching discrete meshes. While existing workflows provide a pathway to generate the projection weights as an offline step, severe bottlenecks impede flexible setup of high-resolution models. In this paper, we present new algorithmic approaches to simplify the E3SM computational workflow using a scalable software infrastructure to generate the remapping operators.
Jerry F. Tjiputra, Jörg Schwinger, Mats Bentsen, Anne L. Morée, Shuang Gao, Ingo Bethke, Christoph Heinze, Nadine Goris, Alok Gupta, Yan-Chun He, Dirk Olivié, Øyvind Seland, and Michael Schulz
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 2393–2431, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2393-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2393-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Ocean biogeochemistry plays an important role in determining the atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration. Earth system models, which are regularly used to study and project future climate change, generally include an ocean biogeochemistry component. Prior to their application, such models are rigorously validated against real-world observations. In this study, we evaluate the ability of the ocean biogeochemistry in the Norwegian Earth System Model version 2 to simulate various datasets.
Tristan Vadsaria, Laurent Li, Gilles Ramstein, and Jean-Claude Dutay
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 2337–2354, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2337-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2337-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
This article aims to reproduce the Early Holocene climate over the Mediterranean basin, characterized with a large reorganization of the Mediterranean thermohaline circulation. In order to reduce the demand of strong computation resources, a comprehensive global-to-regional model architecture is developed and validated against paleo data. Beyond the case study shown here, this platform may be applied to a large number of paleoclimate contexts.
James A. Franke, Christoph Müller, Joshua Elliott, Alex C. Ruane, Jonas Jägermeyr, Juraj Balkovic, Philippe Ciais, Marie Dury, Pete D. Falloon, Christian Folberth, Louis François, Tobias Hank, Munir Hoffmann, R. Cesar Izaurralde, Ingrid Jacquemin, Curtis Jones, Nikolay Khabarov, Marian Koch, Michelle Li, Wenfeng Liu, Stefan Olin, Meridel Phillips, Thomas A. M. Pugh, Ashwan Reddy, Xuhui Wang, Karina Williams, Florian Zabel, and Elisabeth J. Moyer
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 2315–2336, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2315-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2315-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Concerns about food security under climate change motivate efforts to better understand future changes in crop yields. Crop models, which represent plant biology, are necessary tools for this purpose since they allow representing future climate, farmer choices, and new agricultural geographies. The Global Gridded Crop Model Intercomparison (GGCMI) Phase 2 experiment, under the Agricultural Model Intercomparison and Improvement Project (AgMIP), is designed to evaluate and improve crop models.
Vinicius Buscioli Capistrano, Paulo Nobre, Sandro F. Veiga, Renata Tedeschi, Josiane Silva, Marcus Bottino, Manoel Baptista da Silva Jr., Otacílio Leandro Menezes Neto, Silvio Nilo Figueroa, José Paulo Bonatti, Paulo Yoshio Kubota, Julio Pablo Reyes Fernandez, Emanuel Giarolla, Jessica Vial, and Carlos A. Nobre
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 2277–2296, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2277-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2277-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
This work represents the product of our recent efforts to develop a Brazilian climate model and helps address some scientific issues on the frontier of knowledge (e.g., cloud feedback studies). The BESM results show climate sensitivity and thermodynamical responses similar to a CMIP5 ensemble. More than that, BESM has the objective of being an additional climate model with the ability to reproduce changes that are physically understood in order to study the global climate system.
Tomohiro Hajima, Michio Watanabe, Akitomo Yamamoto, Hiroaki Tatebe, Maki A. Noguchi, Manabu Abe, Rumi Ohgaito, Akinori Ito, Dai Yamazaki, Hideki Okajima, Akihiko Ito, Kumiko Takata, Koji Ogochi, Shingo Watanabe, and Michio Kawamiya
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 2197–2244, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2197-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2197-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We developed a new Earth system model (ESM) named MIROC-ES2L. This model is based on a state-of-the-art climate model and includes carbon–nitrogen cycles for the land and multiple biogeochemical cycles for the ocean. The model's performances on reproducing historical climate and biogeochemical changes are confirmed to be reasonable, and the new model is likely to be an
optimisticmodel in projecting future climate change among ESMs in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6.
Charlotte Pascoe, Bryan N. Lawrence, Eric Guilyardi, Martin Juckes, and Karl E. Taylor
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 2149–2167, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2149-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2149-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We present a methodology for documenting numerical experiments in the context of an information sharing ecosystem which allows the weather, climate, and earth system modelling community to accurately document and share information about their modelling workflow. We describe how through iteration with a range of stakeholders, we rationalized multiple sources of information and improved the clarity of experimental definitions for the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6).
Rui Yang, Marshall Ward, and Ben Evans
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 1885–1902, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1885-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1885-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Parallel I/O is implemented in the Modular Ocean Model (MOM) with optimal performance over a range of tuning parameters of model configuration, netCDF, MPI-IO and Lustre filesystem. The scalable parallel I/O performance is observed at 0.1° resolution global model, and it could achieve up to 60 times faster in write speed relative to serial single-file I/O running on 960 PEs.
Gianluca Mussetti, Dominik Brunner, Stephan Henne, Jonas Allegrini, E. Scott Krayenhoff, Sebastian Schubert, Christian Feigenwinter, Roland Vogt, Andreas Wicki, and Jan Carmeliet
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 1685–1710, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1685-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1685-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Street trees are regarded as a powerful measure to reduce excessive heat in cities. To enable city-wide studies of the cooling effect of street trees, we developed a coupled urban climate model with explicit representation of street trees (COSMO-BEP-Tree). The model compares well with surface, flux and satellite observations and responds realistically to changes in tree characteristics. Street trees largely impact energy fluxes and wind speed, while air temperatures are only slightly reduced.
Joaquín Bedia, Jorge Baño-Medina, Mikel N. Legasa, Maialen Iturbide, Rodrigo Manzanas, Sixto Herrera, Ana Casanueva, Daniel San-Martín, Antonio S. Cofiño, and José Manuel Gutiérrez
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 1711–1735, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1711-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1711-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We introduce downscaleR, an open-source tool for statistical downscaling (SD) of climate information, implementing the most popular approaches and state-of-the-art techniques. It makes possible the development of end-to-end downscaling applications, from data retrieval to model building, validation, and prediction, bringing to climate scientists and practitioners a unique comprehensive framework for the development of complex and fully reproducible SD experiments.
Ignacio Hermoso de Mendoza, Hugo Beltrami, Andrew H. MacDougall, and Jean-Claude Mareschal
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 1663–1683, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1663-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1663-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We study the impact that the thickness of the subsurface and the geothermal gradient have in land models for climate simulations. To do this, we modify the Community Land Model version 4.5. In a scenario of rising atmospheric temperatures, the temperature of an insufficiently deep subsurface rises faster than it would in the real land. For the model, this produces faster permafrost thawing and increased emissions of land carbon to the atmosphere.
Benjamin N. O. Kuffour, Nicholas B. Engdahl, Carol S. Woodward, Laura E. Condon, Stefan Kollet, and Reed M. Maxwell
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 1373–1397, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1373-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1373-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Integrated hydrologic models (IHMs) were developed in order to allow for more accurate simulations of real-world ecohydrologic conditions. Many IHMs exist, and the literature can be dense, so it is often difficult to understand what a specific model can and cannot do. We provide a review of the current core capabilities, solution techniques, communication structure with other models, some limitations, and potential future improvements of one such open-source integrated model called ParFlow.
