Articles | Volume 10, issue 11
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 4187–4205, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4187-2017
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 4187–4205, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4187-2017
Development and technical paper
17 Nov 2017
Development and technical paper | 17 Nov 2017

Numerical framework for the computation of urban flux footprints employing large-eddy simulation and Lagrangian stochastic modeling

Mikko Auvinen et al.

Related authors

Sensitivity analysis of the PALM model system 6.0 in the urban environment
Michal Belda, Jaroslav Resler, Jan Geletič, Pavel Krč, Björn Maronga, Matthias Sühring, Mona Kurppa, Farah Kanani-Sühring, Vladimír Fuka, Kryštof Eben, Nina Benešová, and Mikko Auvinen
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 4443–4464, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-4443-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-4443-2021, 2021
Short summary
A nested multi-scale system implemented in the large-eddy simulation model PALM model system 6.0
Antti Hellsten, Klaus Ketelsen, Matthias Sühring, Mikko Auvinen, Björn Maronga, Christoph Knigge, Fotios Barmpas, Georgios Tsegas, Nicolas Moussiopoulos, and Siegfried Raasch
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 3185–3214, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3185-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3185-2021, 2021
Short summary
Implementation of the sectional aerosol module SALSA2.0 into the PALM model system 6.0: model development and first evaluation
Mona Kurppa, Antti Hellsten, Pontus Roldin, Harri Kokkola, Juha Tonttila, Mikko Auvinen, Christoph Kent, Prashant Kumar, Björn Maronga, and Leena Järvi
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 1403–1422, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1403-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1403-2019, 2019
Short summary
Sensitivity analysis of the meteorological preprocessor MPP-FMI 3.0 using algorithmic differentiation
John Backman, Curtis R. Wood, Mikko Auvinen, Leena Kangas, Hanna Hannuniemi, Ari Karppinen, and Jaakko Kukkonen
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 3793–3803, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3793-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3793-2017, 2017
Short summary
EXTRACTING URBAN MORPHOLOGY FOR ATMOSPHERIC MODELING FROM MULTISPECTRAL AND SAR SATELLITE IMAGERY
S. Wittke, K. Karila, E. Puttonen, A. Hellsten, M. Auvinen, and M. Karjalainen
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-1-W1, 425–431, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-1-W1-425-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-1-W1-425-2017, 2017

Related subject area

Atmospheric sciences
Conservation laws in a neural network architecture: enforcing the atom balance of a Julia-based photochemical model (v0.2.0)
Patrick Obin Sturm and Anthony S. Wexler
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 3417–3431, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3417-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3417-2022, 2022
Short summary
On the application and grid-size sensitivity of the urban dispersion model CAIRDIO v2.0 under real city weather conditions
Michael Weger, Holger Baars, Henriette Gebauer, Maik Merkel, Alfred Wiedensohler, and Bernd Heinold
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 3315–3345, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3315-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3315-2022, 2022
Short summary
Development and evaluation of an advanced National Air Quality Forecasting Capability using the NOAA Global Forecast System version 16
Patrick C. Campbell, Youhua Tang, Pius Lee, Barry Baker, Daniel Tong, Rick Saylor, Ariel Stein, Jianping Huang, Ho-Chun Huang, Edward Strobach, Jeff McQueen, Li Pan, Ivanka Stajner, Jamese Sims, Jose Tirado-Delgado, Youngsun Jung, Fanglin Yang, Tanya L. Spero, and Robert C. Gilliam
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 3281–3313, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3281-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3281-2022, 2022
Short summary
Estimating aerosol emission from SPEXone on the NASA PACE mission using an ensemble Kalman smoother: observing system simulation experiments (OSSEs)
Athanasios Tsikerdekis, Nick A. J. Schutgens, Guangliang Fu, and Otto P. Hasekamp
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 3253–3279, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3253-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3253-2022, 2022
Short summary
An ensemble-based statistical methodology to detect differences in weather and climate model executables
Christian Zeman and Christoph Schär
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 3183–3203, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3183-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3183-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Anderson, W.: Amplitude modulation of streamwise velocity fluctuations in the roughness sublayer: Evidence from large-eddy simulations, J. Fluid Mech., 789, 567–588, https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2015.744, 2016.
Aubinet, M., Vesala, T., and Papale, D. (Eds.): Eddy covariance. A Practical Guide to Measurement and Data Analysis, Springer, 2012.
Christen, A., Coops, N., Crawford, B., Kellett, R., Liss, K., Olchovski, I., Tooke, T., van der Laan, M., and Voogt, J.: Validation of modeled carbon-dioxide emissions from an urban neighborhood with direct eddy-covariance measurements, Atmos. Environ., 45, 6057–6069, 2011.
Deardorff, J.: Stratoculumus-capped mixed layers derived from a three-dimensional model, Bound-Lay. Meteorol., 18, 495–527, 1980.
Giometto, M., Christen, A., Meneveau, C., Fang, J., Krafczyk, M., and Parlange, M.: Spatial Characteristics of Roughness Sublayer Mean Flow and Turbulence Over a Realistic Urban Surface, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 160, 425–452, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-016-0157-6, 2016.
Download
Short summary
Correct spatial interpretation of a micrometeorological measurement requires the determination of its effective source area, or footprint. In urban areas the use of analytical models becomes highly questionable. This work introduces a computational methodology that enables the generation of footprints for complex urban sites. The methodology is based on conducting high-resolution flow and particle analysis on a model that features a detailed topographic description of a real city environment.