Articles | Volume 10, issue 5
Methods for assessment of models
12 May 2017
Methods for assessment of models |  | 12 May 2017

Exploring precipitation pattern scaling methodologies and robustness among CMIP5 models

Ben Kravitz, Cary Lynch, Corinne Hartin, and Ben Bond-Lamberty

Related authors

Opinion: The scientific and community-building roles of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) – past, present, and future
Daniele Visioni, Ben Kravitz, Alan Robock, Simone Tilmes, Jim Haywood, Olivier Boucher, Mark Lawrence, Peter Irvine, Ulrike Niemeier, Lili Xia, Gabriel Chiodo, Chris Lennard, Shingo Watanabe, John C. Moore, and Helene Muri
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 5149–5176,,, 2023
Short summary
Injection strategy – a driver of atmospheric circulation and ozone response to stratospheric aerosol geoengineering
Ewa M. Bednarz, Amy H. Butler, Daniele Visioni, Yan Zhang, Ben Kravitz, and Douglas G. MacMartin
EGUsphere,,, 2023
Short summary
Introducing a Comprehensive Set of Stratospheric Aerosol Injection Strategies
Yan Zhang, Douglas G. MacMartin, Daniele Visioni, Ewa Bednarz, and Ben Kravitz
EGUsphere,,, 2023
Short summary
Climate response to off-equatorial stratospheric sulfur injections in three Earth system models – Part 1: Experimental protocols and surface changes
Daniele Visioni, Ewa M. Bednarz, Walker R. Lee, Ben Kravitz, Andy Jones, Jim M. Haywood, and Douglas G. MacMartin
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 663–685,,, 2023
Short summary
Climate response to off-equatorial stratospheric sulfur injections in three Earth system models – Part 2: Stratospheric and free-tropospheric response
Ewa M. Bednarz, Daniele Visioni, Ben Kravitz, Andy Jones, James M. Haywood, Jadwiga Richter, Douglas G. MacMartin, and Peter Braesicke
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 687–709,,, 2023
Short summary

Related subject area

Climate and Earth system modeling
Differentiable programming for Earth system modeling
Maximilian Gelbrecht, Alistair White, Sebastian Bathiany, and Niklas Boers
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 3123–3135,,, 2023
Short summary
Evaluation of CMIP6 model performances in simulating fire weather spatiotemporal variability on global and regional scales
Carolina Gallo, Jonathan M. Eden, Bastien Dieppois, Igor Drobyshev, Peter Z. Fulé, Jesús San-Miguel-Ayanz, and Matthew Blackett
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 3103–3122,,, 2023
Short summary
Data-driven aeolian dust emission scheme for climate modelling evaluated with EMAC 2.55.2
Klaus Klingmüller and Jos Lelieveld
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 3013–3028,,, 2023
Short summary
Testing the reconstruction of modelled particulate organic carbon from surface ecosystem components using PlankTOM12 and machine learning
Anna Denvil-Sommer, Erik T. Buitenhuis, Rainer Kiko, Fabien Lombard, Lionel Guidi, and Corinne Le Quéré
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 2995–3012,,, 2023
Short summary
An improved method of the Globally Resolved Energy Balance model by the Bayesian networks
Zhenxia Liu, Zengjie Wang, Jian Wang, Zhengfang Zhang, Dongshuang Li, Zhaoyuan Yu, Linwang Yuan, and Wen Luo
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 2939–2955,,, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Barnes, E. A. and Barnes, R. J.: Estimating linear trends: Simple linear regression versus epoch differences, J. Climate, 28, 9969–9976,, 2015.
Bentsen, M., Bethke, I., Debernard, J. B., Iversen, T., Kirkevåg, A., Seland, Ø., Drange, H., Roelandt, C., Seierstad, I. A., Hoose, C., and Kristjánsson, J. E.: The Norwegian Earth System Model, NorESM1-M – Part 1: Description and basic evaluation of the physical climate, Geosci. Model Dev., 6, 687–720,, 2013.
Cagnazzo, C., Manzini, E., Fogli, P. G., Vichi, M., and Davini, P.: Role of stratospheric dynamics in the ozone-carbon connection in the Southern Hemisphere, Clim. Dynam., 41, 3039–3054,, 2013.
Castruccio, S., McInerney, D. J., Stein, M. L., Crouch, F. L., Jacob, R. L., and Moyer, E. J.: Statistical Emulation of Climate Model Projections Based on Precomputed GCM Runs, J. Climate, 27, 1829–1844,, 2014.
Davini, P., Cagnazzo, C., Fogi, P. G., Manzini, E., Gualdi, S., and Navarra, A.: European blocking and Atlantic jet stream variability in the NCEP/NCAR reanalysis and the CMCC-CMS climate model, Clim. Dynam., 43, 71–85,, 2014.
Short summary
Pattern scaling is a way of approximating regional changes without needing to run a full, complex global climate model. We compare two methods of pattern scaling for precipitation and evaluate which methods is better in particular circumstances. We also decompose precipitation into a CO2 portion and a non-CO2 portion. The methodologies discussed in this paper can help provide precipitation fields for other models for a wide variety of scenarios of future climate change.