Articles | Volume 12, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1613-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1613-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Model evaluation paper
| 
24 Apr 2019
Model evaluation paper |
| 24 Apr 2019
| 24 Apr 2019
The Brazilian Earth System Model ocean–atmosphere (BESM-OA) version 2.5: evaluation of its CMIP5 historical simulation
Sandro F. Veiga
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Earth System Science Center (CCST), National Institute for Space
Research (INPE), São José dos Campos 12227-010, São Paulo,
Brazil
Paulo Nobre
Center for Weather Forecasting and Climate Studies (CPTEC), National
Institute for Space Research (INPE), Cachoeira Paulista 12630-000, São
Paulo, Brazil
Emanuel Giarolla
Center for Weather Forecasting and Climate Studies (CPTEC), National
Institute for Space Research (INPE), São José dos Campos 12227-010,
São Paulo, Brazil
Vinicius Capistrano
Amazonas State University (UEA), Manaus 69005-010, Amazonas, Brazil
Manoel Baptista Jr.
Center for Weather Forecasting and Climate Studies (CPTEC), National
Institute for Space Research (INPE), Cachoeira Paulista 12630-000, São
Paulo, Brazil
André L. Marquez
Center for Weather Forecasting and Climate Studies (CPTEC), National
Institute for Space Research (INPE), Cachoeira Paulista 12630-000, São
Paulo, Brazil
Silvio Nilo Figueroa
Center for Weather Forecasting and Climate Studies (CPTEC), National
Institute for Space Research (INPE), Cachoeira Paulista 12630-000, São
Paulo, Brazil
José Paulo Bonatti
Center for Weather Forecasting and Climate Studies (CPTEC), National
Institute for Space Research (INPE), Cachoeira Paulista 12630-000, São
Paulo, Brazil
Paulo Kubota
Center for Weather Forecasting and Climate Studies (CPTEC), National
Institute for Space Research (INPE), Cachoeira Paulista 12630-000, São
Paulo, Brazil
Carlos A. Nobre
Institute for Advanced Studies, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-050, São Paulo, Brazil
Related authors
Vinicius Buscioli Capistrano, Paulo Nobre, Sandro F. Veiga, Renata Tedeschi, Josiane Silva, Marcus Bottino, Manoel Baptista da Silva Jr., Otacílio Leandro Menezes Neto, Silvio Nilo Figueroa, José Paulo Bonatti, Paulo Yoshio Kubota, Julio Pablo Reyes Fernandez, Emanuel Giarolla, Jessica Vial, and Carlos A. Nobre
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 2277–2296, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2277-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2277-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
This work represents the product of our recent efforts to develop a Brazilian climate model and helps address some scientific issues on the frontier of knowledge (e.g., cloud feedback studies). The BESM results show climate sensitivity and thermodynamical responses similar to a CMIP5 ensemble. More than that, BESM has the objective of being an additional climate model with the ability to reproduce changes that are physically understood in order to study the global climate system.
Forrest M. Hoffman, Birgit Hassler, Ranjini Swaminathan, Jared Lewis, Bouwe Andela, Nathaniel Collier, Dóra Hegedűs, Jiwoo Lee, Charlotte Pascoe, Mika Pflüger, Martina Stockhause, Paul Ullrich, Min Xu, Lisa Bock, Felicity Chun, Bettina K. Gier, Douglas I. Kelley, Axel Lauer, Julien Lenhardt, Manuel Schlund, Mohanan G. Sreeush, Katja Weigel, Ed Blockley, Rebecca Beadling, Romain Beucher, Demiso D. Dugassa, Valerio Lembo, Jianhua Lu, Swen Brands, Jerry Tjiputra, Elizaveta Malinina, Brian Mederios, Enrico Scoccimarro, Jeremy Walton, Philip Kershaw, André L. Marquez, Malcolm J. Roberts, Eleanor O’Rourke, Elisabeth Dingley, Briony Turner, Helene Hewitt, and John P. Dunne
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2685, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2685, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Short summary
As Earth system models become more complex, rapid and comprehensive evaluation through comparison with observational data is necessary. The upcoming Assessment Fast Track for the Seventh Phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP7) will require fast analysis. This paper describes a new Rapid Evaluation Framework (REF) that was developed for the Assessment Fast Track that will be run at the Earth System Grid Federation (ESGF) to inform the community about the performance of models.
Baylor Fox-Kemper, Patricia DeRepentigny, Anne Marie Treguier, Christian Stepanek, Eleanor O’Rourke, Chloe Mackallah, Alberto Meucci, Yevgeny Aksenov, Paul J. Durack, Nicole Feldl, Vanessa Hernaman, Céline Heuzé, Doroteaciro Iovino, Gaurav Madan, André L. Marquez, François Massonnet, Jenny Mecking, Dhrubajyoti Samanta, Patrick C. Taylor, Wan-Ling Tseng, and Martin Vancoppenolle
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3083, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3083, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Short summary
The earth system model variables needed for studies of the ocean and sea ice are prioritized and requested.
Malcolm J. Roberts, Kevin A. Reed, Qing Bao, Joseph J. Barsugli, Suzana J. Camargo, Louis-Philippe Caron, Ping Chang, Cheng-Ta Chen, Hannah M. Christensen, Gokhan Danabasoglu, Ivy Frenger, Neven S. Fučkar, Shabeh ul Hasson, Helene T. Hewitt, Huanping Huang, Daehyun Kim, Chihiro Kodama, Michael Lai, Lai-Yung Ruby Leung, Ryo Mizuta, Paulo Nobre, Pablo Ortega, Dominique Paquin, Christopher D. Roberts, Enrico Scoccimarro, Jon Seddon, Anne Marie Treguier, Chia-Ying Tu, Paul A. Ullrich, Pier Luigi Vidale, Michael F. Wehner, Colin M. Zarzycki, Bosong Zhang, Wei Zhang, and Ming Zhao
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1307–1332, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1307-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1307-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
HighResMIP2 is a model intercomparison project focusing on high-resolution global climate models, that is, those with grid spacings of 25 km or less in the atmosphere and ocean, using simulations of decades to a century in length. We are proposing an update of our simulation protocol to make the models more applicable to key questions for climate variability and hazard in present-day and future projections and to build links with other communities to provide more robust climate information.
Bjorn Stevens, Stefan Adami, Tariq Ali, Hartwig Anzt, Zafer Aslan, Sabine Attinger, Jaana Bäck, Johanna Baehr, Peter Bauer, Natacha Bernier, Bob Bishop, Hendryk Bockelmann, Sandrine Bony, Guy Brasseur, David N. Bresch, Sean Breyer, Gilbert Brunet, Pier Luigi Buttigieg, Junji Cao, Christelle Castet, Yafang Cheng, Ayantika Dey Choudhury, Deborah Coen, Susanne Crewell, Atish Dabholkar, Qing Dai, Francisco Doblas-Reyes, Dale Durran, Ayoub El Gaidi, Charlie Ewen, Eleftheria Exarchou, Veronika Eyring, Florencia Falkinhoff, David Farrell, Piers M. Forster, Ariane Frassoni, Claudia Frauen, Oliver Fuhrer, Shahzad Gani, Edwin Gerber, Debra Goldfarb, Jens Grieger, Nicolas Gruber, Wilco Hazeleger, Rolf Herken, Chris Hewitt, Torsten Hoefler, Huang-Hsiung Hsu, Daniela Jacob, Alexandra Jahn, Christian Jakob, Thomas Jung, Christopher Kadow, In-Sik Kang, Sarah Kang, Karthik Kashinath, Katharina Kleinen-von Königslöw, Daniel Klocke, Uta Kloenne, Milan Klöwer, Chihiro Kodama, Stefan Kollet, Tobias Kölling, Jenni Kontkanen, Steve Kopp, Michal Koran, Markku Kulmala, Hanna Lappalainen, Fakhria Latifi, Bryan Lawrence, June Yi Lee, Quentin Lejeun, Christian Lessig, Chao Li, Thomas Lippert, Jürg Luterbacher, Pekka Manninen, Jochem Marotzke, Satoshi Matsouoka, Charlotte Merchant, Peter Messmer, Gero Michel, Kristel Michielsen, Tomoki Miyakawa, Jens Müller, Ramsha Munir, Sandeep Narayanasetti, Ousmane Ndiaye, Carlos Nobre, Achim Oberg, Riko Oki, Tuba Özkan-Haller, Tim Palmer, Stan Posey, Andreas Prein, Odessa Primus, Mike Pritchard, Julie Pullen, Dian Putrasahan, Johannes Quaas, Krishnan Raghavan, Venkatachalam Ramaswamy, Markus Rapp, Florian Rauser, Markus Reichstein, Aromar Revi, Sonakshi Saluja, Masaki Satoh, Vera Schemann, Sebastian Schemm, Christina Schnadt Poberaj, Thomas Schulthess, Cath Senior, Jagadish Shukla, Manmeet Singh, Julia Slingo, Adam Sobel, Silvina Solman, Jenna Spitzer, Philip Stier, Thomas Stocker, Sarah Strock, Hang Su, Petteri Taalas, John Taylor, Susann Tegtmeier, Georg Teutsch, Adrian Tompkins, Uwe Ulbrich, Pier-Luigi Vidale, Chien-Ming Wu, Hao Xu, Najibullah Zaki, Laure Zanna, Tianjun Zhou, and Florian Ziemen
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 2113–2122, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-2113-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-2113-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
To manage Earth in the Anthropocene, new tools, new institutions, and new forms of international cooperation will be required. Earth Virtualization Engines is proposed as an international federation of centers of excellence to empower all people to respond to the immense and urgent challenges posed by climate change.
