Articles | Volume 19, issue 16
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-7589-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-7589-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Development and technical paper
| 
18 Aug 2026
Development and technical paper |
| 18 Aug 2026
| 18 Aug 2026
Effects of assimilating phytoplankton carbon in marine ecosystem modelling in NEMO4.0.4-MEDUSA2.0-PDAF2.0
School of Mathematical, Physical and Computational Sciences, University of Reading, Reading RG6 6ET, UK
National Centre for Earth Observation, University of Reading, Reading RG6 6ET, UK
Dale Partridge
National Centre for Earth Observation, University of Reading, Reading RG6 6ET, UK
Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Plymouth, PL1 3DH, United Kingdom
Lars Nerger
Alfred-Wegener-Institut, Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar-und Meeresforschung (AWI), 27570 Bremerhaven, Germany
Related authors
Lars Nerger, Yumeng Chen, Armin Corbin, and Johannes Keller
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2412, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2412, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Short summary
Data Assimilation combines information from numerical models and real-world observations. The complexity of models and observations necessitates advanced software to apply data assimilation with good efficiency. We discuss the relevant features of one such software, the open-source framework PDAF, which is already a widely used software for data assimilation. PDAF allows users to create their own efficient data assimilation system for a model of their choice as we demonstrate with an example.
Yumeng Chen, Lars Nerger, and Amos S. Lawless
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 8235–8252, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-8235-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-8235-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
In this paper, we present pyPDAF, a Python interface to the parallel data assimilation framework (PDAF) allowing for coupling with Python-based models. We demonstrate the capability and efficiency of pyPDAF under a coupled data assimilation setup.
Jozef Skákala, David Ford, Keith Haines, Amos Lawless, Matthew J. Martin, Philip Browne, Marcin Chrust, Stefano Ciavatta, Alison Fowler, Daniel Lea, Matthew Palmer, Andrea Rochner, Jennifer Waters, Hao Zuo, Deep S. Banerjee, Mike Bell, Davi M. Carneiro, Yumeng Chen, Susan Kay, Dale Partridge, Martin Price, Richard Renshaw, Georgy Shapiro, and James While
Ocean Sci., 21, 1709–1734, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-21-1709-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-21-1709-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
UK marine data assimilation (MDA) involves a closely collaborating research community. In this paper, we offer both an overview of the state of the art and a vision for the future across all of the main areas of UK MDA, ranging from physics to biogeochemistry to coupled DA. We discuss the current UK MDA stakeholder applications, highlight theoretical developments needed to advance our systems, and reflect upon upcoming opportunities with respect to hardware and observational missions.
Yumeng Chen, Polly Smith, Alberto Carrassi, Ivo Pasmans, Laurent Bertino, Marc Bocquet, Tobias Sebastian Finn, Pierre Rampal, and Véronique Dansereau
The Cryosphere, 18, 2381–2406, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-2381-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-2381-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We explore multivariate state and parameter estimation using a data assimilation approach through idealised simulations in a dynamics-only sea-ice model based on novel rheology. We identify various potential issues that can arise in complex operational sea-ice models when model parameters are estimated. Even though further investigation will be needed for such complex sea-ice models, we show possibilities of improving the observed and the unobserved model state forecast and parameter accuracy.
Bo Dong, Ross Bannister, Yumeng Chen, Alison Fowler, and Keith Haines
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 4233–4247, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4233-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4233-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Traditional Kalman smoothers are expensive to apply in large global ocean operational forecast and reanalysis systems. We develop a cost-efficient method to overcome the technical constraints and to improve the performance of existing reanalysis products.
Tobias Sebastian Finn, Charlotte Durand, Alban Farchi, Marc Bocquet, Yumeng Chen, Alberto Carrassi, and Véronique Dansereau
The Cryosphere, 17, 2965–2991, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-2965-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-2965-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We combine deep learning with a regional sea-ice model to correct model errors in the sea-ice dynamics of low-resolution forecasts towards high-resolution simulations. The combined model improves the forecast by up to 75 % and thereby surpasses the performance of persistence. As the error connection can additionally be used to analyse the shortcomings of the forecasts, this study highlights the potential of combined modelling for short-term sea-ice forecasting.
Sukun Cheng, Yumeng Chen, Ali Aydoğdu, Laurent Bertino, Alberto Carrassi, Pierre Rampal, and Christopher K. R. T. Jones
The Cryosphere, 17, 1735–1754, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-1735-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-1735-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This work studies a novel application of combining a Lagrangian sea ice model, neXtSIM, and data assimilation. It uses a deterministic ensemble Kalman filter to incorporate satellite-observed ice concentration and thickness in simulations. The neXtSIM Lagrangian nature is handled using a remapping strategy on a common homogeneous mesh. The ensemble is formed by perturbing air–ocean boundary conditions and ice cohesion. Thanks to data assimilation, winter Arctic sea ice forecasting is enhanced.
Yumeng Chen, Alberto Carrassi, and Valerio Lucarini
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 28, 633–649, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-28-633-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-28-633-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Chaotic dynamical systems are sensitive to the initial conditions, which are crucial for climate forecast. These properties are often used to inform the design of data assimilation (DA), a method used to estimate the exact initial conditions. However, obtaining the instability properties is burdensome for complex problems, both numerically and analytically. Here, we suggest a different viewpoint. We show that the skill of DA can be used to infer the instability properties of a dynamical system.
Dale Partridge, Deep Banerjee, David Ford, Ke Wang, Jozef Skákala, Juliane Wihsgott, Prathyush P. Menon, Susan Kay, Daniel Clewley, Andrea Rochner, Emma Sullivan, and Matthew Palmer
Ocean Sci., 22, 2083–2100, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-22-2083-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-22-2083-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
This study outlines the development and testing of a Digital Twin Ocean (DTO) framework, aimed at improving coastal ocean forecasts through the use of autonomous underwater gliders. A fleet of gliders were deployed in the western English Channel during August–September 2024 to collect measurements of temperature, salinity, chlorophyll and oxygen, aiming to track the movement of the harmful algal bloom Karenia mikimotoi.
