Articles | Volume 19, issue 18
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-9131-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-9131-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Model description paper
| 
28 Sep 2026
Model description paper |
| 28 Sep 2026
| 28 Sep 2026
The NASA-GISS ModelE2.1-CC2 ESM: development and evaluation
Anastasia Romanou
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
NASA-Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York City, NY 10025, USA
Department of Applied Physics and Applied Mathematics, Columbia University, New York, NY 10025, USA
Paul Lerner
NASA-Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York City, NY 10025, USA
Department of Applied Physics and Applied Mathematics, Columbia University, New York, NY 10025, USA
Joy Romanski
NASA-Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York City, NY 10025, USA
Autonomic Integra LLC, 6550 Rock Spring Dr., Ste. 600, Bethesda, MD, 20817, USA
Nancy Y. Kiang
NASA-Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York City, NY 10025, USA
Climate Systems Research, Columbia University, New York, NY 10025, USA
Igor Aleinov
Climate Systems Research, Columbia University, New York, NY 10025, USA
Maxwell Kelley
NASA-Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York City, NY 10025, USA
Ron L. Miller
NASA-Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York City, NY 10025, USA
Gary Russell
NASA-Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York City, NY 10025, USA
Reto Ruedy
Autonomic Integra LLC, 6550 Rock Spring Dr., Ste. 600, Bethesda, MD, 20817, USA
Gavin A. Schmidt
NASA-Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York City, NY 10025, USA
Maria Z. Hakuba
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA
Related authors
Vivek K. Arora, Chris D. Jones, Pierre Friedlingstein, Tatiana Ilyina, Guilherme L. Torres Mendonça, Benjamin Sanderson, Charles Koven, Heather Graven, Michio Kawamiya, Victor Brovkin, John Dunne, Forrest M. Hoffman, Julia Pongratz, James T. Randerson, Anastasia Romanou, Sönke Zaehle, and Kirsten Zickfeld
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5533, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5533, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Short summary
Earth system models (ESM) are important tools for understanding how the Earth’s climate and carbon cycle interact, and how Earth system responds to anthropogenic CO2 emissions. The Coupled Climate-Carbon Cycle Model Intercomparison Project (C4MIP) compares Earth system models from around the world in context of climate and carbon cycle interactions. This manuscript describes the new set of experiments for C4MIP for the seventh phase of the coupled modelling intercomparison project (CMIP7).
Charles Koven, Benjamin M. Sanderson, Abigail L. S. Swann, Victor Brovkin, John Dunne, Rosie A. Fisher, Tomohiro Hajima, Chris D. Jones, Spencer K. Liddicoat, Anastasia Romanou, Roland Séférian, Norman J. Steinert, Jerry Tjiputra, Tilo Ziehn, Tatiana Ilyina, Nancy Y. Kiang, David M. Lawrence, Peter Lawrence, Hongmei Li, Jorg Schwinger, and Lori T. Sentman
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5381, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5381, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Earth System Dynamics (ESD).
Short summary
Short summary
We use a set of climate models to ask how aspects of climate beyond global mean temperatures would differ if we first emit, and then remove, a given amount of CO2, compared to a case where the CO2 hadn't been emitted. We show that precipitation increases, and that land cools relative to the ocean. Models disagree on many of the finer-scale regional changes, but they do agree that many of the regional changes that occur under positive and then negative emissions also occur under zero emissions.
Jens Terhaar, Laurent Bopp, Pierre Friedlingstein, Thomas Frölicher, Helene Hollitzer, Tatiana Ilyina, Lester Kwiatkowski, Paul Lerner, Hongmei Li, Anastasia Romanou, Jörg Schwinger, Roland Séférian, and Aaron Wienkers
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5757, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5757, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Biogeosciences (BG).
Short summary
Short summary
The ocean absorbs about 30% of CO2 emissions, but how much it will keep absorbing as CO2 levels rise and the climate warms is highly uncertain. Combining climate models with observations, we show models underestimate both the ocean CO2 uptake with increasing atmospheric CO2 and how strongly this uptake weakens with warming, and that the two are linked. Our tighter estimate reduces uncertainty in how much emitted CO2 stays in the atmosphere, and in the warming caused by future emissions.
Abigail L. S. Swann, Charles D. Koven, Cristian Proistosecu, Rosie A. Fisher, Benjamin M. Sanderson, Victor Brovkin, Tomohiro Hajima, Chris D. Jones, Nancy Y. Kiang, David M. Lawrence, Spencer Liddicoat, Hannah Liddy, Anastasia Romanou, Roland Séférian, Lori T. Sentman, Norman J. Steinert, Jerry Tjiputra, and Tilo Ziehn
Earth Syst. Dynam., 17, 1237–1275, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-17-1237-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-17-1237-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
We analyzed simulations from Earth system models (ESM) with a constant rate of emissions, zero emissions, and negative emissions of CO2 to quantify the response of land carbon sinks. We found that under positive emissions vegetation in the tropics gained carbon. Under zero emissions and negative emissions most ESMs lost carbon from vegetation in the tropics but gained carbon in mid- and high-latitudes, mostly in soils. Our findings imply that tropical carbon is vulnerable under zero emissions.
Colin Jones, Isaline Bossert, Donovan P. Dennis, Hazel A. Jeffery, Chris D. Jones, Torben Koenigk, Sina Loriani, Benjamin Sanderson, Roland Séférian, Klaus Wyser, Shuting Yang, Manabu Abe, Sebastian Bathiany, Pascale Braconnot, Victor Brovkin, Friedrich A. Burger, Patrica Cadule, Frederic S. Castruccio, Gokhan Danabasoglu, Andrea Dittus, Jonathan F. Donges, Friederike Fröb, Thomas L. Frölicher, Goran Georgievski, Chuncheng Guo, Aixue Hu, Peter Lawrence, Paul Lerner, José Licón-Saláiz, Bette Otto-Bliesner, Anastasia Romanou, Elena Shevliakova, Yona Silvy, Didier Swingedouw, Jerry Tjiputra, Jeremy Walton, Andy Wiltshire, Ricarda Winkelmann, Richard Wood, Tokuta Yokohata, and Tilo Ziehn
Geosci. Model Dev., 19, 6941–6966, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-6941-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-6941-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
We introduce a new Earth system model experiment protocol to help researchers understand how Earth might respond to positive, zero, and negative carbon emissions. This protocol enables different models to be compared following similar warming and cooling rates. Researchers use the models to explore how the Earth reacts to different climate futures, including the risk of tipping points being exceeded and whether changes can be reversed. The results will support improved long-term climate policy.
Benjamin M. Sanderson, Marit Sandstad, Alejandro Romero-Prieto, Stuart Jenkins, Charles Koven, Glen Peters, Roland Séfèrian, Andrew H. MacDougall, Ashwin Seshadri, Victor Brovkin, John Dunne, Abigail L. S. Swann, Torben Koenigk, Rosie A. Fisher, David Hohn, Tatiana Ilyina, Chris D. Jones, Hongmei Li, Peter Lawrence, Spencer Liddicoat, Nadine Mengis, Anastasia Romanou, Lori T. Sentman, Chris Smith, Norman J. Steinert, Jerry Tjiputra, and Tilo Ziehn
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1875, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1875, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
When humanity stops emitting carbon dioxide, will temperatures keep rising, stabilize, or fall? Our study reveals in most models, temperatures remain nearly stable, but this hides a balance between the warming in response to radiation imbalance, and the cooling due to uptake of carbon in the land and ocean. Understanding this balance helps refine how much more CO2 we can safely emit.
Didier Swingedouw, Laura Jackson, Aixue Hu, Anastasia Romanou, Nicole C. Laureanti, Wilbert Weijer, Sina Loriani, Bette Otto-Bliesner, Ayako Abe-Ouchi, Lucas Almeida, Alessio Bellucci, Reyk Börner, Gokhan Danabasoglu, Donovan P. Dennis, Marion Devilliers, Sybren Drijfhout, Jonathan Donges, Friederike Fröb, Thomas L. Frölicher, Guillaume Gastineau, Heiko Goelzer, Chuncheng Guo, Urs Hofmann, Anna Höse, Colin Jones, Torben Koenigk, Ann Kristin Klose, Valerio Lembo, Jose Licon-Salaiz, Ken Mankoff, Virna Meccia, Irina Melnikova, Oliver Mehling, Laurie Menviel, Juliette Mignot, Jon I. Robson, Gavin A. Schmidt, Robin Smith, Yuchen Sun, Irene Trombini, Matteo Willeit, Richard Wood, Fanghua Wu, Lin Zhaohui, and Ricarda Winkelmann
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1698, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1698, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
This study presents a plan for climate model experiments to better understand how changes in freshwater in the North Atlantic affect major ocean currents. We designed coordinated simulations to test their response to warming, added freshwater, and possible recovery after weakening. Comparing results across models and past climate evidence helps improve confidence in projections and assess risks of large ocean circulation changes.
Victor Brovkin, Benjamin M. Sanderson, Noel G. Brizuela, Tomohiro Hajima, Tatiana Ilyina, Chris D. Jones, Charles Koven, David Lawrence, Peter Lawrence, Hongmei Li, Spencer Liddcoat, Anastasia Romanou, Roland Séférian, Lori T. Sentman, Abigail L. S. Swann, Jerry Tjiputra, Tilo Ziehn, and Alexander J. Winkler
Earth Syst. Dynam., 16, 2021–2034, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-2021-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-2021-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Idealized experiments with Earth system models provide a basis for understanding the response of the carbon cycle to emissions. We show that most models exhibit a quasi-linear relationship between cumulative carbon uptake on land and in the ocean and hypothesize that this relationship does not depend on emission pathways. We reduce the coupled system to only one differential equation, which represents a powerful simplification of the Earth system dynamics as a function of fossil fuel emissions.
Benjamin M. Sanderson, Victor Brovkin, Rosie A. Fisher, David Hohn, Tatiana Ilyina, Chris D. Jones, Torben Koenigk, Charles Koven, Hongmei Li, David M. Lawrence, Peter Lawrence, Spencer Liddicoat, Andrew H. MacDougall, Nadine Mengis, Zebedee Nicholls, Eleanor O'Rourke, Anastasia Romanou, Marit Sandstad, Jörg Schwinger, Roland Séférian, Lori T. Sentman, Isla R. Simpson, Chris Smith, Norman J. Steinert, Abigail L. S. Swann, Jerry Tjiputra, and Tilo Ziehn
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 5699–5724, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-5699-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-5699-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study investigates how climate models warm in response to simplified carbon emissions trajectories, refining the understanding of climate reversibility and commitment. Metrics are defined for warming response to cumulative emissions and for the cessation of emissions or ramp-down to net-zero and net-negative levels. Results indicate that previous concentration-driven experiments may have overstated the Zero Emissions Commitment due to emissions rates exceeding historical levels.
Ricarda Winkelmann, Donovan P. Dennis, Jonathan F. Donges, Sina Loriani, Ann Kristin Klose, Jesse F. Abrams, Jorge Alvarez-Solas, Torsten Albrecht, David Armstrong McKay, Sebastian Bathiany, Javier Blasco Navarro, Victor Brovkin, Eleanor Burke, Gokhan Danabasoglu, Reik V. Donner, Markus Drüke, Goran Georgievski, Heiko Goelzer, Anna B. Harper, Gabriele Hegerl, Marina Hirota, Aixue Hu, Laura C. Jackson, Colin Jones, Hyungjun Kim, Torben Koenigk, Peter Lawrence, Timothy M. Lenton, Hannah Liddy, José Licón-Saláiz, Maxence Menthon, Marisa Montoya, Jan Nitzbon, Sophie Nowicki, Bette Otto-Bliesner, Francesco Pausata, Stefan Rahmstorf, Karoline Ramin, Alexander Robinson, Johan Rockström, Anastasia Romanou, Boris Sakschewski, Christina Schädel, Steven Sherwood, Robin S. Smith, Norman J. Steinert, Didier Swingedouw, Matteo Willeit, Wilbert Weijer, Richard Wood, Klaus Wyser, and Shuting Yang
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1899, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1899, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The Tipping Points Modelling Intercomparison Project (TIPMIP) is an international collaborative effort to systematically assess tipping point risks in the Earth system using state-of-the-art coupled and stand-alone domain models. TIPMIP will provide a first global atlas of potential tipping dynamics, respective critical thresholds and key uncertainties, generating an important building block towards a comprehensive scientific basis for policy- and decision-making.