Enner Alcântara, José A. Marengo, José Mantovani, Luciana R. Londe, Rachel Lau Yu San, Edward Park, Yunung Nina Lin, Jingyu Wang, Tatiana Mendes, Ana Paula Cunha, Luana Pampuch, Marcelo Seluchi, Silvio Simões, Luz Adriana Cuartas, Demerval Goncalves, Klécia Massi, Regina Alvalá, Osvaldo Moraes, Carlos Souza Filho, Rodolfo Mendes, and Carlos Nobre
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 1157–1175, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-1157-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-1157-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The municipality of Petrópolis (approximately 305 687 inhabitants) is nestled in the mountains 68 km outside the city of Rio de Janeiro. On 15 February 2022, the city of Petrópolis in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, received an unusually high volume of rain within 3 h (258 mm). This resulted in flash floods and subsequent landslides that caused 231 fatalities, the deadliest landslide disaster recorded in Petrópolis. This work shows how the disaster was triggered.
Layrson J. M. Gonçalves, Simone M. S. C. Coelho, Paulo Y. Kubota, and Dayana C. Souza
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 15509–15526, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-15509-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-15509-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This research aims to study the environmental conditions that are favorable and not favorable to cloud formation, in this case specifically for the Amazon region. The results found in this research will be used to improve the representation of clouds in numerical models that are used in weather and climate prediction. In general, it is expected that with better knowledge regarding the cloud–radiation interaction, it is possible to make a better forecast of weather and climate.
Yongkang Xue, Tandong Yao, Aaron A. Boone, Ismaila Diallo, Ye Liu, Xubin Zeng, William K. M. Lau, Shiori Sugimoto, Qi Tang, Xiaoduo Pan, Peter J. van Oevelen, Daniel Klocke, Myung-Seo Koo, Tomonori Sato, Zhaohui Lin, Yuhei Takaya, Constantin Ardilouze, Stefano Materia, Subodh K. Saha, Retish Senan, Tetsu Nakamura, Hailan Wang, Jing Yang, Hongliang Zhang, Mei Zhao, Xin-Zhong Liang, J. David Neelin, Frederic Vitart, Xin Li, Ping Zhao, Chunxiang Shi, Weidong Guo, Jianping Tang, Miao Yu, Yun Qian, Samuel S. P. Shen, Yang Zhang, Kun Yang, Ruby Leung, Yuan Qiu, Daniele Peano, Xin Qi, Yanling Zhan, Michael A. Brunke, Sin Chan Chou, Michael Ek, Tianyi Fan, Hong Guan, Hai Lin, Shunlin Liang, Helin Wei, Shaocheng Xie, Haoran Xu, Weiping Li, Xueli Shi, Paulo Nobre, Yan Pan, Yi Qin, Jeff Dozier, Craig R. Ferguson, Gianpaolo Balsamo, Qing Bao, Jinming Feng, Jinkyu Hong, Songyou Hong, Huilin Huang, Duoying Ji, Zhenming Ji, Shichang Kang, Yanluan Lin, Weiguang Liu, Ryan Muncaster, Patricia de Rosnay, Hiroshi G. Takahashi, Guiling Wang, Shuyu Wang, Weicai Wang, Xu Zhou, and Yuejian Zhu
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 4465–4494, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-4465-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-4465-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The subseasonal prediction of extreme hydroclimate events such as droughts/floods has remained stubbornly low for years. This paper presents a new international initiative which, for the first time, introduces spring land surface temperature anomalies over high mountains to improve precipitation prediction through remote effects of land–atmosphere interactions. More than 40 institutions worldwide are participating in this effort. The experimental protocol and preliminary results are presented.
Fernanda Casagrande, Ronald Buss de Souza, Paulo Nobre, and Andre Lanfer Marquez
Ann. Geophys., 38, 1123–1138, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-1123-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-1123-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Polar amplification is possibly one of the most important sensitive indicators of climate change. Our results showed that the polar regions are much more vulnerable to large warming due to an increase in atmospheric CO2 forcing than the rest of the world, particularly during the cold season. Despite the asymmetry in warming between the Arctic and Antarctic, both poles show systematic polar amplification in all climate models.
Vinicius Buscioli Capistrano, Paulo Nobre, Sandro F. Veiga, Renata Tedeschi, Josiane Silva, Marcus Bottino, Manoel Baptista da Silva Jr., Otacílio Leandro Menezes Neto, Silvio Nilo Figueroa, José Paulo Bonatti, Paulo Yoshio Kubota, Julio Pablo Reyes Fernandez, Emanuel Giarolla, Jessica Vial, and Carlos A. Nobre
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 2277–2296, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2277-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2277-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
This work represents the product of our recent efforts to develop a Brazilian climate model and helps address some scientific issues on the frontier of knowledge (e.g., cloud feedback studies). The BESM results show climate sensitivity and thermodynamical responses similar to a CMIP5 ensemble. More than that, BESM has the objective of being an additional climate model with the ability to reproduce changes that are physically understood in order to study the global climate system.
Mabel Costa Calim, Paulo Nobre, Peter Oke, Andreas Schiller, Leo San Pedro Siqueira, and Guilherme Pimenta Castelão
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2018-5, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2018-5, 2018
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Short summary
A new tool inspired on tides is introduced. The Spectral Taylor Diagram designed for evaluating and monitoring models performance in frequency domain calculates the degree of correspondence between simulated and observed fields for a given frequency (or a band of frequencies). It's a powerful tool to detect co-oscillating patterns in multi scale analysis, without using filtering techniques.
Related subject area
Climate and Earth system modeling
SASIEv.1: a framework for seasonal and multi-centennial Arctic sea ice emulation
COSP-RTTOV-1.0: flexible radiation diagnostics to enable new science applications in model evaluation, climate change detection, and satellite mission design
Assessing modifications to the Abdul-Razzak and Ghan aerosol activation parameterization (version ARG2000) to improve simulated aerosol–cloud radiative effects in the UK Met Office Unified Model (UM version 13.0)
Correction of sea surface biases in the NEMO ocean general circulation model using neural networks
Representing lateral groundwater flow from land to river in Earth system models
FINAM is not a model (v1.0): a new Python-based model coupling framework
The Detection and Attribution Model Intercomparison Project (DAMIP v2.0) contribution to CMIP7
Enhancing winter climate simulations of the Great Lakes: insights from a new coupled lake–ice–atmosphere (CLIAv1) system on the importance of integrating 3D hydrodynamics with a regional climate model
Modelling emission and transport of key components of primary marine organic aerosol using the global aerosol–climate model ECHAM6.3–HAM2.3
Assessing the climate impact of an improved volcanic sulfate aerosol representation in E3SM
Advanced climate model evaluation with ESMValTool v2.11.0 using parallel, out-of-core, and distributed computing
ICON-HAM-lite 1.0: simulating the Earth system with interactive aerosols at kilometer scales
Process-based modeling framework for sustainable irrigation management at the regional scale: integrating rice production, water use, and greenhouse gas emissions
Implementing deep soil and dynamic root uptake in Noah-MP (v4.5): impact on Amazon dry-season transpiration
Reducing time and computing costs in EC-Earth: an automatic load-balancing approach for coupled Earth system models
FLAME 1.0: a novel approach for modelling burned area in the Brazilian biomes using the maximum entropy concept
SURFER v3.0: a fast model with ice sheet tipping points and carbon cycle feedbacks for short- and long-term climate scenarios
NMH-CS 3.0: a C# programming language and Windows-system-based ecohydrological model derived from Noah-MP
A method for quantifying uncertainty in spatially interpolated meteorological data with application to daily maximum air temperature
Baseline Climate Variables for Earth System Modelling
PaleoSTeHM v1.0: a modern, scalable spatiotemporal hierarchical modeling framework for paleo-environmental data
The Tropical Basin Interaction Model Intercomparison Project (TBIMIP)
ZEMBA v1.0: an energy and moisture balance climate model to investigate Quaternary climate
Development and evaluation of a new 4DEnVar-based weakly coupled ocean data assimilation system in E3SMv2
TemDeep: a self-supervised framework for temporal downscaling of atmospheric fields at arbitrary time resolutions
The ensemble consistency test: from CESM to MPAS and beyond
Linear Meta-Model optimization for regional climate models (LiMMo version 1.0)
An example of how data quality hinders progress: translating the latest findings on the regulation of leaf senescence timing in trees into the DP3 model (v1.0)
Presentation, calibration and testing of the DCESS II Earth system model of intermediate complexity (version 1.0)
Synthesizing global carbon–nitrogen coupling effects – the MAGICC coupled carbon–nitrogen cycle model v1.0
Historical trends and controlling factors of isoprene emissions in CMIP6 Earth system models
Investigating carbon and nitrogen conservation in reported CMIP6 Earth system model data
OpenBench: a land models evaluation system
From weather data to river runoff: using spatiotemporal convolutional networks for discharge forecasting
A Fortran–Python interface for integrating machine learning parameterization into earth system models
ROCKE-3D 2.0: An updated general circulation model for simulating the climates of rocky planets
A rapid-application emissions-to-impacts tool for scenario assessment: Probabilistic Regional Impacts from Model patterns and Emissions (PRIME)
The sensitivity of EC-Earth3 decadal predictions to the choice of volcanic forcing dataset: Insights for the next major eruption
A first calibration of the JULES-crop version 7.4 for rice using the novel O3-FACE experiment in China
The DOE E3SM version 2.1: overview and assessment of the impacts of parameterized ocean submesoscales
WRF-ELM v1.0: a regional climate model to study land–atmosphere interactions over heterogeneous land use regions
Modeling commercial-scale CO2 storage in the gas hydrate stability zone with PFLOTRAN v6.0
DiuSST: a conceptual model of diurnal warm layers for idealized atmospheric simulations with interactive sea surface temperature
High-Resolution Model Intercomparison Project phase 2 (HighResMIP2) towards CMIP7
T&C-CROP: representing mechanistic crop growth with a terrestrial biosphere model (T&C, v1.5) – model formulation and validation
An updated non-intrusive, multi-scale, and flexible coupling interface in WRF 4.6.0
Monitoring and benchmarking Earth system model simulations with ESMValTool v2.12.0
The Earth Science Box Modeling Toolkit (ESBMTK 0.14.0.11): a Python library for research and teaching
CropSuite v1.0 – a comprehensive open-source crop suitability model considering climate variability for climate impact assessment
ICON ComIn – the ICON Community Interface (ComIn version 0.1.0, with ICON version 2024.01-01)
Sian Megan Chilcott, Malte Meinshausen, and Dirk Notz
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4965–4982, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4965-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4965-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Climate models are expensive to run and often underestimate how sensitive Arctic sea ice is to climate change. To address this, we developed a simple model that emulates the response of sea ice to global warming. We find that the remaining carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions that will avoid a seasonally ice-free Arctic Ocean are lower than previous estimates of 821 Gt of CO2. Our model also provides insights into the future of winter sea ice, examining a larger ensemble than previously possible.