Lars Nerger, Yumeng Chen, Armin Corbin, and Johannes Keller
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2412, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2412, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Short summary
Data Assimilation combines information from numerical models and real-world observations. The complexity of models and observations necessitates advanced software to apply data assimilation with good efficiency. We discuss the relevant features of one such software, the open-source framework PDAF, which is already a widely used software for data assimilation. PDAF allows users to create their own efficient data assimilation system for a model of their choice as we demonstrate with an example.
Nicholas Williams, Nicholas Byrne, Daniel Feltham, Peter Jan Van Leeuwen, Ross Bannister, David Schroeder, Isobel Lawrence, Lars Nerger, Jack Landy, and Geoffrey Dawson
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-742, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-742, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for The Cryosphere (TC).
Short summary
Short summary
In this study we present three satellite era Arctic sea ice reanalyses, each assimilating different combinations of sea ice concentration and thickness observations. Results show that using year-round thickness observations substantially improves reanalysis compared to winter-only data. The best-performing reanalysis reveals a seasonally compensating bias cycle, suggesting errors in ice growth, leads, refreezing, marginal ice zone dynamics, redistribution, and melt timing mask model errors.
Dale Partridge, Ségolène Berthou, Rebecca Millington, James R. Clark, Lucy Bricheno, Juan Manuel Castillo, Julia Rulent, and Huw Lewis
Ocean Sci., 22, 345–366, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-22-345-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-22-345-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Phytoplankton blooms are governed by the availability of light and nutrients, both of which are affected by mixing in the upper layers of the ocean, which is impacted by wave activity on the surface. Most numerical ocean models estimate waves through a parameterisation, here we explicitly resolve waves through a coupled wave model to examine the impact on the strength and timing of phytoplankton blooms, particular during storms when wave activity is elevated.
Ségolène Berthou, Juan Maria Castillo, Vivian Fraser-Leonhardt, Sana Mahmood, Nefeli Makrygianni, Alex Arnold, Claudio Sanchez, Huw W. Lewis, Dale Partridge, Martin Best, Lucy Bricheno, Helen Davies, Douglas Clark, James R. Clark, Jeff Polton, Andrew Saulter, Chris J. Short, Jonathan Tinker, and Simon Tucker
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6216, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6216, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
The UK’s new RCS-UKC4 system combines atmosphere, ocean, waves, land, rivers, and biogeochemistry models to improve coastal weather and climate predictions. It offers better storm wave predictions, more accurate river flows, and captures rapid sea-level changes. These advances help predict multiple hazards more reliably, supporting safer communities and helping better planning.
Yumeng Chen, Lars Nerger, and Amos S. Lawless
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 8235–8252, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-8235-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-8235-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
In this paper, we present pyPDAF, a Python interface to the parallel data assimilation framework (PDAF) allowing for coupling with Python-based models. We demonstrate the capability and efficiency of pyPDAF under a coupled data assimilation setup.
Jozef Skákala, David Ford, Keith Haines, Amos Lawless, Matthew J. Martin, Philip Browne, Marcin Chrust, Stefano Ciavatta, Alison Fowler, Daniel Lea, Matthew Palmer, Andrea Rochner, Jennifer Waters, Hao Zuo, Deep S. Banerjee, Mike Bell, Davi M. Carneiro, Yumeng Chen, Susan Kay, Dale Partridge, Martin Price, Richard Renshaw, Georgy Shapiro, and James While
Ocean Sci., 21, 1709–1734, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-21-1709-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-21-1709-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
UK marine data assimilation (MDA) involves a closely collaborating research community. In this paper, we offer both an overview of the state of the art and a vision for the future across all of the main areas of UK MDA, ranging from physics to biogeochemistry to coupled DA. We discuss the current UK MDA stakeholder applications, highlight theoretical developments needed to advance our systems, and reflect upon upcoming opportunities with respect to hardware and observational missions.
Frauke Bunsen, Judith Hauck, Sinhué Torres-Valdés, and Lars Nerger
Ocean Sci., 21, 437–471, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-21-437-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-21-437-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Computer models are often used to estimate the ocean's CO2 uptake due to a lack of direct observations. Because such idealized models do not match precisely with the real world, we combine real-world observations of ocean temperature and salinity with a model and study the effect on the modeled air–sea CO2 flux (2010–2020). The corrections of temperature and salinity have their largest effect on regional CO2 fluxes in the Southern Ocean in winter and a small effect on the global CO2 uptake.
Hongyi Li, Ting Yang, Lars Nerger, Dawei Zhang, Di Zhang, Guigang Tang, Haibo Wang, Yele Sun, Pingqing Fu, Hang Su, and Zifa Wang
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8495–8519, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8495-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8495-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
To accurately characterize the spatiotemporal distribution of particulate matter <2.5 µm chemical components, we developed the Nested Air Quality Prediction Model System with the Parallel Data Assimilation Framework (NAQPMS-PDAF) v2.0 for chemical components with non-Gaussian and nonlinear properties. NAQPMS-PDAF v2.0 has better computing efficiency, excels when used with a small ensemble size, and can significantly improve the simulation performance of chemical components.
Jorn Bruggeman, Karsten Bolding, Lars Nerger, Anna Teruzzi, Simone Spada, Jozef Skákala, and Stefano Ciavatta
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 5619–5639, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5619-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5619-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
To understand and predict the ocean’s capacity for carbon sequestration, its ability to supply food, and its response to climate change, we need the best possible estimate of its physical and biogeochemical properties. This is obtained through data assimilation which blends numerical models and observations. We present the Ensemble and Assimilation Tool (EAT), a flexible and efficient test bed that allows any scientist to explore and further develop the state of the art in data assimilation.
