Articles | Volume 10, issue 11
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4187-2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4187-2017
Development and technical paper
 | 
17 Nov 2017
Development and technical paper |  | 17 Nov 2017

Numerical framework for the computation of urban flux footprints employing large-eddy simulation and Lagrangian stochastic modeling

Mikko Auvinen, Leena Järvi, Antti Hellsten, Üllar Rannik, and Timo Vesala

Related authors

Sensitivity analysis of the PALM model system 6.0 in the urban environment
Michal Belda, Jaroslav Resler, Jan Geletič, Pavel Krč, Björn Maronga, Matthias Sühring, Mona Kurppa, Farah Kanani-Sühring, Vladimír Fuka, Kryštof Eben, Nina Benešová, and Mikko Auvinen
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 4443–4464, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-4443-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-4443-2021, 2021
Short summary
A nested multi-scale system implemented in the large-eddy simulation model PALM model system 6.0
Antti Hellsten, Klaus Ketelsen, Matthias Sühring, Mikko Auvinen, Björn Maronga, Christoph Knigge, Fotios Barmpas, Georgios Tsegas, Nicolas Moussiopoulos, and Siegfried Raasch
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 3185–3214, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3185-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3185-2021, 2021
Short summary
Implementation of the sectional aerosol module SALSA2.0 into the PALM model system 6.0: model development and first evaluation
Mona Kurppa, Antti Hellsten, Pontus Roldin, Harri Kokkola, Juha Tonttila, Mikko Auvinen, Christoph Kent, Prashant Kumar, Björn Maronga, and Leena Järvi
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 1403–1422, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1403-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1403-2019, 2019
Short summary
Sensitivity analysis of the meteorological preprocessor MPP-FMI 3.0 using algorithmic differentiation
John Backman, Curtis R. Wood, Mikko Auvinen, Leena Kangas, Hanna Hannuniemi, Ari Karppinen, and Jaakko Kukkonen
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 3793–3803, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3793-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3793-2017, 2017
Short summary
EXTRACTING URBAN MORPHOLOGY FOR ATMOSPHERIC MODELING FROM MULTISPECTRAL AND SAR SATELLITE IMAGERY
S. Wittke, K. Karila, E. Puttonen, A. Hellsten, M. Auvinen, and M. Karjalainen
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-1-W1, 425–431, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-1-W1-425-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-1-W1-425-2017, 2017

Related subject area

Atmospheric sciences
Valid time shifting ensemble Kalman filter (VTS-EnKF) for dust storm forecasting
Mijie Pang, Jianbing Jin, Arjo Segers, Huiya Jiang, Wei Han, Batjargal Buyantogtokh, Ji Xia, Li Fang, Jiandong Li, Hai Xiang Lin, and Hong Liao
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8223–8242, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8223-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8223-2024, 2024
Short summary
An updated parameterization of the unstable atmospheric surface layer in the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) modeling system
Prabhakar Namdev, Maithili Sharan, Piyush Srivastava, and Saroj Kanta Mishra
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8093–8114, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8093-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8093-2024, 2024
Short summary
The impact of cloud microphysics and ice nucleation on Southern Ocean clouds assessed with single-column modeling and instrument simulators
Andrew Gettelman, Richard Forbes, Roger Marchand, Chih-Chieh Chen, and Mark Fielding
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8069–8092, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8069-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8069-2024, 2024
Short summary
An updated aerosol simulation in the Community Earth System Model (v2.1.3): dust and marine aerosol emissions and secondary organic aerosol formation
Yujuan Wang, Peng Zhang, Jie Li, Yaman Liu, Yanxu Zhang, Jiawei Li, and Zhiwei Han
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7995–8021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7995-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7995-2024, 2024
Short summary
Exploring ship track spreading rates with a physics-informed Langevin particle parameterization
Lucas A. McMichael, Michael J. Schmidt, Robert Wood, Peter N. Blossey, and Lekha Patel
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7867–7888, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7867-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7867-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Anderson, W.: Amplitude modulation of streamwise velocity fluctuations in the roughness sublayer: Evidence from large-eddy simulations, J. Fluid Mech., 789, 567–588, https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2015.744, 2016.
Aubinet, M., Vesala, T., and Papale, D. (Eds.): Eddy covariance. A Practical Guide to Measurement and Data Analysis, Springer, 2012.
Christen, A., Coops, N., Crawford, B., Kellett, R., Liss, K., Olchovski, I., Tooke, T., van der Laan, M., and Voogt, J.: Validation of modeled carbon-dioxide emissions from an urban neighborhood with direct eddy-covariance measurements, Atmos. Environ., 45, 6057–6069, 2011.
Deardorff, J.: Stratoculumus-capped mixed layers derived from a three-dimensional model, Bound-Lay. Meteorol., 18, 495–527, 1980.
Giometto, M., Christen, A., Meneveau, C., Fang, J., Krafczyk, M., and Parlange, M.: Spatial Characteristics of Roughness Sublayer Mean Flow and Turbulence Over a Realistic Urban Surface, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 160, 425–452, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-016-0157-6, 2016.
Download
Short summary
Correct spatial interpretation of a micrometeorological measurement requires the determination of its effective source area, or footprint. In urban areas the use of analytical models becomes highly questionable. This work introduces a computational methodology that enables the generation of footprints for complex urban sites. The methodology is based on conducting high-resolution flow and particle analysis on a model that features a detailed topographic description of a real city environment.