Jonah K. Shaw, Dustin J. Swales, Sergio DeSouza-Machado, David D. Turner, Jennifer E. Kay, and David P. Schneider
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4935–4950, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4935-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4935-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Satellites have observed Earth's emissions of infrared radiation since the 1970s. Because infrared wavelengths interact with the atmosphere in distinct ways, these observations contain information about Earth and the atmosphere. We present a tool that runs within Earth system models and produces output that can be directly compared with satellite measurements of infrared radiation. We then use this tool for climate model evaluation, climate change detection, and satellite mission design.
Pratapaditya Ghosh, Katherine J. Evans, Daniel P. Grosvenor, Hyun-Gyu Kang, Salil Mahajan, Min Xu, Wei Zhang, and Hamish Gordon
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4899–4913, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4899-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4899-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The most popular algorithm for calculating cloud droplet number concentrations in climate models is sensitive to parameters that control simulated aerosol particle number concentrations at different sizes. We recommend small modifications to functions in the algorithm to improve its performance. Implementing the changes in the UK Met Office climate model reduced average bias in simulated global droplet number concentrations, leading to more reflected solar radiation and a net cooling effect.
Andrea Storto, Sergey Frolov, Laura Slivinski, and Chunxue Yang
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4789–4804, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4789-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4789-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Inaccuracies in air–sea heat fluxes severely degrade the accuracy of ocean numerical simulations. Here, we use artificial neural networks to correct air–sea heat fluxes as a function of oceanic and atmospheric state predictors. The correction successfully improves surface and subsurface ocean temperatures beyond the training period and in prediction experiments.
Chang Liao, L. Ruby Leung, Yilin Fang, Teklu Tesfa, and Robinson Negron-Juarez
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4601–4624, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4601-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4601-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Understanding horizontal groundwater flow is important for understanding how water moves through the ground. Current climate models often simplify this process because they do not have information about the land surface that is detailed enough. Our study developed a new model that divides the land surface into hillslopes to better represent how groundwater flows. This model can help improve predictions of water availability and how it affects ecosystems.
Sebastian Müller, Martin Lange, Thomas Fischer, Sara König, Matthias Kelbling, Jeisson Javier Leal Rojas, and Stephan Thober
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4483–4498, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4483-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4483-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study presents FINAM (
FINAM is not a model), a new coupling framework written in Python to dynamically connect independently developed models. Python, as the ultimate glue language, enables the use of codes from nearly any programming language like Fortran, C++, Rust, and others. FINAM is designed to simplify the integration of various models with minimal effort, as demonstrated through various examples ranging from simple to complex systems.
Nathan P. Gillett, Isla R. Simpson, Gabi Hegerl, Reto Knutti, Dann Mitchell, Aurélien Ribes, Hideo Shiogama, Dáithí Stone, Claudia Tebaldi, Piotr Wolski, Wenxia Zhang, and Vivek K. Arora
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4399–4416, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4399-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4399-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Climate model simulations of the response to human and natural influences together, natural climate influences alone and greenhouse gases alone are key to quantifying human influence on the climate. The last set of such coordinated simulations underpinned key findings in the last Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report. Here we propose a new set of such simulations to be used in the next generation of attribution studies and to underpin the next IPCC report.
Pengfei Xue, Chenfu Huang, Yafang Zhong, Michael Notaro, Miraj B. Kayastha, Xing Zhou, Chuyan Zhao, Christa Peters-Lidard, Carlos Cruz, and Eric Kemp
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4293–4316, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4293-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4293-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study introduces a new 3D lake–ice–atmosphere coupled model that significantly improves winter climate simulations for the Great Lakes compared to traditional 1D lake model coupling. The key contribution is the identification of critical hydrodynamic processes – ice transport, heat advection, and shear-driven turbulence production – that influence lake thermal structure and ice cover and explain the superior performance of 3D lake models to their 1D counterparts.
Anisbel Leon-Marcos, Moritz Zeising, Manuela van Pinxteren, Sebastian Zeppenfeld, Astrid Bracher, Elena Barbaro, Anja Engel, Matteo Feltracco, Ina Tegen, and Bernd Heinold
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4183–4213, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4183-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4183-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study represents the primary marine organic aerosol (PMOA) emissions, focusing on their sea–atmosphere transfer. Using the FESOM2.1–REcoM3 model, concentrations of key organic biomolecules were estimated and integrated into the ECHAM6.3–HAM2.3 aerosol–climate model. Results highlight the influence of marine biological activity and surface winds on PMOA emissions, with reasonably good agreement with observations improving aerosol representation in the southern oceans.
Ziming Ke, Qi Tang, Jean-Christophe Golaz, Xiaohong Liu, and Hailong Wang
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4137–4153, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4137-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4137-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study assesses volcanic aerosol representation in E3SM (Energy Exascale Earth System Model), showing that an emission-based approach moderately improves temperature variability and cloud responses compared to a prescribed forcing approach, yet significant bias persists.
Manuel Schlund, Bouwe Andela, Jörg Benke, Ruth Comer, Birgit Hassler, Emma Hogan, Peter Kalverla, Axel Lauer, Bill Little, Saskia Loosveldt Tomas, Francesco Nattino, Patrick Peglar, Valeriu Predoi, Stef Smeets, Stephen Worsley, Martin Yeo, and Klaus Zimmermann
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4009–4021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4009-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4009-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The Earth System Model Evaluation Tool (ESMValTool) is a community diagnostics and performance metrics tool for the evaluation of Earth system models. Here, we describe recent significant improvements of ESMValTool’s computational efficiency including parallel, out-of-core, and distributed computing. Evaluations with the enhanced version of ESMValTool are faster, use less computational resources, and can handle input data larger than the available memory.
Philipp Weiss, Ross Herbert, and Philip Stier
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 3877–3894, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3877-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3877-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Aerosols strongly influence Earth's climate as they interact with radiation and clouds. New Earth system models run at resolutions of a few kilometers. To simulate the Earth system with interactive aerosols, we developed a new aerosol module. It represents aerosols as an ensemble of lognormal modes with given sizes and compositions. We present a year-long simulation with four modes at a resolution of 5 km. It captures key processes like the formation of dust storms in the Sahara.
Yan Bo, Hao Liang, Tao Li, and Feng Zhou
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 3799–3817, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3799-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3799-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study proposed an advancing framework for modeling regional rice production, water use, and greenhouse gas emissions. The framework integrated a process-based soil-crop model with vital physiological effects, a novel model upscaling method, and the NSGA-II multi-objective optimization algorithm at a parallel computing platform. The framework provides a valuable tool for multi-objective optimization of rice irrigation schemes at a large scale.
Carolina A. Bieri, Francina Dominguez, Gonzalo Miguez-Macho, and Ying Fan
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 3755–3779, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3755-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3755-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Access to deep moisture below the Earth's surface is important for vegetation in areas of the Amazon where there is little precipitation for part of the year. Most existing numerical models of the Earth system do not adequately capture where and when deep root water uptake occurs. We address this by adding deep soil layers and a root water uptake feature to an existing model. Out modifications lead to increased dry-month transpiration and improved simulation of the annual transpiration cycle.
Sergi Palomas, Mario C. Acosta, Gladys Utrera, and Etienne Tourigny
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 3661–3679, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3661-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3661-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We present an automatic tool that optimizes resource distribution in coupled climate models, enhancing speed and reducing computational costs without requiring expert knowledge. Users can set energy/time criteria or limit resource usage. Tested on various European Community Earth System Model (EC-Earth) configurations and high-performance computing (HPC) platforms, it achieved up to 34 % faster simulations with fewer resources.
Maria Lucia Ferreira Barbosa, Douglas I. Kelley, Chantelle A. Burton, Igor J. M. Ferreira, Renata Moura da Veiga, Anna Bradley, Paulo Guilherme Molin, and Liana O. Anderson
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 3533–3557, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3533-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3533-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
As fire seasons in Brazil become increasingly severe, confidently understanding the factors driving fires is more critical than ever. To address this challenge, we developed FLAME (Fire Landscape Analysis using Maximum Entropy), a new model designed to predict fires and to analyse the spatial influence of both environmental and human factors while accounting for uncertainties. By adapting the model to different regions, we can enhance fire management strategies, making FLAME a powerful tool for protecting landscapes in Brazil and beyond.
Victor Couplet, Marina Martínez Montero, and Michel Crucifix
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 3081–3129, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3081-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3081-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We present SURFER v3.0, a simple climate model designed to estimate the impact of CO2 and CH4 emissions on global temperatures, sea levels, and ocean pH. We added new carbon cycle processes and calibrated the model to observations and results from more complex models, enabling use over timescales ranging from decades to millions of years. SURFER v3.0 is fast, transparent, and easy to use, making it an ideal tool for policy assessments and suitable for educational purposes.