Danijel Belušić, Hylke de Vries, Andreas Dobler, Oskar Landgren, Petter Lind, David Lindstedt, Rasmus A. Pedersen, Juan Carlos Sánchez-Perrino, Erika Toivonen, Bert van Ulft, Fuxing Wang, Ulf Andrae, Yurii Batrak, Erik Kjellström, Geert Lenderink, Grigory Nikulin, Joni-Pekka Pietikäinen, Ernesto Rodríguez-Camino, Patrick Samuelsson, Erik van Meijgaard, and Minchao Wu
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 1311–1333, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1311-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1311-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
A new regional climate modelling system, HCLIM38, is presented and shown to be applicable in different regions ranging from the tropics to the Arctic. The main focus is on climate simulations at horizontal resolutions between 1 and 4 km, the so-called convection-permitting scales, even though the model can also be used at coarser resolutions. The benefits of simulating climate at convection-permitting scales are shown and are particularly evident for climate extremes.
Matthew Forrest, Holger Tost, Jos Lelieveld, and Thomas Hickler
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 1285–1309, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1285-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1285-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We have integrated the LPJ-GUESS dynamic global vegetation model into the EMAC atmospheric chemistry-enabled GCM (general circulation model). This combined framework will enable the investigation of many land–atmosphere interactions and feedbacks with state-of-the-art simulation models. Initial results show that using the climate produced by EMAC together with LPJ-GUESS produces an acceptable representation of the global vegetation.
Axel Lauer, Veronika Eyring, Omar Bellprat, Lisa Bock, Bettina K. Gier, Alasdair Hunter, Ruth Lorenz, Núria Pérez-Zanón, Mattia Righi, Manuel Schlund, Daniel Senftleben, Katja Weigel, and Sabrina Zechlau
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2020-60, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2020-60, 2020
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Mattia Righi, Bouwe Andela, Veronika Eyring, Axel Lauer, Valeriu Predoi, Manuel Schlund, Javier Vegas-Regidor, Lisa Bock, Björn Brötz, Lee de Mora, Faruk Diblen, Laura Dreyer, Niels Drost, Paul Earnshaw, Birgit Hassler, Nikolay Koldunov, Bill Little, Saskia Loosveldt Tomas, and Klaus Zimmermann
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 1179–1199, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1179-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1179-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
This paper describes the second major release of ESMValTool, a community diagnostic and performance metrics tool for the evaluation of Earth system models. This new version features a brand new design, with an improved interface and a revised preprocessor. It takes advantage of state-of-the-art computational libraries and methods to deploy efficient and user-friendly data processing, improving the performance over its predecessor by more than a factor of 30.
Miguel Nogueira, Clément Albergel, Souhail Boussetta, Frederico Johannsen, Isabel F Trigo, Sofia L Ermida, João P A Martins, and Emanuel Dutra
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2020-49, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2020-49, 2020
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
Short summary
We used earth observations to evaluate and improve the representation of Land Surface Temperature (LST) and vegetation coverage over Iberia in CHTESSEL and SURFEX Land Surface Models. We demonstrate the added value of updating the vegetation types and fractions together with the representation of vegetation coverage seasonality. Results show a large reduction of daily maximum LST systematic error during warm months, with neutral impacts in other seasons.
François Massonnet, Martin Ménégoz, Mario Acosta, Xavier Yepes-Arbós, Eleftheria Exarchou, and Francisco J. Doblas-Reyes
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 1165–1178, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1165-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1165-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Earth system models (ESMs) are one of the cornerstones of modern climate science. They are usually run on high-performance computers (HPCs). Whether the choice of HPC can affect the model results is a question of importance for optimizing the design of scientific studies. Here, we introduce a protocol for testing the replicability of the EC-Earth3 ESM across different HPCs. We find the simulation results to be replicable only if specific precautions are taken at the compilation stage.
Yadong Lei, Xu Yue, Hong Liao, Cheng Gong, and Lin Zhang
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 1137–1153, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1137-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1137-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We coupled a dynamic vegetation model YIBs with the chemical transport model GEOS-Chem to develop a new tool for studying interactions between atmospheric chemistry and biosphere. Within this framework, leaf area index and stomatal conductance are predicted for chemical simulations. In turn, surface ozone causes negative impacts to plant growth and the consequent dry deposition. Such interactions are important for air pollution prediction but ignored in most of current chemical models.
Adriano Vinca, Simon Parkinson, Edward Byers, Peter Burek, Zarrar Khan, Volker Krey, Fabio A. Diuana, Yaoping Wang, Ansir Ilyas, Alexandre C. Köberle, Iain Staffell, Stefan Pfenninger, Abubakr Muhammad, Andrew Rowe, Roberto Schaeffer, Narasimha D. Rao, Yoshihide Wada, Ned Djilali, and Keywan Riahi
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 1095–1121, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1095-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1095-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
This article describes a newly developed numerical model that can assess impacts of long-term policies for the energy, water and land (WEL) sectors at the scale of a river basin. We show the importance of having an integrated method when jointly considering multiple policies as opposed to conventional sectoral analysis. This model can be useful for studying river basins, such as the Indus basin, that are exposed to challenges over WEL sectors, like water scarcity or food and energy access.
Emma W. Littleton, Anna B. Harper, Naomi E. Vaughan, Rebecca J. Oliver, Maria Carolina Duran-Rojas, and Timothy M. Lenton
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 1123–1136, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1123-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1123-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
This study presents new functionality to represent bioenergy crops and harvests in JULES, a land surface model. Such processes must be explicitly represented before the environmental effects of large-scale bioenergy production can be fully evaluated, using Earth system modelling. This new functionality allows for many types of bioenergy plants and harvesting regimes to be simulated, such as perennial grasses, short rotation coppicing, and forestry rotations.
Alessio Bozzo, Angela Benedetti, Johannes Flemming, Zak Kipling, and Samuel Rémy
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 1007–1034, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1007-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1007-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Aerosols are tiny particles of natural and anthropogenic origin transported by the winds in the Earth's atmosphere. These particles play a key role in the energy budget of our planet. In numerical models of the Earth's atmosphere, aerosols spatial distribution are often represented by conditions averaged over several years. We prepared a new aerosol climatology and used it in a numerical weather model. We show that in certain regions aerosols can affect the quality of numerical weather forecast.
Tongwen Wu, Fang Zhang, Jie Zhang, Weihua Jie, Yanwu Zhang, Fanghua Wu, Laurent Li, Jinghui Yan, Xiaohong Liu, Xiao Lu, Haiyue Tan, Lin Zhang, Jun Wang, and Aixue Hu
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 977–1005, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-977-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-977-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
This paper describes the first version of the Beijing Climate Center (BCC) fully coupled Earth System Model with interactive atmospheric chemistry and aerosols (BCC-ESM1). It is one of the models at the BCC for the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6). The CMIP6 Aerosol Chemistry Model Intercomparison Project (AerChemMIP) experiment using BCC-ESM1 has been finished. The evaluations show an overall good agreement between BCC-ESM1 simulations and observations in the 20th century.
Mathieu Jonard, Frédéric André, François de Coligny, Louis de Wergifosse, Nicolas Beudez, Hendrik Davi, Gauthier Ligot, Quentin Ponette, and Caroline Vincke
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 905–935, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-905-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-905-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
To explore the forest response to new forestry practices under a changing environment, one needs models combining a process-based approach with a detailed spatial representation, which is very rare. We decided to develop our own model according to a spatially explicit approach describing individual tree growth based on resource sharing (light, water and nutrients). A first evaluation showed that HETEROFOR predicts well individual radial growth and is able to reproduce size–growth relationships.
