- Articles & preprints
- Submission
- Policies
- Peer-review process
- Editorial board
- About
- EGU publications
- Manuscript tracking
Journal cover
Journal topic
Geoscientific Model Development
An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic
- Articles & preprints
- Submission
- Policies
- Peer-review process
- Editorial board
- About
- EGU publications
- Manuscript tracking
Journal metrics
IF5.240
IF 5-year
5.768
5.768
CiteScore
8.9
8.9
SNIP1.713
IPP5.53
SJR3.18
Scimago H
index71
index71
h5-index51
Abstracted/indexed
Abstracted/indexed
GMD | Articles | Volume 12, issue 7
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 3017–3043, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3017-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3017-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 3017–3043, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3017-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3017-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Development and technical paper 17 Jul 2019
Development and technical paper | 17 Jul 2019
Reducing climate model biases by exploring parameter space with large ensembles of climate model simulations and statistical emulation
Sihan Li et al.
Related authors
Geert Jan van Oldenborgh, Folmer Krikken, Sophie Lewis, Nicholas J. Leach, Flavio Lehner, Kate R. Saunders, Michiel van Weele, Karsten Haustein, Sihan Li, David Wallom, Sarah Sparrow, Julie Arrighi, Roop P. Singh, Maarten K. van Aalst, Sjoukje Y. Philip, Robert Vautard, and Friederike E. L. Otto
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2020-69, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2020-69, 2020
Preprint under review for NHESS
Short summary
Short summary
Southeastern Australia suffered from disastrous bushfires during the 2019/20 fire season, raising the question whether these have become more likely due to climate change. We found no attributable trend in extreme annual or monthly low precipitation, but a clear shift towards more extreme heat. However, this shift is underestimated by the models. Analysing fire weather directly, we found that the chance has increased by at least 30 %, but due to the underestimation it could be much higher.
Ruksana H. Rimi, Karsten Haustein, Emily J. Barbour, Sarah N. Sparrow, Sihan Li, David C. H. Wallom, and Myles R. Allen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2018-400, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2018-400, 2018
Revised manuscript has not been submitted
Short summary
Short summary
Extreme rainfall events are major concerns in Bangladesh because such events can cause flash floods and damage nearly harvestable crops in pre-monsoon season; whereas, in monsoon season, the impacts can range from widespread agricultural loss, huge property damage to loss of lives and livelihoods. This paper reveals the role of anthropogenic climate change drivers in changing the risks of extreme rainfall events during pre-monsoon and monsoon seasons at local sub-regional scale within Bangladesh.
Sarah Sparrow, Andrew Bowery, Glenn D. Carver, Marcus O. Köhler, Pirkka Ollinaho, Florian Pappenberger, David Wallom, and Antje Weisheimer
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2020-217, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2020-217, 2020
Preprint under review for GMD
Short summary
Short summary
This paper describes how the research version of the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts' Integrated Forecast System is combined with climateprediction.net's public volunteer computing resource to develop OpenIFS@home. Thousands of volunteer personal computers simulated slightly different realisations of the tropical storm Karl to demonstrate the performance of the large ensemble forecast. OpenIFS@Home offers researchers a new tool to study weather forecasts and related questions.
Doug McNeall, Jonny Williams, Richard Betts, Ben Booth, Peter Challenor, Peter Good, and Andy Wiltshire
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 2487–2509, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2487-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2487-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
In the climate model FAMOUS, matching the modelled Amazon rainforest to observations required different land surface parameter settings than for other forests. It was unclear if this discrepancy was due to a bias in the modelled climate or an error in the land surface component of the model. Correcting the climate of the model with a statistical model corrects the simulation of the Amazon forest, suggesting that the land surface component of the model is not the source of the discrepancy.
Elizabeth R. Jachens, David E. Rupp, Clément Roques, and John S. Selker
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 1159–1170, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-1159-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-1159-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Recession analysis uses the receding streamflow following precipitation events to estimate watershed-average properties. Two methods for recession analysis use recession events individually or all events collectively. Using synthetic case studies, this paper shows that analyzing recessions collectively produces flawed interpretations. Moving forward, recession analysis using individual recessions should be used to describe the average and variability of watershed behavior.
Geert Jan van Oldenborgh, Folmer Krikken, Sophie Lewis, Nicholas J. Leach, Flavio Lehner, Kate R. Saunders, Michiel van Weele, Karsten Haustein, Sihan Li, David Wallom, Sarah Sparrow, Julie Arrighi, Roop P. Singh, Maarten K. van Aalst, Sjoukje Y. Philip, Robert Vautard, and Friederike E. L. Otto
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2020-69, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2020-69, 2020
Preprint under review for NHESS
Short summary
Short summary
Southeastern Australia suffered from disastrous bushfires during the 2019/20 fire season, raising the question whether these have become more likely due to climate change. We found no attributable trend in extreme annual or monthly low precipitation, but a clear shift towards more extreme heat. However, this shift is underestimated by the models. Analysing fire weather directly, we found that the chance has increased by at least 30 %, but due to the underestimation it could be much higher.
Laura E. Queen, Philip W. Mote, David E. Rupp, Oriana Chegwidden, and Bart Nijssen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2019-474, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2019-474, 2019
Preprint under review for HESS
Short summary
Short summary
Using a large ensemble of simulated flows throughout the Northwest, we compare daily flood statistics in the past (1950–99) and future (2050–99) periods and find that nearly all locations will experience an increase in flood magnitudes. The flood season expands significantly in many currently snow-dominant rivers, moving from exclusively spring to both winter and spring. These results, properly extended, may help inform flood risk management and the negotiations of the Columbia River Treaty.
Sjoukje Philip, Sarah Sparrow, Sarah F. Kew, Karin van der Wiel, Niko Wanders, Roop Singh, Ahmadul Hassan, Khaled Mohammed, Hammad Javid, Karsten Haustein, Friederike E. L. Otto, Feyera Hirpa, Ruksana H. Rimi, A. K. M. Saiful Islam, David C. H. Wallom, and Geert Jan van Oldenborgh
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 1409–1429, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-1409-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-1409-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
In August 2017 Bangladesh faced one of its worst river flooding events in recent history. For the large Brahmaputra basin, using precipitation alone as a proxy for flooding might not be appropriate. In this paper we explicitly test this assumption by performing an attribution of both precipitation and discharge as a flooding-related measure to climate change. We find the change in risk to be of similar order of magnitude (between 1 and 2) for both the meteorological and hydrological approach.
Chantelle Burton, Richard Betts, Manoel Cardoso, Ted R. Feldpausch, Anna Harper, Chris D. Jones, Douglas I. Kelley, Eddy Robertson, and Andy Wiltshire
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 179–193, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-179-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-179-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Fire and land-use change are important disturbances within the Earth system, and their inclusion in models is critical to enable the correct simulation of vegetation cover. Here we describe developments to the land surface model JULES to represent explicit land-use change and fire and to assess the effects of each process on present day vegetation compared to observations. Using historical land-use data and the fire model INFERNO, overall model results are improved by the developments.
Ruksana H. Rimi, Karsten Haustein, Emily J. Barbour, Sarah N. Sparrow, Sihan Li, David C. H. Wallom, and Myles R. Allen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2018-400, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2018-400, 2018
Revised manuscript has not been submitted
Short summary
Short summary
Extreme rainfall events are major concerns in Bangladesh because such events can cause flash floods and damage nearly harvestable crops in pre-monsoon season; whereas, in monsoon season, the impacts can range from widespread agricultural loss, huge property damage to loss of lives and livelihoods. This paper reveals the role of anthropogenic climate change drivers in changing the risks of extreme rainfall events during pre-monsoon and monsoon seasons at local sub-regional scale within Bangladesh.
Camille Li, Clio Michel, Lise Seland Graff, Ingo Bethke, Giuseppe Zappa, Thomas J. Bracegirdle, Erich Fischer, Ben J. Harvey, Trond Iversen, Martin P. King, Harinarayan Krishnan, Ludwig Lierhammer, Daniel Mitchell, John Scinocca, Hideo Shiogama, Dáithí A. Stone, and Justin J. Wettstein
Earth Syst. Dynam., 9, 359–382, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-9-359-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-9-359-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
This study investigates the midlatitude atmospheric circulation response to 1.5°C and 2.0°C of warming using modelling experiments run for the HAPPI project (Half a degree Additional warming, Prognosis & Projected Impacts). While the chaotic nature of the atmospheric flow dominates in these low-end warming scenarios, some local changes emerge. Case studies explore precipitation impacts both for regions that dry (Mediterranean) and regions that get wetter (Europe, North American west coast).
Stephan Harrison, Jeffrey S. Kargel, Christian Huggel, John Reynolds, Dan H. Shugar, Richard A. Betts, Adam Emmer, Neil Glasser, Umesh K. Haritashya, Jan Klimeš, Liam Reinhardt, Yvonne Schaub, Andy Wiltshire, Dhananjay Regmi, and Vít Vilímek
The Cryosphere, 12, 1195–1209, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-1195-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-1195-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
Most mountain glaciers have receded throughout the last century in response to global climate change. This recession produces a range of natural hazards including glacial lake outburst floods (GLOFs). We have produced the first global inventory of GLOFs associated with the failure of moraine dams and show, counterintuitively, that these have reduced in frequency over recent decades. In this paper we explore the reasons for this pattern.
Corinne Le Quéré, Robbie M. Andrew, Pierre Friedlingstein, Stephen Sitch, Julia Pongratz, Andrew C. Manning, Jan Ivar Korsbakken, Glen P. Peters, Josep G. Canadell, Robert B. Jackson, Thomas A. Boden, Pieter P. Tans, Oliver D. Andrews, Vivek K. Arora, Dorothee C. E. Bakker, Leticia Barbero, Meike Becker, Richard A. Betts, Laurent Bopp, Frédéric Chevallier, Louise P. Chini, Philippe Ciais, Catherine E. Cosca, Jessica Cross, Kim Currie, Thomas Gasser, Ian Harris, Judith Hauck, Vanessa Haverd, Richard A. Houghton, Christopher W. Hunt, George Hurtt, Tatiana Ilyina, Atul K. Jain, Etsushi Kato, Markus Kautz, Ralph F. Keeling, Kees Klein Goldewijk, Arne Körtzinger, Peter Landschützer, Nathalie Lefèvre, Andrew Lenton, Sebastian Lienert, Ivan Lima, Danica Lombardozzi, Nicolas Metzl, Frank Millero, Pedro M. S. Monteiro, David R. Munro, Julia E. M. S. Nabel, Shin-ichiro Nakaoka, Yukihiro Nojiri, X. Antonio Padin, Anna Peregon, Benjamin Pfeil, Denis Pierrot, Benjamin Poulter, Gregor Rehder, Janet Reimer, Christian Rödenbeck, Jörg Schwinger, Roland Séférian, Ingunn Skjelvan, Benjamin D. Stocker, Hanqin Tian, Bronte Tilbrook, Francesco N. Tubiello, Ingrid T. van der Laan-Luijkx, Guido R. van der Werf, Steven van Heuven, Nicolas Viovy, Nicolas Vuichard, Anthony P. Walker, Andrew J. Watson, Andrew J. Wiltshire, Sönke Zaehle, and Dan Zhu
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 10, 405–448, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-405-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-405-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
The Global Carbon Budget 2017 describes data sets and methodology to quantify the five major components of the global carbon budget and their uncertainties. It is the 12th annual update and the 6th published in this journal.