Changliang Shao and Lars Nerger
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4433–4445, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4433-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4433-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This paper introduces and evaluates WRF-PDAF, a fully online-coupled ensemble data assimilation (DA) system. A key advantage of the WRF-PDAF configuration is its ability to concurrently integrate all ensemble states, eliminating the need for time-consuming distribution and collection of ensembles during the coupling communication. The extra time required for DA amounts to only 20.6 % per cycle. Twin experiment results underscore the effectiveness of the WRF-PDAF system.
Yumeng Chen, Polly Smith, Alberto Carrassi, Ivo Pasmans, Laurent Bertino, Marc Bocquet, Tobias Sebastian Finn, Pierre Rampal, and Véronique Dansereau
The Cryosphere, 18, 2381–2406, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-2381-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-2381-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We explore multivariate state and parameter estimation using a data assimilation approach through idealised simulations in a dynamics-only sea-ice model based on novel rheology. We identify various potential issues that can arise in complex operational sea-ice models when model parameters are estimated. Even though further investigation will be needed for such complex sea-ice models, we show possibilities of improving the observed and the unobserved model state forecast and parameter accuracy.
Qi Tang, Hugo Delottier, Wolfgang Kurtz, Lars Nerger, Oliver S. Schilling, and Philip Brunner
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3559–3578, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3559-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3559-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We have developed a new data assimilation framework by coupling an integrated hydrological model HydroGeoSphere with the data assimilation software PDAF. Compared to existing hydrological data assimilation systems, the advantage of our newly developed framework lies in its consideration of the physically based model; its large selection of different assimilation algorithms; and its modularity with respect to the combination of different types of observations, states and parameters.
Bo Dong, Ross Bannister, Yumeng Chen, Alison Fowler, and Keith Haines
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 4233–4247, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4233-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4233-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Traditional Kalman smoothers are expensive to apply in large global ocean operational forecast and reanalysis systems. We develop a cost-efficient method to overcome the technical constraints and to improve the performance of existing reanalysis products.
Tobias Sebastian Finn, Charlotte Durand, Alban Farchi, Marc Bocquet, Yumeng Chen, Alberto Carrassi, and Véronique Dansereau
The Cryosphere, 17, 2965–2991, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-2965-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-2965-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We combine deep learning with a regional sea-ice model to correct model errors in the sea-ice dynamics of low-resolution forecasts towards high-resolution simulations. The combined model improves the forecast by up to 75 % and thereby surpasses the performance of persistence. As the error connection can additionally be used to analyse the shortcomings of the forecasts, this study highlights the potential of combined modelling for short-term sea-ice forecasting.
Nicholas Williams, Nicholas Byrne, Daniel Feltham, Peter Jan Van Leeuwen, Ross Bannister, David Schroeder, Andrew Ridout, and Lars Nerger
The Cryosphere, 17, 2509–2532, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-2509-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-2509-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Observations show that the Arctic sea ice cover has reduced over the last 40 years. This study uses ensemble-based data assimilation in a stand-alone sea ice model to investigate the impacts of assimilating three different kinds of sea ice observation, including the novel assimilation of sea ice thickness distribution. We show that assimilating ice thickness distribution has a positive impact on thickness and volume estimates within the ice pack, especially for very thick ice.
Sukun Cheng, Yumeng Chen, Ali Aydoğdu, Laurent Bertino, Alberto Carrassi, Pierre Rampal, and Christopher K. R. T. Jones
The Cryosphere, 17, 1735–1754, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-1735-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-1735-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This work studies a novel application of combining a Lagrangian sea ice model, neXtSIM, and data assimilation. It uses a deterministic ensemble Kalman filter to incorporate satellite-observed ice concentration and thickness in simulations. The neXtSIM Lagrangian nature is handled using a remapping strategy on a common homogeneous mesh. The ensemble is formed by perturbing air–ocean boundary conditions and ice cohesion. Thanks to data assimilation, winter Arctic sea ice forecasting is enhanced.
Jeff Polton, James Harle, Jason Holt, Anna Katavouta, Dale Partridge, Jenny Jardine, Sarah Wakelin, Julia Rulent, Anthony Wise, Katherine Hutchinson, David Byrne, Diego Bruciaferri, Enda O'Dea, Michela De Dominicis, Pierre Mathiot, Andrew Coward, Andrew Yool, Julien Palmiéri, Gennadi Lessin, Claudia Gabriela Mayorga-Adame, Valérie Le Guennec, Alex Arnold, and Clément Rousset
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1481–1510, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1481-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1481-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The aim is to increase the capacity of the modelling community to respond to societally important questions that require ocean modelling. The concept of reproducibility for regional ocean modelling is developed: advocating methods for reproducible workflows and standardised methods of assessment. Then, targeting the NEMO framework, we give practical advice and worked examples, highlighting key considerations that will the expedite development cycle and upskill the user community.
Hao-Cheng Yu, Yinglong Joseph Zhang, Lars Nerger, Carsten Lemmen, Jason C. S. Yu, Tzu-Yin Chou, Chi-Hao Chu, and Chuen-Teyr Terng
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-114, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-114, 2022
Preprint archived
Short summary
Short summary
We develop a new data assimilative approach by combining two parallel frameworks: PDAF and ESMF. This allows maximum flexibility and easy implementation of data assimilation for fully coupled earth system model applications. It is also validated by using a simple benchmark and applied to a realistic case simulation around Taiwan. The real case test shows significant improvement for temperature, velocity and surface elevation before, during and after typhoon events.