Simon Michel, Didier Swingedouw, Marie Chavent, Pablo Ortega, Juliette Mignot, and Myriam Khodri
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 841–858, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-841-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-841-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Natural archives such as sediments, ice, tree rings or speleothems provide indirect observations of past climate at local and regional scales. In this paper, we provide a computational device to properly make evaluated reconstructions of climate indices using these paleo-data. It provides optimizing cross-validation algorithms and four regression methods that are applied to the reconstruction of the North Atlantic Oscillation index and compared in this study.
Sandy P. Harrison, Marie-José Gaillard, Benjamin D. Stocker, Marc Vander Linden, Kees Klein Goldewijk, Oliver Boles, Pascale Braconnot, Andria Dawson, Etienne Fluet-Chouinard, Jed O. Kaplan, Thomas Kastner, Francesco S. R. Pausata, Erick Robinson, Nicki J. Whitehouse, Marco Madella, and Kathleen D. Morrison
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 805–824, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-805-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-805-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The Past Global Changes LandCover6k initiative will use archaeological records to refine scenarios of land use and land cover change through the Holocene to reduce the uncertainties about the impacts of human-induced changes before widespread industrialization. We describe how archaeological data are used to map land use change and how the maps can be evaluated using independent palaeoenvironmental data. We propose simulations to test land use and land cover change impacts on past climates.
Takasumi Kurahashi-Nakamura, André Paul, Guy Munhoven, Ute Merkel, and Michael Schulz
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 825–840, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-825-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-825-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Chemical processes in ocean-floor sediments have a large influence on the marine carbon cycle, hence the global climate, at long timescales. We developed a new coupling scheme for a chemical sediment model and a comprehensive climate model. The new coupled model outperformed the original uncoupled climate model in reproducing the global distribution of sediment properties. The sediment model will also act as a
bridgebetween the ocean model and paleoceanographic data.
Rein Haarsma, Mario Acosta, Rena Bakhshi, Pierre-Antoine Bretonnière Bretonnière, Louis-Philippe Caron, Miguel Castrillo, Susanna Corti, Paolo Davini, Eleftheria Exarchou, Federico Fabiano, Uwe Fladrich, Ramon Fuentes Franco, Javier García-Serrano, Jost von Hardenberg, Torben Koenigk, Xavier Levine, Virna Meccia, Twan van Noije, Gijs van den Oord, Froila M. Palmeiro, Mario Rodrigo, Yohan Ruprich-Robert, Philippe Le Sager, Étienne Tourigny, Shiyu Wang, Michiel van Weele, and Klaus Wyser
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2019-350, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2019-350, 2020
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
Short summary
HighResMIP is an international coordinated CMIP6 effort to investigate the improvement in climate modelling caused by an increase in horizontal resolution. This paper describes EC-Earth3P-(HR) that has been developed for HighResMIP. First analyses reveal that increasing resolution does improve certain aspects of the simulated climate, but that many other biases still continue, possibly related to phenomena that are still not yet resolved and need to be parameterized.
Lin Yu, Bernhard Ahrens, Thomas Wutzler, Marion Schrumpf, and Sönke Zaehle
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 783–803, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-783-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-783-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
In this paper, we have developed a new soil organic carbon model that describes the formation and turnover of soil organic matter in a more mechanistic manner. With this model, we are able to better represent how microorganisms and nutrient processes influence the below-ground carbon storage and better explain some observed features of soil organic matter. We hope this model can increase our confidence in predictions of future climate change, particularly on how soil can mitigate the process.
John T. Fasullo
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2020-1, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2020-1, 2020
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
Short summary
The fidelity of climate model simulations included in the WCRP Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Versions 3 through 6 is evaluated using best-estimates of fields considered by the community to be critical for climate change projections. The analysis benchmarks patterns of the mean state and variability (seasonal/interannual) both within and across model generations, highlighting progress and quantifying persisting biases across models.
Nicholas A. Davis, Sean M. Davis, Robert W. Portmann, Eric Ray, Karen H. Rosenlof, and Pengfei Yu
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 717–734, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-717-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-717-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Large-scale waves drive upward motion in the tropical stratosphere, with major impacts on stratospheric chemistry and climate. However, some of the modeling methods which attempt to simulate the past evolution of the stratosphere do not seem to be able to recreate important trends. We believe this is due to disagreements between the basic climate of the model and observations, but if the method is constructed more carefully, the disagreement becomes smaller and the trends become more realistic.
Nadine Mengis, David P. Keller, Andrew MacDougall, Michael Eby, Nesha Wright, Katrin J. Meissner, Andreas Oschlies, Andreas Schmittner, H. Damon Matthews, and Kirsten Zickfeld
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2019-373, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2019-373, 2020
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
Short summary
In this manuscript we evaluate the newest version of the University of Victoria Earth System Climate Model (UVic ESCM 2.10). Combining recent model developments as a joint effort, this version is to be used the next phase of model inter-comparison and climate change studies. The UVic ESCM 2.10 is capable of reproducing well changes in historical temperature and carbon fluxes, as well as the distribution of many ocean tracers.
James Franke, Christoph Müller, Joshua Elliott, Alex C. Ruane, Jonas Jägermeyr, Abigail Snyder, Marie Dury, Pete Falloon, Christian Folberth, Louis François, Tobias Hank, R. Cesar Izaurralde, Ingrid Jacquemin, Curtis Jones, Michelle Li, Wenfeng Liu, Stefan Olin, Meridel Phillips, Thomas A. M. Pugh, Ashwan Reddy, Karina Williams, Ziwei Wang, Florian Zabel, and Elisabeth Moyer
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2019-365, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2019-365, 2020
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
Short summary
Improving our understanding of the impacts of climate change on crop yields will be critical for global food security in the next century. The models often used to study the how climate change may impact agriculture are complex and costly to run. In this work we describe a set of global crop model emulators (simplified models) developed under the Agricultural Model Intercomparison Project. Crop model emulators make agricultural simulations more accessible to policy or decision makers.
Andrew J. Wiltshire, Maria Carolina Duran Rojas, John M. Edwards, Nicola Gedney, Anna B. Harper, Andrew J. Hartley, Margaret A. Hendry, Eddy Robertson, and Kerry Smout-Day
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 483–505, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-483-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-483-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We present the Global Land (GL) configuration of the Joint UK Land Environment Simulator (JULES). JULES-GL7 can be used to simulate the exchange of heat, water and momentum over land and is therefore applicable for helping understand past and future changes, and forms the land component of the HadGEM3-GC3.1 climate model. The configuration is freely available subject to licence restrictions.
Leyang Feng, Steven J. Smith, Caleb Braun, Monica Crippa, Matthew J. Gidden, Rachel Hoesly, Zbigniew Klimont, Margreet van Marle, Maarten van den Berg, and Guido R. van der Werf
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 461–482, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-461-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-461-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We describe the methods used for generating gridded emission datasets produced for use by the modeling community, particularly for the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6). The development of three sets of gridded data (historical open burning, historical anthropogenic, and future scenarios) was coordinated to produce consistent data over 1750–2100. We discuss the methodologies used to produce these data along with limitations and potential for future work.