Yona Silvy, Thomas L. Frölicher, Jens Terhaar, Fortunat Joos, Friedrich A. Burger, Fabrice Lacroix, Myles Allen, Raffaele Bernardello, Laurent Bopp, Victor Brovkin, Jonathan R. Buzan, Patricia Cadule, Martin Dix, John Dunne, Pierre Friedlingstein, Goran Georgievski, Tomohiro Hajima, Stuart Jenkins, Michio Kawamiya, Nancy Y. Kiang, Vladimir Lapin, Donghyun Lee, Paul Lerner, Nadine Mengis, Estela A. Monteiro, David Paynter, Glen P. Peters, Anastasia Romanou, Jörg Schwinger, Sarah Sparrow, Eric Stofferahn, Jerry Tjiputra, Etienne Tourigny, and Tilo Ziehn
Earth Syst. Dynam., 15, 1591–1628, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-1591-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-1591-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The adaptive emission reduction approach is applied with Earth system models to generate temperature stabilization simulations. These simulations provide compatible emission pathways and budgets for a given warming level, uncovering uncertainty ranges previously missing in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project scenarios. These target-based emission-driven simulations offer a more coherent assessment across models for studying both the carbon cycle and its impacts under climate stabilization.
Vivek K. Arora, Chris D. Jones, Pierre Friedlingstein, Tatiana Ilyina, Guilherme L. Torres Mendonça, Benjamin Sanderson, Charles Koven, Heather Graven, Michio Kawamiya, Victor Brovkin, John Dunne, Forrest M. Hoffman, Julia Pongratz, James T. Randerson, Anastasia Romanou, Sönke Zaehle, and Kirsten Zickfeld
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5533, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5533, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Short summary
Earth system models (ESM) are important tools for understanding how the Earth’s climate and carbon cycle interact, and how Earth system responds to anthropogenic CO2 emissions. The Coupled Climate-Carbon Cycle Model Intercomparison Project (C4MIP) compares Earth system models from around the world in context of climate and carbon cycle interactions. This manuscript describes the new set of experiments for C4MIP for the seventh phase of the coupled modelling intercomparison project (CMIP7).
Mengnan Zhao, Rui Ponte, Ou Wang, Ichiro Fukumori, and Ian Fenty
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4739, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4739, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for The Cryosphere (TC).
Short summary
Short summary
Sea ice thickness plays an important role in the climate system, yet it remains one of the least constrained variables in climate models. Our study evaluates the uncertainties in sea ice data from ICESat-2 and CryoSat-2 missions and concludes that assimilating such sea ice data could substantially improve the sea ice fields being produced under the project for Estimating the Circulation and Climate of the Ocean (ECCO).
Charles Koven, Benjamin M. Sanderson, Abigail L. S. Swann, Victor Brovkin, John Dunne, Rosie A. Fisher, Tomohiro Hajima, Chris D. Jones, Spencer K. Liddicoat, Anastasia Romanou, Roland Séférian, Norman J. Steinert, Jerry Tjiputra, Tilo Ziehn, Tatiana Ilyina, Nancy Y. Kiang, David M. Lawrence, Peter Lawrence, Hongmei Li, Jorg Schwinger, and Lori T. Sentman
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5381, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5381, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Earth System Dynamics (ESD).
Short summary
Short summary
We use a set of climate models to ask how aspects of climate beyond global mean temperatures would differ if we first emit, and then remove, a given amount of CO2, compared to a case where the CO2 hadn't been emitted. We show that precipitation increases, and that land cools relative to the ocean. Models disagree on many of the finer-scale regional changes, but they do agree that many of the regional changes that occur under positive and then negative emissions also occur under zero emissions.
Jens Terhaar, Laurent Bopp, Pierre Friedlingstein, Thomas Frölicher, Helene Hollitzer, Tatiana Ilyina, Lester Kwiatkowski, Paul Lerner, Hongmei Li, Anastasia Romanou, Jörg Schwinger, Roland Séférian, and Aaron Wienkers
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5757, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5757, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Biogeosciences (BG).
Short summary
Short summary
The ocean absorbs about 30% of CO2 emissions, but how much it will keep absorbing as CO2 levels rise and the climate warms is highly uncertain. Combining climate models with observations, we show models underestimate both the ocean CO2 uptake with increasing atmospheric CO2 and how strongly this uptake weakens with warming, and that the two are linked. Our tighter estimate reduces uncertainty in how much emitted CO2 stays in the atmosphere, and in the warming caused by future emissions.
Abigail L. S. Swann, Charles D. Koven, Cristian Proistosecu, Rosie A. Fisher, Benjamin M. Sanderson, Victor Brovkin, Tomohiro Hajima, Chris D. Jones, Nancy Y. Kiang, David M. Lawrence, Spencer Liddicoat, Hannah Liddy, Anastasia Romanou, Roland Séférian, Lori T. Sentman, Norman J. Steinert, Jerry Tjiputra, and Tilo Ziehn
Earth Syst. Dynam., 17, 1237–1275, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-17-1237-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-17-1237-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
We analyzed simulations from Earth system models (ESM) with a constant rate of emissions, zero emissions, and negative emissions of CO2 to quantify the response of land carbon sinks. We found that under positive emissions vegetation in the tropics gained carbon. Under zero emissions and negative emissions most ESMs lost carbon from vegetation in the tropics but gained carbon in mid- and high-latitudes, mostly in soils. Our findings imply that tropical carbon is vulnerable under zero emissions.
Nancy Yao-lan Kiang, Cheuk Yin James Lui, Linda Sohl, and Scott Guzewich
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4262, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4262, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Short summary
Land vegetation's strong effects on climate have changed as plants have evolved and spread. For climate modelers, it is hard to specify vegetation maps for past or future climates. We developed a software tool to conveniently generate maps of vegetation properties for the Jurassic 150 Mya to the future, based on satellite observations in ecosystem-climate classes and replacing modern plants in paleo-climates. The tool predicts vegetation well for climate model simulations of the Cretaceous.
Natalie Mahowald, Hannah Liddy, Jennifer Marlon, Kostas Tsigaridis, Gisela Winckler, Douglas Hamilton, Jasper Kok, Michael Sigl, Jordan Abell, Adwoa Aboagye-Okyere, Joe Adabouk Amooli, Samuel Albani, Susanne Bauer, Emilie Beaudon, Hunter Brown, Nathan Chellman, Nicolás Cosentino, Nathalie Goodkin, Christopher Guiterman, Stijn Hantson, Chengfei He, Aviva Intveld, Jed Kaplan, Jeremy Klavans, Fabrice Lambert, Haobo Liu, Marie-France Loutre, Joe McConnell, Zachary McGraw, Keren Mezuman, Ron Miller, Nicholas O’Mara, Maria Rosabelle Ong, Gavin Schmidt, Richard Vachula, Lily Wu, and Bingqing Zhang
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4532, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4532, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
Short summary
Aerosols are poorly known in past climates, and yet it is very important to understand how aerosols are changing in different climates. In this paper we review available proxy data and modeling approaches to characterize aerosols in past climates. In addition, we propose future studies that can help improve our understanding.
Colin Jones, Isaline Bossert, Donovan P. Dennis, Hazel A. Jeffery, Chris D. Jones, Torben Koenigk, Sina Loriani, Benjamin Sanderson, Roland Séférian, Klaus Wyser, Shuting Yang, Manabu Abe, Sebastian Bathiany, Pascale Braconnot, Victor Brovkin, Friedrich A. Burger, Patrica Cadule, Frederic S. Castruccio, Gokhan Danabasoglu, Andrea Dittus, Jonathan F. Donges, Friederike Fröb, Thomas L. Frölicher, Goran Georgievski, Chuncheng Guo, Aixue Hu, Peter Lawrence, Paul Lerner, José Licón-Saláiz, Bette Otto-Bliesner, Anastasia Romanou, Elena Shevliakova, Yona Silvy, Didier Swingedouw, Jerry Tjiputra, Jeremy Walton, Andy Wiltshire, Ricarda Winkelmann, Richard Wood, Tokuta Yokohata, and Tilo Ziehn
Geosci. Model Dev., 19, 6941–6966, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-6941-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-6941-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
We introduce a new Earth system model experiment protocol to help researchers understand how Earth might respond to positive, zero, and negative carbon emissions. This protocol enables different models to be compared following similar warming and cooling rates. Researchers use the models to explore how the Earth reacts to different climate futures, including the risk of tipping points being exceeded and whether changes can be reversed. The results will support improved long-term climate policy.
Rui M. Ponte, E. Nishchitha S. Silva, Ou Wang, Ichiro Fukumori, and Mengnan Zhao
Ocean Sci., 22, 2179–2196, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-22-2179-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-22-2179-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Ocean bottom pressure (pb) is a key variable for monitoring the ocean circulation, yet global space gravimetry observations offer limited coverage in space and time. Our work examines how to improve estimates of pb by optimally combining information in available data with an ocean circulation model. Results indicate that gravimetry data contain information complementary to that available in other ocean datasets and are thus important for determining variations in pb and related circulations.
Benjamin M. Sanderson, Marit Sandstad, Alejandro Romero-Prieto, Stuart Jenkins, Charles Koven, Glen Peters, Roland Séfèrian, Andrew H. MacDougall, Ashwin Seshadri, Victor Brovkin, John Dunne, Abigail L. S. Swann, Torben Koenigk, Rosie A. Fisher, David Hohn, Tatiana Ilyina, Chris D. Jones, Hongmei Li, Peter Lawrence, Spencer Liddicoat, Nadine Mengis, Anastasia Romanou, Lori T. Sentman, Chris Smith, Norman J. Steinert, Jerry Tjiputra, and Tilo Ziehn
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1875, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1875, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
When humanity stops emitting carbon dioxide, will temperatures keep rising, stabilize, or fall? Our study reveals in most models, temperatures remain nearly stable, but this hides a balance between the warming in response to radiation imbalance, and the cooling due to uptake of carbon in the land and ocean. Understanding this balance helps refine how much more CO2 we can safely emit.
Didier Swingedouw, Laura Jackson, Aixue Hu, Anastasia Romanou, Nicole C. Laureanti, Wilbert Weijer, Sina Loriani, Bette Otto-Bliesner, Ayako Abe-Ouchi, Lucas Almeida, Alessio Bellucci, Reyk Börner, Gokhan Danabasoglu, Donovan P. Dennis, Marion Devilliers, Sybren Drijfhout, Jonathan Donges, Friederike Fröb, Thomas L. Frölicher, Guillaume Gastineau, Heiko Goelzer, Chuncheng Guo, Urs Hofmann, Anna Höse, Colin Jones, Torben Koenigk, Ann Kristin Klose, Valerio Lembo, Jose Licon-Salaiz, Ken Mankoff, Virna Meccia, Irina Melnikova, Oliver Mehling, Laurie Menviel, Juliette Mignot, Jon I. Robson, Gavin A. Schmidt, Robin Smith, Yuchen Sun, Irene Trombini, Matteo Willeit, Richard Wood, Fanghua Wu, Lin Zhaohui, and Ricarda Winkelmann
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1698, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1698, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
This study presents a plan for climate model experiments to better understand how changes in freshwater in the North Atlantic affect major ocean currents. We designed coordinated simulations to test their response to warming, added freshwater, and possible recovery after weakening. Comparing results across models and past climate evidence helps improve confidence in projections and assess risks of large ocean circulation changes.
Thomas Hocking, Linda Megner, Maria Hakuba, and Thorsten Mauritsen
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 19, 1643–1674, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-1643-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-1643-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
The imbalance between the energy the Earth absorbs from the Sun and emits back to space gives rise to climate change, but measuring the small imbalance is challenging. The Earth surface reflects sunlight more in some directions than in others, as with e.g. ocean sunglint. We simulate satellites to investigate how this uneven reflection impacts estimates of the imbalance. We identify orbits that cover all directions well, so that the impact is small.
Ram Singh, Alexander Koch, Allegra N. LeGrande, Kostas Tsigaridis, Riovie D. Ramos, Francis Ludlow, Igor Aleinov, Reto Ruedy, and Jed O. Kaplan
Geosci. Model Dev., 19, 1405–1428, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-1405-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-1405-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
This study presents an experimental framework for asynchronous land-atmosphere coupling to include biogeophysical feedbacks using a dynamic vegetation model with an Earth system model that lacks a fully dynamic vegetation component. The framework is implemented for the 2.5 ka period and also illustrates the role of model performance metrics (bias, variability), while evaluating the simulated climate against the multi-proxy paleoclimate reconstructions.