Benoit P. Guillod, Richard G. Jones, Simon J. Dadson, Gemma Coxon, Gianbattista Bussi, James Freer, Alison L. Kay, Neil R. Massey, Sarah N. Sparrow, David C. H. Wallom, Myles R. Allen, and Jim W. Hall
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 611–634, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-611-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-611-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
Assessing the potential impacts of extreme events such as drought and flood requires large datasets of such events, especially when looking at the most severe and rare events. Using a state-of-the-art climate modelling infrastructure that is simulating large numbers of weather time series on volunteers' computers, we generate such a large dataset for the United Kingdom. The dataset covers the recent past (1900–2006) as well as two future time periods (2030s and 2080s).
Katja Frieler, Stefan Lange, Franziska Piontek, Christopher P. O. Reyer, Jacob Schewe, Lila Warszawski, Fang Zhao, Louise Chini, Sebastien Denvil, Kerry Emanuel, Tobias Geiger, Kate Halladay, George Hurtt, Matthias Mengel, Daisuke Murakami, Sebastian Ostberg, Alexander Popp, Riccardo Riva, Miodrag Stevanovic, Tatsuo Suzuki, Jan Volkholz, Eleanor Burke, Philippe Ciais, Kristie Ebi, Tyler D. Eddy, Joshua Elliott, Eric Galbraith, Simon N. Gosling, Fred Hattermann, Thomas Hickler, Jochen Hinkel, Christian Hof, Veronika Huber, Jonas Jägermeyr, Valentina Krysanova, Rafael Marcé, Hannes Müller Schmied, Ioanna Mouratiadou, Don Pierson, Derek P. Tittensor, Robert Vautard, Michelle van Vliet, Matthias F. Biber, Richard A. Betts, Benjamin Leon Bodirsky, Delphine Deryng, Steve Frolking, Chris D. Jones, Heike K. Lotze, Hermann Lotze-Campen, Ritvik Sahajpal, Kirsten Thonicke, Hanqin Tian, and Yoshiki Yamagata
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 4321–4345, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4321-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4321-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
This paper describes the simulation scenario design for the next phase of the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project (ISIMIP), which is designed to facilitate a contribution to the scientific basis for the IPCC Special Report on the impacts of 1.5 °C global warming. ISIMIP brings together over 80 climate-impact models, covering impacts on hydrology, biomes, forests, heat-related mortality, permafrost, tropical cyclones, fisheries, agiculture, energy, and coastal infrastructure.
Benoit P. Guillod, Richard G. Jones, Andy Bowery, Karsten Haustein, Neil R. Massey, Daniel M. Mitchell, Friederike E. L. Otto, Sarah N. Sparrow, Peter Uhe, David C. H. Wallom, Simon Wilson, and Myles R. Allen
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 1849–1872, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-1849-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-1849-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
The weather@home climate modelling system uses the computing power of volunteers around the world to generate a very large number of climate model simulations. This is particularly useful when investigating extreme weather events, notably for the attribution of these events to anthropogenic climate change. A new version of weather@home is presented and evaluated, which includes an improved representation of the land surface and increased horizontal resolution over Europe.
Diego Montes, Juan A. Añel, Tomás F. Pena, Peter Uhe, and David C. H. Wallom
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 811–826, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-811-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-811-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
This paper discusses the how the combination of cloud and volunteer computing can be a feasible solution to address large, complex, and expensive computing problems such as climate modelling.
Daniel Mitchell, Krishna AchutaRao, Myles Allen, Ingo Bethke, Urs Beyerle, Andrew Ciavarella, Piers M. Forster, Jan Fuglestvedt, Nathan Gillett, Karsten Haustein, William Ingram, Trond Iversen, Viatcheslav Kharin, Nicholas Klingaman, Neil Massey, Erich Fischer, Carl-Friedrich Schleussner, John Scinocca, Øyvind Seland, Hideo Shiogama, Emily Shuckburgh, Sarah Sparrow, Dáithí Stone, Peter Uhe, David Wallom, Michael Wehner, and Rashyd Zaaboul
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 571–583, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-571-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-571-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
This paper provides an experimental design to assess impacts of a world that is 1.5 °C warmer than at pre-industrial levels. The design is a new way to approach impacts from the climate community, and aims to answer questions related to the recent Paris Agreement. In particular the paper provides a method for studying extreme events under relatively high mitigation scenarios.
Doug McNeall, Jonny Williams, Ben Booth, Richard Betts, Peter Challenor, Andy Wiltshire, and David Sexton
Earth Syst. Dynam., 7, 917–935, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-7-917-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-7-917-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
We compare simulated with observed forests to constrain uncertain input parameters of the land surface component of a climate model.
We find that the model is unlikely to be able to simulate the Amazon and other major forests simultaneously at any one parameter set, suggesting a bias in the model's representation of the Amazon.
We find we cannot constrain parameters individually, but we can rule out large areas of joint parameter space.
Mitchell T. Black, David J. Karoly, Suzanne M. Rosier, Sam M. Dean, Andrew D. King, Neil R. Massey, Sarah N. Sparrow, Andy Bowery, David Wallom, Richard G. Jones, Friederike E. L. Otto, and Myles R. Allen
Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 3161–3176, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3161-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3161-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
This study presents a citizen science computing project, known as weather@home Australia–New Zealand, which runs climate models on thousands of home computers. By harnessing the power of volunteers' computers, this project is capable of simulating extreme weather events over Australia and New Zealand under different climate scenarios.
B. Poulter, N. MacBean, A. Hartley, I. Khlystova, O. Arino, R. Betts, S. Bontemps, M. Boettcher, C. Brockmann, P. Defourny, S. Hagemann, M. Herold, G. Kirches, C. Lamarche, D. Lederer, C. Ottlé, M. Peters, and P. Peylin
Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 2315–2328, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2315-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2315-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
Land cover is an essential variable in earth system models and determines conditions driving biogeochemical, energy and water exchange between ecosystems and the atmosphere. A methodology is presented for mapping plant functional types used in global vegetation models from a updated land cover classification system and open-source conversion tool, resulting from a consultative process among map producers and modelers engaged in the European Space Agency’s Land Cover Climate Change Initiative.
T. Osborne, J. Gornall, J. Hooker, K. Williams, A. Wiltshire, R. Betts, and T. Wheeler
Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 1139–1155, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-1139-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-1139-2015, 2015
R. A. Betts, N. Golding, P. Gonzalez, J. Gornall, R. Kahana, G. Kay, L. Mitchell, and A. Wiltshire
Biogeosciences, 12, 1317–1338, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-1317-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-1317-2015, 2015
J. C. S. Davie, P. D. Falloon, R. Kahana, R. Dankers, R. Betts, F. T. Portmann, D. Wisser, D. B. Clark, A. Ito, Y. Masaki, K. Nishina, B. Fekete, Z. Tessler, Y. Wada, X. Liu, Q. Tang, S. Hagemann, T. Stacke, R. Pavlick, S. Schaphoff, S. N. Gosling, W. Franssen, and N. Arnell
Earth Syst. Dynam., 4, 359–374, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-4-359-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-4-359-2013, 2013
G. S. Mauger, K. A. Bumbaco, G. J. Hakim, and P. W. Mote
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 2, 199–212, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-2-199-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-2-199-2013, 2013
Related subject area
Climate and Earth System Modeling
The benefits of increasing resolution in global and regional climate simulations for European climate extremes
European daily precipitation according to EURO-CORDEX regional climate models (RCMs) and high-resolution global climate models (GCMs) from the High-Resolution Model Intercomparison Project (HighResMIP)
Harmonization of global land use change and management for the period 850–2100 (LUH2) for CMIP6
A computationally efficient method for probabilistic local warming projections constrained by history matching and pattern scaling, demonstrated by WASP–LGRTC-1.0
R2D2 v2.0: accounting for temporal dependences in multivariate bias correction via analogue rank resampling
Extending the Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy v2.54) model hierarchy: the ECHAM/MESSy IdeaLized (EMIL) model setup
Boreal summer intraseasonal oscillation in a superparameterized general circulation model: effects of air–sea coupling and ocean mean state
Reduced Complexity Model Intercomparison Project Phase 1: introduction and evaluation of global-mean temperature response
Modeling land surface processes over a mountainous rainforest in Costa Rica using CLM4.5 and CLM5
A new bias-correction method for precipitation over complex terrain suitable for different climate states: a case study using WRF (version 3.8.1)
ISSM-SLPS: geodetically compliant Sea-Level Projection System for the Ice-sheet and Sea-level System Model v4.17
Newly developed aircraft routing options for air traffic simulation in the chemistry–climate model EMAC 2.53: AirTraf 2.0
Quantifying CanESM5 and EAMv1 sensitivities to Mt. Pinatubo volcanic forcing for the CMIP6 historical experiment
Optimizing high-resolution Community Earth System Model on a heterogeneous many-core supercomputing platform
MIROC-INTEG-LAND version 1: a global biogeochemical land surface model with human water management, crop growth, and land-use change
Optimality-based non-Redfield plankton–ecosystem model (OPEM v1.1) in UVic-ESCM 2.9 – Part 2: Sensitivity analysis and model calibration
Optimality-based non-Redfield plankton–ecosystem model (OPEM v1.1) in UVic-ESCM 2.9 – Part 1: Implementation and model behaviour
The E3SM version 1 single-column model
RadNet 1.0: exploring deep learning architectures for longwave radiative transfer
Efficient ensemble data assimilation for coupled models with the Parallel Data Assimilation Framework: example of AWI-CM (AWI-CM-PDAF 1.0)
Modelling mineral dust emissions and atmospheric dispersion with MADE3 in EMAC v2.54
Evaluation of the University of Victoria Earth System Climate Model version 2.10 (UVic ESCM 2.10)
Earth System Model Evaluation Tool (ESMValTool) v2.0 – diagnostics for emergent constraints and future projections from Earth system models in CMIP
Evaluating the land-surface energy partitioning in ERA5
Robust Ecosystem Demography (RED version 1.0): a parsimonious approach to modelling vegetation dynamics in Earth system models
The GGCMI Phase 2 emulators: global gridded crop model responses to changes in CO2, temperature, water, and nitrogen (version 1.0)
Role of vegetation in representing land surface temperature in the CHTESSEL (CY45R1) and SURFEX-ISBA (v8.1) land surface models: a case study over Iberia
Taiwan Earth System Model Version 1: description and evaluation of mean state
Evaluating simulated climate patterns from the CMIP archives using satellite and reanalysis datasets using the Climate Model Assessment Tool (CMATv1)
An offline framework for high-dimensional ensemble Kalman filters to reduce the time to solution
The shared socio-economic pathway (SSP) greenhouse gas concentrations and their extensions to 2500
HighResMIP versions of EC-Earth: EC-Earth3P and EC-Earth3P-HR – description, model computational performance and basic validation
Numerical study of the seasonal thermal and gas regimes of the largest artificial reservoir in western Europe using the LAKE 2.0 model
On the increased climate sensitivity in the EC-Earth model from CMIP5 to CMIP6
Earth System Model Evaluation Tool (ESMValTool) v2.0 – an extended set of large-scale diagnostics for quasi-operational and comprehensive evaluation of Earth system models in CMIP
Development of the Community Water Model (CWatM v1.04) – a high-resolution hydrological model for global and regional assessment of integrated water resources management
WRF-GC (v1.0): online coupling of WRF (v3.9.1.1) and GEOS-Chem (v12.2.1) for regional atmospheric chemistry modeling – Part 1: Description of the one-way model
The Sailor diagram – A new diagram for the verification of two-dimensional vector data from multiple models
Global rules for translating land-use change (LUH2) to land-cover change for CMIP6 using GLM2
The interactive global fire module pyrE (v1.0)
IPSL-CM5A2 – an Earth system model designed for multi-millennial climate simulations
Observations for Model Intercomparison Project (Obs4MIPs): status for CMIP6
GTS v1.0: A Macrophysics Scheme for Climate Models Based on a Probability Density Function
Exploring the Parameters Space of the Regional Climate Model COSMO-CLM 5.0 for the CORDEX Central Asia Domain
Spin-up Characteristics with Three Types of Initial Fields and the Restart Effects on the Forecast Accuracy in GRAPES Global Forecast System
Superparameterised cloud effects in the EMAC general circulation model (v2.50) – influences of model configuration
The Flexible Ocean and Climate Infrastructure version 1 (FOCI1): mean state and variability
Investigating the sensitivity to resolving aerosol interactions in downscaling regional model experiments with WRFv3.8.1 over Europe
Correcting a bias in a climate model with an augmented emulator
Improving climate model coupling through a complete mesh representation: a case study with E3SM (v1) and MOAB (v5.x)
Carley E. Iles, Robert Vautard, Jane Strachan, Sylvie Joussaume, Bernd R. Eggen, and Chris D. Hewitt
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 5583–5607, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5583-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5583-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We investigate how increased resolution affects the simulation of European climate extremes for global and regional climate models to inform modelling strategies. Precipitation extremes become heavier with higher resolution, especially over mountains, wind extremes become somewhat stronger, and for temperature extremes warm biases are reduced over mountains. Differences with resolution for the global model appear to come from downscaling effects rather than improved large-scale circulation.