Yumeng Chen, Alberto Carrassi, and Valerio Lucarini
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 28, 633–649, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-28-633-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-28-633-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Chaotic dynamical systems are sensitive to the initial conditions, which are crucial for climate forecast. These properties are often used to inform the design of data assimilation (DA), a method used to estimate the exact initial conditions. However, obtaining the instability properties is burdensome for complex problems, both numerically and analytically. Here, we suggest a different viewpoint. We show that the skill of DA can be used to infer the instability properties of a dynamical system.
Cited articles
Anugerahanti, P., Roy, S., and Haines, K.: A perturbed biogeochemistry model ensemble evaluated against in situ and satellite observations, Biogeosciences, 15, 6685–6711, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-6685-2018, 2018. a
Argo: Argo float data and metadata from Global Data Assembly Centre (Argo GDAC), SEANOE [data set], https://doi.org/10.17882/42182, 2000. a, b
Arteaga, L. A., Behrenfeld, M. J., Boss, E., and Westberry, T. K.: Vertical Structure in Phytoplankton Growth and Productivity Inferred From Biogeochemical-Argo Floats and the Carbon-Based Productivity Model, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 36, e2022GB007389, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GB007389, 2022. a
Barnes, C., Irigoien, X., De Oliveira, J. A. A., Maxwell, D., and Jennings, S.: Predicting marine phytoplankton community size structure from empirical relationships with remotely sensed variables, J. Plankton Res., 33, 13–24, https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fbq088, 2010. a
Barton, N., Metzger, E. J., Reynolds, C. A., Ruston, B., Rowley, C., Smedstad, O. M., Ridout, J. A., Wallcraft, A., Frolov, S., Hogan, P., Janiga, M. A., Shriver, J. F., McLay, J., Thoppil, P., Huang, A., Crawford, W., Whitcomb, T., Bishop, C. H., Zamudio, L., and Phelps, M.: The Navy's Earth System Prediction Capability: A New Global Coupled Atmosphere-Ocean-Sea Ice Prediction System Designed for Daily to Subseasonal Forecasting, Earth Space Sci., 8, e2020EA001199, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EA001199, 2021. a
Baudena, A., Riom, W., Taillandier, V., Mayot, N., Mignot, A., and D'Ortenzio, F.: Comparing satellite and BGC-Argo chlorophyll estimation: A phenological study, Remote Sens. Environ., 326, 114743, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2025.114743, 2025. a
Behrenfeld, M. J., Boss, E., Siegel, D. A., and Shea, D. M.: Carbon-based ocean productivity and phytoplankton physiology from space, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 19, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GB002299, 2005. a
Bellacicco, M., Pitarch, J., Organelli, E., Martinez-Vicente, V., Volpe, G., and Marullo, S.: Improving the Retrieval of Carbon-Based Phytoplankton Biomass from Satellite Ocean Colour Observations, Remote Sens., 12, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12213640, 2020. a
Berx, B., Dickey-collas, M., Skogen, M. D., hervé De Roeck, Y., Klein, H., Barciela, R., Forster, R. M., Dombrowsky, E., Huret, M., Payne, M., Sagarminaga, Y., and Schrum, C.: Does Operational Oceanography Address the Needs of Fisheries and Applied Environmental Scientists?, Oceanography, 24, 166–171, http://www.jstor.org/stable/24861249 (last access: 13 August 2026), 2011. a
Biogeochemical-Argo Planning Group: The scientific rationale, design and implementation plan for a Biogeochemical-Argo float array, Report, https://doi.org/10.13155/46601, 2016. a
Bourdin, G., Karp-Boss, L., Lombard, F., Gorsky, G., and Boss, E.: Dynamics of island mass effect – Part 2: Phytoplankton physiological responses, Biogeosciences, 23, 2687–2728, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-23-2687-2026, 2026. a, b
Buitenhuis, E. T., Hashioka, T., and Le Quéré, C.: Combined constraints on global ocean primary production using observations and models, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 27, 847–858, https://doi.org/10.1002/gbc.20074, 2013. a
Butenschön, M., Clark, J., Aldridge, J. N., Allen, J. I., Artioli, Y., Blackford, J., Bruggeman, J., Cazenave, P., Ciavatta, S., Kay, S., Lessin, G., van Leeuwen, S., van der Molen, J., de Mora, L., Polimene, L., Sailley, S., Stephens, N., and Torres, R.: ERSEM 15.06: a generic model for marine biogeochemistry and the ecosystem dynamics of the lower trophic levels, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 1293–1339, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1293-2016, 2016. a
Campbell, J. W.: The lognormal distribution as a model for bio-optical variability in the sea, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 100, 13237–13254, https://doi.org/10.1029/95JC00458, 1995. a
Carroll, D., Menemenlis, D., Adkins, J. F., Bowman, K. W., Brix, H., Dutkiewicz, S., Fenty, I., Gierach, M. M., Hill, C., Jahn, O., Landschützer, P., Lauderdale, J. M., Liu, J., Manizza, M., Naviaux, J. D., Rödenbeck, C., Schimel, D. S., Van der Stocken, T., and Zhang, H.: The ECCO-Darwin Data-Assimilative Global Ocean Biogeochemistry Model: Estimates of Seasonal to Multidecadal Surface Ocean pCO2 and Air-Sea CO2 Flux, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 12, e2019MS001888, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001888, 2020. a
Chen, Y., Nerger, L., and Partridge, D.: Code and scripts for paper Effects of assimilating phytoplankton carbon in marine ecosystem modelling in NEMO4.0.4-MEDUSA2.0-PDAF2.0, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21670592, 2026. a