Peter W. Thorne, John M. Nicklas, John J. Kennedy, Bruce Calvert, Baylor Fox-Kemper, Mark T. Richardson, Adrian Simmons, Ed Hawkins, Robert Rhode, Kathryn Cowtan, Nerilie J. Abram, Axel Andersson, Simon Noone, Phillipe Marbaix, Nathan Lenssen, Dirk Olonscheck, Tristram Walsh, Stephen Outten, Ingo Bethke, Bjorn H. Samset, Chris Smith, Anna Pirani, Jan Fuglestvedt, Lavanya Rajamani, Richard A. Betts, Elizabeth C. Kent, Blair Trewin, Colin Morice, Tim Osborn, Samantha N. Burgess, Oliver Geden, Andrew Parnell, Piers M. Forster, Chris Hewitt, Zeke Hausfather, Valerie Masson-Delmotte, Jochem Marotzke, Nathan Gillett, Sonia I. Seneviratne, Gavin A. Schmidt, Duo Chan, Stefan Brönnimann, Andy Reisinger, Matthew Menne, Maisa Rojas Corradi, Christopher Kadow, Peter Huybers, David B. Stephenson, Emily Wallis, Joeri Rogelj, Andrew Schurer, Karen McKinnon, Panmao Zhai, Fatima Driouech, Wilfran Moufouma Okia, Saeed Vazifehkhah, Sophie Szopa, Christopher J. Merchant, Shoji Hirahara, Masayoshi Ishii, Francois A. Engelbrecht, Qingxiang Li, June-Yi Lee, Alex J. Cannon, Christophe Cassou, Karina von Schuckmann, Amir H. Delju, and Ellie Murtagh
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-825, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-825, 2026
Revised manuscript has not been submitted
Short summary
Short summary
We reassess the basis for determining the present level of long-term global warming. Unbiased estimates of both realised warming and anthropogenic warming are possible that approximate a 20-year retrospective mean. Our resulting estimates of 1.40 [1.23–1.58] °C (realised) and 1.34 [1.18–1.50] °C (anthropogenic) as at end of 2024 highlight the urgency of immediate, far-reaching and sustained climate mitigation actions if we are to meet the long term temperature goal of the Paris Agreement.
Francesco Tubiello, Nidal Ramadan, Giulia Conchedda, Reto Ruedy, Michael Hendrickson, Nathan Lenssen, Cynthia Rosenzweig, and Gavin Schmidt
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-681, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-681, 2026
Preprint under review for ESSD
Short summary
Short summary
We use FAO statistics to develop indicators of exposure for 1961–2024. For each region and year, exposure to temperature change of agriculture—rural population, land use area, harvested area, livestock numbers and production value—was defined as the share of regional aggregates over the total. We computed exposure indicators to ΔT > 1.5 °C and ΔT > 2.0 °C. Results help highlight which regions may be most in need of adaptation preparedness.
Victor Brovkin, Benjamin M. Sanderson, Noel G. Brizuela, Tomohiro Hajima, Tatiana Ilyina, Chris D. Jones, Charles Koven, David Lawrence, Peter Lawrence, Hongmei Li, Spencer Liddcoat, Anastasia Romanou, Roland Séférian, Lori T. Sentman, Abigail L. S. Swann, Jerry Tjiputra, Tilo Ziehn, and Alexander J. Winkler
Earth Syst. Dynam., 16, 2021–2034, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-2021-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-2021-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Idealized experiments with Earth system models provide a basis for understanding the response of the carbon cycle to emissions. We show that most models exhibit a quasi-linear relationship between cumulative carbon uptake on land and in the ocean and hypothesize that this relationship does not depend on emission pathways. We reduce the coupled system to only one differential equation, which represents a powerful simplification of the Earth system dynamics as a function of fossil fuel emissions.
Gavin A. Schmidt, Kenneth D. Mankoff, Jonathan L. Bamber, Clara Burgard, Dustin Carroll, David M. Chandler, Violaine Coulon, Benjamin J. Davison, Matthew H. England, Paul R. Holland, Nicolas C. Jourdain, Qian Li, Juliana M. Marson, Pierre Mathiot, Clive R. McMahon, Twila A. Moon, Ruth Mottram, Sophie Nowicki, Anna Olivé Abelló, Andrew G. Pauling, Thomas Rackow, and Damien Ringeisen
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 8333–8361, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-8333-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-8333-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The impact of increasing mass loss from the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets has not so far been included in historical climate model simulations. This paper describes the protocols and data available for modeling groups to add this anomalous freshwater to their ocean modules to better represent the impacts of these fluxes on ocean circulation, sea ice, salinity and sea level.
Kostas Tsigaridis, Andrew S. Ackerman, Igor Aleinov, Mark A. Chandler, Thomas L. Clune, Christopher M. Colose, Anthony D. Del Genio, Maxwell Kelley, Nancy Y. Kiang, Anthony Leboissetier, Jan P. Perlwitz, Reto A. Ruedy, Gary L. Russell, Linda E. Sohl, Michael J. Way, and Eric T. Wolf
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 5825–5871, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-5825-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-5825-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We present the second generation of ROCKE-3D (Resolving Orbital and Climate Keys of Earth and Extraterrestrial Environments with Dynamics), a generalized three-dimensional model for use in Solar System and exoplanetary simulations of rocky planet climates. We quantify how the different component choices affect model results and discuss strengths and limitations of using each component, together with how one can select which component to use. ROCKE-3D is publicly available, and tutorial sessions are available for the community, greatly facilitating its use by any interested group.
Benjamin M. Sanderson, Victor Brovkin, Rosie A. Fisher, David Hohn, Tatiana Ilyina, Chris D. Jones, Torben Koenigk, Charles Koven, Hongmei Li, David M. Lawrence, Peter Lawrence, Spencer Liddicoat, Andrew H. MacDougall, Nadine Mengis, Zebedee Nicholls, Eleanor O'Rourke, Anastasia Romanou, Marit Sandstad, Jörg Schwinger, Roland Séférian, Lori T. Sentman, Isla R. Simpson, Chris Smith, Norman J. Steinert, Abigail L. S. Swann, Jerry Tjiputra, and Tilo Ziehn
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 5699–5724, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-5699-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-5699-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study investigates how climate models warm in response to simplified carbon emissions trajectories, refining the understanding of climate reversibility and commitment. Metrics are defined for warming response to cumulative emissions and for the cessation of emissions or ramp-down to net-zero and net-negative levels. Results indicate that previous concentration-driven experiments may have overstated the Zero Emissions Commitment due to emissions rates exceeding historical levels.
Xue Feng, Matthew J. Widlansky, Tong Lee, Ou Wang, Magdalena A. Balmaseda, Hao Zuo, Gregory Dusek, William Sweet, and Malte F. Stuecker
Ocean Sci., 21, 1663–1676, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-21-1663-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-21-1663-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Forecasting sea level changes months in advance along the Gulf Coast and East Coast of the United States is challenging. Here, we present a method that uses past ocean states to forecast future sea levels, while assuming no knowledge of how the atmosphere will evolve other than its typical annual cycle near the ocean's surface. Our findings indicate that this method improves sea level outlooks for many locations along the Gulf Coast and East Coast, especially south of Cape Hatteras.
Ricarda Winkelmann, Donovan P. Dennis, Jonathan F. Donges, Sina Loriani, Ann Kristin Klose, Jesse F. Abrams, Jorge Alvarez-Solas, Torsten Albrecht, David Armstrong McKay, Sebastian Bathiany, Javier Blasco Navarro, Victor Brovkin, Eleanor Burke, Gokhan Danabasoglu, Reik V. Donner, Markus Drüke, Goran Georgievski, Heiko Goelzer, Anna B. Harper, Gabriele Hegerl, Marina Hirota, Aixue Hu, Laura C. Jackson, Colin Jones, Hyungjun Kim, Torben Koenigk, Peter Lawrence, Timothy M. Lenton, Hannah Liddy, José Licón-Saláiz, Maxence Menthon, Marisa Montoya, Jan Nitzbon, Sophie Nowicki, Bette Otto-Bliesner, Francesco Pausata, Stefan Rahmstorf, Karoline Ramin, Alexander Robinson, Johan Rockström, Anastasia Romanou, Boris Sakschewski, Christina Schädel, Steven Sherwood, Robin S. Smith, Norman J. Steinert, Didier Swingedouw, Matteo Willeit, Wilbert Weijer, Richard Wood, Klaus Wyser, and Shuting Yang
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1899, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1899, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The Tipping Points Modelling Intercomparison Project (TIPMIP) is an international collaborative effort to systematically assess tipping point risks in the Earth system using state-of-the-art coupled and stand-alone domain models. TIPMIP will provide a first global atlas of potential tipping dynamics, respective critical thresholds and key uncertainties, generating an important building block towards a comprehensive scientific basis for policy- and decision-making.
Natalie M. Mahowald, Longlei Li, Julius Vira, Marje Prank, Douglas S. Hamilton, Hitoshi Matsui, Ron L. Miller, P. Louis Lu, Ezgi Akyuz, Daphne Meidan, Peter Hess, Heikki Lihavainen, Christine Wiedinmyer, Jenny Hand, Maria Grazia Alaimo, Célia Alves, Andres Alastuey, Paulo Artaxo, Africa Barreto, Francisco Barraza, Silvia Becagli, Giulia Calzolai, Shankararaman Chellam, Ying Chen, Patrick Chuang, David D. Cohen, Cristina Colombi, Evangelia Diapouli, Gaetano Dongarra, Konstantinos Eleftheriadis, Johann Engelbrecht, Corinne Galy-Lacaux, Cassandra Gaston, Dario Gomez, Yenny González Ramos, Roy M. Harrison, Chris Heyes, Barak Herut, Philip Hopke, Christoph Hüglin, Maria Kanakidou, Zsofia Kertesz, Zbigniew Klimont, Katriina Kyllönen, Fabrice Lambert, Xiaohong Liu, Remi Losno, Franco Lucarelli, Willy Maenhaut, Beatrice Marticorena, Randall V. Martin, Nikolaos Mihalopoulos, Yasser Morera-Gómez, Adina Paytan, Joseph Prospero, Sergio Rodríguez, Patricia Smichowski, Daniela Varrica, Brenna Walsh, Crystal L. Weagle, and Xi Zhao
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 4665–4702, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-4665-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-4665-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Aerosol particles are an important part of the Earth system, but their concentrations are spatially and temporally heterogeneous, as well as being variable in size and composition. Here, we present a new compilation of PM2.5 and PM10 aerosol observations, focusing on the spatial variability across different observational stations, including composition, and demonstrate a method for comparing the data sets to model output.
Yona Silvy, Thomas L. Frölicher, Jens Terhaar, Fortunat Joos, Friedrich A. Burger, Fabrice Lacroix, Myles Allen, Raffaele Bernardello, Laurent Bopp, Victor Brovkin, Jonathan R. Buzan, Patricia Cadule, Martin Dix, John Dunne, Pierre Friedlingstein, Goran Georgievski, Tomohiro Hajima, Stuart Jenkins, Michio Kawamiya, Nancy Y. Kiang, Vladimir Lapin, Donghyun Lee, Paul Lerner, Nadine Mengis, Estela A. Monteiro, David Paynter, Glen P. Peters, Anastasia Romanou, Jörg Schwinger, Sarah Sparrow, Eric Stofferahn, Jerry Tjiputra, Etienne Tourigny, and Tilo Ziehn
Earth Syst. Dynam., 15, 1591–1628, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-1591-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-1591-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The adaptive emission reduction approach is applied with Earth system models to generate temperature stabilization simulations. These simulations provide compatible emission pathways and budgets for a given warming level, uncovering uncertainty ranges previously missing in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project scenarios. These target-based emission-driven simulations offer a more coherent assessment across models for studying both the carbon cycle and its impacts under climate stabilization.
Yoshihiro Nakayama, Alena Malyarenko, Hong Zhang, Ou Wang, Matthis Auger, Yafei Nie, Ian Fenty, Matthew Mazloff, Armin Köhl, and Dimitris Menemenlis
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8613–8638, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8613-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8613-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Global- and basin-scale ocean reanalyses are becoming easily accessible. However, such ocean reanalyses are optimized for their entire model domains and their ability to simulate the Southern Ocean requires evaluation. We conduct intercomparison analyses of Massachusetts Institute of Technology General Circulation Model (MITgcm)-based ocean reanalyses. They generally perform well for the open ocean, but open-ocean temporal variability and Antarctic continental shelves require improvements.
