Articles | Volume 11, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3883-2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3883-2018
Development and technical paper
 | 
27 Sep 2018
Development and technical paper |  | 27 Sep 2018

LCice 1.0 – a generalized Ice Sheet System Model coupler for LOVECLIM version 1.3: description, sensitivities, and validation with the Glacial Systems Model (GSM version D2017.aug17)

Taimaz Bahadory and Lev Tarasov

Related authors

The comparative role of physical system processes in Hudson Strait ice stream cycling: a comprehensive model-based test of Heinrich event hypotheses
Kevin Hank and Lev Tarasov
Clim. Past, 20, 2499–2524, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-20-2499-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-20-2499-2024, 2024
Short summary
A history-matching analysis of the Antarctic Ice Sheet since the last interglacial – Part 1: Ice sheet evolution
Benoit S. Lecavalier and Lev Tarasov
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1291,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1291, 2024
Short summary
North American Pleistocene Glacial Erosion and Thin Pliocene Regolith Thickness Inferred from Data-Constrained Fully Coupled Ice-Climate-Sediment modelling
Matthew Drew and Lev Tarasov
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-620,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-620, 2024
Short summary
Uncertainties originating from GCM downscaling and bias correction with application to the MIS-11c Greenland Ice Sheet
Brian R. Crow, Lev Tarasov, Michael Schulz, and Matthias Prange
Clim. Past, 20, 281–296, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-20-281-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-20-281-2024, 2024
Short summary
Surging of a Hudson Strait-scale ice stream: subglacial hydrology matters but the process details mostly do not
Matthew Drew and Lev Tarasov
The Cryosphere, 17, 5391–5415, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-5391-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-5391-2023, 2023
Short summary

Related subject area

Climate and Earth system modeling
The need for carbon-emissions-driven climate projections in CMIP7
Benjamin M. Sanderson, Ben B. B. Booth, John Dunne, Veronika Eyring, Rosie A. Fisher, Pierre Friedlingstein, Matthew J. Gidden, Tomohiro Hajima, Chris D. Jones, Colin G. Jones, Andrew King, Charles D. Koven, David M. Lawrence, Jason Lowe, Nadine Mengis, Glen P. Peters, Joeri Rogelj, Chris Smith, Abigail C. Snyder, Isla R. Simpson, Abigail L. S. Swann, Claudia Tebaldi, Tatiana Ilyina, Carl-Friedrich Schleussner, Roland Séférian, Bjørn H. Samset, Detlef van Vuuren, and Sönke Zaehle
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8141–8172, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8141-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8141-2024, 2024
Short summary
Robust handling of extremes in quantile mapping – “Murder your darlings”
Peter Berg, Thomas Bosshard, Denica Bozhinova, Lars Bärring, Joakim Löw, Carolina Nilsson, Gustav Strandberg, Johan Södling, Johan Thuresson, Renate Wilcke, and Wei Yang
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8173–8179, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8173-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8173-2024, 2024
Short summary
A protocol for model intercomparison of impacts of marine cloud brightening climate intervention
Philip J. Rasch, Haruki Hirasawa, Mingxuan Wu, Sarah J. Doherty, Robert Wood, Hailong Wang, Andy Jones, James Haywood, and Hansi Singh
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7963–7994, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7963-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7963-2024, 2024
Short summary
An extensible perturbed parameter ensemble for the Community Atmosphere Model version 6
Trude Eidhammer, Andrew Gettelman, Katherine Thayer-Calder, Duncan Watson-Parris, Gregory Elsaesser, Hugh Morrison, Marcus van Lier-Walqui, Ci Song, and Daniel McCoy
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7835–7853, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7835-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7835-2024, 2024
Short summary
Coupling the regional climate model ICON-CLM v2.6.6 to the Earth system model GCOAST-AHOI v2.0 using OASIS3-MCT v4.0
Ha Thi Minh Ho-Hagemann, Vera Maurer, Stefan Poll, and Irina Fast
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7815–7834, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7815-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7815-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Arnold, N. S., Rees, W. G., Hodson, A. J., and Kohler, J.: Topographic controls on the surface energy balance of a high Arctic valley glacier, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth Surf., 111, F02011, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JF000426, 2006. a, b
Bahadory, T. and Tarasov, L.: LCice 1.0: A generalized Ice Sheet Systems Model coupler for LOVECLIM version 1.3, Zenodo, available at: http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1409282, last access: 21 September 2018. 
Balmaseda, M. A., Vidard, A., and Anderson, D. L. T.: The ECMWF Ocean Analysis System: ORA-S3, Mon. Weather Rev., 136, 3018–3034, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008MWR2433.1, 2008. a, b
Bassford, R., Siegert, M., and Dowdeswell, J.: Quantifying the mass balance of ice caps on Severnaya Zemlya, Russian High Arctic. II: Modeling the flow of the Vavilov Ice Cap under the present climate, Arct. Antarct. Alpine Res., 38, 13–20, 2006a. a
Bassford, R., Siegert, M., Dowdeswell, J., Oerlemans, J., Glazovsky, A., and Macheret, Y.: Quantifying the mass balance of ice caps on Severnaya Zemlya, Russian High Arctic. I: Climate and mass balance of the Vavilov Ice Cap, Arct. Antarct. Alpine Res., 38, 1–12, 2006b. a
Download
Short summary
We describe a new coupling between the Glacial Systems Model and the LOVECLIM intermediate complexity climate model. The coupling is distinguished from that of previous studies by greater completeness and accuracy, with the intent of capturing the major feedbacks between ice sheets and climate on glacial cycle timescales. The fully coupled model will be used to examine the ice/climate phase space of past glacial cycles.