Ciavatta, S., Brewin, R. J. W., Skákala, J., Polimene, L., de Mora, L., Artioli, Y., and Allen, J. I.: Assimilation of Ocean-Color Plankton Functional Types to Improve Marine Ecosystem Simulations, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 123, 834–854, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JC013490, 2018. a
Ciavatta, S., Lazzari, P., Álvarez, E., Bertino, L., Bolding, K., Bruggeman, J., Capet, A., Cossarini, G., Daryabor, F., Nerger, L., Popov, M., Skákala, J., Spada, S., Teruzzi, A., Wakamatsu, T., Yumruktepe, V., and Brasseur, P.: Control of simulated ocean ecosystem indicators by biogeochemical observations, Prog. Oceanogr., 231, 103384, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2024.103384, 2025. a
Desroziers, G., Berre, L., Chapnik, B., and Poli, P.: Diagnosis of observation, background and analysis-error statistics in observation space, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 131, 3385–3396, https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.05.108, 2005. a
Eyre, J. R.: Observation bias correction schemes in data assimilation systems: a theoretical study of some of their properties, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 142, 2284–2291, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2819, 2016. a
Falkowski, P. G.: The role of phytoplankton photosynthesis in global biogeochemical cycles, Photosynth. Res., 39, 235–258, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00014586, 1994. a
Fennel, K., Gehlen, M., Brasseur, P., Brown, C. W., Ciavatta, S., Cossarini, G., Crise, A., Edwards, C. A., Ford, D., Friedrichs, M. A. M., Gregoire, M., Jones, E., Kim, H.-C., Lamouroux, J., Murtugudde, R., Perruche, C., and the GODAE OceanView Marine Ecosystem Analysis and Prediction Task Team: Advancing Marine Biogeochemical and Ecosystem Reanalyses and Forecasts as Tools for Monitoring and Managing Ecosystem Health, Frontiers in Marine Science, 6, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00089, 2019. a
Ford, D. and Barciela, R.: Global marine biogeochemical reanalyses assimilating two different sets of merged ocean colour products, Remote Sens. Environ., 203, 40–54, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.03.040, 2017. a, b, c
Fowler, A. M., Dance, S. L., and Waller, J. A.: On the interaction of observation and prior error correlations in data assimilation, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 144, 48–62, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3183, 2018. a
Fowler, A. M., Skákala, J., and Ford, D.: Validating and improving the uncertainty assumptions for the assimilation of ocean-colour-derived chlorophyll a into a marine biogeochemistry model of the Northwest European Shelf Seas, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 149, 300–324, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4408, 2023. a
Gehlen, M., Barciela, R., Bertino, L., Brasseur, P., Butenschön, M., Chai, F., Crise, A., Drillet, Y., Ford, D., Lavoie, D., Lehodey, P., Perruche, C., Samuelsen, A., and Simon, E.: Building the capacity for forecasting marine biogeochemistry and ecosystems: recent advances and future developments, J. Oper. Oceanogr., 8, s168–s187, https://doi.org/10.1080/1755876X.2015.1022350, 2015. a, b
Graff, J. R., Westberry, T. K., Milligan, A. J., Brown, M. B., Dall'Olmo, G., van Dongen-Vogels, V., Reifel, K. M., and Behrenfeld, M. J.: Analytical phytoplankton carbon measurements spanning diverse ecosystems, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 102, 16–25, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2015.04.006, 2015. a, b, c
Gregg, W. W.: Assimilation of SeaWiFS ocean chlorophyll data into a three-dimensional global ocean model, J. Marine Syst., 69, 205–225, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2006.02.015, 2008. a
Hemmings, J. C., Barciela, R. M., and Bell, M. J.: Ocean color data assimilation with material conservation for improving model estimates of air-sea CO2 flux, J. Marine Res., 66, 87–126, 2008. a
Hemmings, J. C. P., Challenor, P. G., and Yool, A.: Mechanistic site-based emulation of a global ocean biogeochemical model (MEDUSA 1.0) for parametric analysis and calibration: an application of the Marine Model Optimization Testbed (MarMOT 1.1), Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 697–731, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-697-2015, 2015. a
Hersbach, H.: Decomposition of the Continuous Ranked Probability Score for Ensemble Prediction Systems, Weather Forecast., 15, 559–570, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(2000)015<0559:DOTCRP>2.0.CO;2, 2000. a
Higgs, I., Bannister, R., Skákala, J., Carrassi, A., and Ciavatta, S.: Hybrid machine learning data assimilation for marine biogeochemistry, Biogeosciences, 23, 315–344, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-23-315-2026, 2026. a
Janjić, T., Bormann, N., Bocquet, M., Carton, J. A., Cohn, S. E., Dance, S. L., Losa, S. N., Nichols, N. K., Potthast, R., Waller, J. A., and Weston, P.: On the representation error in data assimilation, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 144, 1257–1278, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3130, 2018. a
Johnson, K. S. and Bif, M. B.: Constraint on net primary productivity of the global ocean by Argo oxygen measurements, Nat. Geosci., 14, 769–774, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-021-00807-z, 2021. a
Kettle, H.: Using satellite-derived backscattering coefficients in addition to chlorophyll data to constrain a simple marine biogeochemical model, Biogeosciences, 6, 1591–1601, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-6-1591-2009, 2009.. a