Qianqian Song, Paul Ginoux, María Gonçalves Ageitos, Ron L. Miller, Vincenzo Obiso, and Carlos Pérez García-Pando
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 7421–7446, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-7421-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-7421-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We implement and simulate the distribution of eight dust minerals in the GFDL AM4.0 model. We found that resolving the eight minerals reduces dust absorption compared to the homogeneous dust used in the standard GFDL AM4.0 model that assumes a globally uniform hematite content of 2.7 % by volume. Resolving dust mineralogy results in significant impacts on radiation, land surface temperature, surface winds, and precipitation over North Africa in summer.
Vincenzo Obiso, María Gonçalves Ageitos, Carlos Pérez García-Pando, Jan P. Perlwitz, Gregory L. Schuster, Susanne E. Bauer, Claudia Di Biagio, Paola Formenti, Kostas Tsigaridis, and Ron L. Miller
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 5337–5367, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-5337-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-5337-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We calculate the dust direct radiative effect (DRE) in an Earth system model accounting for regionally varying soil mineralogy through a new observationally constrained method. Linking dust absorption at solar wavelengths to the varying amount of specific minerals (i.e., iron oxides) improves the modeled range of dust single scattering albedo compared to observations and increases the global cooling by dust. Our results may contribute to improved estimates of the dust DRE and its climate impact.
Natalie M. Mahowald, Longlei Li, Julius Vira, Marje Prank, Douglas S. Hamilton, Hitoshi Matsui, Ron L. Miller, Louis Lu, Ezgi Akyuz, Daphne Meidan, Peter Hess, Heikki Lihavainen, Christine Wiedinmyer, Jenny Hand, Maria Grazia Alaimo, Célia Alves, Andres Alastuey, Paulo Artaxo, Africa Barreto, Francisco Barraza, Silvia Becagli, Giulia Calzolai, Shankarararman Chellam, Ying Chen, Patrick Chuang, David D. Cohen, Cristina Colombi, Evangelia Diapouli, Gaetano Dongarra, Konstantinos Eleftheriadis, Corinne Galy-Lacaux, Cassandra Gaston, Dario Gomez, Yenny González Ramos, Hannele Hakola, Roy M. Harrison, Chris Heyes, Barak Herut, Philip Hopke, Christoph Hüglin, Maria Kanakidou, Zsofia Kertesz, Zbiginiw Klimont, Katriina Kyllönen, Fabrice Lambert, Xiaohong Liu, Remi Losno, Franco Lucarelli, Willy Maenhaut, Beatrice Marticorena, Randall V. Martin, Nikolaos Mihalopoulos, Yasser Morera-Gomez, Adina Paytan, Joseph Prospero, Sergio Rodríguez, Patricia Smichowski, Daniela Varrica, Brenna Walsh, Crystal Weagle, and Xi Zhao
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-1, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-1, 2024
Preprint withdrawn
Short summary
Short summary
Aerosol particles can interact with incoming solar radiation and outgoing long wave radiation, change cloud properties, affect photochemistry, impact surface air quality, and when deposited impact surface albedo of snow and ice, and modulate carbon dioxide uptake by the land and ocean. Here we present a new compilation of aerosol observations including composition, a methodology for comparing the datasets to model output, and show the implications of these results using one model.
Tiehan Zhou, Kevin J. DallaSanta, Clara Orbe, David H. Rind, Jeffrey A. Jonas, Larissa Nazarenko, Gavin A. Schmidt, and Gary Russell
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 509–532, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-509-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-509-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) tends to speed up and slow down the phase speed of the Quasi-Biennial Oscillation (QBO) during El Niño and La Niña, respectively. The ENSO modulation of the QBO does not show up in the climate models with parameterized but temporally constant gravity wave sources. We show that the GISS E2.2 models can capture the observed ENSO modulation of the QBO period with a horizontal resolution of 2° by 2.5° and its gravity wave sources parameterized interactively.
Jake J. Gristey, K. Sebastian Schmidt, Hong Chen, Daniel R. Feldman, Bruce C. Kindel, Joshua Mauss, Mathew van den Heever, Maria Z. Hakuba, and Peter Pilewskie
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 3609–3630, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-3609-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-3609-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The concept of a satellite-based camera is demonstrated for sampling the angular distribution of outgoing radiance from Earth needed to generate data products for new radiation budget spectral channels.
María Gonçalves Ageitos, Vincenzo Obiso, Ron L. Miller, Oriol Jorba, Martina Klose, Matt Dawson, Yves Balkanski, Jan Perlwitz, Sara Basart, Enza Di Tomaso, Jerónimo Escribano, Francesca Macchia, Gilbert Montané, Natalie M. Mahowald, Robert O. Green, David R. Thompson, and Carlos Pérez García-Pando
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 8623–8657, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-8623-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-8623-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Dust aerosols affect our climate differently depending on their mineral composition. We include dust mineralogy in an atmospheric model considering two existing soil maps, which still have large associated uncertainties. The soil data and the distribution of the minerals in different aerosol sizes are key to our model performance. We find significant regional variations in climate-relevant variables, which supports including mineralogy in our current models and the need for improved soil maps.
Karina von Schuckmann, Audrey Minière, Flora Gues, Francisco José Cuesta-Valero, Gottfried Kirchengast, Susheel Adusumilli, Fiammetta Straneo, Michaël Ablain, Richard P. Allan, Paul M. Barker, Hugo Beltrami, Alejandro Blazquez, Tim Boyer, Lijing Cheng, John Church, Damien Desbruyeres, Han Dolman, Catia M. Domingues, Almudena García-García, Donata Giglio, John E. Gilson, Maximilian Gorfer, Leopold Haimberger, Maria Z. Hakuba, Stefan Hendricks, Shigeki Hosoda, Gregory C. Johnson, Rachel Killick, Brian King, Nicolas Kolodziejczyk, Anton Korosov, Gerhard Krinner, Mikael Kuusela, Felix W. Landerer, Moritz Langer, Thomas Lavergne, Isobel Lawrence, Yuehua Li, John Lyman, Florence Marti, Ben Marzeion, Michael Mayer, Andrew H. MacDougall, Trevor McDougall, Didier Paolo Monselesan, Jan Nitzbon, Inès Otosaka, Jian Peng, Sarah Purkey, Dean Roemmich, Kanako Sato, Katsunari Sato, Abhishek Savita, Axel Schweiger, Andrew Shepherd, Sonia I. Seneviratne, Leon Simons, Donald A. Slater, Thomas Slater, Andrea K. Steiner, Toshio Suga, Tanguy Szekely, Wim Thiery, Mary-Louise Timmermans, Inne Vanderkelen, Susan E. Wjiffels, Tonghua Wu, and Michael Zemp
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 1675–1709, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-1675-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-1675-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Earth's climate is out of energy balance, and this study quantifies how much heat has consequently accumulated over the past decades (ocean: 89 %, land: 6 %, cryosphere: 4 %, atmosphere: 1 %). Since 1971, this accumulated heat reached record values at an increasing pace. The Earth heat inventory provides a comprehensive view on the status and expectation of global warming, and we call for an implementation of this global climate indicator into the Paris Agreement’s Global Stocktake.
Ensheng Weng, Igor Aleinov, Ram Singh, Michael J. Puma, Sonali S. McDermid, Nancy Y. Kiang, Maxwell Kelley, Kevin Wilcox, Ray Dybzinski, Caroline E. Farrior, Stephen W. Pacala, and Benjamin I. Cook
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 8153–8180, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8153-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8153-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We develop a demographic vegetation model to improve the representation of terrestrial vegetation dynamics and ecosystem biogeochemical cycles in the Goddard Institute for Space Studies ModelE. The individual-based competition for light and soil resources makes the modeling of eco-evolutionary optimality possible. This model will enable ModelE to simulate long-term biogeophysical and biogeochemical feedbacks between the climate system and land ecosystems at decadal to centurial temporal scales.
Elizabeth Klovenski, Yuxuan Wang, Susanne E. Bauer, Kostas Tsigaridis, Greg Faluvegi, Igor Aleinov, Nancy Y. Kiang, Alex Guenther, Xiaoyan Jiang, Wei Li, and Nan Lin
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 13303–13323, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13303-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13303-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Severe drought stresses vegetation and causes reduced emission of isoprene. We study the impact of including a new isoprene drought stress (yd) parameterization in NASA GISS ModelE called DroughtStress_ModelE, which is specifically tuned for ModelE. Inclusion of yd leads to better simulated isoprene emissions at the MOFLUX site during the severe drought of 2012, reduced overestimation of OMI satellite ΩHCHO (formaldehyde column), and improved simulated O3 (ozone) during drought.
Martina Klose, Oriol Jorba, María Gonçalves Ageitos, Jeronimo Escribano, Matthew L. Dawson, Vincenzo Obiso, Enza Di Tomaso, Sara Basart, Gilbert Montané Pinto, Francesca Macchia, Paul Ginoux, Juan Guerschman, Catherine Prigent, Yue Huang, Jasper F. Kok, Ron L. Miller, and Carlos Pérez García-Pando
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 6403–6444, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6403-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6403-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Mineral soil dust is a major atmospheric airborne particle type. We present and evaluate MONARCH, a model used for regional and global dust-weather prediction. An important feature of the model is that it allows different approximations to represent dust, ranging from more simplified to more complex treatments. Using these different treatments, MONARCH can help us better understand impacts of dust in the Earth system, such as its interactions with radiation.
Cited articles
Abramopoulos, F., Rosenzweig, C., and Choudhury, B. J.: Improved ground hydrology calculations for global climate models (GCMs): soil water movement and evapotranspiration, J. Climate, 1, 921–941, 1988.
Adebiyi, A. A. and Kok, J. F.: Climate models miss most of the coarse dust in the atmosphere, Sci. Adv., 6, eaaz9507, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaz9507, 2020.
Agawin, N. S., Duarte, C. M., and Agustí, S.: Nutrient and temperature control of the contribution of picoplankton to phytoplankton biomass and production, Limnol. Oceanogr., 45, 591–600, https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2000.45.3.0591, 2000.
Anav, A., Friedlingstein, P., Beer, C., Ciais, P., Harper, A., Jones, C., Murray-Tortarolo, G., Papale, D., Parazoo, N. C., Peylin, P., Piao, S., Sitch, S., Viovy, N., Wiltshire, A., Zhao, M., Allen, R. J., Buchwitz, M., Guanter, L., Hantson, S., and Ichii, K.: Spatiotemporal patterns of terrestrial gross primary production: A review, Rev. Geophys., 53, 785–818, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015RG000483, 2015.
Armstrong, R. A., Lee, C., Hedges, J. I., Honjo, S., and Wakeham, S. G.: A new, mechanistic model for organic carbon fluxes in the ocean based on the quantitative association of POC with ballast minerals, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 49, 219–236, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0645(01)00101-1, 2001
Atwood, T. B., Romanou, A., DeVries, T., Lerner, P., Mayorga, J. S., Bradley, D., Cabral, R. B., Schmidt, G. A., and Sala, E.: Atmospheric CO2 emissions and ocean acidification from bottom-trawling, Front. Mar. Sci., 10, 1125137, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2023.1125137, 2024.
Aumont, O., Ethé, C., Tagliabue, A., Bopp, L., and Gehlen, M.: PISCES-v2: an ocean biogeochemical model for carbon and ecosystem studies, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 2465–2513, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2465-2015, 2015.
Ball, J. T. and Berry, J. A.: A model predicting stomatal conductance and its contribution to photosynthesis under different environmental conditions. Progress in Photosynthesis Research. I, Biggins, Nijhoff, Dordrecht, Netherlands, IV, 110–112, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0519-6_48, 1987.
Bastos, A., Sullivan, M., Ciais, P., Makowski, D., Sitch, S., Friedlingstein, P., Chevalier, F., Rodenbeck, C., Pongratz, J., Luijkx, I., Patra, P., Peylin, P., Canadell, J., Lauerwald, R., Li, W., Smith, N., Peters, W., Goll, D., Jain, A., Kato, E., Lienert, S., Lombardozzi, D., Haverd, V., Nabel, J., Tian, H., Walker, A., and Zaehle, S.: Aggregated regional estimates of net atmosphere-land CO2 fluxes from the five atmospheric inversions and 16 Dynamic Global Vegetation Models, supplemental data to Bastos et al., 2019 (https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GB006393), Integrated Carbon Observation System [data set], https://doi.org/10.18160/1SVH-3DNB, 2020.
Batjes, N. H.: Total carbon and nitrogen in the soils of the world, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 47, 151–163, 1996.