Andrew E. Kiss, Andrew McC. Hogg, Nicholas Hannah, Fabio Boeira Dias, Gary B. Brassington, Matthew A. Chamberlain, Christopher Chapman, Peter Dobrohotoff, Catia M. Domingues, Earl R. Duran, Matthew H. England, Russell Fiedler, Stephen M. Griffies, Aidan Heerdegen, Petra Heil, Ryan M. Holmes, Andreas Klocker, Simon J. Marsland, Adele K. Morrison, James Munroe, Maxim Nikurashin, Peter R. Oke, Gabriela S. Pilo, Océane Richet, Abhishek Savita, Paul Spence, Kial D. Stewart, Marshall L. Ward, Fanghua Wu, and Xihan Zhang
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 401–442, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-401-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-401-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We describe new computer model configurations which simulate the global ocean and sea ice at three resolutions. The coarsest resolution is suitable for multi-century climate projection experiments, whereas the finest resolution is designed for more detailed studies over time spans of decades. The paper provides technical details of the model configurations and an assessment of their performance relative to observations.
Naika Meili, Gabriele Manoli, Paolo Burlando, Elie Bou-Zeid, Winston T. L. Chow, Andrew M. Coutts, Edoardo Daly, Kerry A. Nice, Matthias Roth, Nigel J. Tapper, Erik Velasco, Enrique R. Vivoni, and Simone Fatichi
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 335–362, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-335-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-335-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We developed a novel urban ecohydrological model (UT&C v1.0) that is able to account for the effects of different plant types on the urban climate and hydrology, as well as the effects of the urban environment on plant well-being and performance. UT&C performs well when compared against energy flux measurements in three cities in different climates (Singapore, Melbourne, Phoenix) and can be used to assess urban climate mitigation strategies that aim at increasing or changing urban green cover.
Wei-Liang Lee, Yi-Chi Wang, Chein-Jung Shiu, I-chun Tsai, Chia-Ying Tu, Yung-Yao Lan, Jen-Ping Chen, Hau-Lu Pan, and Huang-Hsiung Hsu
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2019-377, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2019-377, 2020
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
Short summary
Taiwan Earth System Model (TaiESM) is a new climate model developed in Taiwan. It includes several new features, and therefore it can better simulate the occurrence of convective rainfall, solar energy received by mountainous surfaces, and more detail chemical processes in aerosols. TaiESM can well capture the trend of global warming after 1950, and its overall performance in most meteorological quantities is better than the average of global models used in IPCC AR5.
Salomon Eliasson, Karl-Göran Karlsson, and Ulrika Willén
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 297–314, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-297-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-297-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
This paper describes a new satellite simulator. Its purpose is to simulate the CLARA-A2 climate data record from a climate model atmosphere. We explain how the simulator takes into account the regionally variable cloud detection skill of the observations. The simulator makes use of the long/lat-gridded validation between CLARA-A2 and the CALIOP satellite-borne lidar dataset. Using the EC-Earth climate model, we show a sizable impact on climate model validation, especially at high latitudes.
Cited articles
Adler, R. F., Huffman, G. J., Chang, A., Ferraro, R., Xie, P. P., Janowiak,
J., Rudolf, B., Schneider, U., Curtis, S., Bolvin, D., Gruber, A., Susskind,
J., Arkin, P., and Nelkin, E.: The Version 2 Global Precipitation Climatology
Project (GPCP) Monthly Precipitation Analysis (1979-0Present), J.
Hydrometeor., 4, 1147–1167,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1525-7541(2003)004<1147:TVGPCP>2.0.CO;2, 2003.
Allen, M.: Do-it-yourself climate prediction, Nature, 401, 642,
https://doi.org/10.1038/44266, 1999.
Annan, J. D. and Hargreaves, J. C.: Efficient estimation and ensemble
generation in climate modelling, Philos. T. Roy. Soc. A, 365, 2077–2088,
2007.
Annan, J. D., Lunt, D. J., Hargreaves, J. C., and Valdes, P. J.: Parameter
estimation in an atmospheric GCM using the Ensemble Kalman Filter, Nonlin.
Processes Geophys., 12, 363–371, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-12-363-2005,
2005.
Bellprat, O., Kotlarski, S., Lüthi, D., and Schär, C.: Exploring
perturbed physics ensembles in a regional climate model, J. Climate, 25,
4582–4599, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00275.1, 2012a.
Bellprat, O., Kotlarski, S., Lüthi, D., and Schär, C.: Objective
calibration of regional climate models, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, D23115,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD018262, 2012b.
Bellprat, O., Kotlarski, S., Lüthi, D., De Elía, R., Frigon, A.,
Laprise, R., and Schär, C.: Objective calibration of regional climate
models: application over Europe and North America, J. Climate, 29, 819–838,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0302.1, 2016.
Boberg, F. and Christensen, J. H.: Overestimation of Mediterranean summer
temperature projections due to model deficiencies, Nat. Clim. Change, 2,
433–436, https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1454, 2012.
Booth, B. B. B., Jones, C. D., Collins, M., Totterdell, I. J., Cox, P. M.,
Sitch, S., Huntingford, C., Betts, R. A., Harris, G. R., and Lloyd, J.: High
sensitivity of future global warming to land carbon cycle processes, Environ.
Res. Lett., 7, 024002, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/7/2/024002, 2012.
Brown, T. J., Hall, B. L., and Westerling, A. L.: The impact of twenty-first
century climate change on wildland fire danger in the western United States:
an applications perspective, Climatic Change, 62, 365–388, 2004.
Carslaw, K. S., Lee, L. A., Reddington, C. L., Pringle, K. J., Rap, A.,
Forster, P. M., Mann, G. W., Spracklen, D. V., Woodhouse, M. T., Regayre, L.
A., and Pierce, J. R.: Large contribution of natural aerosols to uncertainty
in indirect forcing, Nature, 503, 67–71, 2013.
Cheruy, F., Dufresne, J. L., Hourdin, F., and Ducharne, A.: Role of clouds
and land-atmosphere coupling in midlatitude continental summer warm biases
and climate change amplification in CMIP5 simulations, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
41, 6493–6500, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL061145, 2014.
Collins, M., Booth, B. B., Harris, G. R., Murphy, J. M., Sexton, D. M., and
Webb, M. J.: Towards quantifying uncertainty in transient climate change,
Clim. Dynam., 27, 127–147, 2006.
Collins, M., Booth, B. B., Bhaskaran, B., Harris, G. R., Murphy, J. M.,
Sexton, D. M., and Webb, M. J.: Climate model errors, feedbacks and forcings:
a comparison of perturbed physics and multi-model ensembles, Clim. Dynam.,
36, 1737–1766, 2011.
Collins, W. J., Bellouin, N., Doutriaux-Boucher, M., Gedney, N., Hinton, T.,
Jones, C. D., Liddicoat, S., Martin, G., O'Connor, F., Rae, J., Senior, C.,
Totterdell, I., Woodward, S., Reichler, T., and Kim, J.: Evaluation of the
HadGEM2 model, Hadley Cent. Tech. Note, 74, Met Office Hadley Centre, Exter, UK, 2008.
Compo, G. P., Whitaker, J. S., Sardeshmukh, P. D., Matsui, N., Allan, R. J.,
Yin, X., Gleason, B. E., Vose, R. S., Rutledge, G., Bessemoulin, P.,
Brönnimann, S., Brunet, M., Crouthamel, R. I., Grant, A. N., Groisman, P.