Marie-Estelle Demory, Ségolène Berthou, Jesús Fernández, Silje L. Sørland, Roman Brogli, Malcolm J. Roberts, Urs Beyerle, Jon Seddon, Rein Haarsma, Christoph Schär, Erasmo Buonomo, Ole B. Christensen, James M. Ciarlo ̀, Rowan Fealy, Grigory Nikulin, Daniele Peano, Dian Putrasahan, Christopher D. Roberts, Retish Senan, Christian Steger, Claas Teichmann, and Robert Vautard
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 5485–5506, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5485-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5485-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Now that global climate models (GCMs) can run at similar resolutions to regional climate models (RCMs), one may wonder whether GCMs and RCMs provide similar regional climate information. We perform an evaluation for daily precipitation distribution in PRIMAVERA GCMs (25–50 km resolution) and CORDEX RCMs (12–50 km resolution) over Europe. We show that PRIMAVERA and CORDEX simulate similar distributions. Considering both datasets at such a resolution results in large benefits for impact studies.
George C. Hurtt, Louise Chini, Ritvik Sahajpal, Steve Frolking, Benjamin L. Bodirsky, Katherine Calvin, Jonathan C. Doelman, Justin Fisk, Shinichiro Fujimori, Kees Klein Goldewijk, Tomoko Hasegawa, Peter Havlik, Andreas Heinimann, Florian Humpenöder, Johan Jungclaus, Jed O. Kaplan, Jennifer Kennedy, Tamás Krisztin, David Lawrence, Peter Lawrence, Lei Ma, Ole Mertz, Julia Pongratz, Alexander Popp, Benjamin Poulter, Keywan Riahi, Elena Shevliakova, Elke Stehfest, Peter Thornton, Francesco N. Tubiello, Detlef P. van Vuuren, and Xin Zhang
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 5425–5464, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5425-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5425-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
To estimate the effects of human land use activities on the carbon–climate system, a new set of global gridded land use forcing datasets was developed to link historical land use data to eight future scenarios in a standard format required by climate models. This new generation of land use harmonization (LUH2) includes updated inputs, higher spatial resolution, more detailed land use transitions, and the addition of important agricultural management layers; it will be used for CMIP6 simulations.
Philip Goodwin, Martin Leduc, Antti-Ilari Partanen, H. Damon Matthews, and Alex Rogers
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 5389–5399, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5389-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5389-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Numerical climate models are used to make projections of future surface warming for different pathways of future greenhouse gas emissions, where future surface warming will vary from place to place. However, it is so expensive to run complex models using supercomputers that future projections can only be produced for a small number of possible future emissions pathways. This study presents an efficient climate model to make projections of local surface warming using a desktop computer.
Mathieu Vrac and Soulivanh Thao
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 5367–5387, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5367-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5367-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We propose a multivariate bias correction (MBC) method to adjust the spatial and/or inter-variable properties of climate simulations, while also accounting for their temporal dependences (e.g., autocorrelations).
It consists on a method reordering the ranks of the time series according to their multivariate distance to a reference time series.
Results show that temporal correlations are improved while spatial and inter-variable correlations are still satisfactorily corrected.
Hella Garny, Roland Walz, Matthias Nützel, and Thomas Birner
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 5229–5257, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5229-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5229-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Numerical models of Earth's climate system have been gaining more and more complexity over the last decades. Therefore, it is important to establish simplified models to improve process understanding. In our study, we present and document the development of a new simplified model setup within the framework of a complex climate model system that uses the same routines to calculate atmospheric dynamics as the complex model but is simplified in the representation of clouds and radiation.
Yingxia Gao, Nicholas P. Klingaman, Charlotte A. DeMott, and Pang-Chi Hsu
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 5191–5209, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5191-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5191-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Both the air–sea coupling and ocean mean state affect the fidelity of simulated boreal summer intraseasonal oscillation (BSISO). To elucidate their relative effects on the simulated BSISO, a set of experiments was conducted using a superparameterized AGCM and its coupled version. Both air–sea coupling and cold ocean mean state improve the BSISO amplitude due to the suppression of the overestimated variance, while the former (latter) could further upgrade (degrade) the BSISO propagation.
Zebedee R. J. Nicholls, Malte Meinshausen, Jared Lewis, Robert Gieseke, Dietmar Dommenget, Kalyn Dorheim, Chen-Shuo Fan, Jan S. Fuglestvedt, Thomas Gasser, Ulrich Golüke, Philip Goodwin, Corinne Hartin, Austin P. Hope, Elmar Kriegler, Nicholas J. Leach, Davide Marchegiani, Laura A. McBride, Yann Quilcaille, Joeri Rogelj, Ross J. Salawitch, Bjørn H. Samset, Marit Sandstad, Alexey N. Shiklomanov, Ragnhild B. Skeie, Christopher J. Smith, Steve Smith, Katsumasa Tanaka, Junichi Tsutsui, and Zhiang Xie
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 5175–5190, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5175-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5175-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Computational limits mean that we cannot run our most comprehensive climate models for all applications of interest. In such cases, reduced complexity models (RCMs) are used. Here, researchers working on 15 different models present the first systematic community effort to evaluate and compare RCMs: the Reduced Complexity Model Intercomparison Project (RCMIP). Our research ensures that users of RCMs can more easily evaluate the strengths, weaknesses and limitations of their tools.
Jaeyoung Song, Gretchen R. Miller, Anthony T. Cahill, Luiza Maria T. Aparecido, and Georgianne W. Moore
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 5147–5173, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5147-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5147-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The performance of a land surface model (CLM4.5 and 5.0) was examined against a suite of measurements from a tropical montane rainforest in Costa Rica. Both versions failed to capture the effects of frequent rainfall events and mountainous terrain on temperature, leaf wetness, photosynthesis, and transpiration. While the new model version eliminated some errors, it still cannot precisely simulate a number of processes. This suggests that two key components of the model need modification.
Patricio Velasquez, Martina Messmer, and Christoph C. Raible
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 5007–5027, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5007-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5007-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
This work presents a new bias-correction method for precipitation that considers orographic characteristics, which can be used in studies where the latter strongly changes. The three-step correction method consists of a separation into orographic features, correction of low-intensity precipitation, and application of empirical quantile mapping. Seasonal bias induced by the global climate model is fully corrected. Rigorous cross-validations illustrate the method's applicability and robustness.
Eric Larour, Lambert Caron, Mathieu Morlighem, Surendra Adhikari, Thomas Frederikse, Nicole-Jeanne Schlegel, Erik Ivins, Benjamin Hamlington, Robert Kopp, and Sophie Nowicki
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 4925–4941, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4925-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4925-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
ISSM-SLPS is a new projection system for future sea level that increases the resolution and accuracy of current projection systems and improves the way uncertainty is treated in such projections. This will pave the way for better inclusion of state-of-the-art results from existing intercomparison efforts carried out by the scientific community, such as GlacierMIP2 or ISMIP6, into sea-level projections.
Hiroshi Yamashita, Feijia Yin, Volker Grewe, Patrick Jöckel, Sigrun Matthes, Bastian Kern, Katrin Dahlmann, and Christine Frömming
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 4869–4890, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4869-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4869-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
This paper describes the updated submodel AirTraf 2.0 which simulates global air traffic in the ECHAM/MESSy Atmospheric Chemistry (EMAC) model. Nine aircraft routing options have been integrated, including contrail avoidance, minimum economic costs, and minimum climate impact. Example simulations reveal characteristics of different routing options on air traffic performances. The consistency of the AirTraf simulations is verified with literature data.
Landon A. Rieger, Jason N. S. Cole, John C. Fyfe, Stephen Po-Chedley, Philip J. Cameron-Smith, Paul J. Durack, Nathan P. Gillett, and Qi Tang
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 4831–4843, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4831-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4831-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Recently, the stratospheric aerosol forcing dataset used as an input to the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 6 was updated. This work explores the impact of those changes on the modelled historical climates in the CanESM5 and EAMv1 models. Temperature differences in the stratosphere shortly after the Pinatubo eruption are found to be significant, but surface temperatures and precipitation do not show a significant change.
Shaoqing Zhang, Haohuan Fu, Lixin Wu, Yuxuan Li, Hong Wang, Yunhui Zeng, Xiaohui Duan, Wubing Wan, Li Wang, Yuan Zhuang, Hongsong Meng, Kai Xu, Ping Xu, Lin Gan, Zhao Liu, Sihai Wu, Yuhu Chen, Haining Yu, Shupeng Shi, Lanning Wang, Shiming Xu, Wei Xue, Weiguo Liu, Qiang Guo, Jie Zhang, Guanghui Zhu, Yang Tu, Jim Edwards, Allison Baker, Jianlin Yong, Man Yuan, Yangyang Yu, Qiuying Zhang, Zedong Liu, Mingkui Li, Dongning Jia, Guangwen Yang, Zhiqiang Wei, Jingshan Pan, Ping Chang, Gokhan Danabasoglu, Stephen Yeager, Nan Rosenbloom, and Ying Guo
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 4809–4829, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4809-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4809-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Science advancement and societal needs require Earth system modelling with higher resolutions that demand tremendous computing power. We successfully scale the 10 km ocean and 25 km atmosphere high-resolution Earth system model to a new leading-edge heterogeneous supercomputer using state-of-the-art optimizing methods, promising the solution of high spatial resolution and time-varying frequency. Corresponding technical breakthroughs are of significance in modelling and HPC design communities.
Tokuta Yokohata, Tsuguki Kinoshita, Gen Sakurai, Yadu Pokhrel, Akihiko Ito, Masashi Okada, Yusuke Satoh, Etsushi Kato, Tomoko Nitta, Shinichiro Fujimori, Farshid Felfelani, Yoshimitsu Masaki, Toshichika Iizumi, Motoki Nishimori, Naota Hanasaki, Kiyoshi Takahashi, Yoshiki Yamagata, and Seita Emori
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 4713–4747, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4713-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4713-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The most significant feature of MIROC-INTEG-LAND is that the land surface model that describes the processes of the energy and water balances, human water management, and crop growth incorporates a land-use decision-making model based on economic activities. The future simulations indicate that changes in climate have significant impacts on crop yields, land use, and irrigation water demand.