Berger, A. L.: Long-Term Variations of Daily Insolation and Quaternary Climatic Changes. J. Atmos. Sci., 35, 2362–2367, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1978)035<2362:LTVODI>2.0.CO;2, 1978.
Bauer, S. E., Wright, D. L., Koch, D., Lewis, E. R., McGraw, R., Chang, L.-S., Schwartz, S. E., and Ruedy, R.: MATRIX (Multiconfiguration Aerosol TRacker of mIXing state): an aerosol microphysical module for global atmospheric models, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 6003–6035, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-6003-2008, 2008.
Bissinger, J. E., Montagnes, D. J., Harples, J., and Atkinson, D.: Predicting marine phytoplankton maximum growth rates from temperature: Improving on the Eppley curve using quantile regression, Limnol. Oceanogr., 53, 487–493, https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2008.53.2.0487, 2008.
Bitz, C. M. and Lipscomb, W. H.: An energy-conserving thermodynamic model of sea ice. J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 104, 15669–15677, https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JC900100, 1999.
Brutsaert, W.: Evaporation into the Atmosphere: Theory, History, and Applications, Springer, Dordrecht, 299 pp., https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1497-6, 1982.
Buitenhuis, E. T., Pangerc, T., Franklin, D. J., Le Quéré, C., and Malin, G.: Growth rates of six coccolithophorid strains as a function of temperature, Limnol. Oceanogr., 53, 1181–1185, 2008.
Burd, A. B.: Modeling particle aggregation using size class and size spectrum approaches, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 118, 3431–3443, https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrc.20255, 2013.
Cairns, B., Lacis, A. A., and Carlson, B. E.: Absorption within Inhomogeneous Clouds and Its Parameterization in General Circulation Models. J. Atmos. Sci., 57, 700–714, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2000)057<0700:AWICAI>2.0.CO;2, 2000.
Cakmur, R. V., Miller, R. L., and Torres, O.: Incorporating the effect of small scale circulations upon dust emission in an AGCM, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D07201, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD004067, 2004.
Canadell, J. G., Monteiro, P. M. S., Costa, M. H., Cotrim da Cunha, L., Cox, P. M., Eliseev, A. V., Henson, S., Ishii, M., Jaccard, S., Koven, C., Lohila, A., Patra, P. K., Piao, S., Rogelj, J., Syampungani, S., Zaehle, S., and Zickfeld, K.: Global Carbon and Other Biogeochemical Cycles and Feedbacks, in: Climate Change 2021 – The Physical Science Basis: Working Group I Contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Pirani, A., Connors, S. L., Péan, C., Berger, S., Caud, N., Chen, Y., Goldfarb, L., Gomis, M. I., Huang, M., Leitzell, K., Lonnoy, E., Matthews, J. B. R., Maycock, T. K., Waterfield, T., Yelekçi, O., Yu, R., and Zhou, B., (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 673–816, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896.007, 2021.
Canuto, V. M. and Dubovikov, M. S.: A dynamical model for turbulence. I. General formalism, Phys. Fluids, 8, 571–585, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.868842, 1996a.
Canuto, V. M. and Dubovikov, M. S.: A dynamical model for turbulence. II. Shear-driven flows, Phys. Fluids, 8, 587-598, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.868843, 1996b.
Caprara, S., Buck, K. N., Gerringa, L. J., Rijkenberg, M. J., and Monticelli, D.: A compilation of iron speciation data for open oceanic waters, Front. Mar. Sci., 3, 221, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2016.00221, 2016.
Castellanos, P., Colarco, P., Espinosa, W. R., Guzewich, S. D., Levy, R. C., Miller, R. L., Chin, M., Kahn, R. A., Kemppinen, O., Moosmüller, H., Nowottnick, E. P., Rocha-Lima, A., Smith, M. D., Yorks, J. E., and Yu, H.: Mineral dust optical properties for remote sensing and global modeling: A review, Remote Sens. Environ., 303, 113982, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2023.113982, 2024.
Chen, C.-T. and Millero, F. J.: The specific volume of seawater at high pressures, Deep-Sea Res., 23, 595–612, 1976.
Cheng, L., Zhang, L., Wang, Y.-P., Canadell, J. G., Chiew, F. H. S., Beringer, J., Li, L., Miralles, D. G., Piao, S., and Zhang, Y.: Recent increases in terrestrial carbon uptake at little cost to the water cycle, Nat. Commun., 8, 110, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-00114-5, 2017.
Cheng, Y., Canuto, V. M., and Howard, A. M.: An improved model for the turbulent PBL. J. Atmos. Sci., 59, 1550–1565, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059<1550:AIMFTT>2.0.co;2, 2002.
Coddington, O., Lean, J. L, Pilewskie, P., Snow, M., and Lindholm, D.: A Solar Irradiance Climate Data Record, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 97, 1265–1282, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00265.1, 2016.
Collatz, G. J., Ball, J. T., Grivet, C., and Berry, J. A.: Physiological and environmental regulation of stomatal conductance, photosynthesis and transpiration: a model that includes a laminar boundary layer, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 54, 107–136, 1991.
Collatz, M.-R. C. and Berry, J. A.: Coupled Photosynthesis-Stomatal Conductance Model for Leaves of C4 Plants, Austr. J. Plant Physiol., 19, 519–538, https://doi.org/10.1071/PP9920519, 1992.
Cook, B. I., Puma, M. J., and Krakauer, N. Y.: Irrigation induced surface cooling in the context of modern and increased greenhouse gas forcing, Clim. Dynam., 37, 1587–1600, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-010-0932-x, 2011.
Cook, B. I., Smerdon, J. E., Seager, R., and Coats, S.: Global warming and 21st century drying, Clim. Dynam., 43, 2607–2627, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-014-2075-y, 2014.
Cox, C. and Munk, W.: Slopes of the sea surface deduced from photographs of sun glitter, Bull. Scripps Inst. Oceanogr., 6, 401–488, 1956.
da Cunha, L. C., Buitenhuis, E. T., Le Quéré, C., Giraud, X., and Ludwig, W.: Potential impact of changes in river nutrient supply on global ocean biogeochemistry, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 21, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GB002718, 2007.
Dale, A. W., Sommer, S., Ryabenko, E., Noffke, A., Bohlen, L., Wallmann, K., Stolpovsky, K., Greinert J., and Pfannkuche, O.: Benthic nitrogen fluxes and fractionation of nitrate in the Mauritanian oxygen minimum zone (Eastern Tropical North Atlantic), Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 134, 234–256, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2014.02.026, 2014.
DeVries, T.: The oceanic anthropogenic CO2 sink: Storage, air-sea fluxes, and transports over the industrial era, Global Biogeochem. Cy. 28, 631–647, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013GB004739, 2014.
Doney, S. C., Lindsay, K., Fung, I., and John, J.: Natural variability in a stable, 1000-yr global coupled climate-carbon cycle simulation, J. Climate, 19, 3033–3052, 2006.
Dubayah, R. O., Blair, J. B., Goetz, S., Fatoyinbo, L., Hansen, M., Healey, S., Hofton, M., Hurtt, G., Kellner, J., Luthcke, S., Armston, J., Tang, H., Duncanson, L., Hancock, S., Jantz, P., Marselis, S., Patterson, P. L., Qi, W., and Silva, C.: The Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation: High-resolution laser ranging of the Earth's forests and topography, Sci. Remote Sens., 1, 100002, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srs.2020.100002, 2020.
Dubayah, R. O., Armston, J., Healey, S. P., Yang, Z., Patterson, P. L., Saarela, S., Stahl, G., Duncanson, L., and Kellner, J. R.: GEDI L4B Gridded Aboveground Biomass Density, Version 2, ORNL DAAC, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA [data set], https://doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/2017, 2022.
Erb, K. H., Kastner, T., Plutzar, C., Bais, A. L. S., Carvalhais, N., Fetzel, T., Gingrich, S., Haberl, H., Lauk, C., Niedertscheider, M., Pongratz, J., Thurner, M., and Luyssaert, S.: Unexpectedly large impact of forest management and grazing on global vegetation biomass, Nature, 553, 73–76, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature25138, 2018.
Farquhar, G. D. and von Caemmerer, S.: Modelling of Photosynthetic Response to Environmental Conditions, in: Physiological Plant Ecology II: Water Relations and Carbon Assimilation, edited by: Lange, O. L., Nobel, P. S., Osmond, C. B., and Ziegler, H., Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 549–587, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-68150-9_17, 1982.
Finkel, Z. V., Beardall, J., Flynn, K. J., Quigg, A., Rees, T. A. V., and Raven, J. A.: Phytoplankton in a changing world: cell size and elemental stoichiometry, J. Plank. Res., 32, 119–137, https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fbp098, 2010.
Forget, G., Campin, J.-M., Heimbach, P., Hill, C. N., Ponte, R. M., and Wunsch, C.: ECCO version 4: an integrated framework for non-linear inverse modeling and global ocean state estimation, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 3071–3104, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-3071-2015, 2015.
Fukumori, I., Wang, O., Fenty, I., Forget, G., Heimbach, P., and Ponte, R. M.: Synopsis of the ECCO Central Production Global Ocean and Sea-Ice State Estimate (Version 4 Release 4), Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4533349, 2021.
Fung, I. Y., Meyn, S. K., Tegen, I., Doney, S. C., John, J. G., and Bishop, J. K. B.: Iron supply and demand in the upper ocean, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 14, 281–296, https://doi.org/10.1029/1999GB900059, 2000.
Garcia, H. E. and Gordon, L. I.: Oxygen solubility in seawater: Better fitting equations, Limnol. Oceanogr., 37, 1307–1312, https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1992.37.6.1307, 1992.
Gao, F., Morisette, J. T., Wolfe, R. E., Ederer, G., Pedelty, J., Masuoka, E., Myneni, R., Tan, B. M., and Nightingale, J.: An algorithm to produce temporally and spatially continuous MODIS-LAI time series, IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett., 5, 60–64, https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2007.907971, 2008.
Geider, R. J., MacIntyre H. L., and Kana, T. M.: A dynamic regulatory model of phytoplanktonic acclimation to light, nutrients, and temperature, Limnol. Oceanogr., 43, 679–694, 1998.
Gelaro, R., McCarty, W., Suárez, M. J., Todling, R., Molod, A., Takacs, L., Randles, C. A., Darmenov, A., Bosilovich, M. G., Reichle, R., Wargan, K., Coy, L., Cullather, R., Draper, C., Akella, S., Buchard, V., Conaty, A., da Silva, A. M., Gu, W., Kim, G.-K., Koster, R., Lucchesi, R., Merkova, D., Nielsen, J. E., Partyka, G., Pawson, S., Putman, W., Rienecker, M., Schubert, S. D., Sienkiewicz, M., and Zhao, B.: The Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications, Version 2 (MERRA-2), J. Climate, 30, 5419–5454, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0758.1, 2017.
Gidden, M. J., Riahi, K., Smith, S. J., Fujimori, S., Luderer, G., Kriegler, E., van Vuuren, D. P., van den Berg, M., Feng, L., Klein, D., Calvin, K., Doelman, J. C., Frank, S., Fricko, O., Harmsen, M., Hasegawa, T., Havlik, P., Hilaire, J., Hoesly, R., Horing, J., Popp, A., Stehfest, E., and Takahashi, K.: Global emissions pathways under different socioeconomic scenarios for use in CMIP6: a dataset of harmonized emissions trajectories through the end of the century, Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 1443–1475, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1443-2019, 2019.
Gill, A. E.: Atmosphere-Ocean Dynamics, Academic Press, 662 pp., 662 pp., ISBN 10 0-12-283520-4, 1982.
GISTEMP Team: GISS Surface Temperature Analysis (GISTEMP), version 4. NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, https://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/ (last access: 28 September 2025), 2025.
Gordon, H. R. and Jacobs, M. M.: Albedo of the ocean–atmosphere system: influence of sea foam, Appl. Optics, 16, 2257–2260, https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.16.002257, 1977.
Grant, I., Ni-Meister, W., and Kiang, N. Y.: Multiscale analysis of global variation in tree allometric relationships: parameter sets for global vegetation models, Environ. Res.-Ecol., 4, 035002, https://doi.org/10.1088/2752-664X/add7e3, 2025.
Grant, S. R., Bienfang, P. K., and Laws, E. A.: Steady‐state bioassay approach applied to phosphorus‐limited continuous cultures: A growth study of the marine chlorophyte Dunaliella salina, Limnol. Oceanogr., 58, 314–324, 2013.
Gregg, W. W. and Casey, N. W.: Modeling coccolithophores in the global oceans, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 54, 447–477, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2006.12.007, 2007.
