Geoscientific Model Development
Geoscientific Model Development
GMD
Articles | Volume 19, issue 11
Articles | Volume 19, issue 11
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-4817-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Collection:
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-4817-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 19, issue 11
Model evaluation paper
 | 
05 Jun 2026
Model evaluation paper |  | 05 Jun 2026

Why does the signal-to-noise paradox exist in seasonal climate predictability?

Shivamurthy Yashas, Subodh Kumar Saha, Samir Pokhrel, Mahen Konwar, and Verma Utkarsh

Viewed

Total article views: 18,320 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
15,447 2,454 419 18,320 574 384 384
  • HTML: 15,447
  • PDF: 2,454
  • XML: 419
  • Total: 18,320
  • Supplement: 574
  • BibTeX: 384
  • EndNote: 384
Views and downloads (calculated since 10 Jul 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 10 Jul 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 18,320 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 18,097 with geography defined and 223 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Saved (final revised paper)

Latest update: 05 Oct 2026
Download
Short summary
This study highlights challenges in estimating seasonal climate predictability using the perfect model framework, which assumes only initial conditions cause error. We show that forecasts can exceed the predicted limit, known as the Potential Predictability Limit (PPL), due to model imperfections in simulating physical processes. A new method is proposed to estimate PPL more accurately and avoid such paradoxes.
Read more
Share
Collection
The global hydrological model WaterGAP (GMD/NHESS)