Y., Jones, P. D., Kruk, M. C., Kruger, A. C., Marshall, G. J., Maugeri, M.,
Mok, H. Y., Nordli, Ø., Ross, T. F., Trigo, R. M., Wang, X. L., Woodruff,
S. D., and Worley, S. J.: The Twentieth Century Reanalysis Project, Q. J.
Roy. Meteor. Soc., 137, 1–28, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.776, 2011.
Cox, P. M., Betts, R. A., Bunton, C. B., Essery, R. L. H., Rowntree, P. R.,
and Smith, J.: The impact of new land surface physics on the GCM simulation
of climate and climate sensitivity, Clim. Dynam., 15, 183–203, 1999.
Daly, C., Halbleib, M., Smith, J. I., Gibson, W. P., Doggett, M. K., Taylor,
G. H., Curtis, J., and Pasteris, P. P.: Physiographically sensitive mapping
of climatological temperature and precipitation across the conterminous
United States, Int. J. Climatol., 28, 2031–2064, 2008.
Dee, D. P., Uppala, S. M., Simmons, A. J., Berrisford, P., Poli, P.,
Kobayashi, S., Andrae, U., Balmaseda, M. A., Balsamo, G., Bauer, P.,
Bechtold, P., Beljaars, A. C. M., van de Berg, L., Bidlot, J., Bormann, N.,
Delsol, C., Dragani, R., Fuentes, M., Geer, A. J., Haimberger, L., Healy, S.
B., Hersbach, H., Hólm, E. V., Isaksen, L., Kållberg, P., Köhler,
M., Matricardi, M., McNally, A. P., Monge-Sanz, B. M., Morcrette, J. J.,
Park, B. K., Peubey, C., de Rosnay, P., Tavolato, C., Thépaut, J. N., and
Vitart, F.: The ERA-Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the
data assimilation system, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 137, 553–597, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.828, 2011.
Essery, R. L. H., Best, M. J., Betts, R. A., Cox, P. M., and Taylor, C. M.:
Explicit Representation of Subgrid Heterogeneity in a GCM Land Surface
Scheme, J. Hydrometeorol., 4, 530–543,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1525-7541(2003)004<0530:EROSHI>2.0.CO;2, 2003.
Fan, Y. and van den Dool, H.: A Global Monthly Land Surface Air Temperature
Analysis for 1948–Present, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D01103, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008470,
2008.
Fowler, H. J., Blenkinsop, S., and Tebaldi, C.: Linking climate change
modelling to impacts studies: recent advances in downscaling techniques for
hydrological modelling, Int. J. Climatol., 27, 1547–1578, 2007.
Gelaro, R., McCarty, W., Suárez, M. J., Todling, R., Molod, A., Takacs,
L., Randles, C. A., Darmenov, A., Bosilovich, M. G., Reichle, R., and Wargan,
K.: The modern-era retrospective analysis for research and applications,
version 2 (MERRA-2), J. Climate, 30, 5419–5454,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0758.1, 2017.
Gordon, C., Cooper, C., Senior, C. A., Banks, H., Gregory, J. M., Johns, T. C., Mitchell, J. F., and Wood, R. A.: The simulation of SST, sea ice extents and ocean heat transports in a version of the Hadley Centre coupled model without flux adjustments, Clim. Dynam., 16, 147–168, 2000.
Gregory, D. and Rowntree, P. R.: A mass flux convection scheme with
representation of cloud ensemble characteristics and stability-dependent
closure, Mon. Weather Rev., 118, 1483–1506, 1990.
Guillod, B. P., Jones, R. G., Bowery, A., Haustein, K., Massey, N. R.,
Mitchell, D. M., Otto, F. E. L., Sparrow, S. N., Uhe, P., Wallom, D. C. H.,
Wilson, S., and Allen, M. R.: weather@home 2: validation of an improved
global–regional climate modelling system, Geosci. Model Dev., 10,
1849–1872, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-1849-2017, 2017.
Guillod, B. P., Jones, R. G., Dadson, S. J., Coxon, G., Bussi, G., Freer, J.,
Kay, A. L., Massey, N. R., Sparrow, S. N., Wallom, D. C. H., Allen, M. R.,
and Hall, J. W.: A large set of potential past, present and future
hydro-meteorological time series for the UK, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22,
611–634, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-611-2018, 2018.
Hall, A. and Qu, X.: Using the current seasonal cycle to constrain snow
albedo feedback in future climate change, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L03502, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL025127,
2006.
Harris, G. R., Sexton, D. M., Booth, B. B., Collins, M., and Murphy, J. M.:
Probabilistic projections of transient climate change, Clim. Dynam., 40,
2937–2972, 2013.
Harris, I. P. D. J., Jones, P. D., Osborn, T. J., and Lister, D. H.: Updated
high-resolution grids of monthly climatic observations–the CRU TS3. 10
Dataset, Int. J. Climatol., 34, 623–642, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3711, 2014.
Hartmann, D. L., Ockert-Bell, M. E., and Michelsen, M. L.: The effect of
cloud type on Earth's energy balance: Global analysis, J. Climate, 5,
1281–1304, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1992)005<1281:TEOCTO>2.0.CO;2, 1992.
Hawkins, E., Osborne, T. M., Ho, C. K., and Challinor, A. J.: Calibration and
bias correction of climate projections for crop modelling: an idealised case
study over Europe, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 170, 19–31, 2013.
Hourdin, F., Grandpeix, J.-Y., Rio, C., Bony, S., Jam, A., Cheruy, F.,
Rochetin, N., Fairhead, L., Idelkadi, A., Musat, I., Dufresne, J. L.,
Lahellec, A., Lefebvre, M.-P., and Roehrig, R.: LMDZ5B: the atmospheric
component of the IPSL climate model with revisited parameterizations for
clouds and convection, Clim. Dynam., 40, 2193–2222,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-012-1343-y, 2013.
Huffman, G., Bolvin, D., Braithwaite, D., Hsu, K., Joyce, R., and Xie, P:
Integrated Multi-satellitE Retrievals for GPM (IMERG), version 4.4. NASA's
Precipitation Processing Center, available at:
ftp://arthurhou.pps.eosdis.nasa.gov/gpmdata/ (last access: 31 March
2015), 2014.
Irvine, P. J., Gregoire, L. J., Lunt, D. J., and Valdes, P. J.: An efficient
method to generate a perturbed parameter ensemble of a fully coupled AOGCM
without flux-adjustment, Geosci. Model Dev., 6, 1447–1462,
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-1447-2013, 2013.
Jackson, C., Sen, M. K., and Stoffa, P. L.: An efficient stochastic Bayesian
approach to optimal parameter and uncertainty estimation for climate model
predictions, J. Climate, 17, 2828–2841, 2004.
Jackson, C. S., Sen, M. K., Huerta, G., Deng, Y., and Bowman, K. P.: Error
reduction and convergence in climate prediction, J. Climate, 21, 6698–6709,
2008.
Järvinen, H., Räisänen, P., Laine, M., Tamminen, J., Ilin, A.,
Oja, E., Solonen, A., and Haario, H.: Estimation of ECHAM5 climate model
closure parameters with adaptive MCMC, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 9993–10002,
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-9993-2010, 2010.
Johns, T. C., Durman, C. F., Banks, H. T., Roberts, M. J., McLaren, A. J.,
Ridley, J. K., Senior, C. A., Williams, K. D., Jones, A., Rickard, G. J.,
Cusack, S., Ingram, W. I., Crucifix, M., Sexton, D. M. H., Joshi, M. M.,
Dong, B.-W., Spencer, H., Hill, R. S. R., Gregory, J. M., Keen, A. B.,
Pardaens, A. K., Lowe, J. A., Bodas-Salcedo, A., Stark, S., and Searl, Y.:
The new Hadley Centre climate model (HadGEM1): Evaluation of coupled
simulations, J. Climate, 19, 1327–1353, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3712.1, 2006.