Chia-Te Chien, Markus Pahlow, Markus Schartau, and Andreas Oschlies
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 4691–4712, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4691-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4691-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We demonstrate sensitivities of tracers to parameters of a new optimality-based plankton–ecosystem model (OPEM) in the UVic-ESCM. We find that changes in phytoplankton subsistence nitrogen quota strongly impact the nitrogen inventory, nitrogen fixation, and elemental stoichiometry of ordinary phytoplankton and diazotrophs. We introduce a new likelihood-based metric for model calibration, and it shows the capability of constraining globally averaged oxygen, nitrate, and DIC concentrations.
Markus Pahlow, Chia-Te Chien, Lionel A. Arteaga, and Andreas Oschlies
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 4663–4690, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4663-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4663-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The stoichiometry of marine biotic processes is important for the regulation of atmospheric CO2 and hence the global climate. We replace a simplistic, fixed-stoichiometry plankton module in an Earth system model with an optimal-regulation model with variable stoichiometry. Our model compares better to the observed carbon transfer from the surface to depth and surface nutrient distributions. This work could aid our ability to describe and project the role of marine ecosystems in the Earth system.
Peter A. Bogenschutz, Shuaiqi Tang, Peter M. Caldwell, Shaocheng Xie, Wuyin Lin, and Yao-Sheng Chen
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 4443–4458, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4443-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4443-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
This paper documents a tool that has been developed that can be used to accelerate the development and understanding of climate models. This version of the model, known as a the single-column model, is much faster to run than the full climate model, and we demonstrate that this tool can be used to quickly exploit model biases that arise due to physical processes. We show examples of how this single-column model can directly benefit the field.
Ying Liu, Rodrigo Caballero, and Joy Merwin Monteiro
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 4399–4412, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4399-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4399-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The calculation of atmospheric radiative transfer is the most computationally expensive part of climate models. Reducing this computational burden could potentially improve our ability to simulate the earth's climate at finer scales. We propose using a statistical model – a deep neural network – to compute approximate radiative transfer in the earth's atmosphere. We demonstrate a significant reduction in computational burden as compared to a traditional scheme, especially when using GPUs.
Lars Nerger, Qi Tang, and Longjiang Mu
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 4305–4321, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4305-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4305-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Data assimilation combines observations with numerical models to get an improved estimate of the model state. This work discusses the technical aspects of how a coupled model that simulates the ocean and the atmosphere can be augmented by data assimilation functionality provided in generic form by the open-source software PDAF (Parallel Data Assimilation Framework). A very efficient program is obtained that can be executed on high-performance computers.
Christof G. Beer, Johannes Hendricks, Mattia Righi, Bernd Heinold, Ina Tegen, Silke Groß, Daniel Sauer, Adrian Walser, and Bernadett Weinzierl
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 4287–4303, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4287-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4287-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Mineral dust aerosol plays an important role in the climate system. Previously, dust emissions have often been represented in global models by prescribed monthly-mean emission fields representative of a specific year. We now apply an online calculation of wind-driven dust emissions. This results in an improved agreement with observations, due to a better representation of the highly variable dust emissions. Increasing the model resolution led to an additional performance gain.
Nadine Mengis, David P. Keller, Andrew H. MacDougall, Michael Eby, Nesha Wright, Katrin J. Meissner, Andreas Oschlies, Andreas Schmittner, Alexander J. MacIsaac, H. Damon Matthews, and Kirsten Zickfeld
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 4183–4204, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4183-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4183-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
In this paper, we evaluate the newest version of the University of Victoria Earth System Climate Model (UVic ESCM 2.10). Combining recent model developments as a joint effort, this version is to be used in the next phase of model intercomparison and climate change studies. The UVic ESCM 2.10 is capable of reproducing changes in historical temperature and carbon fluxes well. Additionally, the model is able to reproduce the three-dimensional distribution of many ocean tracers.
Axel Lauer, Veronika Eyring, Omar Bellprat, Lisa Bock, Bettina K. Gier, Alasdair Hunter, Ruth Lorenz, Núria Pérez-Zanón, Mattia Righi, Manuel Schlund, Daniel Senftleben, Katja Weigel, and Sabrina Zechlau
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 4205–4228, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4205-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4205-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The Earth System Model Evaluation Tool is a community software tool designed for evaluation and analysis of climate models. New features of version 2.0 include analysis scripts for important large-scale features in climate models, diagnostics for extreme events, regional model and impact evaluation. In this paper, newly implemented climate metrics, emergent constraints for climate-relevant feedbacks and diagnostics for future model projections are described and illustrated with examples.
Brecht Martens, Dominik L. Schumacher, Hendrik Wouters, Joaquín Muñoz-Sabater, Niko E. C. Verhoest, and Diego G. Miralles
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 4159–4181, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4159-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4159-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Climate reanalyses are widely used in different fields and an in-depth evaluation of the different variables provided by reanalyses is a necessary means to provide feedback on the quality to their users and the operational centres producing these data sets. In this study, we show the improvements of ECMWF's latest climate reanalysis (ERA5) upon its predecessor (ERA-Interim) in partitioning the available energy at the land surface.
Arthur P. K. Argles, Jonathan R. Moore, Chris Huntingford, Andrew J. Wiltshire, Anna B. Harper, Chris D. Jones, and Peter M. Cox
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 4067–4089, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4067-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4067-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The Robust Ecosystem Demography (RED) model simulates cohorts of vegetation through mass classes. RED establishes a framework for representing demographic changes through competition, growth, and mortality across the size distribution of a forest. The steady state of the model can be solved analytically, enabling initialization. When driven by mean growth rates from a land-surface model, RED is able to fit the observed global vegetation map, giving a map of implicit mortality rates.
James A. Franke, Christoph Müller, Joshua Elliott, Alex C. Ruane, Jonas Jägermeyr, Abigail Snyder, Marie Dury, Pete D. Falloon, Christian Folberth, Louis François, Tobias Hank, R. Cesar Izaurralde, Ingrid Jacquemin, Curtis Jones, Michelle Li, Wenfeng Liu, Stefan Olin, Meridel Phillips, Thomas A. M. Pugh, Ashwan Reddy, Karina Williams, Ziwei Wang, Florian Zabel, and Elisabeth J. Moyer
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 3995–4018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3995-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3995-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Improving our understanding of the impacts of climate change on crop yields will be critical for global food security in the next century. The models often used to study the how climate change may impact agriculture are complex and costly to run. In this work, we describe a set of global crop model emulators (simplified models) developed under the Agricultural Model Intercomparison Project. Crop model emulators make agricultural simulations more accessible to policy or decision makers.
Miguel Nogueira, Clément Albergel, Souhail Boussetta, Frederico Johannsen, Isabel F. Trigo, Sofia L. Ermida, João P. A. Martins, and Emanuel Dutra
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 3975–3993, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3975-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3975-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We used earth observations to evaluate and improve the representation of land surface temperature (LST) and vegetation coverage over Iberia in CHTESSEL and SURFEX land surface models. We demonstrate the added value of updating the vegetation types and fractions together with the representation of vegetation coverage seasonality. Results show a large reduction in daily maximum LST systematic error during warm months, with neutral impacts in other seasons.
Wei-Liang Lee, Yi-Chi Wang, Chein-Jung Shiu, I-chun Tsai, Chia-Ying Tu, Yung-Yao Lan, Jen-Ping Chen, Hua-Lu Pan, and Huang-Hsiung Hsu
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 3887–3904, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3887-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3887-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The Taiwan Earth System Model (TaiESM) is a new climate model developed in Taiwan. It includes several new features, and therefore it can better simulate the occurrence of convective rainfall, solar energy received by mountainous surfaces, and more detail chemical processes in aerosols. TaiESM can capture the trend of global warming after 1950 well, and its overall performance in most meteorological quantities is better than the average of global models used in IPCC AR5.
John T. Fasullo
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 3627–3642, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3627-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3627-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The fidelity of climate model simulations included in the WCRP Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Versions 3 through 6 is evaluated using best estimates of fields considered by the community to be critical for climate change projections. The analysis benchmarks patterns of the mean state and variability (seasonal/interannual) both within and across model generations, highlighting progress and quantifying persisting biases across models.
Yongjun Zheng, Clément Albergel, Simon Munier, Bertrand Bonan, and Jean-Christophe Calvet
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 3607–3625, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3607-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3607-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
This study proposes a sophisticated dynamically running job scheme as well as an innovative parallel IO algorithm to reduce the time to solution of an offline framework for high-dimensional ensemble Kalman filters. The offline and online modes of ensemble Kalman filters are built to comprehensively assess their time to solution efficiencies. The offline mode is substantially faster than the online mode in terms of time to solution, especially for large-scale assimilation problems.
Malte Meinshausen, Zebedee R. J. Nicholls, Jared Lewis, Matthew J. Gidden, Elisabeth Vogel, Mandy Freund, Urs Beyerle, Claudia Gessner, Alexander Nauels, Nico Bauer, Josep G. Canadell, John S. Daniel, Andrew John, Paul B. Krummel, Gunnar Luderer, Nicolai Meinshausen, Stephen A. Montzka, Peter J. Rayner, Stefan Reimann, Steven J. Smith, Marten van den Berg, Guus J. M. Velders, Martin K. Vollmer, and Ray H. J. Wang
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 3571–3605, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3571-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3571-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
This study provides the future greenhouse gas (GHG) concentrations under the new set of so-called SSP scenarios (the successors of the IPCC SRES and previous representative concentration pathway (RCP) scenarios). The projected CO2 concentrations range from 350 ppm for low-emission scenarios by 2150 to more than 2000 ppm under the high-emission scenarios. We also provide concentrations, latitudinal gradients, and seasonality for most of the other 42 considered GHGs.
Rein Haarsma, Mario Acosta, Rena Bakhshi, Pierre-Antoine Bretonnière, Louis-Philippe Caron, Miguel Castrillo, Susanna Corti, Paolo Davini, Eleftheria Exarchou, Federico Fabiano, Uwe Fladrich, Ramon Fuentes Franco, Javier García-Serrano, Jost von Hardenberg, Torben Koenigk, Xavier Levine, Virna Loana Meccia, Twan van Noije, Gijs van den Oord, Froila M. Palmeiro, Mario Rodrigo, Yohan Ruprich-Robert, Philippe Le Sager, Etienne Tourigny, Shiyu Wang, Michiel van Weele, and Klaus Wyser
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 3507–3527, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3507-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3507-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
HighResMIP is an international coordinated CMIP6 effort to investigate the improvement in climate modeling caused by an increase in horizontal resolution. This paper describes EC-Earth3P-(HR), which has been developed for HighResMIP. First analyses reveal that increasing resolution does improve certain aspects of the simulated climate but that many other biases still continue, possibly related to phenomena that are still not yet resolved and need to be parameterized.
Maksim Iakunin, Victor Stepanenko, Rui Salgado, Miguel Potes, Alexandra Penha, Maria Helena Novais, and Gonçalo Rodrigues
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 3475–3488, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3475-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3475-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The Alqueva reservoir, located in the southeast of Portugal, is the largest artificial reservoir in western Europe. It was established in 2002 to provide water and electrical resources to meet regional needs. Complex research of this reservoir is an essential scientific task in the scope of meteorology, hydrology, biology, and ecology. Two numerical models (namely, LAKE 2.0 and FLake) were used to assess the thermodynamic and biogeochemical regimes of the reservoir over 2 years of observations.