Yong-He Liu and Zong-Liang Yang
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 3157–3174, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3157-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3157-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
NMH-CS 3.0 is a C#-based ecohydrological model reconstructed from the WRF-Hydro/Noah-MP model by translating the Fortran code of WRF-Hydro 3.0 and integrating a parallel river routing module. It enables efficient execution on multi-core personal computers. Simulations in the Yellow River basin demonstrate its consistency with WRF-Hydro outputs, providing a reliable alternative to the original Noah-MP model.
Conor T. Doherty, Weile Wang, Hirofumi Hashimoto, and Ian G. Brosnan
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 3003–3016, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3003-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3003-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We present, analyze, and validate a methodology for quantifying uncertainty in gridded meteorological data products produced by spatial interpolation. In a validation case study using daily maximum near-surface air temperature (Tmax), the method works well and produces predictive distributions with closely matching theoretical versus actual coverage levels. Application of the method reveals that the magnitude of uncertainty in interpolated Tmax varies significantly in both space and time.
Martin Juckes, Karl E. Taylor, Fabrizio Antonio, David Brayshaw, Carlo Buontempo, Jian Cao, Paul J. Durack, Michio Kawamiya, Hyungjun Kim, Tomas Lovato, Chloe Mackallah, Matthew Mizielinski, Alessandra Nuzzo, Martina Stockhause, Daniele Visioni, Jeremy Walton, Briony Turner, Eleanor O'Rourke, and Beth Dingley
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2639–2663, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2639-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2639-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The Baseline Climate Variables for Earth System Modelling (ESM-BCVs) are defined as a list of 135 variables which have high utility for the evaluation and exploitation of climate simulations. The list reflects the most frequently used variables from Earth system models based on an assessment of data publication and download records from the largest archive of global climate projects.
Yucheng Lin, Robert E. Kopp, Alexander Reedy, Matteo Turilli, Shantenu Jha, and Erica L. Ashe
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2609–2637, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2609-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2609-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
PaleoSTeHM v1.0 is a state-of-the-art framework designed to reconstruct past environmental conditions using geological data. Built on modern machine learning techniques, it efficiently handles the sparse and noisy nature of paleo-records, allowing scientists to make accurate and scalable inferences about past environmental change. By using flexible statistical models, PaleoSTeHM separates different sources of uncertainty, improving the precision of historical climate reconstructions.
Ingo Richter, Ping Chang, Ping-Gin Chiu, Gokhan Danabasoglu, Takeshi Doi, Dietmar Dommenget, Guillaume Gastineau, Zoe E. Gillett, Aixue Hu, Takahito Kataoka, Noel S. Keenlyside, Fred Kucharski, Yuko M. Okumura, Wonsun Park, Malte F. Stuecker, Andréa S. Taschetto, Chunzai Wang, Stephen G. Yeager, and Sang-Wook Yeh
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2587–2608, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2587-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2587-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Tropical ocean basins influence each other through multiple pathways and mechanisms, referred to here as tropical basin interaction (TBI). Many researchers have examined TBI using comprehensive climate models but have obtained conflicting results. This may be partly due to differences in experiment protocols and partly due to systematic model errors. The Tropical Basin Interaction Model Intercomparison Project (TBIMIP) aims to address this problem by designing a set of TBI experiments that will be performed by multiple models.
Daniel F. J. Gunning, Kerim H. Nisancioglu, Emilie Capron, and Roderik S. W. van de Wal
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2479–2508, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2479-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2479-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This work documents the first results from ZEMBA: an energy balance model of the climate system. The model is a computationally efficient tool designed to study the response of climate to changes in the Earth's orbit. We demonstrate that ZEMBA reproduces many features of the Earth's climate for both the pre-industrial period and the Earth's most recent cold extreme – the Last Glacial Maximum. We intend to develop ZEMBA further and investigate the glacial cycles of the last 2.5 million years.
Pengfei Shi, L. Ruby Leung, and Bin Wang
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2443–2460, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2443-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2443-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Improving climate predictions has significant socio-economic impacts. In this study, we develop and apply a new weakly coupled ocean data assimilation (WCODA) system to a coupled climate model. The WCODA system improves simulations of ocean temperature and salinity across many global regions. This system is meant to advance our understanding of the ocean's role in climate predictability.
Liwen Wang, Qian Li, Qi Lv, Xuan Peng, and Wei You
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2427–2442, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2427-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2427-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Our research presents a novel deep learning approach called "TemDeep" for downscaling atmospheric variables at arbitrary time resolutions based on temporal coherence. Results show that our method can accurately recover evolution details superior to other methods, reaching 53.7 % in the restoration rate. Our findings are important for advancing weather forecasting models and enabling more precise and reliable predictions to support disaster preparedness, agriculture, and sustainable development.
Teo Price-Broncucia, Allison Baker, Dorit Hammerling, Michael Duda, and Rebecca Morrison
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2349–2372, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2349-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2349-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The ensemble consistency test (ECT) and its ultrafast variant (UF-ECT) have become powerful tools in the development community for the identification of unwanted changes in the Community Earth System Model (CESM). We develop a generalized setup framework to enable easy adoption of the ECT approach for other model developers and communities. This framework specifies test parameters to accurately characterize model variability and balance test sensitivity and computational cost.
Sergei Petrov, Andreas Will, and Beate Geyer
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-710, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-710, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study introduces a new method that helps improve the accuracy of climate models by automatically selecting the best parameters to match real-world observations. Instead of manually adjusting many parameters, the method uses a mathematical tool to find the most appropriate settings for the model. It can be especially helpful for researchers who introduce new physical parameters into climate models to assess their impact on model results and optimize them along with the old ones.
Michael Meier, Christof Bigler, and Isabelle Chuine
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-460, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-460, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Formulated according to the leaf development process, the DP3 model of leaf coloring considerably contrasts previous models and allows to set up new hypotheses, e.g. on aging versus stress caused color changes. The DP3 model was as accurate as previous models and a comparison to the constant simulation of the mean date of leaf coloring indicated that noisy leaf coloring data forced the models to resort to this mean, which hinders model evaluation.
Esteban Fernández Villanueva and Gary Shaffer
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2161–2192, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2161-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2161-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We describe, calibrate and test the Danish Center for Earth System Science (DCESS) II model, a new, broad, adaptable and fast Earth system model. DCESS II is designed for global simulations over timescales of years to millions of years using limited computer resources like a personal computer. With its flexibility and comprehensive treatment of the global carbon cycle, DCESS II is a useful, computationally friendly tool for simulations of past climates as well as for future Earth system projections.
Gang Tang, Zebedee Nicholls, Alexander Norton, Sönke Zaehle, and Malte Meinshausen
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2193–2230, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2193-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2193-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We studied carbon–nitrogen coupling in Earth system models by developing a global carbon–nitrogen cycle model (CNit v1.0) within the widely used emulator MAGICC. CNit effectively reproduced the global carbon–nitrogen cycle dynamics observed in complex models. Our results show persistent nitrogen limitations on plant growth (net primary production) from 1850 to 2100, suggesting that nitrogen deficiency may constrain future land carbon sequestration.
Ngoc Thi Nhu Do, Kengo Sudo, Akihiko Ito, Louisa K. Emmons, Vaishali Naik, Kostas Tsigaridis, Øyvind Seland, Gerd A. Folberth, and Douglas I. Kelley
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2079–2109, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2079-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2079-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Understanding historical isoprene emission changes is important for predicting future climate, but trends and their controlling factors remain uncertain. This study shows that long-term isoprene trends vary among Earth system models mainly due to partially incorporating CO2 effects and land cover changes rather than to climate. Future models that refine these factors’ effects on isoprene emissions, along with long-term observations, are essential for better understanding plant–climate interactions.
Gang Tang, Zebedee Nicholls, Chris Jones, Thomas Gasser, Alexander Norton, Tilo Ziehn, Alejandro Romero-Prieto, and Malte Meinshausen
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2111–2136, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2111-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2111-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We analyzed carbon and nitrogen mass conservation in data from various Earth system models. Our findings reveal significant discrepancies between flux and pool size data, where cumulative imbalances can reach hundreds of gigatons of carbon or nitrogen. These imbalances appear primarily due to missing or inconsistently reported fluxes – especially for land-use and fire emissions. To enhance data quality, we recommend that future climate data protocols address this issue at the reporting stage.
Zhongwang Wei, Qingchen Xu, Fan Bai, Xionghui Xu, Zixin Wei, Wenzong Dong, Hongbin Liang, Nan Wei, Xingjie Lu, Lu Li, Shupeng Zhang, Hua Yuan, Laibo Liu, and Yongjiu Dai
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1380, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1380, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Land surface models are used for simulating earth's surface interacts with the atmosphere. As models grow more complex and detailed, researchers need better tools to evaluate their performance. OpenBench, a new software system that makes evaluation process more comprehensive and efficient. It stands out by incorporating various factors and working with data at any scale which enabling scientists to incorporate new types of models and measurements as our understanding of Earth’s systems evolves.
Florian Börgel, Sven Karsten, Karoline Rummel, and Ulf Gräwe
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2005–2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2005-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2005-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Forecasting river runoff, which is crucial for managing water resources and understanding climate impacts, can be challenging. This study introduces a new method using convolutional long short-term memory (ConvLSTM) networks, a machine learning model that processes spatial and temporal data. Focusing on the Baltic Sea region, our model uses weather data as input to predict daily river runoff for 97 rivers.
Tao Zhang, Cyril Morcrette, Meng Zhang, Wuyin Lin, Shaocheng Xie, Ye Liu, Kwinten Van Weverberg, and Joana Rodrigues
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1917–1928, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1917-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1917-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Earth system models (ESMs) struggle with the uncertainties associated with parameterizing subgrid physics. Machine learning (ML) algorithms offer a solution by learning the important relationships and features from high-resolution models. To incorporate ML parameterizations into ESMs, we develop a Fortran–Python interface that allows for calling Python functions within Fortran-based ESMs. Through two case studies, this interface demonstrates its feasibility, modularity, and effectiveness.
