Articles | Volume 17, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-321-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-321-2024
Model description paper
 | 
15 Jan 2024
Model description paper |  | 15 Jan 2024

BoundaryLayerDynamics.jl v1.0: a modern codebase for atmospheric boundary-layer simulations

Manuel F. Schmid, Marco G. Giometto, Gregory A. Lawrence, and Marc B. Parlange

Related authors

On the suitability of second-order accurate finite-volume solvers for the simulation of atmospheric boundary layer flow
Beatrice Giacomini and Marco G. Giometto
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 1409–1426, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1409-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1409-2021, 2021
Short summary

Related subject area

Atmospheric sciences
GEO4PALM v1.1: an open-source geospatial data processing toolkit for the PALM model system
Dongqi Lin, Jiawei Zhang, Basit Khan, Marwan Katurji, and Laura E. Revell
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 815–845, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-815-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-815-2024, 2024
Short summary
Modeling collision–coalescence in particle microphysics: numerical convergence of mean and variance of precipitation in cloud simulations using the University of Warsaw Lagrangian Cloud Model (UWLCM) 2.1
Piotr Zmijewski, Piotr Dziekan, and Hanna Pawlowska
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 759–780, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-759-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-759-2024, 2024
Short summary
Modeling below-cloud scavenging of size-resolved particles in GEM-MACHv3.1
Roya Ghahreman, Wanmin Gong, Paul A. Makar, Alexandru Lupu, Amanda Cole, Kulbir Banwait, Colin Lee, and Ayodeji Akingunola
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 685–707, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-685-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-685-2024, 2024
Short summary
Impacts of a double-moment bulk cloud microphysics scheme (NDW6-G23) on aerosol fields in NICAM.19 with a global 14 km grid resolution
Daisuke Goto, Tatsuya Seiki, Kentaroh Suzuki, Hisashi Yashiro, and Toshihiko Takemura
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 651–684, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-651-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-651-2024, 2024
Short summary
Sensitivity of air quality model responses to emission changes: comparison of results based on four EU inventories through FAIRMODE benchmarking methodology
Alexander de Meij, Cornelis Cuvelier, Philippe Thunis, Enrico Pisoni, and Bertrand Bessagnet
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 587–606, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-587-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-587-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Albertson, J. D. and Parlange, M. B.: Surface length scales and shear stress: implications for land–atmosphere interaction over complex terrain, Water Resour. Res., 35, 2121–2132, https://doi.org/10.1029/1999wr900094, 1999a. a
Albertson, J. D. and Parlange, M. B.: Natural integration of scalar fluxes from complex terrain, Adv. Water Resour., 23, 239–252, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0309-1708(99)00011-1, 1999b. a
Bardina, J., Ferziger, J. H., and Reynolds, W. C.: Improved subgrid-scale models for large-eddy simulation, in: 13th Fluid and PlasmaDynamics Conference, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1980-1357, 1980. a
Bezanson, J., Edelman, A., Karpinski, S., and Shah, V. B.: Julia: A fresh approach to numerical computing, SIAM Review, 59, 65–98, https://doi.org/10.1137/141000671, 2017. a
Bou-Zeid, E., Meneveau, C., and Parlange, M. B.: A Scale-Dependent Lagrangian Dynamic Model for Large Eddy Simulation of Complex Turbulent Flows, Phys. Fluids, 17, 025105, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1839152, 2005. a
Download
Short summary
Turbulence-resolving flow models have strict performance requirements, as simulations often run for weeks using hundreds of processes. Many flow scenarios also require the flexibility to modify physical and numerical models for problem-specific requirements. With a new code written in Julia we hope to make such adaptations easier without compromising on performance. In this paper we discuss the modeling approach and present validation and performance results.