Klaus Wyser, Twan van Noije, Shuting Yang, Jost von Hardenberg, Declan O'Donnell, and Ralf Döscher
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 3465–3474, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3465-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3465-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The EC-Earth model used for CMIP6 is found to have a higher equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS) than its predecessor used for CMIP5. In a series of sensitivity experiments, we investigate which model updates since CMIP5 have contributed to the increase in ECS. The main reason for the higher sensitivity in the EC-Earth model is the improved representation of the aerosol–radiation and aerosol–cloud interactions.
Veronika Eyring, Lisa Bock, Axel Lauer, Mattia Righi, Manuel Schlund, Bouwe Andela, Enrico Arnone, Omar Bellprat, Björn Brötz, Louis-Philippe Caron, Nuno Carvalhais, Irene Cionni, Nicola Cortesi, Bas Crezee, Edouard L. Davin, Paolo Davini, Kevin Debeire, Lee de Mora, Clara Deser, David Docquier, Paul Earnshaw, Carsten Ehbrecht, Bettina K. Gier, Nube Gonzalez-Reviriego, Paul Goodman, Stefan Hagemann, Steven Hardiman, Birgit Hassler, Alasdair Hunter, Christopher Kadow, Stephan Kindermann, Sujan Koirala, Nikolay Koldunov, Quentin Lejeune, Valerio Lembo, Tomas Lovato, Valerio Lucarini, François Massonnet, Benjamin Müller, Amarjiit Pandde, Núria Pérez-Zanón, Adam Phillips, Valeriu Predoi, Joellen Russell, Alistair Sellar, Federico Serva, Tobias Stacke, Ranjini Swaminathan, Verónica Torralba, Javier Vegas-Regidor, Jost von Hardenberg, Katja Weigel, and Klaus Zimmermann
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 3383–3438, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3383-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3383-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The Earth System Model Evaluation Tool (ESMValTool) is a community diagnostics and performance metrics tool designed to improve comprehensive and routine evaluation of earth system models (ESMs) participating in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP). It has undergone rapid development since the first release in 2016 and is now a well-tested tool that provides end-to-end provenance tracking to ensure reproducibility.
Peter Burek, Yusuke Satoh, Taher Kahil, Ting Tang, Peter Greve, Mikhail Smilovic, Luca Guillaumot, Fang Zhao, and Yoshihide Wada
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 3267–3298, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3267-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3267-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We present the new global hydrological model "Community Water Model" (CWatM), which can be used globally and regionally. The model is open source and written with the Python programming language. It uses global, freely available data in a smart and state-of-the-art format. It includes the major hydrological processes but also takes into account human activities, such as water use and reservoir regulation, by calculating water demand from the agriculture, domestic, and industrial sectors.
Haipeng Lin, Xu Feng, Tzung-May Fu, Heng Tian, Yaping Ma, Lijuan Zhang, Daniel J. Jacob, Robert M. Yantosca, Melissa P. Sulprizio, Elizabeth W. Lundgren, Jiawei Zhuang, Qiang Zhang, Xiao Lu, Lin Zhang, Lu Shen, Jianping Guo, Sebastian D. Eastham, and Christoph A. Keller
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 3241–3265, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3241-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3241-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Online coupling of meteorology and chemistry models often presents maintenance issues with hard-wired coding. We present WRF-GC, an one-way online coupling of the WRF meteorological model and GEOS-Chem atmospheric chemistry model for regional atmospheric chemistry and air quality modeling. Our coupling structure allows future versions of either parent model to be immediately integrated into WRF-GC. The WRF-GC model was able to well reproduce regional PM2.5 with greater computational efficiency.
Jon Sáenz, Sheila Carreno-Madinabeitia, Ganix Esnaola, Santos J. González-Rojí, Gabriel Ibarra-Berastegi, and Alain Ulazia
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 3221–3240, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3221-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3221-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
A new diagram for the verification of vector variables (wind, current, etc.) generated by multiple models against a set of observations is presented in this package. It has been designed as a generalization of the Taylor diagram for two-dimensional quantities. It is based on the analysis of the two-dimensional structure of the mean squared error matrix between model and observations, and it allows for an easy assessment of both bias and directional errors as well.
Lei Ma, George C. Hurtt, Louise P. Chini, Ritvik Sahajpal, Julia Pongratz, Steve Frolking, Elke Stehfest, Kees Klein Goldewijk, Donal O'Leary, and Jonathan C. Doelman
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 3203–3220, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3203-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3203-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Earth system models require information on historical land cover change. We present transition rules to generate land cover change from newly developed land use dataset (Land-use Harmonization, LUH2). The resulting forest cover, vegetation carbon, and emissions from land use and land cover change are simulated and evaluated against remote sensing data and other studies. The rules can guide the incorporation of land-cover information within earth system models for CMIP6.
Keren Mezuman, Kostas Tsigaridis, Gregory Faluvegi, and Susanne E. Bauer
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 3091–3118, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3091-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3091-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Fires affect the composition of the atmosphere and Earth’s radiation balance by emitting a suite of reactive gases and particles. An interactive fire module in an Earth system model (ESM) allows us to study the natural and anthropogenic drivers, feedbacks, and interactions of open fires. To do so, we have developed pyrE, the NASA GISS interactive fire emissions module.
The main motivation behind this work is to have fire emissions reacting to climate change and anthropogenic activities.
Pierre Sepulchre, Arnaud Caubel, Jean-Baptiste Ladant, Laurent Bopp, Olivier Boucher, Pascale Braconnot, Patrick Brockmann, Anne Cozic, Yannick Donnadieu, Jean-Louis Dufresne, Victor Estella-Perez, Christian Ethé, Frédéric Fluteau, Marie-Alice Foujols, Guillaume Gastineau, Josefine Ghattas, Didier Hauglustaine, Frédéric Hourdin, Masa Kageyama, Myriam Khodri, Olivier Marti, Yann Meurdesoif, Juliette Mignot, Anta-Clarisse Sarr, Jérôme Servonnat, Didier Swingedouw, Sophie Szopa, and Delphine Tardif
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 3011–3053, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3011-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3011-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Our paper describes IPSL-CM5A2, an Earth system model that can be integrated for long (several thousands of years) climate simulations. We describe the technical aspects, assess the model computing performance and evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the model, by comparing pre-industrial and historical runs to the previous-generation model simulations and to observations. We also present a Cretaceous simulation as a case study to show how the model simulates deep-time paleoclimates.
Duane Waliser, Peter J. Gleckler, Robert Ferraro, Karl E. Taylor, Sasha Ames, James Biard, Michael G. Bosilovich, Otis Brown, Helene Chepfer, Luca Cinquini, Paul J. Durack, Veronika Eyring, Pierre-Philippe Mathieu, Tsengdar Lee, Simon Pinnock, Gerald L. Potter, Michel Rixen, Roger Saunders, Jörg Schulz, Jean-Noël Thépaut, and Matthias Tuma
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 2945–2958, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2945-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2945-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
This paper provides an update to an international research activity whose objective is to facilitate access to satellite and other types of regional and global datasets for evaluating global models used to produce 21st century climate projections.
Chein-Jung Shiu, Yi-Chi Wang, Huang-Hsiung Hsu, Wei-Ting Chen, Hua-Lu Pan, Ruiyu Sun, Yi-Hsuan Chen, and Cheng-An Chen
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2020-144, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2020-144, 2020
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
Short summary
Cloud macrophysics schemes are unique parameterizations for climate models to calculate cloud fraction. In this work, we propose an approach based on a probability density function that utilizes cloud condensates and saturation ratios to replace the assumption of critical relative humidity (RH). We validate the impact of this new developed macrophysics scheme on global climate simulations with satellite observations. This scheme can automatically respond to changes in RH in model grids.
Emmanuele Russo, Silje Lund Sørland, Ingo Kirchner, Martijn Schaap, Christoph C. Raible, and Ulrich Cubasch
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2020-196, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2020-196, 2020
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
Short summary
The parameter space of the RCM COSMO-CLM is investigated for the CORDEX Central Asia domain, using a Perturbed Physics Ensemble (PPE) with different parameter values. Results show that only a sub-set of model parameters present relevant changes in model performance and these changes depend on the considered region and variable: objective calibration methods are highly necessary in this case. Additionally, the results suggest the need of calibrating an RCM when targeting different domains.
Zhanshan Ma, Chuanfeng Zhao, Jiandong Gong, Jin Zhang, Zhe Li, Jian Sun, Yongzhu Liu, Jiong Chen, and Qingu Jiang
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2020-177, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2020-177, 2020
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
Short summary
The spin-up in GRAPES_GFS under different initial fields goes through the dramatic adjustment in the first half hour of integration and the slow dynamic and thermal adjustments afterwards. It lasts for at least 6 hours with model adjustment gradually completed from lower to upper layers in model. Thus, the forecast results at least in the first 6 hours should be avoided when used. Also, the spin-up process should repeat when when model simulation is interrupted.
Harald Rybka and Holger Tost
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 2671–2694, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2671-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2671-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Simulating cloud processes and their interactions with their environment is one of the biggest challenges in atmospheric science. This study couples a cloud-resolving model with a global climate model to improve the representation of small-scale processes for climate simulations. Unlike conventional approaches, tropical precipitation is better simulated with the new model setup. However, the diurnal cycle of precipitation and cloud amounts can be significantly influenced by the chosen setup.
Katja Matthes, Arne Biastoch, Sebastian Wahl, Jan Harlaß, Torge Martin, Tim Brücher, Annika Drews, Dana Ehlert, Klaus Getzlaff, Fritz Krüger, Willi Rath, Markus Scheinert, Franziska U. Schwarzkopf, Tobias Bayr, Hauke Schmidt, and Wonsun Park
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 2533–2568, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2533-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2533-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
A new Earth system model, the Flexible Ocean and Climate Infrastructure (FOCI), is introduced, consisting of a high-top atmosphere, an ocean model, sea-ice and land surface model components. A unique feature of FOCI is the ability to explicitly resolve small-scale oceanic features, for example, the Agulhas Current and the Gulf Stream. It allows to study the evolution of the climate system on regional and seasonal to (multi)decadal scales and bridges the gap to coarse-resolution climate models.
Vasileios Pavlidis, Eleni Katragkou, Andreas Prein, Aristeidis K. Georgoulias, Stergios Kartsios, Prodromos Zanis, and Theodoros Karacostas
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 2511–2532, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2511-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2511-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Our study investigates the role of aerosols in the climate of Europe by using a computer model and exploring different aerosol options available in this model as well as different aerosol datasets. Results show that aerosols can have a considerable impact on many aspects of the climate. Aerosols reduce solar radiation and temperature at the surface. Precipitation is not particularly affected in any specific direction. The cloudiness amount change is small. Also, changes in wind pattern are seen.
Doug McNeall, Jonny Williams, Richard Betts, Ben Booth, Peter Challenor, Peter Good, and Andy Wiltshire
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 2487–2509, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2487-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2487-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
In the climate model FAMOUS, matching the modelled Amazon rainforest to observations required different land surface parameter settings than for other forests. It was unclear if this discrepancy was due to a bias in the modelled climate or an error in the land surface component of the model. Correcting the climate of the model with a statistical model corrects the simulation of the Amazon forest, suggesting that the land surface component of the model is not the source of the discrepancy.
