Articles | Volume 4, issue 2
Geosci. Model Dev., 4, 325–355, 2011
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-325-2011

Special issue: The Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy) (ACP/GMD inter-journal...

Geosci. Model Dev., 4, 325–355, 2011
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-325-2011

Model description paper 21 Apr 2011

Model description paper | 21 Apr 2011

MADE-in: a new aerosol microphysics submodel for global simulation of insoluble particles and their mixing state

V. Aquila et al.

Related subject area

Atmospheric Sciences
Implementation of a synthetic inflow turbulence generator in idealised WRF v3.6.1 large eddy simulations under neutral atmospheric conditions
Jian Zhong, Xiaoming Cai, and Zheng-Tong Xie
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 323–336, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-323-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-323-2021, 2021
Short summary
Numerical study of the effects of initial conditions and emissions on PM2.5 concentration simulations with CAMx v6.1: a Xi'an case study
Han Xiao, Qizhong Wu, Xiaochun Yang, Lanning Wang, and Huaqiong Cheng
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 223–238, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-223-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-223-2021, 2021
Short summary
A multi-year short-range hindcast experiment with CESM1 for evaluating climate model moist processes from diurnal to interannual timescales
Hsi-Yen Ma, Chen Zhou, Yunyan Zhang, Stephen A. Klein, Mark D. Zelinka, Xue Zheng, Shaocheng Xie, Wei-Ting Chen, and Chien-Ming Wu
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 73–90, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-73-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-73-2021, 2021
Short summary
Ground-based lidar processing and simulator framework for comparing models and observations (ALCF 1.0)
Peter Kuma, Adrian J. McDonald, Olaf Morgenstern, Richard Querel, Israel Silber, and Connor J. Flynn
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 43–72, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-43-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-43-2021, 2021
Development of an Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) aerosol index (AI) data assimilation scheme for aerosol modeling over bright surfaces – a step toward direct radiance assimilation in the UV spectrum
Jianglong Zhang, Robert J. D. Spurr, Jeffrey S. Reid, Peng Xian, Peter R. Colarco, James R. Campbell, Edward J. Hyer, and Nancy L. Baker
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 27–42, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-27-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-27-2021, 2021
Short summary

Cited articles

Abdul-Razzak, H. and Ghan, S.: A parameterization of aerosol activation, 2. Multiple aerosol types, J. Geophys. Res., 105(D5), 6837–6844, 2000.
Ackermann, I., Hass, H., Memmesheimer, M., Ebel, A., Binkowsky, F., and Shankar, U.: Modal aerosol dynamics model for Europe: development and first applications, Atmos. Environ., 32, 2971–2999, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00006-5, 1998.
Adams, P. J. and Seinfeld, J. H.: {P}redicting global aerosol size distributions in general circulation models, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 4370, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001010, 2002.
Adams, P. J., Seinfeld, J. H., and Koch, D. M.: {G}lobal concentrations of tropospheric sulfate, nitrate, and ammonium aerosol simulated in a general circulation model, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 13791–13823, 1999.
Andreae, M. and Rosenfeld, D.: Aerosol-cloud-precipitation interactions. Part 1, The nature and sources of cloud-active aerosols, Earth-Sci. Rev., 89, 13–41, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2008.03.001, 2008.