Kostas Tsigaridis, Andrew S. Ackerman, Igor Aleinov, Mark A. Chandler, Thomas L. Clune, Christopher M. Colose, Anthony D. Del Genio, Maxwell Kelley, Nancy Y. Kiang, Anthony Leboissetier, Jan P. Perlwitz, Reto A. Ruedy, Gary L. Russell, Linda E. Sohl, Michael J. Way, and Eric T. Wolf
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-925, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-925, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We present the second generation of ROCKE-3D, a generalized 3-dimensional model for use in Solar System and exoplanetary simulations of rocky planet climates. We quantify how the different component choices affect model results, and discuss strengths and limitations of using each component, together with how one can select which component to use. ROCKE-3D is publicly available and tutorial sessions are available for the community, greatly facilitating its use by any interested group.
Camilla Mathison, Eleanor J. Burke, Gregory Munday, Chris D. Jones, Chris J. Smith, Norman J. Steinert, Andy J. Wiltshire, Chris Huntingford, Eszter Kovacs, Laila K. Gohar, Rebecca M. Varney, and Douglas McNeall
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1785–1808, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1785-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1785-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We present PRIME (Probabilistic Regional Impacts from Model patterns and Emissions), which is designed to take new emissions scenarios and rapidly provide regional impact information. PRIME allows large ensembles to be run on multi-centennial timescales, including the analysis of many important variables for impact assessments. Our evaluation shows that PRIME reproduces the climate response for known scenarios, providing confidence in using PRIME for novel scenarios.
Roberto Bilbao, Thomas J. Aubry, Matthew Toohey, and Pablo Ortega
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-609, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-609, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Large volcanic eruptions are unpredictable and can have significant climatic impacts. If one occurs, operational decadal forecasts will become invalid and must be rerun including the volcanic forcing. By analyzing the climate response in EC-Earth3 retrospective predictions, we show that idealised forcings produced with two simple models could be used in operational decadal forecasts to account for the radiative impacts of the next major volcanic eruption.
Beiyao Xu, Steven Dobbie, Huiyi Yang, Lianxin Yang, Yu Jiang, Andrew Challinor, Karina Williams, Yunxia Wang, and Tijian Wang
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-4077, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-4077, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Ozone (O3) pollution harms rice production and threatens food security. To understand these impacts, we calibrated a crop model using unique data from experiments where rice was grown in open fields under controlled O3 exposure (free air). This is the first time such data has been used to improve a model’s ability to predict how rice responds to O3 pollution. Our work provides a more accurate tool to study O3’s effects and guide strategies to protect agriculture.
Katherine M. Smith, Alice M. Barthel, LeAnn M. Conlon, Luke P. Van Roekel, Anthony Bartoletti, Jean-Christophe Golaz, Chengzhu Zhang, Carolyn Branecky Begeman, James J. Benedict, Gautam Bisht, Yan Feng, Walter Hannah, Bryce E. Harrop, Nicole Jeffery, Wuyin Lin, Po-Lun Ma, Mathew E. Maltrud, Mark R. Petersen, Balwinder Singh, Qi Tang, Teklu Tesfa, Jonathan D. Wolfe, Shaocheng Xie, Xue Zheng, Karthik Balaguru, Oluwayemi Garuba, Peter Gleckler, Aixue Hu, Jiwoo Lee, Ben Moore-Maley, and Ana C. Ordoñez
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1613–1633, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1613-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1613-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Version 2.1 of the U.S. Department of Energy's Energy Exascale Earth System Model (E3SM) adds the Fox-Kemper et al. (2011) mixed-layer eddy parameterization, which restratifies the ocean surface layer through an overturning streamfunction. Results include surface layer bias reduction in temperature, salinity, and sea ice extent in the North Atlantic; a small strengthening of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation; and improvements to many atmospheric climatological variables.
Huilin Huang, Yun Qian, Gautam Bisht, Jiali Wang, Tirthankar Chakraborty, Dalei Hao, Jianfeng Li, Travis Thurber, Balwinder Singh, Zhao Yang, Ye Liu, Pengfei Xue, William J. Sacks, Ethan Coon, and Robert Hetland
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1427–1443, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1427-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1427-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We integrate the E3SM Land Model (ELM) with the WRF model through the Lightweight Infrastructure for Land Atmosphere Coupling (LILAC) Earth System Modeling Framework (ESMF). This framework includes a top-level driver, LILAC, for variable communication between WRF and ELM and ESMF caps for ELM initialization, execution, and finalization. The LILAC–ESMF framework maintains the integrity of the ELM's source code structure and facilitates the transfer of future ELM model developments to WRF-ELM.
Michael Nole, Jonah Bartrand, Fawz Naim, and Glenn Hammond
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1413–1425, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1413-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1413-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Safe carbon dioxide (CO2) storage is likely to be critical for mitigating some of the most severe effects of climate change. We present a simulation framework for modeling CO2 storage beneath the seafloor, where CO2 can form a solid. This can aid in permanent CO2 storage for long periods of time. Our models show what a commercial-scale CO2 injection would look like in a marine environment. We discuss what would need to be considered when designing a subsea CO2 injection.
Reyk Börner, Jan O. Haerter, and Romain Fiévet
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1333–1356, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1333-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1333-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The daily cycle of sea surface temperature (SST) impacts clouds above the ocean and could influence the clustering of thunderstorms linked to extreme rainfall and hurricanes. However, daily SST variability is often poorly represented in modeling studies of how clouds cluster. We present a simple, wind-responsive model of upper-ocean temperature for use in atmospheric simulations. Evaluating the model against observations, we show that it performs significantly better than common slab models.
Malcolm J. Roberts, Kevin A. Reed, Qing Bao, Joseph J. Barsugli, Suzana J. Camargo, Louis-Philippe Caron, Ping Chang, Cheng-Ta Chen, Hannah M. Christensen, Gokhan Danabasoglu, Ivy Frenger, Neven S. Fučkar, Shabeh ul Hasson, Helene T. Hewitt, Huanping Huang, Daehyun Kim, Chihiro Kodama, Michael Lai, Lai-Yung Ruby Leung, Ryo Mizuta, Paulo Nobre, Pablo Ortega, Dominique Paquin, Christopher D. Roberts, Enrico Scoccimarro, Jon Seddon, Anne Marie Treguier, Chia-Ying Tu, Paul A. Ullrich, Pier Luigi Vidale, Michael F. Wehner, Colin M. Zarzycki, Bosong Zhang, Wei Zhang, and Ming Zhao
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1307–1332, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1307-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1307-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
HighResMIP2 is a model intercomparison project focusing on high-resolution global climate models, that is, those with grid spacings of 25 km or less in the atmosphere and ocean, using simulations of decades to a century in length. We are proposing an update of our simulation protocol to make the models more applicable to key questions for climate variability and hazard in present-day and future projections and to build links with other communities to provide more robust climate information.
Jordi Buckley Paules, Simone Fatichi, Bonnie Warring, and Athanasios Paschalis
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1287–1305, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1287-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1287-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We present and validate enhancements to the process-based T&C model aimed at improving its representation of crop growth and management practices. The updated model, T&C-CROP, enables applications such as analysing the hydrological and carbon storage impacts of land use transitions (e.g. conversions between crops, forests, and pastures) and optimizing irrigation and fertilization strategies in response to climate change.
Sébastien Masson, Swen Jullien, Eric Maisonnave, David Gill, Guillaume Samson, Mathieu Le Corre, and Lionel Renault
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1241–1263, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1241-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1241-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This article details a new feature we implemented in the popular regional atmospheric model WRF. This feature allows for data exchange between WRF and any other model (e.g. an ocean model) using the coupling library Ocean–Atmosphere–Sea–Ice–Soil Model Coupling Toolkit (OASIS3-MCT). This coupling interface is designed to be non-intrusive, flexible and modular. It also offers the possibility of taking into account the nested zooms used in WRF or in the models with which it is coupled.
Axel Lauer, Lisa Bock, Birgit Hassler, Patrick Jöckel, Lukas Ruhe, and Manuel Schlund
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1169–1188, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1169-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1169-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Earth system models are important tools to improve our understanding of current climate and to project climate change. Thus, it is crucial to understand possible shortcomings in the models. New features of the ESMValTool software package allow one to compare and visualize a model's performance with respect to reproducing observations in the context of other climate models in an easy and user-friendly way. We aim to help model developers assess and monitor climate simulations more efficiently.
Ulrich G. Wortmann, Tina Tsan, Mahrukh Niazi, Irene A. Ma, Ruben Navasardyan, Magnus-Roland Marun, Bernardo S. Chede, Jingwen Zhong, and Morgan Wolfe
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1155–1167, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1155-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1155-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The Earth Science Box Modeling Toolkit (ESBMTK) is a user-friendly Python library that simplifies the creation of models to study earth system processes, such as the carbon cycle and ocean chemistry. It enhances learning by emphasizing concepts over programming and is accessible to students and researchers alike. By automating complex calculations and promoting code clarity, ESBMTK accelerates model development while improving reproducibility and the usability of scientific research.
Florian Zabel, Matthias Knüttel, and Benjamin Poschlod
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1067–1087, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1067-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1067-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
CropSuite is a new open-source crop suitability model. It provides a GUI and a wide range of options, including a spatial downscaling of climate data. We apply CropSuite to 48 staple and opportunity crops at a 1 km spatial resolution in Africa. We find that climate variability significantly impacts suitable areas but also affects optimal sowing dates and multiple cropping potential. The results provide valuable information for climate impact assessments, adaptation, and land-use planning.