Kalnay, E., Kanamitsu, M., Kistler, R., Collins, W., Deaven, D., Gandin, L.,
Iredell, M., Saha, S., White, G., Woollen, J., Zhu, Y., Chelliah, M.,
Ebisuzaki, W., Higgins, W., Janowiak, J., Mo, K. C., Ropelewski, C., Wang,
J., Leetmaa, A., Reynolds, R., Jenne, R., and Joseph, D.: The NCEP/NCAR
40-Year Reanalysis Project, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 77, 437–471, 1996.
Karmalkar, A. V., Sexton, D. M., Murphy, J. M., Booth, B. B., Rostron, J. W.,
and McNeall, D. J.: Finding plausible and diverse variants of a climate
model. Part II: development and validation of methodology, Clim. Dynam.,
53, 847–877, 2019.
Knutti, R., Stocker, T. F., Joos, F., and Plattner, G. K.: Probabilistic
climate change projections using neural networks, Clim. Dynam., 21, 257–272,
2003.
Kotlarski, S., Keuler, K., Christensen, O. B., Colette, A., Déqué,
M., Gobiet, A., Goergen, K., Jacob, D., Lüthi, D., van Meijgaard, E.,
Nikulin, G., Schär, C., Teichmann, C., Vautard, R., Warrach-Sagi, K., and
Wulfmeyer, V.: Regional climate modeling on European scales: a joint standard
evaluation of the EURO-CORDEX RCM ensemble, Geosci. Model Dev., 7,
1297–1333, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-1297-2014, 2014.
Langenbrunner, B., Neelin, J. D., Lintner, B. R., and Anderson, B. T.:
Patterns of precipitation change and climatological uncertainty among CMIP5
models, with a focus on the midlatitude Pacific storm track, J. Climate, 28,
7857–7872, 2015.
Li, S., Mote, P. W., Rupp, D. E., Vickers, D., Mera, R., and Allen, M. R.:
Evaluation of a regional climate modeling effort for the western United
States using a superensemble from weather@ home, J. Climate, 28, 7470–7488,
2015.
Liu, C., Ikeda, K., Rasmussen, R., Barlage, M., Newman, A. J., Prein, A. F.,
Chen, F., Chen, L., Clark, M., Dai, A. Dudhia, J., Eidhammer, T., Gochis, D.,
Gutmann, E., Kurkute, S., Li, Y., Thompson, G., and Yates, D.:
Continental-scale convection-permitting modeling of the current and future
climate of North America, Clim. Dynam, 49, 71–95,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-3327-9, 2017.
Loeppky, J. L., Sacks, J., and Welch, W. J.: Choosing the Sample Size of a
Computer Experiment: a Practical Guide, Technometrics, 51, 366–376, 2009.
Ma, H. Y., Klein, S. A., Xie, S., Zhang, C., Tang, S., Tang, Q., Morcrette,
C. J., Van Weverberg, K., Petch, J., Ahlgrimm, M., Berg, L. K., Cheruy, F.,
Cole, J., Forbes, R., Gustafson Jr., W. I., Huang, M., Liu, Y., Merryfield,
W., Qian, Y., Roehrig, R., and Wang, Y.-C.: CAUSES: On the role of surface
energy budget errors to the warm surface air temperature error over the
Central United States, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123, 2888–2909,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027194, 2018.
Massey, N., Jones, R., Otto, F. E. L., Aina, T., Wilson, S., Murphy, J. M.,
Hassell, D., Yamazaki, Y. H., and Allen, M. R.: weather@home – development
and validation of a very large ensemble modelling system for probabilistic
event attribution, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 141, 1528–1545,
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2455, 2015.
Mauritsen, T., Stevens, B., Roeckner, E., Crueger, T., Esch, M., Giorgetta,
M., Haak, H., Jungclaus, J., Klocke, D., Matei, D., Mikolajewicz, U., Notz,
D., Pincus, R., Schmidt, H., and Tomassini, L.: Tuning the climate of a
global model, J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 4, M00A01,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2012MS000154, 2012.
McKay, M. D., Beckman, R. J., and Conover, W. J.: Comparison of three methods
for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a
computer code, Technometrics, 21, 239–245, 1979.
McNeall, D. J., Challenor, P. G., Gattiker, J. R., and Stone, E. J.: The
potential of an observational data set for calibration of a computationally
expensive computer model, Geosci. Model Dev., 6, 1715–1728,
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-1715-2013, 2013.
McNeall, D., Williams, J., Booth, B., Betts, R., Challenor, P., Wiltshire,
A., and Sexton, D.: The impact of structural error on parameter constraint in
a climate model, Earth Syst. Dynam., 7, 917–935,
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-7-917-2016, 2016.
Mearns, L. O., Arritt, R., Biner, S., Bukovsky, M. S., McGinnis, S., Sain,
S., Caya, D., Correia Jr., J., Flory, D., Gutowski, W., Takle, E. S., Jones,
R., Leung, R., Moufouma-Okia, W., McDaniel, L., Nues, A. M. B., Qian, Y.,
Roads, J., Sloan., L., and Snyder, M.: The North American regional climate
change assessment program: overview of phase I results, B. Am. Meteorol.
Soc., 93, 1337–1362, 2012.
Merrifield, A. L. and Xie, S. P.: Summer US surface air temperature
variability: Controlling factors and AMIP simulation biases, J. Climate, 29,
5123–5139, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0705.1, 2016.
Mitchell, D., Heaviside, C., Vardoulakis, S., Huntingford, C., Masato, G.,
Guillod, B. P., Frumhoff, P., Bowery, A., Wallom, D., and Allen, M.:
Attributing human mortality during extreme heat waves to anthropogenic
climate change, Environ. Res. Lett., 11, 074006,
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/7/074006, 2016.
Mock, C. J.: Climatic Controls and Spatial Variations of Precipitation in the
Western United States, J. Climate, 9, 1111–1125, 1996.
Morcrette, C. J., Van Weverberg, K., Ma, H. Y., Ahlgrimm, M., Bazile, E.,
Berg, L. K., Cheng, A., Cheruy, F., Cole, J., Forbes, R., and Gustafson Jr.,
W. I.: Introduction to CAUSES: Description of weather and climate models and
their near-surface temperature errors in 5 day hindcasts near the Southern
Great Plains, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123, 2655–2683,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027199, 2018.
Mote, P. W., Allen, M. R., Jones, R. G., Li, S., Mera, R., Rupp, D. E.,
Salahuddin, A., and Vickers, D.: Superensemble regional climate modeling for
the western United States, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 97, 203–215,
https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00090.1, 2016.
Mueller, B. and Seneviratne. S. I.: Systematic land climate and
evapotranspiration biases in CMIP5 simulations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41,
128–134, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013GL058055, 2014.
Mulholland, D. P., Haines, K., Sparrow, S. N., and Wallom, D.: Climate model
forecast biases assessed with a perturbed physics ensemble, Clim. Dynam., 49,
1729–1746, 2017.
Murphy, J. M., Sexton, D. M. H., Barnett, D. N., Jones, G. S., Webb, M. J.,
Collins, M., and Stainforth, D. A.: Quantification of modelling uncertainties
in a large ensemble of climate change simulations, Nature, 430, 768–772,
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02771, 2004.
