Articles | Volume 7, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-569-2014
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-569-2014
Model description paper
 | 
04 Apr 2014
Model description paper |  | 04 Apr 2014

Development of a plume-in-grid model for industrial point and volume sources: application to power plant and refinery sources in the Paris region

Y. Kim, C. Seigneur, and O. Duclaux

Related authors

Population exposure to outdoor NO2, black carbon, particle mass, and number concentrations over Paris with multi-scale modelling down to the street scale
Soo-Jin Park, Lya Lugon, Oscar Jacquot, Youngseob Kim, Alexia Baudic, Barbara D’Anna, Ludovico Di Antonio, Claudia Di Biagio, Fabrice Dugay, Olivier Favez, Véronique Ghersi, Aline Gratien, Julien Kammer, Jean-Eudes Petit, Olivier Sanchez, Myrto Valari, Jérémy Vigneron, and Karine Sartelet
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2120,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2120, 2024
Short summary
To what extent is the description of streets important in estimating local air-quality? A case study over Paris
Alexis Squarcioni, Yelva Roustan, Myrto Valari, Youngseob Kim, Karine Sartelet, Lya Lugon, Fabrice Dugay, and Robin Voitot
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1043,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1043, 2024
Short summary
Validation and analysis of the Polair3D v1.11 chemical transport model over Quebec
Shoma Yamanouchi, Shayamilla Mahagammulla Gamage, Sara Torbatian, Jad Zalzal, Laura Minet, Audrey Smargiassi, Ying Liu, Ling Liu, Forood Azargoshasbi, Jinwoong Kim, Youngseob Kim, Daniel Yazgi, and Marianne Hatzopoulou
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3579–3597, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3579-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3579-2024, 2024
Short summary
A two-way coupled regional urban–street network air quality model system for Beijing, China
Tao Wang, Hang Liu, Jie Li, Shuai Wang, Youngseob Kim, Yele Sun, Wenyi Yang, Huiyun Du, Zhe Wang, and Zifa Wang
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 5585–5599, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5585-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5585-2023, 2023
Short summary
Modelling concentration heterogeneities in streets using the street-network model MUNICH
Thibaud Sarica, Alice Maison, Yelva Roustan, Matthias Ketzel, Steen Solvang Jensen, Youngseob Kim, Christophe Chaillou, and Karine Sartelet
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 5281–5303, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5281-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5281-2023, 2023
Short summary

Related subject area

Atmospheric sciences
An updated parameterization of the unstable atmospheric surface layer in the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) modeling system
Prabhakar Namdev, Maithili Sharan, Piyush Srivastava, and Saroj Kanta Mishra
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8093–8114, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8093-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8093-2024, 2024
Short summary
The impact of cloud microphysics and ice nucleation on Southern Ocean clouds assessed with single-column modeling and instrument simulators
Andrew Gettelman, Richard Forbes, Roger Marchand, Chih-Chieh Chen, and Mark Fielding
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8069–8092, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8069-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8069-2024, 2024
Short summary
An updated aerosol simulation in the Community Earth System Model (v2.1.3): dust and marine aerosol emissions and secondary organic aerosol formation
Yujuan Wang, Peng Zhang, Jie Li, Yaman Liu, Yanxu Zhang, Jiawei Li, and Zhiwei Han
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7995–8021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7995-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7995-2024, 2024
Short summary
Exploring ship track spreading rates with a physics-informed Langevin particle parameterization
Lucas A. McMichael, Michael J. Schmidt, Robert Wood, Peter N. Blossey, and Lekha Patel
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7867–7888, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7867-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7867-2024, 2024
Short summary
Do data-driven models beat numerical models in forecasting weather extremes? A comparison of IFS HRES, Pangu-Weather, and GraphCast
Leonardo Olivetti and Gabriele Messori
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7915–7962, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7915-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7915-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Bénassy, M.-F., Bilinska, K., Caluwé, G. D., Ekstrom, L., Leotoing, F., Mares, I., Roberts, P., Smithers, B., White, L., and Post, L.: Optical methods for remote measurement of diffuse VOC}s: their role in the quantification of annual refinery emissions, {CONCAWE report no. 6/08 available at: https://www.concawe.eu/DocShareNoFrame/Common/ GetFile.asp?PortalSource=1856&DocID=15189&mfd=off&pdoc=1 (last access: 1 April 2014), 2008.
Boutahar, J., Lacour, S., Mallet, V., Quélo, D., Roustan, Y., and Sportisse, B.: Development and validation of a fully modular platform for numerical modelling of air pollution: POLAIR, Int. J. Environ. Pollut., 22, 17–28, 2004.
Boylan, J. W. and Russell, A. G.: PM and light extinction model performance metrics, goals, and criteria for three-dimensional air quality models, Atmos. Environ., 40, 4946–4959, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.09.087, 2006.
Cimorelli, A., Perry, S., Venkatram, A., Weil, J., Paine, R., Wilson, R., Lee, R., Peters, W., Brode, R., and Paumier, J. O.: AERMOD: description of model formulation, available at: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/scram/7thconf/aermod/aermod_mfd.pdf (last access: 1 April 2014), 2004.
Cohan, D. S., Hu, Y., and Russell, A. G.: Dependence of ozone sensitivity analysis on grid resolution, Atmos. Environ., 40, 126–135, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.09.031, 2006.
Download