A dynamic marine iron cycle module coupled to the University of Victoria Earth System Model: the Kiel Marine Biogeochemical Model 2 for UVic 2.9

Nickelsen, L.; Keller, D. P.; Oschlies, A.

doi:https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-1357-2015

Articles | Volume 8, issue 5

https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-1357-2015

© Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-1357-2015

© Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Articles | Volume 8, issue 5

Model description paper

|

12 May 2015

Model description paper |

| 12 May 2015

A dynamic marine iron cycle module coupled to the University of Victoria Earth System Model: the Kiel Marine Biogeochemical Model 2 for UVic 2.9

L. Nickelsen, D. P. Keller, and A. Oschlies

Download

Final revised paper (published on 12 May 2015)
Supplement to the final revised paper
Preprint (discussion started on 05 Dec 2014)
Supplement to the preprint

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment

- Printer-friendly version

- Supplement

RC C2826: 'Interactive Comments on, ‘A dynamic marine iron cycle module coupled to the University of Victoria Earth System Model: the Kiel Marine Biogeochemical Model 2 (KMBM2) for UVic 2.9’', Anonymous Referee #1, 02 Jan 2015
- AC C3474: 'Response to Anonymous Referee #1', Levin Nickelsen, 04 Mar 2015
RC C3240: 'Review', A. Tagliabue, 02 Feb 2015
- AC C3484: 'Response to Referee #2 A. Tagliabue', Levin Nickelsen, 04 Mar 2015

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision

AR by Levin Nickelsen on behalf of the Authors (05 Mar 2015) Author's response Manuscript

ED: Publish as is (19 Apr 2015) by Andy Ridgwell

AR by Levin Nickelsen on behalf of the Authors (20 Apr 2015)

Short summary

In this paper we find that including the marine cycle of the phytoplankton nutrient iron in a global climate model improves the agreement between observed and simulated nutrient concentrations in the ocean and that a better description of the source of iron from the sediment to the ocean is more important than that of iron-containing dust deposition. Finally, we find that the response of the iron cycle to climate warming affects the phytoplankton growth and nutrient cycles.