Murphy, J. M., Booth, B. B., Collins, M., Harris, G. R., Sexton, D. M., and
Webb, M. J.: A methodology for probabilistic predictions of regional climate
change from perturbed physics ensembles. Philos. T. Roy. Soc. A, 365,
1993–2028, 2007.
Murphy, J. M., Sexton, D. M. H., Jenkins, G. J., Boorman, P. M., Booth, B. B. B., Brown, C. C., Clark, R. T., Collins, M., Harris, G. R., Kendon, E. J., and Betts, R. A.: UK climate projections science report: climate change projections, Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter, UK, 21–35, 2009.
Neelin, J. D., Bracco, A., Luo, H., McWilliams, J. C., and Meyerson, J. E.:
Considerations for parameter optimization and sensitivity in climate models,
P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 21349–21354, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1015473107,
2010.
Neelin, J. D., Langenbrunner, B., Meyerson, J. E., Hall, A., and Berg, N.:
California winter precipitation change under global warming in the Coupled
Model Intercomparison Project phase 5 ensemble, J. Climate, 26, 6238–6256,
2013.
Onogi, K., Tsutsui, J., Koide, H., Sakamoto, M., Kobayashi, S., Hatsushika,
H., Matsumoto, T., Yamazaki, N., Kamahori, H., Takahashi, K., Kadokura, S.,
Wada, K., Kato, K., Oyama, R., Ose, T., Mannoji, N., and Taira, R.: The
JRA-25 Reanalysis, J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn., 85, 369–432,
https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.85.369, 2007.
Otto, F. E. L., Massey, N., van Oldenborgh, G. J., Jones, R. G., and Allen,
M. R.: Reconciling Two Approaches to Attribution of the 2010 Russian Heat
Wave, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L04702, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL050422, 2012.
Rosenzweig, C., Elliott, J., Deryng, D., Ruane, A. C., Müller, C.,
Arneth, A., Boote, K. J., Folberth, C., Glotter, M., Khabarov, N., Neumann,
K., Piontek, F., Pugh, T. A. M., Schmid, E., Stehfest, E., Yang, H., and
Jones, J. W.: Assessing agricultural risks of climate change in the 21st
century in a global gridded crop model intercomparison, P. Natl. Acad. Sci.
USA, 111, 3268–3273, 2014.
Rougier, J. C., Sexton, D. M. H., Murphy, J. M., and Stainforth, D.:
Analyzing the climate sensitivity of the HadSM3 climate model using ensembles
from different but related experiments, J. Climate, 22, 3540–3557,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JCLI2533.1, 2009.
Roustant, O., Ginsbourger, D., and Deville, Y.: DiceKriging, DiceOptim: Two R
Packages for the Analysis of Computer Experiments by Kriging-Based
Metamodeling and Optimization, J. Stat. Softw., 51, p. 54, 2012.
Rowlands, D. J., Frame, D. J., Ackerley, D., Aina, T., Booth, B. B.,
Christensen, C., and Gryspeerdt, E.: Broad range of 2050 warming from an
observationally constrained large climate model ensemble, Nat. Geosci., 5,
256–260, 2012.
Rupp, D. E. and Li, S.: Less warming projected during heavy winter
precipitation in the Cascades and Sierra Nevada, Int. J. Climatol., 37,
3984–3990, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4963, 2017.
Rupp, D. E., Li, S., Mote, P. W., Massey, N., Sparrow, S. N., and Wallom, D.
C.: Influence of the Ocean and Greenhouse Gases on Severe Drought Likelihood
in the Central US in 2012, J. Climate, 30, 1789–1806,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0294.1, 2017a.
Rupp, D. E., Li, S., Mote, P. W., Shell, K. M., Massey, N., Sparrow, S. N.,
Wallom, D. C. H., and Allen, M. R.: Seasonal Spatial Patterns of Projected
Anthropogenic Warming in Complex Terrain: A Modeling Study of the Western
USA, Clim. Dynam., 48, 2191–2213, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-3200-x, 2017b.
Saha, S., Moorthi, S., Pan, H.L., Wu, X., Wang, J., Nadiga, S., Tripp, P.,
Kistler, R., Woollen, J., Behringer, D., and Liu, H.: The NCEP climate
forecast system reanalysis, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 91, 1015–1058, 2010.
Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., and Chan, K. S.: A quantitative
model-independent method for global sensitivity analysis of model output,
Technometrics, 41, 39–56, 1999.
Sanderson, B. M.: A multimodel study of parametric uncertainty in predictions
of climate response to rising greenhouse gas concentrations, J. Climate, 24,
1362–1377, 2011.
Sanderson, B. M., Knutti, R., Aina, T., Christensen, C., Faull, N., Frame, D.
J., Ingram, W. J., Piani, C., Stainforth, D. A., Stone, D. A., and Allen, M.
R.: Constraints on model response to greenhouse gas forcing and the role of
subgrid-scale processes, J. Climate, 21, 2384–2400, 2008a.
Sanderson, B. M., Piani, C., Ingram, W. J., Stone, D. A., and Allen, M. R.:
Towards constraining climate sensitivity by linear analysis of feedback
patterns in thousands of perturbed-physics GCM simulations, Clim. Dynam., 30,
175–190, 2008b.
Sanderson, B. M., Shell, K. M., and Ingram, W.: Climate feedbacks determined
using radiative kernels in a multi-thousand member ensemble of AOGCMs, Clim.
Dynam., 35, 1219–1236, 2010.
Schaller, N., Kay, A. L., Lamb, R., Massey, N. R., van Oldenborgh, G. J.,
Otto, F. E. L., Sparrow, S. N., Vautard, R., Yiou, P., Ashpole, I., Bowery,
A., Crooks, S. M., Haustein, K., Huntingford, C., Ingram, W. J., Jones, R.
G., Legg, T., Miller, J., Skeggs, J., Wallom, D., Weisheimer, A., Wilson, S.,
Stott, P. A., and Allen, M. R.: Human Influence on Climate in the 2014
Southern England Winter Floods and Their Impacts, Nat. Clim. Change, 6,
627–634, 2016.
Schirber, S., Klocke, D., Pincus, R., Quaas, J., and Anderson, J. L.:
Parameter estimation using data assimilation in an atmospheric general
circulation model: From a perfect toward the real world, J. Adv. Model. Earth
Syst., 5, 58–70, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012MS000167, 2013.
Schneider, U., Becker, A., Finger, P., Meyer-Christoffer, A., Rudolf, B., and
Ziese, M.: GPCC Full Data Reanalysis Version 6.0 at 0.5∘: Monthly
Land-Surface Precipitation from Rain-Gauges built on GTS-based and Historic
Data, https://doi.org/10.5676/DWD_GPCC/FD_M_V6_050, 2011.
Seager, R., Neelin, D., Simpson, I., Liu, H., Henderson, N., Shaw, T.,
Kushnir, Y., Ting, M., and Cook, B.: Dynamical and thermodynamical causes of
large-scale changes in the hydrological cycle over North America in response
to global warming, J. Climate, 27, 7921–7948, 2014.
Seneviratne, S. I., Lüthi, D., Litschi, M., and Schär, C.:
Land–atmosphere coupling and climate change in Europe, Nature, 443, 205–209,
2006.
Sexton, D. M. and Murphy, J. M.: Multivariate probabilistic projections using
imperfect climate models. Part II: robustness of methodological choices and
consequences for climate sensitivity, Clim. Dynam., 38, 2543–2558, 2012.
