Articles | Volume 8, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-1357-2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-1357-2015
Model description paper
 | 
12 May 2015
Model description paper |  | 12 May 2015

A dynamic marine iron cycle module coupled to the University of Victoria Earth System Model: the Kiel Marine Biogeochemical Model 2 for UVic 2.9

L. Nickelsen, D. P. Keller, and A. Oschlies

Related authors

Southern Ocean phytoplankton under climate change: a shifting balance of bottom-up and top-down control
Tianfei Xue, Jens Terhaar, A. E. Friederike Prowe, Thomas L. Frölicher, Andreas Oschlies, and Ivy Frenger
Biogeosciences, 21, 2473–2491, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-2473-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-2473-2024, 2024
Short summary
Riverine nutrient impact on global ocean nitrogen cycle feedbacks and marine primary production in an Earth System Model
Miriam Tivig, David Peter Keller, and Andreas Oschlies
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-258,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-258, 2024
Short summary
Global impact of benthic denitrification on marine N2 fixation and primary production simulated by a variable-stoichiometry Earth system model
Na Li, Christopher J. Somes, Angela Landolfi, Chia-Te Chien, Markus Pahlow, and Andreas Oschlies
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-123,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-123, 2024
Short summary
Modelling considerations for research on ocean alkalinity enhancement (OAE)
Katja Fennel, Matthew C. Long, Christopher Algar, Brendan Carter, David Keller, Arnaud Laurent, Jann Paul Mattern, Ruth Musgrave, Andreas Oschlies, Josiane Ostiguy, Jaime B. Palter, and Daniel B. Whitt
State Planet, 2-oae2023, 9, https://doi.org/10.5194/sp-2-oae2023-9-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/sp-2-oae2023-9-2023, 2023
Short summary
Climate targets, carbon dioxide removal, and the potential role of ocean alkalinity enhancement
Andreas Oschlies, Lennart T. Bach, Rosalind E. M. Rickaby, Terre Satterfield, Romany Webb, and Jean-Pierre Gattuso
State Planet, 2-oae2023, 1, https://doi.org/10.5194/sp-2-oae2023-1-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/sp-2-oae2023-1-2023, 2023
Short summary

Related subject area

Biogeosciences
Dynamic ecosystem assembly and escaping the “fire trap” in the tropics: insights from FATES_15.0.0
Jacquelyn K. Shuman, Rosie A. Fisher, Charles Koven, Ryan Knox, Lara Kueppers, and Chonggang Xu
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4643–4671, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4643-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4643-2024, 2024
Short summary
In silico calculation of soil pH by SCEPTER v1.0
Yoshiki Kanzaki, Isabella Chiaravalloti, Shuang Zhang, Noah J. Planavsky, and Christopher T. Reinhard
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4515–4532, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4515-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4515-2024, 2024
Short summary
Simple process-led algorithms for simulating habitats (SPLASH v.2.0): robust calculations of water and energy fluxes
David Sandoval, Iain Colin Prentice, and Rodolfo L. B. Nóbrega
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4229–4309, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4229-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4229-2024, 2024
Short summary
A global behavioural model of human fire use and management: WHAM! v1.0
Oliver Perkins, Matthew Kasoar, Apostolos Voulgarakis, Cathy Smith, Jay Mistry, and James D. A. Millington
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3993–4016, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3993-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3993-2024, 2024
Short summary
Terrestrial Ecosystem Model in R (TEMIR) version 1.0: simulating ecophysiological responses of vegetation to atmospheric chemical and meteorological changes
Amos P. K. Tai, David H. Y. Yung, and Timothy Lam
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3733–3764, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3733-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3733-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Arndt, S., Jørgensen, B., LaRowe, D., Middelburg, J., Pancost, R., and Regnier, P.: Quantifying the degradation of organic matter in marine sediments: a review and synthesis, Earth-Sci. Rev., 123, 53–86, 2013.
Arnosti, C., Jørgensen, B., Sagemann, J., and Thamdrup, B.: Temperature dependence of microbial degradation of organic matter in marine sediments: polysaccharide hydrolysis, oxygen consumption, and sulfate reduction, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 165, 59–70, 1998.
Aumont, O. and Bopp, L.: Globalizing results from ocean in situ iron fertilization studies, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 20, 1–15, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GB002591, 2006.
Baker, A. R. and Croot, P.: Atmospheric and marine controls on aerosol iron solubility in seawater, Mar. Chem., 120, 4–13, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2008.09.003, 2010.
Behrenfeld, M. J. and Falkowski, P.: Photosynthetic rates derived from satellite-based chlorophyll concentration, Limnol. Oceanogr., 42, 1–20, 1997.
Download
Short summary
In this paper we find that including the marine cycle of the phytoplankton nutrient iron in a global climate model improves the agreement between observed and simulated nutrient concentrations in the ocean and that a better description of the source of iron from the sediment to the ocean is more important than that of iron-containing dust deposition. Finally, we find that the response of the iron cycle to climate warming affects the phytoplankton growth and nutrient cycles.