Kerstin Hartung, Bastian Kern, Nils-Arne Dreier, Jörn Geisbüsch, Mahnoosh Haghighatnasab, Patrick Jöckel, Astrid Kerkweg, Wilton Jaciel Loch, Florian Prill, and Daniel Rieger
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1001–1015, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1001-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1001-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The ICOsahedral Non-hydrostatic (ICON) model system Community Interface (ComIn) library supports connecting third-party modules to the ICON model. Third-party modules can range from simple diagnostic Python scripts to full chemistry models. ComIn offers a low barrier for code extensions to ICON, provides multi-language support (Fortran, C/C++, and Python), and reduces the migration effort in response to new ICON releases. This paper presents the ComIn design principles and a range of use cases.
Cited articles
Adler, R. F., Huffman, G. J., Chang, A., Ferraro, R., Xie, P.-P., Janowiak,
J., Rudolf, B., Schneider, U., Curtis, S., Bolvin, D., Gruber, A., Susskind,
J., Arkin, P., and Nelkin, E.: The Version-2 Global Precipitation Climatology
Project (GPCP) Monthly Precipitation Analysis (1979–Present), J.
Hydrometeorol., 4, 1147–1167,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1525-7541(2003)004<1147:TVGPCP>2.0.CO;2, 2003.
Ahn, M. S., Kim, D., Sperber, K. R., Kang, I. S., Maloney, E., Waliser,
D., and Hendon, H.: MJO simulation in CMIP5 climate models: MJO skill metrics
and process-oriented diagnosis, Clim. Dynam., 49, 4023–4045,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-017-3558-4, 2017.
Bentsen, M., Bethke, I., Debernard, J. B., Iversen, T., Kirkevåg, A.,
Seland, Ø., Drange, H., Roelandt, C., Seierstad, I. A., Hoose, C., and
Kristjánsson, J. E.: The Norwegian Earth System Model, NorESM1-M – Part 1:
Description and basic evaluation of the physical climate, Geosci. Model Dev.,
6, 687–720, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-687-2013, 2013.
Bottino, M. J. and Nobre, P.: Impacts of cloud cover schemes on the
Atlantic climate in the Brazilian Earth System Model – BESM-OA2.3.,
Clim. Dynam., submitted, 2019.
Buckley, M. W. and Marshall, J.: Observations, inferences, and mechanisms of
the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation: A review, Rev. Geophys., 54,
5–63, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015RG000493, 2016.
Cao, J., Wang, B., Yang, Y.-M., Ma, L., Li, J., Sun, B., Bao, Y., He, J.,
Zhou, X., and Wu, L.: The NUIST Earth System Model (NESM) version 3:
description and preliminary evaluation, Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 2975–2993,
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2975-2018, 2018.
Capistrano, V. B., Nobre, P., Tedeschi, R., Silva, J., Bottino, M., da Silva
Jr., M. B., Menezes Neto, O. L., Figueroa, S. N., Bonatti, J. P., Kubota, P.
Y., Reyes Fernandez, J. P., Giarolla, E., Vial, J., and Nobre, C. A.:
Overview of climate change in the BESM-OA2.5 climate model, Geosci. Model
Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2018-209, in review, 2018.
Carvalho, L. M. V, Jones, C., and Liebmann, B.: The South Atlantic
convergence zone: Intensity, form, persistence, and relationships with
intraseasonal to interannual activity and extreme rainfall, J. Climate, 17,
88–108, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2004)017<0088:TSACZI>2.0.CO;2, 2004.
Chang, P., Ki, L., and Li, H.: A decadal climate variation in the tropical
Atlantic Ocean from thermodynamic air-sea interactions, Nature, 385,
516–518, 1997.
Charlton-Perez, A. J., Baldwin, M. P., Birner, T., Black, R. X., Butler, A.
H., Calvo, N., Davis, N. A., Gerber, E. P., Gillett, N., Hardiman, S., Kim,
J., Krüger, K., Lee, Y. Y., Manzini, E., McDaniel, B. A., Polvani, L.,
Reichler, T., Shaw, T. A., Sigmond, M., Son, S. W., Toohey, M., Wilcox, L.,
Yoden, S., Christiansen, B., Lott, F., Shindell, D., Yukimoto, S., and
Watanabe, S.: On the lack of stratospheric dynamical variability in low-top
versions of the CMIP5 models, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 2494–2505,
https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50125, 2013.
Chaves, R. R. and Nobre, P.: Interactions between sea surface temperature
over the South Atlantic Ocean and the South Atlantic Convergence Zone,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, 1–4, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL018647, 2004.
Cheng, W., Chiang, J. C. H., and Zhang, D.: Atlantic meridional overturning
circulation (AMOC) in CMIP5 Models: RCP and historical simulations, J.
Climate, 26, 7187–7197, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00496.1, 2013.
Chiang, J. C. H. and Vimont, D. J.: Analogous Pacific and Atlantic
Meridional Modes of Tropical Atmosphere – Ocean Variability, J. Climate, 17,
4143–4158, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI4953.1, 2004.
Chou, M.-D. and Suarez, M. J.: A solar radiation parame- terization
(CLIRAD-SW) for atmospheric studies, NASA Tech. Memo NASA/TM-1999-104606, 40
pp., 1999.
Chou, S. C., Lyra, A., Mourão, C., Dereczynski, C., Pilotto, I., Gomes,
J., Bustamante, J., Tavares, P., Silva, A., Rodrigues, D., Campos, D.,
Chagas, D., Sueiro, G., Siqueira, G., Nobre, P., and Marengo, J.: Evaluation
of the Eta Simulations Nested in Three Global Climate Models, Am. J. Clim.
Chang., 3, 438–454, https://doi.org/10.4236/ajcc.2014.35039, 2014.
Compo, G. P., Whitaker, J. S., Sardeshmukh, P. D., Matsui, N., Allan, R. J.,
Yin, X., Gleason, B. E., Vose, R. S., Rutledge, G., Bessemoulin, P.,
Bronnimann, S., Brunet, M., Crouthamel, R. I., Grant, A. N., Groisman, P. Y.,
Jones, P. D., Kruk, M. C., Kruger, A. C., Marshall, G. J., Maugeri, M., Mok,
H. Y., Nordli, O., Ross, T. F., Trigo, R. M., Wang, X. L., Woodruff, S. D.,
and Worley, S. J.: The Twentieth Century Reanalysis Project, Q. J. Roy.
Meteor. Soc., 137, 1–28, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.776, 2011.
Delworth, T. L., Zeng, F., Vecchi, G. A., Yang, X., Zhang, L., and Zhang, R.:
The North Atlantic Oscillation as a driver of rapid climate change in the
Northern Hemisphere, Nat. Geosci., 9, 509–512, https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2738, 2016.
de Oliveira Vieira, S., Satyamurty, P., and Andreoli, R. V.: On the South
Atlantic Convergence Zone affecting southern Amazonia in austral summer,
Atmos. Sci. Lett., 14, 1–6, https://doi.org/10.1002/asl2.401, 2013.
Dijkstra, H. A.: The ENSO phenomenon: theory and mechanisms, Adv. Geosci., 6,
3–15, https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-6-3-2006, 2006.
Ferrier, B. S., Jin, Y., Lin, Y., Black, T., Rogers, E., and DiMego, G.:
Implementation of a 527 new grid-scale cloud and precipitation scheme in the
NCEP Eta model, American Meteor Society, 19th Conf. on weather Analysis and Forecasting/15th Conf. on Numerical Weather Prediction, 280–283,
2002.
Figueroa, S. N., Bonatti, J. P., Kubota, P. Y., Grell, G. A., Morrison, H.,
Barros, S. R. M., Fernandez, J. P. R., Ramirez, E., Capistrano, V. B., Alvim,
D. S., Enoré, D. P., Diniz, F. L. R., Barbosa, H. M. J., Mendes, C. L.,
and Panetta, J.: The Brazilian Global Atmospheric Model (BAM): Performance
for Tropical Rainfall Forecasting and Sensitivity to Convective Scheme and
Horizontal Resolution, Weather Forecast., 31, 1547–1572,
https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-16-0062.1, 2016.
Flato, G. M.: Earth system models: An overview, Wires
Clim. Change, 2, 783–800, https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.148, 2011.
Flato, G., Marotzke, J., Abiodun, B., Braconnot, P., Chou, S. C., Collins, W.,
Cox, P., Driouech, F., Emori, S., Eyring, V., Forest, C., Gleckler, P.,
Guilyardi, E., Jakob, C., Kattsov, V., Reason, C., and Rummukainen, M.:
Evaluation of Climate Models. In: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science
Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Stocker, T. F., Qin,
D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S. K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia,
Y., Bex, V., and Midgley, P. M., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,
United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 2013.
Gent, P. R., Danabasoglu, G., Donner, L. J., Holland, M. M., Hunke, E. C.,
Jayne, S. R., Lawrence, D. M., Neale, R. B., Rasch, P. J., Vertenstein, M.,
Worley, P. H., Yang, Z.-L., and Zhang, M.: The Community Climate System Model
Version 4, J. Climate, 24, 4973–4991, https://doi.org/10.1175/2011JCLI4083.1, 2011.
Giarolla, E., Siqueira, L. S. P., Bottino, M. J., Malagutti, M., Capistrano,
V. B., and Nobre, P.: Equatorial Atlantic Ocean dynamics in a coupled ocean
atmosphere model simulation, Ocean Dynam., 65, 831–843,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-015-0836-8, 2015.
Gong, D. and Wang, S.: Definition of Antarctic Oscillation Index, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 26, 459–462, https://doi.org/10.1029/1999GL900003, 1999.
Grell, G. and Dévényi, D. A.: A generalized approach to
parameterizing convection combining ensemble and data assimilation
techniques, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29, 10–13, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL015311, 2002.
Griffies, S. M.: Elements of MOM4p1. NOAA/Geophysical Fluid Dynamics
Laboratory Ocean Group Tech. Rep. 6, 444 pp., 2009.