Sexton, D. M., Murphy, J. M., Collins, M., and Webb, M. J.: Multivariate
probabilistic projections using imperfect climate models part I: outline of
methodology, Clim. Dynam., 38, 2513–2542, 2012.
Sexton, D. M. H., Karmalkar, A. V., Murphy, J. M., Williams, K. D., Boutle,
I. A., Morcrette, C. J., Stirling, A. J., and Vosper, S. B.: Finding
plausible and diverse variants of a climate model. Part 1: establishing the
relationship between errors at weather and climate time scales, Clim. Dynam., 53,
1–34, 2019.
Shiogama, H., Watanabe, M., Yoshimori, M., Yokohata, T., Ogura, T., Annan, J. D., Hargreaves, J. C., Abe, M., Kamae, Y., O'ishi, R., and Nobui, R.: Perturbed physics ensemble using the MIROC5 coupled atmosphere–ocean GCM without flux corrections: experimental design and results, Clim. Dynam., 39, 3041–3056, 2012.
Sippel, S., Otto, F. E. L., Forkel, M., Allen, M. R., Guillod, B. P.,
Heimann, M., Reichstein, M., Seneviratne, S. I., Thonicke, K., and Mahecha,
M. D.: A novel bias correction methodology for climate impact simulations,
Earth Syst. Dynam., 7, 71–88, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-7-71-2016, 2016.
Solomon, S., Qin, D., Manning, M., Chen, Z., Marquis, M., Averyt, K. B.,
Tignor, M., and Miller, H. L.: Climate change 2007: The physical science
basis, in: Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of
the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2007 Cambridge University
Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, 2007.
Sparrow, S., Wallom, D., Mulholland, D. P., and Haines, K.: Climate model
forecast biases assessed with a perturbed physics ensemble, Clim. Dynam., 49, 1729–1746,
2016.
Stainforth, D. A., Aina, T., Christensen, C., Collins, M., Faull, N., Frame,
D. J., Kettleborough, J. A., Knight, S., Martin, A., Murphy, J., Piani, C.,
Sexton, D., Smith, L. A., Spicer, R. A., Thorpe, A. J., and Allen, M. R.:
Uncertainty in predictions of the climate response to rising levels of
greenhouse gases, Nature, 433, 403–406, 2005.
Stephens, G. L.: Cloud feedbacks in the climate system: A critical review, J.
Climate, 18, 237–273, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-3243.1, 2005.
Stephens, G. L., Li, J., Wild, M., Clayson, C. A., Loeb, N., Kato, S.,
L'ecuyer, T., Stackhouse Jr., P. W., Lebsock, M., and Andrews, T.: An update
on Earth's energy balance in light of the latest global observations, Nat.
Geosci., 5, 691–696, 2012.
Stott, P. A., Stone, D. A., and Allen, M. R.: Human contribution to the
European heatwave of 2003, Nature, 432, 610–614, 2004.
Tett, S. F., Mitchell, J. F., Parker, D. E., and Allen, M. R.: Human
influence on the atmospheric vertical temperature structure: Detection and
observations, Science, 274, 1170–1173, 1996.
Tett, S. F. B., Yamazaki, K., Mineter, M. J., Cartis, C., and Eizenberg, N.:
Calibrating climate models using inverse methods: case studies with HadAM3,
HadAM3P and HadCM3, Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 3567–3589,
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3567-2017, 2017.
Uhe, P., Philip, S., Kew, S., Shah, K., Kimutai, J., Mwangi, E., van
Oldenborgh, G. J., Singh, R., Arrighi, J., Jjemba, E., Cullen, H., and Otto,
F. E. L.: Attributing Drivers of the 2016 Kenyan Drought, Int. J. Climatol.,
38, e554–e568, 2018.
van Oldenborgh, G. J., Otto, F. E. L., Haustein, K., and AchutaRao, K.: The
Heavy Precipitation Rvent of December 2015 in Chennai, India, In Explaining
Extremes of 2015 from a Climate Perspective, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 97,
S87–S91, 2016.
van Oldenborgh, G. J., van der Wiel, K., Sebastian, A., Singh, R., Arrighi,
J., Otto, F. E. L., Haustein, K., Li, S., Vecchi, G., and Cullen, H.:
Attribution of Extreme Rainfall from Hurricane Harvey, August 2017, Environ.
Res. Lett., 12, 124009, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaa343, 2017.
Van Weverberg, K., Morcrette, C. J., Petch, J., Klein, S. A., Ma, H. Y.,
Zhang, C., Xie, S., Tang, Q., Gustafson Jr., W. I., Qian, Y., and Berg, L.
K.: CAUSES: Attribution of surface radiation biases in NWP and climate models
near the U.S. Southern Great Plains, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123,
3612–3644, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027188, 2018.
Williams, J. H. T., Smith, R. S., Valdes, P. J., Booth, B. B. B., and Osprey,
A.: Optimising the FAMOUS climate model: inclusion of global carbon cycling,
Geosci. Model Dev., 6, 141–160, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-141-2013,
2013.
Williamson, D., Goldstein, M., Allison, L., Blaker, A., Challenor, P.,
Jackson, L., and Yamazaki, K.: History matching for exploring and reducing
climate model parameter space using observations and a large perturbed
physics ensemble, Clim. Dynam., 41, 1703–1729, 2013.
Williamson, D., Blaker, A. T., Hampton, C., and Salter, J.: Identifying and
removing structural biases in climate models with history matching, Clim.
Dynam., 45, 1299–1324, 2015.
Williamson, D. B., Blaker, A. T., and Sinha, B.: Tuning without over-tuning:
parametric uncertainty quantification for the NEMO ocean model, Geosci. Model
Dev., 10, 1789–1816, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-1789-2017, 2017.
Wu, X.: Effects of ice mircrophysics on tropical radiative-convective-oceanic
quasi-equilibrium states, J. Atmos. Sci., 59, 1885–1897, 2002.
Xie, P. and Arkin, P. A.: Global precipitation: a 17-year monthly analysis
based on gauge observations, satellite estimates, and numerical model
outputs, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 78, 2539–2558, 1996.
Yamazaki, K., Rowlands, D. J., Aina, T., Blaker, A., Bowery, A., Massey, N.,
Miller, J., Rye, C., Tett, S. F. B., Williamson, D., Yamazaki, Y. H., and
Allen, M. R.: Obtaining diverse behaviors in a climate model without the use
of flux adjustments, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 2781–2793,
https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50304, 2013.
Zhang, C., Xie, S., Klein, S. A., Ma, H.Y ., Tang, S., Van Weverberg, K.,
Morcrette, C. J., and Petch, J.: CAUSES: Diagnosis of the summertime warm
bias in CMIP5 climate models at the ARM Southern Great Plains site, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123, 2968–2992, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027200, 2018.
Zhang, T., Li, L., Lin, Y., Xue, W., Xie, F., Xu, H., and Huang, X.: An
automatic and effective parameter optimization method for model tuning,
Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 3579–3591, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-3579-2015,
2015.
Search articles
Short summary
Understanding the unfolding challenges of climate change relies on climate models, many of which have regional biases larger than the expected climate signal over the next half-century. This work shows the potential for improving climate model simulations through a multiphased parameter refinement approach. Regional warm biases are substantially reduced, suggesting this iterative approach is one path to improving climate models and simulations of present and future climate.
Understanding the unfolding challenges of climate change relies on climate models, many of which...
Geoscientific Model Development
An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.