Gregg, W. W. and Conkright, M. E.: Decadal changes in global ocean chlorophyll, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29, 201–204, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL014689, 2002.
Griffies, S. M.: The Gent–McWilliams Skew Flux, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 28, 831–841, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1998)028<0831:TGMSF>2.0.co;2, 1998a.
Griffies, S. M., Gnanadesikan, A., Pacanowski, R. C., Larichev, V. D., Dukowicz, J. K., and Smith, R. D.: Isoneutral Diffusion in a z-Coordinate Ocean Model, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 28, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1998)028<0805:IDIAZC>2.0.co;2, 1998b.
Hajima, T., Kawamiya, M., Ito, A., Tachiiri, K., Jones, C. D., Arora, V., Brovkin, V., Séférian, R., Liddicoat, S., Friedlingstein, P., and Shevliakova, E.: Consistency of global carbon budget between concentration- and emission-driven historical experiments simulated by CMIP6 Earth system models and suggestions for improved simulation of CO2 concentration, Biogeosciences, 22, 1447–1473, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-1447-2025, 2025.
Hanninen, H. and Kramer, K.: A framework for modelling the annual cycle of trees in boreal and temperate regions, Silva Fenn., 41, 167–205, 2007.
Hansen, J., Russell, G., Rind, D., Stone, P., Lacis, A., Lebedeff, S., Ruedy, R., and Travis, L.: Efficient three-dimensional global models for climate studies: Models I and II, Mon. Weather Rev., 111, 609–662, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1983)111<0609:ETDGMF>2.0.co;2, 1983.
Hansen, J., Sato, M., Ruedy, R., Kharecha, P., Lacis, A., Miller, R., Nazarenko, L., Lo, K., Schmidt, G. A., Russell, G., Aleinov, I., Bauer, S., Baum, E., Cairns, B., Canuto, V., Chandler, M., Cheng, Y., Cohen, A., del Genio, A., and Zhang, S.: Climate simulations for 1880-2003 with GISS ModelE, Clim. Dynam., 29, 661–696, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-007-0255-8, 2007.
Hartke, G. J. and Rind, D.: Improved surface and boundary layer models for the Goddard Institute for Space Studies general circulation model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 102, 16407–16422, https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD00698, 1997.
Heavens, N. G., Ward, D. S., and Mahowald, N. M.: Studying and Projecting Climate Change with Earth System Models, Nature Education Knowledge, 4, https://www.nature.com/scitable/knowledge/library/studying-and-projecting-climate-change-with-earth-103087065/ (last access: 21 August 2026), 2013.
Hegarty, T. W.: Temperature Coefficient (Q10), Seed Germination and Other Biological Processes, Nature, 243, 305–306, 1973.
Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Biavati, G., Horányi, A., Muñoz Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Rozum, I., Schepers, D., Simmons, A., Soci, C., Dee, D., and Thépaut, J-N: ERA5 monthly averaged data on single levels from 1940 to present, Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) Climate Data Store (CDS) [data set], https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.f17050d7, 2023.
Hirata, T., Hardman-Mountford, N. J., Brewin, R. J. W., Aiken, J., Barlow, R., Suzuki, K., Isada, T., Howell, E., Hashioka, T., Noguchi-Aita, M., and Yamanaka, Y.: Synoptic relationships between surface Chlorophyll-a and diagnostic pigments specific to phytoplankton functional types, Biogeosciences, 8, 311–327, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-8-311-2011, 2011.
Hoesly, R. M., Smith, S. J., Feng, L., Klimont, Z., Janssens-Maenhout, G., Pitkanen, T., Seibert, J. J., Vu, L., Andres, R. J., Bolt, R. M., Bond, T. C., Dawidowski, L., Kholod, N., Kurokawa, J.-I., Li, M., Liu, L., Lu, Z., Moura, M. C. P., O'Rourke, P. R., and Zhang, Q.: Historical (1750–2014) anthropogenic emissions of reactive gases and aerosols from the Community Emissions Data System (CEDS), Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 369–408, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-369-2018, 2018.
Holl, C. M. and Montoya, J. P.: Interactions between nitrate uptake and nitrogen fixation in continuous cultures of the marine diazotroph Trichodesmium (cyanobacteria), J. Phycol., 41, 1178–1183, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-8817.2005.00146.x, 2005.
Holtslag, A. A. M. and Boville, B. A.: Local Versus Nonlocal Boundary-Layer Diffusion in a Global Climate Model, J. Climate, 6, 1825–1842, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1993)006<1825:LVNBLD>2.0.co;2, 1993.
Holtslag, A. A. M. and Moeng, C.-H.: Eddy Diffusivity and Countergradient Transport in the Convective Atmospheric Boundary Layer, J. Atmos. Sci., 48, 1690–1698, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1991)048<1690:EDACTI>2.0.CO;2, 1991.
Holzer, M., DeVries, T., and de Lavergne, C.:. Diffusion controls the ventilation of a Pacific Shadow Zone above abyssal overturning, Nat. Commun., 12, 1–13, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-24648-x, 2021.
IES-1980, Millero, F. J., Poisson, A., Tung, C. C., Bradshaw, A. L., and Schleicher, K.: Background papers and supporting data on the International Equation of State of Seawater, 1980, Joint Panel on Oceanographic Tables and Standards, Sydney, Canada, UNESCO technical papers in marine science, 38, 192 pp., 1981.
Ito, G., Romanou, A., Kiang, N. Y., Faluvegi, G., Aleinov, I., Ruedy, R., Russell, G., Lerner, P., Kelley, M., and Lo, K.: Global Carbon Cycle and Climate Feedbacks in the NASA GISS ModelE2.1, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 12, 1–44, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS002030, 2020.
Jacobson, A. R., Schuldt, K. N., Miller, J. B., Oda, T., Tans, P., Andrews, A., Mund, J., Ott, L., Collatz, G. J., Aalto, T., Afshar, S., Aikin, K., Aoki, S., Apadula, F., Baier, B., Bergamaschi, P., Beyersdorf, A., Biraud, S. C., and Bollenbacher, A.: CarbonTracker CT2022, NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory, https://doi.org/10.25925/Z1GJ-3254, 2023.
Jayne, S. R.: The Impact of Abyssal Mixing Parameterizations in an Ocean General Circulation Model, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 39, 1756–1775, 10.1175/2009JPO4085.1, 2009.
Joiner, J. and Yoshida, Y.: Global MODIS and FLUXNET-derived Daily Gross Primary Production, V2, ORNL DAAC, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA [data set], https://doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1835, 2021.
Keil, R. G., Neibauer, J. A., Biladeau, C., van der Elst, K., and Devol, A. H.: A multiproxy approach to understanding the “enhanced” flux of organic matter through the oxygen-deficient waters of the Arabian Sea, Biogeosciences, 13, 2077–2092, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-2077-2016, 2016.
Kelley, M., Schmidt, G. A., Nazarenko, L. S., Bauer, S. E., Ruedy, R., Russell, G. L., Ackerman, A. S., Aleinov, I., Bauer, M., Bleck, R., Canuto, V., Cesana, G., Cheng, Y., Clune, T. L., Cook, B. I., Cruz, C. A., del Genio, A. D., Elsaesser, G. S., Faluvegi, G., and Yao, M. S.: GISS-E2.1: Configurations and Climatology, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 12, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS002025, 2020.
Kim, Y., Moorcroft, P. R., Aleinov, I., Puma, M. J., and Kiang, N. Y.: Variability of phenology and fluxes of water and carbon with observed and simulated soil moisture in the Ent Terrestrial Biosphere Model (Ent TBM version 1.0.1.0.0), Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 3837–3865, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-3837-2015, 2015.
Koster, R. D. and Suarez, M. J.: Energy and Water Balance Calculations in the Mosaic LSM (NASA Technical Memorandum 104606, Vol. 9; Technical Report Series on Global Modeling and Data Assimilation, 60 pp.). National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Goddard Space Flight Center, 1996.
Kopp, G. and Lean, J. L.: A new, lower value of total solar irradiance: Evidence and climate significance, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL045777, 2011.
Kottek, M., Grieser, J., Beck, C., Rudolf, B., and Rubel, F.: World Map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification updated, Meteorol. Z., 15, 259–263, https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2006/0130, 2006.
Krakauer, N. Y., Puma, M. J., Cook, B. I., Gentine, P., and Nazarenko, L.: Ocean–atmosphere interactions modulate irrigation's climate impacts, Earth Syst. Dynam., 7, 863–876, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-7-863-2016, 2016.
Krumhardt, K. M., Lovenduski, N. S., Iglesias-Rodriguez, M. D., and Kleypas, J. A.: Coccolithophore growth and calcification in a changing ocean, Progr. Oceanogr., 159, 276–295, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2017.10.007, 2017.
Lacis, A. A. and Oinas, V.: A description of the correlated k distribution method for modeling nongray gaseous absorption, thermal emission, and multiple scattering in vertically inhomogeneous atmospheres, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 96, 9027–9063, https://doi.org/10.1029/90JD01945, 1991.
Landschützer, P., Gruber, N., and Bakker, D. C. E.: Decadal variations and trends of the globalocean carbon sink, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 30, 1396–1417, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GB005359, 2016.
Lam, P. and Kuypers, M. M. Microbial nitrogen cycling processes in oxygen minimum zones, Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci., 3, 317–345, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-120709-142814, 2011.
Lan, X., Tans, P., and Thoning, K. W.: Trends in globally-averaged CO2 determined from NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory measurements [data set], https://doi.org/10.15138/9N0H-ZH07, 2022a.
Lan, X., Thoning, K. W., and Dlugokencky, E. J.: Trends in globally-averaged CH4, N2O, and SF6 determined from NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory measurements [data set], https://doi.org/10.15138/P8XG-AA10, 2022b.
Large, W. G., McWilliams, J. C., and Doney, S. C.: Oceanic vertical mixing: A review and a model with a nonlocal boundary layer parameterization, Rev. Geophys., 32, 363–403, https://doi.org/10.1029/94RG01872, 1994.
Latto, R. and Romanou, A.: The Ocean Carbon States Database: a proof-of-concept application of cluster analysis in the ocean carbon cycle, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 10, 609–626, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-609-2018, 2018.
Lauvset, S. K., Key, R. M., Olsen, A., van Heuven, S., Velo, A., Lin, X., Schirnick, C., Kozyr, A., Tanhua, T., Hoppema, M., Jutterström, S., Steinfeldt, R., Jeansson, E., Ishii, M., Perez, F. F., Suzuki, T., and Watelet, S.: A new global interior ocean mapped climatology: the 1° × 1° GLODAP version 2, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 8, 325–340, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-8-325-2016, 2016.
Lawrence, D., Thornton, P. E., Oleson, K. W., and Bonan, G. B.: The partitioning of evapotranspiration into transpiration, soil evaporation, and canopy evaporation in a GCM: Impacts on land-atmosphere interaction, J. Hydrometeorol., 8, 862–880, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM596.1, 2007.
Laws, E. A., Pei, S., Bienfang, P., and Grant, S.: Phosphate-limited growth and uptake kinetics of the marine prasinophyte Tetraselmis suecica (Kylin) Butcher, Aquaculture, 322, 117-121, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2011.09.041, 2011.
Lennsen, N., Schmidt, G. A., Hendrickson, M., Jacobs, P., Menne, M., and Ruedy, R.: A GISTEMPv4 observational uncertainty ensemble, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 129, 1–18, https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JD040179, 2024.
Lerner, P., Marchal, O., Lam, P. J., Buesseler, K., and Charette, M.: Kinetics of thorium and particle cycling along the US GEOTRACES North Atlantic Transect, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 125, 106–128, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2017.05.003, 2017.
Lerner, P., Romanou, A., Kelley, M., Romanski, J., Ruedy, R., and Russell, G.: Drivers of air-sea CO2 flux seasonality and its long-term changes in the NASA-GISS model CMIP6 submission, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 13, e2019MS002028, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS002028, 2021.
Lerner, P., Romanou, A., Nicholson, D., Kelley, M., Ruedy, R., and Russell, G.: The sensitivity of the Equatorial Pacific ODZ to particulate organic matter remineralization in a climate model under pre-industrial conditions, Ocean Model., 188, 102303, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2023.102303, 2024.
Levis, S., Bonan, G. B., Vertenstein, M., and Oleson, K. W.: The Community Land Model’s Dynamic Global Vegetation Model (CLM-DGVM): Technical Description and User’s Guide (NCAR Technical Note NCAR/TN-459+STR), Terrestrial Sciences Section, Climate and Global Dynamics Division, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, 2004.