Vijay S. Mahadevan, Iulian Grindeanu, Robert Jacob, and Jason Sarich
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 2355–2377, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2355-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2355-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Accurate climate modeling of coupled Earth systems requires mapping of solution field data between dependent components that use non-matching discrete meshes. While existing workflows provide a pathway to generate the projection weights as an offline step, severe bottlenecks impede flexible setup of high-resolution models. In this paper, we present new algorithmic approaches to simplify the E3SM computational workflow using a scalable software infrastructure to generate the remapping operators.
Cited articles
Adler, R. F., Huffman, G. J., Chang, A., Ferraro, R., Xie, P. P., Janowiak,
J., Rudolf, B., Schneider, U., Curtis, S., Bolvin, D., Gruber, A., Susskind,
J., Arkin, P., and Nelkin, E.: The Version 2 Global Precipitation Climatology
Project (GPCP) Monthly Precipitation Analysis (1979-0Present), J.
Hydrometeor., 4, 1147–1167,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1525-7541(2003)004<1147:TVGPCP>2.0.CO;2, 2003.
Allen, M.: Do-it-yourself climate prediction, Nature, 401, 642,
https://doi.org/10.1038/44266, 1999.
Annan, J. D. and Hargreaves, J. C.: Efficient estimation and ensemble
generation in climate modelling, Philos. T. Roy. Soc. A, 365, 2077–2088,
2007.
Annan, J. D., Lunt, D. J., Hargreaves, J. C., and Valdes, P. J.: Parameter
estimation in an atmospheric GCM using the Ensemble Kalman Filter, Nonlin.
Processes Geophys., 12, 363–371, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-12-363-2005,
2005.
Bellprat, O., Kotlarski, S., Lüthi, D., and Schär, C.: Exploring
perturbed physics ensembles in a regional climate model, J. Climate, 25,
4582–4599, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00275.1, 2012a.
Bellprat, O., Kotlarski, S., Lüthi, D., and Schär, C.: Objective
calibration of regional climate models, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, D23115,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD018262, 2012b.
Bellprat, O., Kotlarski, S., Lüthi, D., De Elía, R., Frigon, A.,
Laprise, R., and Schär, C.: Objective calibration of regional climate
models: application over Europe and North America, J. Climate, 29, 819–838,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0302.1, 2016.
Boberg, F. and Christensen, J. H.: Overestimation of Mediterranean summer
temperature projections due to model deficiencies, Nat. Clim. Change, 2,
433–436, https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1454, 2012.
Booth, B. B. B., Jones, C. D., Collins, M., Totterdell, I. J., Cox, P. M.,
Sitch, S., Huntingford, C., Betts, R. A., Harris, G. R., and Lloyd, J.: High
sensitivity of future global warming to land carbon cycle processes, Environ.
Res. Lett., 7, 024002, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/7/2/024002, 2012.
Brown, T. J., Hall, B. L., and Westerling, A. L.: The impact of twenty-first
century climate change on wildland fire danger in the western United States:
an applications perspective, Climatic Change, 62, 365–388, 2004.
Carslaw, K. S., Lee, L. A., Reddington, C. L., Pringle, K. J., Rap, A.,
Forster, P. M., Mann, G. W., Spracklen, D. V., Woodhouse, M. T., Regayre, L.
A., and Pierce, J. R.: Large contribution of natural aerosols to uncertainty
in indirect forcing, Nature, 503, 67–71, 2013.
Cheruy, F., Dufresne, J. L., Hourdin, F., and Ducharne, A.: Role of clouds
and land-atmosphere coupling in midlatitude continental summer warm biases
and climate change amplification in CMIP5 simulations, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
41, 6493–6500, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL061145, 2014.
Collins, M., Booth, B. B., Harris, G. R., Murphy, J. M., Sexton, D. M., and
Webb, M. J.: Towards quantifying uncertainty in transient climate change,
Clim. Dynam., 27, 127–147, 2006.
Collins, M., Booth, B. B., Bhaskaran, B., Harris, G. R., Murphy, J. M.,
Sexton, D. M., and Webb, M. J.: Climate model errors, feedbacks and forcings:
a comparison of perturbed physics and multi-model ensembles, Clim. Dynam.,
36, 1737–1766, 2011.
Collins, W. J., Bellouin, N., Doutriaux-Boucher, M., Gedney, N., Hinton, T.,
Jones, C. D., Liddicoat, S., Martin, G., O'Connor, F., Rae, J., Senior, C.,
Totterdell, I., Woodward, S., Reichler, T., and Kim, J.: Evaluation of the
HadGEM2 model, Hadley Cent. Tech. Note, 74, Met Office Hadley Centre, Exter, UK, 2008.
Compo, G. P., Whitaker, J. S., Sardeshmukh, P. D., Matsui, N., Allan, R. J.,
Yin, X., Gleason, B. E., Vose, R. S., Rutledge, G., Bessemoulin, P.,
Brönnimann, S., Brunet, M., Crouthamel, R. I., Grant, A. N., Groisman, P.
Y., Jones, P. D., Kruk, M. C., Kruger, A. C., Marshall, G. J., Maugeri, M.,
Mok, H. Y., Nordli, Ø., Ross, T. F., Trigo, R. M., Wang, X. L., Woodruff,
S. D., and Worley, S. J.: The Twentieth Century Reanalysis Project, Q. J.
Roy. Meteor. Soc., 137, 1–28, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.776, 2011.
Cox, P. M., Betts, R. A., Bunton, C. B., Essery, R. L. H., Rowntree, P. R.,
and Smith, J.: The impact of new land surface physics on the GCM simulation
of climate and climate sensitivity, Clim. Dynam., 15, 183–203, 1999.
Daly, C., Halbleib, M., Smith, J. I., Gibson, W. P., Doggett, M. K., Taylor,
G. H., Curtis, J., and Pasteris, P. P.: Physiographically sensitive mapping
of climatological temperature and precipitation across the conterminous
United States, Int. J. Climatol., 28, 2031–2064, 2008.
Dee, D. P., Uppala, S. M., Simmons, A. J., Berrisford, P., Poli, P.,
Kobayashi, S., Andrae, U., Balmaseda, M. A., Balsamo, G., Bauer, P.,
Bechtold, P., Beljaars, A. C. M., van de Berg, L., Bidlot, J., Bormann, N.,
Delsol, C., Dragani, R., Fuentes, M., Geer, A. J., Haimberger, L., Healy, S.
B., Hersbach, H., Hólm, E. V., Isaksen, L., Kållberg, P., Köhler,
M., Matricardi, M., McNally, A. P., Monge-Sanz, B. M., Morcrette, J. J.,
Park, B. K., Peubey, C., de Rosnay, P., Tavolato, C., Thépaut, J. N., and
Vitart, F.: The ERA-Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the
data assimilation system, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 137, 553–597, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.828, 2011.
Essery, R. L. H., Best, M. J., Betts, R. A., Cox, P. M., and Taylor, C. M.:
Explicit Representation of Subgrid Heterogeneity in a GCM Land Surface
Scheme, J. Hydrometeorol., 4, 530–543,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1525-7541(2003)004<0530:EROSHI>2.0.CO;2, 2003.
Fan, Y. and van den Dool, H.: A Global Monthly Land Surface Air Temperature
Analysis for 1948–Present, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D01103, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008470,
2008.
Fowler, H. J., Blenkinsop, S., and Tebaldi, C.: Linking climate change
modelling to impacts studies: recent advances in downscaling techniques for
hydrological modelling, Int. J. Climatol., 27, 1547–1578, 2007.
Gelaro, R., McCarty, W., Suárez, M. J., Todling, R., Molod, A., Takacs,
L., Randles, C. A., Darmenov, A., Bosilovich, M. G., Reichle, R., and Wargan,
K.: The modern-era retrospective analysis for research and applications,
version 2 (MERRA-2), J. Climate, 30, 5419–5454,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0758.1, 2017.
Gordon, C., Cooper, C., Senior, C. A., Banks, H., Gregory, J. M., Johns, T. C., Mitchell, J. F., and Wood, R. A.: The simulation of SST, sea ice extents and ocean heat transports in a version of the Hadley Centre coupled model without flux adjustments, Clim. Dynam., 16, 147–168, 2000.
Gregory, D. and Rowntree, P. R.: A mass flux convection scheme with
representation of cloud ensemble characteristics and stability-dependent
closure, Mon. Weather Rev., 118, 1483–1506, 1990.
Guillod, B. P., Jones, R. G., Bowery, A., Haustein, K., Massey, N. R.,
Mitchell, D. M., Otto, F. E. L., Sparrow, S. N., Uhe, P., Wallom, D. C. H.,
Wilson, S., and Allen, M. R.: weather@home 2: validation of an improved
global–regional climate modelling system, Geosci. Model Dev., 10,
1849–1872, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-1849-2017, 2017.
Guillod, B. P., Jones, R. G., Dadson, S. J., Coxon, G., Bussi, G., Freer, J.,
Kay, A. L., Massey, N. R., Sparrow, S. N., Wallom, D. C. H., Allen, M. R.,
and Hall, J. W.: A large set of potential past, present and future
hydro-meteorological time series for the UK, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22,
611–634, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-611-2018, 2018.
Hall, A. and Qu, X.: Using the current seasonal cycle to constrain snow
albedo feedback in future climate change, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L03502, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL025127,
2006.
Harris, G. R., Sexton, D. M., Booth, B. B., Collins, M., and Murphy, J. M.:
Probabilistic projections of transient climate change, Clim. Dynam., 40,
2937–2972, 2013.
Harris, I. P. D. J., Jones, P. D., Osborn, T. J., and Lister, D. H.: Updated
high-resolution grids of monthly climatic observations–the CRU TS3. 10
Dataset, Int. J. Climatol., 34, 623–642, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3711, 2014.
Hartmann, D. L., Ockert-Bell, M. E., and Michelsen, M. L.: The effect of
cloud type on Earth's energy balance: Global analysis, J. Climate, 5,
1281–1304, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1992)005<1281:TEOCTO>2.0.CO;2, 1992.
Hawkins, E., Osborne, T. M., Ho, C. K., and Challinor, A. J.: Calibration and
bias correction of climate projections for crop modelling: an idealised case
study over Europe, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 170, 19–31, 2013.
Hourdin, F., Grandpeix, J.-Y., Rio, C., Bony, S., Jam, A., Cheruy, F.,
Rochetin, N., Fairhead, L., Idelkadi, A., Musat, I., Dufresne, J. L.,
Lahellec, A., Lefebvre, M.-P., and Roehrig, R.: LMDZ5B: the atmospheric
component of the IPSL climate model with revisited parameterizations for
clouds and convection, Clim. Dynam., 40, 2193–2222,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-012-1343-y, 2013.
Huffman, G., Bolvin, D., Braithwaite, D., Hsu, K., Joyce, R., and Xie, P:
Integrated Multi-satellitE Retrievals for GPM (IMERG), version 4.4. NASA's
Precipitation Processing Center, available at:
ftp://arthurhou.pps.eosdis.nasa.gov/gpmdata/ (last access: 31 March
2015), 2014.
Irvine, P. J., Gregoire, L. J., Lunt, D. J., and Valdes, P. J.: An efficient
method to generate a perturbed parameter ensemble of a fully coupled AOGCM
without flux-adjustment, Geosci. Model Dev., 6, 1447–1462,
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-1447-2013, 2013.
Jackson, C., Sen, M. K., and Stoffa, P. L.: An efficient stochastic Bayesian
approach to optimal parameter and uncertainty estimation for climate model
predictions, J. Climate, 17, 2828–2841, 2004.