Kobayashi, S., Ota, Y., Harada, Y., Ebita, A., Moriya, M., Onoda, H., Onogi, K., Kamahori, H., Kobayashi, C., Endo, H., Miyaoka, K., and Takahashi, K.: The JRA-55 Reanalysis: General Specifications and Basic Characteristics, J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn. Ser. II, 93, 5–48, https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.2015-001, 2015. a
Kulk, G., Platt, T., Dingle, J., Jackson, T., Jönsson, B. F., Bouman, H. A., Babin, M., Brewin, R. J. W., Doblin, M., Estrada, M., Figueiras, F. G., Furuya, K., González-Benítez, N., Gudfinnsson, H. G., Gudmundsson, K., Huang, B., Isada, T., Kovač, v., Lutz, V. A., Marañón, E., Raman, M., Richardson, K., Rozema, P. D., Poll, W. H. v. d., Segura, V., Tilstone, G. H., Uitz, J., Dongen-Vogels, V. v., Yoshikawa, T., and Sathyendranath, S.: Primary Production, an Index of Climate Change in the Ocean: Satellite-Based Estimates over Two Decades, Remote Sens., 12, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12050826, 2020. a
Lehodey, P., Senina, I., and Murtugudde, R.: A spatial ecosystem and populations dynamics model (SEAPODYM) – Modeling of tuna and tuna-like populations, Prog. Oceanogr., 78, 304–318, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2008.06.004, 2008. a
Leutbecher, M. and Palmer, T.: Ensemble forecasting, J. Comput. Phys., 227, 3515–3539, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2007.02.014, 2008. a, b
Madec, G., Bell, M., Blaker, A., Bricaud, C., Bruciaferri, D., Castrillo, M., Calvert, D., Chanut, J., Clementi, E., Coward, A., Epicoco, I., Éthé, C., Ganderton, J., Harle, J., Hutchinson, K., Iovino, D., Lea, D., Lovato, T., Martin, M., Martin, N., Mele, F., Martins, D., Masson, S., Mathiot, P., Mele, F., Mocavero, S., Müller, S., Nurser, A. G., Paronuzzi, S., Peltier, M., Person, R., Rousset, C., Rynders, S., Samson, G., Téchené, S., Vancoppenolle, M., and Wilson, C.: NEMO Ocean Engine Reference Manual, Zenodo, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8167700, 2023. a, b
Mamnun, N., Völker, C., Vrekoussis, M., and Nerger, L.: Uncertainties in ocean biogeochemical simulations: Application of ensemble data assimilation to a one-dimensional model, Frontiers in Marine Science, 9, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2022.984236, 2022. a
Mamnun, N., Völker, C., Vrekoussis, M., and Nerger, L.: Spatially Varying Biogeochemical Parameter Estimation in a Global Ocean Model, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 130, e2025JC022752, https://doi.org/10.1029/2025JC022752, 2025. a
Manizza, M., Le Quéré, C., Watson, A. J., and Buitenhuis, E. T.: Bio-optical feedbacks among phytoplankton, upper ocean physics and sea-ice in a global model, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL020778, 2005. a
Martiny, A. C., Ustick, L. J., Westberry, T. K., and Behrenfeld, M. J.: Genomic-to-space measurements reveal large-scale ocean nutrient stress, Sci. Adv., 12, eaed8089, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aed8089, 2026. a
Mignac, D., Waters, J., Lea, D. J., Martin, M. J., While, J., Weaver, A. T., Vidard, A., Guiavarc'h, C., Storkey, D., Ford, D., Blockley, E. W., Baker, J., Haines, K., Price, M. R., Bell, M. J., and Renshaw, R.: Improvements to the Met Office's global ocean–sea ice forecasting system including model and data assimilation changes, Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 3405–3425, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3405-2025, 2025. a
NASA Ocean Biology Processing Group: Aqua MODIS Level-4 Global Mapped Carbon Data, version 2022.0, NASA Ocean Biology Distributed Active Archive Center [data set], https://doi.org/10.5067/AQUA/MODIS/L4M/CARBON/2022.0, 2025. a
Nerger, L. and Hiller, W.: Software for ensemble-based data assimilation systems – Implementation strategies and scalability, Comput. Geosci., 55, 110–118, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2012.03.026, 2013. a, b
Nerger, L., Janjić, T., Schröter, J., and Hiller, W.: A Unification of Ensemble Square Root Kalman Filters, Mon. Weather Rev., 140, 2335–2345, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-11-00102.1, 2012. a, b
Petrik, C. M., Luo, J. Y., Heneghan, R. F., Everett, J. D., Harrison, C. S., and Richardson, A. J.: Assessment and Constraint of Mesozooplankton in CMIP6 Earth System Models, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 36, e2022GB007367, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GB007367, 2022. a
Pham, D. T.: Stochastic Methods for Sequential Data Assimilation in Strongly Nonlinear Systems, Mon. Weather Rev., 129, 1194–1207, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129<1194:SMFSDA>2.0.CO;2, 2001. a
Polton, J., Harle, J., Holt, J., Katavouta, A., Partridge, D., Jardine, J., Wakelin, S., Rulent, J., Wise, A., Hutchinson, K., Byrne, D., Bruciaferri, D., O'Dea, E., De Dominicis, M., Mathiot, P., Coward, A., Yool, A., Palmiéri, J., Lessin, G., Mayorga-Adame, C. G., Le Guennec, V., Arnold, A., and Rousset, C.: Reproducible and relocatable regional ocean modelling: fundamentals and practices, Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1481–1510, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1481-2023, 2023. a
Rodwell, M. J., Lang, S. T. K., Ingleby, N. B., Bormann, N., Hólm, E., Rabier, F., Richardson, D. S., and Yamaguchi, M.: Reliability in ensemble data assimilation, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 142, 443–454, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2663, 2016. a