Grimm, A. M.: The El Niño impact on the summer monsoon in Brazil:
Regional processes versus remote influences, J. Climate, 16, 263–280,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2003)016<0263:TENIOT>2.0.CO;2, 2003.
Harshvardhan, Davies, R., Randall, D. A., and Corsetti, T. G.: A fast
radiation parameterization for atmospheric circulation models, J. Geophys.
Res., 92, 1009–1016, https://doi.org/10.1029/JD092iD01p01009, 1987.
Hu, Z. Z. and Huang, B.: Interferential impact of ENSO and PDO on dry and
wet conditions in the U.S. great plains, J. Climate, 22, 6047–6065,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JCLI2798.1, 2009.
Huang, B., Banzon, V. F., Freeman, E., Lawrimore, J., Liu, W., Peterson, T.
C., Smith, T. M., Thorne, P. W., Woodruff, S. D., and Zhang, H. M.: Extended
reconstructed sea surface temperature version 4 (ERSST.v4). Part I: Upgrades
and intercomparisons, J. Climate, 28, 911–930,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00006.1, 2015.
Huffman, G. J., Adler, R. F., Bolvin, D. T., and Gu, G.: Improving the global
precipitation record: GPCP Version 2.1, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L17808,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL040000, 2009.
Hurrell, J. W. and Deser, C.: North Atlantic climate variability: The role
of the North Atlantic Oscillation, J. Marine Syst., 78, 28–41,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2008.11.026, 2009.
Hurrell, J. W., Kushnir, Y., Otterson, G., and Visbeck, M.: An Overview of
the North Atlantic Oscillation, The North Atlantic Oscillation: Climatic
Significance and Environmental Impact, Geophysical Monograph Series, 134,
263, https://doi.org/10.1029/GM134, 2003.
Hwang, Y.-T. and Frierson, D. M. W.: Link between the double-Intertropical
Convergence Zone problem and cloud biases over the Southern Ocean, P. Natl.
Acad. Sci. USA, 110, 4935–4940, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1213302110, 2013.
Ji, D., Wang, L., Feng, J., Wu, Q., Cheng, H., Zhang, Q., Yang, J., Dong, W.,
Dai, Y., Gong, D., Zhang, R.-H., Wang, X., Liu, J., Moore, J. C., Chen, D.,
and Zhou, M.: Description and basic evaluation of Beijing Normal University
Earth System Model (BNU-ESM) version 1, Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 2039–2064,
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-2039-2014, 2014.
Jiménez, P. A., Dudhia, J., González-Rouco, J. F., Navarro, J.,
Montávez, J. P., and García-Bustamante, E.: A Revised Scheme for the
WRF Surface Layer Formulation, Mon. Weather Rev., 140, 898–918,
https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-11-00056.1, 2012.
Jones, C. and Carvalho, L. M. V: Active and break phases in the South
American monsoon system, J. Climate, 15, 905–914,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2002)015<0905:AABPIT>2.0.CO;2, 2002.
Karoly, D. J.: Southern Hemisphere Circulation Features Associated with
El-Nino-Southern Oscillation Events, J. Climate, 2, 1239–1252,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1989)002<1239:SHCFAW>2.0.CO;2, 1989.
Kidson, J. W.: Interannual Variations in the Southern Hemisphere
Circulation, J. Climate, 1, 939–953,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1988)001<1177:IVITSH>2.0.CO;2, 1988.
Kim, D., Sperber, K., Stern, W., Waliser, D., Kang, I. S., Maloney, E.,
Wang, W., Weickmann, K., Benedict, J., Khairoutdinov, M., Lee, M. I., Neale,
R., Suarez, M., Thayer-Calder, K., and Zhang, G.: Application of MJO
simulation diagnostics to climate models, J. Climate, 22, 6413–6436,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JCLI3063.1, 2009.
Krishnamurthy, L. and Krishnamurthy, V.: Indian monsoon' s relation with the
decadal part of PDO in observations and NCAR CCSM4, Int. J. Climatol., 37, 1824–1833,
https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4815, 2016.
Large, W. G. and Yeager, S. G.: The global climatology of an interannually
varying air – Sea flux data set, Clim. Dynam., 33, 341–364,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-008-0441-3, 2009.
Leathers, D. J., Yarnal, B., Palecki, M. A., Leathers, D. J., Yarnal, B., and
Palecki, M. A.: The Pacific/North American Teleconnection Pattern and United
States Climate. Part I: Regional Temperature and Precipitation Associations,
J. Climate, 4, 517–528, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1991)004<0517:TPATPA>2.0.CO;2,
1991.
Levitus, S.: Climatological Atlas of the World Ocean, NOAA Prof. Paper 13,
173 pp. and 17 microfich, 1982.
Li, G. and Xie, S. P.: Tropical biases in CMIP5 multimodel ensemble: The
excessive equatorial pacific cold tongue and double ITCZ problems, J.
Climate, 27, 1765–1780, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00337.1, 2014.
Liebmann, B., Hendon, H. H., and Glick, J. D.: The Relationship Between
Tropical Cyclones of the Western Pacific and Indian Oceans and the
Madden-Julian Oscillation, J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn., 72, 401–412,
https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj1965.72.3_401, 1994.
Lin, H., Brunet, G., and Derome, J.: An observed connection between the North
Atlantic oscillation and the Madden-Julian oscillation, J. Climate, 22,
364–380, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JCLI2515.1, 2009.
Lumpkin, R. and Speer, K.: Global Ocean Meridional Overturning, J. Phys.
Oceanogr., 37, 2550–2562, https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO3130.1, 2007.
Lutz, K., Jacobeit, J., and Rathmann, J.: Atlantic warm and cold water events
and impact on African west coast precipitation, Int. J. Climatol., 35,
128–141, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3969, 2015.
Madden, R. A. and Julian, P. R.: Detection of a 40–50 Day Oscillation in
the Zonal Wind in the Tropical Pacific, J. Atmos. Sci., 28, 702–708,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1971)028<0702:DOADOI>2.0.CO;2, 1971.
Madden, R. A. and Julian, P. R.: Description of Global-Scale Circulation
Cells in the Tropics with a 40–50 Day Period, J. Atmos. Sci., 29,
1109–1123, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1972)029<1109:DOGSCC>2.0.CO;2, 1972.
Mantua, N. J., Hare, S. R., Zhang, Y., Wallace, J. M., and Francis, R. C.: A
Pacific Interdecadal Climate Oscillation with Impacts on Salmon Production,
B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 78, 1069–1079,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1997)078<1069:APICOW>2.0.CO;2, 1997.
Marengo, J. A., Calvalcanti, I. F. A., Satyamurty, P., Trosnikov, I., Nobre,
C. A., Bonatti, J. P., Camargo, H., Sampaio, G., Sanches, M. B., Manzi, A.
O., Castro, C. A. C., D'Almeida, C., Pezzi, L. P., and Candido, L.:
Assessment of regional seasonal rainfall predictability using the CPTEC/COLA
atmospheric GCM, Clim. Dynam., 21, 459–475, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-003-0346-0,
2003.
McCarthy, G. D., Smeed, D. A., Johns, W. E., Frajka-Williams, E., Moat, B.
I., Rayner, D., Baringer, M. O., Meinen, C. S., Collins, J., and Bryden, H.
L.: Measuring the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation at
26∘ N, Prog. Oceanogr., 130, 91–111,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2014.10.006, 2015.
McPhaden, M. J., Zebiak, S. E., and Glantz, M. H.: ENSO as an integrating
concept in earth science, Science, 314, 1740–1745,
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1132588, 2006.
Meehl, G. A., Moss, R., Taylor, K. E., Eyring, V., Stouffer, R. J., Bony,
S., and Stevens, B.: Climate model intercomparisons: Preparing for the next
phase, Eos, 95, 77–78, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014EO090001, 2014.
Mellor, G. L. and Yamada, T.: Development of a turbulence closure model for
geophysical fluid problems, Rev. Geophys., 20, 851–875,
https://doi.org/10.1029/RG020i004p00851, 1982.
Menary, M. B., Kuhlbrodt, T., Ridley, J., Andrews, M. B., Dimdore-Miles, O. B., Deshayes, J., Eade, R., Gray, L., Ineson, S., Mignot, J., Roberts, C. D., Robson, J., Wood, R. A., and Xavier, P.: Preindustrial
control simulations with HadGEM3-GC3.1 for CMIP6, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy.,
10, 3049–3075, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001495, 2018.
Mo, K. C. and Peagle, J. N.: The Pacific-South American modes and their
downstream effects, Int. J. Climatol., 21, 1211–1229, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.685,
2001.
Morice, C. P., Kennedy, J. J., Rayner, N. A., and Jones, P. D.: Quantifying
uncertainties in global and regional temperature change using an ensemble of
observational estimates: The HadCRUT4 data set, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117,
1–22, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD017187, 2012.
Newman, M., Alexander, M. A., Ault, T. R., Cobb, K. M., Deser, C., Di
Lorenzo, E., Mantua, N. J., Miller, A. J., Minobe, S., Nakamura, H.,
Schneider, N., Vimont, D. J., Phillips, A. S., Scott, J. D., and Smith, C.
A.: The Pacific decadal oscillation, revisited, J. Climate, 29, 4399–4427,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0508.1, 2016.
Ning, L. and Bradley, R. S.: NAO and PNA influences on winter temperature
and precipitation over the eastern United States in CMIP5 GCMs, Clim. Dynam.,
46, 1257–1276, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-015-2643-9, 2016.
Nobre, P. and Shukla, J.: Variation of Sea surface Temperature, Wind Stress,
and Rainfall over the Tropical Atlantic and South America, J. Climate, 9,
2464–2479, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1996)009<2464:VOSSTW>2.0.CO;2, 1996.
