Articles | Volume 6, issue 3
Geosci. Model Dev., 6, 849–859, 2013
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-849-2013
Geosci. Model Dev., 6, 849–859, 2013
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-849-2013

Development and technical paper 22 Jun 2013

Development and technical paper | 22 Jun 2013

Impacts of using spectral nudging on regional climate model RCA4 simulations of the Arctic

P. Berg et al.

Related authors

Earth System Model Evaluation Tool (ESMValTool) v2.0 – diagnostics for extreme events, regional and impact evaluation, and analysis of Earth system models in CMIP
Katja Weigel, Lisa Bock, Bettina K. Gier, Axel Lauer, Mattia Righi, Manuel Schlund, Kemisola Adeniyi, Bouwe Andela, Enrico Arnone, Peter Berg, Louis-Philippe Caron, Irene Cionni, Susanna Corti, Niels Drost, Alasdair Hunter, Llorenç Lledó, Christian Wilhelm Mohr, Aytaç Paçal, Núria Pérez-Zanón, Valeriu Predoi, Marit Sandstad, Jana Sillmann, Andreas Sterl, Javier Vegas-Regidor, Jost von Hardenberg, and Veronika Eyring
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 3159–3184, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3159-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3159-2021, 2021
Short summary
Visualization of radar-observed rainfall for hydrological risk assessment
Jonas Olsson, Peter Berg, and Remco van de Beek
Adv. Sci. Res., 18, 59–64, https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-18-59-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-18-59-2021, 2021
Short summary
HydroGFD3.0 (Hydrological Global Forcing Data): a 25 km global precipitation and temperature data set updated in near-real time
Peter Berg, Fredrik Almén, and Denica Bozhinova
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 1531–1545, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-1531-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-1531-2021, 2021
Short summary
Identifying robust bias adjustment methods for European extreme precipitation in a multi-model pseudo-reality setting
Torben Schmith, Peter Thejll, Peter Berg, Fredrik Boberg, Ole Bøssing Christensen, Bo Christiansen, Jens Hesselbjerg Christensen, Marianne Sloth Madsen, and Christian Steger
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 273–290, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-273-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-273-2021, 2021
Short summary
The accuracy of weather radar in heavy rain: a comparative study for Denmark, the Netherlands, Finland and Sweden
Marc Schleiss, Jonas Olsson, Peter Berg, Tero Niemi, Teemu Kokkonen, Søren Thorndahl, Rasmus Nielsen, Jesper Ellerbæk Nielsen, Denica Bozhinova, and Seppo Pulkkinen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 3157–3188, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-3157-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-3157-2020, 2020
Short summary

Related subject area

Climate and Earth system modeling
Effect of horizontal resolution on the simulation of tropical cyclones in the Chinese Academy of Sciences FGOALS-f3 climate system model
Jinxiao Li, Qing Bao, Yimin Liu, Lei Wang, Jing Yang, Guoxiong Wu, Xiaofei Wu, Bian He, Xiaocong Wang, Xiaoqi Zhang, Yaoxian Yang, and Zili Shen
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 6113–6133, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6113-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6113-2021, 2021
Short summary
Grid-stretching capability for the GEOS-Chem 13.0.0 atmospheric chemistry model
Liam Bindle, Randall V. Martin, Matthew J. Cooper, Elizabeth W. Lundgren, Sebastian D. Eastham, Benjamin M. Auer, Thomas L. Clune, Hongjian Weng, Jintai Lin, Lee T. Murray, Jun Meng, Christoph A. Keller, William M. Putman, Steven Pawson, and Daniel J. Jacob
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 5977–5997, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5977-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5977-2021, 2021
Short summary
Performance of the Adriatic Sea and Coast (AdriSC) climate component – a COAWST V3.3-based one-way coupled atmosphere–ocean modelling suite: ocean results
Petra Pranić, Cléa Denamiel, and Ivica Vilibić
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 5927–5955, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5927-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5927-2021, 2021
Short summary
Validation of terrestrial biogeochemistry in CMIP6 Earth system models: a review
Lynsay Spafford and Andrew H. MacDougall
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 5863–5889, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5863-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5863-2021, 2021
Short summary
FAMOUS version xotzt (FAMOUS-ice): a general circulation model (GCM) capable of energy- and water-conserving coupling to an ice sheet model
Robin S. Smith, Steve George, and Jonathan M. Gregory
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 5769–5787, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5769-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5769-2021, 2021
Short summary

Cited articles

Alexander, M., Bhatt, U., Walsh, J., Timlin, M., Miller, J., and Scott, J.: The atmospheric response to realistic Arctic sea ice anomalies in an AGCM during winter, J. Climate, 17, 890–905, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2004)017<0890:TARTRA>2.0.CO;2, 2004.
Alexandru, A., de Elía, R., Laprise, R., \Separović, L., and Biner, S.: Sensitivity study of regional climate model simulations to large-scale nudging parameters, Mon. Weather Rev., 137, 1666–1686, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008MWR2620.1, 2009.
Bitz, C., Fyfe, J., and Flato, G.: Sea ice response to wind forcing from AMIP models, J. Climate, 15, 522–536, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2002)015<0522:SIRTWF>2.0.CO;2, 2002.
Blanchard-Wrigglesworth, E., Armour, K. C., Bitz, C. M., and DeWeaver, E.: Persistence and Inherent Predictability of Arctic Sea Ice in a GCM Ensemble and Observations, J. Climate, 24, 231–250, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JCLI3775.1, 2011.
Boerhout, J.: Reference HIRLAM scalability optimisation proposal, HIRLAM newsletter, 44, 22 pp., available at: http://www.hirlam.org/publications/NewsLetters/index.html, 2003.
Download