Jackson, C. S., Sen, M. K., Huerta, G., Deng, Y., and Bowman, K. P.: Error
reduction and convergence in climate prediction, J. Climate, 21, 6698–6709,
2008.
Järvinen, H., Räisänen, P., Laine, M., Tamminen, J., Ilin, A.,
Oja, E., Solonen, A., and Haario, H.: Estimation of ECHAM5 climate model
closure parameters with adaptive MCMC, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 9993–10002,
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-9993-2010, 2010.
Johns, T. C., Durman, C. F., Banks, H. T., Roberts, M. J., McLaren, A. J.,
Ridley, J. K., Senior, C. A., Williams, K. D., Jones, A., Rickard, G. J.,
Cusack, S., Ingram, W. I., Crucifix, M., Sexton, D. M. H., Joshi, M. M.,
Dong, B.-W., Spencer, H., Hill, R. S. R., Gregory, J. M., Keen, A. B.,
Pardaens, A. K., Lowe, J. A., Bodas-Salcedo, A., Stark, S., and Searl, Y.:
The new Hadley Centre climate model (HadGEM1): Evaluation of coupled
simulations, J. Climate, 19, 1327–1353, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3712.1, 2006.
Kalnay, E., Kanamitsu, M., Kistler, R., Collins, W., Deaven, D., Gandin, L.,
Iredell, M., Saha, S., White, G., Woollen, J., Zhu, Y., Chelliah, M.,
Ebisuzaki, W., Higgins, W., Janowiak, J., Mo, K. C., Ropelewski, C., Wang,
J., Leetmaa, A., Reynolds, R., Jenne, R., and Joseph, D.: The NCEP/NCAR
40-Year Reanalysis Project, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 77, 437–471, 1996.
Karmalkar, A. V., Sexton, D. M., Murphy, J. M., Booth, B. B., Rostron, J. W.,
and McNeall, D. J.: Finding plausible and diverse variants of a climate
model. Part II: development and validation of methodology, Clim. Dynam.,
53, 847–877, 2019.
Knutti, R., Stocker, T. F., Joos, F., and Plattner, G. K.: Probabilistic
climate change projections using neural networks, Clim. Dynam., 21, 257–272,
2003.
Kotlarski, S., Keuler, K., Christensen, O. B., Colette, A., Déqué,
M., Gobiet, A., Goergen, K., Jacob, D., Lüthi, D., van Meijgaard, E.,
Nikulin, G., Schär, C., Teichmann, C., Vautard, R., Warrach-Sagi, K., and
Wulfmeyer, V.: Regional climate modeling on European scales: a joint standard
evaluation of the EURO-CORDEX RCM ensemble, Geosci. Model Dev., 7,
1297–1333, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-1297-2014, 2014.
Langenbrunner, B., Neelin, J. D., Lintner, B. R., and Anderson, B. T.:
Patterns of precipitation change and climatological uncertainty among CMIP5
models, with a focus on the midlatitude Pacific storm track, J. Climate, 28,
7857–7872, 2015.
Li, S., Mote, P. W., Rupp, D. E., Vickers, D., Mera, R., and Allen, M. R.:
Evaluation of a regional climate modeling effort for the western United
States using a superensemble from weather@ home, J. Climate, 28, 7470–7488,
2015.
Liu, C., Ikeda, K., Rasmussen, R., Barlage, M., Newman, A. J., Prein, A. F.,
Chen, F., Chen, L., Clark, M., Dai, A. Dudhia, J., Eidhammer, T., Gochis, D.,
Gutmann, E., Kurkute, S., Li, Y., Thompson, G., and Yates, D.:
Continental-scale convection-permitting modeling of the current and future
climate of North America, Clim. Dynam, 49, 71–95,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-3327-9, 2017.
Loeppky, J. L., Sacks, J., and Welch, W. J.: Choosing the Sample Size of a
Computer Experiment: a Practical Guide, Technometrics, 51, 366–376, 2009.
Ma, H. Y., Klein, S. A., Xie, S., Zhang, C., Tang, S., Tang, Q., Morcrette,
C. J., Van Weverberg, K., Petch, J., Ahlgrimm, M., Berg, L. K., Cheruy, F.,
Cole, J., Forbes, R., Gustafson Jr., W. I., Huang, M., Liu, Y., Merryfield,
W., Qian, Y., Roehrig, R., and Wang, Y.-C.: CAUSES: On the role of surface
energy budget errors to the warm surface air temperature error over the
Central United States, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123, 2888–2909,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027194, 2018.
Massey, N., Jones, R., Otto, F. E. L., Aina, T., Wilson, S., Murphy, J. M.,
Hassell, D., Yamazaki, Y. H., and Allen, M. R.: weather@home – development
and validation of a very large ensemble modelling system for probabilistic
event attribution, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 141, 1528–1545,
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2455, 2015.
Mauritsen, T., Stevens, B., Roeckner, E., Crueger, T., Esch, M., Giorgetta,
M., Haak, H., Jungclaus, J., Klocke, D., Matei, D., Mikolajewicz, U., Notz,
D., Pincus, R., Schmidt, H., and Tomassini, L.: Tuning the climate of a
global model, J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 4, M00A01,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2012MS000154, 2012.
McKay, M. D., Beckman, R. J., and Conover, W. J.: Comparison of three methods
for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a
computer code, Technometrics, 21, 239–245, 1979.
McNeall, D. J., Challenor, P. G., Gattiker, J. R., and Stone, E. J.: The
potential of an observational data set for calibration of a computationally
expensive computer model, Geosci. Model Dev., 6, 1715–1728,
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-1715-2013, 2013.
McNeall, D., Williams, J., Booth, B., Betts, R., Challenor, P., Wiltshire,
A., and Sexton, D.: The impact of structural error on parameter constraint in
a climate model, Earth Syst. Dynam., 7, 917–935,
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-7-917-2016, 2016.
Mearns, L. O., Arritt, R., Biner, S., Bukovsky, M. S., McGinnis, S., Sain,
S., Caya, D., Correia Jr., J., Flory, D., Gutowski, W., Takle, E. S., Jones,
R., Leung, R., Moufouma-Okia, W., McDaniel, L., Nues, A. M. B., Qian, Y.,
Roads, J., Sloan., L., and Snyder, M.: The North American regional climate
change assessment program: overview of phase I results, B. Am. Meteorol.
Soc., 93, 1337–1362, 2012.
Merrifield, A. L. and Xie, S. P.: Summer US surface air temperature
variability: Controlling factors and AMIP simulation biases, J. Climate, 29,
5123–5139, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0705.1, 2016.
Mitchell, D., Heaviside, C., Vardoulakis, S., Huntingford, C., Masato, G.,
Guillod, B. P., Frumhoff, P., Bowery, A., Wallom, D., and Allen, M.:
Attributing human mortality during extreme heat waves to anthropogenic
climate change, Environ. Res. Lett., 11, 074006,
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/7/074006, 2016.
Mock, C. J.: Climatic Controls and Spatial Variations of Precipitation in the
Western United States, J. Climate, 9, 1111–1125, 1996.
Morcrette, C. J., Van Weverberg, K., Ma, H. Y., Ahlgrimm, M., Bazile, E.,
Berg, L. K., Cheng, A., Cheruy, F., Cole, J., Forbes, R., and Gustafson Jr.,
W. I.: Introduction to CAUSES: Description of weather and climate models and
their near-surface temperature errors in 5 day hindcasts near the Southern
Great Plains, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123, 2655–2683,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027199, 2018.
Mote, P. W., Allen, M. R., Jones, R. G., Li, S., Mera, R., Rupp, D. E.,
Salahuddin, A., and Vickers, D.: Superensemble regional climate modeling for
the western United States, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 97, 203–215,
https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00090.1, 2016.
Mueller, B. and Seneviratne. S. I.: Systematic land climate and
evapotranspiration biases in CMIP5 simulations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41,
128–134, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013GL058055, 2014.
Mulholland, D. P., Haines, K., Sparrow, S. N., and Wallom, D.: Climate model
forecast biases assessed with a perturbed physics ensemble, Clim. Dynam., 49,
1729–1746, 2017.
Murphy, J. M., Sexton, D. M. H., Barnett, D. N., Jones, G. S., Webb, M. J.,
Collins, M., and Stainforth, D. A.: Quantification of modelling uncertainties
in a large ensemble of climate change simulations, Nature, 430, 768–772,
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02771, 2004.
Murphy, J. M., Booth, B. B., Collins, M., Harris, G. R., Sexton, D. M., and
Webb, M. J.: A methodology for probabilistic predictions of regional climate
change from perturbed physics ensembles. Philos. T. Roy. Soc. A, 365,
1993–2028, 2007.
Murphy, J. M., Sexton, D. M. H., Jenkins, G. J., Boorman, P. M., Booth, B. B. B., Brown, C. C., Clark, R. T., Collins, M., Harris, G. R., Kendon, E. J., and Betts, R. A.: UK climate projections science report: climate change projections, Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter, UK, 21–35, 2009.
Neelin, J. D., Bracco, A., Luo, H., McWilliams, J. C., and Meyerson, J. E.:
Considerations for parameter optimization and sensitivity in climate models,
P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 21349–21354, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1015473107,
2010.
Neelin, J. D., Langenbrunner, B., Meyerson, J. E., Hall, A., and Berg, N.:
California winter precipitation change under global warming in the Coupled
Model Intercomparison Project phase 5 ensemble, J. Climate, 26, 6238–6256,
2013.
Onogi, K., Tsutsui, J., Koide, H., Sakamoto, M., Kobayashi, S., Hatsushika,
H., Matsumoto, T., Yamazaki, N., Kamahori, H., Takahashi, K., Kadokura, S.,
Wada, K., Kato, K., Oyama, R., Ose, T., Mannoji, N., and Taira, R.: The
JRA-25 Reanalysis, J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn., 85, 369–432,
https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.85.369, 2007.
Otto, F. E. L., Massey, N., van Oldenborgh, G. J., Jones, R. G., and Allen,
M. R.: Reconciling Two Approaches to Attribution of the 2010 Russian Heat
Wave, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L04702, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL050422, 2012.
Rosenzweig, C., Elliott, J., Deryng, D., Ruane, A. C., Müller, C.,
Arneth, A., Boote, K. J., Folberth, C., Glotter, M., Khabarov, N., Neumann,
K., Piontek, F., Pugh, T. A. M., Schmid, E., Stehfest, E., Yang, H., and
Jones, J. W.: Assessing agricultural risks of climate change in the 21st
century in a global gridded crop model intercomparison, P. Natl. Acad. Sci.
USA, 111, 3268–3273, 2014.
Rougier, J. C., Sexton, D. M. H., Murphy, J. M., and Stainforth, D.:
Analyzing the climate sensitivity of the HadSM3 climate model using ensembles
from different but related experiments, J. Climate, 22, 3540–3557,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JCLI2533.1, 2009.
Roustant, O., Ginsbourger, D., and Deville, Y.: DiceKriging, DiceOptim: Two R
Packages for the Analysis of Computer Experiments by Kriging-Based
Metamodeling and Optimization, J. Stat. Softw., 51, p. 54, 2012.
Rowlands, D. J., Frame, D. J., Ackerley, D., Aina, T., Booth, B. B.,
Christensen, C., and Gryspeerdt, E.: Broad range of 2050 warming from an
observationally constrained large climate model ensemble, Nat. Geosci., 5,
256–260, 2012.
Rupp, D. E. and Li, S.: Less warming projected during heavy winter
precipitation in the Cascades and Sierra Nevada, Int. J. Climatol., 37,
3984–3990, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4963, 2017.