Nobre, P., Marengo, J. A., Cavalcanti, I. F. A., Obregon, G., Barros, V.,
Camilloni, I., Campos, N., and Ferreira, A. G.: Seasonal-to-decadal
predictability and prediction of South American climate, J. Climate, 19,
5988–6004, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3946.1, 2006.
Nobre, P., De Almeida, R. A., Malagutti, M., and Giarolla, E.: Coupled
ocean-atmosphere variations over the South Atlantic Ocean, J. Climate, 25,
6349–6358, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00444.1, 2012.
Nobre, P., Siqueira, L. S. P., De Almeida, R. A. F., Malagutti, M.,
Giarolla, E., Castelã O, G. P., Bottino, M. J., Kubota, P., Figueroa, S.
N., Costa, M. C., Baptista, M., Irber, L., and Marcondes, G. G.: Climate
simulation and change in the brazilian climate model, J. Climate, 26,
6716–6732, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00580.1, 2013.
Nogués-Paegle, J. and Mo, K. C.: Alternating Wet and Dry Conditions over
South America during Summer, Mon. Weather Rev., 125, 279–291,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1997)125<0279:AWADCO>2.0.CO;2, 1997.
Obukhov, A. M.: Turbulence in an atmosphere with a non-uniform temperature,
Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 2, 7–29, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00718085, 1971.
Richter, I.: Climate model biases in the eastern tropical oceans: Causes,
impacts and ways forward, Wires Clim. Change, 6, 345–358,
https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.338, 2015.
Richter, I., Xie, S. P., Behera, S. K., Doi, T., and Masumoto, Y.: Equatorial
Atlantic variability and its relation to mean state biases in CMIP5, Clim.
Dynam., 42, 171–188, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-012-1624-5, 2014.
Robertson, A. and Mechoso, C.: Interannual and interdecadal variability of
the South Atlantic Convergence Zone, Mon. Weather Rev., 128, 2947–2957,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2000)128<2947:IAIVOT>2.0.CO;2, 2000.
Rogers, J. C. and van Loon, H.: Spatial Variability of Sea Level Pressure
and 500 mb Height Anomalies over the Southern Hemisphere, Mon. Weather Rev.,
110, 1375–1392, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1982)110<1375:SVOSLP>2.0.CO;2, 1982.
Rossow, W. B. and Schiffer, R. a: Advances in Understanding Clouds from
ISCCP, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 80, 2261–2287,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1999)080<2261:AIUCFI>2.0.CO;2, 1999.
Straus, D. M. and Shukla, J.: Does ENSO force the PNA?, J. Climate, 15,
2340–2358, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2002)015<2340:DEFTP>2.0.CO;2, 2002.
Swapna, P., Krishnan, R., Sandeep, N., Prajeesh, A. G., Ayantika, D. C.,
Manmeet, S., and Vellore, R.: Long-Term Climate Simulations Using the IITM
Earth System Model (IITM-ESMv2) With Focus on the South Asian Monsoon, J.
Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 10, 1127–1149, https://doi.org/10.1029/2017MS001262, 2018.
Takayabu, Y. N., Iguchl, T., Kachi, M., Shibata, A., and Kanzawa, H.: Abrupt
termination of the 1997-98 El Nino in response to a Madden-Julian
oscillation, Nature, 402, 279–282, https://doi.org/10.1038/46254, 1999.
Tarasova, T. A. and Fomin, B. A.: Solar Radiation Absorption due to Water
Vapor: Advanced Broadband Parameterizations, J. Appl. Meteorol., 39,
1947–1951, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(2000)039<1947:SRADTW>2.0.CO;2, 2000.
Tian, B.: Spread of model climate sensitivity linked to double-Intertropical
Convergence Zone bias, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 4133–4141,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL064119, 2015.
Tian, B., Fetzer, E. J., Kahn, B. H., Teixeira, J., Manning, E., and Hearty,
T.: Evaluating CMIP5 models using AIRS tropospheric air temperature and
specific humidity climatology, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 114–134,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD018607, 2013.
Tiedtke, M.: The sensitivity of the time-mean large-scale flow to cumulus
convection in the ECMWF model, Proc. Work-shop on Convection in Large-Scale
Models, Reading, United Kingdom, ECMWF, 297–316, 1983.
von Storch, H.: Climate models and modeling: an editorial essay,
Wires Clim. Change, 1, 305–310, https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.12, 2010.
Waliser, D., Sperber, K., Hendon, H., Kim, D., Maloney, E., Wheeler, M.,
Weickmann, K., Zhang, C., Donner, L., Gottschalck, J., Higgins, W., Kang, I.
S., Legler, D., Moncrieff, M., Schubert, S., Stern, W., Vitart, F., Wang, B.,
Wang, W., and Woolnough, S.: MJO simulation diagnostics, J. Climate, 22,
3006–3030, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JCLI2731.1, 2009.
Wallace, J. M. and Gutzler, D. S.: Teleconnections in the Geopotential
Height Field during the Northern Hemisphere Winter, Mon. Weather Rev., 109,
784–812, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1981)109<0784:TITGHF>2.0.CO;2, 1981.
Wang, C., Zhang, L. and Lee, S.: A global perspective on CMIP5 climate model
biases, Nat. Clim. Change, 4, 201–205, https://doi.org/10.1038/NCLIMATE2118, 2014.
Wanner, H., Brönnimann, S., Casty, C., Luterbacher, J., Schmutz, C., and
David, B.: North Atlantic Oscillation – Concepts and Studies, Surv.
Geophys., 22, 321–382, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014217317898, 2001.
Weaver, A. J., Sedláček, J., Eby, M., Alexander, K., Crespin, E.,
Fichefet, T., Philippon-Berthier, G., Joos, F., Kawamiy, M., Matsumoto, K.,
Steinacher, M., Tachiiri, K., Tokos, K., Yoshimori, M., and Zickfeld, K.:
Stability of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation: A model
intercomparison, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, 1–7, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL053763,
2012.
Webster, S., Brown, A. R., Cameron, D. R., and Jones, P. C.: Improvements to
the representation of orography in the Met Office Unified Model, Q. J. Roy.
Meteor. Soc., 129, 1989–2010, https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.02.133, 2003.
Winton, M.: A reformulated three-layer sea ice model, J. Atmos. Ocean.
Tech., 17, 525–531, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(2000)017<0525:ARTLSI>2.0.CO;2,
2000.
Wu, X. and Mao, J.: Interdecadal variability of early summer monsoon
rainfall over South China in association with the Pacific Decadal
Oscillation, Int. J. Climatol., https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4734, 2016.
Wu, Z., Li, J., Jiang, Z., He, J., and Zhu, X.: Possible effects of the North
Atlantic Oscillation on the strengthening relationship between the East Asian
Summer monsoon and ENSO, Int. J. Climatol., 32, 794–800,
https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.2309, 2012.
Xie, P. and Arkin, P. A.: Global precipitation: A 17-year monthly
analysis based on gauge observations, satellite estimates, and numerical
model outputs, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 78, 2539–2558, 1997.
Xie, S.-P.: A Dynamic Ocean – Atmosphere Model of the Tropical Atlantic
Decadal Variability, J. Climate, 12, 64–71, 1999.
Xie, S.-P. and Philander, S. G. H.: A coupled ocean-atmosphere model of
relevance to the ITCZ in the eastern Pacific, Tellus A, 46, 340–350,
https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0870.1994.t01-1-00001.x, 1994.
Xue, Y., Sellers, P., Kinter, J., and Shukla, J.: A Simplified Biosphere
Model for Global Climate Studies, J. Climate, 4, 345–364,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1991)004<0345:ASBMFG>2.0.CO;2, 1991.
Yu, B. and Zwiers, F. W.: The impact of combined ENSO and PDO on the PNA
climate: A 1,000-year climate modeling study, Clim. Dynam., 29, 837–851,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-007-0267-4, 2007.
Yu, R. and Zhou, T.: Impacts of winter-NAO on March cooling trends over
subtropical Eurasia continent in the recent half century, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 31, 3–6, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL019814, 2004.
Yuan, X. and Yonekura, E.: Decadal variability in the Southern Hemisphere,
J. Geophys. Res., 116, 1–12, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD015673, 2011.
Zebiak, S. E.: Air–Sea Interaction in the Equatorial Atlantic Region, J.
Climate, 6, 1567–1586, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1993)006<1567:AIITEA>2.0.CO;2,
1993.
Zhang, C.: Madden-Julian Oscillation, Rev. Geophys., 43, 1–36,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2004RG000158, 2005.
Zhang, L. and Wang, C.: Multidecadal North Atlantic sea surface temperature
and Atlantic meridional overturning circulation variability in CMIP5
historical simulations, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 118, 5772–5791,
https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrc.20390, 2013.
Zhang, L., Ma, H., and Wu, L.: Dynamics and mechanisms of decadal variability
of the Pacific-South America mode over the 20th century, Clim. Dynam., 46,
3657–3667, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-015-2794-8, 2016.
Zheng, F., Li, J., Clark, R. T., and Nnamchi, H. C.: Simulation and
projection of the Southern Hemisphere annular mode in CMIP5 models, J.
Climate, 26, 9860–9879, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00204.1, 2013.
Download
The requested paper has a corresponding corrigendum published. Please read the corrigendum first before downloading the article.
- Article
(16628 KB) - Full-text XML
Short summary
This study evaluates the Brazilian Earth System Model with coupled ocean–atmosphere version 2.5 (BESM-OA2.5) and the effectiveness of reproducing the main characteristics of the atmospheric and oceanic variability in a real-life-based scenario of greenhouse gas increase (the CMIP5 historical protocol). The evaluation specifically focuses on how the model simulates the mean climate state, as well as the most important large-scale climate patterns.
This study evaluates the Brazilian Earth System Model with coupled ocean–atmosphere version 2.5...