Liefer, J. D., Garg, A., Campbell, D. A., Irwin, A. J., and Finkel, Z. V.: Nitrogen starvation induces distinct photosynthetic responses and recovery dynamics in diatoms and prasinophytes, PLoS One, 13, e0195705, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195705, 2018.
Liu, G., Ciais, P., Tao, S., Yang, H., and Bastos, A.: A High-Resolution, Long-Term Global Radar-Based Above-Ground Biomass Dataset from 1993 to 2020, Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss. [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-330, 2025.
Locarnini, R. A., Mishonov, A. V., Baranova, O. K., Reagan, J. R., Boyer, T. P., Seidov, D., Wang, Z., Garcia, H. E., Bouchard, C., Cross, S. L., Paver, C. R., and Dukhovskoy, D.: World Ocean Atlas 2023, Volume 1: Temperature, NOAA Atlas NESDIS 89, 40 pp., https://doi.org/10.25923/54bh-1613, 2024.
Loth, B., and Graf, H.-F.: Modeling the snow cover in climate studies: 1. Long-term integrations under different climatic conditions using a multilayered snow-cover model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 103, 11313–11327, https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD01411, 1998.
Lyman, J. M. and Johnson, G. C.: Global High-Resolution Random Forest Regression Maps of Ocean Heat Content Anomalies Using in Situ and Satellite Data, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-22-0058.1, 2023.
Makela, A., Hari, P., Berninger, F., Hanninen, H., and Nikinmaa, E.: Acclimation of photosynthetic capacity in Scots pine to the annual cycle of temperature, Tree Physiol., 24, 369–376, 2004.
Makela, A., Kolari, P. J., Karimaki, E., Nikinmaa, M., Peramaki, M., and Hari, P.: Modelling five years of weather-driven variation of GPP in a boreal forest, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 139, 382–398, 2006.
Marshall, J., Scott, J. R., Romanou, A., Kelley, M., and Leboissetier, A.: The dependence of the ocean's MOC on mesoscale eddy diffusivities: A model study, Ocean Model., 111, 1–8, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2017.01.001, 2017.
Massoud, E. C., Xu, C., Fisher, R. A., Knox, R. G., Walker, A. P., Serbin, S. P., Christoffersen, B. O., Holm, J. A., Kueppers, L. M., Ricciuto, D. M., Wei, L., Johnson, D. J., Chambers, J. Q., Koven, C. D., McDowell, N. G., and Vrugt, J. A.: Identification of key parameters controlling demographically structured vegetation dynamics in a land surface model: CLM4.5(FATES), Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 4133–4164, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4133-2019, 2019.
Matthews, E.: Prescription of land-surface boundary conditions in GISS GCM II: A simple method based on high-resolution vegetation data bases (NASA Technical Memorandum 86096), National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Goddard Institute for Space Studies, 1984.
Matthes, K., Funke, B., Andersson, M. E., Barnard, L., Beer, J., Charbonneau, P., Clilverd, M. A., Dudok de Wit, T., Haberreiter, M., Hendry, A., Jackman, C. H., Kretzschmar, M., Kruschke, T., Kunze, M., Langematz, U., Marsh, D. R., Maycock, A. C., Misios, S., Rodger, C. J., Scaife, A. A., Seppälä, A., Shangguan, M., Sinnhuber, M., Tourpali, K., Usoskin, I., van de Kamp, M., Verronen, P. T., and Versick, S.: Solar forcing for CMIP6 (v3.2), Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 2247–2302, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-2247-2017, 2017.
Meinshausen, M., Vogel, E., Nauels, A., Lorbacher, K., Meinshausen, N., Etheridge, D. M., Fraser, P. J., Montzka, S. A., Rayner, P. J., Trudinger, C. M., Krummel, P. B., Beyerle, U., Canadell, J. G., Daniel, J. S., Enting, I. G., Law, R. M., Lunder, C. R., O'Doherty, S., Prinn, R. G., Reimann, S., Rubino, M., Velders, G. J. M., Vollmer, M. K., Wang, R. H. J., and Weiss, R.: Historical greenhouse gas concentrations for climate modelling (CMIP6), Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 2057–2116, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-2057-2017, 2017.
Mellor, G. L. and Yamada, T.: Development of a turbulence closure model for geophysical fluid problems, Rev. Geophys., 20, 851–875, https://doi.org/10.1029/RG020i004p00851, 1982.
Meng, J., Huang, Y., Leung, D. M., Li, L., Adebiyi, A. A., Ryder, C. L., Mahowald, N. M., and Kok, J. F.: Improved parameterization for the size distribution of emitted dust aerosols reduces model underestimation of super coarse dust, Geophys. Res. Lett., 49, e2021GL097287, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL097287, 2022.
Mezuman, K., Tsigaridis, K., Faluvegi, G., and Bauer, S. E.: The interactive global fire module pyrE (v1.0), Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 3091–3118, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3091-2020, 2020.
Miller, R. L., Cakmur, R. V., Perlwitz, J. P., Geogdzhayev, I. V., Ginoux, P., Kohfeld, K. E., Koch, D., Prigent, C., Ruedy, R., Schmidt, G. A., and Tegen, I.: Mineral dust aerosols in the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Sciences ModelE atmospheric general circulation model, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D06208, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD005796, 2006.
Miller, R. L., Schmidt, G. A., Nazarenko, L. S., Bauer, S. E., Kelley, M., Ruedy, R., Russell, G. L., Ackerman, A. S., Aleinov, I., Bauer, M., Bleck, R., Canuto, V., Cesana, G., Cheng, Y., Clune, T. L., Cook, B. I., Cruz, C. A., del Genio, A. D., Elsaesser, G. S., and Yao, M. S.: CMIP6 Historical Simulations (1850–2014) With GISS-E2.1, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 13, 1–59, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS002034, 2021.
Mishchenko, M. I., Travis, L. D., and Mackowski, D. W.: T-matrix computations of light scattering by nonspherical particles: A review, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 55, 535–575, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4073(96)00002-7, 1996.
Myneni, R. B., Hoffman, S., Knyazikhin, Y., Privette, J. L., Glassy, J., Tian, Y., Wang, Y., Song, X., Zhang, Y., Smith, G. R., Lotsch, A., Friedl, M., Morisette, J. T., Votava, P., Nemani, R. R., and Running, S. W.: Global products of vegetation leaf area and fraction absorbed PAR from year one of MODIS data, Remote Sens. Environ., 83, 214–231, 2002.
Najjar, R. G., Jin, X., Louanchi, F., Aumont, O., Caldeira, K., Doney, S. C., Dutay, J.-C., Follows, M., Gruber, N., Joos, F., Lindsay, K., Maier-Reimer, E., Matear, R. J., Matsumoto, K., Monfray, P., Mouchet, A., Orr, J. C., Plattner, G.-K., Sarmiento, J. L., Schlitzer, R., Slater, R. D., Weirig, M.-F., Yamanaka, Y., and Yool, A.: Impact of circulation on export production, dissolved organic matter, and dissolved oxygen in the ocean: Results from Phase II of the Ocean Carbon-cycle Model Intercomparison Project (OCMIP-2), Global Biogeochem. Cy., 21, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GB002857, 2007.
Nakanishi, M.: Improvement of the Mellor–Yamada turbulence closure model based on large eddy simulation data, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 99, 349–378, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018915827400, 2001.
Nelson, D. M. and Tréguer, P.: Role of silicon as a limiting nutrient to Antarctic diatoms: evidence from kinetic studies in the Ross Sea ice-edge zone, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 80, 255–264, https://doi.org/10.3354/meps080255, 1992.
Ni-Meister, W., Yang, W. Z., and Kiang, N. Y.: A clumped-foliage canopy radiative transfer model for a global dynamic terrestrial ecosystem model. I: Theory, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 150, 881–894, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2010.02.009, 2010.
Ochoa, F., Brodrick, P. G., Okin, G. S., Ben-Dor, E., Meyer, T., Thompson, D. R., and Green, R. O.: Soil and vegetation cover estimation for global imaging spectroscopy using spectral mixture analysis, Remote Sens. Environ., 324, 114746, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2025.114746, 2025.
Oinas, V., Lacis, A. A., Rind, D., Shindell, D. T., and Hansen, J. E.: Radiative cooling by stratospheric water vapor: Big differences in GCM results, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 2791–2794, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GL013137, 2001.
Orr, J. C. and Epitalon, J.-M.: Improved routines to model the ocean carbonate system: mocsy 2.0, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 485–499, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-485-2015, 2015.
Orr, J. C., Najjar, R. G., Aumont, O., Bopp, L., Bullister, J. L., Danabasoglu, G., Doney, S. C., Dunne, J. P., Dutay, J.-C., Graven, H., Griffies, S. M., John, J. G., Joos, F., Levin, I., Lindsay, K., Matear, R. J., McKinley, G. A., Mouchet, A., Oschlies, A., Romanou, A., Schlitzer, R., Tagliabue, A., Tanhua, T., and Yool, A.: Biogeochemical protocols and diagnostics for the CMIP6 Ocean Model Intercomparison Project (OMIP), Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 2169–2199, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-2169-2017, 2017.
Parekh, P., Follows, M. J., and Boyle, E.: Modeling the global ocean iron cycle, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 18, 1–5, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GB002061, 2004.
Pérez García-Pando, C., Miller, R. L., Perlwitz, J. P., Rodríguez, S., and Prospero, J. M.: Predicting the mineral composition of dust aerosols: Insights from elemental composition measured at the Izaña Observatory, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 10520–10529, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL069873, 2016.
Perlwitz, J. P., Pérez García-Pando, C., and Miller, R. L.: Predicting the mineral composition of dust aerosols – Part 1: Representing key processes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 11593–11627, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11593-2015, 2015a.
Perlwitz, J. P., Pérez García-Pando, C., and Miller, R. L.: Predicting the mineral composition of dust aerosols – Part 2: Model evaluation and identification of key processes with observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 11629–11652, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11629-2015, 2015b.
Potter, C. S., Matson, P. A., and Vitousek, P. M.: Process modeling of controls on nitrogen trace gas emissions from soils worldwide, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 1361–1377, 1996.
Prather, M. J.: Numerical advection by conservation of second-order moments, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 91, 6671–6681, https://doi.org/10.1029/JD091iD06p06671, 1986.
Puma, M. J. and Cook, B. I.: Effects of irrigation on global climate during the 20th century, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D16120, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014122, 2010.
Quigley, M. S., Santschi, P. H., Hung, C. C., Guo, L., and Honeyman, B. D.: Importance of acid polysaccharides for 234Th complexation to marine organic matter, Limnol. Oceanogr., 47, 367–377, https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2002.47.2.0367, 2002.
Randerson, J. T., Hoffman, F. M., Thornton, P. E., Mahowald, N. M., Lindsay, K., Lee, Y. H., Nevison, C. D., Doney, S. C., Bonan, G., Stockli, R., Covey, C., Running, S. W., and Fung, I. Y.: Systematic assessment of terrestrial biogeochemistry in coupled climate-carbon models, Glob. Change Biol., 15, 2462–2484, 2009.
Randerson, J. T., Li, Y., Fu, W., Primeau, F., Kim, J. E., Mu, M., Hoffman, F. M., Trugman, A. T., Yang, L., Wu, C., Wang, J. A., Anderegg, W. R. L., Baccini, A., Friedl, M. A., Saatchi, S. S., Denning, A. S., and Goulden, M. L.: The weak land carbon sink hypothesis, Sci. Adv., 11, eadr5489, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adr5489, 2025.
Reagan, J. R., Seidov, D., Wang, Z., Dukhovskoy, D., Boyer, T. P., Locarnini, R. A., Baranova, O. K., Mishonov, A. V., Garcia, H. E., Bouchard, C., Cross, S. L., and Paver, C. R.: World Ocean Atlas 2023, Volume 2: Salinity. A. Mishonov, Technical Editor, NOAA Atlas NESDIS 90, 52 pp., https://doi.org/10.25923/70qt-9574, 2024.
Repo, T., Makela, A., and Hanninen, H. (Eds.): Modelling to understand forest functions, Silva Carelica, 15, 61–74, University of Joensuu, ISBN-10 951-696-891-0,10, 1990.
Respati, M. R., Dommenget, D., Segura, H., and Stassen, C.: Diagnosing drivers of tropical precipitation biases in coupled climate model simulations, Clim. Dynam., 62, 8691–8709, 10.1007/s00382-024-07355-3, 2024.
