Articles | Volume 8, issue 7
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-1899-2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-1899-2015
Methods for assessment of models
 | 
01 Jul 2015
Methods for assessment of models |  | 01 Jul 2015

Global sensitivity analysis, probabilistic calibration, and predictive assessment for the data assimilation linked ecosystem carbon model

C. Safta, D. M. Ricciuto, K. Sargsyan, B. Debusschere, H. N. Najm, M. Williams, and P. E. Thornton

Related authors

Bayesian calibration of terrestrial ecosystem models: a study of advanced Markov chain Monte Carlo methods
Dan Lu, Daniel Ricciuto, Anthony Walker, Cosmin Safta, and William Munger
Biogeosciences, 14, 4295–4314, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-4295-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-4295-2017, 2017
Short summary

Related subject area

Climate and Earth system modeling
Validating a microphysical prognostic stratospheric aerosol implementation in E3SMv2 using observations after the Mount Pinatubo eruption
Hunter York Brown, Benjamin Wagman, Diana Bull, Kara Peterson, Benjamin Hillman, Xiaohong Liu, Ziming Ke, and Lin Lin
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 5087–5121, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5087-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5087-2024, 2024
Short summary
Implementing detailed nucleation predictions in the Earth system model EC-Earth3.3.4: sulfuric acid–ammonia nucleation
Carl Svenhag, Moa K. Sporre, Tinja Olenius, Daniel Yazgi, Sara M. Blichner, Lars P. Nieradzik, and Pontus Roldin
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4923–4942, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4923-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4923-2024, 2024
Short summary
Modeling biochar effects on soil organic carbon on croplands in a microbial decomposition model (MIMICS-BC_v1.0)
Mengjie Han, Qing Zhao, Xili Wang, Ying-Ping Wang, Philippe Ciais, Haicheng Zhang, Daniel S. Goll, Lei Zhu, Zhe Zhao, Zhixuan Guo, Chen Wang, Wei Zhuang, Fengchang Wu, and Wei Li
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4871–4890, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4871-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4871-2024, 2024
Short summary
Hector V3.2.0: functionality and performance of a reduced-complexity climate model
Kalyn Dorheim, Skylar Gering, Robert Gieseke, Corinne Hartin, Leeya Pressburger, Alexey N. Shiklomanov, Steven J. Smith, Claudia Tebaldi, Dawn L. Woodard, and Ben Bond-Lamberty
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4855–4869, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4855-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4855-2024, 2024
Short summary
Evaluation of CMIP6 model simulations of PM2.5 and its components over China
Fangxuan Ren, Jintai Lin, Chenghao Xu, Jamiu A. Adeniran, Jingxu Wang, Randall V. Martin, Aaron van Donkelaar, Melanie S. Hammer, Larry W. Horowitz, Steven T. Turnock, Naga Oshima, Jie Zhang, Susanne Bauer, Kostas Tsigaridis, Øyvind Seland, Pierre Nabat, David Neubauer, Gary Strand, Twan van Noije, Philippe Le Sager, and Toshihiko Takemura
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4821–4836, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4821-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4821-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Barr, A., Hollinger, D., and Richardson, A. D.: CO2 Flux Measurement Uncertainty Estimates for NACP, AGU Fall Meeting, December 2009, abstract number B54A-04B, 2009.
Barr, A., Ricciuto, D. M., Schaefer, K., Richardson, A., Agarwal, D., Thornton, P. E., Davis, K., Jackson, B., Cook, R. B., Hollinger, D. Y., van Ingen, C., Amiro, B., ans M. A. Arain, A. A., Baldocchi, D., Black, T. A., Bolstad, P., Curtis, P., Desai, A., Dragoni, D., Flanagan, L., Gu, L., Katul, G., Law, B. E., Lafleur, P., Margolis, H., Matamala, R., Meyers, T., McCaughey, H., Monson, R., Munger, J. W., Oechel, W., Oren, R., Roulet, N., Torn, M., and Verma, S.: NACP Site: Tower Meteorology, Flux Observations with Uncertainty, and Ancillary Data, available at: http://daac.ornl.gov (last access: 10 June 2015) from Oak Ridge National Laboratory Distributed Active Archive Center, https://doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1178, 2013.
Braswell, B. H., Sacks, W. J., Linder, E., and Schimel, D. S.: Estimating diurnal to annual ecosystem parameters by synthesis of a carbon flux model with eddy covariance net ecosystem exchange observations, Global Change Biol., 11, 335–355, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.00897.x, 2005.
Campolongo, F., Saltelli, A., Sørensen, T., and Tarantola, S.: Hitchhiker's Guide to Sensitivity Analysis, in: Sensitivity Analysis, edited by: Saltelli, A., Chan, K., and Scott, E., Wiley, Chicester, 2000.
Fox, A., Williams, M., Richardson, A. D., Cameron, D., Gove, J. H., Quaife, T., Ricciuto, D. M., Reichstein, M., Tomelleri, E., Trudinger, C. M., and Wijk, M. T. V.: The REFLEX project: Comparing different algorithms and implementations for the inversion of a terrestrial ecosystem model against eddy covariance data, Agric. For. Meteorol., 149, 1597–1615, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2009.05.002, 2009.
Download
Short summary
In this paper we propose a probabilistic framework for an uncertainty quantification study of a carbon cycle model and focus on the comparison between steady-state and transient simulation setups. We study model parameters via global sensitivity analysis and employ a Bayesian approach to calibrate these parameters using NEE observations at the Harvard Forest site. The calibration results are then used to assess the predictive skill of the model via posterior predictive checks.