Articles | Volume 16, issue 22
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6593-2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6593-2023
Methods for assessment of models
 | 
16 Nov 2023
Methods for assessment of models |  | 16 Nov 2023

Monte Carlo drift correction – quantifying the drift uncertainty of global climate models

Benjamin S. Grandey, Zhi Yang Koh, Dhrubajyoti Samanta, Benjamin P. Horton, Justin Dauwels, and Lock Yue Chew

Related authors

Tide-Surge Interaction near Singapore and Malaysia using a Semi-empirical Model
Zhi Yang Koh, Benjamin S. Grandey, Dhrubajyoti Samanta, Adam D. Switzer, Benjamin P. Horton, Justin Dauwels, and Lock Yue Chew
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-294,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-294, 2024
Short summary
Impacts on cloud radiative effects induced by coexisting aerosols converted from international shipping and maritime DMS emissions
Qinjian Jin, Benjamin S. Grandey, Daniel Rothenberg, Alexander Avramov, and Chien Wang
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 16793–16808, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-16793-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-16793-2018, 2018
Short summary
Effective radiative forcing in the aerosol–climate model CAM5.3-MARC-ARG
Benjamin S. Grandey, Daniel Rothenberg, Alexander Avramov, Qinjian Jin, Hsiang-He Lee, Xiaohong Liu, Zheng Lu, Samuel Albani, and Chien Wang
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 15783–15810, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-15783-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-15783-2018, 2018
Short summary
Radiative effects of interannually varying vs. interannually invariant aerosol emissions from fires
Benjamin S. Grandey, Hsiang-He Lee, and Chien Wang
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 14495–14513, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-14495-2016,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-14495-2016, 2016
Short summary
The contribution of the strength and structure of extratropical cyclones to observed cloud–aerosol relationships
B. S. Grandey, P. Stier, R. G. Grainger, and T. M. Wagner
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 10689–10701, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-10689-2013,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-10689-2013, 2013

Related subject area

Climate and Earth system modeling
Implementing detailed nucleation predictions in the Earth system model EC-Earth3.3.4: sulfuric acid–ammonia nucleation
Carl Svenhag, Moa K. Sporre, Tinja Olenius, Daniel Yazgi, Sara M. Blichner, Lars P. Nieradzik, and Pontus Roldin
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4923–4942, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4923-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4923-2024, 2024
Short summary
Modeling biochar effects on soil organic carbon on croplands in a microbial decomposition model (MIMICS-BC_v1.0)
Mengjie Han, Qing Zhao, Xili Wang, Ying-Ping Wang, Philippe Ciais, Haicheng Zhang, Daniel S. Goll, Lei Zhu, Zhe Zhao, Zhixuan Guo, Chen Wang, Wei Zhuang, Fengchang Wu, and Wei Li
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4871–4890, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4871-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4871-2024, 2024
Short summary
Hector V3.2.0: functionality and performance of a reduced-complexity climate model
Kalyn Dorheim, Skylar Gering, Robert Gieseke, Corinne Hartin, Leeya Pressburger, Alexey N. Shiklomanov, Steven J. Smith, Claudia Tebaldi, Dawn L. Woodard, and Ben Bond-Lamberty
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4855–4869, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4855-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4855-2024, 2024
Short summary
Evaluation of CMIP6 model simulations of PM2.5 and its components over China
Fangxuan Ren, Jintai Lin, Chenghao Xu, Jamiu A. Adeniran, Jingxu Wang, Randall V. Martin, Aaron van Donkelaar, Melanie S. Hammer, Larry W. Horowitz, Steven T. Turnock, Naga Oshima, Jie Zhang, Susanne Bauer, Kostas Tsigaridis, Øyvind Seland, Pierre Nabat, David Neubauer, Gary Strand, Twan van Noije, Philippe Le Sager, and Toshihiko Takemura
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4821–4836, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4821-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4821-2024, 2024
Short summary
Assessment of a tiling energy budget approach in a land surface model, ORCHIDEE-MICT (r8205)
Yi Xi, Chunjing Qiu, Yuan Zhang, Dan Zhu, Shushi Peng, Gustaf Hugelius, Jinfeng Chang, Elodie Salmon, and Philippe Ciais
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4727–4754, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4727-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4727-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Bouttes, N., Gregory, J. M., and Lowe, J. A.: The Reversibility of Sea Level Rise, J. Climate., 26, 2502–2513, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00285.1, 2013. a
Brunetti, M. and Vérard, C.: How to Reduce Long-Term Drift in Present-Day and Deep-Time Simulations?, Clim. Dynam., 50, 4425–4436, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-017-3883-7, 2018. a, b
Choudhury, D., Sen Gupta, A., Sharma, A., Mehrotra, R., and Sivakumar, B.: An Assessment of Drift Correction Alternatives for CMIP5 Decadal Predictions, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, 10282–10296, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD026900, 2017. a
Cuesta-Valero, F. J., García-García, A., Beltrami, H., and Finnis, J.: First assessment of the earth heat inventory within CMIP5 historical simulations, Earth Syst. Dynam., 12, 581–600, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-581-2021, 2021. a
Davies, J. H. and Davies, D. R.: Earth's surface heat flux, Solid Earth, 1, 5–24, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-1-5-2010, 2010. a
Download
Short summary
Global climate models are susceptible to spurious trends known as drift. Fortunately, drift can be corrected when analysing data produced by models. To explore the uncertainty associated with drift correction, we develop a new method: Monte Carlo drift correction. For historical simulations of thermosteric sea level rise, drift uncertainty is relatively large. When analysing data susceptible to drift, researchers should consider drift uncertainty.