Rodriguez-Iturbe, I., Porporato, A., Laio, F., and Ridolfi, L.: Plants in water-controlled ecosystems: active role in hydrologic processes and response to water stress – I. Scope and general outline, Adv. Water Resour., 24, 695–705, 2001.
Romanou, A., Gregg, W. W., Romanski, J., Kelley, M., Bleck, R., Healy, R., Nazarenko, L., Russell, G., Schmidt, G. A., Sun, S., and Tausnev, N.: Natural air-sea flux of CO2 in simulations of the NASA-GISS climate model: Sensitivity to the physical ocean model formulation, Ocean Model., 66, 26–44, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2013.01.008, 2013.
Romanou, A., Romanski, J., and Gregg, W. W.: Natural ocean carbon cycle sensitivity to parameterizations of the recycling in a climate model, Biogeosciences, 11, 1137–1154, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-1137-2014, 2014.
Romanou, A., Marshall, J., Kelley, M., and Scott, J.: Role of the ocean's AMOC in setting the uptake efficiency of transient tracers, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 5590–5598, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL072972, 2017.
Romanou, A., Lerner, P., Kiang, N., Hakuba, M., and Wang, O.: NASA-GISS ModelE2.1-CC2, Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17247307, 2025.
Russell, G. L., Miller, J. R., and Rind, D.: A Coupled Atmosphère-Océan Model for Transient Climate Change Studies, Atmosphere-Ocean, 33, https://doi.org/10.1080/07055900.1995.9649550, 1995.
Ryan-Keogh, T. J., Thomalla, S. J., Chang, N., and Moalusi, T.: A new global oceanic multi-model net primary productivity data product, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 4829–4848, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-4829-2023, 2023.
Sanderson, B. M., Brovkin, V., Fisher, R. A., Hohn, D., Ilyina, T., Jones, C. D., Koenigk, T., Koven, C., Li, H., Lawrence, D. M., Lawrence, P., Liddicoat, S., MacDougall, A. H., Mengis, N., Nicholls, Z., O'Rourke, E., Romanou, A., Sandstad, M., Schwinger, J., Séférian, R., Sentman, L. T., Simpson, I. R., Smith, C., Steinert, N. J., Swann, A. L. S., Tjiputra, J., and Ziehn, T.: flat10MIP: an emissions-driven experiment to diagnose the climate response to positive, zero and negative CO2 emissions, Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 5699–5724, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-5699-2025, 2025.
Schaaf, C. and Wang, Z.: MODIS/Terra+Aqua BRDF/Albedo Albedo Daily L3 Global 0.05Deg CMG V061, NASA Land Processes Distributed Active Archive Center [data set], https://doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MCD43C3.061, 2025.
Schmidt, G. A., Ruedy, R., Hansen, J. E., Aleinov, I., Bell, N., Bauer, M., Bauer, S., Cairns, B., Canuto, V., Cheng, Y., Genio, A. del, Faluvegi, G., Friend, A. D., Hall, T. M., Hu, Y., Kelley, M., Kiang, N. Y., Koch, D., Lacis, A. A., and Russell, G. L.: Present-Day Atmospheric Simulations Using GISS ModelE: Comparison to In Situ, Satellite, and Reanalysis Data, J. Climate, 19, 153–192, https://doi.org/10.2307/26253812, 2006.
Schmidt, G. A., Kelley, M., Nazarenko, L., Ruedy, R., Russell, G. L., Aleinov, I., Bauer, M., Bauer, S. E., Bhat, M. K., Bleck, R., Canuto, V., Chen, Y. H., Cheng, Y., Clune, T. L., del Genio, A., de Fainchtein, R., Faluvegi, G., Hansen, J. E., Healy, R. J., and Zhang, J.: Configuration and assessment of the GISS ModelE2 contributions to the CMIP5 archive, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 6, 141–184, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013MS000265, 2014.
Schneider, U., Becker, A., Finger, P., Meyer-Christoffer, A., Rudolf, B., and Ziese, M.: GPCC Full Data Reanalysis Version 6.0 at 0.5°: Monthly Land-Surface Precipitation from Rain-Gauges built on GTS-based and Historic Data, Global Precipitation Climatology Centre, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration [data set], https://doi.org/10.5676/DWD_GPCC/FD_M_V7_050, 2011.
Sherman, E., Moore, J. K., Primeau, F., and Tanouye, D.: Temperature influence on phytoplankton community growth rates, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 30, 550–559, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GB005272, 2016.
Shukla, S. P., Puma, M. J., and Cook, B. I.: The response of the South Asian Summer Monsoon circulation to intensified irrigation in global climate model simulations, Clim. Dynam., 42, 21–36, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-013-1786-9, 2014.
Siebert, S., Kummu, M., Porkka, M., Döll, P., Ramankutty, N., and Scanlon, B. R.: A global data set of the extent of irrigated land from 1900 to 2005, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 1521–1545, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-1521-2015, 2015.
Silsbe, G. M., Behrenfeld, M. J., Halsey, K. H., Milligan, A. J., and Westberry, T. K.: The CAFE model: A net production model for globalocean phytoplankton, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 30, 1756–1777, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GB005521, 2016.
Silvy, Y., Frölicher, T. L., Terhaar, J., Joos, F., Burger, F. A., Lacroix, F., Allen, M., Bernardello, R., Bopp, L., Brovkin, V., Buzan, J. R., Cadule, P., Dix, M., Dunne, J., Friedlingstein, P., Georgievski, G., Hajima, T., Jenkins, S., Kawamiya, M., Kiang, N. Y., Lapin, V., Lee, D., Lerner, P., Mengis, N., Monteiro, E. A., Paynter, D., Peters, G. P., Romanou, A., Schwinger, J., Sparrow, S., Stofferahn, E., Tjiputra, J., Tourigny, E., and Ziehn, T.: AERA-MIP: emission pathways, remaining budgets, and carbon cycle dynamics compatible with 1.5 and 2 °C global warming stabilization, Earth Syst. Dynam., 15, 1591–1628, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-1591-2024, 2024.
Simard, M., Pinto, N., Fisher, J. B., and Baccini, A.: Mapping forest canopy height globally with spaceborne lidar, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 116, G04021, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JG001708, 2011.
Spawn, S. A., Sullivan, C. C., Lark, T. J., and Gibbs, H. K.: Harmonized global maps of above and belowground biomass carbon density in the year 2010, Sci. Data, 7, 112, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0444-4, 2020.
Spitters, C. J. T., Toussaint, H. A. J. M., and Goudriaan, J.: Separating the diffuse and direct component of global radiation and its implications for modeling canopy photosynthesis Part I. Components of incoming radiation, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 38, 217–229, https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1923(86)90060-2, 1986.
Storto, A., Alvera-Azcárate, A., Balmaseda, M. A., Barth, A., Chevallier, M., Counillon, F., Domingues, C. M., Drévillon, M., Drillet, Y., Forget, G., Garric, G., Haines, K., Hernandez, F., Iovino, D., Jackson, L. C., Lellouche, J.-M., Masina, S., Mayer, M., Oke, P. R.,Penny, S. G., Peterson, K. A., Yang, C., and Zuo, H.: Ocean reanalyses: Recent advances and unsolved challenges, Fronti. Mar. Sci., 6, 418, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00418, 2019.
Tian, Y. H., Woodcock, C. E., Wang, Y. J., Privette, J. L., Shabanov, N. V., Zhou, L. M., Zhang, Y., Buermann, W., Dong, J. R., Veikkanen, B., Hame, T., Andersson, K., Ozdogan, M., Knyazikhin, Y., and Myneni, R. B.: Multiscale analysis and validation of the MODIS LAI product – I. Uncertainty assessment, Remote Sens. Environ., 83, 414–431, 2002a.
Tian, Y. H., Woodcock, C. E., Wang, Y. J., Privette, J. L., Shabanov, N. V., Zhou, L. M., Zhang, Y., Buermann, W., Dong, J. R., Veikkanen, B., Hame, T., Andersson, K., Ozdogan, M., Knyazikhin, Y., and Myneni, R. B.: Multiscale Analysis and Validation of the MODIS LAI Product. II. Sampling Strategy. Remote Sens. Environ., 83, 431–441, Remote Sens. Enviro., 83, 431–441, 2002b.
Troen, I. B. and Mahrt, L.: A simple model of the atmospheric boundary layer; sensitivity to surface evaporation, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 37, 129–148, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00122760, 1986.
Van Marle, M. J. E., Field, R. D., van der Werf, G. R., Estrada de Wagt, I. A., Houghton, R. A., Rizzo, L. V., Artaxo, P., and Tsigaridis, K.: Fire and deforestation dynamics in Amazonia (1973-2014). Global Biogeochem. Cy., 31, 24–38, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GB005445, 2017.
van der Does, M., Korte, L. F., Munday, C. I., Brummer, G.-J. A., and Stuut, J.-B. W.: Particle size traces modern Saharan dust transport and deposition across the equatorial North Atlantic, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 13697–13710, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-13697-2016, 2016.
van der Does, M., Brummer, G.-J. A., van Crimpen, F. C. J., Korte, L. F., Mahowald, N. M., Merkel, U., Yu, H., Zuidema, P., and Stuut, J.-B. W.: Tropical rains controlling deposition of Saharan dust across the North Atlantic Ocean, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2019GL086867, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL086867, 2020.
Wada, Y., Wisser, D., and Bierkens, M. F. P.: Global modeling of withdrawal, allocation and consumptive use of surface water and groundwater resources, Earth Syst. Dynam., 5, 15–40, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-5-15-2014, 2014.
Wang, Y.-P., Baldocchi, D. D., Leuning, R., Falge, E. M., and Vesala, T.: Estimating parameters in a land-surface model by applying nonlinear inversion to eddy covariance flux measurements from eight FLUXNET sites, Glob. Change Biol., 13, 652–670, 2007.
Warren, S. G. and Wiscombe, W. J.: A Model for the Spectral Albedo of Snow. II: Snow Containing Atmospheric Aerosols, J. Atmos. Sci., 37, 2734–2745, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1980)037<2734:AMFTSA>2.0.co;2, 1980.
Westberry, T. K, Silsbe, G. M., and Behrenfeld, M. J.: Gross and net primary production in the global ocean: An ocean color remote sensing perspective, Earth-Sci. Rev., 237, 104322, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2023.104322, 2023.
Xu, X. and Chen, D.: Estimating global annual gross primary production based on satellite-derived phenology and maximal carbon uptake capacity, Environ. Res., 252, 119063, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2024.119063, 2024.
Yamanaka, Y. and Tajika, E.: The role of the vertical fluxes of particulate organic matter and calcite in the oceanic carbon cycle: Studies using an ocean biogeochemical general circulation model, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 10, 361–382, https://doi.org/10.1029/96GB00634, 1996.
Yang, W. Z., Ni-Meister, W., Kiang, N. Y., Moorcroft, P. R., Strahler, A. H., and Oliphant, A.: A clumped-foliage canopy radiative transfer model for a Global Dynamic Terrestrial Ecosystem Model II: Comparison to measurements, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 150, 895–907, 10.1016/j.agrformet.2010.02.008, 2010.
Yang, W. Z., Tan, B., Huang, D., Rautiainen, M., Shabanov, N. V., Wang, Y., Privette, J. L., Huemmrich, K. F., Fensholt, R., Sandholt, I., Weiss, M., Ahl, D. E., Gower, S. T., Nemani, R. R., Knyazikhin, Y., and Myneni, R. B.: MODIS leaf area index products: From validation to algorithm improvement, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 44, 1885–1898, 2006.
Yao, M.-S. and Cheng, Y.: Cloud Simulations in Response to Turbulence Parameterizations in the GISS Model E GCM, J. Climate, 25, 4963–4974, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00399.1, 2012.
Zeng, X., Dickinson, R. E., Barlage, M., Dai, Y., and Wang, G.: Treatment of undercanopy turbulence in land models, J. Climate, 18, 5086–5094, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3595.1, 2005.
Zhang, J. and Rothrock, D.: Modeling Arctic sea ice with an efficient plastic solution, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 105, 3325–3338, https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JC900320, 2000.
Short summary
This paper describes simulations of the present climate using the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies Earth System model. Major highlight is the capability to include complex interactions of the different components of the Earth System, including biology, and compare well with a wide variety of observations. We demonstrate that this model can be used to address present, past and future changes in the Earth system and their impacts and interactions with ecosystems.
This paper describes simulations of the present climate using the NASA Goddard Institute for...