Rupp, D. E., Li, S., Mote, P. W., Massey, N., Sparrow, S. N., and Wallom, D.
C.: Influence of the Ocean and Greenhouse Gases on Severe Drought Likelihood
in the Central US in 2012, J. Climate, 30, 1789–1806,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0294.1, 2017a.
Rupp, D. E., Li, S., Mote, P. W., Shell, K. M., Massey, N., Sparrow, S. N.,
Wallom, D. C. H., and Allen, M. R.: Seasonal Spatial Patterns of Projected
Anthropogenic Warming in Complex Terrain: A Modeling Study of the Western
USA, Clim. Dynam., 48, 2191–2213, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-3200-x, 2017b.
Saha, S., Moorthi, S., Pan, H.L., Wu, X., Wang, J., Nadiga, S., Tripp, P.,
Kistler, R., Woollen, J., Behringer, D., and Liu, H.: The NCEP climate
forecast system reanalysis, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 91, 1015–1058, 2010.
Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., and Chan, K. S.: A quantitative
model-independent method for global sensitivity analysis of model output,
Technometrics, 41, 39–56, 1999.
Sanderson, B. M.: A multimodel study of parametric uncertainty in predictions
of climate response to rising greenhouse gas concentrations, J. Climate, 24,
1362–1377, 2011.
Sanderson, B. M., Knutti, R., Aina, T., Christensen, C., Faull, N., Frame, D.
J., Ingram, W. J., Piani, C., Stainforth, D. A., Stone, D. A., and Allen, M.
R.: Constraints on model response to greenhouse gas forcing and the role of
subgrid-scale processes, J. Climate, 21, 2384–2400, 2008a.
Sanderson, B. M., Piani, C., Ingram, W. J., Stone, D. A., and Allen, M. R.:
Towards constraining climate sensitivity by linear analysis of feedback
patterns in thousands of perturbed-physics GCM simulations, Clim. Dynam., 30,
175–190, 2008b.
Sanderson, B. M., Shell, K. M., and Ingram, W.: Climate feedbacks determined
using radiative kernels in a multi-thousand member ensemble of AOGCMs, Clim.
Dynam., 35, 1219–1236, 2010.
Schaller, N., Kay, A. L., Lamb, R., Massey, N. R., van Oldenborgh, G. J.,
Otto, F. E. L., Sparrow, S. N., Vautard, R., Yiou, P., Ashpole, I., Bowery,
A., Crooks, S. M., Haustein, K., Huntingford, C., Ingram, W. J., Jones, R.
G., Legg, T., Miller, J., Skeggs, J., Wallom, D., Weisheimer, A., Wilson, S.,
Stott, P. A., and Allen, M. R.: Human Influence on Climate in the 2014
Southern England Winter Floods and Their Impacts, Nat. Clim. Change, 6,
627–634, 2016.
Schirber, S., Klocke, D., Pincus, R., Quaas, J., and Anderson, J. L.:
Parameter estimation using data assimilation in an atmospheric general
circulation model: From a perfect toward the real world, J. Adv. Model. Earth
Syst., 5, 58–70, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012MS000167, 2013.
Schneider, U., Becker, A., Finger, P., Meyer-Christoffer, A., Rudolf, B., and
Ziese, M.: GPCC Full Data Reanalysis Version 6.0 at 0.5∘: Monthly
Land-Surface Precipitation from Rain-Gauges built on GTS-based and Historic
Data, https://doi.org/10.5676/DWD_GPCC/FD_M_V6_050, 2011.
Seager, R., Neelin, D., Simpson, I., Liu, H., Henderson, N., Shaw, T.,
Kushnir, Y., Ting, M., and Cook, B.: Dynamical and thermodynamical causes of
large-scale changes in the hydrological cycle over North America in response
to global warming, J. Climate, 27, 7921–7948, 2014.
Seneviratne, S. I., Lüthi, D., Litschi, M., and Schär, C.:
Land–atmosphere coupling and climate change in Europe, Nature, 443, 205–209,
2006.
Sexton, D. M. and Murphy, J. M.: Multivariate probabilistic projections using
imperfect climate models. Part II: robustness of methodological choices and
consequences for climate sensitivity, Clim. Dynam., 38, 2543–2558, 2012.
Sexton, D. M., Murphy, J. M., Collins, M., and Webb, M. J.: Multivariate
probabilistic projections using imperfect climate models part I: outline of
methodology, Clim. Dynam., 38, 2513–2542, 2012.
Sexton, D. M. H., Karmalkar, A. V., Murphy, J. M., Williams, K. D., Boutle,
I. A., Morcrette, C. J., Stirling, A. J., and Vosper, S. B.: Finding
plausible and diverse variants of a climate model. Part 1: establishing the
relationship between errors at weather and climate time scales, Clim. Dynam., 53,
1–34, 2019.
Shiogama, H., Watanabe, M., Yoshimori, M., Yokohata, T., Ogura, T., Annan, J. D., Hargreaves, J. C., Abe, M., Kamae, Y., O'ishi, R., and Nobui, R.: Perturbed physics ensemble using the MIROC5 coupled atmosphere–ocean GCM without flux corrections: experimental design and results, Clim. Dynam., 39, 3041–3056, 2012.
Sippel, S., Otto, F. E. L., Forkel, M., Allen, M. R., Guillod, B. P.,
Heimann, M., Reichstein, M., Seneviratne, S. I., Thonicke, K., and Mahecha,
M. D.: A novel bias correction methodology for climate impact simulations,
Earth Syst. Dynam., 7, 71–88, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-7-71-2016, 2016.
Solomon, S., Qin, D., Manning, M., Chen, Z., Marquis, M., Averyt, K. B.,
Tignor, M., and Miller, H. L.: Climate change 2007: The physical science
basis, in: Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of
the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2007 Cambridge University
Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, 2007.
Sparrow, S., Wallom, D., Mulholland, D. P., and Haines, K.: Climate model
forecast biases assessed with a perturbed physics ensemble, Clim. Dynam., 49, 1729–1746,
2016.
Stainforth, D. A., Aina, T., Christensen, C., Collins, M., Faull, N., Frame,
D. J., Kettleborough, J. A., Knight, S., Martin, A., Murphy, J., Piani, C.,
Sexton, D., Smith, L. A., Spicer, R. A., Thorpe, A. J., and Allen, M. R.:
Uncertainty in predictions of the climate response to rising levels of
greenhouse gases, Nature, 433, 403–406, 2005.
Stephens, G. L.: Cloud feedbacks in the climate system: A critical review, J.
Climate, 18, 237–273, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-3243.1, 2005.
Stephens, G. L., Li, J., Wild, M., Clayson, C. A., Loeb, N., Kato, S.,
L'ecuyer, T., Stackhouse Jr., P. W., Lebsock, M., and Andrews, T.: An update
on Earth's energy balance in light of the latest global observations, Nat.
Geosci., 5, 691–696, 2012.
Stott, P. A., Stone, D. A., and Allen, M. R.: Human contribution to the
European heatwave of 2003, Nature, 432, 610–614, 2004.
Tett, S. F., Mitchell, J. F., Parker, D. E., and Allen, M. R.: Human
influence on the atmospheric vertical temperature structure: Detection and
observations, Science, 274, 1170–1173, 1996.
Tett, S. F. B., Yamazaki, K., Mineter, M. J., Cartis, C., and Eizenberg, N.:
Calibrating climate models using inverse methods: case studies with HadAM3,
HadAM3P and HadCM3, Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 3567–3589,
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3567-2017, 2017.
Uhe, P., Philip, S., Kew, S., Shah, K., Kimutai, J., Mwangi, E., van
Oldenborgh, G. J., Singh, R., Arrighi, J., Jjemba, E., Cullen, H., and Otto,
F. E. L.: Attributing Drivers of the 2016 Kenyan Drought, Int. J. Climatol.,
38, e554–e568, 2018.
van Oldenborgh, G. J., Otto, F. E. L., Haustein, K., and AchutaRao, K.: The
Heavy Precipitation Rvent of December 2015 in Chennai, India, In Explaining
Extremes of 2015 from a Climate Perspective, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 97,
S87–S91, 2016.
van Oldenborgh, G. J., van der Wiel, K., Sebastian, A., Singh, R., Arrighi,
J., Otto, F. E. L., Haustein, K., Li, S., Vecchi, G., and Cullen, H.:
Attribution of Extreme Rainfall from Hurricane Harvey, August 2017, Environ.
Res. Lett., 12, 124009, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaa343, 2017.
Van Weverberg, K., Morcrette, C. J., Petch, J., Klein, S. A., Ma, H. Y.,
Zhang, C., Xie, S., Tang, Q., Gustafson Jr., W. I., Qian, Y., and Berg, L.
K.: CAUSES: Attribution of surface radiation biases in NWP and climate models
near the U.S. Southern Great Plains, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123,
3612–3644, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027188, 2018.
Williams, J. H. T., Smith, R. S., Valdes, P. J., Booth, B. B. B., and Osprey,
A.: Optimising the FAMOUS climate model: inclusion of global carbon cycling,
Geosci. Model Dev., 6, 141–160, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-141-2013,
2013.
Williamson, D., Goldstein, M., Allison, L., Blaker, A., Challenor, P.,
Jackson, L., and Yamazaki, K.: History matching for exploring and reducing
climate model parameter space using observations and a large perturbed
physics ensemble, Clim. Dynam., 41, 1703–1729, 2013.
Williamson, D., Blaker, A. T., Hampton, C., and Salter, J.: Identifying and
removing structural biases in climate models with history matching, Clim.
Dynam., 45, 1299–1324, 2015.
Williamson, D. B., Blaker, A. T., and Sinha, B.: Tuning without over-tuning:
parametric uncertainty quantification for the NEMO ocean model, Geosci. Model
Dev., 10, 1789–1816, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-1789-2017, 2017.
Wu, X.: Effects of ice mircrophysics on tropical radiative-convective-oceanic
quasi-equilibrium states, J. Atmos. Sci., 59, 1885–1897, 2002.
Xie, P. and Arkin, P. A.: Global precipitation: a 17-year monthly analysis
based on gauge observations, satellite estimates, and numerical model
outputs, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 78, 2539–2558, 1996.
Yamazaki, K., Rowlands, D. J., Aina, T., Blaker, A., Bowery, A., Massey, N.,
Miller, J., Rye, C., Tett, S. F. B., Williamson, D., Yamazaki, Y. H., and
Allen, M. R.: Obtaining diverse behaviors in a climate model without the use
of flux adjustments, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 2781–2793,
https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50304, 2013.
Zhang, C., Xie, S., Klein, S. A., Ma, H.Y ., Tang, S., Van Weverberg, K.,
Morcrette, C. J., and Petch, J.: CAUSES: Diagnosis of the summertime warm
bias in CMIP5 climate models at the ARM Southern Great Plains site, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123, 2968–2992, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027200, 2018.
Zhang, T., Li, L., Lin, Y., Xue, W., Xie, F., Xu, H., and Huang, X.: An
automatic and effective parameter optimization method for model tuning,
Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 3579–3591, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-3579-2015,
2015.
Search articles
Short summary
Understanding the unfolding challenges of climate change relies on climate models, many of which have regional biases larger than the expected climate signal over the next half-century. This work shows the potential for improving climate model simulations through a multiphased parameter refinement approach. Regional warm biases are substantially reduced, suggesting this iterative approach is one path to improving climate models and simulations of present and future climate.
Understanding the unfolding challenges of climate change relies on climate models, many of which...
Geoscientific Model Development
An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.