Roemmich, D., Alford, M. H., Claustre, H., Johnson, K., King, B., Moum, J., Oke, P., Owens, W. B., Pouliquen, S., Purkey, S., Scanderbeg, M., Suga, T., Wijffels, S., Zilberman, N., Bakker, D., Baringer, M., Belbeoch, M., Bittig, H. C., Boss, E., Calil, P., Carse, F., Carval, T., Chai, F., Conchubhair, D. O., d'Ortenzio, F., Dall'Olmo, G., Desbruyeres, D., Fennel, K., Fer, I., Ferrari, R., Forget, G., Freeland, H., Fujiki, T., Gehlen, M., Greenan, B., Hallberg, R., Hibiya, T., Hosoda, S., Jayne, S., Jochum, M., Johnson, G. C., Kang, K., Kolodziejczyk, N., Körtzinger, A., Traon, P.-Y. L., Lenn, Y.-D., Maze, G., Mork, K. A., Morris, T., Nagai, T., Nash, J., Garabato, A. N., Olsen, A., Pattabhi, R. R., Prakash, S., Riser, S., Schmechtig, C., Schmid, C., Shroyer, E., Sterl, A., Sutton, P., Talley, L., Tanhua, T., Thierry, V., Thomalla, S., Toole, J., Troisi, A., Trull, T. W., Turton, J., Velez-Belchi, P. J., Walczowski, W., Wang, H., Wanninkhof, R., Waterhouse, A. F., Waterman, S., Watson, A., Wilson, C., Wong, A. P. S., Xu, J., and Yasuda, I.: On the Future of Argo: A Global, Full-Depth, Multi-Disciplinary Array, Frontiers in Marine Science, 6, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00439, 2019. a
Roesler, C., Uitz, J., Claustre, H., Boss, E., Xing, X., Organelli, E., Briggs, N., Bricaud, A., Schmechtig, C., Poteau, A., D'Ortenzio, F., Ras, J., Drapeau, S., Haëntjens, N., and Barbieux, M.: Recommendations for obtaining unbiased chlorophyll estimates from in situ chlorophyll fluorometers: A global analysis of WET Labs ECO sensors, Limnol. Oceanogr.-Meth., 15, 572–585, https://doi.org/10.1002/lom3.10185, 2017. a, b
Ryan-Keogh, T. J., Thomalla, S. J., Chang, N., and Moalusi, T.: A new global oceanic multi-model net primary productivity data product, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 4829–4848, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-4829-2023, 2023. a
Saha, S., Moorthi, S., Wu, X., Wang, J., Nadiga, S., Tripp, P., Behringer, D., Hou, Y.-T., ya Chuang, H., Iredell, M., Ek, M., Meng, J., Yang, R., Mendez, M. P., van den Dool, H., Zhang, Q., Wang, W., Chen, M., and Becker, E.: The NCEP Climate Forecast System Version 2, J. Climate, 27, 2185–2208, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00823.1, 2014. a
Sathyendranath, S., Platt, T., Žarko Kovač, Dingle, J., Jackson, T., Brewin, R. J. W., Franks, P., nón, E. M., Kulk, G., and Bouman, H. A.: Reconciling models of primary production and photoacclimation, Appl. Optics, 59, C100–C114, https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.386252, 2020. a, b, c
Sathyendranath, S., Jackson, T., Brockmann, C., Brotas, V., Calton, B., Chuprin, A., Clements, O., Cipollini, P., Danne, O., Dingle, J., Donlon, C., Grant, M., Groom, S., Krasemann, H., Lavender, S., Mazeran, C., Mélin, F., Müller, D., Steinmetz, F., Valente, A., Zühlke, M., Feldman, G., Franz, B., Frouin, R., Werdell, J., and Platt, T.: ESA Ocean Colour Climate Change Initiative (Ocean_Colour_cci): Version 5.0 Data. NERC EDS Centre for Environmental Data Analysis [data set], https://doi.org/10.5285/1dbe7a109c0244aaad713e078fd3059a, 2021a. a, b
Sathyendranath, S., Platt, T., Kovač, v., Dingle, J., Jackson, T., Brewin, R., Franks, P., Kulk, G., and Bouman, H.: BICEP/NCEO: Monthly global Phytoplankton Carbon, between 1998–2020 at 9 km resolution (derived from the Ocean Colour Climate Change Initiative v5.0 dataset), NERC EDS Centre for Environmental Data Analysis [data set], https://doi.org/10.5285/6a6ccbb8ef2645308a60dc47e9b8b5fb, 2021b. a, b, c
Schartau, M., Wallhead, P., Hemmings, J., Löptien, U., Kriest, I., Krishna, S., Ward, B. A., Slawig, T., and Oschlies, A.: Reviews and syntheses: parameter identification in marine planktonic ecosystem modelling, Biogeosciences, 14, 1647–1701, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-1647-2017, 2017. a
Schourup-Kristensen, V., Sidorenko, D., Wolf-Gladrow, D. A., and Völker, C.: A skill assessment of the biogeochemical model REcoM2 coupled to the Finite Element Sea Ice–Ocean Model (FESOM 1.3), Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 2769–2802, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-2769-2014, 2014. a
SeaBASS: North Atlantic Aerosols and Marine Ecosystems Study, NASA Ocean Biology Distributed Active Archive Center [data set], https://doi.org/10.5067/SEABASS/NAAMES/DATA001, 2014. a, b
Siegel, D. A., Maritorena, S., Nelson, N. B., and Behrenfeld, M. J.: Independence and interdependencies among global ocean color properties: Reassessing the bio-optical assumption, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 110, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JC002527, 2005. a
Siegel, D. A., DeVries, T., Cetinić, I., and Bisson, K. M.: Quantifying the Ocean's Biological Pump and Its Carbon Cycle Impacts on Global Scales, Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci., 15, 329–356, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-040722-115226, 2023. a
Simon, E., Samuelsen, A., Bertino, L., and Mouysset, S.: Experiences in multiyear combined state–parameter estimation with an ecosystem model of the North Atlantic and Arctic Oceans using the Ensemble Kalman Filter, J. Marine Syst., 152, 1–17, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2015.07.004, 2015. a
Skákala, J., Ford, D., Brewin, R. J., McEwan, R., Kay, S., Taylor, B., de Mora, L., and Ciavatta, S.: The Assimilation of Phytoplankton Functional Types for Operational Forecasting in the Northwest European Shelf, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 123, 5230–5247, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JC014153, 2018. a
Skákala, J., Ford, D., Bruggeman, J., Hull, T., Kaiser, J., King, R. R., Loveday, B., Palmer, M. R., Smyth, T., Williams, C. A. J., and Ciavatta, S.: Towards a Multi-Platform Assimilative System for North Sea Biogeochemistry, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 126, e2020JC016649, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JC016649, 2021. a
Skákala, J., Bruggeman, J., Ford, D., Wakelin, S., Akpınar, A., Hull, T., Kaiser, J., Loveday, B. R., O'Dea, E., Williams, C. A., and Ciavatta, S.: The impact of ocean biogeochemistry on physics and its consequences for modelling shelf seas, Ocean Model., 172, 101976, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2022.101976, 2022. a
Skákala, J., Ford, D., Fowler, A., Lea, D., Martin, M. J., and Ciavatta, S.: How uncertain and observable are marine ecosystem indicators in shelf seas?, Prog. Oceanogr., 224, 103249, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2024.103249, 2024. a
Skákala, J., Ford, D., Haines, K., Lawless, A., Martin, M. J., Browne, P., Chrust, M., Ciavatta, S., Fowler, A., Lea, D., Palmer, M., Rochner, A., Waters, J., Zuo, H., Banerjee, D. S., Bell, M., Carneiro, D. M., Chen, Y., Kay, S., Partridge, D., Price, M., Renshaw, R., Shapiro, G., and While, J.: Marine data assimilation in the UK: the past, the present, and the vision for the future, Ocean Sci., 21, 1709–1734, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-21-1709-2025, 2025. a, b
Storto, A. and Andriopoulos, P.: A new stochastic ocean physics package and its application to hybrid-covariance data assimilation, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 147, 1691–1725, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3990, 2021. a
Takahashi, T., Sutherland, S. C., Wanninkhof, R., Sweeney, C., Feely, R. A., Chipman, D. W., Hales, B., Friederich, G., Chavez, F., Sabine, C., Watson, A., Bakker, D. C., Schuster, U., Metzl, N., Yoshikawa-Inoue, H., Ishii, M., Midorikawa, T., Nojiri, Y., Körtzinger, A., Steinhoff, T., Hoppema, M., Olafsson, J., Arnarson, T. S., Tilbrook, B., Johannessen, T., Olsen, A., Bellerby, R., Wong, C., Delille, B., Bates, N., and de Baar, H. J.: Climatological mean and decadal change in surface ocean pCO2, and net sea–air CO2 flux over the global oceans, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 56, 554–577, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2008.12.009, 2009. a
Tanioka, T., Garcia, C. A., Larkin, A. A., Garcia, N. S., Fagan, A. J., and Martiny, A. C.: Global patterns and predictors of C : N : P in marine ecosystems, Commun. Earth Environ., 3, 271, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-022-00603-6, 2022. a
Verdy, A. and Mazloff, M. R.: A data assimilating model for estimating Southern Ocean biogeochemistry, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 122, 6968–6988, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JC012650, 2017. a
Wanninkhof, R., Park, G.-H., Takahashi, T., Sweeney, C., Feely, R., Nojiri, Y., Gruber, N., Doney, S. C., McKinley, G. A., Lenton, A., Le Quéré, C., Heinze, C., Schwinger, J., Graven, H., and Khatiwala, S.: Global ocean carbon uptake: magnitude, variability and trends, Biogeosciences, 10, 1983–2000, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-1983-2013, 2013. a
Xi, H., Losa, S. N., Mangin, A., Garnesson, P., Bretagnon, M., Demaria, J., Soppa, M. A., Hembise Fanton d'Andon, O., and Bracher, A.: Global Chlorophyll a Concentrations of Phytoplankton Functional Types With Detailed Uncertainty Assessment Using Multisensor Ocean Color and Sea Surface Temperature Satellite Products, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 126, e2020JC017127, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JC017127, 2021. a
Xiao, Y. and Friedrichs, M. A. M.: Using biogeochemical data assimilation to assess the relative skill of multiple ecosystem models in the Mid-Atlantic Bight: effects of increasing the complexity of the planktonic food web, Biogeosciences, 11, 3015–3030, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-3015-2014, 2014. a
Yang, G., Bellacicco, M., Organelli, E., and Xing, X.: Global Variability of Phytoplankton Carbon and Non-Algal Particles From Ocean Color Data Based on a Photoacclimation Model, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 129, e2023JC019922, https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JC019922, 2024. a
Yool, A., Popova, E. E., and Anderson, T. R.: Medusa-1.0: a new intermediate complexity plankton ecosystem model for the global domain, Geosci. Model Dev., 4, 381–417, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-381-2011, 2011. a
Yool, A., Palmiéri, J., Jones, C. G., de Mora, L., Kuhlbrodt, T., Popova, E. E., Nurser, A. J. G., Hirschi, J., Blaker, A. T., Coward, A. C., Blockley, E. W., and Sellar, A. A.: Evaluating the physical and biogeochemical state of the global ocean component of UKESM1 in CMIP6 historical simulations, Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 3437–3472, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3437-2021, 2021. a
Yumruktepe, V. Ç., Samuelsen, A., and Daewel, U.: ECOSMO II(CHL): a marine biogeochemical model for the North Atlantic and the Arctic, Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 3901–3921, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3901-2022, 2022. a
Zuo, H., Balmaseda, M. A., Tietsche, S., Mogensen, K., and Mayer, M.: The ECMWF operational ensemble reanalysis–analysis system for ocean and sea ice: a description of the system and assessment, Ocean Sci., 15, 779–808, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-15-779-2019, 2019. a
Short summary
Operational marine ecosystem forecasts traditionally rely on combining phytoplankton chlorophyll observations with model forecasts. However, using our newly developed ensemble data assimilation system, we demonstrate that assimilating phytoplankton carbon data leads to more balanced phytoplankton estimates and adjusts estimates of global ocean carbon.
Operational marine ecosystem forecasts traditionally rely on combining phytoplankton chlorophyll...
